REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Your voting for Whoever, But Why?

POSTED BY: CREESO
UPDATED: Sunday, November 22, 2015 12:59
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 4585
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, October 22, 2004 6:12 PM

CREESO


So your going to vote for a candidate and you even know who it is (or for those in other countries, who you would if you could if you care). But why? Why are you really voting for that person? I have asked some Bush people why they're voting for him and many never could really give me a reason. So, here we are. Let us discuss why the candidates should get our vote. Lets try to give real reasons, and not “just because” kind of answers. Yeah, some of these will be an “I believe” kind of reason, but at least give something that supports that “I believe” statement.

Iraq, terrorism, and foreign relations top my list of what’s important this election. Therefore, I’m voting for Kerry because I never saw Iraq as a threat to America (if they could have shown me a reason otherwise, then maybe). We never should have invaded a country without some form of concrete evidence (which to my knowledge we didn’t have). Stopping terrorism should solely fall on our intelligence agencies and maybe some spec forces. The army shouldn't really be involved in the fight on terror. So besides invading and taking over every country that harbor terrorist, may harbor terrorist, or have very bad men as leaders; I think one of the best ways to guard against terrorism is to foster goodwill with other countries and respect beliefs different from our own. It seems that Bush has gone to the other extreme of the spectrum on this case. Kerry can perhaps give the US a new hope at restoring some of the recently degraded relations. After 9-11 America was confused, angry, and armed. We, including me, wanted justice for the wrong we endured. In search of this justice we seemed to forget to ask the very important "Why did this happen?" The why is what needs addressing, and the why seems to have a lot to do with our foreign policies. Oh, mayhap we should reevaluate our foreign policies and behavior.
Both candidates agree as do I that since we’re in Iraq we need to see this through to the end, I’m speculating that end is setting up a fairly stable country that can support itself. That could take awhile – and even though we could probably do it alone, we need help to do it well and faster. More help than Bush has gotten and seems capable of getting. Kerry perhaps can get more help; at least I feel he has a shot.

On the local front in no particular order:
I agree with Kerry (Bush holds the opposite opinion) that Gays should be able to have state recognized unions (not to open up a can of worms, but one should note that this is different from a religious union). In my mind, withholding these legal rights is the same as being discriminated against because of gender or color. I feel that most are born gay, and therefore should not be held accountable for something they cannot control.

Embryonic stem cell research has the potential to repair nerves, muscles, many disabilities, and some diseases. This is important research. The moral issues with this process, well that seems to be a barrel of unpleasantness. Even balanced with this moral grey, the good that it could potentially bring – wow. So I am for Kerry’s support of this research whereas Bush more or less opposes it (for his moral beliefs, which in this instance I'm ok with).

Social Security - Maybe something needs to change. Kerry seems to have little in the way of suggestion or plan. Bush said in the 2nd debate (?) that he is for partial privatization. This would probably work well if you’re for getting rid of SS altogether. For me and people just entering the working world, this idea sounds ok - though I still have my doubts. For those about to exit the world of work and those already drawing SS, this seems like it could be not so good. I admit I have little understanding of this, but the idea just sounds like a bad idea for a fix. Maybe I’m completely wrong here.

Abortion – I do tend to frown on this being used as birth control, but in situations such as rape I feel that it should be an option. So I tend to be more in line with Bush on this topic I suppose, although I think Kerry, in the 2nd debate, raised valid points that I hadn’t considered in explaining why he voted the way he did on Abortion issues.

National Debt – Bush has given me absolutely no reason to believe that he can control his spending sprees. The National Deficit is at or near an all time high, with no signs of slowing. Kerry at least has shown signs of being fiscally responsible. At least he actually preaches of accounting fiscally for new proposals. An example of his seemingly strong stance is that now famous I voted for it before I voted against it thing. He was completely for it, then it was rewritten to remove the fiscally responsible part and took out how they were funding the proposition. He then voted against it as a protest of irresponsible spending, knowing full well that it was necessary and would be passed anyway.

Finally is the negative campaigning. Discussing what a candidate has or has not done is one thing. Crazily blowing facts out of context and proportion to fit your needs is just ridiculous. Kerry and his campaign at least is taking current events and using those, granted with some spin but I haven’t noticed it being horribly off base or extremely misleading. I'm not saying they haven't, but I haven't heard or seen one. If you know of any that can even begin to compare with the Bush campaign let me know. The Bush campaign has taken this to a complete wha? The most recent example (which I have only read about) is the wolves commercial talking about how the weak are victims and Kerry voted to cut 6 billion dollars of intelligence funding. I admit this is a disturbingly stunning fact. But this fact is taken so horribly out of context as to be completely misleading and IMO should be illegal. This cut it refers to, Kerry did vote for in 97 or 98. That was prior to the LAST pres election. Things have changed a lot since then, so how this type of fact has any bearing on this election is completely beyond me. Oh wait, it shouldn’t. Though, since Bush stubbornly refuses to change his mindset given time and new info, maybe he does believe that this is still Kerry’s mindset.

This is all off the top of my head, and was something I was curious about. Mainly interested in the Bushies point of view as half of the nation is for him and I can't understand why, but hey all candidates and reasoning welcome! I tend to be a scrawny, lazy American so I got nothing as far as support in my ramblings. If you would like it, I can get it though.

Sorry about the length. I do want to say that I’ve read lots of threads here (I tend to be a lurker not a poster) and for the most part I’ve been impressed with ff fans ability to actually state arguments and give support. Not only that but they’ve tended to be very calm good discussions, not shouting hate matches. And that’s a good thing.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 22, 2004 6:40 PM

SERGEANTX


For me, one issue trumps all others and leads me to support a candidate I disagree with in almost all other respects. In my opinion Bush's neo-cons have perpetuated the biggest foreign policy blunder in our nation's history and are leading us down a path that will eventually end in the disintegration of our country, either from within or without.

For that reason alone I'm giving my vote, reluctantly, to Kerry. In all other cases I'd vote Libertarian and it irks me to do something I've always argued against, namely support the lesser-of-two-evils.

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 23, 2004 6:10 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


George Bush.

Because I don't agree w/ the Libertarian platform for national defense, and I do agree w/ Bush, somewhat. ( I voted Libertarian in 2000 )

Because the tax cuts worked, even if they were too small.

Because unemployment is down to 5.4% and more jobs are being creatd, even in Ohio.

Because there isn't a single thing of what I consider VITAL for the good of these United States that I agree with Kerry.

That pretty much sums it up.

Cilantro!

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 23, 2004 5:25 PM

WYDRAZ


Bush.

On one condition: we find Osama Bin Laden in the next ten days.

Yeah, I'm a dreamer.

What happened?

Remember 9/11? Osama claimed responsibility? We lost Osama, so go after... Saddam Hussein... Wha?

I want Justice, dammit!




Oh, and play Strange Adventures in Infinite Space. http://digital-eel.com/sais

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 24, 2004 1:26 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Osama might very well be dead. And remember, we sent troops in to kill / capture al Qaida a full year before we went to Iraq. Iraq was violating UN resolutions for 12 yrs and STILL was no cooperating. While they are seperate issues, that isn't to say one still didn't influence the other. We didn't go into Iraq 'because' we couldn't find Osama. Had we brought OBL's head on a stick in the 1st week of that war, we'd still gone into Iraq. Iraq is another matter entirely.

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 24, 2004 4:43 AM

TRAGICSTORY


I would strongly suggest not debating people's chioce of candidates. It never changes their opinion and turns the thread into a flame war.

Now I am voting for Badnarik. I am voting for him because:

1. I am sick of the US policing the world on my dime.

2. I am sick of foreign aid to other countries.

3. I am disgusted with the U.N.

In short I would rather have a government that will fix America's problems first.

-----------
"Societies are supported by human activity, therefore they are constantly threatened by the human facts of self-intrest and stupidity." --Peter Berger

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 24, 2004 6:25 AM

WASPFAN


I am voting for the President.



I could give reasons, but the facts are the republicans believe in less government and less taxes.

If you make $100,000 a year in this country you get taxed $60,000 of it (sales tax, fed tax, baseball park tax, etc etc). This was on one of the prime time news programs (20/20, Primetime Live). Also, over 85% of federal taxes are already paid by the top 6% of working Americans (20/20). So give a break to the rich, some people actually worked hard to get rich.

So if anyone thinks that taxes should go up, let me know?

Libertarian and Republicans alike know changes are needed from antiquated overtime laws to social security.

The only problem with the Libertarian party is they don't understand foreign affairs and want to do a Pat Buchanin on the world and just worry about ourselves. Good Luck!

If the Libertarian party (calling it a party is stretching it as well) wants to get more votes they need to be much more organized. There is so much in fighting that they don't have the means of methods of competing with the likes of Dem and Rep parties.

I agree we need more choices, but in two weeks we only have two. Bush or Kerry.

I think the choice is quite that simple.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 24, 2004 6:36 AM

CONNORFLYNN


I'm voting for Badnarik, which willultimately be a vote thrown away. I like his platform. Sadly in the state I live in (NY..which traditionally has been democratic), regardless of who I vote for ..my vote will be canceled out in one fashion or another.

More and more I realize this is because of the electoral process and the electoral college and the more and more I want to see it go away. I really hate the fact that our elections are controlled by special interest groups and regardless of who we elect from the 2 parties (all others tend to be of no consequence), the special interest groups are the ones who will be pandered to, and not the citizens.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 24, 2004 6:50 AM

CREVANREAVER


I'm also voting for Michael Badnarik. He wants the government out of Americans' lives, he's against the welfare state, he opposes censorship, he believes in personal responsibility, he believes in American sovereignty, he realizes capitalism is what makes America great, he knows taxation is evil, he respects the right to bear arms, and he's neither a Republican or Democrat.

That's enough for me.

http://badnarik.org/
http://www.lp.org/

By the way I agree with TragicStory about "not debating people's chioce of candidates. It never changes their opinion and turns the thread into a flame war." We should all keep to stating who we're voting for and why. No condemnation of people's choices.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 24, 2004 7:01 AM

CONSCIENCE

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 24, 2004 7:10 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I'm voting for Kerry, not because I particularly like his platform but because he isn't in some sort of imaginary world like Bush, and he stands a chance of winning.

I have yet to find my ideal candidate. If he or she existed, s/he would:

Get out of Iraq and focus on terrorism.
Eliminate all IP laws.
Withdraw from all "free-trade" agreements.
Re-write tax law to put individuals, small businesses and corporations on an even playing field.
Invest in energy conservation and alternative energy through low-interest rate loans.
Appoint Elliot Spitzer as the Attorney General.

Oh well, I could go on and on. Sadly, nobody seems to share my views!

BTW, I saw Mike Peroutka on public television and while I disagreed with some of what he was saying, I thought he was a principled and thoughtful candidate.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 24, 2004 9:24 AM

DAIKATH


I live in europe but here goes, if I'd be able and would want(its not my country...) to I'd vote for Ralph Nader.

Because even if only the Republicans and Democrats are the only parties which stand a chance of winning, Nader is the only other choice which has any real influence (as in if he would't be on the ballot Kerry would win).

Here in my country (The Netherlands, better known as Holland though that only represents two of the twelfe provinces)there are 8 parties in our senate. Whenever the elections are over usually the two biggest parties out of the elections are the only ones which will have the majority of the votes together (never does one party here have the majority). There are exepctions when other parties dont want a particular party in the government but thats a whole other story.

What Im trying to say with that last overly written paragraph is that the majority of the poeple should be acknolidged, through CNN's poll of polls Bush would have a small lead on Kerry while Bush has 49% of the votes. If the US would adopt another voting system this would not be enough if the other parties bonded together to form 51% of the votes.

Poeple who have spoken about Nader said that they didn't see it as a wasted vote but rather an investment in the future when poeple would have more choices.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:31 AM

WYDRAZ


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Osama might very well be dead.



Show me the corpse.

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
We didn't go into Iraq 'because' we couldn't find Osama. Had we brought OBL's head on a stick in the 1st week of that war, we'd still gone into Iraq. Iraq is another matter entirely.



That's entirely debateable. Regardless of the reason, as far as I can tell, we gave up on finding Osama. If we are still looking, I'd at least like to hear what our progress is. If it's "no progress", and if we don't find him, we aren't seeking justice, we're seeking revenge on those who have a vague connection to him.

A War on Terror is like the War on Drugs. It's unwinnable, because they can never all be eliminated. In every country there are terrorists, and as long as people are allowed to think freely, there will always be seperatists, terrorists, rebels, and yes, even Browncoats. But they are just labels for the extremes.

Find those who are guilty of specific crimes (like 9/11) and that is the best and most just action you can take.



Oh, and play Strange Adventures in Infinite Space. http://digital-eel.com/sais

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:37 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Ooo imma prolly annoy some folk, but what the hell...

Kerry, know why ?

It ain't even about mosta the issues, you see, I don't even truly mind the whole world conquest game, save for one pointed factor.

THEY BUNGLED IT.

We coulda used a combination of shyster diplomacy, assassination (c'mon, it's a time-honored *tradition* of american politics and foreign policy), economic squeeze plays to have everything we wanted, and if we'd played it right, they'd have been happy to give it to us!

Use someone else's troops as cannon fodder, then move in an 'secure' the resources you want, "ok, we'll take it from here, folks.."

Not all wars are decided on the battlefield, some are truly decided in the stock market floor, or the negotiating table - you use the best tactics for the situation, instead of going toe-to-toe in situations where your opponent has every advantage over you, and you DON'T let your ego prevent you from using allies to pick up the slack, even if you have to play nice with them for a little while, and you don't "stay the course" when yer headed for an iceberg, you change your tactics!

So, the current administration has completely BUNGLED the world conquest game, and like any employee who totally screws the pooch, they're gonna be FIRED.

As for third parties ? sure, they sound like they got a plan, but they DON'T... they come to a rigged game and play it by the cheaters rules, and then expect to get anywhere? PUH-leaze.
You can NOT 'play nice' in politics and win, it's a dirty, shameful business where an incumbent has EVERY advantage, from press coverage to gerrymandering - and the only way they ever really lose is if an opponent plays real hardball with em, and they're an incompetent bungler to boot.

There IS no 'play nice' that's gonna work when it comes to third parties, the only one even CLOSE to angry enough was Dean, and he allowed the press (fully in the control of the incumbents) to set his pace, his race - and paid the price for it.

I will not vote for a third party till they're angry enough and MEAN enough, to ram the iron fist of the american peoples' suzerainty down the throat of the politican machine till it chokes, and then put the big bad boot of the people up the rear of corporate american and the military-industrial complex that's turned us all into tax-slave fodder to feed the ever-growing beast.

Till they can do that, till they're WILLING to do that, no matter what it takes, no third party is worth my vote.

Don't get me wrong, I despise Kerry almost as I hate Bush the Bungler, but seeing how NO ONE has been punished or held accountable for this total FUBAR - it's up to us to get out the paddle and spank ole George right out of public office.

And if Kerry screws it up just as bad, IMPEACH his waffling arse - it's just that simple.
We pay them to get a job done, and if it ain't getting done, we need to FIRE them.

So here's to handing those bungling incompetents some pink slips, and a waffling idiot is the only thing we have to replace em, there's plenty more pink paper in my printer....

You are "We the people", the power is yours - play to WIN, for once, instead of playing 'nice'.

-F
(Umm, for them that don't already know, i'm an anarchist of the non-pacifist stripe, so take that into account here...)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 26, 2004 1:35 PM

THEGREYJEDI


I'm going to wait for the country to fall apart, then take over.

Either that, or whoever brings gas prices down about a full dollar first.

--------------------------------------------------
http://tomeofgrey.blogspot.com

http://www.jed-soft.com Gamer Rigs, Budget Prices

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 26, 2004 1:37 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Fremdfirma

YEEEEEEEAAAAAAHHHH!!!!

That's Dean yell, BTW. I guess I'm an anrchist too, since I am totally behind what y'all said!


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 12:16 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Osama might very well be dead.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Show me the corpse.



Daisy Cutters don't leave 'corpses'.

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 2:20 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Auraptor- My, but you change evidential requirements very quickly! One moment you're pointing to "mountains of evidence"

www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=18&t=7602

the next thing you're pointing to a void! Please, please, please- don't EVER work in law enforcement!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 2:25 AM

CONNORFLYNN


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Ooo imma prolly annoy some folk, but what the hell...

Kerry, know why ?

It ain't even about mosta the issues, you see, I don't even truly mind the whole world conquest game, save for one pointed factor.

THEY BUNGLED IT.

We coulda used a combination of shyster diplomacy, assassination (c'mon, it's a time-honored *tradition* of american politics and foreign policy), economic squeeze plays to have everything we wanted, and if we'd played it right, they'd have been happy to give it to us!

Use someone else's troops as cannon fodder, then move in an 'secure' the resources you want, "ok, we'll take it from here, folks.."

Not all wars are decided on the battlefield, some are truly decided in the stock market floor, or the negotiating table - you use the best tactics for the situation, instead of going toe-to-toe in situations where your opponent has every advantage over you, and you DON'T let your ego prevent you from using allies to pick up the slack, even if you have to play nice with them for a little while, and you don't "stay the course" when yer headed for an iceberg, you change your tactics!

So, the current administration has completely BUNGLED the world conquest game, and like any employee who totally screws the pooch, they're gonna be FIRED.

As for third parties ? sure, they sound like they got a plan, but they DON'T... they come to a rigged game and play it by the cheaters rules, and then expect to get anywhere? PUH-leaze.
You can NOT 'play nice' in politics and win, it's a dirty, shameful business where an incumbent has EVERY advantage, from press coverage to gerrymandering - and the only way they ever really lose is if an opponent plays real hardball with em, and they're an incompetent bungler to boot.

There IS no 'play nice' that's gonna work when it comes to third parties, the only one even CLOSE to angry enough was Dean, and he allowed the press (fully in the control of the incumbents) to set his pace, his race - and paid the price for it.

I will not vote for a third party till they're angry enough and MEAN enough, to ram the iron fist of the american peoples' suzerainty down the throat of the politican machine till it chokes, and then put the big bad boot of the people up the rear of corporate american and the military-industrial complex that's turned us all into tax-slave fodder to feed the ever-growing beast.

Till they can do that, till they're WILLING to do that, no matter what it takes, no third party is worth my vote.

Don't get me wrong, I despise Kerry almost as I hate Bush the Bungler, but seeing how NO ONE has been punished or held accountable for this total FUBAR - it's up to us to get out the paddle and spank ole George right out of public office.

And if Kerry screws it up just as bad, IMPEACH his waffling arse - it's just that simple.
We pay them to get a job done, and if it ain't getting done, we need to FIRE them.

So here's to handing those bungling incompetents some pink slips, and a waffling idiot is the only thing we have to replace em, there's plenty more pink paper in my printer....

You are "We the people", the power is yours - play to WIN, for once, instead of playing 'nice'.

-F
(Umm, for them that don't already know, i'm an anarchist of the non-pacifist stripe, so take that into account here...)



One word..SWEET. You hit the nail on the head. Unfortunately for the third parties, they just don't have the funding to get recognized. I'm voting for Badnarik, because I can't in any good faith vote for Bush( I'll import vaccines from Canada, but I won't allow the importation of cheaper drugs..what a shithead, with all due respect to the position) or Heinz Kerry (I mean comeon..how can you take anyone seriously that can marry a psycho like her, even though she has the big bucks to fund his presidential campaign LOL). I'm a firm believer , that if you don't vote..even if it's a protest vote or a write-in, you have no room to bitch about the results..and god knows I love to bitch.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:47 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Auraptor- My, but you change evidential requirements very quickly! One moment you're pointing to "mountains of evidence"
.

Actually, that is what I got my degree in. But you're comparing apples to oranges, and your segue from one to the other is not but a big non sequitur. OBL may or may NOT be alive. I've not made an affirmative claim either way on that one. As for WMD, there's no question what so ever Iraq had 'em, tried to hide 'em and likely DID scurry some out of country, or bury them in the Iraqi sands. That fits their M.O., and there's nothing to suggest otherwise.

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:54 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

That fits their M.O., and there's nothing to suggest otherwise.



Except a UN report, a CIA report, and complete lack of evidence. Anyway, let's continue this in another thread.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 22, 2015 12:23 PM

JAYNEZTOWN

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 22, 2015 12:59 PM

THGRRI


You opening up old thread after thread, most not supporting your anti Muslim agenda just so you can post hate is very telling. Your sick JAYNZTOWN and need some help. My responses to your posts in these links will be to explain that you are, as I said, sick.

Scientists believe that implicit racism is fundamentally founded on fear,

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
China
Thu, March 28, 2024 19:51 - 445 posts
Biden
Thu, March 28, 2024 19:42 - 851 posts
Russia says 60 dead, 145 injured in concert hall raid; Islamic State group claims responsibility
Thu, March 28, 2024 19:16 - 51 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, March 28, 2024 17:24 - 3413 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, March 28, 2024 17:20 - 6155 posts
BUILD BACK BETTER!
Thu, March 28, 2024 16:32 - 9 posts
Well... He was no longer useful to the DNC or the Ukraine Money Laundering Scheme... So justice was served
Thu, March 28, 2024 12:44 - 1 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, March 28, 2024 11:18 - 2071 posts
Salon: NBC's Ronna blunder: A failed attempt to appeal to MAGA voters — except they hate her too
Thu, March 28, 2024 07:04 - 1 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, March 27, 2024 23:21 - 987 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Wed, March 27, 2024 15:03 - 824 posts
NBC News: Behind the scenes, Biden has grown angry and anxious about re-election effort
Wed, March 27, 2024 14:58 - 2 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL