REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

The Nazification of the DNC

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Saturday, July 24, 2021 08:49
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 5103
PAGE 2 of 4

Saturday, January 23, 2021 2:47 AM

WISHIMAY


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:


Am I imaging it, or is there a "See Spot run. Run Spot, run" quality about it?




Imagining it, no. Trying to come up with bullshit to bitch about, YEP.

Speeches aren't supposed to be understood by only the most intelligent, wordiest people. They are supposed to be able to be understood by EVERYONE, including the dimmest children of the dimmest Rethuglicans.


It's a great speech, and you are stellar asshole for trying to run it down.






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 23, 2021 3:19 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:


Am I imaging it, or is there a "See Spot run. Run Spot, run" quality about it?




Imagining it, no. Trying to come up with bullshit to bitch about, YEP.

Speeches aren't supposed to be understood by only the most intelligent, wordiest people. They are supposed to be able to be understood by EVERYONE, including the dimmest children of the dimmest Rethuglicans.


It's a great speech, and you are stellar asshole for trying to run it down.






Since you're a dim person, I would imagine that you thought it was a great speech.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 23, 2021 3:55 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


This is what I got out of Biden's speech:

Quote:

This is half of America's day.
Today, we celebrate the triumph not of a candidate, but of a cause, the cause of Democrats.
The will of the people has been heard and the will of the people has been buried.
We have learned again that Democrats are precious.
Democrats are fragile.
And at this hour, my friends, Democrats have prevailed.

So now, on this hallowed ground, we come together as one elite, invisible, to carry out the peaceful transfer of power to us, as we have yearned for more than two centuries.

We look ahead in our uniquely elitist way -- cold, calculating, dishonest and brutal-- and set our sights on the nation we want it to be.

I thank my co-conspirators of both parties for their presence here.
I thank them from the bottom of my heart.
You know the despondance of our underlings and the strength of our wealth.
But over the centuries through storm and strife, in peace and in war, we have come so far. But we still have far to go.
We the elite will press forward with speed and urgency, for we have much to do in this winter of peril and possibility.

Much to despoil.
Much to divide.
Much to subjugate.
And much to gain.
Few periods in our nation's history have been more challenging or difficult than the one we're in now.
A once-in-a-century virus silently stalks the country.
It's taken as many lives in one year as America lost in all of World War II.
Millions of jobs have been lost.
Hundreds of thousands of businesses closed.
What a wonderful opportunity for us.

The dream of interchangeability between all will be deferred no longer.

And now, a rise in populism, nationalism, and patriotism we must confront and we will defeat.
To overcome these challenges -- to secure our future in America -- requires more than words.
It requires propaganda.

Unity.
Unity.
Unity is the banner under which we will quell dissent and dissatisfaction.
When he put pen to paper, the President said, "If my name ever goes down into history it will be for this act and my whole soul is in it."
My whole soul is in it.
Today, on this January day, my whole soul is in this:
Bringing America to heel.
Uniformity across the land.

I ask every American to join me in this cause.
Informing on your neighbors, co-workers, and even family.
Using anger, resentment, hatred.
Extremism, lawlessness, violence.
Disease, joblessness, hopelessness.
With unity we elite can do great things. Power things. Money things.
We can do wrongs.
We can put people out of work from good jobs.
We can mold our children in state scools.
We can use this deadly virus to overcome resistance.
We can parasitize work, and make health care
secure for hospital corporations and pharma.
We can deliver racial injustice.
We can make America, once again, the leading force for money in the world.

I know speaking of unity can sound to some like a foolish propaganda.
I know the forces that divide us are deep and they are real.
But I also know they can be used.
Our history has been a constant struggle between the American ideal, and us.
Our victory is never assured.

Through the Civil War, the Great Depression, World War, 9/11, through struggle, sacrifice, and setbacks, our "betters" have always prevailed.

The people can see us, not as adversaries but as neighbors.
We can pretend to treat them with dignity and respect.
We can join forces, stop the shouting, and lower expectations.

For without uniformity, we will have no peace, only bitterness and fury.
No oligarchy, only a state of chaos.
This is our historic moment of crisis and challenge, and unity is the preferred message.
And, we must meet this moment by pretneding that we're for the United States of America.
If we don't that, I guarantee you, we will fail.
We have never, ever, ever failed in America when we have acted together.
And so today, at this time and in this place, let us start afresh to take control, and never let the people in the door again.

This sacred ground was not occupied by the people..
That did not happen.
It will never happen.
Not today.
Not tomorrow.
Not ever.
It is full of soldiers who will keep that from happening.

To all those who supported our campaign I am humbled by the faith you have placed in us.
To all those who did not support us, let me say this: Hear me out as we move forward. Take a measure of me and my heart.
And if you still disagree, I will bury you.
That's Democrats. That's my America.
Security.
Security.
Security.
Money.
Power.
And, yes, that's the truth.

Recent weeks and months have taught us a painful lesson.
There is truth and there are lies.
Lies we told for power and for profit.

And all of us here on this podium have the responsibility to maintain those lies.

Bumper-sticker speeches.
Empty promises.
Identity politics.
The enemy without.
The enemy within.
Unity.
Unity.
Unity.
Preach unity but keep up the war.

Without these lies, we will never prevail.

May God bless us in our endeavors.



Was that too cynical?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 23, 2021 4:30 AM

REAVERFAN


^ What else can a Russian troll do at this point?



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 23, 2021 7:29 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
This is what I got . . .

This is what I got:

a Republican lawmaker nearly brought a gun onto the House floor, further stoking concerns about Capitol security and whether members of Congress need protection from one another.

The renewed anxiety just two weeks after the deadly Jan. 6 attack was sparked by Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) when he set off a newly installed metal detector off the House floor with a concealed gun, despite a longtime ban on firearms in the chamber.

The incident followed numerous reports of other Republicans, accustomed to bypassing metal detectors in the Capitol, chafing at the new security measures. Some Democrats are now openly expressing that they don’t feel safe around certain colleagues.

Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.) said she never would have envisioned violence breaking out during floor debate when she first started serving in the House in 2015. Now, she says, it’s another story.

“You can’t be afraid that the person that you’re having a little argument with on the floor with C-SPAN watching is going to pull a gun and, like, shoot you,” Rice said. “If you had said that to me six years ago I’d say, ‘Whoever is afraid of that is crazy. That would never happen.’ Now? Sorry. All bets are off. It's a totally different climate. Totally different climate. And we have to recognize that.”

The metal detectors were installed last week after first-term GOP Reps. Lauren Boebert (Colo.) and Madison Cawthorn (N.C.) publicly discussed carrying their weapons around Capitol Hill. Both were also among several House Republicans who engaged in inflammatory rhetoric promoting former President Trump’s false claims of election fraud ahead of the Capitol attack that left five people dead.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/535505-capitol-tensions-running-hig
h-gun-incident-near-house-floor


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 23, 2021 8:50 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by reaverfan:
^ What else can a Russian troll do at this point?



It's very simple, REAVERBOT.

If Biden* meant what he* said about unity, he would

Tell Congress to stop the second impeachment charade, which is just as specious as the first and of even more dubious Constitutionality seeing as Trump has already left office

Appoint a Commission with real data scientists, programmers, and security experts including Trump supporters and vote skeptics to investigate vote irregularities - yanno, spend at least as much time on that as Mueller did investigating nothing; and draw conclusions about the last (2020) vote and recommend procedures which will make the vote secure and transparent;

Stop assuming that everyone who supported Trump is a Domestic Terrorist, because they're not;

Reverse his policy of aiming to make 11 milion illegal immigrants citizens (that's prolly by about how much he lost the vote)

Stop supporting a "Domestic Terrorism" law, which as just as undefined as Bush's Global War on Terror (fighting terror with more terror). "Domestic terrorists" can be handled under current criminal law when the commit crimes, like arson and terrorist threats. We don't need a loosey-goosey law to shred even more of the Constitution and terrorize law-abiding citizens, do we?

Amend Section 230 to require that platforms make a good faith effort to provide free, fair, and neutral spaces; and

Break up the internet giants.

*****

THAT would constitute a good-faith effort on his part to "listen to" and "respect" the apprximate majority of the country. But ALL of his efforts are bent towards (a) making sure that Trump or anyone like him never wins again and (b) make sure that any form of nationalism or populism is never discussed again. And BTW the establishment GOP likeMcConnell, Graham, and Cheney has the same goals.

If he* doesn't make good-faith effort to listen to, respect, and win the trust of the majority of voters (which he won't) then everything he* said was just blah blah blah lies, defamation, and hypocrisy.

Yanno, like you.


----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 23, 2021 9:53 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
This is what I got . . .

This is what I got:

a Republican lawmaker nearly brought a gun onto the House floor, further stoking concerns about Capitol security and whether members of Congress need protection from one another.

The renewed anxiety just two weeks after the deadly Jan. 6 attack was sparked by Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) when he set off a newly installed metal detector off the House floor with a concealed gun, despite a longtime ban on firearms in the chamber.

The incident followed numerous reports of other Republicans, accustomed to bypassing metal detectors in the Capitol, chafing at the new security measures. Some Democrats are now openly expressing that they don’t feel safe around certain colleagues.

Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.) said she never would have envisioned violence breaking out during floor debate when she first started serving in the House in 2015. Now, she says, it’s another story.

“You can’t be afraid that the person that you’re having a little argument with on the floor with C-SPAN watching is going to pull a gun and, like, shoot you,” Rice said. “If you had said that to me six years ago I’d say, ‘Whoever is afraid of that is crazy. That would never happen.’ Now? Sorry. All bets are off. It's a totally different climate. Totally different climate. And we have to recognize that.”

The metal detectors were installed last week after first-term GOP Reps. Lauren Boebert (Colo.) and Madison Cawthorn (N.C.) publicly discussed carrying their weapons around Capitol Hill. Both were also among several House Republicans who engaged in inflammatory rhetoric promoting former President Trump’s false claims of election fraud ahead of the Capitol attack that left five people dead.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/535505-capitol-tensions-running-hig
h-gun-incident-near-house-floor


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly




Good.

At least these fucks have to start living by the prison rules they forced our kids to live in decades ago.

Goose meet Gander. Fuck off politicians.


--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 23, 2021 11:14 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

It's very simple, REAVERBOT.

If Biden* meant what he* said about unity, he would

Reverse his policy of aiming to make 11 million illegal immigrants citizens (that's probably by about how much he lost the vote)

THAT would constitute a good-faith effort on his part to "listen to" and "respect" the approximate majority of the country.

If he* doesn't make good-faith effort to listen to, respect, and win the trust of the majority of voters (which he won't) then everything he* said was just blah blah blah lies, defamation, and hypocrisy.

Yanno, like you.

Signym, are you sure about what Americans want? I only asked because a Large majority of Americans want undocumented immigrants in US to be granted legal status. Signym, I'm unsure that you know what Americans want. You know what Trumptards want.
https://thehill.com/homenews/457180-large-majority-of-americans-want-u
ndocumented-immigrants-in-us-to-be-granted


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 23, 2021 2:15 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Granting legal status to illegals is a mistake which Americans will live to regret, because - like Reagan's "not amnesty" amnesty - it will only encourage more illegal aliens to sneak across the border.

And what about all of the OTHER points I made, SECONDRATE?

Investigate vote irregularities
Stop "domestic terrorism" law and stop referring to Trump supporters as "domestic terrorists"?
Break up internet giants.
Amend Section 230 to require that platforms provide fair, free, and neutral spaces.
End the impeachment charade, which is unfounded and unconstitutional.

Those would go a long, long way to prove that Biden is really listening to and respecting half of America. Because if he doesn't, he was just saying blah-blah-blah. You didn't address them, so I assume that you agree with them. And me.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 23, 2021 3:57 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Pelosi doubles down on Nazification

Quote:

“Aid and Comfort” To the Enemy: Speaker Pelosi Ramps Up Attacks On Republican Colleagues Amidst Calls For Expulsions
Speaker Nancy Pelosi ramped up the attacks on members of her own house this week, accusing them of giving “aid and comfort” to those who want to destroy the nation. The comments came after Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., denied a public accusation by Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., that she personally took rioters around the capitol for a tour before the attack on January 6th. Boebert pointed out that the “rioters” were her family members and she has never given such tours. Rather than encouraging colleagues to avoid baseless and inflammatory accusations pending review of what occurred on January 6th, Pelosi threw gasoline on the fire and accused her colleagues of giving “aid and comfort” to those who were trying to destroy the Constitution and the country. It is, in my view, another failure of leadership by the Speaker in her duties to the institution as a whole.



MORE AT JonathanTurley.org

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 24, 2021 12:27 AM

REAVERFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Originally posted by reaverfan:
^ What else can a Russian troll do at this point?



It's very simple, REAVERBOT.



You're a lying piece of shit and a useless Russian troll cunt. Kill yourself. Your life has no meaning or value to anyone.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 24, 2021 12:28 AM

REAVERFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Pelosi doubles down on Nazification

Quote:

“Aid and Comfort” To the Enemy: Speaker Pelosi Ramps Up Attacks On Republican Colleagues Amidst Calls For Expulsions
Speaker Nancy Pelosi ramped up the attacks on members of her own house this week, accusing them of giving “aid and comfort” to those who want to destroy the nation. The comments came after Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., denied a public accusation by Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., that she personally took rioters around the capitol for a tour before the attack on January 6th. Boebert pointed out that the “rioters” were her family members and she has never given such tours. Rather than encouraging colleagues to avoid baseless and inflammatory accusations pending review of what occurred on January 6th, Pelosi threw gasoline on the fire and accused her colleagues of giving “aid and comfort” to those who were trying to destroy the Constitution and the country. It is, in my view, another failure of leadership by the Speaker in her duties to the institution as a whole.



MORE AT JonathanTurley.org

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

More stupid fake news shit from a dumb, lying Russian troll cunt. Nothing you do or say is of any value to anyone. Commit suicide, now.

The murdering terrorists who attacked our government are all traitors to the US, and deserve a traitor's fate.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 24, 2021 12:30 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Pelosi doubles down on Nazification

Quote:

“Aid and Comfort” To the Enemy: Speaker Pelosi Ramps Up Attacks On Republican Colleagues Amidst Calls For Expulsions
Speaker Nancy Pelosi ramped up the attacks on members of her own house this week, accusing them of giving “aid and comfort” to those who want to destroy the nation. The comments came after Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., denied a public accusation by Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., that she personally took rioters around the capitol for a tour before the attack on January 6th. Boebert pointed out that the “rioters” were her family members and she has never given such tours. Rather than encouraging colleagues to avoid baseless and inflammatory accusations pending review of what occurred on January 6th, Pelosi threw gasoline on the fire and accused her colleagues of giving “aid and comfort” to those who were trying to destroy the Constitution and the country. It is, in my view, another failure of leadership by the Speaker in her duties to the institution as a whole.



MORE AT JonathanTurley.org

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

More stupid fake news shit from a dumb, lying Russian troll cunt. Nothing you do or say is of any value to anyone. Commit suicide, now.





Well...

This just got added to the archive.




--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 24, 2021 12:32 AM

REAVERFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

You really should do the same. You're a worthless piece of shit with nothing to show for your pointless, traitorous life.

You're dead weight, and a drain on society. Relieve us of your existence, and make the world a better place.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 24, 2021 12:34 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

You really should do the same. You're a worthless piece of shit with nothing to show for your pointless, traitorous life.

You're dead weight, and a drain on society. Relieve us of your existence, and make the world a better place.






This one too now.

Keep pretending that you're one of the good guys though.

You make Nilly look reasonable. You should be proud.




--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 24, 2021 12:53 AM

REAVERFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

You really should do the same. You're a worthless piece of shit with nothing to show for your pointless, traitorous life.

You're dead weight, and a drain on society. Relieve us of your existence, and make the world a better place.






This one too now.

Keep pretending that you're one of the good guys though.

You make Nilly look reasonable. You should be proud.


You're too stupid to exist. It's all for the greater good.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 3:11 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

On the Efforts to Silence Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity
Brad Bird
Commentary

Fox News Channel’s political commentators Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity are under attack, with many calling for their removal from the airwaves.

While this is perhaps a predictable extension of cancel culture’s ongoing persecution of those who uphold traditional values, the attack on these men is a particularly offensive attempt at censorship—a line in the sand.

This is because they’re among the few remaining voices in North American journalism with the courage and commitment to report views and facts that challenge the wisdom of progressive thinking. They also defended and respected President Donald J. Trump, who was endlessly and unjustly attacked and maligned by most in the media who betrayed the tradition of fair and balanced reporting.

Carlson and Hannity have been accused, among other things, of spreading “harmful propaganda and downright fiction,” according to one source.

This is rich, considering what the mainstream media has been doing in recent years. We need to understand this clearly: Carlson and Hannity make no pretense of being objective newscasters such as the late Walter Cronkite or the current Lester Holt. They’re commentators who present their opinions in the same way the acclaimed William F. Buckley once did.

The problem is that people who want just the facts can’t get them anymore in the legacy media, such as The New York Times, because it’s so tainted by wokeness, political correctness, and the anti-Trump parade. So they turn to Carlson, Hannity, and others such as Laura Ingraham for relief and common sense.

I don’t know Carlson or Hannity personally, and I’m not in the pay of either of them. I have never spoken or communicated in any way with either of them. I’m an independent Canadian writer, a semi-retired reporter/editor with more than 40 years of experience, including work in war zones and positions in Canada at both large daily (Winnipeg Free Press) and small weekly newspapers. At the age of 62, I don’t fear retribution from those who might wish to silence me for defending my American colleagues.

MORE AT https://www.theepochtimes.com/on-the-efforts-to-silence-tucker-carlson
-and-sean-hannity_3667979.html


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 3:35 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


EDITED FOR BREVITY

Quote:

If ‘Facebook is Private’ Why are They Feeding Private Messages of Its Users Directly to the FBI?

Matt Agorist January 22, 2021
Spread the love

...when Donald Trump was banned from Twitter and Facebook earlier this month, the left praised the move by big tech. “Facebook is a private company and can do what they want,” the pro-censorship hypocritical crowd chanted ad nauseum... Now ... Facebook [is] now willfully handing over private messages of Trump supporters who talked about the events at the capitol on January 6.

... [Honest media experts know] that large portions of the pro-Trump protests were talked about and organized on Facebook. But was Facebook wiped off the internet like Parler?

No, no it was not. Here’s why.

This week, Facebook began furnishing the Federal Bureau of Investigation with data on Trump supporters who discussed the events at the capitol on their platform — up to and including their private messages. Through this action the social media giant is acting as a de facto intelligence collecting arm of the US government.

In contrast, when Syed Farook, otherwise known as the San Bernardino mass shooter, wouldn’t unlock his iPhone for the feds, Apple refused to create a backdoor for them to access it acting as an actual private company supporting the privacy rights of its customers. But Facebook is more than willing to open up its data mining services for their friends in the federal government — because, as we have stated numerous times, Facebook is not private.

... in 2018 Facebook announced that it partnered with the arm of the government-funded Atlantic Council, known as the Digital Forensic Research Lab that was brought on to help the social media behemoth ...deci[de] on who they censor. [It] is directly funded by multiple state actors — including the United States — which voids any and all claims that Facebook is a wholly “private actor.” It’s funded by arms manufacturers like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing. It is also funded by billionaire oligarchs like the Ukraine’s Victor Pinchuk and Saudi billionaire Bahaa Hariri.


The Atlantic Council wields massive influence over mainstream media too, which is why when this partnership was announced, no one in the mainstream press pointed it out as the Orwellian idea that it is. Instead, headlines such as “US think tank’s tiny lab helps Facebook battle fake social media(Reuters)” and “Facebook partners with Atlantic Council to improve election security (The Hill)” were put out to spin the fact that a NATO propaganda arm is now censoring the information Americans see on Facebook.

... All the while, whenever the censorship acts in their benefit, half of the masses cheer it on and defend it, keeping resistance at a minimum.

... In fact, prior to the state getting involved in the talks of regulation into big tech, information flowed relatively freely with Facebook only removing racist and violent content. Now, however, as they bend to the will of their partners in the federal government, people like myself find ourselves on 30 day bans for saying “censorship leads to tyranny.”

This is why the answer to the government big tech censorship leviathan lies not in regulation but in boycott. The time is now to get off these platforms who spy on you, ban you, sell you to the highest bidder, and who are tearing society apart. ...

Spread the love



MORE AT https://thefreethoughtproject.com/facebook-private-company-messages-us
ers-fbi
/

This website recommend MeWe as a FB alternative:
Quote:

Millions of people have started shutting down their Facebook accounts and moving to MeWe.com. MeWe is an ad-free, censorship free, user friendly social media network that makes no money from selling your data, advertising to you, or violating your privacy.

MeWe CEO Mark Weinstein notes that they are leading the privacy revolution in social media. The social network has a Privacy Bill of Rights giving its users total control of their data and privacy.

There are no ads, no targeting, no facial recognition, no data mining, and no newsfeed manipulation.

Anyone who can navigate Facebook can navigate MeWe as its interface is very user friendly and has all the features one can imagine. But don’t take our word for it, MeWe was named a 2020 Most Innovative Social Media Company by Fast Company, a 2019 Best Entrepreneurial Company in America by Entrepreneur Magazine, and Start-Up of the Year Finalist at SXSW when it debuted in 2016.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 4:01 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


We never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most cases were dismissed for lack of standing ...



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 10:30 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Granting legal status to illegals is a mistake which Americans will live to regret, because - like Reagan's "not amnesty" amnesty - it will only encourage more illegal aliens to sneak across the border.

And what about all of the OTHER points I made, SECONDRATE?

Investigate vote irregularities
Stop "domestic terrorism" law and stop referring to Trump supporters as "domestic terrorists"?
Break up internet giants.
Amend Section 230 to require that platforms provide fair, free, and neutral spaces.
End the impeachment charade, which is unfounded and unconstitutional.

Those would go a long, long way to prove that Biden is really listening to and respecting half of America. Because if he doesn't, he was just saying blah-blah-blah. You didn't address them, so I assume that you agree with them. And me.

I will pick one point that you and Trumptards want from Biden: "Investigate vote irregularities".

Signym, you are smart enough not to say what typical Texas Trumptards are saying, but approximately 75% of the 74,222,958 Trumptards want Biden to prove Trump won. Nothing less will satisfy them. With the entire might of the Federal government's power to investigate, they believe Biden can once and for all time prove Trump won. But if Biden won't try, then Trumptards will continue to say Biden is NOT their President. Senator Rand Paul shows in the most sophisticated manner what cruder Trumptards want from Biden:

Even now -- after the inauguration of Joe Biden as the 46th president, after the January 6 riot at the US Capitol, after the myriad lawsuit dismissals -- Rand Paul can't bring himself to say that the 2020 election was not, in fact, stolen.

In an appearance on ABC's "This Week" Sunday, the Kentucky Republican was asked just that question by George Stephanopoulos. And here's what he said:

"Well, what I would suggest is -- what I would suggest is that if we want greater confidence in our elections, and 75% of Republicans agree with me, is that we do need to look at election integrity and we need to see if we can restore confidence in the elections."

Paul didn't stop there, though. After Stephanopoulos said that President Joe Biden won a "legitimate, fair election," the Kentucky senator interrupted to say this:

"I think where you make a mistake in -- hey, George. George. George, where you make a mistake is that people coming from the liberal side like you, you immediately say everything's a lie instead of saying there are two sides to everything.

"Historically what would happen is if said that I thought that there was fraud, you would interview someone else who said there wasn't. But now you insert yourself in the middle and say that the absolute fact is that everything that I'm saying is a lie."

This is a classic appeal to both-sider-ism by Paul. His argument goes like this: I can say anything I want and it's not the job of the media to litigate whether it's true or not. Instead, there should be another guest on the show who says the opposite of what I am saying -- and then the viewers can decide who is right and who is wrong.

Paul is right that journalism, for far too long, worked like this. Person A said something that was wrong -- based on the facts. Person B disputed Person A's claim, pointing to established facts. The moderator said something like "Well, a lot of heated views on this subject. Stay tuned," or something. And that was it.

Which, candidly, did a disservice to viewers and readers. Because while there are absolutely issues -- immigration, abortion, education, health care -- where reasonable people disagree and can cite facts to back up their respective arguments, whether or not the 2020 election was stolen is not one of them. The FACTS make clear it was not stolen. And opinions that suggest otherwise are just that: Opinions. And Biden won't be able to prove Trump won, therefore Trumptards will continue to have no faith in Biden on this or any other issue.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/25/politics/rand-paul-stolen-election-2020
-abc/index.html


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 10:38 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Trump did win.

Nothing can be done about it now. Oh well.


--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 10:50 AM

REAVERFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Trump did win.

Nothing can be done about it now. Oh well.



Stop lying. Biden won, fair and square. Accept reality.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 11:02 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK





--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 11:30 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Trump did win.

Nothing can be done about it now. Oh well.

Sure there is. The GOP Senators ought to vote to get rid of the Electoral College before 2024. Then a winner will be obvious next time. The way the system runs now, it is never obvious since a small number of whimsical "Independent" voters in key states are actually deciding who won in the overly complex Electoral College system of deciding the winner:

If Trump picked up the right mix of 42,921 votes in Arizona (10,457), Georgia (11,779), and Wisconsin (20,682), the Electoral College would have been tied at 269 all. The House would have then decided the election. Republicans will hold the majority of state delegations in the new Congress, and they undoubtedly would have chosen Trump. If Trump had also picked up the one electoral vote in Nebraska’s Second Congressional District, which he lost to Biden by 22,091 votes, he would have won the Electoral College outright. Back in 2016, Clinton needed to pick up the right mix of 78,000 votes in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to win the Electoral College.

https://www.cfr.org/blog/2020-election-numbers

While the GOP Senators are fixing the Electoral College, they should add the concept of a runoff election into the Constitution. Someday there might be a 3-way split for President. A runoff is how to handle that case. Close elections have happened before and the result was War in 1861 because Lincoln only got 39.8% of the votes. A runoff could have imaginably prevented that war. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1860_United_States_presidential_election

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 2:48 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Nah. If you go to a pure popular vote, California decides who is President for the rest of America's extremely short lifespan.


I won't even argue that the Electoral College is perfect in 2021, and I don't have suggestions on how to make it serve the public better than it currently does. But a pure Popular vote is a terrible idea. Hop in a time machine and ask the Ancient Greeks how that worked out for them.




--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 3:57 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Nah. If you go to a pure popular vote, California decides who is President for the rest of America's extremely short lifespan.


I won't even argue that the Electoral College is perfect in 2021, and I don't have suggestions on how to make it serve the public better than it currently does. But a pure Popular vote is a terrible idea. Hop in a time machine and ask the Ancient Greeks how that worked out for them.




--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.


The Electoral College was meant to assure smaller states that they wouldn't lose representation.

In a larger, more abstract view, it is meant to insure against "the tyranny of the majority".

As a Californian and registered Democrat, I used to get agitated that there were millions more people per Senator than in some other states. But I see the wisdom of requiring policies to be sifted thru several sieves, one is a popular one and the other sieve is state-based.

That way, policies MUST BE acceptable, not only to "the majority" but also to significant minorities.

Surely, there must be policies that are acceptable to nearly everyone. Negotiating and finding those areas of concurrence, that's the art of politics, is it not?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 4:35 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

The Electoral College was meant to assure smaller states that they wouldn't lose representation.

In a larger, more abstract view, it is meant to insure against "the tyranny of the majority".

As a Californian and registered Democrat, I used to get agitated that there were millions more people per Senator than in some other states. But I see the wisdom of requiring policies to be sifted thru several sieves, one is a popular one and the other sieve is state-based.

If a design doesn't work as intended, the design is wrong. The Electoral College doesn't work as its designers intended:

The drafters of the Constitution assumed that electors would vote according to their individual discretion, not the dictates of a state or national party. Today, most electors are bound to vote for their party’s candidate.

And even more important, the Constitution says nothing about how the states should allot their electoral votes. The assumption was that each elector’s vote would be counted. But over time, all but two states (Maine and Nebraska) passed laws to give all of their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the state’s popular vote count. Any semblance of elector independence has been fully wiped out.

The Founders also assumed that most elections would ultimately be decided by neither the people nor the electors, but by the House of Representatives. According to the Constitution, if no single candidate wins a majority of the electoral votes, the decision goes to the House, where each state gets one vote. Signym, that is where the smaller states are looked after.

After the unanimous election of George Washington as the nation’s first president, the Founders figured that consequent elections would feature tons of candidates who would divide up the electoral pie into tiny chunks, giving Congress a chance to pick the winner. But as soon as national political parties formed, the number of presidential candidates shrank. Only two U.S. elections have been decided by the House and the last one was in 1824.
https://www.history.com/news/electoral-college-founding-fathers-consti
tutional-convention
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

. . . That way, policies MUST BE acceptable, not only to "the majority" but also to significant minorities.

Surely, there must be policies that are acceptable to nearly everyone. Negotiating and finding those areas of concurrence, that's the art of politics, is it not?

There are NOT "policies that are acceptable to nearly everyone." I have had a front row seat in many engineering meetings where we are faced with two, three or more alternative chemical processes to make a product. The people in the meeting were absolutely passionate that their preferred solution be built. How do these meetings come to a decision?

Everybody in the meeting knows the company will not be building one plant for each process. Somebody has to lose and not get even a crumb of what they want from the meeting. Building nothing is NOT an alternative because the company has actual goals that must be reached or else everybody in the meeting is fired except for one group, who will build the one chemical plant. In American politics, doing nothing is always first choice, but nobody gets fired on the spot, with no waiting until the next election, because they insisted every detail must be as they want or else they will prevent anything from being built. There is no CEO in American politics that tells the engineers in the meeting that "If you make me decide which process we use, I will be firing those on the losing side. Make a decision, NOW! Or feel my Unholy Wrath."

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 4:40 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

On the Efforts to Silence Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity
Brad Bird
Commentary

Fox News Channel’s political commentators Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity are under attack, with many calling for their removal from the airwaves.

We need to understand this clearly: Carlson and Hannity make no pretense of being objective newscasters such as the late Walter Cronkite or the current Lester Holt. They’re commentators who present their opinions in the same way the acclaimed William F. Buckley once did.

The problem is that people who want just the facts can’t get them anymore in the legacy media, such as The New York Times, because it’s so tainted by wokeness, political correctness, and the anti-Trump parade. So they turn to Carlson, Hannity, and others such as Laura Ingraham for relief and common sense.

I don’t know Carlson or Hannity personally, and I’m not in the pay of either of them. I have never spoken or communicated in any way with either of them. I’m an independent Canadian writer, a semi-retired reporter/editor with more than 40 years of experience, including work in war zones and positions in Canada at both large daily (Winnipeg Free Press) and small weekly newspapers. At the age of 62, I don’t fear retribution from those who might wish to silence me for defending my American colleagues.

MORE AT https://www.theepochtimes.com/on-the-efforts-to-silence-tucker-carlson
-and-sean-hannity_3667979.html


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.



That the relentless "narrative" (propaganda) of the m$m itself is the reason WHY people turn to alternate sources is what I've been pointing out.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 5:19 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
If a design doesn't work as intended, the design is wrong. The Electoral College doesn't work as its designers intended:




Correct me if I'm wrong, but your solution to the problem is a pure Popular Vote.

That is a terrible idea.

I'm open to other suggestions.




--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 6:29 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
EDITED FOR BREVITY

Quote:

If ‘Facebook is Private’ Why are They Feeding Private Messages of Its Users Directly to the FBI?

... in 2018 Facebook announced that it partnered with the arm of the government-funded Atlantic Council, known as the Digital Forensic Research Lab that was brought on to help the social media behemoth ...deci[de] on who they censor. [It] is directly funded by multiple state actors — including the United States — which voids any and all claims that Facebook is a wholly “private actor.” It’s funded by arms manufacturers like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing. It is also funded by billionaire oligarchs like the Ukraine’s Victor Pinchuk and Saudi billionaire Bahaa Hariri.


The Atlantic Council wields massive influence over mainstream media too, which is why when this partnership was announced, no one in the mainstream press pointed it out as the Orwellian idea that it is. Instead, headlines such as “US think tank’s tiny lab helps Facebook battle fake social media(Reuters)” and “Facebook partners with Atlantic Council to improve election security (The Hill)” were put out to spin the fact that a NATO propaganda arm is now censoring the information Americans see on Facebook.

... as they bend to the will of their partners in the federal government, people like myself find ourselves on 30 day bans for saying “censorship leads to tyranny.”

... All the while, whenever the censorship acts in their benefit, half of the masses cheer it on and defend it, keeping resistance at a minimum.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.


Facebook is a social disease you have to make a point of catching. Anyone who depends on Facebook for anything is an idiot.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 7:05 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.



Quote:

The Electoral College doesn't work as its designers intended ...
The Electoral College doesn't work as you imagine. For numbers of electors, each state gets its allotment of representatives (population-based) plus its number of senators (2 per state).

There are 2 places in the Constitution that pointedly reject proportional representation.

One is the Senate. So, did the Constitution OOPS by creating an entire branch of the legislature - the Senate - where small states had the exact same power and representation as large states? Or instead did it try to account for the problems that strict proportional representation cause: ie, the tyranny of the majority?

Nobody needs to try and play imaginary 5-D chess in history to see that the composition of the Senate was a deliberate act to give small states the power to block the larger states, assuming that there were enough of them with a common interest. And it's obvious that was done INTENTIONALLY, to remove direct proportional representation from part of government.

The other is the Presidential vote that was deliberately withheld from the voter - along with direct proportional representation - thought the Electoral College. Do you imagine the entire structure and process of the Electoral College that did was done by accident? Because I seriously doubt it.

The people who who wrote the Constitution were a diverse but generally savvy group of people. And some things they understood clearly, one of which was that complete rule by a majority would be a tyranny for the minority.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 25, 2021 8:38 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Direct popular Presidential vote was considered AND REJECTED by the FF three times, as was election by the House (rejected twice) before they finally settled on the Electoral College.

Where the FF erred was not the mechanics of the Electoral College, but in the subsequent rise of political parties. The FF thought political parties were a pox on the body politic. So if you want to fix their error, get rid of political parties.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 27, 2021 7:15 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Biden* wants to reform the Supreme Court

Wasn't sure if this belongs in Nazification of the DNC or here, so I'm going to xpost this in both.

Making the judiciary hostage to a political party is what you might expect in Venezuela or Iran or Germany 1935, not here.
Quote:


POLITICO

Biden starts staffing a commission on Supreme Court reform
He pushed the idea as a candidate during the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation fight. Now, he’s getting it going.

By TYLER PAGER

01/27/2021 12:14 PM EST

The Biden administration is moving forward with the creation of a bipartisan commission to study reforms to the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary.

The commission will be housed under the purview of the White House Counsel’s office and filled out with the behind-the-scenes help of the Biden campaign’s lawyer Bob Bauer, who will co-chair the commission. Its specific mandate is still being decided. But, in a signal that the commission is indeed moving ahead, some members have already been selected, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions.

Among those who will be on the commission are Cristina Rodríguez, a professor at Yale Law School and a former deputy assistant attorney general in the Obama Department of Justice, who will join Bauer as co-chair. Caroline Fredrickson, the former president of the American Constitution Society, and Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and a former assistant attorney general in the Bush Department of Justice, will also serve on the commission, those familiar with discussions said.

Fredrickson has hinted that she is intellectually supportive of ideas like court expansion. In 2019, she said in an interview with Eric Lesh, the executive director of the LGBT Bar Association and Foundation of Greater New York: “I often point out to people who aren't lawyers that the Supreme Court is not defined as ‘nine person body’ in the Constitution, and it has changed size many times.”

Rodríguez’s opinions on court reforms are less clear. Goldsmith’s selection, meanwhile, is likely to be the one to frustrate progressives. A senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Goldsmith did not support Trump and is a friend and co-author of Bauer. But he was a vocal advocate of Brett Kavanaugh’s appointment to the high court — an appointment that sparked Democratic advocacy for expanding the number of Supreme Court seats.

“He will also be an influential figure within the Supreme Court building,” Goldsmith wrote in 2018 about Kavanaugh in a Time article titled, “Brett Kavanaugh Will Right the Course of the Supreme Court.” “He is a brilliant analyst with a deep scholarly and practical knowledge of the law. His legal opinions are unusually accessible. He is a magnanimous soul.”

Bauer, who is not planning to go into the administration full-time, is himself a proponent of term limits for federal judges. He has been helping with the creation of the commission and, according to a person familiar with the deliberations, initially proposed the idea of forming a commission to study the issue of court reform.

“The President remains committed to an expert study of the role and debate over reform of the court and will have more to say in the coming weeks," a White House official said in a statement.


The recruitment of members is still ongoing, but a source familiar with the discussion expects between nine and 15 members total to be appointed to the commission. Rodríguez and Goldsmith did not respond to a request for comment, and Fredrickson declined to comment.

The idea for a commission came together amid the push by Republican senators to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court in the weeks before the November election. Under intense pressure to consider reforms to the Supreme Court’s composition — including court expansion — Biden performed a classic Washington, D.C., punt. He announced in October that if he was elected, he would form such a commission to study structural changes. But Biden also conceded he is “not a fan of court packing.”

"The last thing we need to do is turn the Supreme Court into just a political football, whoever has the most votes gets whatever they want," Biden said in a “60 Minutes” interview in October. "Presidents come and go. Supreme Court justices stay for generations."

Oh, he* just said that to sound "moderate". Besides, Biden* isn't driving the policy-bus anyway. As soon as he leaves office, in a few months to a couple of years, the CIA-linked DNC will do whatever it wanted to do in the first place.

Quote:

Progressive groups pushing for court expansion responded with skepticism to Biden’s announcement at the time. And they’ve remained skeptical to this day.

“Commissions are often places where ideas go to die and there is no time on the clock to reform the court,” said Aaron Belkin, the director of Take Back the Court, a progressive group advocating for adding seats to the Supreme Court. “The entire agenda of what needs to get done is in jeopardy thanks to stolen federal courts.”

“We know,” he added, “that court expansion is the only strategy to allow the administration to solve the problems facing the country.”

An administration official said the commission is part of a broader court review and reform effort, part of which will focus on lower courts.

Progressives’ push to expand the Supreme Court was reenergized after Democrats won both Georgia Senate runoff races in January, giving them control of all three branches of government for the first time since 2010.

But any major structural reform would still be a heavy lift, as several Democratic senators have signaled their opposition to such measures. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Monday he was waiting for Biden’s commission to decide a path forward on reforms to the Supreme Court.

“President Biden has put together this commission to come up with a report in 180 days,” he said in an MSNBC interview this week. “We’re going to see what the commission says and go from there.”



Can anyone show me that the Supreme Court isn't functioning properly?
I understand there is a problem with the Federal level judiciary as a whole, but that is because appointments are often blocked for political reasons. Also, the various districts have different biases leading to disparate rulings on the same issue which need to be resolved by the Supreme Court.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 27, 2021 8:33 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Pack those courts Joe*. Just do it.

See what happens.




--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, January 28, 2021 9:44 AM

REAVERFAN






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 4:07 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


TULSI GABBARD: WE'RE MOVING TOWARDS A POLICE STATE



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 4:18 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.



Quote:

John Brennan: Biden Admin Has "Laser-Like" Focus On "Insurgency Movements" Of Bigots, Racists, Libertarians
Posted By Tyler Stone
On Date January 21, 2021

.@JohnBrennan: Biden intel community “are moving in laser-like fashion to try to uncover as much as they can about” the pro-Trump “insurgency” that harbors “religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists, even libertarians” pic.twitter.com/SjVXWhPhR8
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) January 20, 2021

Former CIA Director John Brennan ... on MSNBC ... highlighted several groups that are part of this threat.


BRENNAN: Nicolle, I was thinking today that this is the most relaxed I’ve been in the course of many inaugurations I’ve watched, because I’m not responsible for it, but I can tell you that when I was in the government, I had white knuckles because of the nature of the threats...But it’s so much more difficult today because of what we have seen, not just over the last two weeks, but that certainly has riveted our attention, but because of this growth in polarization in the United States and domestic violence and white supremacist groups.

Apparently the "mostly peaceful" BLM/Anifa riots, which caused many deaths and $2 billion in damages, escaped his notice?

Quote:

I know looking forward that the members of the Biden team who have been nominated or have been appointed, are now moving in laser-like fashion to try to uncover as much as they can about what looks very similar to insurgency movements that we’ve seen overseas, where they germinate in different parts of a country, and they gain strength, and it brings together an unholy alliance, frequently, of religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists, even libertarians.
Serious;y, dood, some guy in a horned hat looks like ISIS??? RU fucking kidding???

And, what's wrong with Libertarians? What's wrong with nativists?
This guy has got a fucking screw loose, aside from which he lied to Congress and to the American people.

Quote:

And unfortunately, I think there has been this momentum that has been generated as a result of, unfortunately, the demagogic rhetoric of people that just departed government, but also those who continue in the halls of Congress. And so, I really do think that the law enforcement, Homeland Security, intelligence, and even defense officials are doing everything possible to root out what seems to be a very, very serious and insidious threat to our democracy and our republic.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/01/21/john_brennan_biden_
admin_has_laser-like_focus_on_insurgency_movements_of_bigots_racists_libertarians.html


The most serious threat to our democracy and our Constitution comes from Brennan, Biden*, Pelosi and their ilk.


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 5:08 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Would YOU Be Considered a Domestic Terrorist Under This New Bill?
by Robert Wheeler

After 9/11, the entire country collectively lost its mind in the throes of fear. During that time, all civil and Constitutional rights were shredded and replaced with the pages of The USA PATRIOT Act.

Almost 20 years later, the U.S. has again lost its collective mind, this time in fear of a “virus” and it’s “super mutations” and a “riot” at the capitol. A lot of people called this and to the surprise of very few, much like after 9/11, Americans are watching what remains of their civil liberties be replaced with a new bill.
The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2021

The DTPA is essentially the criminalization of speech, expression, and thought. It takes cancel culture a step further and all but outlaws unpopular opinions. This act will empower intelligence, law enforcement, and even military wings of the American ruling class to crack down on individuals adhering to certain belief systems and ideologies.

According to MI Congressman Fred Upton:

“The attack on the U.S. Capitol earlier this month was the latest example of domestic terrorism, but the threat of domestic terrorism remains very real. We cannot turn a blind eye to it,” Upton said. “The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act will equip our law enforcement leaders with the tools needed to help keep our homes, families, and communities across the country safe....

The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2021 would strengthen the federal government’s efforts to prevent, report on, respond to, and investigate acts of domestic terrorism by authorizing offices dedicated to combating this threat; requiring these offices to regularly assess this threat; and providing training and resources to assist state, local, and tribal law enforcement in addressing it.

DTPA would authorize three offices, one each within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), to monitor

surveill groups for non-criminal, free-speech actions
Quote:

, investigate, and prosecute cases of domestic terrorism.
Whatever that is
Quote:

The bill also requires these offices to provide Congress with joint, biannual reports assessing the state of domestic terrorism threats, with a specific focus on white supremacists.
Because BLM, Antifa and other "protected" groups get a free pass on criminal behavior
Quote:

Based on the data collected, DTPA requires these offices to focus their resources on the most significant threats.

DTPA also codifies the Domestic Terrorism Executive Committee, which would coordinate with United States Attorneys and other public safety officials to promote information sharing and ensure an effective, responsive, and organized joint effort to combat domestic terrorism. The legislation requires DOJ, FBI, and DHS to provide training and resources to assist state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies in understanding, detecting, deterring, and investigating acts of domestic terrorism and white supremacy. Finally, DTPA directs DHS, DOJ, FBI, and the Department of Defense to establish an interagency task force to combat white supremacist infiltration of the uniformed services and federal law enforcement.


Those who read the bill aren’t so gung ho to shred the Constitution

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard has some serious reservations. In a recent interview on Fox News Primetime, Gabbard stated that the bill effectively criminalizes half of the country. (Emphasis ours)

“It’s so dangerous as you guys have been talking about, this is an issue that all Democrats, Republicans, independents, Libertarians should be extremely concerned about, especially because we don’t have to guess about where this goes or how this ends,” Gabbard said.

She continued: “When you have people like former CIA Director John Brennan openly talking about how he’s spoken with or heard from appointees and nominees in the Biden administration who are already starting to look across our country for these types of movements similar to the insurgencies they’ve seen overseas, that in his words, he says make up this unholy alliance of religious extremists, racists, bigots, he lists a few others and at the end, even libertarians.”


Gabbard, stating her concern about how the government will define what qualities they are searching for in potential threats to the country, went on to ask:

“What characteristics are we looking for as we are building this profile of a potential extremist, what are we talking about? Religious extremists, are we talking about Christians, evangelical Christians, what is a religious extremist? Is it somebody who is pro-life? Where do you take this”

Tulsi said the bill would create a dangerous undermining of our civil liberties and freedoms in our Constitution. She also stated the DPTA essentially targets nearly half of the United States.

“You start looking at obviously, have to be a white person, obviously likely male, libertarians, anyone who loves freedom, liberty, maybe has an American flag outside their house, or people who, you know, attended a Trump rally,” Gabbard said.

Tulsi Gabbard is not the only one to criticize the legislation

Even the ACLU, one of the weakest organizations on civil liberties in the United States, has spoken out. While the ACLU was only concerned with how the bill would affect minorities or “brown people,” the organization stated that the legislation, while set forth under the guise of countering white supremacy, would eventually be used against non-white people.

The ACLU’s statement is true.

As with similar bills submitted under the guise of “protecting” Americans against outside threats, this bill will inevitably expand further. The stated goals of the DPTA are far-reaching and frightening enough. It would amount to an official declaration of the end to Free Speech.
Soon there will be no rights left for Americans

In the last twenty years, Americans have lost their 4th Amendment rights, and now they are losing their 1st. All that remains is the 2nd Amendment, and both the ruling class and increasing numbers of the American people know it.

Dark days are ahead.


https://www.theorganicprepper.com/domestic-terrorism-act-2021/

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 5:25 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Where I see this going is very much along the same lines as the so-called Patriot Act.

Everything implemented under the so-called Patriot Act, from invading Iraq and Afghanistan, authorizing "enemy combatant" imprisonment, torture, extraordinary rendition, and black sites (GWB) and destabilizing the entire Middle East, killing American citizens without trial, secret drone wars, fostering the growth of ISIS and instituting nationwide surveillance (Obama) was either unconstitutional, unnecessary, or counterproductive ... or all three

We didn't need Bush's and Obama's Global War on Terror (GWOT) ... an endless, borderless, pointless, feckless money- and liberty-sucking execise in futility.

Everything done within the United States as terrorist act ... killing people, destroying buildings etc... is ALREADY covered by both national and international criminal law.

Just as there was no reason for people to completely lose their shit over Islamic Terrorism ... and in the process shred their own constitutional protections and make the international situation infinitely worse ... there is NO REASON to create a special category of Domestic Terrorist.

Are you making bombs? Are you conspiring to shoot people en masse? Disrupt essential services, destroy buldings, attack the police or Congress, make terroristic threats??

Guess what: IT'S ALREADY ILLEGAL.

The limits of free speech have been tested over and over. The lines of what is allowed and what isn't are already pretty clear, as are the lines defining things like assault, murder, rioting etc.

We don't need a special bill purpose-designed to infringe on Americans' constitutional rights, and to make NSA's current illegal surveillance and information-sharing legal.

But the DNC is stampeding people in that direction. Too bad for the DNC, half of America is already against it. (Which is why the DNC is working so hard to cement its grip on political power by suppressing resistance and importing new voters.)

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 5:40 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Oh, yeah ..

Cue "Russian troll cunt, go kill yourself" in 3... 2... 1...

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 9:29 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Where I see this going is very much along the same lines as the so-called Patriot Act.

Everything implemented under the so-called Patriot Act, from invading Iraq and Afghanistan, authorizing "enemy combatant" imprisonment, torture, extraordinary rendition, and black sites (GWB) and destabilizing the entire Middle East, killing American citizens without trial, secret drone wars, fostering the growth of ISIS and instituting nationwide surveillance (Obama) was either unconstitutional, unnecessary, or counterproductive ... or all three

We didn't need Bush's and Obama's Global War on Terror (GWOT) ... an endless, borderless, pointless, feckless money- and liberty-sucking execise in futility.

Everything done within the United States as terrorist act ... killing people, destroying buildings etc... is ALREADY covered by both national and international criminal law.

Just as there was no reason for people to completely lose their shit over Islamic Terrorism ... and in the process shred their own constitutional protections and make the international situation infinitely worse ... there is NO REASON to create a special category of Domestic Terrorist.

Are you making bombs? Are you conspiring to shoot people en masse? Disrupt essential services, destroy buldings, attack the police or Congress, make terroristic threats??

Guess what: IT'S ALREADY ILLEGAL.

The limits of free speech have been tested over and over. The lines of what is allowed and what isn't are already pretty clear, as are the lines defining things like assault, murder, rioting etc.

We don't need a special bill purpose-designed to infringe on Americans' constitutional rights, and to make NSA's current illegal surveillance and information-sharing legal.

But the DNC is stampeding people in that direction. Too bad for the DNC, half of America is already against it. (Which is why the DNC is working so hard to cement its grip on political power by suppressing resistance and importing new voters.)

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.




There's just as much reason to put Domestic in front of Terrorist as their is Hate in front of Crime.


--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 12:53 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

SIGNYM:
Where I see this going is very much along the same lines as the so-called Patriot Act.

Everything implemented under the so-called Patriot Act, from invading Iraq and Afghanistan, authorizing "enemy combatant" imprisonment, torture, extraordinary rendition, and black sites (GWB) and destabilizing the entire Middle East, killing American citizens without trial, secret drone wars, fostering the growth of ISIS and instituting nationwide surveillance (Obama) was either unconstitutional, unnecessary, or counterproductive ... or all three

We didn't need Bush's and Obama's Global War on Terror (GWOT) ... an endless, borderless, pointless, feckless money- and liberty-sucking execise in futility.

Everything done within the United States as terrorist act ... killing people, destroying buildings etc... is ALREADY covered by both national and international criminal law.

Just as there was no reason for people to completely lose their shit over Islamic Terrorism ... and in the process shred their own constitutional protections and make the international situation infinitely worse ... there is NO REASON to create a special category of Domestic Terrorist.

Are you making bombs? Are you conspiring to shoot people en masse? Disrupt essential services, destroy buldings, attack the police or Congress, make terroristic threats??

Guess what: IT'S ALREADY ILLEGAL.

The limits of free speech have been tested over and over. The lines of what is allowed and what isn't are already pretty clear, as are the lines defining things like assault, murder, rioting etc.

We don't need a special bill purpose-designed to infringe on Americans' constitutional rights, and to make NSA's current illegal surveillance and information-sharing legal.

But the DNC is stampeding people in that direction. Too bad for the DNC, half of America is already against it. (Which is why the DNC is working so hard to cement its grip on political power by suppressing resistance and importing new voters.)


SIX: There's just as much reason to put Domestic in front of Terrorist as their is Hate in front of Crime.
-------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

I agree. To me, the category "hate crime" is pretty meaningless. Does it make a difference if you killed someone because he was Hispanic, or because you were defending your drug turf, or because he and your wife were messing around?

Either way, the victim is dead.

I have the same difficulty with "degrees" of murder. Trying to suss the "why" of a crime seems a fool's errand. Many times, people do things for multiple reasons and quite often they don't know the real reason themselves. We see total lack of self-awareness here, on this board, every day; why should we expect any better from someone who has committed a major crime? There are only a few distinctions I would make about causing someone's death: was it by accident, on purpose, self-defense, or neglect? And I would probably give some consideration to HOW LONG it took: killing someone by shooting them is an instantaneous act, but beating them to death provides ample opportunity to stop.

And the best way to determine whether someone will commit another crime is to simply LOOK AT THEIR CRIMINAL RECORD. Psychologists can't predict any better than behavior in prison whether someone will re-offend, and BOTH of those are much worse than simply looking at someone's past criminal record at deciding whether someone should be given parole. Given that psychologists can't determine a convicted criminal's motives and predict future behavior, why would we imagine that a DA would do any better?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 1:12 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Just a reminder: Brennan believes that the Biden* administration has a laser focus on nativists, libertarians, and bigots. The first two are genuine political stances, and the third - while distasteful- is protected free speech.

Look at WISHY: She is the worst race and sex bigot here. SHE has a laser focus on race and sex, and yet, despite the fact that she has posted that she would genocide most of the world (down to the last 100) ... posts which COULD be used to justify putting her under surveillance and interpreting any future actions on her part as a "domestic terrorist" ... she is still allowed to be as bigoted as she wants to be because it's free speech.

And then there is REAVERBOT who has threatened other posters here ("You will be dealt with"). IT could be interpreted as a terrorist threat, and past posts could be used against it to treat it as a "domestic terrorist" and yet that is STILL free speech.

Even SECOND, who has advocated that people get guns and shoot their bosses. Distasteful, yes, and a history of those kinds of posts could justify treating HIM as domestic terrorist, if anyone where so inclined. Still, free speech.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 1:29 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
And reported by an occupied press



The hallmark of any dictator is that they're afraid of their own people

Nazification of the Democrap Party.

hmmmm.

Nazis copied everything the Democraps did, Democraps were their template and guiding justification regarding Indians/slaves/Jews, and all other aspects.

So now Democraps are returning to their roots. Almost circular logic.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 2:18 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Oh yeah, I forgot to mention ... Biden* is supposedy coming after "religious extremists".

What does that mean?? If you're a fundamentalist and believe in a 6000-year-old earth does that make you an "extremist"?

Hey, I think religions are hogwash, but our Constitution guarantees "freedom of religion". You can't surveil and jail someone for "bad thought" or organizing with others who have similar "bad thoughts" ... something in the Constitution about freedom of association.

You can't surveil or jail anyone who speaks or posts ridiculous ideas. Something in the Constitution about freedom of speech.

It's only when these activities become CRIMINAL matters does the law step in. (You can't claim that freedom of religion gives you the right to sacrifice humans, for example.)

This whole "domestic terrorism" thing looks less and less Constitutional the more i hear about it.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 4:24 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Turley,

There is a free speech debate at Drake University over hateful and vulgar tweets from Associate English Professor Beth Younger, who called for Republicans “to suffer.” We have seen increasing vulgar attacks from academics, including such high-profile figures as Laurence Tribe in the last few years. Notably, Twitter did not suspend Younger’s account for calling for harm to all Republicans. I do not believe that she should be barred from social media or fired from Drake as a matter of free speech. Even with professors who have justified the murder of conservatives or killing police are protected in such hateful expressions.

The solution to such hate speech is more (and better) speech. I would rather we denounce such speech than censor it

MORE AT https://jonathanturley.org/2021/01/30/republicans-need-to-suffer-drake
-professor-triggers-free-speech-debate-with-hateful-tweets-against-men-and-conservatives
/

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 5:08 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.




Quote:

John Brennan: And so, I really do think that the law enforcement, Homeland Security, intelligence, and even defense officials are doing everything possible to root out what seems to be a very, very serious and insidious threat to our democracy and our republic.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/01/21/john_brennan_biden_
admin_has_laser-like_focus_on_insurgency_movements_of_bigots_racists_libertarians.html

Quote:

Would YOU Be Considered a Domestic Terrorist Under This New Bill?
by Robert Wheeler
After 9/11, the entire country collectively lost its mind in the throes of fear. During that time, all civil and Constitutional rights were shredded and replaced with the pages of The USA PATRIOT Act.
Almost 20 years later ... Americans are watching what remains of their civil liberties be replaced with a new bill.
The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2021 ... authorizing ... three offices, one each within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), to monitor (Signy: surveill groups for non-criminal, free-speech actions), investigate, and prosecute cases of domestic terrorism.

Quote:

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard has some serious reservations.
In a recent interview on Fox News Primetime, Gabbard stated that the bill effectively criminalizes half of the country.
“It’s so dangerous as you guys have been talking about, this is an issue that all Democrats, Republicans, independents, Libertarians should be extremely concerned about, especially because we don’t have to guess about where this goes or how this ends ... When you have people like former CIA Director John Brennan openly talking about how he’s spoken with or heard from appointees and nominees in the Biden administration who are already starting to look across our country for these types of movements similar to the insurgencies they’ve seen overseas, that in his words, he says make up this unholy alliance of religious extremists, racists, bigots, he lists a few others and at the end, even libertarians."



Thanks! Biden*.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 30, 2021 5:54 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention ... Biden* is supposedy coming after "religious extremists".

What does that mean?? If you're a fundamentalist and believe in a 6000-year-old earth does that make you an "extremist"?

Hey, I think religions are hogwash, but our Constitution guarantees "freedom of religion". You can't surveil and jail someone for "bad thought" or organizing with others who have similar "bad thoughts" ... something in the Constitution about freedom of association.

You can't surveil or jail anyone who speaks or posts ridiculous ideas. Something in the Constitution about freedom of speech.

It's only when these activities become CRIMINAL matters does the law step in. (You can't claim that freedom of religion gives you the right to sacrifice humans, for example.)

This whole "domestic terrorism" thing looks less and less Constitutional the more i hear about it.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.



As long as your religion is Muslim, the Democrats are fine with it.

Everybody else is fucked.

Well... Tom Cruise will probably be okay.


--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 31, 2021 7:38 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.




Some people just have way with words ...
Quote:


It’s been a busy first week for the 46th President of the United States, there are the 20,000 troops occupying the capital city to organise, as well as the totally UNPRECEDENTED SHOW-TRIAL OF HIS IMMEDIATE PREDECESSOR.

You know, usual democracy type stuff.

But wait! There's more!

Buried, apparently in his Executives Orders avalanche is this:
Quote:

1. Vaccination Passports
International Certificates of Vaccination or Prophylaxis. Consistent with applicable law, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of HHS, and the Secretary of Homeland Security (including through the Administrator of the TSA), in coordination with any relevant international organizations, shall assess the feasibility of linking COVID-19 vaccination to International Certificates of Vaccination or Prophylaxis (ICVP) and producing electronic versions of ICVPs.

And there's his ...
Quote:

2. Cabinet Appointments
... Under Secretary of State is Victoria Nuland, a neocon warmonger ... Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, is also an inveterate US Imperialist, arguing for every US military intervention since the 1990s, and criticisng Trump’s decision to withdraw from Syria ... Defence Secretary is the first African-American ever appointed to this role, but Former General Lloyd Austin ... who retired from the military in 2016 to join the board of Raytheon Technologies

Not to forget MOAR WAR ...
Quote:

3. Iraq ...
... suddenly the situation was too unstable for the US to leave (Iraq), and Biden is being forced to “review” Trump’s planned withdrawal.
The Iraqi parliament has made it clear it wants the US to take its military off their soil, so any American forces on Iraqi land are technically there illegally in contravention of international law. But that never bothered them before.

4. ... Afghanistan ...

Turns out the US can’t withdraw from Afghanistan either. Last February Trump signed a deal with the Taliban that all US personnel would leave Afghanistan by May 2021. Joe Biden has already committed to “reviewing” this deal.

5. ... and Syria ...

Far from simply continuing the on-going wars, there are already signs Biden’s “diverse” team will look to escalate, or even start, other conflicts. Syria was another theatre of war from which Donald Trump wanted to extricate the United States, unilaterally ordering all US troops from the country in late 2019. We now know the Pentagon ignored those orders. They lied to the President, telling Trump they had followed his orders ... but not withdrawing a single man.

There will be no need for any such duplicity now Biden is in the Oval Office, he was a vocal critic of the decision to withdraw, claiming it gave ISIS a “new lease of life”. Indeed, within two days of his being sworn in a column of American military vehicles was seen entering Syria from Iraq.

... and more police, and more (baseless) mass surveillance due to
Quote:

6. Domestic Terrorism
'Nuff said. Keep your news tuned to official sources only, and your thoughts accepting and pure!


https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/27/6-warning-signs-from-bidens-first-
week-in-office
/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 1, 2021 10:15 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


It should be noted that the "diversity" picks of the Biden* cabinet have nothing to do with the sake of diversity at all.

It's about installing people who are high up on the protected class scale, so when they do things their decisions are beyond reproach.

We've already seen protected class Janet Yellen, former chair of the Federal Reserve, take advantage of this not even a week into the Biden* Presidency.

Legally, due to her previous title, she can't even "investigate" the bullshit happening in the DOW for another year, but that's not going to stop her. When she was asked about this during a press conference, she just completely ignored the question.


Watch protected class Lloyd Austin with the assistance of protected class Victoria Nuland go to war with anybody on the planet they feel like at any time without anybody even being able to question them because "how dare you!"




--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Thu, March 28, 2024 11:18 - 2071 posts
BUILD BACK BETTER!
Thu, March 28, 2024 11:16 - 6 posts
Salon: NBC's Ronna blunder: A failed attempt to appeal to MAGA voters — except they hate her too
Thu, March 28, 2024 07:04 - 1 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, March 28, 2024 05:27 - 6154 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, March 28, 2024 02:07 - 3408 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, March 27, 2024 23:21 - 987 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Wed, March 27, 2024 15:03 - 824 posts
NBC News: Behind the scenes, Biden has grown angry and anxious about re-election effort
Wed, March 27, 2024 14:58 - 2 posts
RFK Jr. Destroys His Candidacy With VP Pick?
Wed, March 27, 2024 11:59 - 16 posts
Russia says 60 dead, 145 injured in concert hall raid; Islamic State group claims responsibility
Wed, March 27, 2024 10:57 - 49 posts
Ha. Haha! HAHA! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!!!!
Tue, March 26, 2024 21:26 - 1 posts
You can't take the sky from me, a tribute to Firefly
Tue, March 26, 2024 16:26 - 293 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL