REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Hillary makes a lot of promises, "hope" and "change" missing

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Friday, January 22, 2016 11:29
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1792
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, January 22, 2016 8:59 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

The front-runners for the two major-party presidential nominations disagree on more than just policies. They even disagree on whether they need to release any policies.

Democrat Hillary Clinton relishes details, rolling out more than two dozen policy proposals on everything from repairing roads to combating the Islamic State terrorist group, many with backup material and cost estimates.


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article55
938835.html#storylink=cpy

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 22, 2016 9:25 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


The only time I saw Hillary Clinton was in 2007.

Quote:

She walked past me down an otherwise empty hallway of the Russell Senate Office Building, with no staff in tow, but with a security detail.

We won't discuss the size, appearance, or tactical behavior of the detail, or the way she related or did not relate to it. Suffice to say it was gratuitously over-the-top, considering this building complex was secured at all doors by Capitol Police and metal detectors (which even badged staff had to go through), presumably with some quick reaction teams somewhere on a hair trigger.

Not to mention, the Democratic National Convention was still almost 18 months away. So far away, in fact, that I doubt the Secret Service would have gotten into the mix.

Maybe she was paying for this detail out of her "exploratory committee" funds. Or perhaps she was entitled to Secret Service protection after living in the White House—

As wife of an ex-President, yes...

Quote:

but given where she was, why not leave some of it at the door?

Was she afraid of getting jumped by some intern?

If you recall, a man named Barrack Obama was thinking of running for president then, too. I saw him a few times (even sat just behind him once), but did not witness such a blatant display of godlike apartness.

So as you can see, the security was to some extent personality-dependent.

I also saw Bernard Sanders many times. Once, I saw him in the Senate cafeteria, alone, sadly hunched over just a bowl of soup, nothing else.

It was the only time I ever saw a member of Congress (that I recognized, anyway) in either the House or Senate cafeterias.

Really, I could have sat down at that table and talked to the guy.

So it's clear that Bernard Sanders is a mortal like you and me.

At least back then, he looked like he could use a stylist. Someone to recommend some "product" for his hair. He may have splurged on a haircut since then.

But it would be no surprise if his wife still patches the holes in his socks.

And I believe he is the real deal, a true old-school Jewish utopian socialist from the years before mass-market color photography. A real blast-from-the-past.

He does have some hare-brained proposals, but I'm pretty sure he would not write a blank check to Big Finance or the defense-industrial and "intelligence" complexes, among other rent-collecting cartels and oligarchies.

Who knows, he might even close Gitmo.

Granted, I've no idea where he would draw his appointees from if he resolved to avoid getting mugged by the recidivist cliques left over from other administrations. Probably it would be amateur season like the early days of Bill Clinton or, frankly, Sanders' own Senate office in its first year or two.

But it can't be worse than returning the White House to someone who (stepping back in time) could have played Angela Lansbury's character in The Manchurian Candidate, or Livia Drusilla in BBC’s I Claudius.

Speaking strictly and only for myself (as always), I endorse Bernard Sanders for U.S. President.

I also endorse Donald Trump, who was never short of hair product, and whose ex-wives likely can't sew to save their lives, though he makes up for that by driving terror and panic into the Establishment in a manner not seen in my great country for probably over 100 years.

And either would be great for U.S.-Russia relations. (Probably Trump more so, but I'll take what I can get.)

Please, America, vote early and often for these two.

I’m quite sure it’s too late to save much of anything, but at least we can go down kicking, while cutting short the looting operation that our politico-financial elites—I don't consider Trump to be one of them, as his activities add real value and he has no true friends in Government—have now shifted into highest gear even as they contemplate Learjetting off to their ranches or wherever they think they can get away from what’s coming.



--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 22, 2016 10:33 AM

RAHLMACLAREN

"Damn yokels, can't even tell a transport ship ain't got no guns on it." - Jayne Cobb


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The only time I saw Hillary Clinton was in 2007.

Quote:

She walked past me down an otherwise empty hallway of the Russell Senate Office Building, with no staff in tow, but with a security detail.

We won't discuss the size, appearance, or tactical behavior of the detail, or the way she related or did not relate to it. Suffice to say it was gratuitously over-the-top, considering this building complex was secured at all doors by Capitol Police and metal detectors (which even badged staff had to go through), presumably with some quick reaction teams somewhere on a hair trigger.

Not to mention, the Democratic National Convention was still almost 18 months away. So far away, in fact, that I doubt the Secret Service would have gotten into the mix.

Maybe she was paying for this detail out of her "exploratory committee" funds. Or perhaps she was entitled to Secret Service protection after living in the White House—

As wife of an ex-President, yes...

Quote:

but given where she was, why not leave some of it at the door?

Was she afraid of getting jumped by some intern?

If you recall, a man named Barrack Obama was thinking of running for president then, too. I saw him a few times (even sat just behind him once), but did not witness such a blatant display of godlike apartness.

So as you can see, the security was to some extent personality-dependent.

I also saw Bernard Sanders many times. Once, I saw him in the Senate cafeteria, alone, sadly hunched over just a bowl of soup, nothing else.

It was the only time I ever saw a member of Congress (that I recognized, anyway) in either the House or Senate cafeterias.

Really, I could have sat down at that table and talked to the guy.

So it's clear that Bernard Sanders is a mortal like you and me.

At least back then, he looked like he could use a stylist. Someone to recommend some "product" for his hair. He may have splurged on a haircut since then.

But it would be no surprise if his wife still patches the holes in his socks.

And I believe he is the real deal, a true old-school Jewish utopian socialist from the years before mass-market color photography. A real blast-from-the-past.

He does have some hare-brained proposals, but I'm pretty sure he would not write a blank check to Big Finance or the defense-industrial and "intelligence" complexes, among other rent-collecting cartels and oligarchies.

Who knows, he might even close Gitmo.

Granted, I've no idea where he would draw his appointees from if he resolved to avoid getting mugged by the recidivist cliques left over from other administrations. Probably it would be amateur season like the early days of Bill Clinton or, frankly, Sanders' own Senate office in its first year or two.

But it can't be worse than returning the White House to someone who (stepping back in time) could have played Angela Lansbury's character in The Manchurian Candidate, or Livia Drusilla in BBC’s I Claudius.

Speaking strictly and only for myself (as always), I endorse Bernard Sanders for U.S. President.

I also endorse Donald Trump, who was never short of hair product, and whose ex-wives likely can't sew to save their lives, though he makes up for that by driving terror and panic into the Establishment in a manner not seen in my great country for probably over 100 years.

And either would be great for U.S.-Russia relations. (Probably Trump more so, but I'll take what I can get.)

Please, America, vote early and often for these two.

I’m quite sure it’s too late to save much of anything, but at least we can go down kicking, while cutting short the looting operation that our politico-financial elites—I don't consider Trump to be one of them, as his activities add real value and he has no true friends in Government—have now shifted into highest gear even as they contemplate Learjetting off to their ranches or wherever they think they can get away from what’s coming.



--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.



Don't forget your link, now.
http://www.therussophile.org/if-youre-american-heres-who-you-should-vo
te-for-in-2016.html
/



Find here the Serenity you seek. -Tara Maclay

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 22, 2016 10:39 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hmmm, interesting. That's not where I got the article.

And it still doesn't change the fact that Hillary is a warmongering Wall-Street bootlicker. But hey, vote for her if that's your pleasure. Just be prepared to explain it on something other than irrational thinking. Yanno- be prepared to discuss her record in full.

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 22, 2016 11:15 AM

RAHLMACLAREN

"Damn yokels, can't even tell a transport ship ain't got no guns on it." - Jayne Cobb


Could even be this one.
http://russia-insider.com/en/ri-endorses-us-presidential-candidates/ri
12358


Signym, I'm not sure who or whom you're trying to convince at this site, seeing how there's barely a handful that still come around.

You already know I started the "Bernie for Pres!" (a thread that got buried months ago), since you posted a sarcastic FEEL THE BERN there. I'm sorry, but I don't buy into your faux naivete.

Are you actually for a particular candidate, 'cause I thought you swore off all of them. Are you a political hipster suddenly felling some peer-pressure?

In any case, have fun with another bump thread.



Find here the Serenity you seek. -Tara Maclay

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 22, 2016 11:29 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I'm thinking about both Bernie and Trump. My current thinking is that I'll vote for whichever makes it to the November ballot, if any. If neither makes it to the ballot, I'll vote third party. If both make it to the ballot, I'll probably vote for whichever one looks like they'll win. I'm not crazy about either, but they're a damn sight better than the rest of the candidates. If I change my mind, I'll let you know.

Oh, BTW, to the best of my recollection, FEEL THE BERN was not meant sarcastically. Sanders has had my support for quite a while. It's lukewarm, but it's support.

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Fri, April 19, 2024 07:10 - 6265 posts
Elections; 2024
Fri, April 19, 2024 06:40 - 2273 posts
This is what baseball bats are for, not to mention you're the one in a car...
Thu, April 18, 2024 23:38 - 1 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Thu, April 18, 2024 23:20 - 742 posts
FACTS
Thu, April 18, 2024 19:48 - 548 posts
Biden's a winner, Trumps a loser. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Thu, April 18, 2024 18:38 - 148 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Thu, April 18, 2024 17:58 - 777 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, April 18, 2024 16:51 - 3530 posts
Why does THUGR shit up the board by bumping his pointless threads?
Thu, April 18, 2024 12:38 - 9 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Thu, April 18, 2024 10:21 - 834 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, April 17, 2024 23:58 - 1005 posts
Sentencing Thread
Wed, April 17, 2024 22:02 - 364 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL