REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

US drone strikes: Memo reveals case for killing Americans

POSTED BY: GEEZER
UPDATED: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 05:52
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 5554
PAGE 3 of 3

Monday, February 11, 2013 3:23 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
Listen, we were expecting a bunch of backwards luddites with a hatred for western technology to not only be able to locate Al Qaeda in the difficult mountainous cave-ridden topography of northern Afghanistan and west Pakistan and turn them over to us, but we also just assumed they knew where Al Qaeda really was, because as we all know, every Muslim knows the location of every other Muslim at all times even when they're in hiding.

Seriously, man, Al Qaeda was just in Afghanistan, it's not like the Taliban was hosting banquets for them. They were also just in Pakistan, and Pakistan didn't really know where they were at the beginning - though when we started acting like assholes and they found out where Osama was, surprise surprise, they didn't tell us. Yet we never went to war with Pakistan, and Pakistan isn't exactly a progressive western democracy either.

We didn't go to war with Pakistan, because we'd installed our own preferred government officials in Pakistan. We went to war with the Taliban in Afghanistan because we hadn't.



The Taliban could have and should have offered to help in the hunt if they did not know where Al Qaeda was. However I think they knew where the camps were and knew where Bin Laden was before the fighting started.

Pakistan is fucked up but there are parts of that government willing to work with us and that do not like having extremists in their country. Again they are feeding us information on targets for drone strikes.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 11, 2013 3:30 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
It's not even a leap. It's more like a small shuffle-step to the right.



Well, wake me when that happens.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.




Wakey, wakey, eggs and bakey...

http://now.msn.com/christopher-dorner-is-first-drone-target-on-us-soil

Quote:

It's official: The drone war has come home to America. Wanted fugitive Christopher Dorner, the homicidal former cop currently at war with the LAPD, has become the first known human target for airborne drones on U.S. soil. Their use was confirmed by Customs and Border Patrol spokesman Ralph DeSio, who revealed the government's fear that Dorner will make a dash for the Mexican border. The fugitive has already killed three people, according to police, and has a $1 million bounty on his head. Dorner, who has military training, is believed to be hiding in the wilderness of California's San Bernardino Mountains, where locating him without air support may be all but impossible.



So they are going to use drones to help find him. I like the way the articles uses terms like "target" when they are simply using the drones for air surveillance.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 11, 2013 4:57 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
Listen, we were expecting a bunch of backwards luddites with a hatred for western technology to not only be able to locate Al Qaeda in the difficult mountainous cave-ridden topography of northern Afghanistan and west Pakistan and turn them over to us, but we also just assumed they knew where Al Qaeda really was, because as we all know, every Muslim knows the location of every other Muslim at all times even when they're in hiding.

Seriously, man, Al Qaeda was just in Afghanistan, it's not like the Taliban was hosting banquets for them. They were also just in Pakistan, and Pakistan didn't really know where they were at the beginning - though when we started acting like assholes and they found out where Osama was, surprise surprise, they didn't tell us. Yet we never went to war with Pakistan, and Pakistan isn't exactly a progressive western democracy either.

We didn't go to war with Pakistan, because we'd installed our own preferred government officials in Pakistan. We went to war with the Taliban in Afghanistan because we hadn't.



The Taliban could have and should have offered to help in the hunt if they did not know where Al Qaeda was. However I think they knew where the camps were and knew where Bin Laden was before the fighting started.

Pakistan is fucked up but there are parts of that government willing to work with us and that do not like having extremists in their country. Again they are feeding us information on targets for drone strikes.



The Taliban did offer to help us find them. We refused because we assumed they were in cahoots even though it made no sense, the Taliban organized while Al Qaeda was still Mujahideen fighters... Both wanted power. Taliban came out ahead.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_%281978%E2%80%93presen
t%29


Quote:

The Taliban had initially emerged as a new force in the southern city of Kandahar conquering many southern and central provinces not under Islamic State control in the course of 1994. In early 1995, as they launched a major operation against the capital Kabul, they suffered a devastating defeat against the Islamic State forces of Massoud in what many analysts saw as the movement's end. By 1996, however, they had regrouped with massive military support by Pakistan and financial support by Saudi Arabia. In September 1996 they took power in Kabul and established the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. The United Islamic Front (Northern Alliance) was created under the leadership of Ahmad Shah Massoud as a military-political resistance force against the Taliban Emirate which was backed militarily by Pakistan's Army and enforced by several thousand Al Qaeda fighters from Arab countries and Central Asia.


Please know the history before tossing out stuff like you just said. You're speculating.

The Taliban did not know where Al Qaeda were and they weren't buddies, any more than the State of Utah could locate Butch Cassidy hiding out at hole in the wall and was in favour of him. Al Qaeda and the Taliban became allies when we (meaning George W. Bush) decided to lump them all together. We allied with the Northern Alliance who were Al Qaeda sympathizers to take down the Taliban and Al Qaeda, and when we managed to take down the Taliban we were surprised when suddenly no one could find Al Qaeda or track down Osama. It was the dumbest most politically unsavvy strategy I've ever seen - in fact it seems like at every turn there was some new sidetracked tangent to the operation that had nothing to do with the original objective, from the Taliban, to Iraq, and now Iran.

Now that the Taliban and Al Qaeda are allies due to necessity, we have Taliban sympathizers in the Pakistan government who mostly just pretend they want to help us. Ultimately we walked into Afghanistan without fully understanding the political situation and we made an enormous mess out of it. And the people feeding us drone strike information are both subtly trying to sabotage us and also under pressure from their own people to stop helping us. All this will come to a head.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 11, 2013 5:17 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


At least try and post something that supports what you are saying.

So the Taliban did not know where Al Qaeda was?

"In 2000, British Intelligence reported that the ISI was taking an active role in several Al Qaeda training camps.[85] The ISI helped with the construction of training camps for both the Taliban and Al Qaeda.[85][86][87] From 1996 to 2001 the Al Qaeda of Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri became a state within the Taliban state.[88] Bin Laden sent Arab and Central Asian Al-Qaeda militants to join the fight against the United Front among them his Brigade 055.[88][89]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban

"After the Sudanese made it clear, in May 1996, that bin Laden would never be welcome to return,[clarification needed] Taliban-controlled Afghanistan—with previously established connections between the groups, administered with a shared militancy,[110] and largely isolated from American political influence and military power—provided a perfect location for al-Qaeda to relocate its headquarters. Al-Qaeda enjoyed the Taliban's protection and a measure of legitimacy as part of their Ministry of Defense, although only Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates recognized the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.

While in Afghanistan, the Taliban government tasked al-Qaeda with the training of Brigade 055, an elite part of the Taliban's army from 1997–2001. The Brigade was made up of mostly foreign fighters, many veterans from the Soviet Invasion, and all under the same basic ideology of the mujahideen."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Qaeda

Now the Taliban made offers to turn Bin Laden over to a neutral country but only after the US provided evidence that he was involved in the 911 attacks. I guess Bin Laden and Al Qaeda taking credit fro them was not enough.


I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 11, 2013 5:32 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

"In 2000, British Intelligence reported that the ISI was taking an active role in several Al Qaeda training camps. [85] The ISI helped with the construction of training camps for both the Taliban and Al Qaeda. [85] [86] [87] From 1996 to 2001 the Al Qaeda of Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri became a state within the Taliban state. [88] Bin Laden sent Arab and Central Asian Al-Qaeda militants to join the fight against the United Front among them his Brigade 055. [88] [89]"


This doesn't support what you were saying either. It says the ISI separately established training camps for both Al Qaeda and the Taliban, not that they were the same group. And it's also true that Al Qaeda and the Taliban were opposed to each other through the 1990s.

Quote:

"After the Sudanese made it clear, in May 1996, that bin Laden would never be welcome to return, [clarification needed] Taliban-controlled Afghanistan—with previously established connections between the groups, administered with a shared militancy, [110] and largely isolated from American political influence and military power—provided a perfect location for al-Qaeda to relocate its headquarters. Al-Qaeda enjoyed the Taliban's protection and a measure of legitimacy as part of their Ministry of Defense, although only Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates recognized the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.

While in Afghanistan, the Taliban government tasked al-Qaeda with the training of Brigade 055, an elite part of the Taliban's army from 1997–2001. The Brigade was made up of mostly foreign fighters, many veterans from the Soviet Invasion, and all under the same basic ideology of the mujahideen."



This section only has one cite, posted after 9-11, which was written by a Times journalist seemingly as a justification for war with the Taliban. I can't confirm any sources from the Times article. The wikipedia section has also been written in a very leading manner.

In this wikipedia article, all of the cites are after 9-11.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/055_Brigade

I think you're seeing the white-washing of history in progress here Nick. You'd think if this were something that was known since 1997 there'd be mentions of it before 9-11.

In fact, further assessment of the cites on the articles are warranted after this observation.

Taliban article.

Quote:

Al Qaeda also supported the Taliban with regiments of imported fighters from Arab countries and Central Asia.[21][22][23]


cites

Quote:

^ "Afghanistan resistance leader feared dead in blast". London: Ahmed Rashid in the Telegraph. 2001-09-11.
^ Marcela Grad. Massoud: An Intimate Portrait of the Legendary Afghan Leader (March 1, 2009 ed.). Webster University Press. p. 310.
^ US attack on Taliban kills 23 in Pakistan, The New York Times, 2008-09-09



The first two cites are unrelated to the claim. The last cite is from 2008.

Quote:

In 2001 alone, according to several international sources, 28,000-30,000 Pakistani nationals, 14,000-15,000 Afghan Taliban and 2,000-3,000 Al Qaeda militants were fighting against anti-Taliban forces in Afghanistan as a roughly 45,000 strong military force.[21][22][76][77] Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf – then as Chief of Army Staff – was responsible for sending thousands of Pakistanis to fight alongside the Taliban and Bin Laden against the forces of Ahmad Shah Massoud.[22][58][78]


Again, 21 and 22 aren't related to a Taliban Al Qaeda connection. 58 is "Documents Detail Years of Pakistani Support for Taliban, Extremists". George Washington University. 2007." 76 is "Edward Girardet. Killing the Cranes: A Reporter's Journey Through Three Decades of War in Afghanistan (August 3, 2011 ed.). Chelsea Green Publishing. p. 416".

78 is "Inside the Taliban". National Geographic Society. 2007.

77 is a big one, wikipedia says that this was the book that a lot of the CIA and British Intelligence as well as George W. Bush and Tony Blair looked at after 9-11. Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, written 2000 (before 9-11!) by an Ahmed Rashid. It's actually cited twice by the wikipedia article, as both 77 and 249, as seen in "Bin Laden was able to forge an alliance between the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The Al Qaeda-trained 055 Brigade integrated with the Taliban army between 1997 and 2001."

Ahmed Rashid was a former revolutionary fighter in the Pakistan area who became disillusioned with fighting against military dictators that rose to power. In the book summary on the Yale university pages, I see only one allegation referring to Al Qaeda, in reference to changing attitudes towards the Taliban and recent bombing of Al-Qaeda hide-outs. I don't recall we were bombing northern Afghanistan before 9-11, so I can only presume that comes from an updated version that was published after 9-11.

The parts of the article you posted had cites 85-89.

Atkins, Stephen E. (2011). The 9/11 Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 540. ISBN 978-1-59884-921-9.
^ Litwak, Robert (2007). Regime change: U.S. strategy through the prism of 9/11. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 309. ISBN 978-0-8018-8642-3.
^ McGrath, Kevin (2011). Confronting Al-Qaeda. Naval Institute Press. p. 138. ISBN 978-1-59114-503-5. "the Pakistani military's Inter-services Intelligence Directorate (IsI) provided assistance to the taliban regime, to include its military and al Qaeda–related terrorist training camps"
^ a b "Book review: The inside track on Afghan wars by Khaled Ahmed". Daily Times. 2008.
^ "Brigade 055". CNN. unknown.[dead link]

You'll notice a similar problem with those cites.

Quote:

Taliban-Al-Qaeda connections were also strengthened by the reported marriage of one of bin Laden's sons to Omar's daughter. While in Afghanistan, bin Laden may have helped finance the Taliban.[250][251]


250: ^ International Terrorism And the Case Of Usama bin Laden, Lebanese Army Website[dead link]
251: ^ However, Lawrence Wright claims bin Laden was almost completely broke at this time, cut off from his family income and fleeced by the Sudanese.Wright 2006, pp. 222–223.

Why is there only one cite here that predates 9-11, and there's indications that source was updated to have an Al Qaeda Taliban link post 9-11? In addition to that the articles all have problems with weasel words, issues with article neutrality...

There is a clear contradiction in the wikipedia article covering the Afghanistan Civil War and articles on Al Qaeda and the Taliban. I can speculate why this might be - the Al Qaeda and the Taliban article are more likely to be read and there's more interest from certain agendas that those articles be written with a particular spin. However, my speculation would be as welcome as your speculation that the Taliban did know where Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden were.

In any case, I am not convinced by your argument or your sources.

And you still support predator drone attacks. :/ I'm not even sure how we got onto this particular argument, but the original argument was about your support of predator drones, and how the rest of the board except Jongstraw and AURaptor thinks your faith in predator drones is misplaced.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 11, 2013 6:30 AM

BYTEMITE

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 11, 2013 3:41 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
In any case, I am not convinced by your argument or your sources.



Of course not.

Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:And you still support predator drone attacks. :/ I'm not even sure how we got onto this particular argument, but the original argument was about your support of predator drones, and how the rest of the board except Jongstraw and AURaptor thinks your faith in predator drones is misplaced.


Yes. I think it is far worse to sit back and let groups like Al Qaeda and the Taliban work freely when we have the power to dispute and kill them.

I disagree with many on this board regarding other things as well.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 11, 2013 5:07 PM

BYTEMITE


Fair enough.

I suspect you might feel cornered and/or badgered, as we're focusing on you when there are others who feel the same way.

I'll never agree with you about the ethics of any of this, but I suppose we aren't making any ground either way here.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 12, 2023 5:52 AM

JAYNEZTOWN

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
With apologies to JSF: Favorite songs (3)
Fri, April 19, 2024 18:08 - 53 posts
President Meathead's Uncle Was Not Eaten By Cannibals
Fri, April 19, 2024 17:21 - 1 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, April 19, 2024 17:03 - 3535 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Fri, April 19, 2024 15:17 - 6268 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Fri, April 19, 2024 13:10 - 743 posts
Elections; 2024
Fri, April 19, 2024 10:01 - 2274 posts
BREAKING NEWS: Taylor Swift has a lot of ex-boyfriends
Fri, April 19, 2024 09:18 - 1 posts
This is what baseball bats are for, not to mention you're the one in a car...
Thu, April 18, 2024 23:38 - 1 posts
FACTS
Thu, April 18, 2024 19:48 - 548 posts
Biden's a winner, Trumps a loser. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Thu, April 18, 2024 18:38 - 148 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Thu, April 18, 2024 17:58 - 777 posts
Why does THUGR shit up the board by bumping his pointless threads?
Thu, April 18, 2024 12:38 - 9 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL