REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Race relations have plummeted since Obama took office

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 09:59
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3053
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:52 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Public attitudes about race relations have plummeted since the historic election of President Barack Obama, according to a new poll from NBC News and the Wall Street Journal.

Only 52 percent of whites and 38 percent of blacks have a favorable opinion of race relations in the country, according to the poll, which has tracked race relations since 1994 and was conducted in mid-July by Hart Research Associations and Public Opinion Strategies.

That’s a sharp drop from the beginning of Obama’s first term, when 79 percent of whites and 63 percent of blacks held a favorable view of American race relations.



http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/25/race-relations-have-plummeted-since-
obama-took-office-according-to-poll
/

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:31 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!




Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:44 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Obama has used Saul Alinksy's "Rules For Radicals" as his bible and blueprint for destroying America since day one. Five years later, he's giving speeches that are racially divisive. And he's still out there campaigning instead of leading, blaming Republicans every day for his own staggering failures.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:34 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


And since Obama took office the right-wing media has gone into overdrive on stories with a racial theme.

Do you think the two could be related?

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:53 PM

REAVERFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Obama has used Saul Alinksy's "Rules For Radicals" as his bible and blueprint for destroying America since day one. Five years later, he's giving speeches that are racially divisive. And he's still out there campaigning instead of leading, blaming Republicans every day for his own staggering failures.

I know that's what your sources TELL you, but it's not true. Reichwing "news" is not really news.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 25, 2013 3:14 PM

MAL4PREZ


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Obama has used Saul Alinksy's "Rules For Radicals" as his bible and blueprint for destroying America since day one. Five years later, he's giving speeches that are racially divisive. And he's still out there campaigning instead of leading, blaming Republicans every day for his own staggering failures.


Wow Jongs. You continue down the road to complete right-wing biased batshit crazy. And you ain't walkin'. You're at a full sprint.

The US of 2013 kicks the ass of the US of 2008. Certainly problems persist, but the improvement is beyond obvious. So go on, surprise me. Explain exactly how O is destroying America. Be sure to include that part where O's jackboots knocked down your door and took all your guns, and then how he brought in Sharia law, being a closet African Muslim America-hating terrorist and all.

**blinks eyes and waits expectantly**

*---------------------------------------*
The French Revolution would have never happened if Marie Antoinette had just given every peasant an iPhone.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 25, 2013 4:01 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
And since Obama took office the right-wing media has gone into overdrive on stories with a racial theme.

Do you think the two could be related?



So what do you consider "the right-wing media"?

Do you think that the "right-wing media" has such an influence on Black Americans that their favorable view of race relations had dropped for 63% to 38% since the beginning of Pres. Obama's first term?


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 25, 2013 4:04 PM

MAL4PREZ


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
And since Obama took office the right-wing media has gone into overdrive on stories with a racial theme.

Do you think the two could be related?



So what do you consider "the right-wing media"?

Do you think that the "right-wing media" has such an influence on Black Americans that their favorable view of race relations had dropped for 63% to 38% since the beginning of Pres. Obama's first term?



You think black Americans are too ignorant to see the difference between how outlets like Faux news treated W and how they've treated O?

*---------------------------------------*
The French Revolution would have never happened if Marie Antoinette had just given every peasant an iPhone.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 25, 2013 4:23 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
And since Obama took office the right-wing media has gone into overdrive on stories with a racial theme.

Do you think the two could be related?

It's not personal. It's just war.



merely reporting the facts is hardly ' over drive '.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 25, 2013 4:24 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by MAL4PREZ:
Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
And since Obama took office the right-wing media has gone into overdrive on stories with a racial theme.

Do you think the two could be related?



So what do you consider "the right-wing media"?

Do you think that the "right-wing media" has such an influence on Black Americans that their favorable view of race relations had dropped for 63% to 38% since the beginning of Pres. Obama's first term?



You think black Americans are too ignorant to see the difference between how outlets like Faux news treated W and how they've treated O?



Well, for starters, they're different Presidents, doing different things. So yes, they'd be treated differently.


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 25, 2013 4:26 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by MAL4PREZ: Certainly problems persist, but the improvement is beyond obvious. So go on, surprise me. Explain exactly how O is destroying America. Be sure to include that part where O's jackboots knocked down your door and took all your guns, and then how he brought in Sharia law, being a closet African Muslim America-hating terrorist and all.




Race relations aren't better.

Most ever Americans on food stamps too. That's not better.

But Gitmo is still open, so that's a good thing, at least.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 3:17 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
And since Obama took office the right-wing media has gone into overdrive on stories with a racial theme.

Do you think the two could be related?

It's not personal. It's just war.



merely reporting the facts is hardly ' over drive '.




Their choice of which facts to report, and how to spin them, is.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 3:26 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
And since Obama took office the right-wing media has gone into overdrive on stories with a racial theme.

Do you think the two could be related?



So what do you consider "the right-wing media"?

Do you think that the "right-wing media" has such an influence on Black Americans that their favorable view of race relations had dropped for 63% to 38% since the beginning of Pres. Obama's first term?


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."



I think the extent of the fierce, crazed, irrational hostility and resistance towards the nation's first black president has not gone unnoticed by the black community. This and the recent Zimmerman verdict is ample explanation for me.

What do you think? Has Obama done much to turn black people against white people, or vice-versa? If so what exactly has he done?

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 3:55 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
So what do you consider "the right-wing media"?

Do you think that the "right-wing media" has such an influence on Black Americans that their favorable view of race relations had dropped for 63% to 38% since the beginning of Pres. Obama's first term?



I think the extent of the fierce, crazed, irrational hostility and resistance towards the nation's first black president has not gone unnoticed by the black community. This and the recent Zimmerman verdict is ample explanation for me.



And once again, who is the "right-wing media"? Fox News? Do ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, etc. exhibit "...fierce, crazed, irrational hostility and resistance towards the nation's first black president..."? How many Black people watch Fox News anyway?

Quote:

What do you think? Has Obama done much to turn black people against white people, or vice-versa? If so what exactly has he done?



From commentaries I've seen, I think that many Black people supported and voted for Pres. Obama expecting him to spend more time on improving their lot, and are disturbed when he instead bails out big corporations and gets involved in conflicts overseas.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 4:09 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

And once again, who is the "right-wing media"? Fox News?

Yes... You know who the right-wing media are. I never made the point that black people have been influenced by the right-wing media. No, right-wing people have, mostly white, and the resulting hostility generated towards Obama has been noticed by black people. Hence, black people say race relations are worse.

Quote:

Quote:
What do you think? Has Obama done much to turn black people against white people, or vice-versa? If so what exactly has he done?


From commentaries I've seen, I think that many Black people supported and voted for Pres. Obama expecting him to spend more time on improving their lot, and are disturbed when he instead bails out big corporations and gets involved in conflicts overseas.


You studiously avoided my question there, and answered a different one. Has Obama done much to turn black people against white people, or vice-versa? If so what exactly has he done?

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 4:27 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

And once again, who is the "right-wing media"? Fox News?

Yes... You know who the right-wing media are.



Not really. Don't watch cable or network news much. Just interested to see who YOU think "right-wing media" are.


Quote:

I never made the point that black people have been influenced by the right-wing media. No, right-wing people have, mostly white, and the resulting hostility generated towards Obama has been noticed by black people. Hence, black people say race relations are worse.


But since enough white people supported Obama to get him elected to a second term, wouldn't that support counteract the hostility, which is -after all - as much Democrat/Republican as anything else?

Then again, how would this account for the decrease in whites with a favorable opinion of race relations?

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:
What do you think? Has Obama done much to turn black people against white people, or vice-versa? If so what exactly has he done?


From commentaries I've seen, I think that many Black people supported and voted for Pres. Obama expecting him to spend more time on improving their lot, and are disturbed when he instead bails out big corporations and gets involved in conflicts overseas.


You studiously avoided my question there, and answered a different one. Has Obama done much to turn black people against white people, or vice-versa? If so what exactly has he done?



That's because your question has nothing to do with people's opinions of improvements or failures in race relations. It's a "Have you stopped beating your wife?"


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 5:15 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Can't help but notice how the poll #'s are NOT being discussed here. NBC / WSJ are such right wing strong holds...


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 11:28 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

But since enough white people supported Obama to get him elected to a second term, wouldn't that support counteract the hostility

No. How would it? If the right-wing media and GOP leaders want to stir up their base against Obama, what can white liberals do about it?

Quote:

Then again, how would this account for the decrease in whites with a favorable opinion of race relations?

The right-wing media playing lots of racially charged stories to its largely white audience - you're confused over how this contributes negatively to perceptions of race relations?

Quote:

"You studiously avoided my question there, and answered a different one."

That's because your question has nothing to do with people's opinions of improvements or failures in race relations. It's a "Have you stopped beating your wife?"



Huh? Look at the title of the thread. I asked you (in your opinion), "Has Obama done much to turn black people against white people, or vice-versa?" You don't want to answer it, that's fine. But it's not an unfair question. Maybe think about why you can't answer it.

Quote:

Just interested to see who YOU think "right-wing media" are.

Well I don't see how this question is pertinent to the thread if mine wasn't, but: Fox news, Rush Limbaugh, Breitbart etc. is what I had in mind as right-wing media. I don't know what answer you were hoping for here.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 11:31 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Can't help but notice how the poll #'s are NOT being discussed here. NBC / WSJ are such right wing strong holds...



Poll-denialism is the province of the right Rap. Did you learn nothing from the predictions thread? :-)

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 11:38 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Can't help but notice how the poll #'s are NOT being discussed here. NBC / WSJ are such right wing strong holds...



Poll-denialism is the province of the right Rap. Did you learn nothing from the predictions thread? :-)

It's not personal. It's just war.



Nice dodge.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 11:39 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Dodge of what?

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 1:09 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
And since Obama took office the right-wing media has gone into overdrive on stories with a racial theme.

Do you think the two could be related?

It's not personal. It's just war.



You're asking for too much critical thought, there.

Maybe they thought all the racist emails, the effigies, the coded language... were somehow going to go unnoticed.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 1:11 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Can't help but notice how the poll #'s are NOT being discussed here.



What, you expecting us to deny the numbers? Nah, that's the right's thing.

We know race relations are bad - you and your fellow fucktards on the right are the ones who've been saying race is no longer an issue.

So, the grown ups are more interested in discussing the *whys* of the situation, rather than dwelling on numbers telling us what we already knew.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 4:47 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:

What, you expecting us to deny the numbers? Nah, that's the right's thing.



No, we only reject doctored, phony numbers.

Quote:



We know race relations are bad - you and your fellow fucktards on the right are the ones who've been saying race is no longer an issue.



It really never has been. But the race merchants on the Left keep fanning the flames of hate and division, by interjecting "race" into every damn thing. The fucktard, is you, my friend.

Quote:



So, the grown ups are more interested in discussing the *whys* of the situation, rather than dwelling on numbers telling us what we already knew.



Yes. I am.

Hold up...telling you what you already KNEW ? That relations under Obama have gotten drastically WORSE ?

Really? You KNEW that ?

That's funny.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 5:15 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Maybe they thought all the racist emails, the effigies, the coded language... were somehow going to go unnoticed.


Maybe they assume we're as stupid and gullible as they are.

Means they won't see it coming.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 5:24 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Maybe they thought all the racist emails, the effigies, the coded language... were somehow going to go unnoticed.


Maybe they assume we're as stupid and gullible as they are.

Means they won't see it coming.

-F



IT ?

What a silly imagination you have.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 26, 2013 10:27 PM

FREMDFIRMA


*snicker*

If my intentions ain't clear by now, yer even dumber than advertised, and that... is a damn sad thing.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 27, 2013 12:34 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
*snicker*

If my intentions ain't clear by now, yer even dumber than advertised, and that... is a damn sad thing.

-F



Do I care ? Am I caring about your delusional views ?


Not so much.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 27, 2013 4:37 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Maybe they thought all the racist emails, the effigies, the coded language... were somehow going to go unnoticed.


Maybe they assume we're as stupid and gullible as they are.



-F



Goes without saying. Look who we're talking to, after all.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 29, 2013 3:51 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

But since enough white people supported Obama to get him elected to a second term, wouldn't that support counteract the hostility

No. How would it? If the right-wing media and GOP leaders want to stir up their base against Obama, what can white liberals do about it?



As long as they believe that the only thing that affects race relations in this country is the "right-wing media", they can apparently do nothing.

Quote:

The right-wing media playing lots of racially charged stories to its largely white audience - you're confused over how this contributes negatively to perceptions of race relations?


No. I'm confused by your belief that the "right-wing media" have so much power that there need be no other reason for negative perceptions of race relations.

Quote:

Huh? Look at the title of the thread. I asked you (in your opinion), "Has Obama done much to turn black people against white people, or vice-versa?" You don't want to answer it, that's fine. But it's not an unfair question. Maybe think about why you can't answer it.


As noted above, I think that you're missing the issue here relating to the president. It isn't whether Pres. Obama is turning Blacks against whites, but whether he is meeting the expectations - placed on him by many of the black and white people who voted for him - that he would take positive steps to improve race relations and the conditions of minorities. I've seen plenty of editorials and comments by Blacks and white Liberals who are disillusioned by his lack of movement in this direction.

You might also consider that the non-"right-wing media" coverage of the Martin/Zimmerman story didn't really help reduce racial tensions.

Quote:

Well I don't see how this question is pertinent to the thread if mine wasn't, but: Fox news, Rush Limbaugh, Breitbart etc. is what I had in mind as right-wing media. I don't know what answer you were hoping for here.



You were blaiming the "right-wing media". I just wondered what that covered. Some folks here consider the NY Times and Washington Pose "right-wing media".


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 29, 2013 4:07 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

As long as they believe that the only thing that affects race relations in this country is the "right-wing media"

I never said that. I made the point that the right, if it chooses to, can sour race relations all by themselves. And that they have indeed chosen to.

Quote:

You might also consider that the non-"right-wing media" coverage of the Martin/Zimmerman story didn't really help reduce racial tensions.

I already mentioned the Martin/Zimmerman case as part of the explanation for these numbers.

Quote:

No. I'm confused by your belief that the "right-wing media" have so much power that there need be no other reason for negative perceptions of race relations.

In other words, you're unhappy that I'm giving Obama 'a pass' on this. Even though when I ask you for specifics of what the president has done to contribute to the problem, you can't answer. Yes Geezer, the right-wing can rock the boat all by itself. There's nothing confusing about it.

Quote:

I think that you're missing the issue here relating to the president. It isn't whether Pres. Obama is turning Blacks against whites, but whether he is meeting the expectations - placed on him by many of the black and white people who voted for him - that he would take positive steps to improve race relations and the conditions of minorities

What does this have to do with race relations? Finish your line of reasoning. Expectations of Obama improving the lot of minorities are not met. So what? Do black people consequently get angry at white people? Because they've been disappointed by Obama?? Let's suppose Obama had really made an effort to enact policies with disproportionate economic benefit for minorities. Do you think THAT would have improved race relations?

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 30, 2013 2:45 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

As long as they believe that the only thing that affects race relations in this country is the "right-wing media"

I never said that. I made the point that the right, if it chooses to, can sour race relations all by themselves. And that they have indeed chosen to.



So aren't you saying that the "right" has control of race relations? That there's nothing folks in the center or left can do to improve them? You sure haven't suggested anything.

Quote:

Quote:

You might also consider that the non-"right-wing media" coverage of the Martin/Zimmerman story didn't really help reduce racial tensions.

I already mentioned the Martin/Zimmerman case as part of the explanation for these numbers.



SO it's not just the "right-wing media" causing the problem after all?

Quote:

Quote:

No. I'm confused by your belief that the "right-wing media" have so much power that there need be no other reason for negative perceptions of race relations.

In other words, you're unhappy that I'm giving Obama 'a pass' on this. Even though when I ask you for specifics of what the president has done to contribute to the problem, you can't answer. Yes Geezer, the right-wing can rock the boat all by itself. There's nothing confusing about it.



I'm unhappy that you stick your head in the "It's all the right-wing medias fault, and there's nothing we can do" sand. As noted, there are a lot of liberals who are unhappy with the President's lack of action on improving conditions for minorities:
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/09/18/obama-fails-to-address-black-am
ericas-disappointments-with-his-presidency-2
/
http://uptownmagazine.com/2013/07/obama-fails-black-america-and-trayvo
n
/
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2010-01-18/news/36901819_1_race-rel
ations-president-obama-blacks


Quote:

Quote:

I think that you're missing the issue here relating to the president. It isn't whether Pres. Obama is turning Blacks against whites, but whether he is meeting the expectations - placed on him by many of the black and white people who voted for him - that he would take positive steps to improve race relations and the conditions of minorities

What does this have to do with race relations? Finish your line of reasoning. Expectations of Obama improving the lot of minorities are not met. So what? Do black people consequently get angry at white people? Because they've been disappointed by Obama?? Let's suppose Obama had really made an effort to enact policies with disproportionate economic benefit for minorities. Do you think THAT would have improved race relations?



My line of reasoning is that folks expected Pres. Obama to make a substantial push for improvement in both race relations and the condition of minorities. Since he hasn't, folks are disappointed and feel that the President doesn't care, or doesn't consider it a high priority. They feel that no expected improvement equals a worsening in conditions.

I'm not saying that this is the entire reason for a worsening in race relations - that'd be as silly as blaming it all on the "right-wing media" - but I believe that the president's lack of action, along with the economic downturn hitting minorities worse, the inflamatory Trayvon Martin coverage, and other factors, has contributed to the problem.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 30, 2013 1:34 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

So aren't you saying that the "right" has control of race relations?

No, you imagined that. Back to the boat analogy. Three people in a boat: Left, Right, and Centre. It only takes one of them to rock the boat. The other two can try to keep it steady, but they won't be able to stop it rocking completely. But this doesn't mean that the person rocking the boat is 'in control' of the boat. Understood?

Quote:

That there's nothing folks in the center or left can do to improve them? You sure haven't suggested anything.

I just can't figure out where you're even coming from here. I'm blaming the right for rocking the boat; you're accusing me of going easy on the left and the centre for failing to hold it steady... The lengths you go to excuse and ignore and equivocate away the wrongdoings of the right is truly mindblowing. Truly.

Quote:

I'm unhappy that you stick your head in the "It's all the right-wing medias fault, and there's nothing we can do" sand

Let's be clear - I never said my side does nothing to combat the racial discord. Look at the recent racially-charged thread started by Jongs about a gang of black teens in Baltimore (and joined in by Auraptor, a few days after he started this thread). An example of how the right-wing media's influence reaches us all: these two get stoked up by it, and spread its message here. Now in this thread (and all the other racially divisive threads these guys have started since Obama came to power), who are the people that take them on? Who are the people arguing to look past skin colour? Is it their fellow conservatives? Is it 'centrists' like yourself? No, it's people on the left. You ASSUME because race relations have got worse that the left in general and Obama specifically has not been trying hard to counteract it. You're wrong.

Quote:

SO it's not just the "right-wing media" causing the problem after all?

Right from the beginning of this discussion I have listed two main factors for worsened race relations, the right-wing media over the past several years, and the Zimmerman verdict more recently.

Quote:

I'm not saying that this is the entire reason for a worsening in race relations

What you are saying, so far, doesn't make any sense. Race relations is to do with the relations between different races. You are talking about black people being sore at Pres. Obama - and calling that 'bad race relations'. Please follow your line of reasoning to a point where it MAKES SENSE. How does poor/unimproved economic conditions for minorities, and black people being upset with Obama, translate to bad relations between white folk and black folk etc.?

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 30, 2013 1:48 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


An extra thing to note, from the article:

Quote:

Only 52 percent of whites and 38 percent of blacks have a favorable opinion of race relations in the country, according to the poll, which has tracked race relations since 1994 and was conducted in mid-July by Hart Research Associations and Public Opinion Strategies.

That’s a sharp drop from the beginning of Obama’s first term, when 79 percent of whites and 63 percent of blacks held a favorable view of American race relations.



The sharp drop is measured from the start of Obama's first term and the boost in perceived race relations that accompanied it. Looking at the data for now compared with 2007, there's not much difference. 2008 and 2011, race relations were markedly better than 2007. Take away the Martin/Zimmerman case and I think we'd be looking at improved race relations under Obama in 2013 as well.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, July 31, 2013 2:36 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

So aren't you saying that the "right" has control of race relations?

No, you imagined that. Back to the boat analogy. Three people in a boat: Left, Right, and Centre. It only takes one of them to rock the boat. The other two can try to keep it steady, but they won't be able to stop it rocking completely. But this doesn't mean that the person rocking the boat is 'in control' of the boat. Understood?



So you're back to faltering race relations being solely due to "right-wing media"?

Quote:

Quote:

That there's nothing folks in the center or left can do to improve them? You sure haven't suggested anything.

I just can't figure out where you're even coming from here. I'm blaming the right for rocking the boat; you're accusing me of going easy on the left and the centre for failing to hold it steady... The lengths you go to excuse and ignore and equivocate away the wrongdoings of the right is truly mindblowing. Truly.



I'm noting that you seem to think that the left and center have nothing to do with shaping opinions on race relations either way, just the right for "rocking the boat."


Quote:

Quote:

I'm unhappy that you stick your head in the "It's all the right-wing medias fault, and there's nothing we can do" sand

Let's be clear - I never said my side does nothing to combat the racial discord. Look at the recent racially-charged thread started by Jongs about a gang of black teens in Baltimore (and joined in by Auraptor, a few days after he started this thread). An example of how the right-wing media's influence reaches us all:



Jongs cited an article from the local CBS affiliate. So is CBS "right-wing media" now?


Quote:

Quote:

SO it's not just the "right-wing media" causing the problem after all?

Right from the beginning of this discussion I have listed two main factors for worsened race relations, the right-wing media over the past several years, and the Zimmerman verdict more recently.



So how about the non-"right-wing media" playing up the racial aspects of the Zimmerman case incessantly? Think that had anything to do with worsened race relations.

Quote:

Quote:

I'm not saying that this is the entire reason for a worsening in race relations

What you are saying, so far, doesn't make any sense. Race relations is to do with the relations between different races. You are talking about black people being sore at Pres. Obama - and calling that 'bad race relations'. Please follow your line of reasoning to a point where it MAKES SENSE. How does poor/unimproved economic conditions for minorities, and black people being upset with Obama, translate to bad relations between white folk and black folk etc.?



It's all about perception. If black people expected that blacks would gain some benefit from the Obama presidency, and they see that Pres. Obama is not working as hard as they expected, they're going to wonder why. They then look at who has gained benefit from Pres. Obama, and they see corporations and businesses run mostly by, guess who, rich white guys. Obviously, they're not gonna love the rich white guys, and will sour somewhat on white guys in general.

Liberal whites, who see this, are gonna realize that race relations are taking a hit.

Seems pretty straightforward.

If you expect that the only thing that affects race relations is folks screaming "Lynch the coons" or "Get Whitey", that seems sort of one-dimensional to me.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 2, 2013 11:42 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

So you're back to faltering race relations being solely due to "right-wing media"?

No, the boat analogy was to explain to you how one side can theoretically be responsible for worsening race relations without necessarily being 'in charge' of them. Having said that, remove the Zimmerman case from the picture and yes, that is pretty much how I see things - elements within the right rocking the boat, and people in the left and centre trying to hold it steady.

Quote:

I'm noting that you seem to think that the left and center have nothing to do with shaping opinions on race relations either way,

No, as I said, people in the left and centre are trying to hold the boat steady.

Quote:

Jongs cited an article from the local CBS affiliate. So is CBS "right-wing media" now?

The article was local news as you said - local to Baltimore. Last I remember Jongs is a resident of Florida. So who's betting she was directed to that story and inspired to post it here by some right-wing website? So again, thank you right-wing media.

Quote:

So how about the non-"right-wing media" playing up the racial aspects of the Zimmerman case incessantly?

Black people were always going to perceive 'racial aspects' to this case - a light-skinned man profiling and following a black teen walking home, an ensuing confrontation and the black teen shot dead, and the light-skinned shooter released by police on the spot. A community that has a long history of not being served by the US justice system was, as I say, always going to perceive 'racial aspects'. I don't see how the media could've ignored that.

Quote:

They then look at who has gained benefit from Pres. Obama, and they see corporations and businesses run mostly by, guess who, rich white guys. Obviously, they're not gonna love the rich white guys, and will sour somewhat on white guys in general.

Liberal whites, who see this, are gonna realize that race relations are taking a hit.

Seems pretty straightforward.


It seems pretty straightforward to me that to the extent that black people are angry and dissatisfied with the president (a black man) - as you insist that they are - they can't then be blaming 'whitey' for keeping them down. If Obama were white, then I think this would be much more of a problem. I would say this is one area where Obama has undoubtedly improved race relations.

Quote:

If you expect that the only thing that affects race relations is folks screaming "Lynch the coons" or "Get Whitey", that seems sort of one-dimensional to me.

Would that all right-wing efforts at racial divisiveness were this transparently racist. But as you know, they're not.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 2, 2013 2:05 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Something I read this week that relates:

http://m.news24.com/news24/World/News/US-minorities-more-optimistic-th
an-whites-20130801-2


It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 2, 2013 5:01 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

So you're back to faltering race relations being solely due to "right-wing media"?

No, the boat analogy was to explain to you how one side can theoretically be responsible for worsening race relations without necessarily being 'in charge' of them. Having said that, remove the Zimmerman case from the picture and yes, that is pretty much how I see things - elements within the right rocking the boat, and people in the left and centre trying to hold it steady.


So it's pretty much the same to you. Only the Right is responsible for the lessening of good race relations.

Quote:

Quote:

I'm noting that you seem to think that the left and center have nothing to do with shaping opinions on race relations either way,

No, as I said, people in the left and centre are trying to hold the boat steady.

And there have been no actions by the Left that have soured race relations?

Quote:

Quote:

Jongs cited an article from the local CBS affiliate. So is CBS "right-wing media" now?

The article was local news as you said - local to Baltimore. Last I remember Jongs is a resident of Florida. So who's betting she was directed to that story and inspired to post it here by some right-wing website? So again, thank you right-wing media.


Quite an assumption. I get most of my national and world news from BBC, AP, the Washington Post, and my local (Washington, D.C.) NBC news (not my idea of right-wing sources), but they have links to such stories. Who's to say where Jongs gets his/her information? Oh. That'd be you.

BTW, where are you located?

Quote:

Quote:

So how about the non-"right-wing media" playing up the racial aspects of the Zimmerman case incessantly?

Black people were always going to perceive 'racial aspects' to this case - a light-skinned man profiling and following a black teen walking home, an ensuing confrontation and the black teen shot dead, and the light-skinned shooter released by police on the spot. A community that has a long history of not being served by the US justice system was, as I say, always going to perceive 'racial aspects'. I don't see how the media could've ignored that.



You don't think that they emphasized it quite a bit? That they pushed the racial aspect to pretty much the exclusion of everything else? That they made it the whole "story"?

Quote:

Quote:

They then look at who has gained benefit from Pres. Obama, and they see corporations and businesses run mostly by, guess who, rich white guys. Obviously, they're not gonna love the rich white guys, and will sour somewhat on white guys in general.

Liberal whites, who see this, are gonna realize that race relations are taking a hit.

Seems pretty straightforward.


It seems pretty straightforward to me that to the extent that black people are angry and dissatisfied with the president (a black man) - as you insist that they are - they can't then be blaming 'whitey' for keeping them down. If Obama were white, then I think this would be much more of a problem. I would say this is one area where Obama has undoubtedly improved race relations.


So the fact that they might see Pres. Obama cooperating with rich white folks to bail those rich white folks out, while leaving black folks in poverty, wouldn't cause black folks to have a lower opinion of those white folks - and white folks in general?

Quote:

Quote:

If you expect that the only thing that affects race relations is folks screaming "Lynch the coons" or "Get Whitey", that seems sort of one-dimensional to me.

Would that all right-wing efforts at racial divisiveness were this transparently racist. But as you know, they're not.



Would that all left-wing failures to address racial divisiveness were as apparent to you. Apparently, they're not.

"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 3, 2013 6:30 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


Your posting of this "stat" is curious to me. I'm not sure what you're trying to infer by it. Is it that, because of President Obama, who gets blamed for everything negative happening in this country, including bad elementary school lunches, is to blame for the recent "plummet" in race relations figures?

I'm kind of new at this, please elaborate..........


The ever curious SGG


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Public attitudes about race relations have plummeted since the historic election of President Barack Obama, according to a new poll from NBC News and the Wall Street Journal.

Only 52 percent of whites and 38 percent of blacks have a favorable opinion of race relations in the country, according to the poll, which has tracked race relations since 1994 and was conducted in mid-July by Hart Research Associations and Public Opinion Strategies.

That’s a sharp drop from the beginning of Obama’s first term, when 79 percent of whites and 63 percent of blacks held a favorable view of American race relations.



http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/25/race-relations-have-plummeted-since-
obama-took-office-according-to-poll/


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 3, 2013 6:32 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


Really! Racially devisive!? How so?


SGG

Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Obama has used Saul Alinksy's "Rules For Radicals" as his bible and blueprint for destroying America since day one. Five years later, he's giving speeches that are racially divisive. And he's still out there campaigning instead of leading, blaming Republicans every day for his own staggering failures.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 4, 2013 3:29 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Your posting of this "stat" is curious to me. I'm not sure what you're trying to infer by it. Is it that, because of President Obama, who gets blamed for everything negative happening in this country, including bad elementary school lunches, is to blame for the recent "plummet" in race relations figures?

I'm kind of new at this, please elaborate..........


The ever curious SGG



I didn't write the article or do the survey, just posted the story here.

Funny you should mention school lunches, too. That's more Michelle's handiwork.





Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 4, 2013 6:42 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

And there have been no actions by the Left that have soured race relations?

Examples? I maintain on the whole that the left is a stabilising influence. Just as on the right I'm sure there are many who work towards good race relations, but there are also plenty of destabilisers, and these have the biggest impact.

Quote:

Who's to say where Jongs gets his/her information? Oh. That'd be you.

Calm down. I said 'who's betting'. If I was wording more carefully I would've followed with 'in which case' or somesuch. I'm still betting.

Quote:

You don't think that they emphasized it quite a bit? That they pushed the racial aspect to pretty much the exclusion of everything else? That they made it the whole "story"?

Perhaps some did, I don't know. I followed CNN somewhat and I thought they were quite measured. As I say, black people were angry just at the initial facts of the case that I described. And let's remember that it's in the media's interest to hype up a story. Ratings, competition, the free market - you're not complaining about that surely?

Quote:

So the fact that they might see Pres. Obama cooperating with rich white folks to bail those rich white folks out, while leaving black folks in poverty, wouldn't cause black folks to have a lower opinion of those white folks - and white folks in general?

As opposed to... a white president cooperating with rich white folks to bail rich white folks out? Black people could stomach that better? While being correct about some points Geezer, that an economic downturn hits minority communities hardest, that disparity of incomes can breed racial resentment - you haven't made any sense in explaining is how Obama being president has exacerbated any of these things. Let me ask you for your suggestions: specifically, what could Obama have done to improve race relations?

Quote:

Would that all left-wing failures to address racial divisiveness were as apparent to you. Apparently, they're not.

You crack me up, this is such classic Geezer. You accused me (wrongly) earlier of thinking the right is in total control of race relations. Apparently YOU think the left is in total control of race relations, that they can neutralise every divisive thing the right-wing media spews out? Out of interest, what specific failures are you thinking of?

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 5, 2013 2:36 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

And there have been no actions by the Left that have soured race relations?

Examples? I maintain on the whole that the left is a stabilising influence. Just as on the right I'm sure there are many who work towards good race relations, but there are also plenty of destabilisers, and these have the biggest impact.



Right here.

http://www.dentonrc.com/opinion/columns-headlines/20120512-walter-e.-w
illiams-liberals-use-blacks-to-further-own-agenda.ece


Quote:

Quote:

You don't think that they emphasized it quite a bit? That they pushed the racial aspect to pretty much the exclusion of everything else? That they made it the whole "story"?

Perhaps some did, I don't know. I followed CNN somewhat and I thought they were quite measured. As I say, black people were angry just at the initial facts of the case that I described. And let's remember that it's in the media's interest to hype up a story. Ratings, competition, the free market - you're not complaining about that surely?


Seems to me it was pretty much pushed as a racial thing. Stuff like NBC modifying the tape of Zimmerman's 911 call to make it sound more racist come to mind.

Quote:

Quote:

So the fact that they might see Pres. Obama cooperating with rich white folks to bail those rich white folks out, while leaving black folks in poverty, wouldn't cause black folks to have a lower opinion of those white folks - and white folks in general?

As opposed to... a white president cooperating with rich white folks to bail rich white folks out? Black people could stomach that better?



I believe it's because Blacks and white liberals had higher expectations of Pres. Obama working to improve the lot of minorities than they would a white president. When he didn't meet those expectations, while helping out the rich white folks, the disappointment was greater.


Quote:

While being correct about some points Geezer, that an economic downturn hits minority communities hardest, that disparity of incomes can breed racial resentment - you haven't made any sense in explaining is how Obama being president has exacerbated any of these things. Let me ask you for your suggestions: specifically, what could Obama have done to improve race relations?


Here's an article on what African-Americans expected from Obama.

http://www.newafricanmagazine.com/features/diaspora/african-americans-
expect-more-from-obama


Quote:

Would that all left-wing failures to address racial divisiveness were as apparent to you. Apparently, they're not.

You crack me up, this is such classic Geezer. You accused me (wrongly) earlier of thinking the right is in total control of race relations. Apparently YOU think the left is in total control of race relations, that they can neutralise every divisive thing the right-wing media spews out? Out of interest, what specific failures are you thinking of?

It's not personal. It's just war.



"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 6, 2013 2:43 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Black conservatives are accepted more by the TEA party crowd than the naacp. Far more.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 6, 2013 7:35 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Right here.

http://www.dentonrc.com/opinion/columns-headlines/20120512-walter-e.-w
illiams-liberals-use-blacks-to-further-own-agenda.ece



A pretty weak opinion piece if you ask me, and the fact that it comes out firing with racist Democrat quotes from the 1940s and 50s seems to bolster my point that left wing racial divisiveness is rare. It goes on to talk about NBC - is that a liberal news network now? And examples of MSNBC hosts calling the GOP racist - which to a significant extent is true... I didn't read much more.

Quote:

Seems to me it was pretty much pushed as a racial thing. Stuff like NBC modifying the tape of Zimmerman's 911 call to make it sound more racist come to mind.

That's one incident, are you treating that as representative of the whole media coverage?

Quote:

I believe it's because Blacks and white liberals had higher expectations of Pres. Obama working to improve the lot of minorities than they would a white president. When he didn't meet those expectations, while helping out the rich white folks, the disappointment was greater.

I think you view the black community as like an angry bear, that when it loses its temper invariably rages against white people. When a rock falls in its head, it rages against white people. When it gets stung by a bee, it rages against white people. When a black president disappoints it, it rages against white people.

Quote:

Here's an article on what African-Americans expected from Obama.

That wasn't what I asked. I asked how could Obama have improved race relations. Do you seriously think if Obama had followed the advice of the writer of that article, and worked primarily towards the advancement of black people in the US and in Africa, then that would have improved race relations in the US?

If not, answer the original question.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 6, 2013 9:47 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Black conservatives are accepted more by the TEA party crowd than the naacp. Far more.



The TEA parties need their token Black guys.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:58 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

Right here.

http://www.dentonrc.com/opinion/columns-headlines/20120512-walter-e.-w
illiams-liberals-use-blacks-to-further-own-agenda.ece



A pretty weak opinion piece if you ask me, and the fact that it comes out firing with racist Democrat quotes from the 1940s and 50s seems to bolster my point that left wing racial divisiveness is rare. It goes on to talk about NBC - is that a liberal news network now? And examples of MSNBC hosts calling the GOP racist - which to a significant extent is true... I didn't read much more.



Okay, you ask for opinions and I provide them and you don't like them. Fine.

Quote:

Quote:

Seems to me it was pretty much pushed as a racial thing. Stuff like NBC modifying the tape of Zimmerman's 911 call to make it sound more racist come to mind.

That's one incident, are you treating that as representative of the whole media coverage?


As representative of a lot of the media coverage. Lots of the stuff seemed pretty inflamatory to me.

Quote:

Quote:

I believe it's because Blacks and white liberals had higher expectations of Pres. Obama working to improve the lot of minorities than they would a white president. When he didn't meet those expectations, while helping out the rich white folks, the disappointment was greater.

I think you view the black community as like an angry bear, that when it loses its temper invariably rages against white people. When a rock falls in its head, it rages against white people. When it gets stung by a bee, it rages against white people. When a black president disappoints it, it rages against white people.


No. I think that race relations is much more complex than the races "raging" against each other. Sometimes it just them being disappointed that things aren't working better. Do you see blacks as only capable of rage? Seems so.

Quote:

Quote:

Here's an article on what African-Americans expected from Obama.

That wasn't what I asked. I asked how could Obama have improved race relations. Do you seriously think if Obama had followed the advice of the writer of that article, and worked primarily towards the advancement of black people in the US and in Africa, then that would have improved race relations in the US?



You don't think that If Pres. Obama had done some of the things that blacks wanted, and what both blacks and liberal whites expected him to do after the 2008 election, that it wouldn't have improved race relations by fulfilling their expectations, making blacks feel more a part of the country, and making liberals feel that blacks were getting a much-needed better deal?

Let me ask you. What do you think Pres. Obama could have done to improve race relations, or don't you think he has any ability to do so?



"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 14, 2013 7:38 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Okay, you ask for opinions and I provide them and you don't like them. Fine.

No, YOU suggested that the left had done some actions to sour race relations, I asked for examples and you posted an opinion piece (and a weak one). Can you speak for yourself and say what you think the left has done to sour race relations?

Quote:

As representative of a lot of the media coverage. Lots of the stuff seemed pretty inflamatory to me.

Well, if you can manage to put your finger on what exactly was wrong with the media's coverage, perhaps with a more typical example, I'd be happy to hear.

Quote:

No. I think that race relations is much more complex than the races "raging" against each other. Sometimes it just them being disappointed that things aren't working better.

By definition, NO, that's not race relations. But we're getting nowhere here. I'll leave you to your bizarre theory that black people being disappointed means worse race relations.

Quote:

Do you see blacks as only capable of rage? Seems so.

Yawn.

Quote:

You don't think that If Pres. Obama had done some of the things that blacks wanted, and what both blacks and liberal whites expected him to do after the 2008 election, that it wouldn't have improved race relations

Which specific policies would these be? I think you're mad if you think this president can conduct policies primarily for the benefit of minorities, and that right-wing, white America won't flip out about it, and label him 'racist in chief' etc. Hell, the right is already this way - imagine if they actually had some justification for their rhetoric?

Anything besides this that you think Obama has done to worsen race relations?

Quote:

Let me ask you. What do you think Pres. Obama could have done to improve race relations, or don't you think he has any ability to do so?

Things to understand:

1. Obama has improved race relations. The numbers jumped up as soon as he was elected, and only recently dipped to Bush levels with the Zimmerman case.

2. The fact that race relations have got worse recently does not mean that Obama or the left must have negatively contributed. It's entirely possible that Obama and the left positively contributed to race relations in this period.

3. The poll numbers are not a direct measure of race relations, but how would you measure that? The only thing you can measure is people's perceptions of race relations, which is a reflection of how race relations actually are. (I thought I would add this point because I sensed you wanting to make a thing about the poll numbers)

To answer your question, I think Obama has done a good job with race relations, has done much to improve them, and very little to upset them. I certainly wouldn't call it a failure on his part.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 14, 2013 8:56 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

Do you see blacks as only capable of rage? Seems so.

Yawn.




So you want me to do theses on race relations, but you won't answer a yes/no question?

Done here.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 14, 2013 9:59 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Theses? I ask you to back up arguments you've already made... But don't worry, an inability to do so is an answer in itself.

Ask more intelligent, less inane questions if you want to be answered.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Tue, April 16, 2024 07:14 - 6236 posts
Punishing Russia With Sanctions
Tue, April 16, 2024 02:04 - 504 posts
Dow Nearing 30K. Time For You To Jump Off?
Mon, April 15, 2024 21:24 - 106 posts
Elections; 2024
Mon, April 15, 2024 21:19 - 2245 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Mon, April 15, 2024 18:39 - 738 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Mon, April 15, 2024 17:54 - 366 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Mon, April 15, 2024 17:23 - 3519 posts
The Thread of Court Cases Trump Is Winning
Mon, April 15, 2024 15:32 - 18 posts
Have you guys been paying attention to the squatter situation in NYC? It's just escelated.
Mon, April 15, 2024 15:24 - 5 posts
As Palestinians pushes for statehood, Israel finds itself more isolated
Mon, April 15, 2024 13:44 - 284 posts
I agree with everything you said, but don't tell anyone I said that
Mon, April 15, 2024 11:37 - 12 posts
"Feminism" really means more Femtacular than you at EVERYTHING.
Sun, April 14, 2024 18:05 - 64 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL