REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Chavez agrees with me

POSTED BY: DREAMTROVE
UPDATED: Friday, September 29, 2006 15:33
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3107
PAGE 1 of 2

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:40 AM

DREAMTROVE


Bush is a democrat




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:52 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


I don't know DT. You seem to use the word 'democrat' to mean "anything you don't like". If it's bad, no mater what the form, it must be democrat, by definition. Large, spendthrift, reckless, crony-driven and intrusive? Democrat. Smaller, frugal, cautious, international capitalist and distant? Democrat. You also said the same thing about the press during the Clinton administration - it didn't work the way you wanted. So though it was in OBVIOUS collusion with the republican agenda, you called it Democrat.

You've got to stop redefining words to suit your idée fixee.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:58 AM

FUTUREMRSFILLION


Well how we know that Chavez agreed with you. I mean did he say "You devil" while smirking, winking and tapping Bush on the chin as in "You are the man". Or did he see Bush, point at him and run screaming from the room yelling SATAN?


Sorry, been wondering this since I saw the headline on the net - Chavez calls Bush devil


----
Bestower of Titles, Designer of Tshirts, Maker of Mottos, Keeper of the Pyre

I am on The List. We are The Forsaken and we aim to burn!
"We don't fear the reaper"



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:02 AM

MAVOURNEEN


Regardless of what he said, I don't know if I'd ever admit to being on any "side" Hugo Chavez is on. That man's a few fries short of a Happy Meal.

"Have you ever been with a Warrior Woman?"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:05 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


As I mentioned in a different thread, this bit of complete NONSENSE is headlined - using the exact same words - in every US news carrier. Amazing. The independent fourth estate all in synch and in chorus on this one item.

pisses me off

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:07 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Quote:

Originally posted by Mavourneen:
Regardless of what he said, I don't know if I'd ever admit to being on any "side" Hugo Chavez is on. That man's a few fries short of a Happy Meal.

And that's exactly the plan. Do you REALLY think this trifle is worth being headlined, let alone in the exact same words in every major carrier? Or didn't you get that it's propaganda?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 10:28 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Of course no one gets that it's propaganda.

People, y'all gotta stop thinking of the press as anything other than mouthpieces for varioous officials. Do you all still think reporters actually investigate anything?? NOPE! They sit in some conference room (or in the Green Zone) and get the latest poop from the Press Scy/ General/ Head Dog Catcher. That means that the WH controls thru selection.

We should have a thread:
And now, NOT in the news today!

For example, how's Bolivia doing with their natural gas nationalization? What's the latest in Peru? And what about that poppy crop in Afghnanistan? I've heard its a big one!

Instead, we get "Woman bites dog" and "Hagritay's dad dead" and "We're promoting democracy (snicker) in Iraq".

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 10:43 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


How about this for news?

http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/scientists-shocked-by-arctic-melt/
2006/09/21/1158431791746.html


European scientists voiced shock today as they viewed pictures which showed Arctic ice cover had disappeared so much last month that a ship could sail unhindered from Europe's most northerly outpost to the North Pole.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 10:50 AM

FELLOWTRAVELER


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
And what about that poppy crop in Afghnanistan? I've heard its a big one!



At last, some good news outta' Afghananistan! Hey, drug lords have to feed their families too...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:13 AM

FELLOWTRAVELER


Sorry, but just for the record, Chavez is not the boogeyman. Being opposed the US doesn't make one evil. He was Democratically elected and has done some great things for his country.

For example:
Quote:


During Chávez's presidency from 1999 to 2004, per-capita GDP dropped 1–2 %, but with the help of rising oil prices, the end of the oil strike, and strong consumption growth, recent economic activity under Chávez has been robust. GDP growth rates were 18% in 2004, 9% in 2005, and 9.6% in the first half of 2006, with the private sector growing at a 10.3% clip. From 2004 to the first half of 2006, non-petroleum sectors of the economy showed growth rates greater than 10%. Datos reports real income grew by 137% between 2003 and Q1 2006. Official poverty figures dropped by 4.9%.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Chavez

So, he hates the US. That doesn't make him considerably different from 90% of other Third World leaders. And it's not like we don't deserve their contempt. Check out how US oil companies exploited Venezuela's natural resources for billions of dollars and payed less than 1% of that back in taxes. Very simular circumstances exist in Africa and we will reap what we sow.

Maybe he is bat-shit crazy, but so is our guy and he hasn't produced these kind of results...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:38 PM

DREAMTROVE


Huh.

I thought a minority of people would get the joke. Turns out to be no one.

Democrat, in this case, is represented by "donkey"

Rue

Did you even watch the video?


Besides the obvious Chavez is off his rocker, funny, a commie with cows, and right about Bush bring an ass.,


Rue

You got to stop using this offensive term "idée fixee" - I suspect I'm a great deal more open minded than you and citizen who use it. You're becoming the Auraptors of your side.


Mavourneen

Quote:

That man's a few fries short of a Happy Meal.


Thank you. You got the point. This was the point, my jackass joke aside.

Funny though. Like a junta with money.



Signym,

Quote:

Of course no one gets that it's propaganda.


I hope that you get that Chavez is progaganda also. He's hardly the opposition to Bush-style ideas, just to Bush personally. I Bush started calling Ahmadinejad a donkey, thought, it would be a lot more entertaining.

The Bush idea that Chavez added to his repertoire in this piece was the most impressive: "Bring it on"


FT,

No, Chavez isn't evil, but he is a jackass. As long as he's going to hate us, we at least get to laugh at him. My favorite from last year was when he said that Halloween was a decadent and hollow tradition and "Pumpkins show their emptiness."

This reminds me of some of the more up moments of the cold war.

For the record, Chavez is a schmuck. He is essentially a Chinese puppet, and the Venezuelan people are as poor now as when Condi Rice was stealing their oil. If there were a real revolution in which the actual people (not govt.) of Venezuela saw oil profits, I'd reconsider, but there's just been a change of players at the corruption table, not an actual revolution.

Evo Morales I have more respect for. I think that he gave a decent speech, though I didn't catch it all because ABC started doing their best to obscure it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:43 PM

DREAMTROVE


Rue,

And another, not to take you task, but...

I don't complain if you take Bush down for pronouncing a word wrong, but if I mention any of Clinton's myriad evil deeds suddenly I'm a partisan pawn? Whatever.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:06 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


DT,

I really don't have time to go googling. All I asked for was a few links. If you really wanted me to 'get' your points, it's not too much to ask, since you've already done the research and all. Orherwise, I will consider them idees fixee, since you seem bound and determined to fit every kind of peg into your particular round hole.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:12 PM

RIGHTEOUS9



I like Chavez, at least what I've seen of him. He is heavy on the rhetoric, which is so often way misrepresented in the media, but I don't think he's crazy.

He's managed to stay afloat in an environment that should have crushed him for not selling out his people and his oil for American corpoarations, and it seems to me that his rhetoric is coming at an opportune time...a time when America is losing face and power around the world, and Chavez is throwing the weight he has into a galvanizing opposition to our imperialism, by yes, courting some unpleasant regimes. But when have we ever been above that ourselves?

And I don't think Chavez does hate the American People. He brokered a deal with us for low gas costs for our poor during the raping we were facing at the hands of our own companies.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:20 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


DT,

PLEASE. Look up basic facts before you make claims that aren't true!

"(Chavez)'s hardly the opposition to Bush-style ideas ... and the Venezuelan people are as poor now as when Condi Rice was stealing their oil. "

"Terry Gibbs, a political scientist at Cape Breton University, Sydney, Nova Scotia travels frequently to Venezuela in an effort to understand the Chavez government’s so-called “Bolivarian Revolution”. In an article in the current Third World Quarterly, she details how Venezuela’s social programs ... largely financed by Petroleos de Venezuela, are benefiting the poor in Venezuela.

By 2005, Gibbs notes, the Barrio Adentro Mission (program) had underwritten the placement of “more than 20,000 Cuban doctors, health workers and physical trainers” in poor communities in Venezuela and made medical services available to 17 million Venezuelans who previously had no access to health care. Gibbs adds that “in addition to being able to access clinics, poor Venezuelans can now purchase drugs at an 85 per cent discount”. To reduce dependence on the Cuban health workers who return to Cuba after working for several years in Venezuela, Chavez’ Ministry of Health is currently training about 1100 Venezuelan physicians and 2500 other health care workers.

Turning to education, Gibbs writes that by employing a Cuban-designed program that teaches basic literacy in seven weeks the Chavez government has reduced the country’s rate of illiteracy by 90 per cent. “This program”, she explains, “has also enabled the 1.2 million people who have become literate to continue their studies through grade six”, and also to acquire computer skills.

Gibbs points out that under Chavez 3500 Venezuelan schools have received major renovations, the number of days that many of the country’s poorest students attend classes has been increased from 170 to 200, some 770,000 adults have completed their secondary education, and the Chavez government has decentralized higher education, opening the multi-campus Bolivarian University of Venezuela (UBV), where students get a liberal arts education and train for professions such as law and journalism while attending classes in lecture halls that were formerly the luxurious offices of Venezuela’s oil elite.

The situation of Venezuela’s majority poor population is also eased by Petroleos de Venezuela’s policy of keeping the price of gas in Venezuela at 14 cents a gallon, far lower even than the subsidized prices that consumers pay in other oil producing countries.

In the conclusion of her article Terry Gibbs portrays Venezuela’s “Bolivarian alternative” as a different take on globalization, one that “involves a redistribution of wealth to the poorest countries” and is “challenging the control of domestic elites” throughout Latin America."

-------------------------------------------
The same content can be found in Wikipedia.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:34 PM

FELLOWTRAVELER


Quote:

No, Chavez isn't evil, but he is a jackass. As long as he's going to hate us, we at least get to laugh at him.


I couldn't agree more. I was, unfortunately, responding more to the hyperbole I have heard the pundits use to respond to Chavez's (just as hyperbole filled) speech.. I find it hard to bite my tongue sometimes. Sorry.

Quote:

For the record, Chavez is a schmuck. He is essentially a Chinese puppet, and the Venezuelan people are as poor now as when Condi Rice was stealing their oil. If there were a real revolution in which the actual people (not govt.) of Venezuela saw oil profits, I'd reconsider, but there's just been a change of players at the corruption table, not an actual revolution.


Admittedly, when 100% of the population is dirt poor, a 4.9% decrease in the poverty rate just ain't that much. And I'm sure Chavez and his buddies are getting filthy rich from corruption. I just thought I would point out that things are moving, slowly, in a better direction for the impoverished people of Venezuela and that the US is somewhat responsible for that impoverishment, as it is in many developing countries and this is, in my opinion, largely the reason we are so detested by much of the Third World.

I'm not saying the US is an Evil Empire, either. Every successful nation has a black stain on it's soul. In Capitalism, there are winners and losers. We've been the winners for a long time and the losers are getting pissed!


Edit- Like nobody is getting rich on the corruption in the US government...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:38 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


DT- You really don't have a clue about some things, do you? It seems to me that you are so wrapped up in the notion that "government is evil" that ANY government- even when it is doing demonstrable good- is evil. Because it's just... evil... just because it is.


See my signature:

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:43 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


DT,

One more thing .... mebee I'm a leetl teechy.
YES, I watched the video. Chavez is known for his speeches and his 'common man' approach. And yes, there was a joke in there. So I apologize for jumping all over you for this one little thing.

But there is a subtext to everything you post that colors even your jokes. Bush is a democrat. Clinton (either one) is a democrat. Rumsfeld is a democrat. They're AAALLL democrats !!! AAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHhhhhh ..... RUN FOR THE HILLS !!

Government BAD ! Business GOOD ! Chavez helping the poor with government really BAD !

BAD ! BAD Chavez ! Let's call bad Chavez names ! OOOOhhh. Let's make fun of the bad government man! THAT'S fun. That's GOOD !

----------------------------------------

And it's just as pointless and childish and unrelated to what he's actually doing as that.

----------------------------------------


BTW - I would still like to get links. You made all sorts of claims about Clinton which I don't have time to follow up on. So I am hoping you'll provide links !



NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:53 PM

GINOBIFFARONI


Quote:

Originally posted by Righteous9:

I like Chavez, at least what I've seen of him. He is heavy on the rhetoric, which is so often way misrepresented in the media, but I don't think he's crazy.

He's managed to stay afloat in an environment that should have crushed him for not selling out his people and his oil for American corpoarations, and it seems to me that his rhetoric is coming at an opportune time...a time when America is losing face and power around the world, and Chavez is throwing the weight he has into a galvanizing opposition to our imperialism, by yes, courting some unpleasant regimes. But when have we ever been above that ourselves?

And I don't think Chavez does hate the American People. He brokered a deal with us for low gas costs for our poor during the raping we were facing at the hands of our own companies.






I wonder if the rhetoric is a cultural thing... or something to do with politics down there. It seems most South American politicians I have heard have similar styles.

I do like what Chavez said about leading from the front... If all wartime leaders did this, either negotiations would be helped by the leader seeing the results of his actions... and failing that the leader ( in my opinion ) would earn some respect. A throwback to an different time no doubt.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 6:39 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Dreamtrove:

You got to stop using this offensive term "idée fixee" - I suspect I'm a great deal more open minded than you and citizen who use it. You're becoming the Auraptors of your side.

Lets see, you insult me on a thread I've never posted on, just because, well I assume your aiming for a flame war.

You aren't open minded, you're arrogant, yes I get it already, you're the most intelligent person who has ever lived. The difference between you and me is I require evidence to be convinced of something, you require it makes you look clever or says what you want to hear. Just because you are prepared to believe any peice of crazy shit just because you said it doesn't mean I am. It also doesn't mean you're open minded, it means you're a mug.

Oh and too intelligent thinking folk "I'm right you're wrong, get with the program, look at me I'm so great" isn't considered an intelligent argument. Obviously to you it is, but there we go.

You are acting more like a Troll everyday, you start a thread clearly designed to be inflammatory, I await your next one "all FireFly fans are scum", wonder if people will get the joke there.

Then when it's not inflammed enough you go ahead and attempt to insult people who haven't even posted here.

Well DreamTroll, until such time as you prove otherwise I will be treating your comments with the utter contempt they deserve.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 10:55 AM

DREAMTROVE


I said I had no links because this was pre-me-having-internet. I intend to make a conspiracy site to prove that the Bush amind *is* the clinton admin, and will be the hillary admin, and then maybe the jeb admin, at some point, and it will be full of links. I have 2 tons of work to do at the moment though.

My main point in all the evil democrats in bush is that I want you people over on the left to recognize the enemy within as much as i want auraptor and all on the right to. I think good people will never defeat evil until we are united against it.

As long as the left blames only the long term conservative movement for the evil, it will never get to that point, which would be, to the truth.

Chavez is helping the poor? What planet are you on? Chavez is doing more for the American poor than he's doing for Venezuela. Venezualans would be rich if they had control of their own country. Chavez is just as much of a China pawn (he's giving them free oil) as he is a castro pawn (he's giving him free oil too) more than Caldera was ours.

Chavez's treatment of his native population, his environment, his electoral system, his private sector businesses and his own people are about as loving as any soviet leader. Almost.

I don't think he's the anti-christ, or evil, he's just a blind follower of the religion called socialism. A failed ideology with a lot of noble claims, and no noble results. "Sure, we'll help the needy, as long as you give us all of your money and absolute unchecked authoritarian power." And yet people still fall for it.

Morales as I said, I have more hope for. He talked about upping Bolivian business and the Bolivian economy, standard of living, and I think he was much more angry, and "I'm doing this for my people" and much less "Wow, I'm king now, China made me king." Who he seems most like to me is Hamid Karzai, who had that look visavis Bush. By contrast, Talibani strikes me as genuinely concerned about his people.

I don't think this is a partisan issue, as Morales and Chavez are the same actual party, and Talibani and Karzai are the same defacto party, ie., pro-us.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 11:03 AM

DREAMTROVE


Citizen

Whatever.

You see my point. I don't dislike you, I just said you're becoming an auraptor of the left. And like a muslim who has been called violent, you miss the irony of your actions.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 11:54 AM

RIGHTEOUS9



Dreamtrove - I would like to be enlightened with specifics as to how his ideology is hurting his people, since you are going to claim it.

Not that I doubt you have specifics, but without them your argument is less convincing than Rue's, who posted examples of Chavez's contribution to Venezuela.

What do you mean by control of their own country? You mean like we have? Cuz we're all so bloody rich in america, sporting the highest poverty rate among rich nations.

Chavez was elected by the way, and the validity of his election was less in doubt than our own. He let foreign poll monitors actually watch his election.

Calling him a pawn of Cuba and China doesn't make much sense either. What makes him a pawn?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:27 PM

SPACELIPS


Quote:

Originally posted by dreamtrove:
I said I had no links because this was pre-me-having-internet. I intend to make a conspiracy site to prove that the Bush amind *is* the clinton admin, and will be the hillary admin, and then maybe the jeb admin, at some point, and it will be full of links. I have 2 tons of work to do at the moment though.

My main point in all the evil democrats in bush is that I want you people over on the left to recognize the enemy within as much as i want auraptor and all on the right to. I think good people will never defeat evil until we are united against it.

As long as the left blames only the long term conservative movement for the evil, it will never get to that point, which would be, to the truth.

Chavez is helping the poor? What planet are you on? Chavez is doing more for the American poor than he's doing for Venezuela. Venezualans would be rich if they had control of their own country. Chavez is just as much of a China pawn (he's giving them free oil) as he is a castro pawn (he's giving him free oil too) more than Caldera was ours.

Chavez's treatment of his native population, his environment, his electoral system, his private sector businesses and his own people are about as loving as any soviet leader. Almost.

I don't think he's the anti-christ, or evil, he's just a blind follower of the religion called socialism. A failed ideology with a lot of noble claims, and no noble results. "Sure, we'll help the needy, as long as you give us all of your money and absolute unchecked authoritarian power." And yet people still fall for it.

Morales as I said, I have more hope for. He talked about upping Bolivian business and the Bolivian economy, standard of living, and I think he was much more angry, and "I'm doing this for my people" and much less "Wow, I'm king now, China made me king." Who he seems most like to me is Hamid Karzai, who had that look visavis Bush. By contrast, Talibani strikes me as genuinely concerned about his people.

I don't think this is a partisan issue, as Morales and Chavez are the same actual party, and Talibani and Karzai are the same defacto party, ie., pro-us.



New here, so pardon the interruption. I would come down on the side of Dreamtrove on this Chavez debate. He treats the Venezuelan media, poor, and opposition like dogs. There is also a Clinton - Bush complex in American politics. This will be proved when we go into our 32 year of one of them running the white house.

While reading some of the past threads, before jumping in, I realized there is a group of you who will take any side(no matter how repulsive) other than America's. Whats up with that? I will go read more past threads to try and catch up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:28 PM

PHOENIXSHIP


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
They sit in some conference room (or in the Green Zone) and get the latest poop from the Press Scy/ General/ Head Dog Catcher.



Hey, don't lump us good folk in Animal Control in with those losers!!!

"Why're you arguin' what's already been decided?"
Mal to Jayne, "Jaynestown"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:14 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Dreamtrove- I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts that the elite in Bolivia will not let Morales reach his goals no matter how reasonable and modest they might be. Because the wealthy ARE wealthy through corruption- they have absolutely no intention of improving business, or raising the standard of living. They have only one pursuit- to maintain their unfair and un-earned stranglehold on land and money. For God's sake, the LAST thing they want is competition!

And then one of two things will happen: Morales will be seen as a failure by his current supporters, who will dump him in favor of someone more radical... or Morales himself will become more radical as the intransigience of the wealthy becomes truly obstructive. And then all hell will break loose.

Your model for progress doesn't work for countries like Bolivia and Venezuela because they have virtually no middle class. The dynamic is entirely different there than here. IF Morales could create a large enough middle class fast enough then they would try to glue the situaiton together. But I'm of the impression that the wealthy in that country are so damn greedy and arrogant that they'll resist reform until the pitchforks, flambeaus and AK-47s are outside their villas. I think this will take 4-5 years to unfold, but I'm pretty certain it's heading in that direction.

Chavez is very much in the mold of Castro or Napolean or Kaddafi: a single ruler whose government and reforms may not survive the person. I think they see themselves as "benefactors" and "creators of a new society" and the genesis of everything good. They don't realize that they need to get the buy-in of their population, and to set into motion self-sustaining processes. But Chavez is actually doing more good for his nation that his predecessors ever did, and he is having a beneficial impact on the society in terms of actual standard of living. I get that you don't like his methods, but don't blind yourself to the results either, or you'll be just another ideologue with an axe to grind .

As far as seeing the evil within: As far as I'm concerned, 95%+ of politicans are so thoroughly co-opted by wealth that they may as well be chucked into the ocean w/ concrete shoes. Clinton's love affair with NAFTA and China soured me on his basic approach. But Clinton did a couple of positive things: he raised the minimum wage and reduced the Federal deficit.

Look, I know you're into saying that they're all the same- like all governments are the same- but although Clinton and Bush are both playing to wealth, there ARE differences among the wealthy. Once again, I think your ideology is blinding you to the fact that even the wealthy have some pretty strong schisms running between them, and that you're missing critical distinctions between those corporations that feast on war and those that get fat in peacetime.
---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:28 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

They sit in some conference room (or in the Green Zone) and get the latest poop from the Press Scy/ General/ Head Dog Catcher... SignyM

Hey, don't lump us good folk in Animal Control in with those losers!!!

Beg pardon!! Comparing you to Bush is an insult to dog catchers everyhwere!


---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:07 PM

CITIZEN


Dream

Whatever.

You accuse me of being 'Auraptor' yet I always attempt to back up what I say. You never do, I suspect the irony of all the accusations you level at me being more true of you is lost on you.

You're a rightwind Troll. Nothing you say has any wieght until that changes.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:08 PM

DREAMTROVE


In a previous thread, a venezuelan did it a lot better than I, but in general, you can go around the web and read about Chavez and his govt.'s red friends, and how they get free oil, and how chavez is poiling up on weapons, and how he has a mainstreaming program to assimilate indians, similar to what we once had in this country.
I don't think he's the anti-christ, as I said, but I do think that he's a typical socialist dictator.

Chavez's democratic elections are in plenty of doubt, ours are down right fraudulent.

Chavez's "oil for expertise" program does not even come close to a fair economic exchange for Venezuela. This analysis has been done many times. Since he is president of Venezuela, and makes deals which clearly benefit China and Cuba at the expense of Venezuela, I'd say that makes him most certainly a pawn. I think that one could easily say in the same sense that Bush is a pawn of Saudi Arabia and Israel, and I wouldn't disagree. Whoever Chavez's own personal allies overseas are is immaterial. His first responsibility is to the people of Venezuela.

In addition, Venezuela has had one on the world's highest rates of deforestation under Chavez. The fact that he now has a re-forestation problem doesn't help. The problem isn't just the # of trees, it's the first growth forest which is being destroyed, and destroying the species of life on earth.

So:

1. He is destroying indigenous cultures, and moving indian populations.
2. He is destroying rainforest and species.
3. He is stock piling weapons in the stated interest of spreading socialism
4. He is giving away Venezualan natural resources to his own personal friends.
5. He has silenced opposition, free of speech.
6. He has solidified his own personal power.

All of this was on an earlier thread, and I went digging. I suck at links, sorry. I'm sure it's out there. If I were a venezuelan, I'd vote for someone else. His best thing so far was that he offered to sell heating oil to the american poor at a discount. He likes to be liked, but it was a good thing to do, I'm a fan of soft power. I don't think he represents the interests of the people of Venezeula. I do think Evo Morales represents the interests of the people of Bolivia.

The point of my post is that really, Chavez has no diplomatic skill.

Quote:

What do you mean by control of their own country? You mean like we have? Cuz we're all so bloody rich in america, sporting the highest poverty rate among rich nations.


When did I say that Bush/Clinton was good govt?
I think good leaders are hard to find these days. I think Roh Moo-hyun does a decent job, as does Vincente Fox, I think even Ahmadinejad is a decent leader, who deeply cares about his people and their welfare. I think Manmohan Singh is a good leader. I said I think Evo Morales has promise.

But some world leaders are less than above board, and others are real thugs. The world's worst leader is undoubtedly, and I think he has a ten point lead: Robert Mugabe. I think he got a head start. I think that if someone suggested getting rid of him in the UN you would see a single dissenter other than himseld, Mr. Thabo Mbeki, who is also way down there. Mbeki, who denied for years that AIDS exists, still maintains a ban on medical treatment of AIDS patients. Also low on my list is Mr. Vladimir Putin, who wants to throw his country back into the dark ages, and jailed his own political opposition, and stole his own people's wealth and oil, and is stealing the Chechen's, and now the Kurd's. Jacques Chirac is pretty appalling, the fact that man would be in jail if he weren't president is not a rumor, he's already been convicted twice of embezzlement, and uses presidential immunity to avoid imprisonment, not to mention, he nuked Tahiti twice, and is personally responsible for the extinction of more species of life than any other living being. Kim Jong Il is a terrible leader, but he doesn't even compare to the ones in the above list. He's probably actually trying to do what he thinks is best for his country, he's just wrong. Hu Jintao is pretty bad, but he has a tough job. Tony Blair is terrible, most of the neocons in europe and here aren't much better, and Bush is a real loser. none of this last group are really as bad as Kim Jong Il. So it's a scale. We've got bad, worse, worst. Chavez is probably somewhere around Bush, maybe not-as-bad-as, or maybe worse-than, depends on whether you look at it from a civil rights or environmental perspective (chavez worse) or a total body count perspective (bush worse).

But bad is bad. I'm not grading on a curve.

None of these guys are even halfway decent, like say a maggie thatcher or a ronnie reagan, or for you on the left, a jimmy carter or a gerhard schroeder.

Just about no one around today is getting the label of "Good" or "Great" like Eisenhower, Coolidge or TR. (I'm sure folks on the left have your historical faves, also not to be found here today)

Maybe those few I mentioned at the beginning classify as "good."

Venezuela can do a lot better. The danger is that Chavez and his red clad yesmen won't let them. If you don't believe me, ask them.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:14 PM

DREAMTROVE


Re: Clinton and Bush, it is not that they are "all the same" it's that this is the same group, same small cabal... closer to each other than they are to members of their own party. It's like Running Aniken Skywalker against Senator Palpatine in an election.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:49 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Venezuela can do a lot better.
We can ALL do "a lot better". The question is- "Is Chavez doing better for Venezuela than his immediate predecessors?"

I know that you want things to resemble your ideal: small competitive businesses, robust middle class, small government, as much as possible at the local level. Transparency. But the fact is that large businesses are sitting like squat toads on everything including government. And that people "like" Cheney are in charge everywhere and will not be dislodged w/o considerable strife. And it may not be in ways that you like.

As far as the Clinton/ Bush twinship: Your list of "good leaders" versus "bad leaders" makes me think that you don't quite have all the facts. MANY of the current appointees (like "Death Squad" Negroponte and "arms dealer" Abrams) were part of the Reagan administration. Reagan, as you might recall, was either deeply involved in Iran-Contra or deeply unaware of the doings of his own appointees and their subordinates. There is far more continuity between Bush and Reagan than between Bush and Clinton. Which makes me think that your conclusions are suspect at best.

Perosnally, I think Halliburton was not on Clinton's radar. He should get tarred with NAFTA, but I think some things were done despite Clinton not because of him.


---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 21, 2006 10:33 PM

RIGHTEOUS9



I am no expert on chavez, so I'll take your arguments at face value. I'm not sure you can grade Venezuela on the same scale you would say, the U.S. though. Assuming he is deforresting, asuming he's making sweet-heart deals for his 'commie' friends...can you really judge these choices in a vacuum that doesn't include a need to side with somebody while not towing the Pro-America Pillage-all-for-the-corporations global policies?

It's amazing he's lasted so long as it is - you don't think he needs allies of a different ilk? You don't think he's rational for thinking he needs an army?

Like I said - not a Chavez or political science expert, but could those bad policies you argue he has enacted still be the best possible, given his limited options? Couldn't he actually be acting in the best interst of his people within that range of options? Not trying to prop him up...just trying to understand this stuff better.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 3:50 AM

DREAMTROVE


Quote:

The question is- "Is Chavez doing better for Venezuela than his immediate predecessors?"


No, it's not.

Venezuela is doing better because it just found a motherlode of oil (directly prior to Chavez) and so of course things will improve. But... and there's a lot of but here, is it doing better with Chavez than it would be with a political rival?

The question of G.W.Bush is not whether he's better or worse than Clinton. (Probably Neither) It's whether he's got the American People's interests at heart (He doesn't.)

I didn't claim Reagan was perfect, but neither was Carter. I'm surprised you didn't attack Eisenhower for nuclear testing, which is what I would have done, and almost did. But I was making a comparison. Reagan, and a lot of good people in his govt., had the interests of America in mind, and things were pretty good in the 80s. New businesses got started, scientific advances were not outlawed, no one tried to silence freedom of speech, no one was getting nuked, we were at war with no one. Were bad people in the background trying to cause trouble? Sure. Were their bad people in the Carter Administration trying to cause trouble? Sure. Paul Wolfowitz wanted to use Carter to start World War III in the Middle East. Did it happen? No. In part because Carter lost the eleciton, but in part because Carter himself was basically a decent guy, and had a lot of less evil people working for him. If anything, I thought if you wanted to be non-partisan you could have attacked Carter for FISA, which was an abandonment of the Bill of Rights.

BTW, I have plenty of facts on Reagan. But where's the tactile proof of America being sold down the river, or world war three, or anything like what we've seen with Bush and Clinton. Nobody's perfect. The question is, did evil reign supreme? No, it didn't. Evil hid in the shadows and tried to get its way, and for the most part, failed.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 4:02 AM

DREAMTROVE


I get your point, it's side with someone big day, but I think that Brazil is probably plenty big enough. The US can't really invade Venezuela in its current state of losing two wars at once already.

Europe would be another good ally to have. Morales is trying to tie in an alliance with Europe. I think that's a better move. I think there's a fair amount of people out there who just fear america, and so they're siding with the other side.

For environmental disasters, has anyone checked out the Three Gorges Project?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 6:11 AM

CHRISISALL


Interesting article here:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15049.htm

Bush Rages: “I am not Beelzebub, Lord of Sulfur”

By Mike Whitney

“The devil is right at home…. The devil himself is right in the house. And the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came right here…And it still smells of sulfur today.” Hugo Chavez; address to the UN General Assembly 9-20-06

My oh my, has Hugo Chavez caused a furor. Looking at the news reports filed in the last 24 hours, one would think that he snuck a dirty-bomb into the United Nations rather than gave a speech. In fact, the plucky Chavez may have delivered the finest 30 minute presentation that august assembly has ever heard. In that short span of time he publicly throttled the Global Emperor in front of 6 billion people and left his bruised and bloodied carcass splattered across the canvas like Roberto Duran in Round 9 of the middleweight championship match…..

“No mas, no mas no mas”…

And what about the performance? Is Chavez part of a theatre troupe or is he just earning his chops as a method actor?

Whatever it is; it seems to be working. After skewering Bush as “the devil” and sniffing around for sulfur (the traditional sign of Lucifer) Chavez performed his ablutions with a sign of the cross and an angelic expression worthy of Botticelli.

If you’re a lefty, it just doesn’t get any better than this.

Chavez should give lessons in public speaking. His appearance was like a clap of thunder; waving Chomsky with one hand and pummeling Bush with the other. He managed to heap more muck on “Guantanamo Nation” than anyone since Harold Pinter gave his blistering Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech on 12-7-05. That’s when Pinter said:

“The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have ever talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised quite a clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It is a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.”

Chavez matched Pinter word for word, exposing the hypocrisy, lies and brutality of an administration that never stops lecturing about freedom and liberation even though it grinds out mountains of carnage everywhere it goes.

And where was Bush when Chavez delivered his broadside ….hiding behind Karen Hughes skirts, picking out a new eye-liner for his next televised harangue against Muslims, retrieving his Yale pom-poms from the dry-cleaners?

Our benighted leader always seems to disappear whenever the prospect of danger arises. He skedaddled when his number came up for the Alabama National Guard and he lit-out for the safety of a Nebraska cornfield when the planes hit the towers. He even vamoosed at a trade summit in Argentina when Chavez threatened “to sneak up behind him and give him a bear-hug.” That really put a spring in old Bush’s step as he quickly scuttled to the safety of Airforce One.

One thing is certain, whenever there’s peril, President “gone-to-soon” will be speeding off in a trail of vapor.

In any case, Bush was not missed at the UN massacre yesterday. Chavez held-forth like a preacher at a brothel; scattering the bodies and kicking open the windows to let the sunlight in. He delivered one, ferocious roundhouse punch after another….

Boom, boom, boom…until the crowd rose in a thunderous 5 minute ovation. (which was carefully omitted from the TV coverage)

“What would the people of the world tell (Bush) if they were given the floor?” Chavez asked. “What would they have to say? I have some inkling of what they would say, what the oppressed people think. They would say, ‘Yankee imperialist, go home.”

“He spoke to the people of Lebanon,” Chavez added. “Many of you have seen, he said, how your homes and communities were caught in the crossfire. How cynical can you get? What a capacity to lie shamefacedly. The bombs in Beirut were delivered with laser precision….This is imperialist (and) genocidal; the empire and Israel firing on the people of Palestine and Lebanon. That is what happened. And now we hear, ‘We’re suffering because we see homes destroyed.’”

Ouch; no wonder Bush “high-tailed it” out of the UN before the ensuing bloodbath.

Chavez is like a battering ram punching holes in the wall of silence which surrounds King George. Right after his speech I checked in at CNN and, as I expected, Bush-apologist Wolf Blitzer was spinning in his wingtips frantically trying to stitch together the tattered image of the Dear Leader. A quick peek at Google News confirms that the entire arsenal of corporate media is now engaged in the hopeless task of salvaging Bush’s wretched presidency.

But the damage is done. Chavez played the match on Bush’s home turf and beat him like a drum. Bush is probably still quivering under his desk.

“There are other ways of thinking,” Chavez opined. “There are young people who think differently and this has happened in a mere decade. It has been shown that ‘the end of history’ was a false assumption, and the same is true of Pax Americana and the establishment of a ‘capitalist neo-liberal world. The system has only generated more poverty. Who believes in it now?”

Yes, who believes it now? Who believes in a party which has only produced two ideas in its entire history; tax cuts and war? Who believes that endless bombardment and martial law can be passed off as democracy and liberation? Who believes that a rogue’s gallery of liars, war-profiteers and gangsters can work in the public’s interest?

“We want ideas to save our planet from the imperialist threat. And, hopefully in this very century, in not to long a time, we will see a new era, and for our children and grandchildren, a world of peace based on the fundamental principles of the United Nations, but a renewed United Nations.”

Yes, Hugo, we want peace with our neighbors, peace with our friends, and peace with our enemies. We’re sick of war and the men who want war; and that includes every feckless politico in Congress, Democrat and Republican alike.

“The hegemonistic pretensions of the American empire are placing at risk the very existence of the human species. We appeal to the people of the United States and of the world to halt this threat which is like a sword hanging over our heads.”

There’s no time to lose. We have to dump Bush NOW and get on with the pressing issues of global warming, peak oil, nuclear proliferation, poverty and AIDS.

Chavez is right; the present model for global rule is broken and corrupt. We need a change.

“Capitalism is savagery,” Chavez boomed.

Viva Chavez.

Sulfur-smelling Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 6:41 AM

FELLOWTRAVELER


BTW, did everyone see that Chomsky's "Hedgemony or Survival" has soared at Amazon since Chavez's speech? It's currently #1 (12:37 PM ET). Anything that gets more people reading more Chomsky has to be a good thing...

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/new-for-you/top-sellers/-/books/a
ll/ref=pd_dp_ts_b_1/104-9855878-9289546

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 9:17 AM

DREAMTROVE


Bush Claims Not to be Beelzebub, Nation Waits for Proof.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 12:32 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


RE: Propaganda

One thing carefully omitted from US coverage was the APPLAUSE and LAUGHTER that Chavez elicited. Without that feedback, people are shocked... shocked, I tell you!... when someone flies a plane into one of our buildings "How could they do that to us?" people wonder "we're such nice people!". And then they turn into butt-puckered paranoids like Auraptor.


SEESH!!!

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 2:21 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

The question is, did evil reign supreme? No, it didn't. Evil hid in the shadows and tried to get its way, and for the most part, failed.
Try as hard as I might to understand your POV ... I just don't get it.

To recap the Reagan years:

Lebanon- Reagan intervenes in civil war on behalf of Xtian President Gameyal. Seven months later, 260 Marines are dead, 241 in an attack on barracks in Beirut. To take the sting away from an ignominious massacre Reagan then invaded...

Grenada, the smallest independent nation in the Western hemisphere.

Star Wars. The biggest beneficiary was the military-industrial complex

Deficit spending- Reagan promised to cut taxes, boost the military and balance the budget through the use of the appropriately-named Laffer curve. Instead, he racked up a bigger deficit than all previous Presidents combined.

Most serious: Iran- Contra. Selling arms to Iran for hostages (we're talking thousands of TOW missiles, SAMs, etc.) and funneling the money for covert ops in Central America that had been specifically defunded by Congress.

As far as his appointees, there was (see below). These guys are (or were) appointed to the current Bush Administration

Rumsfeld: Special Envoy to the Middle East (indeed)

Armitage: "point man" in Vietnam, "likes to kill", graduated to gun smuggling and drug-running to support covert ops in Afghanistan and Central America. This is the man who just recently told Musharref he would be bombed back into the stone age and who "accidentally" leaked Plame's name to the press. (sure)

Colin Powell: Bypassed normal procurement procedures to get those TOW missiles and other weapons ready for Iran.

Elliot Abrams: Deeply involved in Iran-Contra.

Negroponte: Boosted American military aid to Honduras from $4 to $77 million to fund "death squads".

Poindexter: Also deeply involved in Iran Contra.

------------------------------

Which get me back to the whole "Bush and Clinton are twins" thing. I just don't see adminstrative overlap between the two. I can't fathom WHY Clinton would throw $$ to Halliburton except that it was off his radar. Did he own stock? (no) Was he trying to gain cooperation from someone? (no) He's a NAFTA guy- an "internationalist". He bought into all kinds of international agreements.

Then you look at Bush's record crafting and advancing trade (or for that matter.. ANY) international agreement. It's dismal. Every international trade negotiation has foundered on farm subsidies. Kyoto- dead. Prohibiting the use of land mines- dead. Geneva Convention- needs "clairification". Aid to Africa- a joke.

So, put your argument on wheels and run that by me again because "It just don't make sense".

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 2:46 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Fav Chavez quote, besides calling Bush "El Diablo":

Quote:


VIDEO DOWNLOAD:

"And we must recall in this room that in just a few days there will be another anniversary. Thirty years will have passed from this other horrendous terrorist attack on the Cuban plane, where 73 innocents died, a Cubana de Aviacion airliner. And where is the biggest terrorist of this continent who took the responsibility for blowing up the plane? He spent a few years in jail in Venezuela. Thanks to CIA and then government officials, he was allowed to escape, and he lives here in this country, protected by the government. And he was convicted. He has confessed to his crime. But the U.S. government has double standards. It protects terrorism when it wants to. I accuse the American government of protecting terrorists and of having a completely cynical discourse. And I would just add one thing: Those who perpetrated this crime are free. And that other event where an American citizen also died were American themselves. They were CIA killers, terrorists."
-President Hugo Chavez, United Nations Corporation, Fox News, September 2006
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=634200
12&blogID=170652626


VIDEO DOWNLOAD: ABC Nightline - "The deadliest airline bombing in the Western Hemisphere" - A short film about the downing of Cubana Airlines Flight 455 and the death of all 73 on board, and the necessity to extradite the organizer of that terrorist act, Luis Posada Carriles, from the Unites States to Venezuela to stand trial for his crimes. Genocidal serial killer and convicted mass-murdering warcriminal, Communist KGB employee, homosexual rapist of US soldiers, and George Bush Jr's pick to run his 9/11 Commission coverup, Sir Heinz "Henry" Kissenger Knight of the BRITSH Empire claims he is not guilty of this particular mass murder. ABC News proves Kissenger is a pathological liar
http://infowars.net/articles/September2006/220906Carriles.htm



The Bush Crime Family's pardons and criminal federal judges continue to coddle these confessed terrorist bombers in USA today, to protect their boss Sir George Bush Sr Knight of the BRITISH Empire, who was CIA director when Cubana de Aviacion Flight 455 was bombed by CIA employees.
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=634200
12&blogID=170652626


Quote:



AND HIS WAS AN EVIL LAUGH

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, heh heh heh, just so long as I'm the dictator, heh heh heh."
-George Bush Jr, convicted drunk driver and AWOL draft deserter, arrested for theft and cocaine, sued for rape and sued for perping the 9/11 terrorist massacres, who performs mock human sacrifice to worship Satan at Bohemian Grove, who ate off Adolf Hitler's Nazi silverware at Yale Skull & Bones, whose grandfather Prescott Bush was arrested and handcuffed 3 times and paid a $750,000 forfeiture under the Trading With The Enemy Act for arming Nazi Germany DURING World War 2 (but Roosevelt's Trading With The Enemy Act actually LICENSED trading with the enemy, so Prescott didn't get the death penalty and was promoted to US Senate)
VIDEO DOWNLOAD:
www.vestigialconscience.com/bush-dictator.mpeg



Here's video of Satanist George Bush Jr worshipping THE DEVIL:

Quote:



Bush Gang and Bill Clinton-Blythe Rockefeller worshipping Molech/Lucifer/Satan at Bohemian Grove in Monte Rio, California on Summer Solstice. Photo copyright Bohemian Club annual yearbook
http://www.lonelantern.org/bohemian_grove.html

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Dark Secrets Inside Bohemian Grove
Original full-length version - Infiltration of Jewish Bohemian Grove presidential compound and homosexual nudist colony that performs "mock" human sacrifice to 50-foot-tall idol of Molech - Where Bush Gang and Bill Clinton-Blythe III (Rockefeller) vacation every year to worship Satan and run nekked in the woods with 3,000 homosexual world dictators - Undercover video by Infowars.com
http://www.archive.org/details/DSIBG
http://www.infowars.com/bg1.html

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Dark Secrets Inside Bohemian Grove and The Order of Death
Two documentaries in one - An employee of Bohemian Grove presidential compound used undercover video to capture the 50-foot-tall idol of Molech and "mock" human sacrifice up close and in broad daylight - Undercover video by Infowars.com
http://www.lastingnetworks.com/alex/

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Boners at Bohemian Grove
Music video by Counter Coup and John Lee
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2005/09/6737.php

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Snuff kiddie porn at Bohemian Grove
Alex Jones of Infowars.com interviews Senator John DeCamp author of The Franklin Coverup, music by Counter Coup and Bohemian Club
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2005/09/6737.php

Moloch.
an ancient Phoenician and Ammonite god, to whom children were sacrificed by burning.
-Webster's New World Dictionary

"And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones. And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name. And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not: Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people."
-Leviticus 20:1-5, Christian Bible KJV

"And Solomon did evil in the sight of the LORD, and went not fully after the LORD, as did David his father. Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon."
-1 Kings 11:6-7, Christian Bible KJV

"Because of all the evil of the children of Israel and of the children of Judah, which they have done to provoke me to anger, they, their kings, their princes, their priests, and their prophets, and the men of Judah, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem. And they have turned unto me the back, and not the face: though I taught them, rising up early and teaching them, yet they have not hearkened to receive instruction. But they set their abominations in the house, which is called by my name, to defile it. And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin."
-Jeremiah 32:32-35, Christian Bible KJV

"And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD. Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
-Leviticus 18:21-22, Christian Bible KJV

And the king sent, and they gathered unto him all the elders of Judah and of Jerusalem. And the king commanded Hilkiah the high priest, and the priests of the second order, and the keepers of the door, to bring forth out of the temple of the LORD all the vessels that were made for Baal, and for the grove, and for all the host of heaven: and he burned them without Jerusalem in the fields of Kidron, and carried the ashes of them unto Bethel. And he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the grove. And he defiled Topheth, which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom, that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech. And he slew all the priests of the high places that were there upon the altars, and burned men's bones upon them, and returned to Jerusalem. Jehoahaz was twenty and three years old when he began to reign; and he reigned three months in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Hamutal, the daughter of Jeremiah of Libnah. And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD. And Jehoiakim gave the silver and the gold to Pharaoh; but he taxed the land to give the money according to the commandment of Pharaoh: he exacted the silver and the gold of the people of the land, of every one according to his taxation, to give it unto Pharaohnechoh. Jehoiakim was twenty and five years old when he began to reign; And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his fathers had done."
-2 Kings 23:1-37

"But it's not just the ratty part of town. The upper class in San Francisco is that way. The Bohemian Grove, which I attend from time to time - it is the most faggy goddamn thing that you would ever imagine with that San Francisco crowd."
-President Richard "Dick" Nixon, White House audiotape, Nixon Presidential Library, 1971
http://www.prisonplanet.com/032604nixontape.html (audio download)

More photos and news from Bohemian Grove:
http://www.nwowatcher.com/smf/index.php?topic=152
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Grove


Bush Gang and Bill Clinton-Blythe Rockefeller performing "mock" human sacrifice to 50-foot tall idol of Molech/Lucifer/Satan at Bohemian Grove. Photo copyright Bohemian Club annual yearbook
http://www.43places.com/places/view/379646


So Chavez is incorrect about Junior Bush "being the Devil". Technically, Bush only worships the Devil, aka El Diablo's Little Helper, and is just another draft-dodging chickenhawk in Satan's Army. Which begs the question, if Satan hires draftdodgers, how can Satan win a war?


FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 3:14 PM

DREAMTROVE


Signym

Dig more.

NAFTA is a neocon plot, it's a globalist idea, it's the opposition to internationalist. Clinton is a globalist, not an internationalist. Internationalism believes in different nations, and things like the UN. Actually, the change over to Bush resulted in fewer personel changes than any other bipartisan change over in history (<50%)

The restructuring of the military towards Halliburton was Clinton's own personal initiative, not off of his radar at all. Besides, read enough about Clinton and you get how he was a texas drug thug just like Bush.

The worst thing in the 80s for America was our support of Saddam in the Iran-Iraq war.

Wasn't saying reagan was perfect.


BTW, this just in. I wasn't disagreeing with Chavez. Just pointing out that it wasn't very diplomatic. So what is Nancy Pelosi on about? She's the opposition. She *should* be calling Bush a donkey. Except that it's the dem's mascot. But she could call him a monkey.


Clinton's main international deals were selling our ports to a british company. The Dubai deal was more of a Clinton gaff than a Bush one, but you won't rook me into defending Bush. But we had little control over the deal once the ports were sold. Also, the selling of long beach naval base to China? pure Clinton. Did you know that this is the base which is now used by the commies to funnel arms to Chavez?

Also, this Chavez arms thing is a mess. It's entirely possible that he will use his new stockpile to arm revolutions in neighboring counties.


Your position "the left has no part in this mess" doesn't match up with the facts, or even come to the same library as the truth. I think the academic left, in particular the commie circles of academia, are the main architects of this disaster. Sure, there's tons of corruption, and a number of immensely stupid christians and conservatives who bought it hook line and sinker, and many many who still do. But you guys on the regular non-commie left are still buying it hook line and sinker after you're own disaster-in-chief, Mr. Clinton killed a million plus people, stole a trillion plus dollars, and sold off your countries national security and forwarded mergers that put an end to competition and the free press. The real threat to free press is not the govt.'s little annoying interference, it's the total lack of competition resulting from merger mania. It's that Time/Warner, Disney, Viacom and FOX control everything you see and hear. Time/Warner and CBS/Viacom are barely even separate entities from each other.

Not that Bush is the opposite of this policy, he's the continuation of it. Are there differences? Sure, they compete with one another for control, to some extent. But personally, the Bushes and Clintons still get along swimmingly.

As I said, I'm sure I can prove this point, and will build a website full of links and send you the address at some point before Hillary is president.

We all voted for at least one loser of this set. We need to get over our denial so that we can learn from our mistakes and not do it again.

BTW, a typical move of the Bush/Clinton team is that the key players on one side are in the govt. when that side is in power, and then they join the private sector while the other side is in power. But all this time, the team is always making deals with itself. And this club is small. It's much smaller than the political players as a whole.

I think the biggest connection i have seen is that if you look at something and say "bush did this evil thing" you can usually dig and see "oh, and so did clinton" but you don't find that jfk or nixon did it. Sometimes you find small under the table reagan and carter deals, but you have to realize that these evil people were in those administrations, doesn't mean that they were running them. Remember, the main architects of the Iraq war were Wolfowitz and Perle, people from the Carter administration, and they follow something called the "Carter Doctrine"

Does this mean that Carter was evil and wanted world war three? No, it means these same crooks were playing the same game then.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_Doctrine

Clinton/Bush came into office and there was an attack on the WTC. fraudulent evidence was presented to implicate an arab.

Clinton/Bush engaged in illegal wiretapping, their own party made a catch up law to attempt to legalize the blatant break of the law with no real lead from the whitehouse.

Clinton/Bush made a special sweetheart deal with Halliburton to take over the job of a major support role of the military.

Clinton/Bush waged a bloody campaign against Iraq that could be deemed genocidal, killed countless civilians and included bombing runs on residential neighborhoods.

Clinton/Bush was at war steadily throughout their presidency.

Clinton/Bush attempted to enact a largescale national health spending operation which would give a blank check to pharmaceutical companies which had helped put them in office.

Clinton/Bush fought an additional war for the express purpose of building a Halliburton pipeline.

Clinton/Bush armed rebels to create a central african conflict which degenerated into a pogram of genocidal extermination.

Clinton/Bush used torture as a means of interrogation, and exported people to our muslim dictatorship friends for tortures we couldn't apply. http://ace.mu.nu/archives/028765.php

Clinton/Bush engaged in carpet bombing of of civilian neighborhoods with depleted uranium.

Clinton/Bush openly supported outsourcing and allowed companies to save on taxes at the same time.

Clinton/Bush manipulated elections and primaries to get themselves into office in a way which was altogether questionable.

Clinton/Bush believed in expanding US military actions in the world while scaling back on the number of actual troops.

Clinton/Bush believed in scaling back aid programs to citizens such as unemployment compensation.

Clinton/Bush supported Walmart, big oil and big pharm, and were supported by them.

Clinton/Bush got their boost into power through connections they made in their life a drug dealer.

Clinton/Bush do not have many of these things in common with anyone else who came before them, or many of those who run against them.

Bush is Clinton just from the policy appearance. Digging into Clinton's past shows the same profile as Bush's. They both have a weird Waco connection.

Notice that Clinton didn't support the Gore campaign? He didn't want Gore to win, he wanted Bush to win. Bush won't support republican resistance to Hillary Clinton, he wants her to win.

I think add it all together, it just spells "Duh."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 6:24 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


DT

Kielbasa, bratwurst, hot dogs - in other words -

LINKS !!! man, LINKS !!

You made many claims about Chavez and Venezuela, presumably information gathered in your post-internet life. NONE of them square with anything I've read. On the one hand - information I've read first hand. On the other hand - your unsupported claims. What do YOU think carries more weight? Until you provide some sources, I can't credit what you say.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 22, 2006 6:38 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


SignyM,

Clinton did some things that deeply disappointed me. Many of them I understood as political expediency - but some just seemed intentionally, pointedly wrong-headed. Like NAFT for example. On its face it seemed so self-destructive. And given Clinton's general acumen, I puzzled over it at length. How could someone so smart do something so dumb? The best I could figure was that he was trying to float the US standard of living on cheap imports. If you're ALL sinking to the bottom of the barrel, it's best to be floating on top. So I reserved judgment on that, thinking there might be a factor I didn't account for.

I have to admit I haven't kept track. How did it all turn out?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:08 AM

DREAMTROVE


Rue,


On Clinton

Your defense strikes me as rhetorical. Like the democratic party's response to the infamous black republican's ad. The bottom line is what Chris Matthews said: Sure, but what part of that isn't true?

Clinton links would take a lot of work, because clinton years were early years of the net, when everything was business and there was not a lot of political networking.

I provide a link to the only one of those that I thought would be in doubt to people. I thought all of the rest of it was well established fact.

I am going to have about $1000 more in bills than I have in income this month, and no idea how to cover it, so I'm greatly lacking for free time. What is on that list that you doubt?

I'll try to dig something up if there's something specifically there that you have reason to think isn't so.

On Chavez

Most of my Chavez stuff came from the venezuelan who posted earlier, but I did search on it and see that it was so, I can look. I believe I started that earlier round with Chavez is not as bad as we think, but I got my ass kicked in the argument. I'm always suspicious of any argument in which the official position side is that of big oil, but that aside, I still came to that conclusion, Chavez, not the antichrist, but suboptimal.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:09 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Clinton did a lot of stupid things:

Established normal trade relations with China
Fought- hard- for NAFTA
Fought- hard- for GATT
Scraped people off permanent welfare w/o the job training necessary to boost them into the workforce.

As far as NAFTA is concerned, it did exactly what it's detractors said it would do: It relocated USA jobs to Mexico. www.citizen.org/trade/nafta/

Clinton's real weakness seemed to be that he believed that "free trade" really would promote democracy. It seems to me that he thought that free trade would work IF it was adopted in a framework of international law.

One of the big differences between Clinton and Bush- and I think it is a signal difference- is that Clinton was in love with international agreements. He signed a lot:

Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption September 18, 2000.

Inter-American Convention Against Corruption July 27, 2000.

Rome Statute for an International
Criminal Court (ICC) December 31, 2000
www.abanet.org/poladv/priorities/intltreaties.html

Comprehensive [Nuclear] Test Ban Treaty 1996

UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1994 Agreement relating to Implementation of Part IX (Deep Seabed Mining)
www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Rogue_State_US/Biggest_Rogue.html

Chemical Weapons Convention signed 1993
www.infoplease.com/ce6/people/A0812580.html

By contrast, Bush uses the military almost exclusively in international matters. CAFTA, WTO, UN, G8, Kyoto... he or his appointees attend but in general they are obstructive to the USA entering into ANY international agreements.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:34 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


DT- I agree with Rue. I need links. I'm not ging to spend the next five hours digging thru nut-job websites to find credible evidence to support YOUR posts. Clinton a drug thug like Bush? Clinton pushing for Halliburton? C'mon. Show me some evidence.
Quote:

Your position "the left has no part in this mess" doesn't match up with the facts, or even come to the same library as the truth. I think the academic left, in particular the commie circles of academia, are the main architects of this disaster.
What, in your opinion, is the MAIN fault of the "commie left"? Supporting "merger mania"? Pushing for NAFTA? Operating our ports and security and military on a business basis? Pushing for trade with China? Cutting back on welfare? I dunno DT.... doesn't sound like "the left" to me at all. So, really, what mythical group are you refering to, and what their main failure?
Quote:

We all voted for at least one loser of this set.
Did not. You keep thinking that I supported Clinton. I have said time, and time, and time again- I didn't vote for him. I didn't support him. I didn't vote for Bush either- I "threw my vote away" on a third party candidate who had not a prayer of winning. Rue is right- you have idee fixes that keep you from absorbing crucial facts, which is why you keep misrepresenting me in your own mind and misunderstanding what I'm saying.

One of the reason why we keep going round and round is that you keep calling groups by names that have no historical relevance or any connection to their current positions. So anyone you disagree with is a "commie" or a "democrat" or a "socialist" or a "fascist" or a "Schachtmannite" because they ALL believe in big-government (in your view). I think this blur critical distinctions that would otherwise inform your thinking. If you would stop re-naming the world to meet your expectations our discussions would be a lot more productive.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 23, 2006 7:27 AM

FREMDFIRMA


You know, that's why I left off trying to discuss anything with DT.

If you can't even hold to mutual definition of even a single term, how the hell can you have a reasoned discussion with someone when they keep changing the meaning of the words they use to describe something ?

Honestly, DT, I know you mean well, but I am really startin to wonder if you live on the same planet as the rest of us, cause unless you start linking some of this stuff you're shovelling, we're going to take it as it's face value.

Zero.

Even PN does enough homework to support his statements with links, some of them to quite reputable sources at times, so if the issue at hand matters enough for you to discuss it at such length, it damn well should matter enough for you to provide one whit of supporting evidence, especially when you are making claims that fly in the face of common sense, established, confirmed evidence and historical precedent.

If you intend to be taken any kind of seriously, when you make a claim of that nature you better be prepared to back it up, and have all your ducks in a row, else you're just another cuckoo bird ain't no one gonna listen to.

Not that I care very much, mind you, like I said, my free advice is worth everythin ya paid for it... still, you want credibility, you better bring enough evidence to the table to buy it.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 23, 2006 9:03 AM

DREAMTROVE


Okay,

You win. I concede. Clinton is the only true son of God. Worship on. Or you could go search for this stuff yourself. I don't have the time to argue this, I'm not the master webreasearcher that PN is.

If you want to know about Clinton's drug dealer network you need to look no further than his presidential pardon list. If you want to know about his big Halliburton deals, all you had to do was read the news, like, at all.

I give up. I leave you with this:

http://webcast.un.org/ramgen/ga/61/ga060919pm.rm

Go watch Ahmadinejad and Evo Morales and learn what real opposition is. The democrats are contantly bombarding people with liberal wedge issue politics which alienates the majority of Americans much the way Bush uses conservative wedge issues, and the rest of the time, to me, they are indistinguishable from Bush. If you want to get anyone anywhere closer to your side, find real leaders and support them, not just your own George W. Bushes.

Sig,

Bush's cronies are almost all former members of a group of trotsky leftests who were lead by Max Shachtman, (look him up in wikipedia)and Irving Kristol, people like that. They're commies, and they haven't changed since then. Look it up

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Shachtman

Look up Michael Harrington, Leo Strauss, Irving Kristol, these are the guys that Wolfowitz, Perle and co. worshipped, and still do, this is where the globalist agenda was born, where the war in Iraq was first cooked up. They tried to push Carter into it, and it might have worked if Carter hadn't lost the 1980 election, but now they Bush, and soon they'll have Hillary Clinton.

The problem with the political left isn't that it's radically left., it's that it's amazingly weak. It's like "Bush.left". Almost all I ever hear is "The only thing wrong is that we're not in charge."

As I said, any of you who were actually paying any attention in the 90s knows all of that stuff I posted already. I don't seriously credit that any of you actually doubt it any more than you actually doubt my unlinked claim that Joseph Stalin killed millions of his own people. I wasn't bringing it all up to convince you that Clinton was a bad guy, I thought we were on that page, I think I thought that all of the above was accepted fact.

I was posting it for two reasons:

1. The media has started to worship Clinton again in its build up lovefest to Hillary '08.

2. The democrats and the left have yet to convince me that they're not at least just like Bush. My point was, what am I missing? Where's the difference? Bush is way worse based on what? The coke vs. pepsi political contest has turned into the arsenic vs. cyanide political contest.

Finally, and I do mean this finally, I've mentioned several times that I barely have the free time to come here and post. If you really doubt that Clinton did any of those things, I'm sure you can google before you vote. But Pirate News does this stuff all day long, it's what he does. It's not what I do. I have barely the time to read all the rants here and write out my thoughts, a point I've made abundantly clear. So I can't help but feel that an inquisition insistance on me investing more time is a deliberate attempt to get rid of me in pursuit of liberal purity. I don't see any value in the debate you're creating, but you're welcome to it. I'm out of here. If anyone cares, you know how reach me, but in case you don't, you'll have better luck reaching me at dreamtrove - at - gmail.com

I have no time for this, which is why I balied before. I don't care who you vote for. But if you're going to be as unscutinizing as you appear to be of who you choose to support, I humbly suggest that Finn and Auraptor can probably set you up with some cushy jobs working for folks just as unscupulous as Clinton, but who pay way better.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 23, 2006 12:48 PM

CITIZEN


Since when have the Democrates been Left? America doesn't have a left wing party.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:18 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Okay, You win. I concede. Clinton is the only true son of God. Worship on.
Wow DT, perhaps you didn't read the part where I strongly disagreed with Clinton's policies on free trade and welfare? Or that I didn't vote for him? And you know what? I won't vote for Hillary either, if we should be so unfortunate to have her as a candidate. But some people- you perhaps- just can't take a qualified "yes" for an answer.

Just 'cause I don't unquestioningly lump Clinton in the same category as Bush doesn't mean you have to go off in a huff. But I will re-state my opinion one more time hoping that you will finally understand me. I think Cheney is evil. Very, very evil. Also, shortsighted and cruel. I think Clinton was evil- just as evil as Cheney. But in a qualitatively different way.

BTW, I did look up Schachtman. His thinking evolved considerably over the years, from a supporter of the Soviet Union to social democrat to seeing the USSR as worse than capitalism. And then when he died his so-called followers took that point even further into neoconservatism. And the guy wasn't even around at that point!

But all YOU see is Schachtman = neocon = democrat = socialist = fascist = GW Bush ... It's all just a big jumble for you, isn't it? In the meantime, the ONE thing you will not... EVER... admit is that big business is corrosive to people.

So, carry on.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, April 25, 2024 16:42 - 3563 posts
14 Tips To Reduce Tears and Remove Smells When Cutting Onions
Thu, April 25, 2024 16:39 - 3 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, April 25, 2024 16:18 - 6305 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, April 25, 2024 16:15 - 2306 posts
Scientific American Claims It Is "Misinformation" That There Are Just Two Sexes
Thu, April 25, 2024 15:33 - 14 posts
Sentencing Thread
Thu, April 25, 2024 14:31 - 365 posts
Axios: Exclusive Poll - America warms to mass deportations
Thu, April 25, 2024 11:43 - 1 posts
Case against Sidney Powell, 2020 case lawyer, is dismissed
Wed, April 24, 2024 19:58 - 12 posts
Grifter Donald Trump Has Been Indicted And Yes Arrested; Four Times Now And Counting. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Wed, April 24, 2024 09:04 - 804 posts
Slate: I Changed My Mind About Kids and Phones. I Hope Everyone Else Does, Too.
Tue, April 23, 2024 19:38 - 2 posts
No Thread On Topic, More Than 17 Days After Hamas Terrorists Invade, Slaughter Innocent Israelis?
Tue, April 23, 2024 19:19 - 26 posts
Pardon Me? Michael Avenatti Flips, Willing To Testify On Trump's Behalf
Tue, April 23, 2024 19:01 - 9 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL