REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"

POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Sunday, July 28, 2019 09:01
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 79672
PAGE 26 of 56

Saturday, August 25, 2018 8:45 AM

THG


T

The President Donald Trump Has Surrounded Himself With Criminals


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 25, 2018 9:01 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


It's no coincidence that Trump is surrounded by criminals.

Why did the president who planned to hire "the best people" end up surrounded by moochers, grifters, and criminals?

Because working for Trump is horrible and unfulfilling — unless you plan to use the job as an opportunity to stuff everything you can in your pockets, and then you might think Trump's combination of no ethics and no supervision will work to your advantage.

More at www.businessinsider.com/trump-surrounded-by-criminals-michael-cohen-pa
ul-manafort-2018-8


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 25, 2018 12:35 PM

JO753

rezident owtsidr


Everybodyz tokking impeachment now.



----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 25, 2018 2:19 PM

CAPTAINCRUNCH

... stay crunchy...


I've heard some talk of "resigning." With the new criminal exposure for Trump Foundation and Organization and the parade of flippers, people are noticing how the Trump vermin are now left out in the open. Would he quit to protect them? Or throw them under the bus and let them do time? Would resigning protect them even? Could he make a deal that would protect them "for the good of the country??"
And, is it better for the Dems to have the nation keep witnessing Trump's public implosion and the GOP's complete worthlessness, something an impeachment might take away? As hard as it is to imagine, Trump on trial might actually make him seem sympathetic... I know, super hard to believe!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 25, 2018 3:00 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


I think it's great. We get to witness all that you said as well as continually witnessing how juvenile, petty and hypocritical the Left is about everything too.

I hope that Trump destroys both parties when it's all said and done. This government needs an enema.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 25, 2018 7:01 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I've heard some talk of "resigning." With the new criminal exposure for Trump Foundation and Organization and the parade of flippers, people are noticing how the Trump vermin are now left out in the open. Would he quit to protect them? Or throw them under the bus and let them do time? Would resigning protect them even? Could he make a deal that would protect them "for the good of the country??"
And, is it better for the Dems to have the nation keep witnessing Trump's public implosion and the GOP's complete worthlessness, something an impeachment might take away? As hard as it is to imagine, Trump on trial might actually make him seem sympathetic... I know, super hard to believe!



Trump would throw his own family under the bus to protect himself. We may actually get to see him do that.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 25, 2018 7:17 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN



Only 2,440 days remaining on the Impeachment Clock.

How exciting. 001286

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 25, 2018 7:24 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I think it's great. We get to witness all that you said as well as continually witnessing how juvenile, petty and hypocritical the Left is about everything too.


This government needs an enema.

You finally understand the meaning of Draining The Swamp.

And you see he is doing it, too.

Although Trump, Manafort, have not committed any crimes since 2014 (lifelong Democrat Cohen has not committed any crimes since becoming Republican in 2017 - after Tax Evasion for 5 years 2012-2016 as Democrat), watching Libtards display their hypocrisy can be gratifying.
Knowing that Hilliary's Gang of Criminals and Thugs have obviously committed scores of Felonies and Treasons, their pretext is that they haven't noticed.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 8:44 AM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Did Trump sanction Flynns discussions with Russia at the very time Putin was hacking us and trying to have an influence on our election? Just this morning Flynn tweeted "scapegoat"


How many days did your "Countdown Clock" have on it? It's been 98 days now. Or are you planning on a 3,000 Day Countdown?



It depends on what charge leads the way and how long it takes to compile a case. I think it will most likely be corruption charges. Perhaps tax fraud or money laundering. Trumps actions have allowed for the investigation to go anywhere Trump exhibited questionable behavior. Do you remember Ken Starr? The Clinton investigation started out looking into a real estate deal. Clinton wound up being impeached for lying about an affair.

Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime. Are you willing to put money on that?




T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 10:01 AM

THG


Fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pled guilty.

T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 1:56 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I think it's great. We get to witness all that you said as well as continually witnessing how juvenile, petty and hypocritical the Left is about everything too.


This government needs an enema.

You finally understand the meaning of Draining The Swamp.

And you see he is doing it, too.

Although Trump, Manafort, have not committed any crimes since 2014 (lifelong Democrat Cohen has not committed any crimes since becoming Republican in 2017 - after Tax Evasion for 5 years 2012-2016 as Democrat), watching Libtards display their hypocrisy can be gratifying.
Knowing that Hilliary's Gang of Criminals and Thugs have obviously committed scores of Felonies and Treasons, their pretext is that they haven't noticed.



What do you mean finally?

Even though I don't personally care much for Trump the longer he stays in office, this is the one thing that I've said had been going on since the start. High level government people on both sides of the aisle have been exposed for corruption, quit on their laughable moral grounds or just fired for plain incompetence at record numbers in the last 2 years.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 1:58 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pled guilty.

T



Going to need a cite from an unbiased source to back that one up, bud.

Good luck finding one.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 2:35 PM

THG


Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 2:38 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I've heard some talk of "resigning." With the new criminal exposure for Trump Foundation and Organization and the parade of flippers, people are noticing how the Trump vermin are now left out in the open. Would he quit to protect them? Or throw them under the bus and let them do time? Would resigning protect them even? Could he make a deal that would protect them "for the good of the country??"
And, is it better for the Dems to have the nation keep witnessing Trump's public implosion and the GOP's complete worthlessness, something an impeachment might take away? As hard as it is to imagine, Trump on trial might actually make him seem sympathetic... I know, super hard to believe!

A sitting President can't be indicted on criminal charges. If Trump has a plan, why should he quit when he has a tremendous grace period to continue his work?




THUGGER admits it's not about RUSSIA !!! and is, in fact, a witch hunt. "Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 3:00 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.



It was really a rhetorical question thrown your way. I'm confident that there aren't any seriously unbiased sites that would back up your statistic that you pulled out of your ass there.

One would imagine that any site that does back up that claim today is one of the very same sites that had Hillary winning by a landslide 2 years ago at this time.




Just because you don't demand better from your mainstream media doesn't mean that everybody can just go around throwing out false statements and expect to be taken seriously when they do.




And by the way man... why so angry and mean all the time? You really need to relax.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 3:18 PM

CAPTAINCRUNCH

... stay crunchy...


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Quote:

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I've heard some talk of "resigning." With the new criminal exposure for Trump Foundation and Organization and the parade of flippers, people are noticing how the Trump vermin are now left out in the open. Would he quit to protect them? Or throw them under the bus and let them do time? Would resigning protect them even? Could he make a deal that would protect them "for the good of the country??"
And, is it better for the Dems to have the nation keep witnessing Trump's public implosion and the GOP's complete worthlessness, something an impeachment might take away? As hard as it is to imagine, Trump on trial might actually make him seem sympathetic... I know, super hard to believe!

A sitting President can't be indicted on criminal charges. If Trump has a plan, why should he quit when he has a tremendous grace period to continue his work?



A sitting president can be impeached and "face the possibility of conviction via legislative vote, which then entails the removal of the individual from office." - wikipedia

Why would he resign? It's a long shot, but he might for a similar reason Nixon resigned: pressure from his party. Yes, that seems very unlikely, but Trump isn't done insulting everyone in the world that could do himself and "his" party harm, and we have yet to hear from Mueller who may have some evidence of some explosive wrong doing. So who knows - the situation is fluid. If you believe as I do that Trump is definitely not a quitter, that he'd rather spend the rest of his first term effortlessly, shamelessly spinning lies, then what is fascinating to think of is if he were impeached and found guilty, how would they remove him if he said, "I'm not leaving! Come and get me" What the heck would that look like?!?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 3:29 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Why should he quit when he can take his time waiting for an impeachment - AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE - which will not happen in his first term?

You keep making bogus statements that you have to abandon with your very next bogus statement. At this point, I'm just going to flag them as bogus and not bother responding in particular.




THUGGER admits it's not about RUSSIA !!! and is, in fact, a witch hunt. "Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 4:07 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:

Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.



It was really a rhetorical question thrown your way. I'm confident that there aren't any seriously unbiased sites that would back up your statistic that you pulled out of your ass there.

One would imagine that any site that does back up that claim today is one of the very same sites that had Hillary winning by a landslide 2 years ago at this time.

Just because you don't demand better from your mainstream media doesn't mean that everybody can just go around throwing out false statements and expect to be taken seriously when they do.

And by the way man... why so angry and mean all the time? You really need to relax.



"And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/nbc-wsj-poll-trump-approva
l-remarkably-stable-after-stormy-week-n903626


It's just to easy proving you to be a moron Jack. Thanks for continuing to give me so many opportunities.


T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 5:46 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:

Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.



It was really a rhetorical question thrown your way. I'm confident that there aren't any seriously unbiased sites that would back up your statistic that you pulled out of your ass there.

One would imagine that any site that does back up that claim today is one of the very same sites that had Hillary winning by a landslide 2 years ago at this time.

Just because you don't demand better from your mainstream media doesn't mean that everybody can just go around throwing out false statements and expect to be taken seriously when they do.

And by the way man... why so angry and mean all the time? You really need to relax.



"And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/nbc-wsj-poll-trump-approva
l-remarkably-stable-after-stormy-week-n903626


It's just to easy proving you to be a moron Jack. Thanks for continuing to give me so many opportunities.


T




The article is pretty convoluted and states several polls. The quote you put here doesn't specify which poll in question, nor are there any links to the polls themselves or information about the demographics that were polled.

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.


That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.




If we're going to talk seriously about any polling, they need to link to the actual polls, or do better when showing the demographics of the polling. This doesn't cut it:

Quote:

The earlier NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll surveyed 900 registered voters between Aug. 18-22, 2018. The margin of error is +/- 3.27 percent.

The second NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll surveyed 600 registered voters between Aug. 22-25, 2018. The margin of error is +/- 4.00 percent.



The entire article implies that there was an equal polling of demographics here, but nowhere does the polling information state that this is the case.

This is why all the polling results for Hillary Clinton's loss were so off base from reality.




Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to put on display how easily you are swayed by the media when it tells you want to hear and how superficial you are when it comes to actually verifying any journalistic integrity of your sources. You haven't even bothered to scratch the surface here.


Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 6:18 PM

THG


With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 26, 2018 6:48 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T




Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 27, 2018 10:23 AM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T




Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.




OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 27, 2018 10:42 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

In the final analysis, Trump is safe while he is President and there are 34 GOP Senators. But there will be a popularity vote in 2020 on whether Trump remains President. And Trump's legal problems will affect that vote a tiny bit. If he loses and becomes a civilian again, rather than dropping dead from a stroke or heart attack, he will not be safe from his legal problems as President, despite him pardoning himself.

I hope the day comes when Trump regrets being elected. He is not there yet:
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

Over 90% approval rating for your all time favorite (I hope) President within the Republican Party and 52% overall. This despite all of the made up stories by the Fake News Media trying endlessly to make me look as bad and evil as possible. Look at the real villains please!
5:39 PM - 26 Aug 2018
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1033876658439245825

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 27, 2018 3:59 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T




Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.




OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T




The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 27, 2018 4:23 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T




Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.




OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T




The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)



Quote:


Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.


That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.



Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 27, 2018 4:58 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T




Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.




OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T




The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)



Quote:


Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.


That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.



Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T




Yup. So you are.

I quoted that from the article that you linked.

Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.


Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.


You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have these great computer mice with scroll buttons so you don't have to manually use the scroll bars.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 28, 2018 12:08 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Why should he quit when he can take his time waiting for an impeachment - AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE - which will not happen in his first term?

You keep making bogus statements that you have to abandon with your very next bogus statement. At this point, I'm just going to flag them as bogus and not bother responding in particular.

THUGGER admits it's not about RUSSIA !!! and is, in fact, a witch hunt. "Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime."

methinks you spend far too much time feeding the Trolls already. Sorry I can't spend more time here to balance out the Trolls.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 28, 2018 12:19 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T



Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T



The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

6ix might be confused.

It is a proven fact that Liberals have an average IQ below 90.


OK, now that that is posted on algore's interwebs it is now Fact, and can be referenced by others as a valid source. And if somebody else mentions it, I can then refer to their mention as a source, and in fact can state that their mention is a basis for my statement.
That is how journalism works for Liberals, for many decades now.
Get it?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 28, 2018 1:08 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


NBC News/Wall Street Journal Survey
August 18-22, 2018
http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/i/today/z_creative/18798NBCWSJAugustPoll.p
df


NBC News/Wall Street Journal Survey
August 22-25, 2018
http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/i/today/z_creative/18852NBCWSJAugustN=600F
lashPoll.pdf




WASHINGTON — After a week that saw President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman convicted on eight counts of fraud and his former lawyer plead guilty to felony campaign finance charges, the president's job approval rating remains virtually unchanged, new polling from NBC News and The Wall Street Journal shows.

But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.

Between Aug. 18 and Aug. 22 — the day after the news involving former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and former Trump attorney Michael Cohen — the president's approval rating stood at 46 percent approve, 51 percent disapprove.

In a separate NBC/WSJ survey, conducted Aug. 22 through Aug. 25, Trump's approval rating was 44 percent approve and 52 percent disapprove. That's within the poll's margin of error.

Republican pollster Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies, who conducted this survey with Democratic pollster Peter Hart and his team at Hart Research Associates, called Trump's approval rating "remarkably stable" despite the Manafort and Cohen developments, both of which became public on the same afternoon last Tuesday.

Hart added that, for Democrats hoping to craft a midterm election strategy, the week's news thus far "represents a fool's-gold opportunity rather than a silver-bullet solution."

NBC News and The Wall Street Journal originally planned to survey respondents from Saturday, Aug. 18 thru Wednesday, Aug. 22. But after the Aug. 21 conviction of Manafort on tax and fraud charges — and the news that Cohen is cooperating with federal prosecutors after his guilty plea— the news organizations took the unusual step of commissioning an additional poll of 600 respondents from Wednesday, Aug. 22 to Saturday, Aug. 25. That second poll included questions about Manafort and Cohen as well as a look at the president’s approval rating after the new developments.

Despite the durability of Trump's approval even after one of the most dire weeks of his presidency, most voters are not convinced that Trump himself is completely insulated from the legal woes of his associates.

Asked if they believe that the six Trump associates who have pleaded guilty or been found guilty of crimes signals only that those individuals committed crimes or that Trump himself may have participated in wrongdoing, 27 percent cite just the individuals (not Trump), 40 percent say Trump may be involved with potential wrongdoing and 30 percent don't know.

A majority of voters also say that Trump has not been honest and truthful when it comes to the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Twenty-one percent strongly agree that he has been honest and truthful, 17 percent agree somewhat, 10 percent disagree somewhat and a plurality — 46 percent — disagree strongly.

Inside those numbers, however, there's some evidence that Republican defense of Trump's truthfulness is relatively soft. Among Democrats, 81 percent strongly disagree that Trump has been honest. Among Republicans, just 46 percent strongly agree that he has been honest.

And just about half (53 percent) of Republicans say that the guilty pleas by Trump's associates are limited only to those individuals and not the president, while a third — 35 percent — don't know enough to say.

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.

The Manafort and the Cohen developments are also solidly on voters' radar screens. Asked if they have heard about Paul Manafort being found guilty of multiple tax and bank fraud charges, 46 percent say they have heard a lot, 38 percent say they have heard some and 14 percent say they have not heard about it. Asked if they have heard about Michael Cohen pleading guilty to federal felony campaign finance charges, 46 percent say they have heard a lot, 34 percent say they have heard some, and 20 percent say they have not heard about it.

(That percentage makes Cohen and Manafort a big story, but not a huge one. For comparison, it's about the same percentage overall (around 80 percent of Americans) who had heard about former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's Bridgegate scandal when it was receiving prominent news coverage, but a smaller share than had heard about the Access Hollywood tape (95 percent).

The earlier NBC/WSJ poll — conducted Aug. 18 through Aug. 22 — showed Democrats with an 8-point lead in congressional preference, with 50 percent of voters preferring a Democratic-controlled Congress and with 42 percent wanting Republicans in charge.

Last month, Democrats were ahead by 6 points on this question, 49 percent to 43 percent.

Voters were split on what concerns them more — Republicans not providing a check and balance on Trump if they control Congress (46 percent who say this), or Democrats going too far in obstructing the president if they’re in charge (45 percent).

They also were divided on what bothers them more — a Democratic candidate who supports House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s policies (47 percent), or a Republican candidate who supports Trump’s policies (45 percent).

And asked their opinions of Democrats winning control of the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate, 41 percent of voters said that would be a good thing, while 38 percent say it would be a bad thing.

Still, Democrats continue to enjoy an edge in enthusiasm: 63 percent of Democratic voters express a high level of interest in the upcoming elections — registering either a “9” or “10” on a 10-point scale — compared with 52 percent of GOP voters who do the same.

What’s more, 56 percent of Democratic voters believe November’s elections are more important to them than past congressional elections, versus just 38 percent of Republicans who think that.

“Democrats are going to win [House] seats in 2018,” says Democratic pollster Fred Yang of Hart Research Associates. “The question is: How many will that be?”

“The reason why the Democrats still have the upper hand is the enthusiasm issue,” Yang adds.

The NBC/WSJ survey conducted mostly before the Cohen-Manafort news also finds Republicans with a 14-point advantage in which party better deals with the economy — their biggest lead on this question in the poll’s history.

Forty-three percent of voters say the GOP better handles the economy, while 29 percent pick the Democrats.

Republicans also hold the edge on trade (R+8), taxes (R+5), guns (R+5) and changing how Washington works (R+4).

Democrats, meanwhile, have the advantages on the environment (D+38), health care (D+18), ethics in government (D+14), looking out for the middle class (D+12) and immigration (D+4).

Finally, the earlier NBC/WSJ poll shows 33 percent of voters supporting Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, versus 29 who oppose his nomination; 37 percent say they don’t know enough to have an opinion.

In July, it was 32 percent support, 26 percent oppose.

The earlier NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll surveyed 900 registered voters between Aug. 18-22, 2018. The margin of error is +/- 3.27 percent.

The second NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll surveyed 600 registered voters between Aug. 22-25, 2018. The margin of error is +/- 4.00 percent.








THUGGER admits it's not about RUSSIA !!! and is, in fact, a witch hunt. "Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 28, 2018 8:26 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T




Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.




OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T




The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)



Quote:


Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.


That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.



Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T




Yup. So you are.

I quoted that from the article that you linked.

Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.


Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.


You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have these great computer mice with scroll buttons so you don't have to manually use the scroll bars.

Do Right, Be Right. :)





Still waiting for proof that you read the article you sourced here, T.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 28, 2018 10:13 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


I think THUGGER might be confused by the shifting baselines used in the descriptions. Let's say I run a poll and the results are: 1/3 think the earth is flat, 1/3 think the earth is a globe, and 1/3 aren't sure. I could state "a minority thinks the earth is a globe", or I could state "an overwhelming majority aren't convinced the earth is flat". Same numbers, and both are completely accurate summaries, but you get a different impression from each.

That's why it's FAR better to access the actual polls (what questions were asked, in what context, what categories were given), as well as the actual numbers.

What I found interesting is that opinions about Trump have remained steady over MONTHS. But only the most recent numbers were discussed, as if they were, somehow, 'new's - as if they were the newest thing that was different and worthy of attention. Also, people who think the investigation should be wrapped up soon increased beyond the margin of error, as a result of lower within error numbers of "weren't sure/ had no opinion", and lower within error numbers of "continue".




THUGGER admits it's not about RUSSIA !!! and is, in fact, a witch hunt. "Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 28, 2018 10:21 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T




Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.




OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T




The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)



Quote:


Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.


That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.



Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T




Yup. So you are.

I quoted that from the article that you linked.

Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.


Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.


You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have these great computer mice with scroll buttons so you don't have to manually use the scroll bars.

Do Right, Be Right. :)



And you wonder why I call you moron. Read it again yourself. You've linked two things together that should not be linked. What a fucking ass.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 29, 2018 4:21 AM

JO753

rezident owtsidr


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:Let's say I run a poll and the results are: 1/3 think the earth is flat, 1/3 think the earth is a globe, and 1/3 aren't sure.


You forgot the .1% hoo think the Earth iz a cube.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 29, 2018 7:58 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T




Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.




OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T




The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)



Quote:


Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.


That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.



Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T




Yup. So you are.

I quoted that from the article that you linked.

Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.


Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.


You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have these great computer mice with scroll buttons so you don't have to manually use the scroll bars.

Do Right, Be Right. :)



And you wonder why I call you moron. Read it again yourself. You've linked two things together that should not be linked. What a fucking ass.

T




If they shouldn't be linked together, they probably shouldn't have been put in the same article and presented in a disingenuous way.

You can't be bothered to read the links you post, so I can't help you with that man.

What has happened here is you only read far enough into the article to confirm your own confirmation bias. When it started to say things you didn't want to hear you tuned out.


Please, keep insulting my intelligence and swearing at me too. You're putting on an excellent show of how childish and petty you really are.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 29, 2018 7:59 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T




Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.




OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T




The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)



Quote:


Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.


That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.



Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T




Yup. So you are.

I quoted that from the article that you linked.

Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.


Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.


You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have these great computer mice with scroll buttons so you don't have to manually use the scroll bars.

Do Right, Be Right. :)



And you wonder why I call you moron. Read it again yourself. You've linked two things together that should not be linked. What a fucking ass.

T




If they shouldn't be linked together, they probably shouldn't have been put in the same article and presented in a disingenuous way.

You can't be bothered to read the links you post, so I can't help you with that man.

What has happened here is you only read far enough into the article to confirm your own confirmation bias. When it started to say things you didn't want to hear you tuned out.


Please, keep insulting my intelligence and swearing at me, rather than coming up with an intelligent argument for your point. You're putting on an excellent show of how childish and petty you really are.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 29, 2018 8:11 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by JO753:
Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:Let's say I run a poll and the results are: 1/3 think the earth is flat, 1/3 think the earth is a globe, and 1/3 aren't sure.


You forgot the .1% hoo think the Earth iz a cube.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

The only poll that counts is the poll of the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

There is a single question on the poll: "Are you A) Republican? or B) Democrat?"

If the answer is A) then Trump voters can ignore impeachment talk and can disregard all evidence. If the answer is B) then there is a second poll to be taken of Senators.

It also only has one question, the same question: "Are you A) Republican? or B) Democrat?"

If the answer is A) for 34 or more Senators, then Trump voters can ignore impeachment talk and can disregard all evidence. On the other hand, Trump does not understand polls, so he is always freaked out by every little development. Trump talks like a mob boss — and reminds us he has no idea what he’s doing. Someday we may want a president who knows what he’s talking about.
www.vox.com/2018/8/23/17772990/trump-fox-and-friends-transcript

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 29, 2018 8:44 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Someday we may want a president who knows what he’s talking about.



Haven't seen one yet in my lifetime.

You're older than I am though. Maybe you have.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 29, 2018 1:04 PM

THG


JO753 for president!!!

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 30, 2018 1:02 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

The Case Against Impeaching Trump
- Alan Dershowitz

Alan Dershowitz has been called “one of the most prominent and consistent defenders of civil liberties in America” by Politico and “the nation’s most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer and one of its most distinguished defenders of individual rights” by Newsweek. Yet he has come under partisan fire for applying those same principles to Donald Trump during the course of his many appearances in national media outlets as an expert resource on civil and constitutional law...

“In the fervor to impeach President Trump, his political enemies have ignored the text of the Constitution. As a civil libertarian who voted against Trump, I remind those who would impeach him not to run roughshod over a document that has protected us all for two and a quarter centuries. In this case against impeachment, I make arguments similar to those I made against the impeachment of President Bill Clinton (and that I would be making had Hillary Clinton been elected and Republicans were seeking to impeach her). Impeachment and removal of a president are not entirely political decisions by Congress. Every member takes an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution sets out specific substantive criteria that MUST be met.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 30, 2018 1:32 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Today’s Crazy Trump Tweet:

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

What’s going on at @CNN is happening, to different degrees, at other networks - with @NBCNews being the worst. The good news is that Andy Lack(y) is about to be fired(?) for incompetence, and much worse. When Lester Holt got caught fudging my tape on Russia, they were hurt badly!
6:02 AM - Aug 30, 2018
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1035120511259500544

I’m sure you haven’t forgotten this, but here’s the tape of Trump’s interview with Lester Holt shortly after he fired James Comey:



This was basically an admission that he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation. It’s been out there for more than a year, just sitting around for everyone to hear over and over and over: a bald admission that Trump obstructed justice. For some reason Trump never seemed to understand just how badly he had incriminated himself in this interview, but it sounds like maybe one of his lawyers finally got through to him. So now there’s a new story: Lester Holt fudged the tape!

This is, needless to say, ridiculous and unhinged. Trump must be completely freaked out at this point, and after telling this absurd lie about fudging the tape his lawyers must be freaked out too. Telling an obvious tall tale in an effort to discredit a piece of damaging evidence does nothing except make the evidence even more damaging in a court of law. This whole thing is really starting to come unraveled.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 31, 2018 9:47 AM

THG


New York’s attorney general says Trump Foundation bankrolled political campaign, pursues lawsuit

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/new-yorks-attorney-general-says-
trump-foundation-bankrolled-political-campaign-pursues-lawsuit


T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 1, 2018 5:06 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:


Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.

T


Somebody doth protest too much.
Protesting request of cites.
Suggesting cites can only come from Fake News sources.
Failing to comprehend that admission that no valid cites or sources exist.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 1, 2018 5:15 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:


Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.

T


Somebody doth protest too much.
Protesting request of cites.
Suggesting cites can only come from Fake News sources.
Failing to comprehend that admission that no valid cites or sources exist.



Here we go folks. Moron number two. Have someone you know with half a brain explain to you what my post means. Your response shows me you don't have a clue.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, September 2, 2018 3:21 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:


Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.

T


Somebody doth protest too much.
Protesting request of cites.
Suggesting cites can only come from Fake News sources.
Failing to comprehend that admission that no valid cites or sources exist.

Of course, if any valid cites existed, they could have been readily produced, without resorting to Fake News.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, September 2, 2018 3:26 PM

THG


Former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos said both Attorney General Jeff Sessions and President Trump supported his proposition that Trump meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin during the 2016 campaign, according to court documents filed late Friday night.

Opps...That would mean Sessions lied under oath. Not once but many times. Was that the big news Chuck Todd spoke about? I think that's big news don't you?

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 4, 2018 4:30 PM

THG



T


Giuliani says Trump will try to block Mueller’s report. Could it work? Washington Post



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 5, 2018 6:27 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN



Only 2,429 days remaining on the Impeachment Clock.

How exciting. 001286

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 5, 2018 8:30 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Only 2,429 days remaining on the Impeachment Clock.

How exciting. 001286

Imperious, impatient and immature, Donald Trump is the King Baby of presidents, a man who is incapable of rising to the demands of the most important job on earth.

How exciting!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 8, 2018 10:16 AM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Only 2,429 days remaining on the Impeachment Clock.

How exciting. 001286

Imperious, impatient and immature, Donald Trump is the King Baby of presidents, a man who is incapable of rising to the demands of the most important job on earth.

How exciting!



59 days, tick tock

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 8, 2018 12:25 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
59 days, tick tock

T





Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Alarm as Trump Requests Permanent Reauthorization of NSA Mass Spying Program Exposed by Snowden
Sat, August 17, 2019 18:04 - 1 posts
Dear Abby's column for 6ix, Rappy, and JSF.
Sat, August 17, 2019 17:18 - 11 posts
The truth: It's too late. We will go extinct, very soon. Enjoy the time you have left.
Sat, August 17, 2019 17:16 - 488 posts
He was on suicide watch and then commited suicide
Sat, August 17, 2019 16:45 - 108 posts
Portable Nuclear Reactor Engine Explodes in Russia
Sat, August 17, 2019 16:31 - 8 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!!!
Sat, August 17, 2019 16:17 - 2539 posts
Dow @ 20K. Time to jump off!
Sat, August 17, 2019 16:12 - 937 posts
Rite Winging for Fun & Profit
Sat, August 17, 2019 15:51 - 25 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Sat, August 17, 2019 14:48 - 2651 posts
Trump Administration Tried To Bury His Climate Study
Sat, August 17, 2019 14:45 - 24 posts
Internet (and other media) censorship
Sat, August 17, 2019 14:13 - 17 posts
Boeing 737 Max
Sat, August 17, 2019 10:56 - 120 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL