REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

society as narrative

POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 19:26
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2110
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, July 5, 2019 1:11 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


So, I just read an interesting essay, that said in part this:

And then, there are the oligarchs. The master manipulators. These corporate kings of the modern world have learned the secret that every ruler since the dawn of civilization has known: whoever controls the narratives that are believed by a society is the controller of that society. Identity, language, etiquette, social roles, opinions, ideology, religion, ethnicity, philosophy, agendas, rules, laws, money, economics, jobs, hierarchies, politics, government: all mental constructs which only influence society to the extent that they are believed and subscribed to by a significant majority of the collective. If you have influence over the things that people believe about those mental constructs, you have influence over society. You rule it. The oligarchs manipulate the narratives of entire societies.

And it occurred to me one could determine who's running society by determining what the narrative is (even though the narrative may be such a deep assumption it doesn't bubble to the surface as a formed thought). Because those formulators of the narrative have created it to serve their interests. Therefore, the narrative has their inextricable imprint.

For example:

the kings have the divine right to rule
the kings and the church

if proper sacrifice isn't made to the sun it won't return from its underworld cave
the kings and the priests

you need money to survive
... ... ...

you need to work at a job to live
... ... ...

profit is the primary inborn human motivation
... ... ...



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 5, 2019 4:53 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, I just read an interesting essay, that said in part this:

And then, there are the oligarchs. The master manipulators. These corporate kings of the modern world have learned the secret that every ruler since the dawn of civilization has known: whoever controls the narratives that are believed by a society is the controller of that society. Identity, language, etiquette, social roles, opinions, ideology, religion, ethnicity, philosophy, agendas, rules, laws, money, economics, jobs, hierarchies, politics, government: all mental constructs which only influence society to the extent that they are believed and subscribed to by a significant majority of the collective. If you have influence over the things that people believe about those mental constructs, you have influence over society. You rule it. The oligarchs manipulate the narratives of entire societies.

And it occurred to me one could determine who's running society by determining what the narrative is (even though the narrative may be such a deep assumption it doesn't bubble to the surface as a formed thought). Because those formulators of the narrative have created it to serve their interests. Therefore, the narrative has their inextricable imprint.

For example:

the kings have the divine right to rule
the kings and the church

if proper sacrifice isn't made to the sun it won't return from its underworld cave
the kings and the priests

you need money to survive
... ... ...

you need to work at a job to live
... ... ...

profit is the primary inborn human motivation
... ... ...

This makes me recall DeBoers.
As a campaign to prove that women were insufferably stupid, he first garnered the majority of the mines of worthless diamonds, then endeavored to skyrocket their price. Convincing women that these worthless elements were really, truly, a sign of love or commitment, thereby forcing men to purchase these worthless baubles at whatever the going price was.
Diamonds are a girl's best friend.
Diamonds are forever.
Every kiss begins with a diamond.
Diamonds mean Love.
If he Love you, he buys you a diamond.

Women have been all too happy to prove him right, for more than a century. His minions even massacre local peasants around the mines, if they are found to be using centuries-old doorstops which happen to be rock diamond.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 5, 2019 5:32 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


One good example albeit limited in scope.

I was thinking that 'one' could reverse engineer the narratives as a tool to ferret-out who is really in control of the society.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 5, 2019 8:45 PM

JONGSSTRAW


My parents and my wife have been my greatest influences. My parents gave me my values and my wife & kids gave me my life. Everything else is very, very far down the list of things that have any influence on me. If something or someone fits what I already believe in, I'll take a look. If it doesn't fit I turn away. Only valueless and vapid creatures are influenced by advertising and cults of personality.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 5, 2019 9:19 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


It goes beyond and deeper than advertising and cults of personality.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 5, 2019 9:43 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
And it occurred to me one could determine who's running society by determining what the narrative is (even though the narrative may be such a deep assumption it doesn't bubble to the surface as a formed thought). Because those formulators of the narrative have created it to serve their interests. Therefore, the narrative has their inextricable imprint.




I doubt very much we could reverse engineer any of this.

The path is lined with so many bear traps, trip lines and lame red herrings that you end up turning into Alex Jones or Rachel Maddow or even worse the more you dwell on it.

Just take solace in the fact that it's not a lack of intelligence preventing you from finding out what's at the bottom of the rabbit hole. It's just that you weren't born into it is all.

One could only assume that 99.9% of those that have "everything" and truly believe that they were born into "it" don't even really have a clue about what is really going on either.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 5, 2019 11:46 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
I doubt very much we could reverse engineer any of this.

I'm not talking about specifics like "who's behind 9/11". I'm talking broad scope. Narrative is the story of who you are, who we are, and why things are they way they are.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 5, 2019 11:56 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
I doubt very much we could reverse engineer any of this.

I'm not talking about specifics like "who's behind 9/11". I'm talking broad scope. Narrative is the story of who you are, who we are, and why things are they way they are.




I'm not talking specifics either. At least not on an individual basis.

So, who are "we"?

Starting wars all over the world. Either directly or indirectly.

Pumping up our people with patriotism to the gills for decades upon decades that we believe we're better than everyone else to the point that we continue to use the inferior Imperial system of measurement while the rest of the world uses the vastly superior Metric system, cause 'Merica!

Brainwashing half of the people in the country to think one way while brainwashing the other half of the people to think another way with our media.

Destroying the planet to make disposable cell phones.

Surrounding ourselves with so many unsustainable bubbles and Ponzi schemes that the American Dollar has become a Ponzi scheme itself.

While we're at it, sure, 9/11 too.

And about a billion other stupid dumbass things that are done every single day.



I think that the people running the show either have no freakin' clue what they're doing at all, or everything is so convoluted on purpose that you'd never be able to figure out who or why. About anything.



Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 6, 2019 2:43 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


A couple of decades ago, I came to a conclusion. Except for sociopaths (and everyday sociopaths), everybody has to tell themselves a story to make a heinous act 'right'. What was OJ Simpson telling himself? No real man would stand for this?

Narrative is what we tell ourselves that lets us do the things we do - like destroying the planet to make disposable cell phones. Or I should say, that we've been taught to tell ourselves to keep us from changing things.

Why do Americans put up with the ultra-wealthy running the whole show and hoovering up the benefits? It's always been that way. It's human nature. Survival of the fittest. Since anybody can make it, it must just be me that's a failure.

If we can ferret out our most basic narratives, and see who benefits and who's suppressed, I think we'd be able to figure out which strata are running the show.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 6, 2019 3:26 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I think what you're saying is ... don't agree with "the story". Don't DISagree with "the story". Understand what the story is, and take a more "meta" view?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 6, 2019 3:48 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Understand what are our most basic stories - and see who they benefit in order to figure out who has the power.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 6, 2019 8:56 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
A couple of decades ago, I came to a conclusion. Except for sociopaths (and everyday sociopaths), everybody has to tell themselves a story to make a heinous act 'right'. What was OJ Simpson telling himself? No real man would stand for this?



Maybe his heart was just broken. It's hard to compare extra-marital affairs to a decade's long international CIA campaign to do... well... whatever their end-game of all of this crazy and certainly calculated shit they've been doing.

Quote:

Narrative is what we tell ourselves that lets us do the things we do - like destroying the planet to make disposable cell phones. Or I should say, that we've been taught to tell ourselves to keep us from changing things.


If these mysterious people really are up on the top running the show, the fact that we are very likely destroying the planet would have to mean one of several different things. (Feel free to add to this list):

1. They really have no clue what they're doing or any long term plan (How do you rule when everyone else is dead? Who wants to rule a dead planet?)

2. They are really aliens of the "The Arrival" variety. The Charlie Sheen version, where Ron Silver was the face of the alien race that was doing everything we do to change our environment to something that was like what they had on their destroyed home planet, and would also kill us.

3. They know a lot more about all of this than we do and they STRONGLY believe that there would be time to reverse the changes after they pulled off Agenda 21 (or whatever they're calling it now. Agenda 2030?). That or these changes won't matter when most of the people on the planet aren't here anymore and they can continue to live just as we always have on a smaller scale and the environment can also heal itself at that point.

4. They know a lot more about all of this than we do and it turns out we're not actually doing anything harmful to the environment in the long run and everything we're seeing now is mere coincidence that fits a narrative.

5. They know a lot more than we do and we've got some sort of unavoidable asteroid heading our way (or some other unavoidable cataclysmic event) in they somewhat near future and they're just going to live it up while they can. Why bother telling any of us if this was the case? Ignorance is bliss.

6. .... I know I had more. Lost my train of thought.

Quote:

Why do Americans put up with the ultra-wealthy running the whole show and hoovering up the benefits? It's always been that way. It's human nature. Survival of the fittest. Since anybody can make it, it must just be me that's a failure.


Zipf's law.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipf%27s_law

Quote:

Zipf's law is an empirical law formulated using mathematical statistics. The law is named after the linguist George Kingsley Zipf, who first proposed it.

Zipf's law states that given a large sample of words used, the frequency of any word is inversely proportional to its rank in the frequency table. So word number n has a frequency proportional to 1/n.

Thus the most frequent word will occur about twice as often as the second most frequent word, three times as often as the third most frequent word, etc. For example, in one sample of words in the English language, the most frequently occurring word, "the", accounts for nearly 7% of all the words (69,971 out of slightly over 1 million). True to Zipf's Law, the second-place word "of" accounts for slightly over 3.5% of words (36,411 occurrences), followed by "and" (28,852). Only about 135 words are needed to account for half the sample of words in a large sample.

The same relationship occurs in many other rankings, unrelated to language, such as the population ranks of cities in various countries, corporation sizes, income rankings, etc. The appearance of the distribution in rankings of cities by population was first noticed by Felix Auerbach in 1913.

It is not known why Zipf's law holds for most languages.



(You should watch this video. It's AMAZING.)



Quote:

If we can ferret out our most basic narratives, and see who benefits and who's suppressed, I think we'd be able to figure out which strata are running the show.


I still don't think that's possible. You're talking 7.5 Billion people on the planet. If you wanted to talk about the "1%", as bad as a lot of Americans in the bottom half have it, in most cases they're doing better off than almost anybody else on the planet that isn't on the rich end themselves.

There's just far too many factors. Who would be considered an "insider"? Is it based off of your current net worth? Do you get a commemorative plaque stating that you're part of the evil crew running the show once you bank a certain amount of dollars? Or are you just born into it, and the conspiracy theories about the Rocafellers are true?

These people can hide in plain sight. You never hear about them, other than murmerings from people who drove themselves nuts going down too many rabbit holes. I'd imagine a president like Trump is EXACTLY what they would want. Even when he isn't making a tweet that dominates the news for a day or even a week or more, the MSM can't get enough of dumping on the guy constantly and just avoiding even talking about world news. It's been like that for 2 1/2 years now.

Even before Trump, the faces of presidents become the face of what people like or don't like about the world at the time, depending on where they lie on the scale. They take all the praise when things go well, but more often than not, they get all the hate when things don't go well. I'd imagine that if there truly were people in charge behind the scenes, they don't care at all about any missed out accolades that these presidents get.



I guess the only other thing I'd have to add here is that these people would probably be among the only people who are smart enough and have almost infinite resources at their disposal to think FAR out into the future with their plans. The rest of us, including every politician we've ever had from city alderman to the President, have been trained to think in 4 year blocks.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 6, 2019 10:41 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
If these mysterious people really are up on the top running the show, the fact that we are very likely destroying the planet would have to mean one of several different things. (Feel free to add to this list):
1. They really have no clue what they're doing or any long term plan (How do you rule when everyone else is dead? Who wants to rule a dead planet?)
2. They are really aliens of the "The Arrival" variety. The Charlie Sheen version, where Ron Silver was the face of the alien race that was doing everything we do to change our environment to something that was like what they had on their destroyed home planet, and would also kill us.
3. They know a lot more about all of this than we do and they STRONGLY believe that there would be time to reverse the changes after they pulled off Agenda 21 (or whatever they're calling it now. Agenda 2030?). That or these changes won't matter when most of the people on the planet aren't here anymore and they can continue to live just as we always have on a smaller scale and the environment can also heal itself at that point.
4. They know a lot more about all of this than we do and it turns out we're not actually doing anything harmful to the environment in the long run and everything we're seeing now is mere coincidence that fits a narrative.
5. They know a lot more than we do and we've got some sort of unavoidable asteroid heading our way (or some other unavoidable cataclysmic event) in they somewhat near future and they're just going to live it up while they can. Why bother telling any of us if this was the case? Ignorance is bliss.
6. .... I know I had more. Lost my train of thought.

Archeology tells us that Easter Island was a lush place, with docile animals, rich fertile soil, and filled with a unique species of tall stately palm tree (now extinct) that among other things was used to build the large canoes that could get past the reefs and fish in the teeming deep water. But those palm trees were also cut down to move the stones to make the moai, that were erected in a game of one-up-man ship among the powerful.
But once the animals were hunted to extinction, and the palm tress were cut down and could no longer protect the soil from the wind, the island was stripped bare, and life devolved into cannibalism and hiding in caves.

Now Easter Island is a barren wind-swept desert with scant indigenous life, and no palm trees for boats.

The question has been posed: what did the man who cut down the last palm tree tell himself?

Just because you're powerful doesn't mean you're smart.

Quote:

Why do Americans put up with the ultra-wealthy running the whole show and hoovering up the benefits? It's always been that way. It's human nature. Survival of the fittest. Since anybody can make it, it must just be me that's a failure.
Quote:


Zipf's law.
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipf%27s_law

Newton is credited with having figured out gravity. He didn't really, which isn't to take away what he did. He posited a thing called 'force'. And he came up with a calculation that describes how objects move under a force, F = ma (force = mass x acceleration). And he said that gravity is a universal force that pulls masses together with a force of mutual attraction. But he didn't explain what gravity is. Zipf's law seems like F = ma, a calculation that more or less quantitates a phenomenon but doesn't explain it.
Quote:

There's just far too many factors. Who would be considered an "insider"? Is it based off of your current net worth? Do you get a commemorative plaque stating that you're part of the evil crew running the show once you bank a certain amount of dollars? Or are you just born into it, and the conspiracy theories about the Rockefellers are true?
You're thinking that they're a group, that gets together in the Bohemian Grove to annually plot how to run the world. Instead, I believe they're a product of an impersonal process that willy-nilly gives them immense power. Though they do get together at Davos to stress about the economy and check out who has the biggest and mostest jets.
Quote:

... the faces of presidents become the face of what people like or don't like about the world at the time, depending on where they lie on the scale.
And there you have the distinction between the visible government and the Deep State.
Quote:

I guess the only other thing I'd have to add here is that these people would probably be among the only people who are smart enough and have almost infinite resources at their disposal to think FAR out into the future with their plans.
Smart has nothing to do with it.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 6, 2019 8:41 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
You're thinking that they're a group, that gets together in the Bohemian Grove to annually plot how to run the world. Instead, I believe they're a product of an impersonal process that willy-nilly gives them immense power. Though they do get together at Davos to stress about the economy and check out who has the biggest and mostest jets.



Could be they do. Could be they get together at Epstien's Pedophile Island instead of Bohemian Grove. Maybe they meet once a month at the local McDonalds for coffee and free refills. They probably don't have to do any of that anymore with the internet.

Quote:

Smart has nothing to do with it.


It could, though it doesn't have to.

I did outline the idea that none of them have any idea what they're doing at all in one of my scenarios above.

I just don't really believe that's the case. I don't see any point in ruling the world if it's a dead one. But then again, I'd never be able to understand their mindset. I don't have an ambitious bone in my body.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 7, 2019 6:59 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
But then again, I'd never be able to understand their mindset. I don't have an ambitious bone in my body.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Ambition has nothing to do with it, either!

Most people got their wealth the good old-fashioned way - they inherited it!

'The system' is set up so that owners accrue wealth, mere workers (who create value) have it sucked out of them. That alone accounts for the vast majority of the rich v poor divide. Smart or not. Ambitious or not. It just happens.

And the idea you seem to have that with all their wealth to protect, and all their power to do that with - they would be zen and just let the world unfold before them as it will - it just doesn't make sense.

I don't know what goes through their minds either, but I saw a documentary that gave me a glimpse.

And you and I - we're both so far down on the scale of wealth we're on the same tier. These people spend more before breakfast - without bothering to even estimate the bills - than you and I make in a year.

Anyway, ownership begets wealth, wealth begets power, power begets more wealth, and so on.

I'm just curious WHO they are. I've heard so many versions - including PN's jewsih-anglo-rothschild-knightstemplar ... I don't remember what all else he mixed in the stew! The most recent thing I've heard is it's the financialists in 'The City of London', not to be confused with London, England, the city.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 7, 2019 9:26 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


I'd have to imagine that there at least has to be some intelligence and ambition behind it. Sure... the puppeteers that are alive today are at least several generations removed from those ambitious and intelligent enough to take it all for themselves initially, but without having to adhere to any sort of arbitrary rules of giving their "empire" to the first born, I'm sure they had a lot of kids and the ones who weren't going to be any good were stiffed, or let's face it, likely "suicided" along the way.

Sure, it's easy for me to judge and say that I'd never be able to do anything that was necessary to be "on top", but then again, I'm speaking and acting from 40 years of life experience that couldn't be any further from what a 40 year old born into one of the families was. I think the question of nature vs. nurture is just as valid here as it is anywhere else. Maybe I'd be ruthless as a 40 year old in 2019 if my last name was Rockafeller.


As silly as it sounds too, you can't discount the possibility that those running the show aren't human either. I don't know what the actual probabilities would be that we could have been "visited" by another species at some point in history, but if we ever faced beings with such technology (especially hundreds or even thousands of years ago), their knowledge and true abilities to this day would seem like magic to us.

Though not a very likely scenario, it can't just be thrown out the window. Maybe the species running the show right now is not an inherently violent race and prefers to let us destroy ourselves with their guidance? Maybe overpopulation and environment destruction is something they had planned on purpose for whatever their end goals were?


Hell... Maybe life on earth is Hell? Or purgatory? Or a simulation?



I envy your thirst for knowledge, but I don't envy this path you're taking, should you choose to go down it. Smarter people than us have tried to figure it all out before, and I don't think they end up on the right side of the sanity scale the deeper they go into it. I'd imagine if somehow the day comes that you figure it all out, it would literally turn the world on it's head (in your mind) and nothing would ever be the same. All the while, nobody in the world would ever even believe you. Including your family.

I think, probably for our own sanity and safety, there are hundreds or possibly thousands of layers to peel away before you could ever uncover who is actually running the show. And if you ever actually did, you probably wouldn't have to worry about nobody believing you because you'd probably have an "accident" long before you were ever able to show any real proof about it to anybody else.

I guess my only suggestion for you going forward is not to underestimate your adversary here. I think it's probably a mistake to go into this thinking that there is no intelligence or ambition behind it and those that are in control today are only there because of sheer dumb luck by winning the genetic lottery.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 9, 2019 10:33 AM

CAPTAINCRUNCH

... stay crunchy...


That's it? Seems like a half baked thread for people who hate all rich people. What do you people think these people actually do?? What does "run the show" even mean? Force people to eat McDonald's and watch bad tv?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, July 10, 2019 7:26 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Nah. I've known "rich" people in my life.

The type of people we're talking about piss on the most rich people you or I have ever known in our lives.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Wed, April 24, 2024 20:12 - 2302 posts
Scientific American Claims It Is "Misinformation" That There Are Just Two Sexes
Wed, April 24, 2024 20:02 - 2 posts
Case against Sidney Powell, 2020 case lawyer, is dismissed
Wed, April 24, 2024 19:58 - 12 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, April 24, 2024 19:57 - 3557 posts
Grifter Donald Trump Has Been Indicted And Yes Arrested; Four Times Now And Counting. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Wed, April 24, 2024 09:04 - 804 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Wed, April 24, 2024 08:57 - 6296 posts
Slate: I Changed My Mind About Kids and Phones. I Hope Everyone Else Does, Too.
Tue, April 23, 2024 19:38 - 2 posts
No Thread On Topic, More Than 17 Days After Hamas Terrorists Invade, Slaughter Innocent Israelis?
Tue, April 23, 2024 19:19 - 26 posts
Pardon Me? Michael Avenatti Flips, Willing To Testify On Trump's Behalf
Tue, April 23, 2024 19:01 - 9 posts
FACTS
Mon, April 22, 2024 20:10 - 552 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Mon, April 22, 2024 17:47 - 1010 posts
I agree with everything you said, but don't tell anyone I said that
Mon, April 22, 2024 16:15 - 16 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL