REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Capitalism

POSTED BY: RUE
UPDATED: Saturday, June 27, 2009 00:14
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 751
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, June 26, 2009 6:45 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


The report examined governmental responses to the exploitation of people, including children, for the purposes of forced labor, sex and stolen organs. At least 12.3 million adults and children are used to sustain the thriving business of modern-day slavery, though the real number is probably much higher given that human traffickers have little interest in divulging exact data.

The global financial crisis has fuelled the demand for cheap labor, making the exploitation of the most vulnerable people part and parcel of the economic recovery plans of many companies, and even countries. Under these circumstances, there should be little doubt that the UN's once promising campaign to eradicate much of the world's hunger by 2015 is already a pipedream.

One of the testimonies cited in the State Department's report was that of Mohamed Selim Khan, who "woke up in a strange house and felt an excruciating pain in his abdomen. Unsure of where he was, Khan asked a man wearing a surgical mask what had happened. 'We have taken your kidney,' the stranger said. 'If you tell anyone, we'll kill you.'"

Khan's experience epitomizes the nightmare of millions of people around the world, as they struggle to provide for hungry families. Their plight is no secret. It can be seen on the streets of many cities around the world, from Europe to Asia and Central America to the Gulf, where worn out, haggard looking men in dirty uniforms are working long hours for little pay, trapped between pressing needs at home and the merciless demands of their "recruitment agencies".

But cheap or forced labor is not the only form of human trafficking. According to the UN's Global Report on Trafficking in Persons, based on data collected in 155 countries, "the most common form of human trafficking [79 per cent] is sexual exploitation".

IRIN News, affiliated with the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, reported on 18 June that "women from the former Soviet Union and China are still being trafficked across the border with Egypt into Israel for forced prostitution by organized criminal groups". Israel has been identified as a "prime destination for trafficking by both the State Department and the UN Office on Drugs and Crime". One Israeli gang alone, according to the report, has trafficked over 2,000 women into Israel and Cyprus in the last six years.



***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 6:57 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Oh, but Rue! Don't you know? MONEY ALONE can't create oppression! Capitalists are the GOOD guys!

----------------------
We should have strapped him into a glider, filled it nose heavy w/ explosives, and dropped his Allah lovin' ass into a large, empty field. After which, release wild boars into the area so they could make good use of his remains. Now THAT's justice.- rappy

Yeah, that's what Sheikh Issa said. Seems you both have a lot in common.- signy

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 7:01 AM

SERGEANTX


Slavery is bad, no doubt about it. From the title, I thought the thread was going to be about capitalism.


SergeantX

"It's a cold and it's a broken hallelujah"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 7:03 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Capitalism: private ownership of the means of production (includng people).

Sarge, you keep saying that gubmint is the root of all evil. Nonetheless, if you put economics strictly in charge of the functioning of society, you WILL get some people with overwhelming power: the power to buy their own security, the power to own people, the power to kill, the power to exploit many, the power to form a monopoly, and the power to issue company scrip.

What countervailing force do you propose to keep things "fair"? Aside from wishful thinking, that is?

----------------------
We should have strapped him into a glider, filled it nose heavy w/ explosives, and dropped his Allah lovin' ass into a large, empty field. After which, release wild boars into the area so they could make good use of his remains. Now THAT's justice.- rappy

Yeah, that's what Sheikh Issa said. Seems you both have a lot in common.- signy

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 7:19 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


So....?

I read your other post about "Socialism". The answer to government oppression is, of course, a functioning democracy. What is YOUR answer to economic oppression, if any? (Other than to say it doesn't exist. Which it clearly does.)


----------------------
We should have strapped him into a glider, filled it nose heavy w/ explosives, and dropped his Allah lovin' ass into a large, empty field. After which, release wild boars into the area so they could make good use of his remains. Now THAT's justice.- rappy

Yeah, that's what Sheikh Issa said. Seems you both have a lot in common.- signy

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 7:52 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


And according to your other thread, the answer is

*closes eyes, plugs ears, sticks head firmly in sand*
LA LA LA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU! IT DOESN'T EXIST!





Go run your little world.



----------------------
We should have strapped him into a glider, filled it nose heavy w/ explosives, and dropped his Allah lovin' ass into a large, empty field. After which, release wild boars into the area so they could make good use of his remains. Now THAT's justice.- rappy

Yeah, that's what Sheikh Issa said. Seems you both have a lot in common.- signy

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 8:37 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


He apparently didn't read this:

"... exploitation of people, including children, for the purposes of forced labor, sex and stolen organs."

Not by gummint - by BUSINESS - for PROFIT.

Well, I guess in his mind, this just doesn't exist.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 8:44 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


So, Rue. As usual you forgot to provide a cite for your quote, and also left out a good bit of the text. Cherry-picking, perhaps?

http://www.amin.org/Print.php?t=ENews&id=2959

Also, maybe you should have provided a link to the actual Human Trafficking report, rather than an article by someone who's obviously not a fan.

http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/tiprpt/2009/

Third, this relates Capitalism to human trafficking in about the same way an earlier thread tried relating the demonstrations in Iran with President Obama taking his kids for ice cream - in other words, not at all.


"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 8:57 AM

BYTEMITE


Well... I actually don't know if the link is that forced, Geezer. If there weren't demand for sex slaves, organs, and labour... would this sort of activity exist?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 10:25 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Well... I actually don't know if the link is that forced, Geezer. If there weren't demand for sex slaves, organs, and labour... would this sort of activity exist?



Was there a demand for sex slaves and slave labour in the 17th century, prior to capitalism? The 10th century? the 1st? The 5th BCE? You don't think there was slave labour or sex slavery in Soviet Russia, or today in North Korea?

Conflating capitalism with slavery is like conflating the need to eat to survive with obesity.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 10:46 AM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Was there a demand for sex slaves and slave labour in the 17th century, prior to capitalism? The 10th century? the 1st? The 5th BCE? You don't think there was slave labour or sex slavery in Soviet Russia, or today in North Korea?



Only to the extent that they were proto-capitalists. And, all this stuff will go away if we achieve worldwide socialism. Bad people will just give up when profit is against the law.

SergeantX

"It's a cold and it's a broken hallelujah"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 10:51 AM

BYTEMITE


...I know everyone likes to credit Mr. Adam Smith with the invention of the idea in the 1700s, but capitalism existed LONG, LONG before then.

Or what do you think the Spanish Armada was looking for in South America?

Or what do you think the Romans and Greeks were using for currency?

Do you think America is the first country in the world to EVER have a market system?

It's not.

Capitalism existed in the times you mention, and, yes, I do think that the accumulation of wealth in those times enabled Sultans to have harems, and Egyptians to go to war, and bring back spoils such as slave labour. I believe all of this was DRIVEN by metal coinage.

In a barter system, back when women were considered possessions, yes, people could probably trade objects for a man's daughter and get themselves a wife. So non-capitalistic systems don't necessarily preclude human trafficking.

But, capitalism is set up to create gaps between haves and have nots, and is built upon exploiting a labour class. I would say that capitalism exacerbates the problem, and I think the link here is stronger than you give credit for.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 11:04 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
...I know everyone likes to credit Mr. Adam Smith with the invention of the idea in the 1700s, but capitalism existed LONG, LONG before then.


Capitalism is a distinct economic system, largely epitomised by the use of Capital as a means and an end, rather than just a means as in previous economic systems. That's why it's called Capital-ism.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 11:32 AM

BYTEMITE


I think you lost me. Are you saying those economic systems, the ones that had markets and a bourgeois, aren't capitalism?

As opposed to, say, the political/social systems of the time, like feudalism, or democracy, or despotism, or a republic?

An economic system is always married to a political system. Unless you are saying that Capitalism in the modern day is a rejection of the political/social pairing? Or is that the more extreme supporters of Capitalism?

I consider myself Anarcho-Socialist, but I think that still means I believe in a political system. The same goes for Libertarian Capitalists, of which there are many on this board.

Personally, Capitalists, I have no beef with you, so long as you are Libertarian. I think any Anarcho-Socialist community could allow for an individual to create an idea and live in a sort of niche market. Like in a market system, the community would reward such an individual by desiring their product and trading for their product in such a way that the Capitalist profits, if that is how the Capitalist chooses to distribute... So long as the production means do not turn into slavery.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 11:46 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
I think you lost me. Are you saying those economic systems, the ones that had markets and a bourgeois, aren't capitalism?


Yep. Capitalism is a particular type of economic system that uses markets and companies in a particular way, and sees trade and companies etc. in a unique way also.
Quote:

As opposed to, say, the political/social systems of the time, like feudalism, or democracy, or despotism, or a republic?

Those are social systems, capitalism is purely an economic system. It can, conceivable, exist alongside any of those.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 11:52 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
I think you lost me. Are you saying those economic systems, the ones that had markets and a bourgeois, aren't capitalism?


Today's capitalism means that it's not enough to have all the toys, but that no one else can have as many as YOU.


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 11:53 AM

BYTEMITE


But corporate capitalism didn't exist in the 1700s either, unless you count the East India Company. In the 1700s, most of the market was still small business owners and an apprenticeship system. I think you are focusing on modern capitalism too much, and dismissing the influence capitalism has had historically.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 11:55 AM

BYTEMITE


However, I will agree that capitalism as it operates today presents a large problem, that must be addressed. Corporations can't be trusted, anymore than the rich upper classes of centuries past could.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 12:07 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
But corporate capitalism didn't exist in the 1700s either, unless you count the East India Company. In the 1700s, most of the market was still small business owners and an apprenticeship system. I think you are focusing on modern capitalism too much, and dismissing the influence capitalism has had historically.


No, I'm saying that Capitalism in any form didn't exist prior to the 1700's. Mercantilism may have had similar problems to Capitalism, but it's approach to trade and economies is distinct. Modern Corporations didn't exist prior to the late 1930's, but the term company has been used to describe business partnerships since the very early days of Mercantilism, the 1500's maybe earlier.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 12:12 PM

BYTEMITE


Um.

Quote:

Mercantilism is an economic theory that holds that the prosperity of a nation is dependent upon its supply of capital. ~wikipedia


I mean, I guess if you don't think they're synonymous... But I do.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 12:28 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Um.

Quote:

Mercantilism is an economic theory that holds that the prosperity of a nation is dependent upon its supply of capital. ~wikipedia


I mean, I guess if you don't think they're synonymous... But I do.


Maybe you should read that entry, because Adam Smith was actually arguing against Mercantilism when he published The Wealth of Nations, so it's hard to see how a system proposed to replace another can be a synonym of it. Even your quote refutes the charge.

Mercantilism says the prosperity of a nation is based on is supply of capital, or more correctly how much precious metals the nation has in reserve. Capitalism measures prosperity by annual turnover, not capital supply. Capitalism sees trade as a Positive Sum game, both sides can profit from the deal, while Mercantilism sees trade as a Zero-sum game, one party takes advantage of the other. There's more differences, but those alone show they're not synonymous.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 26, 2009 1:40 PM

BYTEMITE


The way I see it, he was just proposing mercantilism in a different form. But, I can see we aren't going to agree on this.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 27, 2009 12:14 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
The way I see it, he was just proposing mercantilism in a different form. But, I can see we aren't going to agree on this.


In the same way Karl Marx was proposing Capitalism in a different form, yeah.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, March 29, 2024 02:54 - 3414 posts
BUILD BACK BETTER!
Fri, March 29, 2024 02:49 - 11 posts
Russia says 60 dead, 145 injured in concert hall raid; Islamic State group claims responsibility
Fri, March 29, 2024 00:45 - 56 posts
Elections; 2024
Fri, March 29, 2024 00:33 - 2075 posts
Long List of Celebrities that are Still Here
Fri, March 29, 2024 00:00 - 1 posts
China
Thu, March 28, 2024 22:10 - 447 posts
Biden
Thu, March 28, 2024 22:03 - 853 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, March 28, 2024 17:20 - 6155 posts
Well... He was no longer useful to the DNC or the Ukraine Money Laundering Scheme... So justice was served
Thu, March 28, 2024 12:44 - 1 posts
Salon: NBC's Ronna blunder: A failed attempt to appeal to MAGA voters — except they hate her too
Thu, March 28, 2024 07:04 - 1 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, March 27, 2024 23:21 - 987 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Wed, March 27, 2024 15:03 - 824 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL