REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Dirty Tricks and Pettiness

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Monday, March 7, 2011 10:10
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1709
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, March 3, 2011 11:58 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Okay, so I’ve long known Republicans are quite adept at dirty tricks and “misspeaking”...but I never realized they were apparently born without even the concept of conscience or morality. I’m getting quite an education lately:

Under “dirty tricks”:
Quote:

Senate Bill 5, which will limit most collective bargaining rights for public employees in Ohio, bar all strikes under penalty of law, and ban binding arbitration, just passed the Ohio State Senate by one vote, 17-16. Republicans have a 23-10 hold on the State Senate, and six of them dropped off this anti-union bill.

In order to make it work, Ohio Republicans had to shuffle two committees to ensure they had the votes to pass the bill out. They had to take Bill Zeitz off the Insurance, Commerce and Labor Committee to get the bill out of there. Then, they had to yank Scott Oelslager off the Rules Committee to avoid a deadlock there.

http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/03/02/sb-5-passes-ohio-senate-after-r
epublicans-reconfigure-committees
.

So they had to switch to of their own who were against the measure with two who were FOR the measure to get the votes they needed in two committees. Yeah, it’s legal under the rules, but THEY wrote the rules. I call foul.

Then there’s Huckabee:
Quote:

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee suggested in a radio interview that President Barack Obama's childhood in Kenya shaped his worldview — even though Obama did not visit Kenya until he was in his 20s.

"One thing that I do know is his having grown up in Kenya, his view of the Brits, for example, (is) very different than the average American," Huckabee said, pointing to Obama's decision in 2009 to remove a bust of former Prime Minister Winston Churchill from the Oval Office. He failed to note that Obama replaced the Oval Office fixture with a bust of one of his American heroes, President Abraham Lincoln, and moved the Churchill bust to the White House residence.

"The bust of Winston Churchill, a great insult to the British," Huckabee said. "But If you think about it, his perspective as growing up in Kenya with a Kenyan father and grandfather, their view of the Mau Mau revolution in Kenya is very different than ours.” He probably grew up hearing that the British were a bunch of imperialists who persecuted his grandfather.”

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2011/0302/Mike-Huckabee
-caught-claiming-Obama-grew-up-in-Kenya


That one’s WAY over the top! Later his spokesman “clarified”:
Quote:

"When the governor mentioned he wanted to know more about the president, he wasn't talking about the president's place of birth — the governor believes the president was born in Hawaii," Hogan Gidley said. "The governor would, however, like to know more about where President Obama's liberal policies come from and what else the president plans to do to this country — as do most Americans." Gidley said Huckabee meant to reference Obama's childhood in Indonesia, where he lived from the ages of 5 to 10. Gidley didn't explain the connection to the Mau Mau uprising.
(Same)

Then Huckabee himself, probably realizing the important point had been made (kind of like a judge telling a jury to disregard something):
Quote:

Last night, Huckabee ventured into friendly territory to explain himself, telling Bill O'Reilly that he misspoke, and instead meant to say Indonesia, where Obama did spend a few years of his childhood.

"It was about the fortieth media interview of the day. Have you done these things. If I had read from my own text, page 183 of my book, I clearly said he grew up in Indonesia. It was a verbal gaffe. I immediately apologized. But that's not enough for the left-wing media in this country, Bill."

http://www.businessinsider.com/bill-oreilly-mike-huckabee-obama-kenya-
madrassa-2011-3#ixzz1FZjRinxy


...so, the Mau-Mau idea came from where, exactly? I love the non-apology with the flourish at the end.

As to pettiness, it’s getting to be downright hysterical:
Quote:

Wisconsin Senate Republicans briefly convened the chamber on Thursday, in order to lay down yet another ultimatum to the 14 Democrats who have fled the state in order to block budget quorum on Gov. Scott Walker's anti-public employee union proposals: Return by 4 p.m. Central Time...or you're in contempt!

The resolution passed by the state Senate orders the Sergeant at Arms, if the Dems don't show up by 4 p.m., to "take any and all necessary steps, with or without force, and with or without the assistance of law enforcement officers, by warrant or other legal process, as he may deem necessary in order to bring that senator to the Senate chambers so that the Senate may convene with a quorum of no less than 20 senators."

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/wisconsin-gopers-threaten-c
ontempt-for-fugitive-dems.php?ref=tn


By the way, with regard to that one:
Quote:

But whether the contempt measure is constitutional remains unclear. The state Constitution prohibits the arrest of lawmakers while the legislature is in session, except for "treason, felony and breach of the peace." Whether Wisconsin law enforcement would be allowed jurisdiction in Illinois to detain the missing lawmakers is also unclear.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/03/03/wisconsin.budget/

Quote:

Staff members of the 14 Wisconsin Senate Democrats who left town 11 days ago rather than vote on an anti-union bill will now have to get their pay authorized by the Republican leader. Republican Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald said Monday that he would take over the duties of reviewing and approving Democratic staff members' timesheets. Fitzgerald is also not allowing Democratic lawmakers or their staff members to use Capitol copiers.
http://www.fox11online.com/dpp/news/wisconsin/state-senator-scott-fitz
gerald-trying-to-increase-pressure-on-missing-democrats


From the same article:
Quote:

Wednesday's measure could also force missing Democrats to forfeit their parking spaces


I guess either they don’t realize how stupid they’re making themselves look, or else they figure their base will agree with their actions so, hey, ho, what the hell...if it works....

On the other hand, nice to see there's a recall petition out on Walker. Here's hoping it succeeds. Then the people will TRULY "have spoken"!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, March 3, 2011 1:00 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


Politicians, yuck, you're right Niki, using tricks to get that limit-public-bargaining bill passed isn't fair or right. If the people really want to vote for that then I guess that's their choice, but using trickery to get it passed is yucky. I guess we'll have to see what happens, maybe it will go really badly and so it will get revoted on again next year or something and it will get repealed?

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, March 3, 2011 1:32 PM

THEHAPPYTRADER


Quote:

Okay, so I’ve long known Republicans are quite adept at dirty tricks and “misspeaking”...but I never realized they were apparently born without even the concept of conscience or morality. I’m getting quite an education lately:

Under “dirty tricks”:

Quote:
Senate Bill 5, which will limit most collective bargaining rights for public employees in Ohio, bar all strikes under penalty of law, and ban binding arbitration, just passed the Ohio State Senate by one vote, 17-16. Republicans have a 23-10 hold on the State Senate, and six of them dropped off this anti-union bill.

In order to make it work, Ohio Republicans had to shuffle two committees to ensure they had the votes to pass the bill out. They had to take Bill Zeitz off the Insurance, Commerce and Labor Committee to get the bill out of there. Then, they had to yank Scott Oelslager off the Rules Committee to avoid a deadlock there.

http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/03/02/sb-5-passes-ohio-senate-after-r
epublicans-reconfigure-committees
.

So they had to switch to of their own who were against the measure with two who were FOR the measure to get the votes they needed in two committees. Yeah, it’s legal under the rules, but THEY wrote the rules. I call foul.



This is as far as I got before I stopped reading. Not only is your first remark blatantly partisan and illogical, your own quote disproves it, because a significant number of republicans voted against what you perceive as immorality.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, March 3, 2011 1:40 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Okay, so I’ve long known Republicans are quite adept at dirty tricks and “misspeaking”...but I never realized they were apparently born without even the concept of conscience or morality.

Niki, you know that Democrats are quite adept at dirty tricks and "misspeaking" and were apparently born without even the concept of conscience or morality too, right?




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, March 4, 2011 2:18 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Speaking of Dirty Tricks and Pettiness.

From this URL:
http://www.monbiot.com/2010/12/13/reclaim-the-cyber-commons/
Quote:

Reading comment threads on the Guardian’s sites and elsewhere on the web, two patterns jump out at me. The first is that discussions of issues in which there’s little money at stake tend to be a lot more civilised than debates about issues where companies stand to lose or gain billions: such as climate change, public health and corporate tax avoidance. These are often characterised by amazing levels of abuse and disruption.

Articles about the environment are hit harder by such tactics than any others. I love debate, and I often wade into the threads beneath my columns. But it’s a depressing experience, as instead of contesting the issues I raise, many of those who disagree bombard me with infantile abuse, or just keep repeating a fiction, however often you discredit it. This ensures that an intelligent discussion is almost impossible – which appears to be the point(10).

The second pattern is the strong association between this tactic and a certain set of views: pro-corporate, anti-tax, anti-regulation. Both traditional conservatives and traditional progressives tend be more willing to discuss an issue than these right-wing libertarians, many of whom seek instead to shut down debate.

So what’s going on? I’m not suggesting that most of the people trying to derail these discussions are paid to do so, though I would be surprised if none were. I’m suggesting that some of the efforts to prevent intelligence from blooming seem to be organised, and that neither website hosts nor other commenters know how to respond.

For his film (Astro)Turf Wars, Taki Oldham secretly recorded a training session organised by a rightwing libertarian group called American Majority. The trainer, Austin James, was instructing Tea Party members on how to “manipulate the medium”(11). This is what he told them:

“Here’s what I do. I get on Amazon; I type in “Liberal Books”. I go through and I say “one star, one star, one star”. The flipside is you go to a conservative/ libertarian whatever, go to their products and give them five stars. … This is where your kids get information: Rotten Tomatoes, Flixster. These are places where you can rate movies. So when you type in “Movies on Healthcare”, I don’t want Michael Moore’s to come up, so I always give it bad ratings. I spend about 30 minutes a day, just click, click, click, click. … If there’s a place to comment, a place to rate, a place to share information, you have to do it. That’s how you control the online dialogue and give our ideas a fighting chance.”

Over 75% of the funding for American Majority, which hosted this training session, comes from the Sam Adams Alliance(12). In 2008, the year in which American Majority was founded, 88% of the alliance’s money came from a single donation, of $3.7m(13). A group which trains rightwing libertarians to distort online democratic processes, in other words, was set up with funding from a person or company with a very large wallet.

The internet is a remarkable gift, which has granted us one of the greatest democratic opportunities since universal suffrage. We’re in danger of losing this global commons as it comes under assault from an army of trolls and flacks, many of them covertly organised or trained. The question for all of us – the Guardian, other websites, everyone who benefits from this resource – is what we intend to do about it. It’s time we fought back and reclaimed the internet for what it does best: exploring issues, testing ideas, opening the debate.


I acknowledge your point, CTS - very much so since I've repeatedly posted the Groves article on that here, but as of late, the majority of that bullshit by far is coming from one direction, and not just here, but everygoddamnwhere I look on the internet...

Imagine if someone covered your whole neighborhood with slime, every single inch as far as your eye could see - versus the guy who spit on your sidewalk ?

Now, politicians as a whole are sociopaths, otherwise they'd have a real job, but it isn't them what concern me so since without the stupid fucking enablers, with dumb shits who will follow their orders like little worker drones, they're just one big mouth running, and it's not like they'd ever do their own dirty work, oh hell no.

Ergo, it is their fucking shocktroops I mean to kneecap, and for a FACT, the worst, most vicious, dangerous morons of the bunch all come from one side, gleefully zipping up the jackboot like the Jackals that they are.

Not that the other side don't have em, but by comparison they're pathetic, wussified and incompetent, not to mention too busy flaming each OTHER to be a significant threat.

Nor do other political vectors lack em, in fact I personally have been called the nearest thing Anarchists have to a jackbooted stormtrooper....

But it's a matter of threat value and interpretation, not right or wrong, leastways the fashion in which I see it, and that threat comes primarily from one side.

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, March 4, 2011 2:42 AM

DREAMTROVE


Frem,

you may not admit to being on the left, but it's affecting you perception. The attacks come from both sides. Even RWED is equi-troll dominated, even with Kaneman, but there are a couple of general rules I find work for anything:

The posters in an area tend to be more comfortable on home turf. If the article or forum has a sided political slant, those not in line with it will feel more threatened, and will be more prone to trolling.

The left and right are not exactly alike. Generalizing overly here:

The right will resort to treating their opponents like morons, personally attacking and using negative and violent rhetoric.

The left will treat their opponents as evil, and attack collectively, calling groups of people nasty things and using excessive vulgarity.

As I say this I see that this behavior actually reflects an extreme of inner left and right beliefs, such as right wing competitiveness and left with collectivism.

As I said, it's a generalization, but I've noticed the patterns are very strong. The importance of these subtle differences is that once you identify something with "trolls" you tend to think the others who post it are more likely to be trolls, and those who don't as less likely to be trolls. If that thing is specific to the left or right, then you're more inclined to see just left or right trolls than your own political slant would show, and in addition to the slant created by the forum or topic that represents "home turf."

In general, I find trolls cannot resist disagreeing with everything, or posting about everything they disagree with, and when they do so repeatedly, they become very negative people, and it is difficult for them to maintain civility. If they do this long enough, due to their contempt for all they are posting against they come to believe that they are above everyone, mocking them, and do not realize that it is they who are most dragged in to their own net.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, March 4, 2011 3:20 AM

FREMDFIRMA



That's awful amusing coming from you, Dreamtrove, who manages to somehow look the other way, or not notice even some of the most heinous conduct on one end of the spectrum, WHILE lambasting the other viciously for something not even half as offensive.

And where exactly did you get the idea that I am impartial or even pretend to be ?

I make it pretty damn clear I have an agenda, to the point where I FREAKIN LAMPSHADE IT, if not resort to outright parody, despite being in fact, deadly serious about it - and happen to be blatantly up front about it in hopes of *not* being taken seriously.

Also, don't try to shovel a pretense of impartiality to me, okay, that's one bill of goods I never did buy, and frankly am sick of you trying to sell me while you weasel-word and plea bargain your way around the monstrous conduct of enablers on one side while decrying those on the other, I've tried to be polite about it, to be subtle, but frankly you wanna talk about perceptions, welllll....

Come back and have that discussion when you're not busy licking "tea party" jackboots, ok ?

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, March 4, 2011 10:15 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Oh yes, and another thing...

You reallY think I have ANY illusions about these people ?

TODAY




1968




The more things change...
I don't *CARE* what "side" they're supposedly on - it ain't mine and it never will be!
http://www.iww.org/culture/official/preamble.shtml
Quote:

The working class and the employing class have nothing in common. There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among millions of the working people and the few, who make up the employing class, have all the good things of life.


And relevant to that, I had some local corpie in here this morning wanting to hire us for *nudge-nudge-wink-wink* "loss prevention" (union intimidation) at one of his plants, and he wasn't what-so-ever any kind of subtle about it, or what his intentions were.

You can prolly imagine his reaction when I started quoting Big Bill Haywood.
Quote:

A detective is the lowest, meanest and most contemptible thing that either creeps or crawls, a thing to loathe and despise. ... That you may know how small a detective is, you can take a hair and punch the pith out of it and in the hollow hair you can put the hearts and souls of 40,000 detectives and they will still rattle. You can pour them out on the surface of your thumbnail and the skin of a gnat will make an umbrella for them.
When a detective dies, he goes so low that he has to climb a ladder to get into Hell— and he is not a welcome guest there. When his Satanic Majesty sees him coming, he says to his imps, "Go get a big bucket of pitch and a lot of sulphur, give them to that fellow and put him outside. Let him start a Hell of his own. We don't want him in here, starting trouble."


We're NOT the fucking Pinkertons, thank you muchly (1)

And I practice what I preach, you might remember I let 2/3rds of my crew walk when they got greedy and decided to throw in with DepHomeSec and/or the TSA - very few of em could stomach it in the end, just under half returned, begging for their old jobs back, and after much thought about it, were rejected due to lack of trust and potentially being ringers/infiltrators - and most of the other was either fired when they balked at some of the shit they were asked to do, or quit in disgust.

I didn't hit them with a no-compete, pin them with an NDA, cause frankly if some of these other incompetent clowns wanna copy our policies and procedures, or bait some of my better-trained personnel away with higher wages, MORE POWER TO THEM, reducing the amount of incompetence and corruption in this biz benefits me and mine directly by increasing the value of our "product" in public perception... and it's not like I got any damn shortage of applicants either - if they wanted to collectively bargain they're welcome to do so, and I'll even pull out the books for them to go over, if they wanna discuss payrates, cause *I* make less than they do - rather than play the CEO game I "pay" myself for hours worked, and at a lower rate than them cause I am slower, less physically fit, and a bit on the lazy side.

Anyhows, the only use a Morlock like me has for the damn Eloi... is as FOOD.
Quote:

Eat the rich, yeah eat the rich, don't you know that life is a bitch!
-Krokus



-Frem
(1) For more about security vs labor, this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_spies

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, March 4, 2011 10:29 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Okay, so I’ve long known Republicans are quite adept at dirty tricks and “misspeaking”...but I never realized they were apparently born without even the concept of conscience or morality.


I originally thought that this topic was about a complicated discussion on morality and the 'nature versus nurture' debate.

I have often found that liberal infants display a highly developed sense of morality, one that changes little as they grow into adulthood. Liberals want what they want when they want it and when they don't get it they cry loudly. They are often incapable of caring for their own basic needs, food, clothing, etc. They take little or no resposibility for the messes they make, but in as loud a voice as possible demand other clean their "enviroment".
Quote:


I’m getting quite an education lately:


You must not be in Wisconsin.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.
"I would rather not ignore your contributions." Niki2, 2010.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, March 4, 2011 10:58 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Conservatives want what they want when they want it and when they don't get it they cry loudly. They are often incapable of caring for their own basic needs, food, clothing, etc. They take little or no resposibility for the messes they make, but in as loud a voice as possible demand other clean their "enviroment".

It works either way, doesn't it - inheriting wealth earned from the abuse and exploitation of those unable to prevent it STILL qualifies as being incapable of caring for their own needs, and ordering the servant staff around qualifies as the latter.

Again, not one dimes worth of difference, save that Conservative tantrums are usually more violent individually, while Liberal ones are more violent collectively.

Of course, one COULD simply ignore them, save for the damn fools willing to take their orders and enforce their will - of which, you are one.

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, March 4, 2011 11:11 AM

DREAMTROVE


All I see is a bunch of little blocks. No letters, just box box box, like [] [] [] or something. The whole site. Is anyone else having this problem?

Three boxes for "yes" two boxes for "no"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, March 5, 2011 1:56 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Of COURSE it’s partisan...i's bitching about dirty tricks and pettiness. I’ve been real clear I’m an avowed liberal. But it goes beyond that. This time in our country, it’s carte blanche to say literally ANYTHING about Obama, however untrue, and I’ve never seen a President treated with so little respect in my lifetime. It’s the blatantness and ugly overtones (or hell, just TONES) that offends me. Legislators no doubt pull shit like saying they have to do something “because of the budget”, and swap their caucus around to pass bills, but the rest of it is just plain sick. And they KNOW they can get away with it Nobody on the right is ever gonna call ‘em on it. It would take an idiot (or someone so desperate to believe it) to believe that Huckabee “meant Indonesia”...like I said, it’s just like a trial trick; say something in front of the jury that you wouldn’t be allowed to say, have the judge tell the jury to disregard it, but what you wanted to achieve is already done, jury can’t “disregard” any more than those who are looking for any opportunity to make Obama “someone different from us” will disregard the Mau-Mau shit, etc. They probably think “yeah, he had to say it was a mistake, but we know otherwise”. It’s playing to the worst, basest and most shameful aspect of people.

A “significant number” of Republicans? “Republicans have a 23-10 hold on the State Senate, and six of them dropped off this anti-union bill”. Yes, given Republicans stick together and aren’t like the “herding-cats” Democrats, it means a lot that six of them broke ranks. But in my opinion, if they had consciences, NONE of them would have supported it; it’s as blatant an attempt to bust unions as I ever remember seeing. They’re not representing their constituents, period.

CTTS, of course I know all politicians play these games...see first paragraph for how I feel about the situation these days. Frem said it:
Quote:

as of late, the majority of that bullshit by far is coming from one direction, and not just here, but everygoddamnwhere I look on the internet...”
I’ve experienced the same thing, virtually ever since Obama ran for office. It’s a real attitude of “no holes barred” against him, and it sickens me. I may not agree with him, but this kind of personal vendetta is unconscionable.

As for “RWED is equi-troll”, I have to question YOUR perception. Can you honestly say that those on the left here are nearly as vicious, personally attacking and ugly as Kane, Raptor, Wulf and their ilk??? I certainly don’t see it; I see snarks and nastiness, but not even slightly to the same degree! How you can say “treat their opponents as evil, and attack collectively, calling groups of people nasty things and using excessive vulgarity” doesn’t EXACTLY describe Kane, Raptor and the rest is totally beyond me. WHERE do you see the same kind of ugliness from the left, saying horrible things about “your mother should have aborted” and the other filthy things Kane, and sometimes Raptor and Wulf, say???

As for the right “resort to treating their opponents like morons, personally attacking and using negative and violent rhetoric”, I see it more as BOTH sides doing that...tho’ you’re right, from my observation it is usually the right that resorts to violent rhetoric. I think the left-wingers here are quite happy to treat their opponents as morons, personally attack and use negative rhetoric, but “evil”, collective going after (which both sides do) and using excessive vulgarity is what I’ve seen from our righties.
Quote:

once you identify something with "trolls" you tend to think the others who post it are more likely to be trolls
I disagree with that wholeheartedly. I know who to expect trollish behavior from, so yes, I pretty much ignore them, but if/when someone reasonable makes the same point or agrees with them, I take into account the source and respond in the same manner. Some here either choose to or let themselves be triggered; I wish to hell they wouldn’t, but that’s not my responsibility. I certainly don’t (and I don’t see others) treating points as coming from “all trolls” when one troll has made it.

I do not find that our trolls “cannot resist disagreeing with everything”. I see them going after ANYTHING left, or sometimes even moderate; they come into discussions about something entirely different to raise their hand and say “look at me, I’m MEAN”, and it’s usually lefties who respond, but didn’t start, the situation.

Hero, where you got that this might be a “complicated discussion on morality and the 'nature versus nurture' debate” from the title “Dirty Tricks and Pettiness” is totally beyond me.

And Frem’s right about it going both ways (except I’d take the “in as loud a voice as possible demand other clean their "enviroment".” bit out of the righties...that’s definitely not been their focus.

And lastly, no, DT, I didn’t have that problem.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, March 5, 2011 3:34 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


All politicians are slimy. But this whole take-away-the-collective-bargaining-rights-and-the-right-to-go-on-strike business being put in by the repubs is angering me. I tend to lean right on "moral" issues and left on "social" issues, both sides can make me angry, this current situation is so unfair.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 6, 2011 5:29 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
It’s a real attitude of “no holes barred” against him, and it sickens me. I may not agree with him, but this kind of personal vendetta is unconscionable.

C'mon. You didn't see this kind of personal vendetta against Bush? Really? And Clinton before him? And Bush Sr. before him?

Both sides do it, Niki. It is just the Dem's turn to be on the receiving end.

It's a nasty playground, with 2 gangs of bullies. They take turns taking it and dishing it out. Pointing to the egregiousness of one side over the other seems, well, pointless.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 6, 2011 6:56 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:

Okay, so I’ve long known DEMOCRATS are quite adept at dirty tricks and “misspeaking”...but I never realized they were apparently born without even the concept of conscience or morality. I’m getting quite an education lately:




Fixed that for you, Niki.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 6, 2011 8:26 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


CTTS: I saw shit thrown at Presidents all the way back to Goldwater (which I have shamefacedly adfmitted I WORKED for...parents were Republican and I was only a teenager; I became “conscious” shortly thereafter—that’s my excuse and I’m sticking with it!). LBJ, Reagan, Carter, even Nixon: NONE of them came under the kind of ugliness I’ve seen aimed at Obama. Vitriol is one thing, but the intent is to make him the “different”; not of this country, a foreigner, at times even a “terrorist” or terrorist sympathizer. Not “crook” sympathizer; much, much uglier than that. His half-color is the perfect excuse to feed into people who are still racist (whichever party); his potential “Muslimness” exceeds any attacks I’ve seen on any of those Presidents. The whole thing plays on something ugly which still exists in America; not partisan hatred, too many idiots are given to that and always have. But this “fear him because he’s different”, that they’re utilizing to absolutely a brilliant extreme is different. Americans are afraid of Muslim terrorists; some hate people of any other color; some both; to play into him being “one of them” is disgusting.

The way Obama’s opponents have been able to say all the outrageous things they do with impunity is the other unconscionable thing; you may be believe it’s like this “all the time”; I do not. You may believe it’s okay to say all these things publicly and incite people to think like this; I do not. We see things differently.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 6, 2011 12:41 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


re trolls

I see a couple of things on this forum.

One are posters who only post vicious attacks, often personal.

The other is when people are accused of being trolls when they disagree or become rude.

Then there is PN. Nuff said.

Wiki describes a troll as

....someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[2] In addition to the offending poster, the noun troll can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in "that was an excellent troll you posted". While the term troll and its associated action trolling are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective, with trolling being used to describe intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. For example, recent media accounts have used the term troll to describe "a person who defaces internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families."

Personally, I think troll has become another label used to describe 'someone who disagrees with me' but I believe there are one or two real trolls on this forum.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 6, 2011 1:45 PM

KANEMAN


I think you are a troll..



NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, March 7, 2011 10:06 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


...and therrrre he comes, our undisputed trollish troll: "....someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response."

I think things get heated on all forms of internet communication; if people merely disagree, unfortunately it started getting heated and personal, but I don't think the term "troll" applies at all. Which won't change anything...


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, March 7, 2011 10:10 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
You may believe it’s okay to say all these things publicly and incite people to think like this; I do not.

I don't think it is morally okay. No.

But I do believe it should be legal to say morally abhorrent things. Yes.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL