GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

The Reavers equate to Native Americans?

POSTED BY: NOVAGRASS
UPDATED: Monday, August 19, 2002 14:00
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 7313
PAGE 1 of 1

Saturday, June 8, 2002 10:40 AM

NOVAGRASS


If Firefly is indeed a Space Western, am I to presume that the Reavers are the space-age equivalent of Native Americans?

That's an interesting concept, I think. Are the Reavers going to be treated as mindless savages? I don't think they will... I think they'll be given some interesting impulses to their savageness. Maybe they'll be given an interesting cultural system.

Yet another potentially interesting aspect of Firefly, I think. What do you all think?

--Dylan Palmer, aka NoVaGrAsS--

... I guess it's a Joss thing...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 8, 2002 11:18 AM

SHAMUS


Man, I hope not! If we thought The Great Lesbian "Cliche" generated a lot of negative attention, think what that would do. *shudder*

I think the Reavers would be analogous to folks like the James Gang, who were left rootless and wild by the war.

Nothings exceeds like excess.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 8, 2002 11:55 AM

NOVAGRASS


I just bring it up because I *love* native American culture. The depths and intricacies of their culture is fascinating. At first, there were many hostile NAs... trying to protect their lands from the "evil" of the white man. I think that if the Reavers are indeed what the Native Americans are to American history, it would further develop the "there are no good and no bad guys in this story" theme that Joss&Co. seem to be running with. The Reavers might be trying to protect their "land," albeit with a lot of scary hostility, and not *simply* the savages the crew and their society believe them to be.

That's just an idea, I guess... I think it would be interesting, though.

--Dylan Palmer, aka NoVaGrAsS--

... I guess it's a Joss thing...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 8, 2002 12:17 PM

SHAMUS


Yeah, NA people be very, very cool. I'm right next to Ojibwa Nation land (share a property line). Inherently mellow folks who you really, really don't want to P*ss Off. It's an interesting combination.

Nothings exceeds like excess.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 8, 2002 12:36 PM

PANDORA


Quote:

Originally posted by shamus:
Man, I hope not! If we thought The Great Lesbian "Cliche" generated a lot of negative attention, think what that would do. *shudder*




The Great Lesbian "Cliche"?

Before I launch into a rather long and possibly unnecessary neo-feminist rambling, maybe you could explain?

Pandora

"Logic is a wonderful thing, but it doesn't beat actual thought." -Terry Pratchett, the Last Continent

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 8, 2002 1:09 PM

SHAMUS


Quote:

Originally posted by Pandora:
The Great Lesbian "Cliche"?

Before I launch into a rather long and possibly unnecessary neo-feminist rambling, maybe you could explain?



Many have accused Joss/ME of "punishing" the lesbian relationship by killing Tara. This is talked about as there being a cliche that lesbian relationships bring doom and gloom. ME has defended themselves as treating the couple like any other couple, without regard to orientation.

I agree with the defense, natch.

Nothings exceeds like excess.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 8, 2002 1:26 PM

PANDORA


Quote:

Originally posted by shamus:
Quote:

Originally posted by Pandora:
The Great Lesbian "Cliche"?

Before I launch into a rather long and possibly unnecessary neo-feminist rambling, maybe you could explain?



Many have accused Joss/ME of "punishing" the lesbian relationship by killing Tara. This is talked about as there being a cliche that lesbian relationships bring doom and gloom. ME has defended themselves as treating the couple like any other couple, without regard to orientation.

I agree with the defense, natch.




Natch.

Sorry to jump to the defensive, but I feel that Tara and Willow's love has been the most honest, non-political, non-sensational portrayal of a lesbian relationship on television ever, so I get kind of adamant about it.

As far as the Reavers are concerned, I think it would be very interesting to see them tackle a 'bad guy' from a perspective that creates a parallel to Native Americans, despite potential flak. What's probably good though is that I doubt the writers would ever make the correlation outright (or at least, not until the show had built up some steam).

JMO, though.

Pandora


"Logic is a wonderful thing, but it doesn't beat actual thought." -Terry Pratchett, the Last Continent

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 8, 2002 1:55 PM

ZICSOFT


Quote:

Originally posted by shamus:
Many have accused Joss/ME of "punishing" the lesbian relationship by killing Tara. This is talked about as there being a cliche that lesbian relationships bring doom and gloom. ME has defended themselves as treating the couple like any other couple, without regard to orientation.


I don't know about "many", and "punishing" is probably too strong. Basically, JW stands accused of recycling a standard Hollywood storyline, where some evil/troubled person seduces a good/troubled person into a relationship. No Good Can Come of This. Eventually the evil/troubled person dies (usually by her own hand) and the good/troubled person returns to People Who Really Love Her and Lives Happily Ever After.

The thing that ties evil/troubled to good/troubled is usually adultery:

http://www.tvguide.com/movies/database/ShowMovie.asp?MI=12541

But sometimes it's lesbianism:

http://www.tvguide.com/Movies/database/ShowMovie.asp?MI=12463

Some writers have tried to squeeze the Willow/Tara story into this mold. As Pandora points out, this is a very positive portrayal of a lesbian relationship. I'm not suprised that people see a hidden agenda in having it end so violently.

But the logic just isn't there. Tara wasn't just "Willow's Girl Friend". She was a person that became loved and trusted by most of the other characters -- who are all shown feeling some hurt at losing her.

This will all go away, in Season 7, since they obviously mean to continue treating Willow as a gay character. In fact, if you consider some of the hints the writers have dropped.... No, I won't go there.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 8, 2002 2:54 PM

SHAMUS


Zicsoft's explaination of "Great Lesbian Cliche" much better than mine. With footnotes!

Nothings exceeds like excess.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:19 AM

TLSMITH1963


I'm only just starting to watch Buffy (Season 1 on DVD), but I had heard already that Willow is a lesbian. It seems like they were dropping clues right from the beginning because in an early episode Xander says that Willow always gives him good advice on how to treat a woman. He also says that she is like a guy, which is stereotypical, but there you go!

Tammy


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:29 AM

HJERMSTED


For decades Hollywood stereotyped Native Americans as ruthless savages. In the past twenty years or so the industry has wisely moved away from the stereotype because A)Reasonable people of all persuasions saw through it and took offense to it and B)history simply didn't support it in the broad sense (violent tribes were the minority of the 500 nations).

In Firefly it seems there will be a group (The Reavers) that on the surface appear to be ruthless savages (though I remind you: nothing is ever surface-level in Whedon Country). I doubt there will be any "indian cliche" controversy unless the show literally states that these Reavers are indeed descended from Earth's indigenous cultures (and they would have to be from Earth originally because there are no aliens in this show). I seriously doubt that this will be the case.

The Reavers are probably more like violent pirates who have mutated (socially, intellectually as well as physically). I guarantee they'll be given depth and that one or two of the Reavers will explore the gray area between good and evil.

As for the gay/lesbian, black/white thing... I see the characters in the Buffyverse as individuals, not members of this social demographic or that. It's okay to point out a show's tendencies but drawing conclusions of racism or homophobia is a bit knee-jerk (emphasis on the "jerk").

As far as I can tell, Buffy had the truest portrayal of a lesbian relationship that we're likely to see on TV in a long time and last season women outnumbered the men 2 to 1 in most episodes. Plenty of white men have died on the two Buffyverse shows (two high school principals, a mayor, a mayor's assistant, Warren, Rack, Adam, Holtz, John Ritter... how big do you want this list to get?) but no one is decrying the "Joss hates Whitey" nature of that.

And rightly so. This show isn't about the isms or the tidy little categories that we put people into. Sometimes all that identity stuff can be quite limiting, actually.

Having said all that, I DO find it odd that these characters went to California public school all those years (and then on to a college in the same state) without making more black, latino or asian friends. The oversight, however, is institutional in nature (most WB shows seem to have this problem). Central casting definitely has a glitch somewhere.

mattro

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:14 AM

MALCOLM


Quote:

Originally posted by Hjermsted:
For decades Hollywood stereotyped Native Americans as ruthless savages. In the past twenty years or so the industry has wisely moved away from the stereotype because A)Reasonable people of all persuasions saw through it and took offense to it and B)history simply didn't support it in the broad sense (violent tribes were the minority of the 500 nations).

In Firefly it seems there will be a group (The Reavers) that on the surface appear to be ruthless savages (though I remind you: nothing is ever surface-level in Whedon Country). I doubt there will be any "indian cliche" controversy unless the show literally states that these Reavers are indeed descended from Earth's indigenous cultures (and they would have to be from Earth originally because there are no aliens in this show). I seriously doubt that this will be the case.

The Reavers are probably more like violent pirates who have mutated (socially, intellectually as well as physically). I guarantee they'll be given depth and that one or two of the Reavers will explore the gray area between good and evil.

As for the gay/lesbian, black/white thing... I see the characters in the Buffyverse as individuals, not members of this social demographic or that. It's okay to point out a show's tendencies but drawing conclusions of racism or homophobia is a bit knee-jerk (emphasis on the "jerk").

As far as I can tell, Buffy had the truest portrayal of a lesbian relationship that we're likely to see on TV in a long time and last season women outnumbered the men 2 to 1 in most episodes. Plenty of white men have died on the two Buffyverse shows (two high school principals, a mayor, a mayor's assistant, Warren, Rack, Adam, Holtz, John Ritter... how big do you want this list to get?) but no one is decrying the "Joss hates Whitey" nature of that.

And rightly so. This show isn't about the isms or the tidy little categories that we put people into. Sometimes all that identity stuff can be quite limiting, actually.

Having said all that, I DO find it odd that these characters went to California public school all those years (and then on to a college in the same state) without making more black, latino or asian friends. The oversight, however, is institutional in nature (most WB shows seem to have this problem). Central casting definitely has a glitch somewhere.

mattro


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 13, 2002 11:53 AM

ZICSOFT


Quote:

Originally posted by tlsmith1963:
I'm only just starting to watch Buffy (Season 1 on DVD), but I had heard already that Willow is a lesbian. It seems like they were dropping clues right from the beginning because in an early episode Xander says that Willow always gives him good advice on how to treat a woman. He also says that she is like a guy, which is stereotypical, but there you go!

Tammy



Interesting observations. One way of looking at it is that Willow was always gay, but the writers didn't know it until Season 4!

Then again why do we need to apply labels here? She doesn't go through the stereotypical BS where she realizes she likes scoping other girls. In season 4 (this is kind of a spoiler, but if you're reading this thread you can figure this for yourself) she ends one long-term relationship and begins another. The fact that one lover is a guy and the other is a girl is less important than her feelings for both of them. The important part of the story is the feelings, the love she shows for both people and they show for her. All the technicalities about "gay" and "straight" and "bi" are just that -- technicalities.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, July 3, 2002 6:40 AM

NOVAGRASS


Quote:

Originally posted by nine:
Quote:

Originally posted by Hjermsted:
unless the show literally states that these Reavers are indeed descended from Earth's indigenous cultures (and they would have to be from Earth originally because there are no aliens in this show).



Has it been said that these are humans and that they're from earth?
I know Joss was anti-bumpy-forehead, for cliche worth and a potential world take-over by the prosthetics industry.

But just coz all the actors remain unchanged, they might still be aliens, like everyone in space talking Americanised-English!

Besides which, if they were from a non-earth planet, that wouldnt make them aliens coz its only from their POV. Aliens would be anyone from another planet.

I also like the fact that my 'interstellar spaniards' theory has gained some more impetus. It was the only logical explanation for the horses to appear in Planet of the Apeas, and here they are again!

___________
"His thoughts were red thoughts, and his teeth were white."




While the people themselves are not *technically* from Earth, their species is human and originates from Earth.

Joss has explained that these are humans, that Earth has been abandoned/destroyed, and that they have spread out to many different planets. These planets are ruled over by two central planets (these planets would equate to Washington DC, I'd imagine).


The characters are all human, but Earth is gone.

--Dylan Palmer, aka NoVaGrAsS--

This one's for Furyfire...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, July 3, 2002 7:33 AM

TIEKA


Quote:

Originally posted by Novagrass:
Joss has explained that these are humans, that Earth has been abandoned/destroyed, and that they have spread out to many different planets. These planets are ruled over by two central planets (these planets would equate to Washington DC, I'd imagine).



With TWO central planets, I see a lot of room for conflict, confusion, and political turmoil. No matter how much like each other they are, or how powerful the individuals in charge, with TWO planets, there will not be true unity. I expect to find out that some "pirates" are actually paid by one planet to disrupt the other planet's activities. Which means that it is possible that one or more members of Serenity's crew could be working for the government. Just wait until the captain finds out.



Once you've been in Serenity, you never leave. You just learn to live there. --Firefly script

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, July 3, 2002 8:00 AM

MOJOECA


My guess is that Reavers are certain factions of colonists who fought alongside Mal. They're different from him in that they haven't given up, or refuse to.

They're probably engaging in postwar guerrilla fighting, terrorism. So the Native American connection still stands. Let me backtrack -- don't mean to say that NAs were terrorists. They intercepted supply lines and frontier people to hold their territory against increasing encroachment. Probably what the Reavers are doing.

--- Joe

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 22, 2002 12:19 AM

COMMONSENSEMAN


Well I just watched the Pilot, if you want to read about my views on it go check out the episode discussion thread area.

Reaver Spoilers
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
They do not give you much on the Reavers in this first episode. All you get to learn is they are bad mo fo's and most likely insane.

They are given a wide bearth by all and to run afoul of them is your worst nightmare.

As one crewmember said.

"They will rape you to death, eat your flesh, and sew your skin into their clothes, and if you are very, very lucky in that order."

So that makes an interesting mental picture to say the least.

Out........................

Shedding the light of common sense.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 7, 2002 11:46 AM

NOVAGRASS


"On the other side he has mindless savages called Reavers, which are a lot less complicated. You see them and you run. They're not monsters. What they are, are people who went out into space, saw the extraordinary nothingness and went completely out of their heads. They've become cannibalistic marauding savages. They're kind of like the Comanche in the old movies except without playing it as a racial thing at all, or even a cultural thing. It's a very personal thing. These are men who just gave up on the concept of humanity and are the scariest, worst, most awful serial-killing pirates who ever sailed around in burnt out ships in space. Everybody is terrified of them — Yeah, they're really fun ." (Interview with Joss from Scifi.com)

So, looks like he's going with the Reaver-Native American thing. I think it'll be interesting, to tell you the truth.

People will shout "racism!" but really, that's not what this is at all. The "savage marauder" is a key figure in western stories. You can't tell a long running western story without running into some sort of Native American figure sooner or later. It's just good that Joss has recognized this cliche early so that he can tackle it and turn it upside down, as he tends to do.

--Dylan Palmer, aka NoVaGrAsS--

The Ultimate Buffy-Angel Quote Generator™
Principal Snyder: "Are you a soldier?"
Xander: "I'm a comfortador."
Principal Snyder: "You're neither. You're a whipping boy, raised by mongrels, and set on a sacrificial stone."
Xander: "I'm getting a cramp."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 7, 2002 12:20 PM

HAKEN

Likes to mess with stuffs.


Quote:

Originally posted by Novagrass:
People will shout "racism!" but really, that's not what this is at all. The "savage marauder" is a key figure in western stories. You can't tell a long running western story without running into some sort of Native American figure sooner or later. It's just good that Joss has recognized this cliche early so that he can tackle it and turn it upside down, as he tends to do.



While not racism, I do have a slight problem with the idea of the Reavers. I know this is scifi and understands that the level of realism is skewed. However, when Joss uses Hill Street Blue as a point of comparison for Firefly, I have to ask myself whether his "mindless savages" characterization of the Reavers is just a bit too one dimensional and too cliched.

Even savages have culture, no matter how minute, for the purpose of self preservation--a core survival instinct. The Reavers may be vastly different from what we would consider civilized, but at the end of the day, when they're done raping some poor woman and bagging her kids for dinner, they have to go home to somewhere to be with someone and do familial things; perhaps even kick that newly won dicapitated head of the father around with the little Reaver kids.

The point is, the Reavers can't be completely mindless savages. Nothing can be that and expect to survive for long. Otherwise, they'll just dwindle and die off after a generation or less.

Unless, of course, some "civilized" group of people come along and slaughter them all first. Oh, that's right, that's not what this is about.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 7, 2002 12:57 PM

NOVAGRASS


Quote:

Originally posted by Haken:

The point is, the Reavers can't be completely mindless savages. Nothing can be that and expect to survive for long. Otherwise, they'll just dwindle and die off after a generation or less.

Unless, of course, some "civilized" group of people come along and slaughter them all first. Oh, that's right, that's not what this is about.



Well, I imagine that the mindless savage part was just an easy way to characterize the Reavers without going into too much detail. I have no doubt that they'll be more developed than simple mindless savages.

--Dylan Palmer, aka NoVaGrAsS--

The Ultimate Buffy-Angel Quote Generator™
Spike: "I could have danced all night with that one."
Buffy: "You think we're dancing?"
Spike: "That's all we've ever done."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 16, 2002 1:10 PM

SCROLL


Quote:

Originally posted by Haken:
Quote:

Originally posted by Novagrass:
While not racism, I do have a slight problem with the idea of the Reavers. I know this is scifi and understands that the level of realism is skewed. However, when Joss uses Hill Street Blue as a point of comparison for Firefly, I have to ask myself whether his "mindless savages" characterization of the Reavers is just a bit too one dimensional and too cliched.

Even savages have culture, no matter how minute, for the purpose of self preservation--a core survival instinct. The Reavers may be vastly different from what we would consider civilized, but at the end of the day, when they're done raping some poor woman and bagging her kids for dinner, they have to go home to somewhere to be with someone and do familial things; perhaps even kick that newly won dicapitated head of the father around with the little Reaver kids.



From what I can tell reading spoilers and interviews, Reavers don't have, as you say, "a core survival instict". Instead they are extremely suicidal and insane, having lost all humanity to the emptiness of space. They can't be compared to native people because they are not from one culture or race, but are a mob of crazy spacemen. I'm not sure the Reavers have any desire to do familial things at all.

Of course, I could be wrong, we'll have to wait and see.

Scroll.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 17, 2002 1:01 PM

ZICSOFT


Quote:

Originally posted by Haken:
While not racism, I do have a slight problem with the idea of the Reavers. I know this is scifi and understands that the level of realism is skewed. However, when Joss uses Hill Street Blue as a point of comparison for Firefly, I have to ask myself whether his "mindless savages" characterization of the Reavers is just a bit too one dimensional and too cliched.

Even savages have culture, no matter how minute, for the purpose of self preservation--a core survival instinct. The Reavers may be vastly different from what we would consider civilized, but at the end of the day, when they're done raping some poor woman and bagging her kids for dinner, they have to go home to somewhere to be with someone and do familial things; perhaps even kick that newly won dicapitated head of the father around with the little Reaver kids.

The point is, the Reavers can't be completely mindless savages. Nothing can be that and expect to survive for long. Otherwise, they'll just dwindle and die off after a generation or less.

You have a good point. But remember, this is Joss Whedon we're talking about. One of the big reasons Buffy works is the complexity of its bad guys.

Here's his characterization of the reavers from an interview:
Quote:

On the other side he has mindless savages called Reavers, which are a lot less complicated. You see them and you run. They're not monsters. What they are, are people who went out into space, saw the extraordinary nothingness and went completely out of their heads. They've become cannibalistic marauding savages. They're kind of like the Comanche in the old movies except without playing it as a racial thing at all, or even a cultural thing. It's a very personal thing. These are men who just gave up on the concept of humanity and are the scariest, worst, most awful serial-killing pirates who ever sailed around in burnt out ships in space. Everybody is terrified of them — Yeah, they're really fun [ laughs ].

The comparison with serial killers is interesting. Whedon keeps saying that Firefly characters will not be very different from people in the present day. That would seem to apply to the Reevers, unfortunately.

Full interview: http://www.scifi.com/scifimag/october2002/transcripts/

I have to say something about the portrayal of Indians in westerns. It's perfectly true that Hollywood has a terrible record when it comes to its portrayal of non-whites. (I simply cannot watch any Hollywood movie made before 1960 that features black or Asian characters -- the offense to human dignity is just too much!) But the fact is, I just don't see the "mindless savage" stereotype in all the westerns that are supposed to contain them. More typically, Indians are shown struggling valiantly, but futilely, just to preserve their way of life. Yes, the fighting was often brutal and cruel -- but Hollywood didn't invent that.

Ironically enough, these Westerns were actually drastically less racist than the popular culture that created and consumed these movies. One writer that was popular in this period was James Warner Bellah, whose stories were the basis of many John Ford and John Wayne westerns. One thing the movies left out was Bellah's characterization of non-Anglo groups as "dying races" -- a popular way to justify genocidal treatment of Indians and other groups, before Hitler took the concept to its logical extreme.





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 18, 2002 1:42 AM

TINYTIMM


Quote:

Originally posted by Zicsoft:
Quote:

Originally posted by Haken:
While not racism, I do have a slight problem with the idea of the Reavers.

You have a good point. But remember, this is Joss Whedon we're talking about. One of the big reasons Buffy works is the complexity of its bad guys.
I have to say something about the portrayal of Indians in westerns. It's perfectly true that Hollywood has a terrible record when it comes to its portrayal of non-whites. But the fact is, I just don't see the "mindless savage" stereotype in all the westerns that are supposed to contain them.


If the Reavers combine the worse characteristics of some "Native American" groups and my ancestors the "Vikings" (no squarehead jokes please) with heavy radiation thrown in as a sop to old SF flicks, you have a bunch of humans who are dead, know it and want to spread much pain and suffering to others before they go. Good villians, they won't be around long enough to develop a culture.

As for Hollyweirds portrayal of "non-whites" look at the current portrayal of Business men and "the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy."

Jeff
Who doesn't believe any good can come from stereotyping anyone.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 18, 2002 10:33 AM

ZICSOFT


Quote:

Originally posted by TinyTimm:

As for Hollyweirds portrayal of "non-whites" look at the current portrayal of Business men and "the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy."


Hey, I always thought that was spot-on! But then I'm a fuzzy-headed liberal. (Well almost, I don't drive a Volvo.) So I guess I'm just obeying my own stereotype!
Quote:


Jeff
Who doesn't believe any good can come from stereotyping anyone.

Except there are people who are to dumb to follow any story that isn't built around stereotypes. Probably not as many as Hollywood likes to think there are, but enough to keep the Rick Bermans of the world in business.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 18, 2002 10:48 AM

ZICSOFT


Quote:

Originally posted by TinyTimm:

If the Reavers combine the worse characteristics of some "Native American" groups and my ancestors the "Vikings" (no squarehead jokes please) with heavy radiation thrown in as a sop to old SF flicks, you have a bunch of humans who are dead, know it and want to spread much pain and suffering to others before they go. Good villians, they won't be around long enough to develop a culture.


Hey, remember the computer piracy issue of Byte? The cover was a Viking ship with a 5-1/4" floppy instead of a sail. (Scary thought. Is anybody here besides Jeff and me old enough to remember 5-1/4" floppies?) Naturally they got complaints from the Norwegian Anti-Defamation League.

Radiation is an interesting issue. Since JW is bent on doing "hard" SF, I might have expected him to leave out the traditional mutant monsters. It's bad science -- mutation means minor changes, not instant transformation into an X-Man.

Then again, JW wrote one of the scripts for that movie, though they mostly discarded his work. And he Fray, he couldn't resist having all kinds of weird mutants walking around (or swiming -- one character, Gunther, is a green guy with gills, who lives in a giant fish tank) just so his demon characters would have a hard time convincing people they weren't mutants.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 18, 2002 1:11 PM

SHUGGIE


Quote:

Originally posted by Zicsoft:
(Scary thought. Is anybody here besides Jeff and me old enough to remember 5-1/4" floppies?)



Hey I remember 8" floppies!

Quote:

Since JW is bent on doing "hard" SF,


Has Joss ever said this? To be honest the only place I've ever heard this is here on this board from you Zic.

I mean I don't really care either way so long as it's entertaining.

Shug

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 18, 2002 4:11 PM

ZICSOFT


Uh, Shuggie, no offense, but that's kind of a nasty thing to say. You're implying that I'm either a liar or delusional. The next time you want to raise this kind of issue, the polite way to say it would be "I think you're wrong. Where did you hear Joss actually say that?" Which is when I'd point you at:

http://168.215.229.9/thread.asp?b=9&t=380


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 18, 2002 9:21 PM

SHUGGIE


Zic,

I wasn't implying that you were lying or delusional. I had no intention of being impolite - if I came over that way then I apologize.

I admit I was sceptical that doing 'hard SF' would be a priority for Joss - it doesn't seem to fit with his prior work. But that quote is very plain so I was wrong about that.

Shug

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 19, 2002 8:00 AM

ZICSOFT


Quote:

Originally posted by Shuggie:
Zic,

I wasn't implying that you were lying or delusional. I had no intention of being impolite - if I came over that way then I apologize.

I admit I was sceptical that doing 'hard SF' would be a priority for Joss - it doesn't seem to fit with his prior work. But that quote is very plain so I was wrong about that.

Shug

Well, OK, I won't have you killed.

You know, just because Buffy is fantasy/horror, doesn't mean it doesn't have rigorous underpinnings. Fantasy writers can be just as bad as hard-SF writers that way. Look at all the work Tolkien put into the LOTR backstory. And Tolkien was a technophobe, which Whedon most certainly is not. So it's true that he's never done hard SF before -- but his previous work isn't that different.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 19, 2002 10:22 AM

TINYTIMM


Quote:

Originally posted by Zicsoft:
Quote:

Originally posted by TinyTimm:

As for Hollyweirds portrayal of "non-whites" look at the current portrayal of Business men and "the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy."


Hey, I always thought that was spot-on! But then I'm a fuzzy-headed liberal. (Well almost, I don't drive a Volvo.) So I guess I'm just obeying my own stereotype!


Keep current man! Liberals drive Subarus like me (OK the wife gets the new Subie, I get the old Van)

Jeff
Who scored farther left on the scale than his wife.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 19, 2002 10:29 AM

TINYTIMM


Quote:

Originally posted by Zicsoft:
[Hey, remember the computer piracy issue of Byte? The cover was a Viking ship with a 5-1/4" floppy instead of a sail. (Scary thought. Is anybody here besides Jeff and me old enough to remember 5-1/4" floppies?)


Hey! I BOUGHT 8" floppies for a DEDICATED WORD PROCESSOR! And ribbons and daisywheels as well.

Quote:

Radiation is an interesting issue. Since JW is bent on doing "hard" SF, I might have expected him to leave out the traditional mutant monsters. It's bad science -- mutation means minor changes, not instant transformation into an X-Man.


The radiation effects on the Reavers would be considerable pain, insanity, combined with the drugs needed to dull the pain, and the sure knowlege they are gonna die real soon and NOTHING they do matters.

Jeff
Who spent a number of years learning about the effects of chemistry and radiation on humans.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 19, 2002 11:00 AM

HAKEN

Likes to mess with stuffs.


Quote:

Originally posted by Zicsoft:
Is anybody here besides Jeff and me old enough to remember 5-1/4" floppies?)



I'm not old at all, I was one of those snotty nose little kids who just liked playing video games and owned my first home computer back in 1979. It was an Atari 800 with 48K of RAM and a 80K disk drive.

In school, I messed with the Apples and TRS-80s. And during a summer job I even got to play with the boss's IMSAI, which to this day, I'm told, still runs. After that, it's a bunch of CP/M boxes, mainframes like the PDPs and IBM System whatevers, then finally to the IBM PC with DOS and eventually Windows.

It's really kinda hilarious sometimes when I talk about the good'ole days to people 2 or 3 times my age. Oh, and remember the movie War Games? We did all that stuff and then some. Remember all the fun with Captain Crunch?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 19, 2002 2:00 PM

ZICSOFT


The last time I picked up a Tom Clancey (the one where Jack Ryan becomes President -- now that's a scary thought!), he made quite a good case for Volvos as the fuzzy-head car. People who have silly qualms about guns and other security measures drive them for the illusion of safety. Lot of good it does you when the terrorists are out to destroy your way of life!


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL