REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

I will soon laugh at your pain

POSTED BY: WHOZIT
UPDATED: Tuesday, December 2, 2008 09:04
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 5516
PAGE 2 of 2

Monday, November 24, 2008 1:15 PM

SWISH


Quote:

Originally posted by deadlockvictim:
Quote:

Originally posted by swish:

Yeah, I think things slowly trend toward sanity......



good post Swish...

It's called Progress.... something that has been lacking for eight years...

Um, thanks. Not my ideas, but I'll take some credit for regurgitating.

Yes, progress would be nice for a change. Though one could figure that Bush made progress Since he got a whole lot of anti-neocons pissed off enough to get involved in politics.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 12:45 PM

STARTROOP


I have followed this discussion with some mirth and some angst and finally felt impelled to write, something that goes against my lurkers code ;-)

I am the guy both political parties hate. I am a moderate. I haven't voted a straight party ticket in my life. It is my opinion that both parties have some of it right and some of it wrong.

I find it funny in a dark way that smart people can pick apart the opposition and rightly castigate the politicoes of one stripe and then completely ignore and/or explain away the same things when their side does it. I can't be the only person who sees it but sometimes, like when I read threads like this I begin to think so.

I wish Barak Obama well. He has been dumped in a pile of feces and there is no way out without making a mess. His campaign was intentionally vague and allowed everyone rightly sick of the current situation to paint their hopes on him. There is now no way he can deliver. I think that he will probably a one term president.

I think the Republicans have some good points. IMHO they are as follows:

1. As a General Rule, less government is better.
2. It is better for me and you to spend our money the way we see fit vs. giving it to the government and having them spend it.
3. Personal firearms don't garantee freedom but they do make politicians more wary of fiat declarations.
4. A strong, seldom used, military is the best defense against a complex and unruley world.
5. We shouldn't build up a debt for our children to pay (even though our folks did it).

They have gone awry in the following areas in my humble opinion:

1. You can't Legislate morality. Attempts to do this lead towards inquisition.
2. Rumsfeld (I wonder how the man sleeps at night) who said we can sorta have a war and still have a good economy.
3. Attacking Iraq. (Afgainistan is another story).
4. Money can't fix everything.


IMHO, the Democrats have it right in the following ways:

1. We need to take better care of the planet as there are too many of us.
2. While we are all born with different talents, we should all have the opportunity to use them.
3. The best investment we have ever made in this country is public education. Dispite all the grief and redundancy and ineffiency, we went from a frontier economy to world power in 150 years.

I seriously wonder about the following:

1. There is a perception that there is an easy way out of the poverty cycle. There isn't, I learned this teaching low income students. The ones that make it out are smart, motivated, and work like dogs. No amount of money can give that to anyone.
2. Business is bad for America.
3. Everyone will leave us alone if we disarm and stay home. Unfortunately, since we are wealthy, others are think that they have a right to what we have earned.
4. McNamara (see Rumsfeld), If you are too young, look him up. Think Rumsfeld with red hair and a Democrat in the 60's.
5. Money can't fix everything.

To set the record straight, I am laughing at no one's pain. In this year's election, we needed someone with gumption, brains, and charisma. What we got from both parties was second rate politicians. Sometimes, from the back bench we get greatness, but I don't see it here. Where have the people like Truman, Reagan, and Theodore Rooosevelt gone? We need them now.

There, I vented my spleen. I suspect I have pissed some of you off. My apologies, but if I made you think a bit, then maybe there is some value here.

My shields are up and I stand ready ;-)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:57 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Welcome to the shark infested pool that is RWED, Startroop.

You ain't offended me, I for one welcome folk who reason and think even if I don't agree.

Although you can keep Truman, Reagan and Roz, lol.

By choice if I could clone a president right now it would probably be Eisenhower.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 9:18 AM

STARTROOP


I actually think a lot of Eisenhower. He was a hell of a politician and could make a decision. One of my treasured books growing up was "At Ease, Stories I Tell With My Friends", that he wrote. It wasn't an official biography, just stories about his life.

I would settle for someone with the good sense of an Eisenhower. I am very unhappy with the choices I was left with this year.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 10:08 AM

MALBADINLATIN


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
By choice if I could clone a president right now it would probably be Eisenhower.

Eisenhower was so rational, how about Goldwater even though he wasn't President? a little to fire of the godsey?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 10:15 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

By choice if I could clone a president right now it would probably be Eisenhower.


I like Ike.


The Indy-like Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 27, 2008 11:20 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by startroop:
I have followed this discussion with some mirth and some angst and finally felt impelled to write, something that goes against my lurkers code ;-)

I am the guy both political parties hate. I am a moderate. I haven't voted a straight party ticket in my life. It is my opinion that both parties have some of it right and some of it wrong.

I find it funny in a dark way that smart people can pick apart the opposition and rightly castigate the politicoes of one stripe and then completely ignore and/or explain away the same things when their side does it. I can't be the only person who sees it but sometimes, like when I read threads like this I begin to think so.

I wish Barak Obama well. He has been dumped in a pile of feces and there is no way out without making a mess. His campaign was intentionally vague and allowed everyone rightly sick of the current situation to paint their hopes on him. There is now no way he can deliver. I think that he will probably a one term president.

I think the Republicans have some good points. IMHO they are as follows:

1. As a General Rule, less government is better.
2. It is better for me and you to spend our money the way we see fit vs. giving it to the government and having them spend it.
3. Personal firearms don't garantee freedom but they do make politicians more wary of fiat declarations.
4. A strong, seldom used, military is the best defense against a complex and unruley world.
5. We shouldn't build up a debt for our children to pay (even though our folks did it).

They have gone awry in the following areas in my humble opinion:

1. You can't Legislate morality. Attempts to do this lead towards inquisition.
2. Rumsfeld (I wonder how the man sleeps at night) who said we can sorta have a war and still have a good economy.
3. Attacking Iraq. (Afgainistan is another story).
4. Money can't fix everything.


IMHO, the Democrats have it right in the following ways:

1. We need to take better care of the planet as there are too many of us.
2. While we are all born with different talents, we should all have the opportunity to use them.
3. The best investment we have ever made in this country is public education. Dispite all the grief and redundancy and ineffiency, we went from a frontier economy to world power in 150 years.

I seriously wonder about the following:

1. There is a perception that there is an easy way out of the poverty cycle. There isn't, I learned this teaching low income students. The ones that make it out are smart, motivated, and work like dogs. No amount of money can give that to anyone.
2. Business is bad for America.
3. Everyone will leave us alone if we disarm and stay home. Unfortunately, since we are wealthy, others are think that they have a right to what we have earned.
4. McNamara (see Rumsfeld), If you are too young, look him up. Think Rumsfeld with red hair and a Democrat in the 60's.
5. Money can't fix everything.

To set the record straight, I am laughing at no one's pain. In this year's election, we needed someone with gumption, brains, and charisma. What we got from both parties was second rate politicians. Sometimes, from the back bench we get greatness, but I don't see it here. Where have the people like Truman, Reagan, and Theodore Rooosevelt gone? We need them now.

There, I vented my spleen. I suspect I have pissed some of you off. My apologies, but if I made you think a bit, then maybe there is some value here.

My shields are up and I stand ready ;-)



You have to WONDER about McNamara? You seemed reasonable until that, but you did admit you were a teacher, and implied an public school version.

Welcome to the un-lurked. FFF is actually the only forum that I didn't lurk at, jumped right in when I found it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 6:58 AM

STARTROOP


I don't wonder about McNamara except perhaps how he slept at night. I do teach, at a university. I am a product of both public and private schools. As to why I feel the way I do, I wasn't always a professor. I started life as a career officer in the military and was injured in an aircraft accident. I saw the results of both McNamara's and Rumsfled's policies first hand.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 7:13 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by startroop:
Where have the people like Truman, Reagan, and Theodore Rooosevelt gone? We need them now.


Startroop, THIS is where I had a problem..REAGAN??? Sure he was a good TV President, but *coughIRAN-CONTRA* He was the puppet theatre personified- he was a simple thinker, & clueless as to the actual machinations of the CIA, North's actions, the Sandinistas and most everything else. He didn't wanna bluff the Soviet Union into over-extending themselves, he actually thought that Star Wars defense thing COULD WORK!! It happened to have the desired effect by accident! C'mon, you're a teacher, please explain you admiration for this guy...?


The curious Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 9:16 AM

STARTROOP


It is pretty clear we have differing perceptions of Ronald Reagan. I'll hit this on two levels. First, I'll be as clear as I can on why I think he was among our top ten presidents. THen I want to ask you about what you mean by some of the statements you make denigrating Reagan.

Why I think he was an excellent president:

1. He was a good judge of people and could attract first rate people to work for him. With a couple of significant errors, he was able to entice bright, aggressive people to work for him and then get them to work together as a team.

2. He could make a decision. So many of our politicians waffle. This includes the current president (I have nothing yet to judge the president elect on). As a former military aviator, I was taught and came to believe that you need to make a decision at the right time and that the wrong decision pursued with enough aggression that occurs at the right time is often better than the perfect answer given too late.

3. He was charismatic (I think you used the term "TV President"). He had the ability to unite a large percentage of a America behind an idea. He understood political theater and how to inspire. I could give you examples but for the sake of brevity, Roosevelt and Truman both played that game well too.

4. He was able to articulate problems so that most people could understand them. He was really an able communicator.

5. He was pursuasive. He could sell not only the public but heads of corporations and heads of state on his ideas.

I do think though that he started the process too late. In the last year of his presidency, it was clear that his mental processes were slipping. Who ever was able to get to him first on an issue usually got their way and like FDR, his wife ran the show a lot more near then end then we will likely ever know.

You mentioned the Iran/Contra fiasco. He was the president and Commnader in Chief so he was responsible for the actions of his subordinates.

Having said that it clearly wasn't his idea. He thought on a much grander scale. This was obviously someone (probably several someones) in middle level government who couldn't get their agenda funded and so went through the back door. I can't concieve of how they thought that they could keep something like that a secret. They clearly chose to reach a short term goal at the expense of a long term policy. History has and will judge them accordingly. I knew there was a coverup when the scape goat was Lt. Col. Ollie North. He was obviously the cut out man.

You did make two statements that I am curious about:

1. Reagan was a simple thinker. What precisely does that mean?

2. You also said that he obviously believed in "Star Wars" and that it wasn't designed to over extend the Soviet Union. How do you know that?

The concept of over extending the Soviet Union's resource base was ongoing long before he left the Screen Actor's Guild and the Democratic Party. What he did was to utilize his ability to play political theater to get the Soviet Union to put up or shut up. They had for years avoided issues when it became clear that they couldn't win in a competition. He made them lose face. He obviously couldn't say "I am only doing this for the benefit of the Societ Union" and make it work. To be beleiveable, it had had to seem real.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 11:05 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by startroop:


Having said that it clearly wasn't his idea. He thought on a much grander scale. This was obviously someone (probably several someones) in middle level government who couldn't get their agenda funded and so went through the back door.

Okay, now I got a bead on your age- you are clearly under forty. Reagan told Ollie North to "Help the Contras, I don't want another Cuba in this part of the world." He didn't tell him how to do it, and he didn't wanna know. Plausible deniability, you see. Ollie was prepared to take the fall if it got out, and saw himself as a patriot for doing so. The slimy horrors the Contra were capable of were kept from Reagan, who thought them comparable to the 'rebels' in Star Wars.
Quote:



1. Reagan was a simple thinker. What precisely does that mean?

Read the Reagan Diaries for a taste, he makes no conclusions, no analysis, & displays no critical thinking beyond that of a 12th grader doing an assignment. He offers up thoughtful nuggets like "Getting shot hurts."
Quote:


2. You also said that he obviously believed in "Star Wars" and that it wasn't designed to over extend the Soviet Union. How do you know that?


He didn't understand the science involved with what he was talking about, or how impossible to achieve it was (I did, and I found it preposterous). If he had any inkling that the idiots in the Kremlin were gonna do themselves in by trying to keep up, it wasn't from his initial understanding of the overall issue. He simply believed we could outdo them technologically- remember, he was old-time, cordless phones were like science fiction to him.
(The preceding was merely an opinion based on available data)

His main strength was the same one Kennedy had- if he said it, he meant it.
Doesn't mean he always understood it.


The winky Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 11:08 AM

STARTROOP


Under forty? Thank you ;-) I haven't been under forty since Clinton was in the White House ;-)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 11:17 AM

CHRISISALL


Deleted for gross inaccuracy.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 11:30 AM

RIVERLOVE


Don't forget the utter financial mess that Jimmy Carter left for him too.....

14% interest rates
12% un-employment

Reagan's tax cuts to business helped create millions of new jobs, and by the end of his first term interest & un-emploment rates were back in the single digits. Carter left the country's economy actually worse than Bush is leaving it by a long shot. Reagan's Admininstration also pushed Gorbachev into Peristroika and openness, which ultimately led to the end of the Soviet Union.

Not too shabby a legacy for a guy who made movies with monkeys.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 11:35 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:
Don't forget the utter financial mess that Jimmy Carter left for him too.....

14% interest rates
12% un-employment

Reagan's tax cuts to business helped create millions of new jobs, and by the end of his first term interest & un-emploment rates were back in the single digits.

True.
Quote:

Carter left the country's economy actually worse than Bush is leaving it by a long shot.
I wouldn't go THAT far, SONNY.
Quote:

Reagan's Admininstration also pushed Gorbachev into Peristroika and openness, which ultimately led to the end of the Soviet Union.

Not too shabby a legacy for a guy who made movies with monkeys.

If ya look at it that way....

I just wished he'd been a little more pro-active when it came to being aware of what the black bag guys were up to, in that area he was clueless.


The bagging Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 11:38 AM

STARTROOP


Son, I was on that mission. I have friends now long dead whose memory I will not profane by dragging out the details of that night in this forum. I will say this one thing. The failure of that mission was NOT a set up to win political points.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 11:45 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by startroop:
Son, I was on that mission. I have friends now long dead whose memory I will not profane by dragging out the details of that night in this forum. I will say this one thing. The failure of that mission was NOT a set up to win political points.

If my info on the sand shields is incorrect, I'd like to know- but if I offended you in any way with any perceived glibness on my part, I apologize, I'm just kinda shoot from the hip that way, don't mean to be insensitive.
And if you don't respond, I'll understand.


The sometimes-foot-in-mouth Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 12:24 PM

STARTROOP


No, I don't think you ever, will, really understand. I will tell you this much, it is pretty clear to me that you have never been involved or seriously studied military aviation.

People who fly for a living and esspecially who are going in harm's way do not leave the preparation of their aircraft to amateurs or to chance.

The CIA never has had anything to do with aircraft maintenance or preparation of aircraft for the regular military. They don't have the experience or frankly the trust of the active military to be trusted to do as much as bring a sack lunch. That has been true since WWII and the OSS. All of their exploits come from the various aviation front companies they have built. Your premise falls flat on it's face.

It's also pretty clear you are prone to throw stones at passing cars and then profess ignorance that your actions cause anger or might even be a bit inappropriate.

If you are as old as you suggest, perhaps it's time you grew up a bit and thought about the consequences of your actions.

It is also clear I would be better served not raising my blood pressure by reading this thread anymore. I wish you all well.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 12:34 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by startroop:

If you are as old as you suggest, perhaps it's time you grew up a bit and thought about the consequences of your actions.


Suggestion noted.
Apology expanded.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 4:49 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

The CIA never has had anything to do with aircraft maintenance or preparation of aircraft for the regular military. They don't have the experience or frankly the trust of the active military to be trusted to do as much as bring a sack lunch.

Entirely correct.

And should you still be reading if not posting to, this thread, I completely understand your feelings on the matter and reluctance to discuss what little you'd be able to discuss anyhows.

It's a hell of a thing to get stuck with an impossible suck job, try to do it, have things go to hell in a handbasket, and then get crapped on and blamed by the very folk that you TOLD it was near impossible in the first place.

The only situation I can remember worse were the last relief flights going into Biafra, getting in was hard enough, getting out again was a miracle.

Don't wind yourself up over it Startroop, ok ?

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 1, 2008 4:53 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Oh yes, and Chris ?

Not all black baggers are by default, bad folk.

General Odom wasn't, Col Hackworth wasn't - others who I'll not name cause they're still alive, ain't either.

Nor do all of them, or even the better ones, work directly for Unca Sam.

Just for reference.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, December 2, 2008 4:52 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Oh yes, and Chris ?

Not all black baggers are by default, bad folk.


That's a point worth making, I mean, technically, isn't Bond one at times?

I just feel badly that I opened up a wound in a fellow Browncoat by way of my own ignorance.





The arrogant Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, December 2, 2008 8:13 AM

STARTROOP


I am still lurking, I posted originally on a whim. Probably safer that way ;-) As to getting wound up, it's a little late, I was not really able to function well yesterday at all. That and other misconceptions are floating around about that mission and frankly most of them are made up by people with very limited understanding of the events in question with a political agenda. Frem is right, I can't dispell most of them legally even though most are fecal matter.

To Chris, yes, you poked at an old wound and yes it burst in your face. I should have had more control. Unfortunately, when you pop off with something half baked like that, it casts doubt on everything else you said, valid or not.

This goes back to my original premise that where politics are concerned, people are selectively blind.

I don't know the answer to that one. Frankly, I am not sure I know how to accurately frame the question.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, December 2, 2008 9:04 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by startroop:
As to getting wound up, it's a little late, I was not really able to function well yesterday at all.

Again, sincere apologies.
Quote:


To Chris, yes, you poked at an old wound and yes it burst in your face. I should have had more control. Unfortunately, when you pop off with something half baked like that, it casts doubt on everything else you said, valid or not.

For what it's worth, it taught me something, and for that I thank you. I shall try to choose my words more carefully, and leave partisan rumours by the wayside.




The grateful Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Fri, April 19, 2024 19:59 - 2275 posts
The predictions thread
Fri, April 19, 2024 19:18 - 1090 posts
Biden's a winner, Trumps a loser. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Fri, April 19, 2024 18:40 - 149 posts
With apologies to JSF: Favorite songs (3)
Fri, April 19, 2024 18:08 - 53 posts
President Meathead's Uncle Was Not Eaten By Cannibals
Fri, April 19, 2024 17:21 - 1 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, April 19, 2024 17:03 - 3535 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Fri, April 19, 2024 15:17 - 6268 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Fri, April 19, 2024 13:10 - 743 posts
BREAKING NEWS: Taylor Swift has a lot of ex-boyfriends
Fri, April 19, 2024 09:18 - 1 posts
This is what baseball bats are for, not to mention you're the one in a car...
Thu, April 18, 2024 23:38 - 1 posts
FACTS
Thu, April 18, 2024 19:48 - 548 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Thu, April 18, 2024 17:58 - 777 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL