REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

A blow for Palin fans everywhere....

POSTED BY: MRBLUESUN
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 08:46
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 6145
PAGE 2 of 3

Saturday, October 11, 2008 1:35 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
But if there were legitimate reasons then what difference to the personal reasons make? I can only fire people I like??????

Of course not, but my instinct tells me that she did it to eff with her dick brother-in-law's non-firing decider, not legitimate governing reasons, just like when I heard "I did not have sexual relations with that woman..." my instinct told me Clinton was doing a Pinnoccio without the nose growth.

Instinctual Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 1:40 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Righteous9:


Palin was found to have abused her authority because she tried to get the trooper fired

She also laced his toothpaste with a deadly poison, but lucky for him dental hygiene was a lower priority than kid-taserin'.

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 1:56 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Hey, I voted for Romney.


Don't blame me.



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 2:33 PM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:
The ACORN thing will be Obama's undoing. Gave them $ 800,000 from his campaign. Was their former mentor. Was their attorney. They're under FBI investigation in 8 states for voter fraud. They been convicted dozens of times before. They keep getting millions of dollars from Liberals, their offices have been raided by FBI and state investigators, and there are now piles of brand new sworn statements and un-deniable evidence testifying to gross voter registration fraud, numbering in the the 10's of thousands. That's 10,000's of crimes and felonies, almost exclusively favoring Democrats. And committed by recruited and funded Democrat operatives in the field. What's worse? Someone stealing your vote, or stealing your money? Answer. Democrats stole them both. And I'm sorry Dems, but there's a very clear and straight line from these felonious vote stealers to Obama and his campaign.

And by the way, you Obama supporters were certainly correct in your arched-back indignation over Palin's use of the term Community Organizer for Obama. I can see why. That's some community! ACORN, AYERS, WRIGHT, FLEAGER, , and of course, the big daddy, the millionnaire slumlord of the community, Tony the Man REZKO. Obama sure drank from Rezko's fountain now, didn't he? All of these despicable human beings and organizations are hardly simple and innocent associations for Obama as is the often-heard pitiful defense, rather more a brotherhood of radical purpose, including deep involvements and working relationships, in harmony of spirit and cause, and with large financial connections as well. The man had NO judgement, he was one of them, but now he doesn't like any of them anymore. Contemplate that my friends when your're getting all spun about with Palin.



I wish McCain had someone like Riverlove writing his campain comercials, he'd win in a landslide.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 2:39 PM

KHYRON


It's funny how the right ignores the facts when it comes to Obama's associations, and also ignores the facts when it comes to McCain's and Palin's associations. As Colbert said, reality just has a strong liberal bias.

Can SOMEBODY (ANYBODY!) please explain to me why it's alright to run for the White House and be married to a long-time secessionist!?

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 2:46 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:

I wish McCain had someone like Riverlove writing his campain comercials, he'd win in a landslide.

Riverlove brings up many cogent points- things to remember & keep an eye on, but none of that, let me repeat, NONE OF THAT mitigates the sheer lack O' brains on the Palin/McCain ticket.

In my (more) perfect world, it'd be Obama/Palin; now THAT would be interesting.

Hee hee Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 2:54 PM

KHYRON


Chris, having Palin on any ticket wouldn't be a more perfect world.

Another question I have: Why did Palin quote (uncredited) Westbrook Pegler, the mid-century Hearst columnist famous for his anti-Semitism, racism and violent rhetorical excess, in her convention speech?

What if Obama had done something similar, like quote Farrakhan? It would've been the end of his campaign.

I've asked so many questions in the last few weeks, I've not received a single answer to any of them. Which is depressing, because it shows me that the people on the right on this board know McCain/Palin are corrupt, have acted indefensibly in the past and are completely unfit for office, yet they still support them.

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 3:06 PM

MALBADINLATIN


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall: Riverlove brings up many cogent points- things to remember & keep an eye on, but none of that, let me repeat, NONE OF THAT mitigates the sheer lack O' brains on the Palin/McCain ticket.
Conservative candidates have sought solice on the hallowed ground Bush won on...way past the point on the political spectrum where church wins out over college as the best education one can obtain.

In this netherworld, no magazines or newspapers are read, computers are not operated, Putin flies over head trying to ruin oil and gas regulation in Alaska. Liberals are devils that destroy the economy, loose wars, and conspire with socialists and terrorists, and fancy talkin' "elitist" stranger folk are not welcome.

Thank the stars, god, whomever that those days are numbered.......jinx!! knock on wood!


Trolls against McCain

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 3:11 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Chris, having Palin on any ticket wouldn't be a more perfect world.

Okay, so I was being my usual idiot self in suggesting Obama/Palin; the in-fighting 'twixt them in office would be most entertaining, albeit completely unproductive.
Quote:


I've asked so many questions in the last few weeks, I've not received a single answer to any of them. Which is depressing, because it shows me that the people on the right on this board know McCain/Palin are corrupt, have acted indefensibly in the past and are completely unfit for office, yet they still support them.


Yeah, but let's not behave as if the Obama/Biden ticket is squeeky clean, at their heart, they still represent status quo BS, just a more palatable version IMO.

In a true more perfect world, we'd get Eastwood/Nader, but whatca gonna do?

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 3:31 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:


Another question I have: Why did Palin quote (uncredited) Westbrook Pegler, the mid-century Hearst columnist famous for his anti-Semitism, racism and violent rhetorical excess, in her convention speech?

What if Obama had done something similar, like quote Farrakhan? It would've been the end of his campaign.

I've asked so many questions in the last few weeks, I've not received a single answer to any of them. Which is depressing, because it shows me that the people on the right on this board know McCain/Palin are corrupt, have acted indefensibly in the past and are completely unfit for office, yet they still support them.



It's even worse than you know. Palin isn't just married to a secessionist - she has attended their convention SEVERAL times, and given addresses at it twice, INCLUDING THIS YEAR! She wants Alaska to separate from the United States, but still believes that she is the best person to serve as Vice President (and probably President within four years) of the United States.

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

Trolls Against McCain!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 3:33 PM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
It's funny how the right ignores the facts when it comes to Obama's associations, and also ignores the facts when it comes to McCain's and Palin's associations. As Colbert said, reality just has a strong liberal bias.

Can SOMEBODY (ANYBODY!) please explain to me why it's alright to run for the White House and be married to a long-time secessionist!?

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.


It seems like you're the one ignoring the facts when it comes to Obama's associations. Conservatives are well aware of McCain's flaws, but at this point he's our only option. Almost all politicians today are flawed in one way or another, we have made the judgment that McCain will do less damage than Obama. Politician are like policemen, just the fact that they want the job should disqualify them. You have to be somewhat screwed up to want either job. Just look at the recent 700 billion dollar bailout, by the time it got passed, dumb ass politicians added 150 billion in pork. The biggest financial crises in 100 years and they thought it was a good idea to load up the solution with what caused the problem in the first place, and McCain and Obama both supported it.

On the "secessionist" thing, I think it's a matter of what you think is worse, someone who thinks it's alright to pal around with a domestic terrorist or someone who theoretically believes that a State should be able to secede from the union. Thomas Jefferson thought so, and he's still a pretty popular dude where I come from. I think if you would take a poll of those living south of the Mason Dixon Line you'd find the majority still think secession in legal.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 3:48 PM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:
On the "secessionist" thing, I think it's a matter of what you thinks is worse, someone who thinks it's alright to pal around with a domestic terrorist or someone who theoretically believes that a State should be able to secede from the union.

Fine, just ignore the post I made about why Obama was associated with him and that even Republicans, including the mayor, are associated with him as well. Ignoring the facts is a well-known strategy by the GOP base - or is it a tactic?
Quote:

Thomas Jefferson thought so, and he's still a pretty popular dude where I come from. I think if you would take a poll of those living south of the Mason Dixon Line you'd find the majority still think secession in legal.
Alright, you have a VP candidate married to a guy who hates America so much that he doesn't want his home state to be a part of it, and you say that's just fine because people in the South are okay with it too? I'm not talking about the legality of it, I'm talking about the patriotism. You'll have a guy who doesn't respect America enough to want to be a part of it spitting tobacco and putting his feet on the desk in the Oval Office. Are you really okay with that, or are you just telling yourself you should be okay with that because having an educated liberal person in there is worse?

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 3:53 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:

On the "secessionist" thing, I think it's a matter of what you think is worse, someone who thinks it's alright to pal around with a domestic terrorist or someone who theoretically believes that a State should be able to secede from the union.

Kirk, my respect for you has increased with this post; your reasoning is, er, something, er, worthy of respect *not the best worded sentence ever*.

But really, is a person always a terrorist, even if he's renounced his past violent ways? Even if he's changed at his core beliefs? Is there no redemption?
Did Darth Vader not learn??
Can't Obama be allowed to consort with peeps that have a severely checkered past?
If not- then Bush is likely a terrorist as well, and surely Cheney, who palled around with Saddam hisself....

Now, if only Palin would give up her stupidity and embrace knowledge & geography....

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 4:05 PM

SWISH


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:
I wish McCain had someone like Riverlove writing his campain comercials, he'd win in a landslide.

Wow - I find that entertaining. I read RL's post and thought: OK, first Palin was the thing that was going to sink the Dems, and since Palin has turned out to be nothing but a dead weight on McCain, now it's this ACORN thing that'll do it.

Seems to me that folks like Riverlove are desperate for anything to back up their fear of Obama, and are ready to cling to any wispy thin thing that might do it. Which falls right in line with McCain's pathetic grasping for straws over the past few weeks, and which is precisely why he's losing independents, and hence the election. So - I don't see RL's approach as that much different than the one's that bombing for McCain right now.

But more than than that I have to wonder, and I was wondering it before things got so creepy in the past week: do you Obama haters really believe that he is a terrorist in disguise who is secretly out to destroy America?

Really, really really I'm wondering. Because my assumption so far has been that no one really believes that. You might be afraid of Obama for other reasons and think: "But hey, if we can convince the idiotic electorate, all those proles in Dumbf*ck, Oklahoma that Obama's a terrorist, then he'll lose and that's all that matters. Because McCain has better policies."

Hey, I sympathize with that. I certainly hoped for anything to keep Bush out in 2000 and 2004. Anything, really. I though Bush was bad for reasons that the regular electorate wasn't going to figure out, so I had to hope for *anything* to shut him down. Unfortunately, it didn't happen.

So I get it - scare the idiots enough with implausible BS about Barack "Hussein" and that's just better in the long run for you who love McCain. Right?

But the events of the past week have got me wondering: are you Obama haters not playing, but you really and truly believe that he's a Muslim terrorist America hater out to do nothing but tear the US down? Really, no snark here - do you really believe that?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 4:07 PM

KHYRON


Chris, you've also given me some head-scratchers in this thread, your last post complementing Kirkules on what was pure sophism is one of them, and here's another:
Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Yeah, but let's not behave as if the Obama/Biden ticket is squeeky clean, at their heart, they still represent status quo BS, just a more palatable version IMO.

I'm not arguing that the Obama/Biden ticket is squeaky clean, and arguing against this hate- and fear-mongering smear campaign shouldn't be seen as saying "My team is perfect!". Every independent, objective analysis of the Obama/Ayers relationship that I've seen has said that there's nothing at all sinister about it. Yet telling the real story behind the Ayers non-issue is seen as being "subjective" or "partisan".

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 4:12 PM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:

But really, is a person always a terrorist, even if he's renounced his past violent ways? Even if he's changed at his core beliefs? Is there no redemption?
Did Darth Vader not learn??
Can't Obama be allowed to consort with peeps that have a severely checkered past?
If not- then Bush is likely a terrorist as well, and surely Cheney, who palled around with Saddam hisself....

Now, if only Palin would give up her stupidity and embrace knowledge & geography....


I do think it's possible for someone to somewhat redeem themselves, but Ayers has very recently said things that lead me to believe he has not changed. He's just mellowed a little with age and so he can run in the liberal elite circles. I think Obama actually shares many of Ayres radical views, though I'm sure Obama would never condone violence. Darth Vader is a little harder case as he actually destroyed an entire planet. I don't think there's any coming back from that.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 4:25 PM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by swish:
So I get it - scare the idiots enough with implausible BS about Barack "Hussein" and that's just better in the long run for you who love McCain. Right?

But the events of the past week have got me wondering: are you Obama haters not playing, but you really and truly believe that he's a Muslim terrorist America hater out to do nothing but tear the US down? Really, no snark here - do you really believe that?


I think you have invented most of the Obama hatred you see in your own head. Nobody here that I've seen has suggested that Obama is a terrorist, just that it shows bad judgment hanging out with one. Most of the Conservatives here have said that they think Obama is a good man. I have quite a few liberal/socialist/commie friends and I have no problem with that. If any one of them ran for President I would appose them just as strongly as I appose Obama.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 4:25 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Chris, you've also given me some head-scratchers in this thread, your last post complementing Kirkules on his sophism is one of them

I just mean to say that giving reasoning of any sort trumps blind 'Obama is evil' rhetoric.
Quote:

and here's another:
Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Yeah, but let's not behave as if the Obama/Biden ticket is squeeky clean, at their heart, they still represent status quo BS, just a more palatable version IMO.

I'm not arguing that the Obama/Biden ticket is squeaky clean, and arguing against this hate- and fear-mongering smear campaign shouldn't be seen as saying "My team is perfect!".

No, I get that, I'm just trying to come at this from all angles to demonstrate to the right wingers that Obama is not the Chosen one who will liberate us from all the problems we now face. As far as I'm concerned, he's the sanest choice in this insane world.

Connorisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 4:29 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:
Nobody here that I've seen has suggested that Obama is a terrorist, just that it shows bad judgment hanging out with one.

I do not believe that occasional meetings constitute 'hanging out with'.
But your mileage may vary.

isall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 4:32 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:
Darth Vader is a little harder case as he actually destroyed an entire planet. I don't think there's any coming back from that.

Re: Bush, how about destroying a small part of one, does that count as well? Some Iraqis may beg to differ with you on that.

isall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 5:16 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

I have quite a few liberal/socialist/commie friends and I have no problem with that. If any one of them ran for President I would appose them just as strongly as I appose Obama.


I take it then that you are just as strongly opposed to the Bush Administration's "Surge" in Iraq? Because one of the key points of the surge is PAYING terrorists not to attack us. And then paying them to fight for us. In other words, our own military, at the behest of the White House and the Pentagon, is "palling around with" terrorists.

Also, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is known to have palled around with Saddam Hussein.

Or was that all in the distant past?

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

Trolls Against McCain!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 5:22 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Also, there's some evidence that Todd and Sarah Palin have their own checkered past when it comes to domestic terrorism, in the person of Alaska Indepence Party founder Joe Vogler:

Quote:



Vogler disappeared under suspicious circumstances in May 1993, just weeks before he was scheduled to give a speech to the United Nations on Alaskan independence, sponsored by the government of Iran. Convicted thief Manfried West confessed to having murdered Vogler the following year in what he described as a plastic explosives sale gone bad. Vogler's remains were discovered in a gravel pit east of Fairbanks in October 1994 following an anonymous tip. They had been wrapped in a blue tarp secured with duct tape and were identified through fingerprint analysis.

In the opinion of AIP Chair Lynette Clark and other AIP leaders, however, Vogler's death reflected more than a dispute with West. Clark has stated, "He was executed." She notes that Vogler was about to appear before the United Nations to address the issue of Alaskan independence: "The United States government would have been deeply embarrassed. And we can't have that, can we?"

Vogler was buried in Dawson City, Yukon Territory, Canada, fulfulling his wish that he not be buried under the American flag.



So what was a secessionist militia leader planning on doing with all those plastic explosives? Cooking moose, perhaps, or something more sinister?

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

Trolls Against McCain!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 5:23 PM

CHRISISALL


I appose Kirkules...

As opposed to opposeisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 5:45 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Guy was an asshole, Palin wanted his ass off the force - pushed the limits and stepped over em to do it, shit like that happens, especially in small towns.
I remain neutral on that aspect.

Quoting Pegler - so what, just cause he was a shithead and an asshole means he never said anything in his life that made sense ?
I mean, come on, Wernher von Braun was a former nazi, does that mean our space program is then evil because of that fact ?
Filed beneath notice or caring.

Married to a seccessionist - so what of it, it's an American value, even if it didn't work out last time cause we had a meglomaniac with a family history of insanity who was popping mercury (look up Blue Mass) during his time in the oval office.
Filed as a plus, actually.

Oh, and someone noted Jefferson supported secession - well then, shut the hell up about Ayers then, cause ole Jeffy boy also supported armed revolt and blowing shit up, both against the british (at which point he WAS a terrorist!) and against our own Government whenever it got out of sorts, or folk percieved that it did.

Besides which, america has plenty of radicals of all stripes, it's the presidents job to understand and relate to ALL americans, not just a single party, so I wouldn't bitch if either one of em had extended discussions with the Klan or Black Panthers, so long as they weren't takin money from them.

America's fulla different folks, some of whom are VERY different, and a president who can manage to best execute the will of those people and do so in a manner that most of them find acceptable - that's part of the job.

Most of this is, in the end, petty shit - McCains involvement with the Keating Five, that concerns me some, not necessarily due to any direct involvement so much as the poor judgement and flimsy ethics that got him mixed up in that mess in the first place.

Palin bothers me for reasons I've specified elsewhere, not the least of which being a closet zealot with a crusade in mind, and McCains visibly failing health does not give me warm fuzzies about the idea of this lady one step from the big chair.

Obama's lack of experience and affiliation with a party I can't stand is a big negative with me, but he's displayed admirable political and orator skill, however those things are not necessarily related to the skills to run the country, and thus he's a big question mark for me - and the possibility of him being steamrollered like Jimmy Carter quite frankly doesn't bother me so much as he picked a good choice for veep, and I'd *rather* he get steamrollered than abuse the broken walls around executive power that are all that remain these days.

Biden, now... he's smart, almost TOO smart - he's not a people person, or any great shakes as an orator or public figure, but the man gets shit DONE, and my primary concern about him is exactly what shit he intends to get done, cause he plays his cards real close, and happens to be quite masterful at the political equivalent of a magicians hand-fake.

Fact is, I don't LIKE either of these folk, but one of the things that convinced me to throw down for Obama, besides being totally creeped the fuck out by Palin when she tried to debate - is that McCain toes the party line as if it were the true gospel, and Obama was willing to do a little bucking, cause the Dems wanted Hillary soooo bad they were willing to do him dirty over it....

And yet HE walked away with the nomination, he ain't Bill Clinton slick, but Obama ain't nobodys fool either and does not regularly embarrass himself as the GOP candidates have done.

And the plain fact of it is - in the hands of the GOP, and with the Dems unwilling to reach down and find a pair, we've left our country in a pretty fuckin sorry shape, involved in a pair of futile and idiotic wars, a virtually destroyed economy, an infrastructure crumbling to bits, and everyone at each others throats... that is NOT a legacy of leadership to be proud of, and I do believe it's justifiable to reject their new fairhaired boy on that basis alone.

The answer to that is NOT to ram more of it down the throat of the american public with a police state and militarised security forces, but to start fixing the mess!

And all I see in the GOP's offerings is further ruin, I cannot support it.

That doesn't mean I LIKE the jugeared shitheel on the other end, it just means I think he's got a better chance of actually getting us moving in the right direction to solve some of this mess - and I know damn well if not clobbered by us about it, he WILL take it too far in the other direction, but what choice do we have at the current state of affairs ?

I am most certainly NOT going to trust the party that got us in this fucking mess, and now that we're in a hole, not only doesn't have the sense to stop digging, but wants to bring in a backhoe ?

Fuck that.

I'm going with the guy who might have sense enough to put down the goddamn shovel.

And if that offends ya, too bad.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 5:53 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:


That doesn't mean I LIKE the jugeared shitheel on the other end, it just means I think he's got a better chance of actually getting us moving in the right direction to solve some of this mess


As usual, what Frem said tm

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:14 PM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Quoting Pegler - so what, just cause he was a shithead and an asshole means he never said anything in his life that made sense ?
I mean, come on, Wernher von Braun was a former nazi, does that mean our space program is then evil because of that fact ?
Filed beneath notice or caring.

The point of the secessionist thing is to illustrate how easily the guilt-by-association angle can be turned around - for every dubious connection or association that Obama has (and Ayers isn't one of them), there are plenty worse on the other side.

And the hypocrisy is a general disillusionment I have with the current batch of conservatives. I don't particularly care about her quoting Pegler either, but we all know that had Obama quoted some unpopular character (e.g. Farrakhan, or even Wright), the conservatives wouldn't be able to stop shouting their fake outrage from every available media outlet for months afterwards. THAT was the point of bringing up Pegler.

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:21 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
It's funny how the right ignores the facts when it comes to Obama's associations, and also ignores the facts when it comes to McCain's and Palin's associations. As Colbert said, reality just has a strong liberal bias.

Can SOMEBODY (ANYBODY!) please explain to me why it's alright to run for the White House and be married to a long-time secessionist!?

------------------------------




It's apples and oranges, to be honest. Todd Palin is in NO SENSE WHAT SO EVER A " long time secessionist ". He looked into an minor politcal party for a few yrs, then decided to go another way, becoming an independent. Contrary to the 2 for 1 couples we see in politcs so often these days, that ain't Sarah and Todd. He's not running for V.P., she is.

There's a lot wrong with this country, and some feel that leaving it would be easier than to try to fix it. Liberals have made it clear they're willing to leave as well , and don't for a second try to deny that . Also, secessionist don't , as a rule, HATE nearly as much as the bombers or the racist that Obama hangs out with. So I'd shut your pie hole when wailing about there not being "equal coverage".



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:30 PM

KHYRON


How long was he in the AIP? 8 years, right? That doesn't say anything about his character to you? Or, more importantly, the type of characters that Sarah Palin pals around with? That's right, just forgive and forget...

It's true that Todd Palin isn't running for VP, but neither is William Ayers. And unlike Ayers, Todd Palin would be one heartbeat and one pillow away from the presidency.

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:41 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Todd Palin is in NO SENSE WHAT SO EVER A " long time secessionist ". He looked into an minor politcal party for a few yrs, then decided to go another way

Fuck you, you stupid, cherry pickin' idiotic, pathetic, unpatriotic douschebag, side yourself with the peeps that hate this country, why doncha??? Suck the blood from your fellow Americans' veins & call for more, you vampiric piece of elephant-humping, goose-stepping fan of rapture-embracing world-haters!!! You may want to see this planet end, like your Allmighty Bush, but I want to see it continue for our children, and their children, you slimy misanthrope!!!!!

Oh. I said I was done dealing with you directly.
Nevermind.

isall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:48 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:


It's apples and oranges, to be honest. Todd Palin is in NO SENSE WHAT SO EVER A " long time secessionist ". He looked into an minor politcal party for a few yrs, then decided to go another way, becoming an independent.



According to several articles,

Quote:


Sources... have not been able to find documents that would confirm [Sarah] Palin's actual membership in the organization. However, Palin has been associated with the group for 15 years and has taken part in a number of AIP events. While confirmation of her membership has not been found, it has been confirmed that her husband, Todd Palin, was in fact a member of the AIP for several years....as recently as 2002. It's interesting that Todd Palin cleaned up his membership in the group only when his wife decided to run for State-wide office.



Several sources have confirmed him as being registered as a member of the AIP for at least seven years (admittedly more than your claim of "a few years"), and Sarah Palin has attended their conventions and addressed them, telling them at their convention just this year, "Your party plays an important role in our state's politics. We have a great promise: to be a self-sufficient state. Good luck on a successful and inspiring convention. Keep up the good work, and God bless you.""

Quote:

Also, secessionist [sic] don't , as a rule, HATE nearly as much as the bombers or the racist that Obama hangs out with. So I'd shut your pie hole when wailing about there not being "equal coverage".


Yes, secessionist leader Joe Vogler was a fountain of love for America, as evidenced by his own words:

Quote:

Quotes from AIP Founder Joe Vogler:

Joe Vogler, made these comments in 1991, in an interview that's now housed at the Oral History Program in the Rasmuson Library at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.

"The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government," Vogler said in the interview, in which he talked extensively about his desire for Alaskan secession, the key goal of the AIP.

"And I won't be buried under their damn flag," Vogler continued in the interview, which also touched on his disappointment with the American judicial system. "I'll be buried in Dawson. And when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones home.

“I’m an Alaskan, not an American. I’ve got no use for America or her damned institutions.”



Just thought you should know what kind of "patriots" your beloved little Sarah pals around with...

Quote:

He's not running for V.P., she is.



Oh, so now it's your position that who one associates with has nothing to do with it, eh? Double standard, much?

Mike



This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

Trolls Against McCain!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:51 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Suck the blood from your fellow Americans' veins & call for more, you vampiric piece of elephant-humping, goose-stepping fan of rapture-embracing world-haters!!!


Like this?




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 6:56 PM

CHRISISALL


Precisely, Mike.

And CRAppy must protect his Master, so get your Mr. Pointy ready- just in case.

Buffyisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 7:32 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

I also can’t know that she abused her authority. You’re putting faith in the outcome of an investigation that could very likely be politically motivated.
Well, since it was a bipartisan enquiry and you seem to know so much about what "they" think, maybe you can tell us what their motivation might be,

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 9:25 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Some of my friends here in Alabama are essentially secessionists. These are the same people who’s overt patriotism for their country offends many of the liberals now hypocritically condemning Alaskan secessionists for their supposed lack of patriotism. I’m an avid state’s rightist. I strongly believe in the idea of confederacy, even as I disagree with it for practical reasons. One can be a secessionist and still love one’s country. The US has a long history of such thinking. But there is a big difference between holding an opinion or a belief and practicing a belief through terrorism, such as the Bill Ayers who stated in 2001 that not only does he not regret his use of terrorism, but doesn’t discount such activity in the future.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 11, 2008 9:52 PM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
One can be a secessionist and still love one’s country.

Does.not.com.pute.

How can one love one's country but not want one's state to be a part of it? Aren't those two mutually exclusive?

Genuinelyconfusedisall

------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 1:46 AM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
One can be a secessionist and still love one’s country.

Does.not.com.pute.

How can one love one's country but not want one's state to be a part of it? Aren't those two mutually exclusive?

Genuinelyconfusedisall


It's easy to see how someone might believe that succession might be necessary if you have witnessed the usurpation of your states rights by a federal government that no longer feels constrained by the Tenth Amendment. Alaska has been prevented from using it's vast natural resources by the federal government based on a ridiculous interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Clause. I think resistance by the States to the whims of the feds is just what this country needs to get back on track. The States have plenty of ability to resist the fed without any violence resulting.

“ The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. ” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Cons
titution

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 2:06 AM

RIVERLOVE


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:
Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:
The ACORN thing will be Obama's undoing. Gave them $ 800,000 from his campaign. Was their former mentor. Was their attorney. They're under FBI investigation in 8 states for voter fraud. They been convicted dozens of times before. They keep getting millions of dollars from Liberals, their offices have been raided by FBI and state investigators, and there are now piles of brand new sworn statements and un-deniable evidence testifying to gross voter registration fraud, numbering in the the 10's of thousands. That's 10,000's of crimes and felonies, almost exclusively favoring Democrats. And committed by recruited and funded Democrat operatives in the field. What's worse? Someone stealing your vote, or stealing your money? Answer. Democrats stole them both. And I'm sorry Dems, but there's a very clear and straight line from these felonious vote stealers to Obama and his campaign.

And by the way, you Obama supporters were certainly correct in your arched-back indignation over Palin's use of the term Community Organizer for Obama. I can see why. That's some community! ACORN, AYERS, WRIGHT, FLEAGER, , and of course, the big daddy, the millionnaire slumlord of the community, Tony the Man REZKO. Obama sure drank from Rezko's fountain now, didn't he? All of these despicable human beings and organizations are hardly simple and innocent associations for Obama as is the often-heard pitiful defense, rather more a brotherhood of radical purpose, including deep involvements and working relationships, in harmony of spirit and cause, and with large financial connections as well. The man had NO judgement, he was one of them, but now he doesn't like any of them anymore. Contemplate that my friends when your're getting all spun about with Palin.



I wish McCain had someone like Riverlove writing his campain comercials, he'd win in a landslide.


Kirkules, I appreciate your agreement. For me the most hysterical part of the Dem's position on Troopergate is that it may be the first time in recorded history that Liberals and other Dems support a police officer. It took an election for them to sacrifice their long-cherished hatred and suspicion of the police. Obama supporters think that everyone in America was all engaged and teary-eyed and star-struck watching the endless Democrat primary process. Everyone wasn't. Just weeding out Rev Al and Cynthia McKinney took them 92 debates. Lots of people never watched any of their debates, or heard their speeches. I remember seeing a few of their attack ads on TV against eachother.
Obama is the chosen one of the hard-core demented Left. I'm talking MoveON and Daily Kos radical, supported and vastly funded by George Soros. Then there's the cabal of crazies, Wright, Ayers, Farrakhan, Rezko et al. But even those dreadful reminders of Obama's judgement and purpose, whether in support, or his gross naivete in not knowing, pale in comparison to Obama's own shameful background of involvement with radicals and their various nefarious causes and methods. ACORN is the worst example of people attempting subterfuge against the basic American principle of one-man, one-vote. That's how they think. The facts and records show Obama as central in their training and legal representation, and of course direct funding from his campaign. ACORN also had their dirty little felonious hands in the mortgage mess. They aggressively pressured banks to cast aside basic tenets of fiscal responsibility to give mortgages to anyone. When banks resisted that insanity ACORN went to Washington DC and found supporters in Chris Dodd and Barney Franks. They already had Obama & Franklin Raines on their team. Then they all went to work to destroy and bankrupt Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under the guise of helping poor people. Along the way Obama, Dodd & Franks got millions for themselves. Franks got a little more, something special if ya know what I mean (wink, wink). The rest is history.

The Democrats have already bought victory cakes with Obama Wins scripted in blue icing. On CNN they even have this groovy colorey map that lights up with electoral votes, and no matter how they hit the buttons, Obama always wins, and they are just so happy telling us that! I change the channel and I've got NBC and their problem-child MSNBC telling us they have video of Sarah Palin sticking pins in woodchucks' eyes. Back in a minute. America will come to its' senses. Wall Street and the economy will stablize, may start to go up from a new bottom, and Obama as the front-runner will be scutinized more closely. The final grains of sand through the hourglass are sticky and slow.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 2:19 AM

KHYRON


Kirkules, thanks for the answer, and while what you say does make sense, I still think the gap between patriotism and secessionism is too big to be bridged. If one feels the fed is taking too many rights away from the state (no argument from me there), why not try to fight for legislation that gives the state more rights to manage its own resources instead of fighting to secede from the Union? The latter option still doesn't seem like a patriotic thing to do.

Btw, I'm not out to prove a point about Todd Palin at the moment, right now I'm genuinely confused about the secessionist mindset and want to understand it better.
Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:
Obama is the chosen one of the hard-core demented Left. I'm talking MoveON and Daily Kos radical

Don't forget the demented conservatives too!

http://www.dmagazine.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?nm=Core+Pages&type=gen&mod=Cor
e+Pages&tier=3&gid=B33A5C6E2CF04C9596A3EF81822D9F8E


Also read the comments.



------------------------------

McCain/Palin: The first presidential ticket that features two candidates who have both been found to have violated ethics standards.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 3:08 AM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
I appose Kirkules...

As opposed to opposeisall


You're one of those guys that stood around in the halls in high-school making fun of the retarded kids aren't you?

Retardedisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 3:13 AM

SWISH


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:
I think you have invented most of the Obama hatred you see in your own head.

"Kill him!" "Terrorist!" I'm not making that up. Nor am I making up the accusations McCain and Palin have made and kool-aid drinkers have echoed, that Obama is "hiding" something. That Obama needs to come clean about his "true" association with Ayers. What I want to know is: what the hell is he supposedly hiding? What is really to fear here? Specifically?

Quote:

He's Nobody here that I've seen has suggested that Obama is a terrorist, just that it shows bad judgment hanging out with one.
Surely you see how weak this is. Ayers is one of the hundreds of people Obama has encountered in his years as a politician. They worked on something unrelated to Ayer's past, and - more importantly - completely unrelated to Obama's presidency. Obama does not "pal" around with this guy. Obama does not adhere to Ayers's ideals. So where is the danger that has McCainites so up in arms?

The thing I find really bizarre is that you can take this tiny, irrelevant thing as evidence of some kind of monumentally poor judgement from Obama, and yet you don't question McCain's decision making skills. The Keating 5 financial scandal and McCain's lifelong support of non-regulation is much more relevant to the present Wall Street situation than who sat on a panel with Obama a long time ago.

And talking about relevant - how about McCain choosing an ignorant, vindictive, devisive running mate with a history of unethical behavior and abuse of power? Haven't we learned what happens to our govt when the president hands out jobs based on politics rather than merit? When politicians think that laws and ethics don't apply to them? I mean, I'd kind of prefer that the Justice Department not continue to be stocked with people like Sarah Palin. (God help us!) I'd like to have a JD that does it's nonpartisan job for a change.

That's the kind of judgement that matters in our next president - don't promote idiots! Who's the one promoting idiots here?


Quote:

I have quite a few liberal/socialist/commie friends and I have no problem with that. If any one of them ran for President I would appose them just as strongly as I appose Obama.
Note the difference from the Ayers situation: you would oppose your friends based on what you know about them, not based on some schmoe they had a cup of coffee with a decade ago.

Hey, if you want to argue against Obama's policies, please do. But policies are clearly not what this Ayers thing is about.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 3:22 AM

SWISH


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
It's apples and oranges, to be honest. Todd Palin is in NO SENSE WHAT SO EVER A " long time secessionist ". He looked into an minor politcal party for a few yrs, then decided to go another way, becoming an independent. Contrary to the 2 for 1 couples we see in politcs so often these days, that ain't Sarah and Todd. He's not running for V.P., she is.

And yet we've just had a bipartisan report stating that Todd did a whole lot of official work for her:

"Todd Palin would become a familiar voice for the Palin administration. Independent legislative investigator Stephen Branchflower's report on Monegan's subsequent firing -- in part, the investigation found, because he wouldn't fire Wooten -- contains an exhaustive record of Todd Palin's frequent and intimate presence in the day-to-day workings of his wife's administration.

Testimony compiled as part of the inquiry, and The Times' own review of e-mail logs from the administration, show that Todd Palin was a fixture in the governor's office, spending about half of his time there. He attended Cabinet meetings that are supposed to be closed to the public, and was copied on a wide variety of high-level government correspondence on issues such as contract negotiations with the police officers union, Alaska Native issues and the privatization of a dairy near the Palins' hometown of Wasilla."


http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-todd12-2008oct12,0,6624850.
story



Quote:

Also, secessionist don't , as a rule, HATE nearly as much as the bombers or the racist that Obama hangs out with.
Oh, I see. Yes, clearly it's written in the Universal Secessionist Charter that one must not ever go beyond Hate Factor 3, while the Friends of Obama Manifesto demands a Hate Factor of at least 7. Indeed, it's right there in the rules!!

What in the hell are you smoking, AURaptor?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 3:33 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by swish:


Quote:

Also, secessionist don't , as a rule, HATE nearly as much as the bombers or the racist that Obama hangs out with.
Oh, I see. Yes, clearly it's written in the Universal Secessionist Charter that one must not ever go beyond Hate Factor 3, while the Friends of Obama Manifesto demands a Hate Factor of at least 7. Indeed, it's right there in the rules!!

What in the hell are you smoking, AURaptor?




What the hell are YOU smoking ? Secessionist are those who simply want to dissolve the politcal bonds which connect them w/ our own country. I was responding to another post which was comparing Obama's friends ( Ayers and Rev Wright ) to Palin's HUSBAND's distant associates, a political party he no longer supports that favors secession to the USA. They don't want WAR with the U.S. they just want to govern themselves.



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 3:55 AM

SWISH


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
What the hell are YOU smoking ? Secessionist are those who simply want to dissolve the politcal bonds which connect them w/ our own country.

And they all follow a particular set of rules? Wow, how neat and tidy the world must look to you. Too bad it just isn't that way.

Quote:

I was responding to another post which was comparing Obama's friends ( Ayers and Rev Wright ) to Palin's HUSBAND's distant associates, a political party he no longer supports that favors secession to the USA. They don't want WAR with the U.S. they just want to govern themselves.

Hunh. You must have missed Kwicko's post, so let me just repeat:

Quote:

Joe Vogler, made these comments in 1991, in an interview that's now housed at the Oral History Program in the Rasmuson Library at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.

"The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government," Vogler said in the interview, in which he talked extensively about his desire for Alaskan secession, the key goal of the AIP.

"And I won't be buried under their damn flag," Vogler continued in the interview, which also touched on his disappointment with the American judicial system. "I'll be buried in Dawson. And when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones home.

“I’m an Alaskan, not an American. I’ve got no use for America or her damned institutions.”


No hate there. Nope. Nothing that could turn to violence. (Cause that would be against smokin' Rap's rules. ) No, surely it would go something like this: "Hey, can we Alaskans succeed from the Union? No? OK, then, we'll just sit up here and love America peacefully from afar, and maybe ask again in a decade or so. Thanks so much for your time! "


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 4:12 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


kwickie....

Todd was registered for a few yrs, but only ACTIVE for like 2. Gov. Palin's welcome video was nothing more than a chamber of commerce duty, where she's simply greeting the members of a group holding a convention in Fairbanks. Conventions bring in money to a city , and she was being nothing more than appreciative of that fact.

How many bombs did Joe Vogler plant? Oh, that'd be none.

BTW, Joe's been dead for 15 yrs now. I'm pretty sure Sara and Todd aren't palling around " with him any more.

No double standard when you compare Barack's direct ties to Bill Ayers and a 20+ yr relationship w/ a racist Reverend who teaches Black Liberation Theology to a dead guy who had no ties to the Palins.


Blah blah blah, personal insult , blah blah blah.....



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 4:29 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:

For me the most hysterical part of the Dem's position on Troopergate is that it may be the first time in recorded history that Liberals and other Dems support a police officer.

For the record, I believe he's probably a jerk.

isall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 4:38 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
One can be a secessionist and still love one’s country.

Oh, I get it, if they're Republican, right? But if you're NOT Republican, having a meeting with a terrorist means you HATE this country...see, this is why I can't take you seriously anymore, Finn, if Obama was a secessionist, you'd be flaming him for it, and if Palin was meeting with a terrorist, you'd say she was gathering info on other points of view- you are so laughably skewed in one direction, yet you seem able to convince yourself you're not somehow.

isall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 4:45 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:

http://www.dmagazine.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?nm=Core+Pages&type=gen&mod=Cor
e+Pages&tier=3&gid=B33A5C6E2CF04C9596A3EF81822D9F8E


Today it is conservatives, not liberals, who talk with alarming bellicosity about making the world “safe for democracy.” It is John McCain who says America’s job is to “defeat evil,” a theological expansion of the nation’s mission that would make George Washington cough out his wooden teeth.

This kind of conservatism, which is not conservative at all, has produced financial mismanagement, the waste of human lives, the loss of moral authority, and the wreckage of our economy that McCain now threatens to make worse.



Yep.

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 4:51 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Todd was registered for a few yrs, but only ACTIVE for like 2.
And Barack worked with Ayers for ONLY five years, actually seeing him face to face less than a dozen time and participated in NONE of the Weather Underground activities, seeing as all that wa going on when he was... er... eight. Don't you think there's a qualitative difference between being an ACTIVE MEMBER of a secessionist movement, and working with someone on a committee for education reform who had a (long ago) past history? I certainly think so! Why izzit you can excuse the one but not the other? Whatever happened to rationality? As others have so eloquently said, if the situation was reversed... if Michell Obama had been an active member of a secessionist movement you'd be all over THAT like white in rice. Instead you find all kinds of excuses what that shoe is on YOUR candidate's foot!
Quote:

One can be a secessionist and still love one’s country.
But apparently one can't be a republican and still love one's country, as you have made SO PLAIN to me!

Fuck you both, assholes!

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 4:59 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Chris, we're dealing with the hard-core authoritarian right here: Finn has unmasked himself, and we've known about Hero and Rapo for a long time. All they want to do is be folded into the bosom of their authority-figure, to see as they see, to think as they think and speak as they speak. They're frightened of "the other". I don't know what the answer is, but appeals to rationality won't work. They have NO INTEREST in being rational. They only want to be safe from whatever bogeymen their leaders have concocted for them.

Maybe if Obama is portrayed an authority-figure they'll bow under the lash. So how's THIS, ya right-wing morons: If Obama wins, YOU'LL be the new enemy. So:

Yo better watch out,
Yo better not cry,
Yo better not pout...
And I'm telling ya why...


Yeah, face your fears, you dickwads! Wallow in it until you know the length and breadth and depth of it. Until you're SICK of fear driving you!


---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 12, 2008 5:29 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Haven't we learned what happens to our govt when the president hands out jobs based on politics rather than merit?

Apparently not - but if you wanna lay blame for that idea, lay it at the feet of Andrew Jackson.

While he had the right idea concerning Federalised Banking, he was the first to fully implement a political "spoils system" in that fashion, not to mention his treatment of Native Americans was downright criminal.

The virtues of our historic figures have never blinded me to their faults, and thus the same for modern ones.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Fri, April 19, 2024 15:17 - 6268 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, April 19, 2024 13:27 - 3534 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Fri, April 19, 2024 13:10 - 743 posts
Elections; 2024
Fri, April 19, 2024 10:01 - 2274 posts
BREAKING NEWS: Taylor Swift has a lot of ex-boyfriends
Fri, April 19, 2024 09:18 - 1 posts
This is what baseball bats are for, not to mention you're the one in a car...
Thu, April 18, 2024 23:38 - 1 posts
FACTS
Thu, April 18, 2024 19:48 - 548 posts
Biden's a winner, Trumps a loser. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Thu, April 18, 2024 18:38 - 148 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Thu, April 18, 2024 17:58 - 777 posts
Why does THUGR shit up the board by bumping his pointless threads?
Thu, April 18, 2024 12:38 - 9 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Thu, April 18, 2024 10:21 - 834 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, April 17, 2024 23:58 - 1005 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL