REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

new deadly human-to-human-transmissible coronavirus emerges out of China

POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Thursday, October 12, 2023 02:05
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 116024
PAGE 43 of 57

Monday, August 10, 2020 2:30 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


So I FINALLY found a couple of links to all the 'studies' that show positive *chloroquine* results.

I reviewed about 30 from the first link, some used chloroquine phosphate, some hydroxychloroquine, and some weren't specific, so I'm not specifying any kind og chloroquine.

I haven't looked at the second link yet.

https://c19study.com/

This first link is very user-friendly. If you click on the color coded words (negative, positive, meta, etc) it expands the related listing. At the bottom left of the expanded listing is the word 'Source'. If you click on that it'll take you to the webpage that the listing was drawn from. I went past the 'Theory', 'In Vitro', 'Meta', 'Review', etc listing and went straight to the 'Positive' ones. I reviewed 20 of the early 'Positive' listings, and I have to say they were a disappointment. Virtually none of them were published clinical studies. They were discussions, newspaper stories, a few pre-prints, etc, but not published clinical studies.

So I went to the last 10 'Positive' listings, 7 were published, 2 were pre-prints, and 1 was a newspaper interview. But to get to 10 'Positive' results I had to go through '2 Negative' '3 Meta' '4 Inconclusive', and '2 In Vitro'. This isn't exactly a ringing endorsement. I just want to mention it because it's easy to get carried away with cherry-picked information.

I haven't looked at this link yet.

https://www.peakprosperity.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/hcqstudiesbi
blio.pdf




Some day I'm going to look more deeply into this topic.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 2:38 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


AS USUAL JACK, you posted no links.

Just more of your Karen hyperventilation and bullshit over your precious sense of entitlement.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 3:49 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:

You're talking about giving the government the power to shut off water to people.
All I did was point out that the police and code enforcement ALREADY have that authority and have had it for a long time.
This is nothing new.
I'm sorry if that's too much reality for you.

I apologize to everyone for starting a thread to keep up with facts about SARS-COV-2, and driving JACK over the edge with too much reality.



No. They do not have the authority to come in and turn off your power and your water service if they don't approve of your activity.

Some shady as fuck lawyers working for him might have convinced this power-hungry mayor that this is the case, but existing laws regarding abandoned buildings and crack dens do not extend to tax paying citizens who are paying for these services and give the government authority to shut off your source of life on their own personal whims.

We have a legal system for a reason. If somebody is doing something that authorities deem illegal, they need to get a warrant. Then they can make any arrests within the confines of the law. Then they get their day in court where a jury of their peers decide the outcome.


This is an extreme abuse of power, and the fact that you're cheerleading it because you're terrified says a lot about you.

You're the reason the slippery slope exists.

You better check yourself.


Do Right, Be Right. :)

Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
AS USUAL JACK, you posted no links.

Just more of your Karen hyperventilation and bullshit over your precious sense of entitlement.



I don't need to post links to illustrate how you've sold out freedom and our country because of your feels.

I can just quote you here.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 3:57 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Your real name isn't Danielle, is it Kiki?

https://www.ibtimes.com/danielle-becomes-new-karen-after-kroger-store-
incident-3025036




Happy ending. "Target Tori" started a gofundme campaign to raise money to send this dude on a vacation. It currently sits just under $20,000.



Karens are terrible. Mask Karens are the absolute worst.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 6:15 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So, I'm still trying to resolve the huge discrepancy between "deaths" and "cases", especially since the curves wind up going in opposite directions.



But at the beginning, nobody knew the virus was circulating, so they went on cruises and traveled internationally and went to sporting events and work and the gym. I can't see why vulnerable elderly in care homes would be exposed to the virus in SUCH far greater proportions than the rest of the population. True, they're in a mass situation and cared for by low-wage workers who HAVE to work, sick or not. OTOH they're not out working, partying, demonstrating, attending church or sporting events, like others were at the start of the pandemic.

Although many factors are intersecting, remember that, as result of Obamination forcing these workers to wrok less than 30 hours per week at each place, they need to work 2-3 jobs doing the same thing, going from one Care Facility to another - so, in effect, these Nursing Homes are really part of a network of others, all staffed by the same employees who must work when sick.
No other facet of the cases profile duplicates this problem.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 6:19 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The test for "how many cases is SARS-Cov2 testing revealing" is the positivity rate. Apparently there are statistics in use that indicate whether testing is revealing the true infection rate, and that is the positivity rate. I have heard one point referenced: a positivity rate of less than 5% indicates that most infections are being captured. I don't know if they have more points that indicate how many more infections "out there" for different positivity rates.

Positivity defined as total number of new positive resulted cases for the day divided by the total number of stated test results for the day. Not to be confused with specimens.

This seems to be more a function of how the test subjects are targeted than the degree of saturation.

I think total number of new positives divided by the total of testing CAPACITY is a more useful gauge to measure saturation level, or what has been missed.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 6:40 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by JACKAREN:
MORE TROLLING FROM THE TROLL



fify

I apologize to everyone for starting a thread to keep up with facts about SARS-COV-2, and driving JACKAREN over the edge with too much reality.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 10:11 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:

Originally posted by JACKAREN:
MORE TROLLING FROM THE TROLL



fify

I apologize to everyone for starting a thread to keep up with facts about SARS-COV-2, and driving JACKAREN over the edge with too much reality.




I don't need to post links to illustrate how you've sold out freedom and our country because of your feels.

I can just quote you here.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 11:24 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The test for "how many cases is SARS-Cov2 testing revealing" is the positivity rate. Apparently there are statistics in use that indicate whether testing is revealing the true infection rate, and that is the positivity rate. I have heard one point referenced: a positivity rate of less than 5% indicates that most infections are being captured. I don't know if they have more points that indicate how many more infections "out there" for different positivity rates.

JSF: Positivity defined as total number of new positive resulted cases for the day divided by the total number of stated test results for the day. Not to be confused with specimens.

This seems to be more a function of how the test subjects are targeted than the degree of saturation.

I think total number of new positives divided by the total of testing CAPACITY is a more useful gauge to measure saturation level, or what has been missed.

what do you mean by "testing capacity"?

You bring up an interesting point: most of the stats are performed with the idea that testing is either geared towards symptomatic people or random. You COULD game the system by targeting people who are not at all symptomatic and who have NO history of potential exposure, run a crap ton of tests, have very low positivity and low apparent numbers and be deliberately missing a huge number of new cases. IF you wanted to have the system and look like you're doing better than youo really are, that's how it could be done. Of course, you'd need a lot of participating doctors, nurses, and techs, and someone somewhere would blow the whistle



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 11:36 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


So I went to the website of HCQ studies and encountered maybe a different looking home page than you.

The studies are divided into PREP (preexposure prophylaxis), PEP (post exposure prophylaxis), early, and late ( self explanatory). The PREP studies that pop up first are mostly positive. Positive results are found in India, Spain, and China. These are not double blind placebo controlled so one does not know how many people would have contracted the disease without HCQ, but presumably there are similar hospitals and staff for comparison

Thanks for the link!



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 11:43 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


I looked at the ~ALL~ category.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 10, 2020 11:48 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


One thing that Martenson had been harping on is that HCQ has to be given EARLY. ASAP or right after exposure if possible , bc of the drug is acting like an antiviral you have to give it before the virus had a change to replicate. So I'm ignoring the latter studies as they make no sense

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 12:30 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


I was looking thru the sources because I was hoping to get a sense of what do 'people' claim it's good for ... and what might readers understand from it. A fair number say 'chloroquine' (various forms) is good for the severely ill.

Anyway, I can see that taking perhaps a lower dose early on could be far more helpful than than trying to pull someone back who's already in the throes of cytokine storm, rampant micro-clotting, kidney failure and so on.

I'm going to take a look at the dates in that list, and keep an eye out for more recent, more appropriate studies. I'm still waiting for the final word on it.

Personally I wouldn't recommend taking it prophylactically just in case you might run into SARS-CoV-2 someday. There really are side effects and you might just be someone who's sensitive to it. Though people at high risk for exposure could see some benefit.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 9:08 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


I was curious about Trump's 6,000 attendee rally in Tulsa as a potential superspreader event. If you look at 91-DIVOC for Oklahoma, 'new cases' did go up significantly since then, but not in a distinct bump 2-4 weeks out like you might expect. Though this article links Trump's rally and 'new cases'. https://bgr.com/2020/07/09/coronavirus-cases-trump-rally-spike-tulsa-o
klahoma
/

What might be more interesting is the Sturgis, South Dakota Harley rally, which is still going on, expected to draw ~250,000. I couldn't find any even preliminary attendance numbers yet.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 9:09 AM

REAVERFAN



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 12:02 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:

You're talking about giving the government the power to shut off water to people.
All I did was point out that the police and code enforcement ALREADY have that authority and have had it for a long time.
This is nothing new.
I'm sorry if that's too much reality for you.

I apologize to everyone for starting a thread to keep up with facts about SARS-COV-2, and driving JACK over the edge with too much reality.



No. They do not have the authority to come in and turn off your power and your water service if they don't approve of your activity.

Some shady as fuck lawyers working for him might have convinced this power-hungry mayor that this is the case, but existing laws regarding abandoned buildings and crack dens do not extend to tax paying citizens who are paying for these services and give the government authority to shut off your source of life on their own personal whims.

We have a legal system for a reason. If somebody is doing something that authorities deem illegal, they need to get a warrant. Then they can make any arrests within the confines of the law. Then they get their day in court where a jury of their peers decide the outcome.


This is an extreme abuse of power, and the fact that you're cheerleading it because you're terrified says a lot about you.

You're the reason the slippery slope exists.

You better check yourself.


Do Right, Be Right. :)

Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
AS USUAL JACK, you posted no links.

Just more of your Karen hyperventilation and bullshit over your precious sense of entitlement.



I don't need to post links to illustrate how you've sold out freedom and our country because of your feels.

I can just quote you here.

Do Right, Be Right. :)







Here's a few links for you, dummy...

https://ktla.com/news/local-news/police-union-comes-out-against-garcet
tis-plan-to-shut-off-utilities-at-l-a-house-parties
/

http://archive.vn/cjkiV



Quote:

“Mayor Garcetti wants to reimagine policing. He should send his civilian staff to turn off people’s electricity & cut off their water,” the League said in a tweet over the weekend in response to the mayor’s plans. “Let officers deal with the rise in shootings and killings in LA. We need a leader and not a political contortionist,”


Sorry Karen. Doesn't look like the cops are down with following orders from the fascist mayor of LA.

Better put on three masks when you go out today.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 1:53 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by JACKAREN
POINTLESS DRIVEL


fify

BTW, nobody is disputing that the city has the authority.

I apologize to everyone for starting a thread to keep up with facts about SARS-COV-2, and driving JACK over the edge with too much reality.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 2:52 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The test for "how many cases is SARS-Cov2 testing revealing" is the positivity rate. Apparently there are statistics in use that indicate whether testing is revealing the true infection rate, and that is the positivity rate. I have heard one point referenced: a positivity rate of less than 5% indicates that most infections are being captured. I don't know if they have more points that indicate how many more infections "out there" for different positivity rates.

JSF: Positivity defined as total number of new positive resulted cases for the day divided by the total number of stated test results for the day. Not to be confused with specimens.

This seems to be more a function of how the test subjects are targeted than the degree of saturation.

I think total number of new positives divided by the total of testing CAPACITY is a more useful gauge to measure saturation level, or what has been missed.

what do you mean by "testing capacity"?

You bring up an interesting point: most of the stats are performed with the idea that testing is either geared towards symptomatic people or random. You COULD game the system by targeting people who are not at all symptomatic and who have NO history of potential exposure, run a crap ton of tests, have very low positivity and low apparent numbers and be deliberately missing a huge number of new cases. IF you wanted to have the system and look like you're doing better than youo really are, that's how it could be done. Of course, you'd need a lot of participating doctors, nurses, and techs, and someone somewhere would blow the whistle

By testing capacity I mean the number of test possible on a given day, as stated by the State authority (if you can believe them).
I don't know if other states provide this info, but WI started a month or so ago.

In my Backlog thread, I do have a column for this data, although not all of that data is populated in the column, yet.
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=63703&mid=11037
98#1103798


This page, towards the bottom, shows the current day's capacity, and number of labs contributing to that total. They now have a chart to show what capacities were on given days in the past couple months, which may or may not be the same figures whch were stated on those specific days.
New in the past week or 2 is a chart right below that which shows the number of SPECIMENS for each day. Prior to this, no specimen data was available. Be careful about analyzing this chart, for there were many days when the specimens were less than 1/4 of the testing capacity, but persistent reports of backlogged tests at labs continued for weeks.

https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/covid-19/data.htm

Difference between "test results" and "specimens": Specimens is really what the capacity was trying to convey. Test results are different. If a positive specimen result is the first test for a case (person), then I don't think that is counted as positive, until a second positive specimen confirms the first, whereupon is is reported as a positive test result. It must certainly not be counted as a negative result.
Once 2 specimens have been tested to confirm a positive case, then at least 2 more consecutive specimens must test negative before being declared recovered. And if more specimens are tested during "active" period, then these positives would nt be counted in either category of positive or negative.
So, non-cases which test negative (only once) are recorded as a negative test result, one per each specimen.
But positive cases require at least 4 specimens (and perhaps 7 or 8) to be tested during the course of the case, which would be reported as one positive.
So a day with almost all negative test results is fairly close to being an accurate read of how close to the capacity the testing volume is. But on days with a large portion of positive results, it can be difficult to know if the testing capacity has been exceeded or not, which is in effect the same problem as "not enough tests" or not enough testing, etc. These are hiding the true extent of spread, and not being transparent about it.


Targeting or focus of test subjects.
You proposed a more nefarious and coordinated example of manipulating the focus.

But consider this less devious scenario: Some positive is detected in a nursing home, the first in that location. Next day a bunch more tests are taken, and as we now know, those will have a pile of positives. The next day, all remaining residents of that facility are tested, again with a pile of positives. Next, contact tracing indicates family members, and such from outside the facility will be tested, and most likely the positive results will be vastly lower than what came out of the Home.
I recall some days when my county had reported hundreds of tests, but something like 5 were negative (when we found 3 meatpacking plants had spread asymptomatic cases widely). Same template applies - 1 person found positive, next test the half dozen coworkers in his/her work are, then test everybody in the facility, then the families of all of those positives (or those who may have already turned negative, but their families are still in the throes.


I have also seen days when gobs of tests were reported, they could not find enough people to test to soak up the capacity for testing, and yet the results were paltry level of positives. If the capacity of specimens tested was actually being stressed or stretched, then the true extent of the spread is not as transparent as might be assumed from looking at the "positivity rate" rather than by dividing by the capacity. Usin a reference of capacity is not really as easy, simple, and intuitive, but it is still better if we look at the correct data and reference rather than the wrong or misleading data which looks nice - whic I have seen many people wander down the garden path because of.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 5:56 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:

Originally posted by JACKAREN
POINTLESS DRIVEL


fify

BTW, nobody is disputing that the city has the authority.

I apologize to everyone for starting a thread to keep up with facts about SARS-COV-2, and driving JACK over the edge with too much reality.



The Constitution is disputing the city has the authority.

You're a useful idiot.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 8:01 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.




Signy, I don't know if you have any interest in- or feelings about- herd immunity, but San Quentin is by all accounts a lesson in how it doesn't work.


San Quentin's coronavirus outbreak shows why 'herd immunity' could mean disaster


COVID-19 spread unchecked across California's oldest prison in ways that stunned public health experts, despite efforts to control the disease. As of Monday, there had been more than 2,200 cases and 25 deaths, among a population of more than 3,260 people. On Sunday, a guard became one of the latest to die.

That means more than two-thirds of the prison's population has been infected, said Dr. George Rutherford, epidemiologist and infectious diseases expert at UC San Francisco.

And though new cases have slowed, they are still occurring — with 60 reported in the last two weeks — suggesting herd immunity has not yet been achieved.

... the San Quentin experience — as well as other data — does show that, in the absence of a vaccine, "in order to get to something that approaches herd immunity, we're going to have to get something well on the far side of 50% of people infected," Rutherford said. "Which comes with a resultant large cost in mortality and severe morbidity.

Other data show how it's possible for far larger proportions of the population to get infected.

Among three slums in Mumbai, India, 57% of people tested have been exposed to the coronavirus, according to the BBC, citing a survey conducted by government officials. On a cruise ship with 217 passengers that left Argentina in March bound for Antartica, 59% tested positive for the virus, according to a study published in the journal Thorax.

Even nations that have previously been seen as hard hit still have plenty of susceptible people to fuel a second wave of disease.


https://news.yahoo.com/san-quentin-coronavirus-disaster-exposes-120059
867.html



And winter's coming.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 8:16 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:


Signy, I don't know if you have any interest in- or feelings about- herd immunity, but San Quentin is by all accounts a lesson in how it doesn't work.


https://news.yahoo.com/san-quentin-coronavirus-disaster-exposes-120059
867.html


COVID-19 spread unchecked across California's oldest prison in ways that stunned public health experts, despite efforts to control the disease. As of Monday, there had been more than 2,200 cases and 25 deaths, among a population of more than 3,260 people. On Sunday, a guard became one of the latest to die.

That means more than two-thirds of the prison's population has been infected, said Dr. George Rutherford, epidemiologist and infectious diseases expert at UC San Francisco.

And though new cases have slowed, they are still occurring — with 60 reported in the last two weeks — suggesting herd immunity has not yet been achieved.

... the San Quentin experience — as well as other data — does show that, in the absence of a vaccine, "in order to get to something that approaches herd immunity, we're going to have to get something well on the far side of 50% of people infected," Rutherford said. "Which comes with a resultant large cost in mortality and severe morbidity.

Other data show how it's possible for far larger proportions of the population to get infected.

Among three slums in Mumbai, India, 57% of people tested have been exposed to the coronavirus, according to the BBC, citing a survey conducted by government officials. On a cruise ship with 217 passengers that left Argentina in March bound for Antartica, 59% tested positive for the virus, according to a study published in the journal Thorax.

Even nations that have previously been seen as hard hit still have plenty of susceptible people to fuel a second wave of disease.


So maybe this "second pathway" of immunity is a phantasm.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 9:37 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


The San Quentin problem is bullshit.

First off, to try to compare prison life as a microcosm of everybody else's life in the real world is a joke. Those people eat, sleep and jerk off with each other. You couldn't possibly find a better place to spread a highly contagious disease than a prison.


But more importantly, it looks like whoever wrote this trash piece is either forgetting or purposefully leaving out incubation and infectious periods, as well as how the rate of infection grows exponentially as more people become infected.


Rather convenient.



1. Covid was going to spread faster to a higher percentage of the population of a prison than it ever would in the real world.

2. Herd immunity doesn't work when nobody is yet immune.


By the time they were reaching 50% immunity nearly everybody had already been infected, many of those infected by people who were now immune.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 10:09 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.



Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So maybe this "second pathway" of immunity is a phantasm.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

Or it's a minor component. I was looking across 91-DIVOC to see if there was a natural maximum in either cases or infections, but didn't find anything.

The San Quentin rates are both so much higher than anything I found on 91-DIVOC, they render 91-DIVOC moot.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 12, 2020 9:23 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


I just wanted to explain how I got where I got in terms of thinking, since I almost never make it explicit. Originally there was the thought that we needed a herd immunity of about 80%. Then it dropped to (maybe) as low as 20-25% because, as was thought, either exposure to other coronaviruses or general immune system activation from completely unrelated infections and vaccinations would cover a significant portion of people.

So I started looking for either infection or death rate maximums in 91-DIVOC, to see if there was a natural plateau above which rates didn't rise, for any reason. Which I didn't find btw.

The San Quentin data renders anything one might possibly find in 91-DIVOC moot, as well as, more importantly imo, the theory that herd immunity can be low.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 12, 2020 12:01 PM

REAVERFAN




Authorized by the Department for Sacrificing School Teachers to the Great Bull God to Make Line Go Up

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 12, 2020 4:37 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


It occurs to me that there is one other possible explanation for the discrepancy between deaths and cases, and that is that people wearing masks might still be exposed to SARS-Cov2, but at a much lower particle load. So possibly y they are able to fend off the virus more easily than those who get a whole lungful.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 12, 2020 5:28 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Has that ever been a factor before? Do people get a lesser flu because somebody sneezed near them rather than on them?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 12, 2020 10:06 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
It occurs to me that there is one other possible explanation for the discrepancy between deaths and cases, and that is that people wearing masks might still be exposed to SARS-CoV-2, but at a much lower particle load. So possibly they are able to fend off the virus more easily than those who get a whole lungful.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

Is this still focused on Sweden? I don't think Sweden has a mask mandate, or even a suggestion, but I could be wrong.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 13, 2020 3:16 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.




Quote:

New Zealand was acclaimed a world leader in handling Covid-19. Now it's dealing with a fresh outbreak


For months, life was largely back to normal, and the country went 102 days without a locally acquired case.

But on Tuesday, New Zealand reported that a family of four in Auckland had been infected with coronavirus, despite having no history of overseas travel and no connection with any known cases. (Then) On Thursday, New Zealand's Director General of Health Dr. Ashley Bloomfield announced 13 new locally transmitted cases, all connected with the original four. The new cluster (of locally transmitted infections), which now totals 17 cases, has prompted the country to put its most populous city under lockdown as authorities scramble to trace the source of the outbreak.

It remains unclear what caused the latest outbreak. Authorities have used genome sequencing to investigate the source of the outbreak, but have found no link between the community cases and imported cases in New Zealand's managed isolation quarantine facilities, Bloomfield said. "What we do know is that the genome sequence of the new cases broadly most closely resemble the patterns from the United Kingdom and Australia," he said.

One of the original four worked at Americold, an American temperature-controlled warehouse company. On Thursday, authorities announced that three more Americold staff members had tested positive, and seven of the cases announced Thursday are family members of Americold employees. Authorities are testing surfaces at Americold's warehouse for Covid-19, but Ardern emphasized that the most likely cause of the outbreak was human-to-human transmission. "We are wanting to rule everything out," she said.

(edited to put information in a logical sequence)

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/13/asia/new-zealand-cases-coronavirus-
intl-hnk/index.html




NZ has so few cases they have a prayer of tracking each outbreak back to a source. If NZ can track back the source of this outbreak, they might uncover a entirely new mode of transmission.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 13, 2020 3:45 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.



oops

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 13, 2020 3:51 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Signy, when it comes to the disconnect between cases and deaths, fwiw I checked the US. When you look at 91-DIVOC overall, it looks like the US has the exact same disconnect as Sweden. But when you go state-by-state, for the vast majority, deaths rise after cases rise (I only saw 3 exceptions to date, though some states had recent cases spikes and haven't had a chance for deaths to show up yet).

In terms of variation between states, for one thing the rise in cases in the states happens over a broad span of start-times. And then there's a variable time lapse between cases and deaths - in some states it takes only 1.5 weeks for deaths to start rising, in other states it take 5 weeks, though most fall in between at 3.5-4 weeks. And while many states have proportional rises - eg a 4x rise in cases leads to a 4x rise in deaths - in a large minority the increase is deaths is lower - eg a 5x rise in cases leads to a 3x rise in deaths, and in a very few states (2 so far) it's far higher. But despite the individual states being very explicable, when you add the states up, it leads to a very puzzling overall picture.

So perhaps that's going on with Sweden.

Or, maybe other European countries may be telltales about the discrepancy:

Young people are driving a second, less-deadly surge of Covid-19 cases in Europe
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/13/europe/coronavirus-europe-young-peo
ple-cases-spiking-intl/index.html


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 20, 2020 2:10 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"U.S. jobless claims jump back above 1 million in face of coronavirus" - which just goes to prove, you can't have a healthy economy if your citizens are getting sick and dying in large numbers.

Meanwhile, Georgia has the highest per capita cases of any state in the US ... gosh, who could have seen that coming?

And finally ... my opinion ... the things that spread the flu are going to spread COVID-19. We haven't see the last of high numbers for this virus.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 20, 2020 3:59 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I heard this guy being interviewed on KNX 1070. I caught it by chance, as I was simply trying to find out what the column of smoke in the foothills was all about (Azusa fire)

I'm glad I found an article by him

Column: I had COVID-19, and these are the things nobody tells you
Sports columnist Bill Plaschke
Sports columnist Bill Plaschke writes about his bout with the novel coronavirus. Yes, he says, it’s really as bad as you’ve heard.
(Jay L. Clendenin / Los Angeles Times)
By Bill PlaschkeColumnist
Aug. 12, 2020
3:43 PM

It hit me in an inspired bit of irony, at the exact moment I filed my column on the NBA restart opening game between the Lakers and Clippers.

After marveling about the return of the intensity of a live sports event, I literally curled up with the chills.

After celebrating how our local teams renewed their rivalry with exhausted passion, I was so fatigued I could barely walk from my office chair to my bed.

It was a night filled with hope that this country’s long-stalled sports machine was finally chugging its way out of the novel coronavirus pandemic.
Advertisement

It was also the night I began showing symptoms that later resulted in a positive test for COVID-19.

Yeah, I’ve got the ‘Rona. Who’d have guessed? After I spent four months writing about how this nasty incurable coronavirus should shut down the sports world, it laughingly shut me down too. It didn’t care that I respected it. It didn’t matter that I used noted scientists to warn sports fans of its perils.

It was as if my ominous words were lifted from the page and injected directly into my veins. In an instant, my fears for others became prayers for myself.

I picked up COVID-19 at the end of July, tested positive a few days later, suffered through it for about a week, and now am quarantining for the rest of this week while waiting for the danger to pass.
Advertisement

I would occasionally hear acquaintances wonder if [the coronavirus] was truly that awful. I can now offer indisputable confirmation. Yes, it really sucks.

I am lucky. I am blessed. According to the latest numbers, I am one of the around 212,000 confirmed cases in Los Angeles County, but I am not among the around 5,000 deaths, and I had the incredibly good fortune to avoid hospitalization.

I basically lived through a really strange and bad flu. You’ve heard the stories, and mine is actually one of the better ones. Many victims would love to be alive to tell such a relatively benign tale. The depth of their nightmare resonates deeply in me now. This column honors their struggle and commemorates their spirit. May we never forget that behind every coronavirus statistic there is unquantifiable human suffering.

I’m the first person I know who has had the coronavirus. I would occasionally hear acquaintances wonder if it was truly that awful. I can now offer indisputable confirmation. Yes, it really sucks.
Advertisement

My temperature hovered in the upper reaches of 102. It felt like my head was on fire. One night I sweated through five shirts. I shook so much from the chills I thought I chipped a tooth. My chest felt like LeBron James was sitting on it. My fatigue made it feel as if I was dressed in the chains of Jacob Marley’s ghost. I coughed so hard it felt like I broke a rib.
James Goldstein attends the 2018 NBA All-Star Game 2018 at Staples Center.

Sports

Coronavirus has burst NBA bubble of most recognizable L.A. superfan

I would fall asleep in a chair and wake up terrified from a hallucinatory dream where I was chased through a playground by old women with giant heads. During phone calls I would get confused and just stop talking. I would begin crying for no reason. I lost my sense of taste, smell, and five pounds in the first four days.

None of this is probably news to anyone who has read about these cases. Everyone knows what happens, even if they never believe it will happen to them.
Advertisement

But still, there are things about this insidious illness that nobody tells you. There are things that surprised me, things that stick with you long after the fever has spiked and the headaches have stopped.

Nobody tells you about the dread. From the moment my doctor phoned me with the test results, to the moment I am writing this column, I have been scared out of my mind.

I know the minuscule overall fatality percentages. I know the overwhelming odds of survival for a 61-year-old male in good health with no preexisting conditions. It doesn’t matter. Once you realize you have a virus that could kill you and there’s nothing anybody can do about it, you live in constant fear.

A couple of weeks ago, I didn’t follow my instincts. I briefly let my guard down. The coronavirus came out swinging.

Advertisement

With every trickle of sweat off your forehead, you worry. With every deep cough, you wonder. You check your temperature 53 times every day, and every single time that thermometer is in your mouth, you close your eyes and pray. You stick your finger in the pulse oximeter every hour, and beg for the number to rise.

Then there are the late nights, when your quarantine feels most acute — when you are the most alone. You start coughing into a wet pillow and you can’t stop and your breath becomes ragged and your bed is soaking and you wonder, is now the time? Do you try to drive yourself to the hospital? Do you call an ambulance? Are you just being a baby? You can’t call any friends or family for help because they can’t be exposed. You can’t call your doctor because he’s already told you there’s nothing he can do. You don’t know what to do, so you simmer alone in the darkness doing nothing, paralyzed by fear and chasing your breath and praying that 102.1 does not become 103.1.

The other emotion nobody tells you about is the anger. You followed all the rules, you wore countless masks, you never strayed far from home, you spent four months battling this thing, and still it hits you with a sucker punch.

In my social circles, I was considered among the least likely person to contract the disease because, basically, I abandoned the circles. For four months I avoided all crowded driveway happy hours and cul-de-sac cocktail parties. I didn’t set foot inside my church even during the brief time it was open. I didn’t set foot inside a grocery store as my youngest daughter Mary Clare, who was quarantined with me for most of the summer, did all the shopping.
Advertisement

Los Angeles Times Lakers reporter Tania Ganguli gives a look at what life is like inside the NBA bubble at Disney World in Orlando, Fla.

I wore a mask everywhere. I followed all the rules, but a couple of weeks ago I didn’t follow my instincts. I briefly let my guard down. The coronavirus came out swinging.

The weekend before my symptoms appeared, for the first time in four months, I met friends for two dinners at two socially distanced patio tables. Nobody is required to wear masks at the tables, so I removed my mask when I sat, as did my dining partners, and we left them off during the entire time we were at the table.

I didn’t do anything that was prohibited, right? I was just following the rules, right?
Advertisement

My guess is that I caught it there.

I’m angry not at the coronavirus, but at myself, because I should have known it doesn’t fight fair, because I was stupid enough to relax around it for even a second, and now my mistake could fester in my system forever.

Framed against the sports world of which I write, my illness has further convinced me that organized team sports played outside an NBA or NHL-style bubble don’t have a chance this fall.
Members of the Carolina Hurricanes and New York Rangers at the conclusion of their Stanley Cup playoff series Aug. 4.

Hockey

Elliott: NHL continues to adjust on the fly in the COVID-19 era
Advertisement

This is why all of college football should follow the smart Pac-12 and Big Ten conferences and cancel their seasons. This is why the NFL should shut down training camps before they begin practicing in earnest. This is why baseball needs to get into a postseason bubble if it has any chance of crowning a champion.

I’ve written all this before, and so I write it again with feeling. It didn’t take much for COVID-19 to make my unexciting life hell. Imagine the increased risk for someone who actually hits and hugs and huddles and hangs out with other people?

The novel coronavirus is not a statistic. It’s not an agenda. It’s not a debate. COVID-19 is real enough to rise up and beat me senseless. We need to stop giving it license to do the same to others.


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 20, 2020 6:22 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Long story short...

Dude got the virus. Dude didn't need to be hospitalized. Dude is well on his way to recovery. Dude just wasted everybody's time.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 20, 2020 10:46 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 21, 2020 1:37 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I heard this guy being interviewed on KNX 1070. I caught it by chance, as I was simply trying to find out what the column of smoke in the foothills was all about (Azusa fire)

There's been some ashfall where I am. Just enough to muck up the car windows a bit.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 21, 2020 1:46 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Column: I had COVID-19, and these are the things nobody tells you

It hit me in an inspired bit of irony, at the exact moment I filed my column on the NBA restart opening game between the Lakers and Clippers.

After marveling about the return of the intensity of a live sports event, I literally curled up with the chills.

After celebrating how our local teams renewed their rivalry with exhausted passion, I was so fatigued I could barely walk from my office chair to my bed.

It was a night filled with hope that this country’s long-stalled sports machine was finally chugging its way out of the novel coronavirus pandemic.

It was also the night I began showing symptoms that later resulted in a positive test for COVID-19.

I would occasionally hear acquaintances wonder if [the coronavirus] was truly that awful. I can now offer indisputable confirmation. Yes, it really sucks.

I am lucky. I am blessed. According to the latest numbers, I am one of the around 212,000 confirmed cases in Los Angeles County, but I am not among the around 5,000 deaths, and I had the incredibly good fortune to avoid hospitalization.

I basically lived through a really strange and bad flu. You’ve heard the stories, and mine is actually one of the better ones. Many victims would love to be alive to tell such a relatively benign tale. The depth of their nightmare resonates deeply in me now. This column honors their struggle and commemorates their spirit. May we never forget that behind every coronavirus statistic there is unquantifiable human suffering.

I’m the first person I know who has had the coronavirus. I would occasionally hear acquaintances wonder if it was truly that awful. I can now offer indisputable confirmation. Yes, it really sucks.

My temperature hovered in the upper reaches of 102. It felt like my head was on fire. One night I sweated through five shirts. I shook so much from the chills I thought I chipped a tooth. My chest felt like LeBron James was sitting on it. My fatigue made it feel as if I was dressed in the chains of Jacob Marley’s ghost. I coughed so hard it felt like I broke a rib.

I would fall asleep in a chair and wake up terrified from a hallucinatory dream where I was chased through a playground by old women with giant heads. During phone calls I would get confused and just stop talking. I would begin crying for no reason. I lost my sense of taste, smell, and five pounds in the first four days.

None of this is probably news to anyone who has read about these cases. Everyone knows what happens, even if they never believe it will happen to them.

But still, there are things about this insidious illness that nobody tells you. There are things that surprised me, things that stick with you long after the fever has spiked and the headaches have stopped.

Nobody tells you about the dread. From the moment my doctor phoned me with the test results, to the moment I am writing this column, I have been scared out of my mind.

I know the minuscule overall fatality percentages. I know the overwhelming odds of survival for a 61-year-old male in good health with no preexisting conditions. It doesn’t matter. Once you realize you have a virus that could kill you and there’s nothing anybody can do about it, you live in constant fear.

A couple of weeks ago, I didn’t follow my instincts. I briefly let my guard down. The coronavirus came out swinging.

With every trickle of sweat off your forehead, you worry. With every deep cough, you wonder. You check your temperature 53 times every day, and every single time that thermometer is in your mouth, you close your eyes and pray. You stick your finger in the pulse oximeter every hour, and beg for the number to rise.

Then there are the late nights, when your quarantine feels most acute — when you are the most alone. You start coughing into a wet pillow and you can’t stop and your breath becomes ragged and your bed is soaking and you wonder, is now the time? Do you try to drive yourself to the hospital? Do you call an ambulance? Are you just being a baby? You can’t call any friends or family for help because they can’t be exposed. You can’t call your doctor because he’s already told you there’s nothing he can do. You don’t know what to do, so you simmer alone in the darkness doing nothing, paralyzed by fear and chasing your breath and praying that 102.1 does not become 103.1.

The other emotion nobody tells you about is the anger. You followed all the rules, you wore countless masks, you never strayed far from home, you spent four months battling this thing, and still it hits you with a sucker punch.

In my social circles, I was considered among the least likely person to contract the disease because, basically, I abandoned the circles. For four months I avoided all crowded driveway happy hours and cul-de-sac cocktail parties. I didn’t set foot inside my church even during the brief time it was open. I didn’t set foot inside a grocery store as my youngest daughter Mary Clare, who was quarantined with me for most of the summer, did all the shopping.
Advertisement

Los Angeles Times Lakers reporter Tania Ganguli gives a look at what life is like inside the NBA bubble at Disney World in Orlando, Fla.

I wore a mask everywhere. I followed all the rules, but a couple of weeks ago I didn’t follow my instincts. I briefly let my guard down. The coronavirus came out swinging.

The weekend before my symptoms appeared, for the first time in four months, I met friends for two dinners at two socially distanced patio tables. Nobody is required to wear masks at the tables, so I removed my mask when I sat, as did my dining partners, and we left them off during the entire time we were at the table.

I didn’t do anything that was prohibited, right? I was just following the rules, right?

My guess is that I caught it there.

I’m angry not at the coronavirus, but at myself, because I should have known it doesn’t fight fair, because I was stupid enough to relax around it for even a second, and now my mistake could fester in my system forever.

Framed against the sports world of which I write, my illness has further convinced me that organized team sports played outside an NBA or NHL-style bubble don’t have a chance this fall.

This is why all of college football should follow the smart Pac-12 and Big Ten conferences and cancel their seasons. This is why the NFL should shut down training camps before they begin practicing in earnest. This is why baseball needs to get into a postseason bubble if it has any chance of crowning a champion.

I’ve written all this before, and so I write it again with feeling. It didn’t take much for COVID-19 to make my unexciting life hell. Imagine the increased risk for someone who actually hits and hugs and huddles and hangs out with other people?

The novel coronavirus is not a statistic. It’s not an agenda. It’s not a debate. COVID-19 is real enough to rise up and beat me senseless. We need to stop giving it license to do the same to others.


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

Socially distant outdoors dining was how he caught it. Oh dear.

Everything I read on NextDoor tells the same tale. It's no big deal ... until you know someone who got really sick, or died. Or you got it yourself and fell significantly ill. Or if you work in a hospital, or ambulance. Then all of the sudden it becomes a thing to take seriously.

I don't know if it's that people lack imagination, or empathy, or basic logic skills, and that's why they can't wrap their heads around this deadly contagion.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 21, 2020 4:20 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/05/covid-19-may-spread-more
-easily-schools-than-thought-report-warns



Covid-19 may spread more easily among children than thought, report warns

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 21, 2020 5:31 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/21/us/sturgis-motorcyle-rally-sd-covid
-nebraska-trnd/index.html


South Dakota Department of Transportation officials tracked more than 462,000 vehicles entering Sturgis during the rally. Though the total was a 7.5% decline from the previous year, it is still one of the largest mass gatherings since the start of the pandemic.

Health experts were concerned that this year's Sturgis motorcycle rally could be a "super spreader" event.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 12:48 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


WOMEN HAVING UNSAFE SEX!

Heard this on the MSM radio. Women admitted that only 6% of them wore a mask during sex in the Covid period.

I looked for the news story, no luck.

All those Power-grabbing Lockdown Libtards need to get their Sex Police to enforce the rules, end this cavalier practice.


Edit: Found the story.
http://news.jambroadcasting.com/2020/08/24/survey-says-88-of-women-fin
d-mask-wearing-men-sexy
/
Quote:

The non-scientific poll of 500 people commissioned by Royal shows that the concept of wearing masks during sex is also picking up: While only six percent of those polled say they’ve actually done it, 25% say they’re “open to the idea.”

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 2:16 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


So I've been trying (still) to understand the #newcases and #newdeaths curves, especially the fact that in many places the #newdeaths tends to skyrocket up, then down, whether the nation, state or province chooses lockdown, masking, testing/contact tracing, all of the above. voluntary/structural social distancing, or nothing.

There have been a lot of theories floated, including the idea that there is some sort of pre-existing immunity that allows the "herd immunity" rate to be effective somewhere in to 20% realm v the previously-estimated 80-85% realm. Judging by the curves in the various nations, I've come to the conclusion that this all seems to be the effect of differential exposure. For some strange reason, in many nations, the elderly in care homes were exposed first, which led to tragically high death rates.

As the virus moved out into the general population, the average patient age dropped considerably, as did the death rate.

I look at California and Sweden as "bellweather" examples. Sweden's experience follows my model.

California, which jumped on the lockdown/masking bandwagon early (especially Los Angeles) shows a much lower initial death rate, but now that the virus is moving into formerly spared populations the per capita death rate is also rising.

In addition, the USA is definitely experiencing a "second wave" as the virus sweeps into previously uninfected areas, not just in #newcases but also #positivityrates and #newdeaths.

States that experienced a large early surge in deaths (NY, CT, NH, etc) aren't seeing a "second wave" of deaths, states that were formerly unaffected (Fl, AZ, NV, TX, ID, SC, etc) are seeing their surge now. CA has done an admirable job of flattening the curve... but it hasn't been able to eradicate the virus, just slow it down.

SOME states (MS, GA, LA) are showing a distinct double hump in #newdeaths. They rose, went to near-zero, but are now higher than ever. I have pointed to these states more than once ... what are they doing differently than everybody else?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 3:54 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Good luck eradicating the virus.

Be sure to tell the Flu People how you did it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 4:12 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.



I think the San Quentin data eliminates the 'low percent herd immunity' theory. (This will eventually segue into infection and death rates ... see below.)

I spent quite a bit of time looking at data from the US and around the globe, seeking a cap on either 'per capita infections' rates or 'per capita deaths' rates, and didn't find any, to test out the theory.

San Quentin is an excellent study in what happens if everyone is exposed ... everyone gets it.


With that in mind, what I saw in the various states and countries was the stochastic result of which sub-population had the initial exposure. So, for example, Washington State and Sweden resemble each other in that the initial exposed population was long-term-care residents, with the attendant high mortality rate ... but neither resembles California where spread has been pretty diffuse (multiple pathways through various sub-populations) but stubborn, and none of those 3 resemble NYC where spread was diffuse but explosive. Looking around the globe at Brazil for example, spread was rampant in cities, while the hinterlands were spared early, but not eventually. Looking at New Mexico, spread was high among the Navajo multi-generational households first where it got randomly introduced first, before it tapered off (due to the Navajo taking matters into their own hands to stop the spread), then rose in the general population.

IMO rises and falls in infection rates, and death rates, says more - to me - about the randomness of where the virus gets introduced first, and the patterns of connectivity between that sub-population and the rest of the surrounding sub-populations, than anything else.

And while the spread of the virus to more protected sub-populations may be slowed, it won't ultimately be stopped ... at least not until we reach a herd immunity of ~80%, either through infection or vaccination.

BTW that goes for viral spread through schools, too. Because: the current background thinking is that the virus spreads mainly though super-spreader events; and whether they explicitly mention it or not, the puzzle on school-age children is specifically whether or not they create or sustain a super-spreader event. But in my thinking it doesn't mater. Whether the spread is fast as in a super-spreader event, or slow, what the San Quentin data shows is that ultimately 80% look to be susceptible.

And fwiw I predict that the same factors that make children excellent vectors for flu transmission in fall will make them excellent vectors for SARS-CoV-2 spread as well. Expect a rise as new transmission pathways expose previously isolated sub-populations in fall ... if schools reopen.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 4:15 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


We're all going to get it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 4:20 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


You live in a very, very small JACKAREN exclusive world.

80% could, eventually, over time get the SARS-CoV-2 infection ... unless ... we get a vaccine which can spare large percentages in the near term, and get effective treatments which can rescue the sick; and ultimately we can then stamp it off the face of the earth, the way we did with smallpox.

... But of course, if you advocate doing nothing - as you do - then we'll have maximum infections and maximum deaths, and will never get rid of it.

I apologize to everyone for starting a thread to keep up with facts about SARS-COV-2, and driving JACKAREN over the edge with too much reality.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 4:24 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/88222

Safer Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA Vax Candidate Moves Forward

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 4:30 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
You live in a very, very small JACKAREN exclusive world.

80% could, eventually, over time ... unless ... we get a vaccine which can spare large percentages in the near term and effective treatments which can rescue the sick; and ultimately we can can stamp it off the face of the earth, the way we did with smallpox.

... But of course, if you advocate doing nothing - as you do - then we'll have maximum infections and maximum deaths, and will never get rid of it.

I apologize to everyone for starting a thread to keep up with facts about SARS-COV-2, and driving JACKAREN over the edge with too much reality.

Please don't feed the troll. If you're going to put SIX on ignore, IGNORE him. Stop responding to his trolling.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 4:34 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


My bad. I keep thinking reality matters.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 8:27 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
You live in a very, very small JACKAREN exclusive world.

80% could, eventually, over time get the SARS-CoV-2 infection ... unless ... we get a vaccine which can spare large percentages in the near term, and get effective treatments which can rescue the sick; and ultimately we can then stamp it off the face of the earth, the way we did with smallpox.

... But of course, if you advocate doing nothing - as you do - then we'll have maximum infections and maximum deaths, and will never get rid of it.

I apologize to everyone for starting a thread to keep up with facts about SARS-COV-2, and driving JACKAREN over the edge with too much reality.




Just like we got rid of the flu. Right?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 22, 2020 8:54 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
My bad. I keep thinking reality matters.

It' not just reality that's gone out the window, it's logic.

The problem is, SIX hates ... absolutely hates ... "boomers" and he wants to see them all die off, very quickly. On top of that, he seems to be in denial about viruses.

So he winds up contradicting himself, hoping (on the one hand) that the virus kills a lot of boomers and saying (on the other hand) that it's no worse than "a cold". But what I think is really driving this is that he just hates boomers, and will say anything to promote boomers dying off faster.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, April 19, 2024 12:35 - 3531 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Fri, April 19, 2024 12:11 - 6267 posts
Elections; 2024
Fri, April 19, 2024 10:01 - 2274 posts
BREAKING NEWS: Taylor Swift has a lot of ex-boyfriends
Fri, April 19, 2024 09:18 - 1 posts
This is what baseball bats are for, not to mention you're the one in a car...
Thu, April 18, 2024 23:38 - 1 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Thu, April 18, 2024 23:20 - 742 posts
FACTS
Thu, April 18, 2024 19:48 - 548 posts
Biden's a winner, Trumps a loser. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Thu, April 18, 2024 18:38 - 148 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Thu, April 18, 2024 17:58 - 777 posts
Why does THUGR shit up the board by bumping his pointless threads?
Thu, April 18, 2024 12:38 - 9 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Thu, April 18, 2024 10:21 - 834 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, April 17, 2024 23:58 - 1005 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL