REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

'Kyle did nothing wrong'? or the crimes of the Kenosha Shooter

POSTED BY: JAYNEZTOWN
UPDATED: Friday, March 15, 2024 13:58
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 7998
PAGE 2 of 6

Thursday, November 11, 2021 1:31 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
SECOND: You are implying that ANYONE who sings "God Bless America" is a "Trumptard".

The prosecutors should question the Judge, under oath, if he is a Trumptard. I'm certain the judge would refuse to answer that question or any others about why his phone plays the exact version of a song that Trump uses at his rallies - Trump's theme song. There would be zero reason not to answer, other than the judge doesn't want to go to the place where he is questioned about prejudging the case and siding with little baby Kyle, who cries on the witness stand about how wrong it is punish him for murdering two people because he is a Trumptard. Watch the judge actually give Kyle a bottle to calm the weeping baby.

The judge should not have the stopped the trial for ten minutes. The jury needs to see precisely how long it takes for Kyle to get control of his emotions. They need to judge this baby, not comfort him, since he murdered two victims. The Judge won't allow calling them victims because that prejudices the jury against Kyle. There are no victims, none, in this case, other than Kyle, according to the Judge.



The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 11, 2021 1:47 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


So now you want political tests for judges, bc if they don't have the "correct" politics they can't sit on cases?

Has this judge ever given ANY indication that his rulings have been biased, and not based in law???

Has he ever overstepped his bounds as egregiously as the prosecutor did in the Rittenhouse case?

*****

Prosecutors should question Comey, Strzok, Brennan, Haspell, Lisa Page, McCabe, Steele, Sondland, Fiona Hill, Sussman (Perkins Coie lawyer), Clinesmith (FBI lawyer), Hillary Clinton, and a host of others, under oath, as to whether they engaged in a five-year campaign to bring false charges against Donald Trump.

Now THAT is an investigationn worth pursuing.
Not your gnat-catching "wrong song" peccadillo.

But, we know it will never happen because those high up in power control the process.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 11, 2021 1:52 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


But, what the hell, SECOND!
You hate the Constitution!
You hate the Framers!
You hate America!
You hate Americans!
You have said so, over and over!

And you hate equal justice!
You're nuttier than a fruitcake.


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 11, 2021 1:54 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So now you want political tests for judges, bc if they don't have the "correct" politics they can't sit on cases?

Has this judge ever given ANY indication that his rulings have been biased, and not based in law???

Has he ever overstepped his bounds as egregiously as the prosecutor did in the Rittenhouse case?

*****

Prosecutors should question Comey, Strzok, Brennan, Haspell, Lisa Page, McCabe, Steele, Sondland, Fiona Hill, Sussman (Perkins Coie lawyer), Clinesmith (FBI lawyer), Hillary Clinton, and a host of others, under oath, as to whether they engaged in a five-year campaign to bring false charges against Donald Trump.

Now THAT is an investigationn worth pursuing.
Not your gnat-catching "wrong song" peccadillo.

But, we know it will never happen because those high up in power control the process.

Signym, I never believed you about being a registered Democrat in California. But now I know you are a full of bullshit Trumptard and a Russian troll.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 11, 2021 2:14 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


And the best you an come up with is more lies (libel).

Yanno, I understand Rittenhouse falling apart on the stand. He's a young man describing a fraught experience under charged circumstances. He's all keyed up. I can even understand it being staged (altho it's hard to see how someone can make their face go red, on cue.)

But you're an older man who's seen a lot. What's YOUR excuse for being a duplicitious, twisted fuck who hates everyone and who lies at the first opportunity?

You can hardly hate Rittenhouse for "lying" (as you see it) when you do the very same yourself. You're even less virtuous than he is.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 11, 2021 2:35 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
And the best you an come up with is more lies (libel).

Yanno, I understand Rittenhouse falling apart on the stand. He's a young man describing a fraught experience under charged circumstances. He's all keyed up. I can even understand it being staged (altho it's hard to see how someone can make their face go red, on cue.)

But you're an older man who's seen a lot. What's YOUR excuse for being a duplicitious, twisted fuck who hates everyone and who lies at the first opportunity?

You can hardly hate Rittenhouse for "lying" (as you see it) when you do the very same yourself. You're even less virtuous than he is.

You are getting completely speculative about me, my dear Russian troll, but I am not speculating about you. You have posted a thousand times that Russia didn't interfere in the 2016 election and Trump didn't obstruct the investigation. Being wrong a thousand times does not make you right, Signym.

Justice Dept. Never Fully Examined Trump’s Ties to Russia, Ex-Officials Say

The former deputy attorney general maneuvered to keep investigators from completing an inquiry into whether the president’s personal and financial links to Russia posed a national security threat.

The Justice Department secretly took steps in 2017 to narrow the investigation into Russian election interference and any links to the Trump campaign, according to former law enforcement officials, keeping investigators from completing an examination of President Trump’s decades-long personal and business ties to Russia.

The special counsel who finished the investigation, Robert S. Mueller III, secured three dozen indictments and convictions of some top Trump advisers, and he produced a report that outlined Russia’s wide-ranging operations to help get Mr. Trump elected and the president’s efforts to impede the inquiry.

But law enforcement officials never fully investigated Mr. Trump’s own relationship with Russia, even though some career F.B.I. counterintelligence investigators thought his ties posed such a national security threat that they took the extraordinary step of opening an inquiry into them. Within days, the former deputy attorney general Rod J. Rosenstein curtailed the investigation without telling the bureau, all but ensuring it would go nowhere.

A bipartisan report by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee released this month came the closest to an examination of the president’s links to Russia. Senators depicted extensive ties between Trump associates and Russia, identified a close associate of a former Trump campaign chairman as a Russian intelligence officer and outlined how allegations about Mr. Trump’s encounters with women during trips to Moscow could be used to compromise him. But the senators acknowledged they lacked access to the full picture, particularly any insight into Mr. Trump’s finances.

Now, as Mr. Trump seeks re-election, major questions about his approach to Russia remain unanswered. He has repeatedly shown an openness to Russia, an adversary that attacked American democracy in 2016, and he has refused to criticize or challenge the Kremlin’s increasing aggressions toward the West. The president has also rejected the intelligence community’s finding that Russia interfered in 2016 to bolster his candidacy and the spy agencies’ assessment that Russia is trying to sabotage this year’s election again on his behalf.

More at https://web.archive.org/web/20211022115818/https://www.nytimes.com/202
0/08/30/us/politics/trump-russia-justice-department.html


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 11, 2021 3:03 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


You know who I am IRL.

I never said Russian didn't intefere in the election. They posted some posts and Tweeted some tweets. In the torrent of M$M, FB posts and Twitter tweets, they were nearly invisible.

What the Trump campaign did NOT do is "collude" with Russia, which is what occupied the media... AND YOUR POSTS ... 24/7/365 for years. What there is no evidence for is that the Russians "exfiltrated" the DNC emails.

As usual. when caught in a lie you move the goalposts.

We all know what you are, SECOND.
You're a hater.
You're a killer.
You're a leech on the American people.

You hate the Constitution.
You hate the Framers.
You hate America.
You hate Americans.
You even hate "God Bless America".
You've posted it often enough!

And you will lie compulsively and obsessively in service to your hate, and virtue-signal endlessly to cover your sins.

And since you're less of a person than Rittenhouse, I'm putting you on "ignore", again. So I will spend the next few months doing what I've done the past few months: Ignoring you.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 11, 2021 5:09 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.



And yet he claims to be a utilitarian despite posting the same things over and over that are proven frauds, and therefore doomed to failure from the start.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 11, 2021 7:33 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Utilitarian?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 11, 2021 9:35 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.



The greatest good for the greatest number.

Of course that begs the questions 'what is good' and 'when do you measure it'?

If having an abundant good life is 'good', but the population eventually kills the planet with its abundant life - was an abundant life for so many a good thing? And so on.

It's a philosophy made for people who have delusions of omniscience.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 11, 2021 11:08 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Since when did SECOND ever claim he was for greatest good/greatest number?

Far as I can tell he's only for his own good.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 12:20 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
You should listen to this, especially the exerpts from a trial The judge (A Dem-appointed one BTW) was so pissed off at the prosecution he was spluttering.



The only thing I can think of is that the prosecution, knowing that their case has fallen apart under the weight of video evidence, is aiming at another bite of the apple by having a mistrial declared because of prosecutorial misconduct.

Excellent video.
Is that how Tucker is all the time?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 11:56 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Since when did SECOND ever claim he was for greatest good/greatest number?

Far as I can tell he's only for his own good.

Gaige Grosskreutz, the only survivor of three people Rittenhouse shot Aug. 25, 2020, in Kenosha, Wisconsin, watched Rittenhouse, 18, testify in his defense Wednesday and said it was an emotional experience.

Grosskreutz, a paramedic from suburban Milwaukee, was in Kenosha on Aug. 25 last year offering medical services.

Grosskreutz had a gun in hand when he approached Rittenhouse but said he wasn't threatening Rittenhouse when he was shot.

"I think the most important thing to remember is that Kyle Rittenhouse was an active shooter. He murdered two men, and he attempted to murder me," Grosskreutz said.

Rittenhouse's defense, which is claiming self-defense, rested late Thursday afternoon.

"Well, I think any time you see your would-be murderer on the stand, it’s emotional," Grosskreutz said on ABC's "Good Morning America."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/kyle-rittenhouse-was-an-active-sh
ooter-according-to-wounded-paramedic/ar-AAQAFBC


Take note that every Trumptard at fireflyfans.net has taken the murderer's side, as has every Trumptard I know in Texas, as has Trump. There is a pattern here, maybe even a philosophy if you want to get abstract about Trumptards' everyday beastliness :
"Trump Defends Kenosha Shooting Suspect"
https://www.npr.org/sections/live-updates-protests-for-racial-justice/
2020/08/31/908137377/trump-defends-kenosha-shooting-suspect


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 2:01 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


My big old bag of Fuck You, I Told You So's is on standby for the verdict on this case.

Won't be long now.



--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 2:22 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
My big old bag of Fuck You, I Told You So's is on standby for the verdict on this case.

Won't be long now.

As we know from O.J. Simpson's murder trial, $millions buys a not guilty verdict. Grosskreutz, a paramedic who was shot but not killed by Kyle Rittenhouse, testified he was not attacking Rittenhouse. It won't be unexpected if Rittenhouse gets declared innocent of shooting Grosskreutz, once again, because money can buy a not guilty verdict.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 2:56 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Shut up dude.

Why don't you tell everybody again how the half Latino kid who shot three white degenerate morons is a white supremacist.

Idiot. You and your treasonous Legacy Media are a bunch of idiots.



--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 3:58 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Shut up dude.

Why don't you tell everybody again how the half Latino kid who shot three white degenerate morons is a white supremacist.

Idiot. You and your treasonous Legacy Media are a bunch of idiots.

Kyle Rittenhouse avoided the police, got in his car, and went home after killing two people. An innocent person goes to the police and talks to them about it without a lawyer. Days later, the police arrested Kyle Rittenhouse, who was in hiding, then had to fight in court for months to extradite him, because he refused to go, same as he avoided the police after he killed two people.

Illinois authorities extradite Kyle Rittenhouse to Wisconsin
https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-extradition-kenosha-4a2be2
814fe56d961a22b76943a24426


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 4:12 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Shut up dude.

Why don't you tell everybody again how the half Latino kid who shot three white degenerate morons is a white supremacist.

Idiot. You and your treasonous Legacy Media are a bunch of idiots.

Kyle Rittenhouse avoided the police, got in his car, and went home after killing two people. An innocent person goes to the police and talks to them about it without a lawyer. Days later, the police arrested Kyle Rittenhouse, who was in hiding, then had to fight in court for months to extradite him, because he refused to go, same as he avoided the police after he killed two people.

Illinois authorities extradite Kyle Rittenhouse to Wisconsin
https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-extradition-kenosha-4a2be2
814fe56d961a22b76943a24426


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two



He didn't avoid the police. There is video and photographs of him walking right along side of them.

Just like there is video of him (a half-Latino minor) shooting white degenerate adults in self-defense, the surviving one of them admitting on the stand that he was shot in self-defense. That wasn't some bombshell revelation. That was a one-armed idiot finally fessing up and telling the truth so he doesn't loose his freedom for perjuring himself on top of his arm.


You're a fucking idiot, and so is everyone in your cult. YOU got those men killed. You and your lying, race-baiting media who emboldened their criminal behavior for a whole year leading up to it.

If the Democrats don't purge your kind out of their party, Democrats are toast.

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 4:21 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

If the Democrats don't purge your kind out of their party, Democrats are toast.

Kyle Rittenhouse executed two people on the street. If he gets away with that, Trumptards will be executing people, too, the next time they don't win an election. That is the reason Trumptards have contributed money to Rittenhouse's defense and have such strong opinions that he is "innocent".

Trumptards dream of killing:
Gun sales in the United States rose 40% last year to 39,695,315.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2021/02/10/this-is-how-many-guns-
were-sold-in-all-50-states/43371461
/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 6:15 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.



Why are you 2 arguing with partial truths ... and partial lies?

Anyway, there was also video BEFORE the shooting started.

Quote:

https://www.aol.com/news/judge-rittenhouse-trial-not-allow-164122124-2
13334189.html

KENOSHA, Wis. (Reuters) - The judge in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse said on Friday he would instruct the jury they can consider the prosecution's argument that the teenager provoked an encounter with one of two men he fatally shot during protests in Wisconsin last year.
Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney James Kraus showed grainy drone video of the Rosenbaum shooting as he argued that Rittenhouse raised his AR-15-style rifle shortly before the encounter and pointed it at some people, including another man, Joshua Ziminski, who fired a gunshot in the air.
"The simple argument is there's plenty of evidence that the state has brought in that he raised his gun," Kraus said. "We have evidence of provocation."



There was also video of Rittenhouse actively chasing somebody down before the shooting took place. Who, it isn't clear. But he was an armed aggressor, not defensive.



Let it all come out ... and then let the jury decide.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 7:36 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
If he gets away with that, Trumptards will be executing people



You mean how Leftists get away with it all the time?

Oh woe is you.

lol

You're a fuckin' riot.

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 12, 2021 9:25 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Like I said, it was a melee, with guns.

People were chasing Rittenhouse because they thought he was an "active shooter", but Rittenhouse didn't actually shoot until AFTER he was being chased. It was somebody else, who fired into the air, that seemed to set off the chase.

There is a lot of video evidence, very little of which has been made public and timelined.

Is it murder to chase someone while holding a gun? Is it murder to raise your gun in someone's direction? (Once upon a time we were mocycling off-road and came across a group of plinkers, and when I looked back I saw someone sighting their gun on us. It made me so mad I wanted to beat the crap outta that a-hole, just bc of his sheer stupidity. But of course, I couldn't bc ... they had guns. And they were probably drunk.)

That would be - I dunno - assault, maybe. Whatever charge you can bring against someone for threatening with a gun.

But then, what idiot tries to grab a gun from who you think is an active shooter? A would-be hero?

It's all a clusterfuck. I would love to see the evidence for myself.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 1:47 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Closing arguments are scheduled for Monday.

100s of extra Law Enforcement Officers are scheduled. Libtard Gov Skeletor Evers has authorized 500 WI Army National Guard to be deployed.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 7:40 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Like I said, it was a melee, with guns.

It's all a clusterfuck. I would love to see the evidence for myself.

This case is easy to understand, unless you don't want to understand that guns are NOT for protection, but for killing. An AR-15 is NOT a Star Wars lightsaber, which can deflect bullets. The AR-15 is only for killing people, except some people who are incompetent it is only for making noises. How many people were shot? 3. How many shooters? 1. Is the jury going to hold the shooter responsible? Is the jury going to believe that Rittenhouse was there to protect himself? Or was he there to kill Libtards? Rittenhouse became the darling of people who want to kill Libtards, but the jury wasn't shown that evidence about why Rittenhouse left his house and went to confront Libtards with an AR-15.

Smith & Wesson M&P 15 https://www.smith-wesson.com/product/mp-15-sport-ii

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 9:49 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Delusional.

The only one here always talking about killing people is you.

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 10:12 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Delusional.

The only one here always talking about killing people is you.

I understand completely why four guys kicked the shit of you, then stabbed you, putting you in the hospital. You ran your fucking mouth and than they kicked you. Kyle Rittenhouse was pointing a rifle at people, then he and his highly paid defense team blame the people Rittenhouse shot for what happened next. Rittenhouse had no business being there, he was too young to own a gun, and he is too mentally unstable to control himself and not kill people and the people who are siding with Rittenhouse are just as mentally unstable as he is about the feeling they are threatened by Libtards and killing Libtards. If Rittenhouse is declared not guilty, it is open season on Libtards because the Trumptards in America have bought 50,000,000 guns this year and 40,000,000 last year, not for protection, but for killing Libtards.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 10:21 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Delusional.

The only one here always talking about killing people is you.

I understand completely why four guys kicked the shit of you, than stabbed you, putting you in the hospital. You ran your fucking mouth and than they kicked you. Kyle Rittenhouse was pointing a rifle at people, then he and his highly paid defense team blame the people Rittenhouse shot for what happened next. Rittenhouse had no business being there, he was too young to own a gun, and he is too mentally unstable to control himself and not kill people and the people who are siding with Rittenhouse are just as mentally unstable as he is about the feeling they are threatened by Libtards and killing Libtards. If Rittenhouse is declared not guilty, it is open season on Libtards because the Trumptards in America have bought 50,000,000 guns this year and 40,000,000 last year, not for protection, but for killing Libtards.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two



Yup. Four gangbanging drug dealers are the good guys.

One of them is still where they all belong. I assume the other three either found they way back where they belong or are dead now.


You're a fucking idiot and you're the only one on this forum always talking about who you would kill and why.


Don't worry dude. I don't believe in pre-crime. I'm not going to anybody with the bullshit you've posted here. But you've left an awful long paper trail of horrible shit that you're going to have regretted posting if you ever become a person of interest and anybody starts asking for the archive.

Especially when they've got the tools to add all of Reaverfan's posts to your own when they easily confirm that he was your alias.



--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 10:25 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


P.S. The biggest killer of "Libtards" is "Libtards".

They are the vast majority and almost complete makeup of criminal possession of firearms and those who regularly use illegally purchased and owned firearms on each other.

More people died in Chicago yesterday than Kyle killed in self-defense over a year ago.

Which one are you still talking about?

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 10:32 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
P.S. The biggest killer of "Libtards" is "Libtards".

They are the vast majority and almost complete makeup of criminal possession of firearms and those who regularly use illegally purchased and owned firearms on each other.

More people died in Chicago yesterday than Kyle killed in self-defense over a year ago.

Which one are you still talking about?

Libtards are not sending money to Chicago to defend drive-by shooters who kill people, but Trumptards are sending money to defend Rittenhouse because the Trumptards approve of Rittenhouse killing people that Trumptards hate.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 10:45 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


I've got people I've got to help out today. No more time to waste on scum like you, shitbag.

Enjoy your weekend full of doing nothing for anybody but yourself.



--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 10:58 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I've got people I've got to help out today. No more time to waste on scum like you, shitbag.

Enjoy your weekend full of doing nothing for anybody but yourself.

I expected you to withdraw from your endorsement of Rittenhouse killing people you hate, but you disappointed me by, instead, withdrawing into a pose of moral superiority looking down on "scum"/"shitbag". You lost your case even if Rittenhouse is declared Not Guilty on all charges by the jury.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 12:42 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

SIGNYM:
Like I said, it was a melee, with guns.

It's all a clusterfuck. I would love to see the evidence for myself.

SECONDRATE: This case is easy to understand, unless you don't want to understand that guns are NOT for protection, but for killing. An AR-15 is NOT a Star Wars lightsaber, which can deflect bullets. The AR-15 is only for killing people, except some people who are incompetent it is only for making noises. How many people were shot? 3. How many shooters? 1. Is the jury going to hold the shooter responsible? Is the jury going to believe that Rittenhouse was there to protect himself?



It doesn't matterwhat he was there "for". What matters, at least as far as I understand, are the circumstances immediately before Rittenhouse fired his weapon.

It's one thing to shoot gooks running away from a helicopter ... you can take time to pick your targets and aim.

It's another to shoot when a mob is chasing you and one is pointing a weapon at you.

I know there are various legal limits on self defense in various states. Not sure of the applicable law in this state, but IMHO some of the limits that I've seen require far more cool-headedness than I would expect of the average civilian.

When faced with - literally- an enraged mob (a mob which, apparently, mistakenly believes that you just shot somebody) there is no hope of self defense unless you have a gun.

If Rittenhouse REALLY wanted to kill libtards, he would have positioned himself on a tall building, and started picking people off, like any sensible mass shooter. Yanno, like you shooting from a helicopter.

So instead of grinding on and on with your obsession about Rittenhouse's supposed motives ... and you have a consistent history of being wrong with your "mind reading" ... you should look at his actions.

The evidence. There's a lot of it. What does it say?


I don't know. I've only seen bits and pieces. You've prolly seen even less than I have.


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 1:54 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

It doesn't matter what he was there "for". What matters, at least as far as I understand, are the circumstances immediately before Rittenhouse fired his weapon.

Signym, it would be so much clearer why Rittenhouse was there if only Rittenhouse had 30 hand grenades rather than a magazine that holds 30 rounds. His defense lawyers would claim that the 30 grenades were not for killing but for "protection" by throwing a few grenades and letting the noise scare off any Libtards who have gotten too close that their nearness menaces poor little Kyle Rittenhouse. Too bad that hand grenades aren't covered by Supreme Court decisions: https://www.google.com/search?q=decision+legalizing+handguns

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 2:19 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


As usual, you avoid reality, SECOND.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 2:21 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
You should listen to this, especially the exerpts from a trial The judge (A Dem-appointed one BTW) was so pissed off at the prosecution he was spluttering.



The only thing I can think of is that the prosecution, knowing that their case has fallen apart under the weight of video evidence, is aiming at another bite of the apple by having a mistrial declared because of prosecutorial misconduct.

Excellent video.
Is that how Tucker is all the time?

I don't know. Is he on every day? I only listen occasionally. This was pointed ou to me.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 2:25 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
As usual, you avoid reality, SECOND.

It is you avoiding reality, Signym:

Wisconsin state law clearly states that lawful gun owners can “generally open carry without a permit” as long as the person wielding the “dangerous weapon” is 18 or older. However, Rittenhouse’s defense attorney is arguing that his client was protected under a different “vague state law” that allows younger children to carry rifles for hunting.

Criminal defense attorneys who specialize in Wisconsin firearm law say it will be hard for the defense to get their perspective accepted.

“There are a variety of defenses to this charge; none of them are great or even rise to the level of good,” said Tom Grieve, a Milwaukee-based criminal defense attorney, who spoke to the Washington Post about the hunting law defense.

Legal Claim to Self Defense?

Some advocates have argued that Rittenhouse relinquished his right to self-defense by committing the crime of having carried a firearm while being under the age of 18.

But Racine-based attorney Patrick Cafferty who previously defended Jacob Blake in criminal court said that the legal basis for a self-defense argument “is sort of a moving target. It’s very fact-specific in each case.”

If somebody commits misdemeanor disorderly conduct by yelling at someone on the street, but then the person being yelled at retaliates by trying to stab the person yelling, the right to self-defense would be retained by the original aggressor who now is trying to avoid being stabbed, Cafferty told the Journal Times.

“It gets more complicated in the case of Rittenhouse,” Cafferty said.

He detailed that if Rittenhouse and his team can prove that he acted in self-defense in the killing of Rosenbaum, then the argument that he was defending himself from the other “mob” that was chasing him would have legs. However, if Rittenhouse is deemed to be the “aggressor in the situation” then he would not have the right to use deadly force.

“People have lost the right to defend themselves if they have provoked aggression against themselves,” Cafferty said.

In the shooting of Rosenbaum, “Rittenhouse is claiming ‘I didn’t commit a crime … Therefore (Rittenhouse argues) no one else had the right to disarm me,’” Cafferty said.

“That’s what this case comes down to.”

https://thecrimereport.org/2021/11/11/rittenhouse-trial-why-was-a-17-y
ear-old-carrying-a-firearm-in-public
/

Signym, it is a crime to cross into another state, parade down the street with your illegal weapon in order to intimidate your political enemies, then kill two of them. I forget the third person, only losing his arm, also one of Rittenhouse's political enemies, contradicts Rittenhouse's story.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 2:44 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


I see that the Trumptards are harassing the only survivor of Rittenhouse's murder spree because the survivor is their political enemy:

The shooting and its aftermath have changed Grosskreutz's life. The injury to his arm has left him unable to serve as a medic. He doesn't have the upper body strength for much of the outdoor recreation he loves. He's been threatened online, which is why he's reluctant to reveal some details about his family and where he went to school.

Others online have tried to smear his character by claiming he's a felon who wasn't legally allowed to possess the handgun he carried the night of the protest.

After three surgeries and a week in the hospital, Grosskreutz is home. He's in constant pain, but he won't take opiates; he's wary of them, and he's seen the damage they can do. It's not clear how much function he'll regain in his arm. He is grateful doctors left him with the option of amputating later, if it comes to that.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/09/11/medic-recalls-be
ing-shot-arm-kyle-rittenhouse-kenosha-protest/3466920001
/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 4:53 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Rittenhouse is charged with a number of crimes.

Some laws he clearly violated. Others aren't so clear. But being guilty of one crime doesn't mean you're guilty of all of them. Jury could find guilty of some and not guilty of others.

As you posted, it is FACT SPECIFIC in each case. Do you have ALL of the relevant facts?

I doubt it. I know I don't. Therefore I can't reach a decision. I don't know "what started it all". I don't know all of the preceding events.

However, who was running away?
Rittenhouse.
Who was pursuing?
Not Rittenhouse.
That weighs rather heavily to me.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 4:55 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
P.S. The biggest killer of "Libtards" is "Libtards".

They are the vast majority and almost complete makeup of criminal possession of firearms and those who regularly use illegally purchased and owned firearms on each other.

More people died in Chicago yesterday than Kyle killed in self-defense over a year ago.

Which one are you still talking about?

Libtards are not sending money to Chicago to defend drive-by shooters who kill people, but Trumptards are sending money to defend Rittenhouse because the Trumptards approve of Rittenhouse killing people that Trumptards hate.



Leftists don't need to send any money to Chicago. Kim Foxx lets all of them go even when they murder each other in the streets in daylight with dozens of witnesses everywhere.'

Everyone involved in BLM and Antifa riots, looting and arson need to GTFO the country.

They don't need to die. They just need to find a country that will tolerate them. Because we're done with them.


Empty out the prisons of all non-violent drug offenders and put everyone from BLM and Antifa in there.

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 4:57 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
I see that the Trumptards are harassing the only survivor of Rittenhouse's murder spree because the survivor is their political enemy:



Nobody is crying for that fucking retard.

He'll be fine. You only need one hand to flip burgers.


If you follow the prosecution’s case against Kyle Rittenhouse, the only logical end is the assertion that self-defense is almost never an option and visiting the scene of a riot is only okay if you are there to burn property.
--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 13, 2021 8:19 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


The Young Turks comes out and issues a correction after one and a half years of falsely slamming Kyle with lies.

The "journalists" there with their journalist degrees couldn't be bothered to watch any of the videos of the incident until it went to trial. Either that, or they fucking lied about everything knowing full well they were lying up until they couldn't lie about it anymore.

Even TYT disagrees with you now, Second. You racist little bitch.






Ana Kasparian and Fat Fuck are too stupid to have jobs.



--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 14, 2021 12:09 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

SIGNYM:
Like I said, it was a melee, with guns.

It's all a clusterfuck. I would love to see the evidence for myself.

SECONDRATE: This case is easy to understand, unless you don't want to understand that guns are NOT for protection, but for killing. An AR-15 is NOT a Star Wars lightsaber, which can deflect bullets. The AR-15 is only for killing people, except some people who are incompetent it is only for making noises. How many people were shot? 3. How many shooters? 1. Is the jury going to hold the shooter responsible? Is the jury going to believe that Rittenhouse was there to protect himself?

It doesn't matterwhat he was there "for". What matters, at least as far as I understand, are the circumstances immediately before Rittenhouse fired his weapon.

It's one thing to shoot gooks running away from a helicopter ... you can take time to pick your targets and aim.

It's another to shoot when a mob is chasing you and one is pointing a weapon at you.

I know there are various legal limits on self defense in various states. Not sure of the applicable law in this state, but IMHO some of the limits that I've seen require far more cool-headedness than I would expect of the average civilian.

When faced with - literally- an enraged mob (a mob which, apparently, mistakenly believes that you just shot somebody) there is no hope of self defense unless you have a gun.

If Rittenhouse REALLY wanted to kill libtards, he would have positioned himself on a tall building, and started picking people off, like any sensible mass shooter. Yanno, like you shooting from a helicopter.

So instead of grinding on and on with your obsession about Rittenhouse's supposed motives ... and you have a consistent history of being wrong with your "mind reading" ... you should look at his actions.

The evidence. There's a lot of it. What does it say?


I don't know. I've only seen bits and pieces. You've prolly seen even less than I have.

As always, introduction of facts and truth ruins the Libtard narrative.

Kyle spent that day working as Lifeguard for the City of Kenosha. Saving lives of innocent people really irks Libtards. And I recall Libtards avoided working with us Lifeguards.

Following that, and feeling a part of the Kenosha community, he went to the high school to clean off graffiti vandalism from the out of town invading rioters. Libtards wouldn't get caught dead cleaning up their own work.

Then, still feeling part of the Kenosha community, he responded to the call for help from the Car Dealership Owner to protect his property from out of town invading looters, arsonists and rioters. Libtards hate that he was trying to defeat them, after they bussed in from NY and Portland/Seattle.



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/kyle-rittenhouse-working-life
guard-kenosha-day-shooting-went-clean-vandalism-school-work
/

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 14, 2021 1:32 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I'm not sure if you are serious or not.

Plenty of lies posted elsewhere on this board on this topic.

There are no Assault Weapons in WI, not even the ugly mugs of Libtard women.

Until 2017, people needed to be 12 years old to carry a shotgun or rifle in WI, but then Gov Walker signed the Law eliminating the minimum age requirement. Handguns possession is a bit more murky. Cannon are legal in MI, but I don't think so in WI.

The rifle Kyle had was purchased in WI, owned by a WI resident, never left the State on the day of the attacks upon Kyle, and was never subject to IL Laws.

Many IL residents venture to WI to hunt and partake in celebration of 2nd Amendment Rights (which are much curtailed in IL). There is a popular bumper sticker which says "WISCONSIN: Illinois' Largest State Park"


Also, Trump had to call Gov Skeletor Evers and plead him to call out the National Guard (which Evers controls, as Gov) - because Evers didn't want to restore any civilized environment in WI (rioting in both Kenosha and WI, and this weekend in Green Bay)

Some have posted that Kyle is obviously guilty of some of the 6 charges filed against him.
Which charge(s)?

Libtard out-of-Staters and citislickers have blathered on about the weapons charge, carrying a dangerous weapon while under 18 years of age. They reference State Law which prohibits carrying short barrel shotgun or short barrel rifle.
Kids older than 12 can carry shotguns and rifles, and 13 year olds don't need a hunting license to do so.



Judge Schroeder stated that this law was complicated and he needed to review it.

So what charge did Kyle obviously violate?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 14, 2021 1:52 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
The Young Turks comes out and issues a correction after one and a half years of falsely slamming Kyle with lies.

The "journalists" there with their journalist degrees couldn't be bothered to watch any of the videos of the incident until it went to trial. Either that, or they fucking lied about everything knowing full well they were lying up until they couldn't lie about it anymore.

Even TYT disagrees with you now, Second. You racist little bitch.





Ana Kasparian and Fat Fuck are too stupid to have jobs.



The guy seems completely retarded.
Where is he from? NYC? Turkey?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 15, 2021 11:08 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Judge Drops Rittenhouse Gun Charge, Finds He Legally Carried AR-15 In Kenosha

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/judge-drops-rittenhouse-gun-charge-f
inds-he-legally-carried-ar-15-kenosha


Or, for those who bother to follow the embedded link...



Quote:

Was Rittenhouse’s Possession of the AR-15 Unlawful?
Johnathan Turley

In covering the motions hearing last week in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, I noted a surprising comment from Judge Bruce Schroeder that he had “spent hours” with the Wisconsin gun law and could not state with certainty what it means in this case. The statement could effectively knock out the misdemeanor gun possession count — the one count that could still be in play for the jury after the prosecution’s case on the more serious offense appeared to collapse in court. A close examination of that provision reveals ample reason to question not just its meaning but its application to this case.

The unlawful possession of the gun has been a prominent fact cited not only by the prosecutors but the press.

At trial, however, prosecutor Thomas Binger at points seemed to be learning the governing law from Rittenhouse. For example, he pressed Rittenhouse on why he did not just purchase a handgun rather than an AR-15. Rittenhouse replied he could not possess a hand gun at his age. Binger then asked in apparent disbelief that the law allowed him to have an AR-15 but not a handgun and Rittenhouse said yes. Binger then moved on after seemingly drawing out a point for the defense.

The exchange was all the more baffling because it drew attention to the fact that one of Binger’s alleged “victims” was an adult named Gaige Grosskreutz who also decided to bring a handgun to the protests and pointed his .40 caliber Glock at the head of Rittenhouse when he was shot in the arm.

However, the most damaging moment came outside of the presence of the jury when the judge drilled down on the law. He told the prosecutors “I have been wrestling with this statute with, I’d hate to count the hours I’ve put into it, I’m still trying to figure out what it says, what’s prohibited. I have a legal education.” He added that he failed to understand how an “ordinary citizen” could understand what is illegal.

It is hard to understand how the count could be given to the jury without a clear understanding of what it means. It is also hard to instruct a jury on an ambiguous statute. Criminal laws are supposed to be interpreted narrowly. It is called the “rule of lenity” and has been around in the English system for centuries. For example, in 1547, the court was faced with a law making it a felony to steal “Horses, Geldings or Mares.” Given the use of plural nouns, the court ruled that it did not apply to stealing just one horse.

The problem with the Wisconsin statute is not a problem of pluralization but definition. It is not clear that the statute actually bars possession by Rittenhouse. Indeed, it may come down to the length of Rittenhouse’s weapon and the prosecutors never bothered to measure it and place it into evidence.

In Wisconsin, minors cannot possess short-barreled rifles under Section 941.28. Putting aside the failure to put evidence into the record to claim such a short length, it does not appear to be the case here. Rittenhouse used a Smith & Wesson MP-15 with an advertised barrel length of 16 inches and the overall length is 36.9 inches. That is not a short barrel.

Then there is the rest of the statute and ultimately the word “and.” Under Section 948.60(2)(a) (“Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18”), “[a]ny person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.” That makes Rittenhouse guilty, right?

Well, you then have to look at the subsection (c), which states that “This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593.”

Since there is no evidence that Rittenhouse violated Section 941.28, he presumably must be in violation of both sections 29.304 and 29.593.. The defense conceded Rittenhouse was in violation of Section 29.593, which requires certification for weapons. However, he is not in violation of section 29.304, entitled “Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.” As the title indicates, the section makes it illegal for persons under 16 to use firearms. Rittenhouse was 17 at the time and the prosecution has not challenged that fact.

If Rittenhouse were convicted on that count, it could face a serious challenge on appeal. Indeed, it is curious is why Schroeder would even submit the count to the jury if it is uncontested that Rittenhouse was 17. If that is the correct interpretation of the statute, there would be no way for a jury to reasonably convict Rittenhouse. It is akin to giving the jury a criminal count based on his use of force as a police officer when there is no evidence that he was a police officer.

The defense also offered legislative history to support the narrower interpretation but the prosecution opposed such reliance on material beyond of the language itself. However, that language is difficult to square with the charge and the evidence in this case.

Rittenhouse is obviously facing other counts. However, on that count, the question comes down to the “and.” To paraphrase Johnnie Cochran from the O.J. Simpson trial, if that clause “doesn’t fit, you must acquit.”


https://jonathanturley.org/2021/11/14/was-rittenhouses-possession-of-t
he-ar-15-unlawful
/




-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 15, 2021 11:16 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.



Quote:

Prosecutors crash and burn in Kyle Rittenhouse case, but polarized America doesn't see it
Rittenhouse is not on trial for American society's historical racism, and such history does not change the underlying facts of his case.
Jonathan Turley


The trial of Kyle Rittenhouse increasingly seems like a legal version of the parable of the blind men and the elephant. By only touching discrete parts of the animal, the men describe vastly different animals. In coverage of this trial, one would think that there were parallel trials occurring in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

One consensus however is emerging: Things are not going well for the prosecution.

But the reason for this developing failure depends greatly on what media you are watching other than the trial itself. It is either the product of systemic errors or systemic racism.

Rittenhouse is facing six charges that range from first-degree homicide to a misdemeanor of being a minor in possession of a dangerous weapon. At this stage, the prosecution may celebrate even a misdemeanor conviction.
Prosecution's bumpy start, and finish

The prosecution stumbled out of the gate in the trial. Gaige Grosskreutz was the third person to be shot by Rittenhouse. Grosskreutz admitted under cross-examination that Rittenhouse did not shoot him when he had his hands up after their confrontation. He admitted that it was only after he pointed his handgun at Rittenhouse and moved toward him that Rittenhouse fired.

Likewise, a prosecution witness, Ryan Balch, testified that one of the other people shot, Joseph Rosenbaum, said that he intended to kill Kyle Rittenhouse. Other witnesses described Rosenbaum as "belligerent" or "hyperaggressive."

USA TODAY's Carli Pierson:Kyle Rittenhouse deserves an award for his melodramatic performance on the witness stand.

Later, the prosecution called Richard McGinniss, a journalist with The Daily Caller who was reporting from Kenosha that night. He was near Rittenhouse when Joseph Rosenbaum was shot. The prosecutor told McGinniss, “I mean you have no idea what Mr. Rosenbaum was ever thinking at any point of his life. You have never been inside his head, you never met him before.”

McGinnis said, “I never exchanged words with him, if that’s what your question is.”

The prosecutor then pressed McGinnis on how he had no idea what Rosenbaum was thinking because it “is complete guesswork, isn’t it?”

That is when McGinnis delivered a haymaker, noting, “Well he said (expletive) you, and then he reached for the weapon.”

Opinions in your inbox: Get a digest of our takes on current events every day

The prosecution's own medical expert, Dr. Doug Kelly, appeared to confirm that the forensic evidence of soot injuries on Rosenbaum's hand could be consistent with Rosenbaum trying to grab the barrel of Rittenhouse's rifle when the gun was fired.

It got worse from there, including a glaring constitutional violation by the prosecution when Binger began his cross examination of Rittenhouse by commenting on his decision to remain silent.

The judge correctly tore into the prosecutor. Any first-year law student knows that you cannot comment on the silence of a Mirandized defendant after an arrest under the Fifth Amendment – let alone ignore a court order.
Biased media viewers

Even without the unforced errors by the prosecution, this was always a difficult case. Wisconsin has a strong self-defense standard. After a defendant claims to have acted to repel a threat, the burden is on the prosecution to rebut that claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

Instead, the prosecution prompted its own witnesses to create layers of doubt in the case. In doing so, it seems to have reduced the range of possibilities to somewhere between a hung jury and outright acquittal on the major charges.
Kyle Rittenhouse testifies about fatally shooting two people

The problem is that many people may be unaware that the case is collapsing due to such evidentiary or tactical failures. Any hung jury or acquittal will come as a shock, and the level of outrage is likely to be greater. This case began with violent rioting in Kenosha, and the news coverage is fueling the danger of renewed violence.

It is even worse in that some coverage has dismissed the trial as an exhibition of raw racism. Some have criticized Judge Bruce Schroeder after he enforced long-standing constitutional principles and defended the core constitutional right of the defendant against self-incrimination.

USA TODAY's Suzette Hackney:Kyle Rittenhouse shot his victims, but we can't call them that? What kind of justice system is this?

MSNBC host Tiffany Cross advocated for Schroeder’s removal and called on columnist Elie Mystal to discuss the matter. Mystal, who stated earlier this month that white, non-college-educated voters supported Republicans in the 2021 races in part because they care about "using their guns on Black people and getting away with it," not surprisingly, has written that this trial is a sham.
One man – not society – is on trial

MSNBC’s host Joy Reid also attacked the trial and suggested that Rittenhouse’s emotional breakdown on the stand was fraudulent. Her guest, MSNBC legal analyst and Georgetown law professor Paul Butler, concurred and called it “the greatest performance of (his) life.”

Butler declared Rittenhouse “was well-prepared by his defense attorneys to disrupt his image as a trigger-happy vigilante who went on a shooting rampage at a Black Lives Matter protest.”

Butler, who has written that Black jurors should use “jury nullification” to refuse to convict Black defendants in drug cases, insisted in a previous appearance that an acquittal would fuelfuture violence by white people.

Reid added Wednesday, “If you want to know why critical race theory exists, the actual law school theory that emphasizes that supposedly colorblind laws in America often still have racially discriminatory outcomes, then look no further than the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse.”

However, Rittenhouse is not to be judged for society’s historical racism, and such history does not change the underlying facts.

Either Grosskreutz (who is white) was pointing the gun at Rittenhouse’s head or he was not. Either Rosenbaum (who was white) was grabbing the barrel of Rittenhouse’s gun or he was not. Such facts do not change through CRT translations.

Many in the media rightly criticized those who encouraged riots on Jan. 6 with unsupported claims of electoral fraud. However, some of the same media figures offer distorted accounts of this trial. The narrative can overwhelm the facts.

Moreover, if left uninformed of the real legal deficiencies in the case, that narrative is likely to control the response to any failure to convict.

These protests are part of a larger debate on racism in our country. However, this trial is about the actions of one individual – not society – in 2020. Those actions are increasingly favoring acquittal on the most serious charges.

Jonathan Turley, a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors, is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. He is also a legal analyst for Fox News.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2021/11/11/kyle-rittenhouse-tri
al-prosecutors-crash-and-burn-america-watches/6390215001
/

The original article has many embedded links in it which provide evidence and context for the author's quotes from others. You can go there if you want to follow up.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 15, 2021 3:56 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.



What are the facts? That's what I want to know.

Describing Rosenbaum as "belligerent" or "hyperaggressive" is no more helpful - to me - than describing Rittenhouse as a “trigger-happy vigilante". That kind of character assassination ON BOTH SIDES should never be allowed.

Here's what I wonder. If Rosenbaum grabbed the barrel of Rittenhouse's gun and was killed, doesn't that mean the gun was already pointed AT HIM and he was trying to deflect it? For example, if the gun was pointed up in the air, and I was trying to grab it, I would grab it from underneath, which would point the gun even further upward. OTOH if the gun was pointed down at the ground, and I were to grab it, I would grab it from above, and drive it further downward. Only if it was pointed directly at me would I grab it from the side and get powder burns on my hand (on my corpse). So wouldn't that make Rosenbaum's action defensive, and not the result of a "belligerent" or "hyperaggressive" nature?

Is there video? What are the facts?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 15, 2021 5:32 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

What are the facts? That's what I want to know.

Is there video? What are the facts?

Judge Schroeder ruled to exclude evidence in the form of a video taken two weeks before the events in question, purportedly showing Rittenhouse calling some people “looters” and stating that he wished he had a gun to shoot them. That seems highly probative of his intent two weeks later. Nor is it unduly prejudicial — it is an example of his own words, not some other form of extrinsic evidence.

https://web.archive.org/web/20211115174026/https://www.independent.co.
uk/voices/rittenhouse-judge-schroeder-prosecutor-b1957956.html


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 15, 2021 5:53 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I'm not sure if you are serious or not.

Plenty of lies posted elsewhere on this board on this topic.

There are no Assault Weapons in WI, not even the ugly mugs of Libtard women.

Until 2017, people needed to be 12 years old to carry a shotgun or rifle in WI, but then Gov Walker signed the Law eliminating the minimum age requirement. Handguns possession is a bit more murky. Cannon are legal in MI, but I don't think so in WI.

The rifle Kyle had was purchased in WI, owned by a WI resident, never left the State on the day of the attacks upon Kyle, and was never subject to IL Laws.

Many IL residents venture to WI to hunt and partake in celebration of 2nd Amendment Rights (which are much curtailed in IL). There is a popular bumper sticker which says "WISCONSIN: Illinois' Largest State Park"


Also, Trump had to call Gov Skeletor Evers and plead him to call out the National Guard (which Evers controls, as Gov) - because Evers didn't want to restore any civilized environment in WI (rioting in both Kenosha and WI, and this weekend in Green Bay)

Some have posted that Kyle is obviously guilty of some of the 6 charges filed against him.
Which charge(s)?

Libtard out-of-Staters and citislickers have blathered on about the weapons charge, carrying a dangerous weapon while under 18 years of age. They reference State Law which prohibits carrying short barrel shotgun or short barrel rifle.
Kids older than 12 can carry shotguns and rifles, and 13 year olds don't need a hunting license to do so.



Judge Schroeder stated that this law was complicated and he needed to review it.

So what charge did Kyle obviously violate?

My original quote was the 2nd post of this thread, on 31 Aug 2020. These facts I posted seem to have been ignored by the Libtards participating in this thread.

Sounds like the Judge finally threw out this nonsense charge, which was filed by the racist Libtard Prosecutor who had to be taught the Law by Rittenhouse during the trial.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 15, 2021 6:00 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


I have read that Kyle is part hispanic, I think it was 6ix who posted that. If true, any mention of that has been scrubbed by the Fake News Libtard search engines.



Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Judge Drops Rittenhouse Gun Charge, Finds He Legally Carried AR-15 In Kenosha

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/judge-drops-rittenhouse-gun-charge-f
inds-he-legally-carried-ar-15-kenosha


Or, for those who bother to follow the embedded link...



Quote:

Was Rittenhouse’s Possession of the AR-15 Unlawful?
Johnathan Turley

In covering the motions hearing last week in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, I noted a surprising comment from Judge Bruce Schroeder that he had “spent hours” with the Wisconsin gun law and could not state with certainty what it means in this case. The statement could effectively knock out the misdemeanor gun possession count — the one count that could still be in play for the jury after the prosecution’s case on the more serious offense appeared to collapse in court. A close examination of that provision reveals ample reason to question not just its meaning but its application to this case.

The unlawful possession of the gun has been a prominent fact cited not only by the prosecutors but the press.

At trial, however, prosecutor Thomas Binger at points seemed to be learning the governing law from Rittenhouse. For example, he pressed Rittenhouse on why he did not just purchase a handgun rather than an AR-15. Rittenhouse replied he could not possess a hand gun at his age. Binger then asked in apparent disbelief that the law allowed him to have an AR-15 but not a handgun and Rittenhouse said yes. Binger then moved on after seemingly drawing out a point for the defense.

The exchange was all the more baffling because it drew attention to the fact that one of Binger’s alleged “victims” was an adult named Gaige Grosskreutz who also decided to bring a handgun to the protests and pointed his .40 caliber Glock at the head of Rittenhouse when he was shot in the arm.

However, the most damaging moment came outside of the presence of the jury when the judge drilled down on the law. He told the prosecutors “I have been wrestling with this statute with, I’d hate to count the hours I’ve put into it, I’m still trying to figure out what it says, what’s prohibited. I have a legal education.” He added that he failed to understand how an “ordinary citizen” could understand what is illegal.

It is hard to understand how the count could be given to the jury without a clear understanding of what it means. It is also hard to instruct a jury on an ambiguous statute. Criminal laws are supposed to be interpreted narrowly. It is called the “rule of lenity” and has been around in the English system for centuries. For example, in 1547, the court was faced with a law making it a felony to steal “Horses, Geldings or Mares.” Given the use of plural nouns, the court ruled that it did not apply to stealing just one horse.

The problem with the Wisconsin statute is not a problem of pluralization but definition. It is not clear that the statute actually bars possession by Rittenhouse. Indeed, it may come down to the length of Rittenhouse’s weapon and the prosecutors never bothered to measure it and place it into evidence.

In Wisconsin, minors cannot possess short-barreled rifles under Section 941.28. Putting aside the failure to put evidence into the record to claim such a short length, it does not appear to be the case here. Rittenhouse used a Smith & Wesson MP-15 with an advertised barrel length of 16 inches and the overall length is 36.9 inches. That is not a short barrel.

Then there is the rest of the statute and ultimately the word “and.” Under Section 948.60(2)(a) (“Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18”), “[a]ny person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.” That makes Rittenhouse guilty, right?

Well, you then have to look at the subsection (c), which states that “This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593.”

Since there is no evidence that Rittenhouse violated Section 941.28, he presumably must be in violation of both sections 29.304 and 29.593.. The defense conceded Rittenhouse was in violation of Section 29.593, which requires certification for weapons. However, he is not in violation of section 29.304, entitled “Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.” As the title indicates, the section makes it illegal for persons under 16 to use firearms. Rittenhouse was 17 at the time and the prosecution has not challenged that fact.

If Rittenhouse were convicted on that count, it could face a serious challenge on appeal. Indeed, it is curious is why Schroeder would even submit the count to the jury if it is uncontested that Rittenhouse was 17. If that is the correct interpretation of the statute, there would be no way for a jury to reasonably convict Rittenhouse. It is akin to giving the jury a criminal count based on his use of force as a police officer when there is no evidence that he was a police officer.

The defense also offered legislative history to support the narrower interpretation but the prosecution opposed such reliance on material beyond of the language itself. However, that language is difficult to square with the charge and the evidence in this case.

Rittenhouse is obviously facing other counts. However, on that count, the question comes down to the “and.” To paraphrase Johnnie Cochran from the O.J. Simpson trial, if that clause “doesn’t fit, you must acquit.”


https://jonathanturley.org/2021/11/14/was-rittenhouses-possession-of-t
he-ar-15-unlawful
/

I have seen the one-armed bandit EMT testify, under oath, in this trial, that he did in fact have a handgun and pointed it at Kyle's head (which is the definition of Assault) so that he could get shot (don't bring a handgun to a rifle contest).
This sounds like there is no doubt whatsoever that he was violating the handgun laws of Wisconsin.

So, does this mean that the illiterate Racist Anti-Constitution Prosecutor will charge and convict him of this weapons charge? Or is the fact that he is white absolve him, and only half-Hispanics like Kyle get to be charged with Fake Charges?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, March 28, 2024 14:12 - 3411 posts
Well... He was no longer useful to the DNC or the Ukraine Money Laundering Scheme... So justice was served
Thu, March 28, 2024 12:44 - 1 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, March 28, 2024 11:18 - 2071 posts
BUILD BACK BETTER!
Thu, March 28, 2024 11:16 - 6 posts
Salon: NBC's Ronna blunder: A failed attempt to appeal to MAGA voters — except they hate her too
Thu, March 28, 2024 07:04 - 1 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, March 28, 2024 05:27 - 6154 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, March 27, 2024 23:21 - 987 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Wed, March 27, 2024 15:03 - 824 posts
NBC News: Behind the scenes, Biden has grown angry and anxious about re-election effort
Wed, March 27, 2024 14:58 - 2 posts
RFK Jr. Destroys His Candidacy With VP Pick?
Wed, March 27, 2024 11:59 - 16 posts
Russia says 60 dead, 145 injured in concert hall raid; Islamic State group claims responsibility
Wed, March 27, 2024 10:57 - 49 posts
Ha. Haha! HAHA! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!!!!
Tue, March 26, 2024 21:26 - 1 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL