GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Current Ancestor of 'Companions'?

POSTED BY: AGENTROUKA
UPDATED: Tuesday, October 5, 2010 11:07
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1501
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 3:23 AM

AGENTROUKA


Rentafriend!

Quote:


"I moved to New York from Los Angeles a year ago and I thought this would be a good way to make friends," says Jenny.

Over lunch we chat about where we're from, our families and our interests, just as you would on a first date. It feels like a strangely formal way to get to know a complete stranger, but in New York people are forever striking up conversations with people they've just met.

As the weirdness of the situation subsides and we start to chat about everything from astrology to literature and politics, it becomes apparent we have a lot in common.

It could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship, but it was all arranged online via Rentafriend.com. And if I want to see her again it'll be in the knowledge that I have to pick up the tab.




http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-11465260


Reminded me of Inara's profession, in a way. Renting the service of someone's entertaining company. If you're not overtly particular about sexual intimacy then fusing this with regular prostitution, a spiritual component and a super-influential union should result in... Companions?

Thoughts?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 4:03 AM

BYTEMITE


This will almost certainly have legal action against it soon. I suspect opposite sex hook ups are the most common, just by the most likely target demographic here, and by the natural progression of this particular business model.

You can bet the NYPD is already looking for any sign of shenanigans, which are pretty much inevitable.

That said, they sound a little like Geisha for now, only without all the face paint, kimonos, or tea ceremony stuff.

The union would probably have to come next, then the spiritual element as a PR campaign.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 4:25 AM

AGENTROUKA


Good point!

Quote:

The union would probably have to come next, then the spiritual element as a PR campaign.


Agree about the unions, not so much the PR campaign. I don't think Inara's spiritual bend is a facade, so I don't think it is taught as one, which makes me think that it would more have to evolve as a particular school of thought within the organisation that ends up strong enough to make policy decisions about training and "company culture".

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 4:27 AM

ZEEK


Very strange service. About the only time I could see that being useful is work functions where you don't get along with your co-workers and just want someone there to save you from awkward conversations. Granted you should probably just get a friend to go with you but if you can't work out the schedule or something I guess this works.

Hiring a friend to just have lunch with or something seems really odd. I don't know why anyone would feel the need to hire someone. Especially since the article talks about how they operate in big cities. How does a big city make it harder to meet people? There are people everywhere. A small town is much more difficult to meet people with your interests IMO.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 4:33 AM

WISHIMAY


That sounds like a great idea! A way to meet people and be sociable but in a way keep the friendship professional...

I totally understand Mal's position about loyalty towards the people who are on his Crew, as I have been stabbed in the back by waaaay too many people who called themselves my friend, so keeping it to a professional level has a certain appeal- you are only as much a friend as you want to be, without the risk... If they aren't the kind of people you want to be friends with you can cut bait and run, no harm, no foul...
Kinda hard to weed out the perv's though.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 4:43 AM

AGENTROUKA


Wishimay,

that's an intriguing comparison. Combining that with Mal's attitude about Inara's profession makes it doubly interesting.

He accuses her of selling love as a lie, when he himself is using his position as captain as a tool to keep things "professional" that really aren't. Loyalty and closeness - but no real committment. In some way, he is paying people to be his less complicated family.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 4:51 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Good point!

Quote:

The union would probably have to come next, then the spiritual element as a PR campaign.


Agree about the unions, not so much the PR campaign. I don't think Inara's spiritual bend is a facade, so I don't think it is taught as one, which makes me think that it would more have to evolve as a particular school of thought within the organisation that ends up strong enough to make policy decisions about training and "company culture".



Well, they believe it NOW, but look how much of it seems to be hokey new-age-isms. That suggests to me that started out as a business decision and PR campaign, which are rarely ever spiritual, and if the appearance of spiritualism is necessary, they tend to just grab on to whatever facsimile is available at the time.

The question that needs to be asked here is why would they NEED to unionize, and the answer is most likely acceptance. So PR would be vital. As they trained companions later on to believe the PR, it would slowly over the years become real and a part of companion culture.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 5:02 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

but look how much of it seems to be hokey new-age-isms.


Like what?

Seems like too radical and unnecessary a shift for me, to artificially create all spiritual reference for the sake of "PR" out of nowhere and invent a philosophy to teach all new students, who would if course all be too naive to ever question where it came from upon examining Guild history. That would also imply all member of that union were happy to be frauds, which is a pretty harsh accusation.

I guess if this is going to go down a "the Guild MUST be bad because it is a large organisation" road then we should agree to disagree now.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 5:04 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

He accuses her of selling love as a lie, when he himself is using his position as captain as a tool to keep things "professional" that really aren't. Loyalty and closeness - but no real committment. In some way, he is paying people to be his less complicated family.


This is something I've thought about as well, though I'm not sure I'd say the attraction for Mal is a lack of commitment. A lot of the Independents were volunteers (Mal), but some of them actually were career soldiers (Zoe). I'd definitely argue he had some strong commitment to his soldiers, even the ones who maybe were there just for pay (not that Zoe was, but others probably were).

He seems to have that same commitment to his crew, judging by his taking River and Simon back in during the movie, and going to rescue Inara, and his very real reaction when Book is shot (both in the series and the movie). He holds himself responsible, maybe too much.

Fortunately for him, his crew returns that commitment (as in War Stories), or his paying for a family would come off quite a bit more tragic and delusional. As it is, his paying them really comes off as more like a father giving his kids an allowance. Look how many times he threatens to dock their pay, and never really does, and I imagine when times are really scarce they're all willing to agree to having that allowance cut off (probably even Jayne), if it means keeping Serenity fueled and supplied.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 5:28 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:

Like what?




Well, for example, the whole rite-of-passage-by-sex thing and "union" thing in Jaynestown calls pretty strongly to a new-age revisioning of Hieros Gamos.

Quote:

Seems like too radical and unnecessary a shift for me, to artificially create all spiritual reference for the sake of "PR" out of nowhere and invent a philosophy to teach all new students, who would if course all be too naive to ever question where it came from upon examining Guild history. That would also imply all member of that union were happy to be frauds, which is a pretty harsh accusation.


Over a good century? Because that's how long the voyage took to the new system. Assuming, that is, that the companion Guild didn't have their roots further back on earth. And, of course, the verse has been around and terraformed for at least a century as well. That's not fast or radical. We're talking between four and eight generations, maybe more, of boys and girls raised hearing the same thing over and over.

It doesn't even have to be that it was the entire Guild at first, but rather that business savvy leaders of the Guild at the time invented some kind of cult to attract members. It would still technically be more of a PR campaign if the intention was to make it acceptable for the mass public.

Quote:

I guess if this is going to go down a "the Guild MUST be bad because it is a large organisation" road then we should agree to disagree now.


No, but the Guild was, first and foremost, organized for the sake of a business enterprise. Otherwise why not call it the Church Of The Most High Goddess or something?

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/02/us/religion-based-on-sex-gets-a-judi
cial-review.html?pagewanted=1

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 6:14 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:

Like what?




Well, for example, the whole rite-of-passage-by-sex thing and "union" thing in Jaynestown calls pretty strongly to a new-age revisioning of Hieros Gamos.



But sex has been considered a rite of passage into adulthood far beyond "new age" and it's really more the philosophy of Magistrate Higgins than it is Inara's. She adamently points out that it has nothing to do with getting closer to adulthood, in fact.

And sex is a form of union. Why is that necessarily "hokey" and fake?

Quote:


It doesn't even have to be that it was the entire Guild at first, but rather that business savvy leaders of the Guild at the time invented some kind of cult to attract members. It would still technically be more of a PR campaign if the intention was to make it acceptable for the mass public.



But why would a spiritual bend (as a shift away from what was already offered) make it more acceptable, if they already had a satisfied customer base? If anything, it might alienate previous customers.

And a super-gradual change over centuries would hardly be a desired result of a deliberate campaign designed to increase acceptance. The pay-off would be decades/centuries away and the outcome uncertain. Unless you - again - imply that intermediate generations were happy to participate in phony spirituality.

I don't get this angle at all. It's a lot less likely than a genuine development of culture. After all, even if you dismiss it all as "hokey new ageism", there are still people who feel at home in that world view, which makes it no less real or genuine than, say, Catholicism.

Quote:


Quote:

I guess if this is going to go down a "the Guild MUST be bad because it is a large organisation" road then we should agree to disagree now.


No, but the Guild was, first and foremost, organized for the sake of a business enterprise. Otherwise why not call it the Church Of The Most High Goddess or something?



Because they are not a religious order? They are a union, a Guild. They protect an existing trade. They don't suddenly (someone had to suddenly have the idea, after all, no matter how gradual a change you suggest) change the trade for a dubious gain of acceptance.


I do suspect your bias and my bias do work against each other here.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 6:21 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:

He seems to have that same commitment to his crew, judging by his taking River and Simon back in during the movie, and going to rescue Inara, and his very real reaction when Book is shot (both in the series and the movie). He holds himself responsible, maybe too much.



It's more the emotional committment I meant. Mal is fiercely loyal. But even his best friend Zoe calls him "sir".

They say you don't pay a prostitute for sex but to go away afterwards. That's a little how I see Mal dealing with emotional committment to his crew "family". He gets to be fiercely loyal but it's because that's his Duty as The Captain. That way, he gets to push them away rather harshly when it suits him. He doesn't have all the work of real emotional relationships.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 6:37 AM

BYTEMITE


I'm sorry, I'm atheist. Most of the organized spirituality people have come up with seems pretty hokey to me.

Quote:

And sex is a form of union. Why is that necessarily "hokey" and fake?


Because my guess would be considering Sihnon's considerable Chinese influence, most members of the Guild are of the Hànchuán Fójiào flavour of Buddhism, not the rare sect of Indian Vajrayana Buddhism that believes in sex rites. Inara espousing a philosophy of sex as a sacred union seems to be in direct conflict with what her actual religious beliefs probably are.

Though admittedly that was mostly to get Magistrate Higgins out of the way, so I also admit the possibility that this didn't represent Guild philosophy at all.

Quote:

But why would a spiritual bend (as a shift away from what was already offered) make it more acceptable, if they already had a satisfied customer base? If anything, it might alienate previous customers.


Maybe, but if they were accepted by the mainstream, they'd get more customers to replace the ones they'd lost, and if previous costumers saw that the offered services hadn't changed, they might win them back.


Quote:

And a super-gradual change over centuries would hardly be a desired result of a deliberate campaign designed to increase acceptance. The pay-off would be decades/centuries away and the outcome uncertain. Unless you - again - imply that intermediate generations were happy to participate in phony spirituality.


...Not really. How else does a cult form? Usually the leader just wants to make a crap ton of money, but the followers for some reason believe it all whole heartedly.

Quote:

Because they are not a religious order? They are a union, a Guild. They protect an existing trade.


So we agree here. I suspect our differences might lie in whether we believe a business can actually have a spiritual side. The Guild started as a business. It seems to have become something more. Still, the spiritual side of the Guild seems fairly inexplicable unless you consider the spiritualism must have all been developed early on for business reasons.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 6:49 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:

He seems to have that same commitment to his crew, judging by his taking River and Simon back in during the movie, and going to rescue Inara, and his very real reaction when Book is shot (both in the series and the movie). He holds himself responsible, maybe too much.



It's more the emotional committment I meant. Mal is fiercely loyal. But even his best friend Zoe calls him "sir".

They say you don't pay a prostitute for sex but to go away afterwards. That's a little how I see Mal dealing with emotional committment to his crew "family". He gets to be fiercely loyal but it's because that's his Duty as The Captain. That way, he gets to push them away rather harshly when it suits him. He doesn't have all the work of real emotional relationships.



Hmm. In some ways I agree with this... But I don't think he's fiercely loyal just because he sees himself as obligated by duty.

I'm also failing to remember specific instances of him pushing the crew emotionally away. He definitely pushes Inara away... I don't know. I know he can be snarky and mean, but he has more of an avoidant approach to close relationships. When he's actually in a "leave me alone" mood, he more tends to just walk away rather than push away. His response usually is "I can't (won't) deal with this."

For some reason it doesn't seem accurate to me to say the wages are a "you have to put up with me" insurance on Mal's part.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:20 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

But sex has been considered a rite of passage into adulthood far beyond "new age"


See, that's another thing. Sacred Union and Hieros Gamos have absolutely nothing to do with sex-as-rite-of-passage.

That Inara even brings it up there is WEIRD, and indicates that her understanding of the history and philosophy behind all of that is incomplete. As I said, it's more in line with the amalgamation of ideas that is new-age-ism.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:22 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
I'm sorry, I'm atheist. Most of the organized spirituality people have come up with seems pretty hokey to me.



I'm an agnostic, but I respect the religious or spiritual experience of other people. Not necessarily organised religious institutions, but I do not consider their members or leaders fake per se.

Quote:


Quote:

And sex is a form of union. Why is that necessarily "hokey" and fake?


Because my guess would be considering Sihnon's considerable Chinese influence, most members of the Guild are of the Hànchuán Fójiào flavour of Buddhism, not the rare sect of Indian Vajrayana Buddhism that believes in sex rites. Inara espousing a philosophy of sex as a sacred union seems to be in direct conflict with what her actual religious beliefs probably are.



That's a pretty specific assumption, though, which discounts the possible shift and fusion of religious believe and practice in a space of 500 years.

Quote:



Though admittedly that was mostly to get Magistrate Higgins out of her face, so I also admit the possibility that this didn't represent Guild philosophy at all.



I agree with this.

I also think I may have wrongly given the impression that I think the actual service provided is necessaily spiritual. It can be, but the only suggestion of it is in "Jaynestown" and even there we both agree it's speculative whether it applies at all. What I see as spiritual is mostly Guild-internal and cultural, for the Companions themselves rather than as part of the "product".

That's why PR doesn't want to mesh with the concept in my eyes.

Quote:


Quote:

But why would a spiritual bend (as a shift away from what was already offered) make it more acceptable, if they already had a satisfied customer base? If anything, it might alienate previous customers.


Maybe, but if they were accepted by the mainstream, they'd get more customers to replace the ones they'd lost, and if previous costumers saw that the offered services hadn't changed, they might win them back.



This assuming that profit is the only motivating factor. Since these women already chose a rather specific profession one would assume out of personal inclination, why would they agree to changing it by adding something they do not feel? Your theory places profit far over the "integrity" if you will, of the unionized professionals in question. It's one thing to offer a service of agreed illusion, another to pretend religious feelings.

Quote:


...Not really. How else does a cult form? Usually the leader just wants to make a crap ton of money, but the followers for some reason believe it all whole heartedly.



So now they're a brainwashed cult?

I already did state how I feel about the presumed "evil Guild", so we really don't need to go further on this if that's your starting point. :(


Quote:


Quote:

Because they are not a religious order? They are a union, a Guild. They protect an existing trade.


So we agree here. I suspect our differences might lie in whether we believe a business can actually have a spiritual side. The Guild started as a business. It seems to have become something more. Still, the spiritual side of the Guild seems fairly inexplicable unless you consider the spiritualism must have all been developed early on for business reasons.



I don't see it as mainly a business. I see it as a union for business women, but a union with a spiritual bend that grew out of a genuine spirituality. I don't see Coca Cola or whatever it is you see and I certainly don't see Inara or most other Companions as brainwashed zombies too naive to realize if something is deeply fake.

So... really, as I suspected, we're not going to see eye to eye on this.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:22 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Quote:

But sex has been considered a rite of passage into adulthood far beyond "new age"


See, that's another thing. Sacred Union and Hieros Gamos have absolutely nothing to do with sex-as-rite-of-passage.

That Inara even brings it up there is WEIRD, and indicates that her understanding of the history and philosophy behind all of that is incomplete. As I said, it's more in line with the amalgamation of ideas that is new-age-ism.



She brings it up to negate it, not to affirm it. So this does - again - not apply.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:37 AM

BYTEMITE


Why is a cult considered automatically evil? They aren't.

Quote:

That's a pretty specific assumption, though, which discounts the possible shift and fusion of religious believe and practice in a space of 500 years.


From the Vajrayana? o.0 I find that extremely unlikely, unless the Guild took all of this from new-age tantricism... Which arguably is neither Buddhist or Vajrayana.

Quote:

I don't see it as mainly a business. I see it as a union for business women, but a union with a spiritual bend that grew out of a genuine spirituality.


Yeah, you're right, we don't see eye to eye. I just don't see how that's possible. For me the only thing that makes sense is either that the Guild started as a business and had a spectacular PR campaign that evolved into an actual culture and spiritualism, or the Guild was started by someone who wanted to mainstream prostitution/protect prostitutes and created a cult to do so. Neither of which are evil goals, I note.

I'm also not sure how the Guild can have such a pervasive spiritual bend, when it's not necessarily part of the package that companions offer.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:43 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:

Hmm. In some ways I agree with this... But I don't think he's fiercely loyal just because he sees himself as obligated by duty.



You misunderstand me. He does not feel obligated out of a sense of duty. "Duty" as coded in "my crew" and being the Captain are his official reasons for all of his actions, whether they have a business motivation or an emotional one. An excuse, if you will. He can go as far as he wants in saving or aiding someone and it can still be "excused" as captainly loyalty, a form of principle and integrity as opposed to an emotional attachment to an individual person, which might lead to demands of emotional access.

Quote:


For some reason it doesn't seem accurate to me to say the wages are a "you have to put up with me" insurance on Mal's part.



But try being snarky and mean consistently the way Mal can be and keep those friends around. Friends, rightfully, demand a certain base level of emotional access as well as decent treatment. Neither of which Mal is consistently willing to provide. The business relationship creates a connection beyond personal attachment, a neutral ground for retreat.

Zoe's "sir" and the way we do NOT see them ever discuss emotional matters is deeply symptomatic of this. Mal has "officially" no close friends. He has subordinates and business relationships, passengers and.. Monty? Friendship is only ever implied, never openly aknowledged and in tense moments utterly dismissed.

That's a serious lack of emotional committment.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:47 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

She brings it up to negate it, not to affirm it. So this does - again - not apply.


Okay, so perhaps this isn't something Inara believes. But does Inara hold new-age beliefs?

What do you make of the time when Inara tells Kaylee she selects clients based on their "energy"? That's pretty new-age.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:52 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Why is a cult considered automatically evil? They aren't.



Well, you framed it in a context of greed and naivety, so.. yeah.

Quote:


Quote:

That's a pretty specific assumption, though, which discounts the possible shift and fusion of religious believe and practice in a space of 500 years.


From the Vajrayana? o.0 I find that extremely unlikely, unless the Guild took all of this from new-age tantricism... Which arguably is neither Buddhist or Vajrayana.



Honestly, I barely know what those are nor do I really think it's relevant. What I mean is that 500 years down the line in cultural fusion a whole lot of spiritual believes can develop that are not static copies of current geographically assigned faiths, nor would they be "hokey" or fake or artificial. All religions were new once and developed from other sources. That doesn't make their followers cult victims or phonies.

Quote:


Quote:

I don't see it as mainly a business. I see it as a union for business women, but a union with a spiritual bend that grew out of a genuine spirituality.


Yeah, you're right, we don't see eye to eye. I just don't see how that's possible. For me the only thing that makes sense is either that the Guild started as a business and had a spectacular PR campaign that evolved into an actual culture and spiritualism, or the Guild was started by someone who wanted to mainstream prostitution/protect prostitutes and created a cult to do so. Neither of which are evil goals, I note.



The implication of fake spirituality is certainly far from virtuous or even neutral. And so is the (as you stated) profit-oriented nature of cults, so the implication if not "evil" is certainly derrogatory.

Quote:


I'm also not sure how the Guild can have such a pervasive spiritual bend, when it's not necessarily part of the package that companions offer.



I see it as part of the package that the Guild offers Companions. Their own practice of it bleeds into their business, but mostly I think it would serve as a spiritual focus for women in a profession than can be isolating and emotionally taxing.

Let's agree to disagree. Again.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:53 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

But try being snarky and mean consistently the way Mal can be and keep those friends around.


Yet his crew comes to save him from Niska, in spite of his treatment of him. If this concept exists for Mal, it must be largely delusion.

I wonder if once he was feeling better after Niska he started being exceptionally mean to his crew, to reestablish the status quo in his mind. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:59 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Quote:

But try being snarky and mean consistently the way Mal can be and keep those friends around.


Yet his crew comes to save him from Niska, in spite of his treatment of him. If this concept exists for Mal, it must be largely delusion.

I wonder if once he was feeling better after Niska he started being exceptionally mean to his crew, to reestablish the status quo in his mind. :)




Lots of people will say some amazingly snarky and mean things to their closest friends - things that would get you punched right in the face if you dared say them to a stranger or mere acquaintance. Mal's crew knows about him what he knows about them: for all the snarkiness and ass-hattery, when the chips are down and one of them needs the others, they're going to be there, no matter what. Everything else is just fun and games in comparison.


The modern definition of "socialist" is anyone who's winning an argument against a tea-bagger.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, September 24, 2010
I hate Obama's America. You're damn right about that.


Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:59 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Well, you framed it in a context of greed and naivety, so.. yeah.


Quote:

nor would they be "hokey" or fake or artificial. All religions were new once and developed from other sources. That doesn't make their followers cult victims or phonies.


>_>

<_<

Well... I was trying not to say it. But that kind of is how I see religion. Just people in power trying to make money.

The religion itself and the followers aren't evil, and neither necessarily are the leaders evil. It's a business like any other, but it's in the business of selling hope and salvation to people.

Pretty neutral, from my POV.

Quote:

Let's agree to disagree. Again.


Probably a good idea, since I'm pretty sure I'm about to get wrecked by other people having to admit my true thoughts about religion.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 8:06 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Quote:

She brings it up to negate it, not to affirm it. So this does - again - not apply.


Okay, so perhaps this isn't something Inara believes. But does Inara hold new-age beliefs?

What do you make of the time when Inara tells Kaylee she selects clients based on their "energy"? That's pretty new-age.



"But physical appearance doesn't matter so terribly. You look for a compatibility of spirit. There's an energy about a person that's difficult to hide, you try to feel that--"


I honestly think she was trying to describe "I use my intuition" in a more visual frame. 'Energy' certainly creates the image of a personality and demeaner based impression. I doubt Inara would walk up to a person and espouse about their "energy". More a form of gut instinct. "Compatibility of spirit" is flowery but it's a solid enough thing to say in description. Inara is emotionally involved in her profession, she won't describe it in clinical terms.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 8:18 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:


"But physical appearance doesn't matter so terribly. You look for a compatibility of spirit. There's an energy about a person that's difficult to hide, you try to feel that--"


I honestly think she was trying to describe "I use my intuition" in a more visual frame. 'Energy' certainly creates the image of a personality and demeaner based impression. I doubt Inara would walk up to a person and espouse about their "energy". More a form of gut instinct. "Compatibility of spirit" is flowery but it's a solid enough thing to say in description. Inara is emotionally involved in her profession, she won't describe it in clinical terms.



Hmm, makes sense. She also talks about chi energy in Better Days, but Chinese Massage actually was probably something she was trained in.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 8:22 AM

AGENTROUKA


(Edited to add disclaimer: I am a self-righteous jerk. Please refer to apology in my next post.)

In closing, so to speak:

I used "spiritual" on purpose because I did not want to use "religious" with all its abusive connotations.

I think for many people the term, though perhaps fuzzy, describes more an internal than an external experience. If it's not tied to doctrine, especially, it can just be a metaphorical construct for a complex understanding of the world, sometimes coupled with rituals as a deliberate form of self-manipulation.

Marking birthdays is a ritual that makes aging concrete. A similar ritual can be a symbolic sacrifice to an embodiment of a particular area of life, in order to create emotional outlets or a reminder of philosophical insight. Prayer can be a form of meditation.

Unless made rigid, literal and connected to political motives, spirituality or its expression in religion is, indeed, neutral.

I'm not fan of how religion is or has been used in many cases, but I don't consider the arrogance with which the experience of spirituality is dismissed to be a sign of enlightenment but rather of an unwillingness to understand, a lack of curiosity and closedness no better than any other doctrine.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 8:36 AM

BYTEMITE


EDIT: editted for snark.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 8:40 AM

AGENTROUKA


Aww crap.

I apologize for my self-righeous tone and the way it seems to imply those things about you to the exclusion of everything else.

I do not think that about you, at least not mostly. I think you do dismiss some things and that it contradicts the open-minded way you approach other things, but the aggressive tone of my post is completely unwarranted and I'm ashamed of making you feel attacked by it.

It was not my intention to sound so harsh. I'm sorry.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 8:45 AM

BYTEMITE


Nerg. You... Shouldn't apologize. I've sounded like an ass and I know it, which is why I've been trying to avoid speaking so plainly. But I can't change my general sense of mistrust and paranoia.

People can practice religion, and I don't think they're naive, at all. I think they're just trying to find comfort in a world that offers very, very little. In many ways, that's probably smarter than I am, trying to cope with everything on my own.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 10:37 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

All religions were new once and developed from other sources. That doesn't make their followers cult victims or phonies.


It doesn't?

How about "deluded"? Can we at least agree that they're deluded?


The modern definition of "socialist" is anyone who's winning an argument against a tea-bagger.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, September 24, 2010
I hate Obama's America. You're damn right about that.


Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 5, 2010 11:07 AM

AGENTROUKA


Nope.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL