The Thread of Court Cases Trump Is Winning
POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Thursday, September 3, 2026 03:01
VIEWED: 5913
PAGE 1 of 2
If there is another one, I don't see it.
Please refer to other one(s).
Obviously, most cases are obstructed by Libtard Judges and prevented from being heard, which Libtards count as a "win" for Team Libtard.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.u
scourts.flsd.648652.100.0_1.pdf
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
CASE NO. 23-80101-CR-CANNON
UNITED STATES,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DONALD J. TRUMP,
WALTINE NAUTA, and
CARLOS DE OLIVEIRA,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
ORDER STRIKING SEALED FILINGS AND ORDERING BRIEFING
THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Special Counsel’s Motion for a Garcia
Hearing [ECF No. 97] and related filings [ECF Nos. 95, 96 (Sealed)]. It is ORDERED AND
ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Special Counsel moves [ECF No. 97] for a Garcia hearing to inquire into
“potential conflicts of interests that may arise from attorney Stanley Woodward, Jr.’s
prior and current representation of three individuals the Government may call to testify
at the trial of his client Waltine Nauta” [ECF No. 97 p. 1]. Simultaneously, the Special
Counsel moves for leave [ECF No. 95] to file under seal a “Supplement” containing
additional information “to facilitate the Court’s inquiry” [ECF No. 96; see ECF No. 97
p. 2 n.2, p. 6]. The Special Counsel states in conclusory terms that the supplement
should be sealed from public view “to comport with grand jury secrecy,” but the motion
Case 9:23-cr-80101-AMC Document 100 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 23-80101-CR-CANNON
2
for leave and the supplement plainly fail to satisfy the burden of establishing a
sufficient legal or factual basis to warrant sealing the motion and supplement.
2. The Special Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal [ECF No. 95] is DENIED.
3. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the docket sealed entries 95 and 96.
4. Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97]
on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the
response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury
proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on
matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district. The Special Counsel
shall respond to that discussion in a Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 97], due
on or before August 22, 2023. The remaining Defendants may, but are not required
to, file briefs of their own related to the grand jury issue referenced herein, but any such
briefs are due by August 17, 2023, and may be submitted in combined or individual
fashion.1
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Fort Pierce, Florida, this 7th day of August 2023.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/judge-aileen-cannon-comes-swinging-170207097
.html
Today's Fake news is largely ignoring this, to concentrate on the Hunter Biden Cover-Up . . . errrrr, assignment of SP to delay until after all Statutes of Limitations have run out. (Hey, is this the very first time, ever, that a Federal Administration Employee has ASKED to be named Special Prosecutor, and then awarded the gig?)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
its a joke a clownshow now
Sometime ago the court system became the Mob system, they would kill with Bureaucracy and Lawsuits rather than bullets
the Neo-Cons, the weirdo Masonic clubs, perverted Globalist Jews, the Saudis, the elite Euro Royals invaded and fucked up the US Legal system
Micro Bush fucked up the US Courts so it was long ago being destroyed before Bolsevik 'Libtard' truly got near it...the system has been dying for decades but the Neo-Left might be the final nail in the coffin
IT could go full Wakanda before it dies
an actual imbecile is put into the US Supreme Court, she defends islamist terrorists and she can not tell the difference between a man or woman
she is pro-pedophile
but Globalist media says you must celebrate because she is Black and Female
the Anti-American Low IQ retard Ketanji Brown Jackson
enjoy the show
but....
There are a lot of cases I'm not sure how many he will win
It seems like he will have lost more than he has won
- He said she said Liable or Defamation, one or two cases it could go either way?
counter Defamation Lawsuits,
Trump vs CNN 'Fake News'
the news agency CNN calls Trump Hitler so Trump sued CNN in the Southern District of Florida, alleging that "CNN has sought to use its massive influence—purportedly as a 'trusted' news source—to defame the Plaintiff in the minds of its viewers
https://thehill.com/media/4126560-judge-dismisses-trumps-defamation-la
wsuit-against-cnn/
,
https://ca.style.yahoo.com/style/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-big-203
137986.html
Insurrection or as some call it here 'The Coup'
maybe at least 10 Lawsuits
also counter Lawsuits one Trump lawsuit claimed that the House committee was illegitimate and that its request for the records was a partisan sham. The Supreme Court denied Trump's request without providing a reason. The next day, the National Archives and Records Administration released the White House documents to the committee.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jan/19/us-capitol-riot-trump-
documents-national-archives
Money Financial
perhaps 6 Cases going to court, the nu-Left going crazy that he would reduce the amount of taxes he and his company paid, cases about financial and tax information
34 felony counts of falsifying business records, in Florida, the Justice Department brought 37 counts against him
Asking about Votes or Election interference
at least 2 cases
did he pick up a phone,
Georgia case is a criminal investigation.
Wayne County, Detroit, Michigan suing Trump and the Republican National Committee for threatening to overturn the election results, a political show for BLM Antifa or NAACP? National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
Grab Em By the Pussy words or Sexual misconduct
another 1 or 2 coming?
E Jean Carroll it was rape but not rape he used nasty words
Judge said GUILTY
Lawsuits by state
Wisconsin, Michigan, Hawaii, SHITHOLE Commiefornia, Arizona, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia...more phone calls, Securing Ballots Cast
Other
Ex-Lawyers stabbing him in the back Lawsuits for breach of contract,
he sues them back?
BigTech vs Trump
They already kicked his ass, then you have WeChat Users v. Trump, Facebook vs Trump, Trump vs Facebook counter lawsuits, Utubes vs Trump...Trump will of course be more worried about Tiktok or some shit or his blog that nobody reads.
People and groups vs Trump Executive orders
Trump bans terrorists, the jihad lawyers and Leftwing loons sue to get his orders overturned call him 'racist' or some nonsense, they want 'The Wall' gone, they alledge crime or investigate payments into the Wall, Sanctury Cities vs Trump,
San Fran-SHIT-SICKO v. Trump
Hawaii v. Trump
it is now bruned to the ground but Hawaii is more worried about Violation of the Amendment Establishment Clause claiming the travel ban targeted Radical islamist Jihadi Terrorists...adn that is suppo
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Possibly HUNDREDS of cases coming
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/threads/fl-former-president-donald-t
rump-indicted-40-counts-classified-documents-and-obstruction-of-justice-june-2023-trial-may-2024-2.686530/page-2
You think he would win 50% or 60% of them?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So let's imagine he wins a little more than half
From that other thread
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Here is a list of crimes Donald Trump has been credibly accused of since first running for office: This does not include his last indictment nor the Georgia indictment yet to come.
1) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30109, 30116, 30118; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Causing (or accepting) an individual contribution in excess of the lawful limit (2015)
2) 18 U.S.C. § 371 Conspiring to commit campaign finance offenses and/or defraud the enforcement of campaign finance laws (2015-2017)
3) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30104, 30109; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Causing a campaign committee to fail to report an unlawful corporate contribution (2016 - AMI)
4) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30104, 30109; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Causing a campaign committee to fail to report an unlawful corporate contribution (2016 - Cohen)
5) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30109, 30116, 30118; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Causing (or accepting) an individual campaign contribution in excess of statutory limits (2016)
6) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30109, 30118; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Causing (or accepting) an unlawful corporate campaign contribution (2016)
7) 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1519 Causing a campaign committee to fail to report an unlawful corporate contribution (2016-2017)
8) 18 U.S.C. § 1001 Knowingly omitting or failing to disclose a material fact (2017)
9) 5 U.S.C. app. § 104(a)(1)-(2) Knowingly and willfully failing to report required information (2017)
10) 18 U.S.C. § 1001; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Obstruction of justice and witness tampering (2017)
11) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(b); 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice and witness tampering (2017)
12) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - Flynn)
13) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - firing Comey)
14) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - Mueller)
15) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - attempted influencing Comey)
16) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - attempted firing Mueller)
17) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - 2018 - Sessions)
18) 18 U.S.C. § 1001 False statement (2017 - 2019)
19) 5 U.S.C. app. § 102(a)(3)) Criminal violation of the Ethics in Government Act (2017 - 2019)
20) 18 U.S.C. § 1361 Willful destruction of government property (2017 - 2021)
21) 18 U.S.C. § 2071 Willful destruction of government records (2017 - 2021)
22) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(b); 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice and witness tampering (2018 - Manafort)
23) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2018 - McGahn)
24) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2018 - Manafort jury)
25) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(b); 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice and witness tampering (2018 - 2019 - Cohen)
26) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(b); 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice and witness tampering (2018 - 2019 - Stone)
27) 18 U.S.C. § 201 Bribery (2019)
28) 18 U.S.C. § 610 Coercion of political activity (2019)
29) 18 U.S.C. § 641 Misappropriation of federal funds (2019)
30) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1505, 1512 Obstruction of Justice (2019 -Ukraine)
31) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30109, 30121 Soliciting unlawful foreign campaign contributions (2019)
32) 18 U.S.C. § 595 Criminal violation of the Hatch Act (2020)
33) 8 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy against rights (2020 - 2021)
34) 52 U.S.C. § 20511(2)(B) Depriving state residents a fair and impartial election process (2020 - 2021)
35) Ga. Code Ann. § 16-10-20 Knowingly making a false statement (2020 - 2021)
36) Ga. Code Ann. § 16-10-93 Influencing government officials to withhold or alter a record (2020 - 2021)
37) GaCodeAnn.§16-4-7 (solici
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
None of that means anything or matters.
All that list is showing is the desperation of a Democrat party that is terrified of losing.
They very well should be since not only Republicans but Trump himself have embraced the mail-in fraud ballot system that Democrats instituted during Covid to get Trump out of office and will have destroyed the American system of voting for the rest of the life of the country.
Be well prepared to see CNN, MSNBC and all the Lefty news websites that copy whatever CNN and MSNBC say all telling you how evil Republicans cheated by ballot harvesting and using mail in fraud ballots to win the 2024 elections as if they weren't the party that started all of this in the first place. And then watch Ted and Second complaining about it to, as if this is some new thing that only started happening next year because it was perfectly fine when they got their way but it's cheating after they lost.
And I'm going to agree with them. It IS cheating. It IS illegitimate.
But it's what their party did to the country and for the rest of our lives nobody is going to have any faith in the voting process and will have very valid reasons for claiming that the results of any election going forward are illegitimate.
I do hope that somebody will put the shit back in the horse, but there's a reason why the tale of Sauron's ring resonates so deeply with so many people. I have little faith that the damage done leading up to the 2020 election will ever be fixed by either party.
--------------------------------------------------
How you do anything is how you do everything.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:
So let's imagine he wins a little more than half
From that other thread
Half?
Libtards are only hoping for ONE!
They are so desperate to get ONE conviction, that they are throwing thousands of Fake Charges like feces against the wall, hoping that SOMETHING will stick. They are barely equivalent to untrained monkeys.
They are hoping that illiterate clowns who cannot pay attention will see their thousands of Fake Claims as somehow legitimate.
Congratulations, you won their prize.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
We are seeing courtroom victories, legislative leadership, investigation breakthroughs, partnership opportunities, and best of all, a steady rise in the number of faithful Americans who recognize our country is in peril and are speaking out and stepping up in new ways, translating their passions into actions, all for the good of the Republic. It’s exciting!
The last few years have been extremely difficult - and we all know the difficulties are far from over. But, there is no battle that cannot be won if Americans stand together. I’ll restrain myself from launching a full-on pep rally, but we have a lot to be positive about:
Arizona Superior Court in Yavapai County found that the state’s process for signature matching on mail-in ballots was unlawful. A Georgia Federal Court affirmed protections against ballot harvesting and dropbox abuse. And in Florida Federal Court, a suit that attempted to prevent President Trump from running for reelection was dismissed.
Common-sense legislative reforms are happening all over the country. To give you a sense of the scale of battle, check out this tracker from Voting Rights Lab, currently following 1,894 election related bills. (Note: Voting Rights Lab is not a fan of ours, nor do we share their views, but I thought you would find their spreadsheet approach insightful).
Researchers are making strides in uncovering ballot trafficking, machine manipulation, election finance abuse, noncitizen registration, and more. Evidence-backed announcements from Kari Lake’s team and Gateway Pundit are testaments to the value of perseverance - and there’s more to come! We are privileged to work with so many great teams, providing research, tech, and legal support when needed.
Last week I wrote about our three non-negotiable goals for 2024:
Election processes must follow the law.
Voter rolls must be accurate.
Citizens, sheriffs, and legislators must be equipped to participate.
While we continue to make great headway, last week we advanced exponentially; new tech, new collaborations, new opportunities - all good!
And finally, we are thrilled to see the growing numbers of people who recognize that America is worth saving; that we are not going to stand by silently and let WEF, WHO, and Marxist politicos define our future; and that engaging in elections, by voting, by serving, will unite us in ways we’ve never experienced, for the good.
Hard times are still ahead. We will continue to take massive incoming. But we are over the target. And God’s people are awake and increasingly, rightfully, unafraid.
Keep the faith. Never quit.
Ever onward-
PS - I’ll be back online tonight (Monday, 9/11 @ 7p et). Click here to join in!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/judge-issues-interim-stay-york-223000554.htm
l
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/judge-aileen-cannon-hands-trump-175149183.ht
ml
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And also this:
Quote:
October 06, 2023 | Read Online
Logo
Ineligibles and The Aftermath
Several weeks ago, True the Vote published a short paper titled The Aftermath. Written as part of a broader collection of our recent work in Georgia, The Aftermath addressed the impact Georgia’s dirty voter rolls had on the 2020 election and a meeting I had in 2020 with Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and his team, where we discussed True the Vote’s plans to assist Georgia citizens in challenging ineligible voter records.
The Lawsuit
Our efforts were immediately met with a lawsuit filed against us by attorney Marc Elias on behalf of Stacey Abrams’ organization Fair Fight. The DOJ has now joined with Fair Fight against us. This case has been ongoing since December 2020. Our federal court trial begins in Georgia on October 26th, 2023.
The Indictments
Now, nineteen people, including Donald Trump, have been indicted by Fulton County D. A. Fani Willis. She’s charged them with multiple felony counts over their involvement in the 2020 election, each related explicitly to whether there were known, potentially outcome-determinative inaccuracies in Georgia’s election that were being covered up.
The Truth
Seeing this, I decided to take what I’d written in The Aftermath and turn it into an affidavit. A notarized copy is attached here for use in any way that may be helpful. Here’s an excerpt:
“... I left the meeting unsettled by the seeming indifference the Raffensperger team had shown about their knowledge that the voter rolls had been so markedly inaccurate during the November election. At that time we did not yet have a copy of the state’s published record of voters in the General Election, but because the state uses services like ERIC, which also uses NCOA to identify ineligible records, the Secretary of State’s office knew, or should have known, there were hundreds of thousands of potentially ineligible voters casting votes, hence Raffensperger’s admonition that “The G.O.P should have been doing this all along.”
8. Little more than two weeks later, on January 2nd, 2021, Secretary Raffensperger and members of his staff had a call with President Trump and members of his team. On that call, President Trump asked about inaccurate voter records. Both Secretary Raffensperger and General Counsel Ryan Germany stated that they had fully evaluated the various claims of election irregularities and said without qualification there was no evidence to support them, including no problems with the voting records. This statement was knowingly false. Both men were well-aware of that falsity at the time.
9. True the Vote has completed a review of the voting patterns relating to those 364,541 records identified as ineligible based on permanent change of residency.
10. In Georgia’s November 2020 elections, approximately 67,284 votes were cast that should likely not have been counted because the voters’ registrations were ineligible based on permanent change of residency.
a. Out of County. 48,207 of those votes corresponded to voters who had moved to a different county within Georgia.
b. Out of State. 19,077 of those votes corresponded to voters who no longer lived in Georgia.
11. While we cannot know who voted for which candidate in those ballots that should not have been counted, we do know that the two presidential candidates were separated by only 11,779 votes. It is of great concern that the number of votes for which the address verification requirement was essentially waived in the 2020 General Election could well have been outcome-determinative.”
Aftermath of The Aftermath
This week, Secretary Raffensperger announced efforts to evaluate, inactivate, or remove the voter registration records of 679,749 ineligible voter records.
While we applaud what appear to be efforts to ensure only eligible voters vote in 2024, there were no such efforts in 2020. According to available state and federal data, over 300,000 ineligible records were on the rolls, and over 67,000
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/judge-overseeing-georgia-election-interferen
ce-141833863.html
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The day Trump's bond was reduced by about $300 million, his Truth Social went public, and he acquired over $3 Billion in cash position - the wealthiest he has been in his life. 2 days later, it was $5 Billion.
The Stock marker is DJT.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
The day Trump's bond was reduced by about $300 million, his Truth Social went public, and he acquired over $3 Billion in cash position - the wealthiest he has been in his life. 2 days later, it was $5 Billion.
The Stock marker is DJT.
Well... you've got to tell the whole story as it is when you report it...
Especially when it's so easy to look up even if you didn't offer up the stock marker.
It peaked at $62.22 on March 27th. Since then, as of closing several hours after you made this post today, it is sitting at $40.59 and has lost nearly 20% of its value per share in that time. At open yesterday morning before you made the post, it was $44.86% and lost nearly 6% in one day alone after losing quite a bit of value 3 of the previous 4 days.
Currently, it's sitting at a couple bucks lower than it did on March 20th and 21st. Back in late January it was worth $10 more per share than it is today.
Not trying to crap on your parade or anything, but you should probably either vet your own news sources when somebody makes claims, or if you're actually presenting false and/or old information that is now longer true as currently true, you probably shouldn't do it with something that is blatantly and easily verifiable as not true.
I hope Trump does well with the Truth Social thing, but I haven't brought it up a single time in here yet because I'm the last person who is going to pretend to understand how social media platforms that don't actually make any money have market caps like they do. Maybe people are so heavily invested in them as a form of gambling that one day one of them will finally figure out how to successfully market their platforms in a tangible way where they actually make quarterly profits that aren't built entirely on speculation.
This whole thing to me is not to dissimilar to the NFT scams and what I believe will one day be the largest I Told You So moment of my life when Bitcoin goes bust and the entire crypto market vaporizes.
Twitter has never made anybody any money outside of its trading in the stock market. So if they haven't figured out how to do this in all of that time, I have no idea how anybody believes that Truth Social will crack that code.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Truth Social is more of Trump Casino. Both were solely about making Trump rich and not designed to make investors rich, other than to temporarily give investors good feelings so that they will invest with Trump.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Twitter has never made anybody any money outside of its trading in the stock market. So if they haven't figured out how to do this in all of that time, I have no idea how anybody believes that Truth Social will crack that code.
The last time a Trump company went public it didn't go well for investors
Trump made millions in the 1990s when his casino company went public. Investors lost a fortune.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/last-time-trump-company-
went-public-didnt-go-well-investors-rcna144657
Will Truth Social face the same fate as Trump's casinos? (It will.)
CNN's Brianna Keilar breaks down the parallels between the financial struggles former President Donald Trump faced with his casino empire and his present day troubles with Truth Social.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2024/04/04/truth-social-trump-casi
nos-sot-src-vpx.cnn
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Truth Social is more of Trump Casino. Both were solely about making Trump rich and not designed to make investors rich, other than to temporarily give investors good feelings so that they will invest with Trump.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Twitter has never made anybody any money outside of its trading in the stock market. So if they haven't figured out how to do this in all of that time, I have no idea how anybody believes that Truth Social will crack that code.
The last time a Trump company went public it didn't go well for investors
Trump made millions in the 1990s when his casino company went public. Investors lost a fortune.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/last-time-trump-company-
went-public-didnt-go-well-investors-rcna144657
Will Truth Social face the same fate as Trump's casinos? (It will.)
CNN's Brianna Keilar breaks down the parallels between the financial struggles former President Donald Trump faced with his casino empire and his present day troubles with Truth Social.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2024/04/04/truth-social-trump-casi
nos-sot-src-vpx.cnn
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
This has nothing to do with Trump.
Casinos make sense. Investing in casinos makes sense. There is a product/service that is provided that can easily bring in a lot of money if it's handled right.
Twitter and Truth Social, along with Bitcoin and NFTs make absolutely no sense. Outside of pure speculation, they offer no product or service that equates to any actual revenue on the back end.
Even YouTube loses billions of dollars every year for Google and they can't figure out how to plug that leak. The only reason we're able to use YouTube today is because Google has more money than god and can keep funding it year after year at a great loss.
The entire stock market is fucked these days. I think a large part of that was all the free money being tossed around for so long, and the rich people who had money to gamble drove prices all over the place when they shouldn't have moved at all otherwise.
Gamestop is another one. It was worth over $80 at one point. It's now worth $11 today, and that's severely overvalued given the dire straits the company is in. Anybody who owns Gamestop right now should cash out while they can still get a small percentage of their money back. It's never going back up again.
AMC is probably the best example in recent memory. It was worth over $230 a share at one point and now is worth just over $3 per share. AMC has a better chance of going back up a little naturally because the movie theater business is still in a lot better situation than the brick and mortar video game store business, but nobody should expect any insane speculation driven rise to happen again. If they came late to the party and bought at the top, they lost a ton of money on that one.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/10/allen-weisselberg-sent
enced-perjury-trump-fraud-trial
He is 76.
So sure, he plead the case.
He admitted testifying truthfully under oath, and for that - in New York Court, it is called perjury - he will serve some time.
New York corrupt Court, crooked Judge, corrupt AG needed him to lie under oath and say Mar-a-Lago really, really, really was worth only $18 or so, along with all of his other properties, just like the Judge said they were worthless.
But he didn't lie under oath, he never lied about Trump, and so he must pay the price for honestly - being convicted (I think) or at least pleading to perjury.
Yet another win for Trump.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:So sorry that I did not rush right away to the nearest interwebs terminal at the instant the news occurred.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:Well... you've got to tell the whole story as it is when you report it...
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
The day Trump's bond was reduced by about $300 million, his Truth Social went public, and he acquired over $3 Billion in cash position - the wealthiest he has been in his life. 2 days later, it was $5 Billion.
The Stock marker is DJT.
Especially when it's so easy to look up even if you didn't offer up the stock marker.
I made several statements there, all from recall, and without embellishments - that I knew of.
On Sunday, 24 March Trump's bond was set at $464M. On 25 March it was reduced to $175M. This is a reduction of $289M - which can reasonably be interpreted as "about $300M."
Check.
On Friday, 22 March DJT was listed as closing at 36.9400.
It went public on Monday, 25 March, and closed at 49.9500 that day.
On Wednesday, 27 March it closed at 66.2200. It peaked, whether on Wednesday or Thursday, at 79.3800.
Although I don't have the exact details on cash liquidation and conversion, any person reasonable capable of cyphering can see that if somewhere between 36.94 and 49.95 was equivalent to "more than $3 Billion" then either 66.22 or 79.38 was easily equivalent to over $5 Billion - if not both.
Check and check, no matter how you slice it.
All of the facts that I stated seem to be true.
Sorry.
Most of this can be found at marketwatch.com
Quote:Share prices prior to 24 March are fairly useless, because they were not publicly traded until 25 March.
It peaked at $62.22 on March 27th. Since then, as of closing several hours after you made this post today, it is sitting at $40.59 and has lost nearly 20% of its value per share in that time. At open yesterday morning before you made the post, it was $44.86% and lost nearly 6% in one day alone after losing quite a bit of value 3 of the previous 4 days.
Currently, it's sitting at a couple bucks lower than it did on March 20th and 21st. Back in late January it was worth $10 more per share than it is today.
Quote:I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.
Not trying to crap on your parade or anything, but you should probably either vet your own news sources when somebody makes claims, or if you're actually presenting false and/or old information that is now longer true as currently true, you probably shouldn't do it with something that is blatantly and easily verifiable as not true.
I hope Trump does well with the Truth Social thing, but I haven't brought it up a single time in here yet because I'm the last person who is going to pretend to understand how social media platforms that don't actually make any money have market caps like they do. Maybe people are so heavily invested in them as a form of gambling that one day one of them will finally figure out how to successfully market their platforms in a tangible way where they actually make quarterly profits that aren't built entirely on speculation.
This whole thing to me is not to dissimilar to the NFT scams and what I believe will one day be the largest I Told You So moment of my life when Bitcoin goes bust and the entire crypto market vaporizes.
Twitter has never made anybody any money outside of its trading in the stock market. So if they haven't figured out how to do this in all of that time, I have no idea how anybody believes that Truth Social will crack that code.
If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.
Oh really?
Quote:
If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
Knock yourself out. Let us know how it goes.
Right now it's worth $26.55. Just a couple cents more than it was worth on January 19th.
I hope you didn't buy it on day one of the IPO. You're not getting that money back.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SCOTUS questioning on the Immunity Appeal for Jan 6 - why was Bowman not imprisoned for an actual, real violation of this Fake Charge?
Ruling comes out in June or July. It is looking good.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
SCOTUS questioning on the Immunity Appeal for Jan 6 - why was Bowman not imprisoned for an actual, real violation of this Fake Charge?
Ruling comes out in June or July. It is looking good.
Yup.
Trump will be fine. He will also be our next President.

--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Has been really hard to keep up with all of the news of all of the cases Trump is winning.
Yet another Biden Orchestrated and Synchronized Lawfare scam falls flat, won't move before the election.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/judge-delays-donald-trumps-classified-212100
014.html
Of the 4 main Biden Orchestrated and Synchronized Lawfare cases, it looks like all have failed so far. Only the accounting scam in corrupt NYC is doing anything (such as cranking up Trump's poll numbers).
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Has been really hard to keep up with all of the news of all of the cases Trump is winning.
Yet another Biden Orchestrated and Synchronized Lawfare scam falls flat, won't move before the election.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/judge-delays-donald-trumps-classified-212100
014.html
Of the 4 main Biden Orchestrated and Synchronized Lawfare cases, it looks like all have failed so far. Only the accounting scam in corrupt NYC is doing anything (such as cranking up Trump's poll numbers).
Yeah. Posted about that one earlier today in one of Ted's TDS threads...
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You'd better pray that the Porn Star saves you...
Trump classified documents trial suspended indefinitely
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/2995090/trump-classifi
ed-documents-trial-suspended-indefinitely/
That was your only thing coming close to a real case. It ain't happening until after the election, if at all.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
--------------------------------------------------
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Knock yourself out. Let us know how it goes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:Oh really?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.Quote:
If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
Right now it's worth $26.55. Just a couple cents more than it was worth on January 19th.
I hope you didn't buy it on day one of the IPO. You're not getting that money back.
Looks like DJT has been hanging around $50.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Looks like DJT has been hanging around $50.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Knock yourself out. Let us know how it goes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:Oh really?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.Quote:
If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
Right now it's worth $26.55. Just a couple cents more than it was worth on January 19th.
I hope you didn't buy it on day one of the IPO. You're not getting that money back.
Yup. If you had Gamestop in January of 2021 it was worth over $80. If you had AMC it was worth over $230 too. (They're currently worth $15.92 and $3.19, respectively).
I bet anybody who bought a Bored Ape Yacht Club NFT isn't too happy with that purchase right now if they were the ones left holding it when it was clear it was all a meme and they've been hoodwinked.
But by all means, please tell us how Truth Social will make money. Just don't tell that to Elon Musk or he'll steal your trade secrets and finally make Twitter profitable and then Truth Social will never take off.
You know I love Trump man, but I also call a scam a scam. I don't think Trump's responsible for it. I don't think he has anymore clue about Truth Social than Elon does about Twitter.
Honestly, I could see the Left somehow using DJT stock as a way to destroy Trump. All it takes is somebody to do a rug pull and that could come crashing down and ruining a bunch of people while the media would get to claim that Trump himself scammed everyone. Don't matter if that's true or not.
And if that rug pull were instigated one day by Trump himself selling off all of his shares, that would be the end of Trump. So unless he really is the evil person that Ted and Second claim that he is, Trump is pretty much stuck with all of those shares. At least until somebody figures out how to make a site like that legitimately profitable or until the sun burns out.
If Twitter were to fail right now, Elon would be out $44 Billion and he'd be a martyr and an idiot. Plenty of people would be super pissed that they lost their investment, but when Elon's out $44 Billion compared to their relatively tiny losses, they're not going to blame Elon for scamming them. If Trump sells off a ton of DJT stock with a made up value off of speculation and Truth Social crumbles afterward without him, he'd go down as the crook of the century.
I REALLY wish Trump wasn't involved with any of that at all.
--------------------------------------------------
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Looks like DJT has been hanging around $50.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN (on May 8th):Quote:Knock yourself out. Let us know how it goes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:Oh really?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.Quote:
If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
Right now it's worth $26.55. Just a couple cents more than it was worth on January 19th.
I hope you didn't buy it on day one of the IPO. You're not getting that money back.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/djt?mod=mw_quote_switch
Today DJT closed over $53. On the 9th it closed over $54. I thought it bounced up to $58 one of those days.
Yup, quite the loser. $26 to $54.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Looks like DJT has been hanging around $50.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN (on May 8th):Quote:Knock yourself out. Let us know how it goes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:Oh really?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.Quote:
If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
Right now it's worth $26.55. Just a couple cents more than it was worth on January 19th.
I hope you didn't buy it on day one of the IPO. You're not getting that money back.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/djt?mod=mw_quote_switch
Today DJT closed over $53. On the 9th it closed over $54. I thought it bounced up to $58 one of those days.
Yup, quite the loser. $26 to $54.
Sell it now and make a few bucks then.
Or completely disregard the facts in my last post and hold it until it's worthless.
It ain't my money. You do whatever you feel is right.
And I see that there was zero attempt on your part to enlighten us just as to how a company like DJT is actually making money and legitimately propping up the stock price beyond it being just another gambling site for stock speculators.
If you've got a crystal ball, you're bound to make a killing on this one. But you don't want to be one of the losers left holding the bag. Hope you're timing is right and you don't get too greedy.
--------------------------------------------------
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Apparently most analysts are saying the corrupt Kangaroo Court scam will need to rely upon one person to try to tie Trump to some mirage of Accounting Errors - and that is Allen Weisselberg.
Quote:Lettuce sea. They already sent him to prison for "perjury" for refusing to lie under Oath and tell backstabbing lies about Trump, so now they think he will lie under Oath against Trump this time?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN (11 April):
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/10/allen-weisselberg-sent
enced-perjury-trump-fraud-trial
He is 76.
So sure, he plead the case.
He admitted testifying truthfully under oath, and for that - in New York Court, it is called perjury - he will serve some time.
New York corrupt Court, crooked Judge, corrupt AG needed him to lie under oath and say Mar-a-Lago really, really, really was worth only $18 or so, along with all of his other properties, just like the Judge said they were worthless.
But he didn't lie under oath, he never lied about Trump, and so he must pay the price for honestly - being convicted (I think) or at least pleading to perjury.
Yet another win for Trump.
How stupid are they?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Sell it now and make a few bucks then.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Looks like DJT has been hanging around $50.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN (on May 8th):Quote:Knock yourself out. Let us know how it goes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:Oh really?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.Quote:
If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
Right now it's worth $26.55. Just a couple cents more than it was worth on January 19th.
I hope you didn't buy it on day one of the IPO. You're not getting that money back.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/djt?mod=mw_quote_switch
Today DJT closed over $53. On the 9th it closed over $54. I thought it bounced up to $58 one of those days.
Yup, quite the loser. $26 to $54.
Or completely disregard the facts in my last post and hold it until it's worthless.
It ain't my money. You do whatever you feel is right.
And I see that there was zero attempt on your part to enlighten us just as to how a company like DJT is actually making money and legitimately propping up the stock price beyond it being just another gambling site for stock speculators.
You don't seem to be listening. Even though you just quoted the answers.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You don't seem to be listening. Even though you just quoted the answers.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Sell it now and make a few bucks then.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Looks like DJT has been hanging around $50.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN (on May 8th):Quote:Knock yourself out. Let us know how it goes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:Oh really?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.Quote:
If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
Right now it's worth $26.55. Just a couple cents more than it was worth on January 19th.
I hope you didn't buy it on day one of the IPO. You're not getting that money back.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/djt?mod=mw_quote_switch
Today DJT closed over $53. On the 9th it closed over $54. I thought it bounced up to $58 one of those days.
Yup, quite the loser. $26 to $54.
Or completely disregard the facts in my last post and hold it until it's worthless.
It ain't my money. You do whatever you feel is right.
And I see that there was zero attempt on your part to enlighten us just as to how a company like DJT is actually making money and legitimately propping up the stock price beyond it being just another gambling site for stock speculators.
Those aren't answers. Those are just bullshit disguised as sentences.
Explain to me how DJT makes actual tangible profits. What service does it provide and how does it monetize this service? How is it profitable? How much Gross profit does it make from quarter to quarter? How much are their expenses in those same quarters? How much net revenue do they expect next quarter? What do they project for the same quarter five years from now?
You won't answer one of those questions because you CAN'T answer any of those questions.
Have fun gambling.
--------------------------------------------------
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sounds like a couple weeks ago jack Smith got caught mishandling documents, falsifying evidence, in the case where he is trying to convict President Trump of mishandling documents.
That case seems to have come to a screeching halt.
The NYC Fake Trial Scam has "rested, and gambling odds have moved from 95% conviction at beginning of the Show to 50-50 currently.
Of course, the Fake Judge can set aside the verdict and just declare Trump Guilty, just like he did on Day One.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Those aren't answers. Those are just bullshit disguised as sentences.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:You don't seem to be listening. Even though you just quoted the answers.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Sell it now and make a few bucks then.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Looks like DJT has been hanging around $50.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN (on May 8th):Quote:Knock yourself out. Let us know how it goes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:Oh really?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.Quote:
If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
Right now it's worth $26.55. Just a couple cents more than it was worth on January 19th.
I hope you didn't buy it on day one of the IPO. You're not getting that money back.
https://www.marketwatch.com/inve
sting/stock/djt?mod=mw_quote_switch
Today DJT closed over $53. On the 9th it closed over $54. I thought it bounced up to $58 one of those days.
Yup, quite the loser. $26 to $54.
Or completely disregard the facts in my last post and hold it until it's worthless.
It ain't my money. You do whatever you feel is right.
And I see that there was zero attempt on your part to enlighten us just as to how a company like DJT is actually making money and legitimately propping up the stock price beyond it being just another gambling site for stock speculators.
Explain to me how DJT makes actual tangible profits. What service does it provide and how does it monetize this service? How is it profitable? How much Gross profit does it make from quarter to quarter? How much are their expenses in those same quarters? How much net revenue do they expect next quarter? What do they project for the same quarter five years from now?
You won't answer one of those questions because you CAN'T answer any of those questions.
Have fun gambling.
https://ca.video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=fp-tts&p=Donald+
Trump+campaign+donations#id=5&vid=301d9c188f54c32f6d23d99348d28cb3
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-fundraising-crashes-guilty-ver
dict-125835717.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-campaign-hauls-in-53m-in
-donations-post-verdict/vi-BB1nrXLv
I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I was not aware that folk buying DJT were making financial investment choices. I had not heard of this being the case.If Blackrock invests solely in all of the garbage social media, then why would not reasonable folk put their money into the opposite?
That still doesn't explain how this "product" makes any money. Elon Musk spent over $40 Billion on Twitter and he's not making any money. That purchase on his part will never pay for itself, financially, on paper. Never. But it's a powerful social tool with a very wide reach. Arguably the most powerful tool with the widest reach in the history of mankind.
Trump Social will never be Twitter, nor will it ever be a realistic competitor with Twitter, which means that its capability of making any money is less than zero.
You can either tell me now how Trump Social is going to make money, or you can shut the fuck up about your thoughts on this investor trap that is going to end up fleecing people of their wealth when the bottom falls out just like those people who were buying NFTs and AMC and Game Stop stock at the peak already did.
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about here, and you have zero understanding of social media.
--------------------------------------------------
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NeoCons, the Bohemian Grove homosexual Deep state with their pagan babylon robes and the cuckservative label in particular gets under their skin because it gets at a basic truth that Trump will be bent over and whipped by foreign powers including Israel
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
None of that means anything or matters.
they are ruthless and winning, next step is to ban him on ballot access from certain states as they have done with RFK
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Fla case on hold, Judge Cannon to hear arguments that Jack Smith appointment is Unconstitutional. Scheduled to hear in mid-October.
GA case on hold until after election, Appeals Court to hear arguments from Trump's defense team.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SCOTUS threw out 2 of the Fake Charges against Trump for Jan 6, along with most of the Jan 6 defendants.
"Obstruction of Official Proceeding"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yeah. I mentioned that about the political prisoners in another thread the other day.
He just got the big one today though.
Democrats only have 2 choices now. Run with Biden* or replace him. None of their plotting and efforts to keep an election from happening in 2024 were successful.
--------------------------------------------------
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
6 Takeaways From the Supreme Court’s Decision on Trump and Presidential Immunity
By Elie Honig, a former federal and state prosecutor and a contributor to CAFE
Supreme Court
We now have the Supreme Court’s immunity decision and — wow.
In large part, it’s what we expected and forecast in this space. But the Court’s opinion expands presidential power (and bolsters Trump’s legal defenses) substantially more than anybody reasonably predicted.
There’s a lot here, so let’s break down today’s decision. Here are the biggest takeaways.
Criminal immunity exists. This is, in itself, a headline. We’ve recognized civil immunity — protecting federal officials from lawsuits for their official, on-the-job actions — since the 1982 Supreme Court decision Nixon v. Fitzgerald. But, until today, it remained an open question whether there even was such a thing as criminal immunity. Now we know: There is.
Criminal immunity is not “blanket” or “absolute” — but it’s pretty darn broad. This has mostly been a problem of nomenclature. It’s easy to scoff at a claim that a president is immune (absolutely!) for everything he does from the moment he takes the oath of office at noon on January 20 until his term ends four years later. But, in reality, Trump’s team made no such argument to the Supreme Court, though it did (unwisely) float it below. Rather, his team argued for a more limited form of criminal immunity, which the Supreme Court has now accepted and then some. He’s immune, in many circumstances (more on this in a moment) — but no president or former president has all-encompassing, “blanket” coverage.
It all depends on whether the president’s actions were official or unofficial. As expected, and roughly parallel with civil immunity, a president is criminally immune for official acts taken within the scope of the job. But there are two crucial kickers here.
First, the Court will construe the job description quite broadly in the president’s favor. According to the decision, the boss is immune for anything within “the ‘outer perimeter’ of the President’s official responsibilities, covering actions so long as they are ‘not manifestly or palpably beyond his authority.”
Second, while a president cannot be indicted for his official acts, a prosecutor cannot even introduce evidence of any official act as part of a prosecution. So, for example, in DOJ special counsel Jack Smith’s 2020 election subversion case, the Court made clear that Trump’s contacts with the Justice Department (to try to arm-twist prosecutors to investigate and find election fraud) are within the scope of the job and cannot play any part in Smith’s presentation of evidence of the jury, even if necessary to explain the entire sequence of events in a coherent manner.
A president (probably) cannot order SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival and get away with it. As we discussed in a recent column, the SEAL Team Six hypothetical — and Trump’s claim that he could be indicted only if he was first impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate — oversimplified and distorted the actual legal issue at hand. I wrote then, “Count on the Supreme Court blowing past the impeachment argument and rejecting it out of hand. But that won’t end the inquiry. Look for the Court to consider, and potentially to create, a criminal-immunity test based roughly on whether conduct falls within or beyond the president’s official job responsibilities.” That’s essentially what has now happened.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor argues that the Court’s ruling would permit a president to order an assassination without consequences, but I respectfully dissent from that dissent. I don’t see any way a court concludes that such a plot would be an “official act” within the scope of the job. I might be wrong; we don’t know. Justice Sotomayor is right to at least highlight the dilemma.
This trial will not happen before the election. It’s over, folks. The chances of a pre-election trial on Smith’s 2020 election indictment have now slipped from “unlikely
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SCOTUS rules that Presidential Immunity actually exists? SHOCKERS!!
Some Fake News outlets have hammered on the partial portion of the ruling. This is simply because in order to defend the obvious Immunity against the obvious Abuse of DoJ, they needed to not curtail the scope of future presidents, and made expansive opportunities for SCOTUS to support - and so this gave the Court ample room to give table scraps to the Abusive Ministry Of Truth.
Regarding the other charges thrown out, I have not heard if there has been a mass exodus from jails and prisons of those falsely charged (and convicted).
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I have no idea what you just posted. Can you re- explain?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
SCOTUS rules that Presidential Immunity actually exists? SHOCKERS!!
Some Fake News outlets have hammered on the partial portion of the ruling. This is simply because in order to defend the obvious Immunity against the obvious Abuse of DoJ, they needed to not curtail the scope of future presidents, and made expansive opportunities for SCOTUS to support - and so this gave the Court ample room to give table scraps to the Abusive Ministry Of Truth.
Regarding the other charges thrown out, I have not heard if there has been a mass exodus from jails and prisons of those falsely charged (and convicted).
Seems like this gives past Presidents of BOTH parties license to do all sorts of criminal mischief.
That's a mighty big stick to give to either party.
Can't imagine that's what SCOTUS intended, so maybe some examples might help.
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
Why SECOND'S posts are brainless: "I clocked how much time: no more than 10 minutes per day. With cut-and-paste (Ctrl C and Ctrl V) and AI, none of this takes much time."
Or, any verification or thought.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:I have no idea what you just posted. Can you re- explain?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
SCOTUS rules that Presidential Immunity actually exists? SHOCKERS!!
Some Fake News outlets have hammered on the partial portion of the ruling. This is simply because in order to defend the obvious Immunity against the obvious Abuse of DoJ, they needed to not curtail the scope of future presidents, and made expansive opportunities for SCOTUS to support - and so this gave the Court ample room to give table scraps to the Abusive Ministry Of Truth.
Regarding the other charges thrown out, I have not heard if there has been a mass exodus from jails and prisons of those falsely charged (and convicted).
Seems like this gives past Presidents of BOTH parties license to do all sorts of criminal mischief.
That's a mighty big stick to give to either party.
Can't imagine that's what SCOTUS intended, so maybe some examples might help.
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
Why SECOND'S posts are brainless: "I clocked how much time: no more than 10 minutes per day. With cut-and-paste (Ctrl C and Ctrl V) and AI, none of this takes much time."
Or, any verification or thought.
I'd like to know more as well.
Though I'll be the first person to celebrate another Trump win, I wonder if this will be an unfortunate power grab that could be misused by anybody in the future.
If so, anybody crying about it today would be cheering it on when people they vote for use it, and vice versa, until there's really nothing left to fight about.
I'd like to know more about the specifics of this one and ponder over how it might be used and misused in the future.
--------------------------------------------------
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
119 pages.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4743167-read-supreme-cour
t-ruling-trump-immunity-case/
Somebody gonna read it?
--------------------------------------------------
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:When first reading Sig's post, I did not understand what she was confused about.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:I'd like to know more as well.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:I have no idea what you just posted. Can you re- explain?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
SCOTUS rules that Presidential Immunity actually exists? SHOCKERS!!
Some Fake News outlets have hammered on the partial portion of the ruling. This is simply because in order to defend the obvious Immunity against the obvious Abuse of DoJ, they needed to not curtail the scope of future presidents, and made expansive opportunities for SCOTUS to support - and so this gave the Court ample room to give table scraps to the Abusive Ministry Of Truth.
Regarding the other charges thrown out, I have not heard if there has been a mass exodus from jails and prisons of those falsely charged (and convicted).
Seems like this gives past Presidents of BOTH parties license to do all sorts of criminal mischief.
That's a mighty big stick to give to either party.
Can't imagine that's what SCOTUS intended, so maybe some examples might help.
Though I'll be the first person to celebrate another Trump win, I wonder if this will be an unfortunate power grab that could be misused by anybody in the future.
If so, anybody crying about it today would be cheering it on when people they vote for use it, and vice versa, until there's really nothing left to fight about.
I'd like to know more about the specifics of this one and ponder over how it might be used and misused in the future.
Now, I think I understand that Sigs and 6ix have been devout listeners to the Libtard Propaganda broadcasts of M$M.
I can try to parse through what the confusion is, but please let me know if I skip something, because I'm not really on your frequency here.
Most United States Citizens with brain cells has known that there has been Presidential Immunity present and inherent in the Constitution since it was assembled.
Only Libtards, such as Merritless Garland, have not known.
SCOTUS affirmed this common sense knowledge.
However, since Libtards and Garland (at the direction of Lord Darth Obiden's Lawfare orchestration) have challenged common sense, the Defense (in this case, for Trump) needed to be careful to not restrict the immunity of future Presidents by merely failing to include arguments in their brief. By definition, these would include situations far outside the commonly understood Immunity.
Some of these situtations SCOTUS did not recognize as valid.
The Libtard propaganda machine has been rife with unfettered delusions of what common sense and logical decisions could lead to.
One example, which I referred to generally in my first post, is here:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-the-full-supreme-court-deci
sion-on-trump-and-presidential-immunity
Quote:
“Today’s decision to grant former Presidents criminal immunity reshapes the institution of the Presidency,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent. “It makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our Constitution and system of Government, that no man is above the law.”
“The majority today endorses an expansive vision of Presidential immunity that was never recognized by the Founders, any sitting President, the Executive Branch, or even President Trump’s lawyers, until now. Settled under- standings of the Constitution are of little use to the majority in this case, and so it ignores them,” Sotomayor said.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Much commentary has been given about what an imbecile Sotomayor has been, and how her opinion looks like it was written by a 2nd grade child who has never encountered the U.S. Constitution before. She is utterly embarrassing.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What do you expect?
DEI.
--------------------------------------------------
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump Classified Docs Case Dismissed, Judge Finds Special Counsel Appointment Unconstitutional
"The Special Counsel’s position effectively usurps that important legislative authority, transferring it to a Head of Department, and in the process threatening the structural liberty inherent in the separation of powers," Cannon wrote in her decision. "He can be appointed and confirmed through the default method prescribed in the Appointments Clause, as Congress has directed for United States Attorneys throughout American history."
"Dismissal of this action is the only appropriate solution for the Appointments Clause violation."
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trump-classified-docs-case-dismissed
-judge-finds-special-counsel-appointment
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
Why SECOND'S posts are brainless: "I clocked how much time: no more than 10 minutes per day. With cut-and-paste (Ctrl C and Ctrl V) and AI, none of this takes much time."
Or, any verification or thought.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Peter Navarro released from prison, in time to speak at RNC.
Another win.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Landmark Legal Foundation (Mark Levin) provided the Amicus Brief to SCOTUS, detailing all the ways Jack Smith's appointment and persecution were both Unconstitutional.
In a diverging opinion, Justice Thomas openly questioned the Unconstitutionality of both the appointment and the persecution.
Once this opinion was published, the Judge was obligated to review the case before her, and throw it out.
Quote:Is anybody shocked that AOC has initiated Impeachment proceedings against Justice Thomas?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Trump Classified Docs Case Dismissed, Judge Finds Special Counsel Appointment Unconstitutional
"The Special Counsel’s position effectively usurps that important legislative authority, transferring it to a Head of Department, and in the process threatening the structural liberty inherent in the separation of powers," Cannon wrote in her decision. "He can be appointed and confirmed through the default method prescribed in the Appointments Clause, as Congress has directed for United States Attorneys throughout American history."
"Dismissal of this action is the only appropriate solution for the Appointments Clause violation."
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trump-classified-docs-case-dismissed
-judge-finds-special-counsel-appointment
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
Why SECOND'S posts are brainless: "I clocked how much time: no more than 10 minutes per day. With cut-and-paste (Ctrl C and Ctrl V) and AI, none of this takes much time."
Or, any verification or thought.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/trump-election-subversion-case-returned-1829
17448.html
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump "sentencing" postponed until after Election.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Clownshow continues, he is not winning
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
a Clinton appointed Judge Hellerstein? which side is he on does he also support open borders for the USA and Walls for Israel? and what happens if an Orthodox Jew swears on the Bible but does not believe in Jesus, should he swear upon the State of Israel instead? he also ruled to leave human remains in a 'garbage dump' after 911 saying 'the city is not required to re-sift through debris from ground zero in search of bits of human remain' and many other Jewish Israeli American multiple citizen jurists? Associate
Justice, Judges and Attorney, Attorneys general and Lawyers in courts of appeals with influence on US politics http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7494633.stm
Judge delays Trump sentencing in hush money case until after November election
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/judge-delays-trump-sente
ncing-hush-money-case-november-rcna167282
you think its bad now? just wait until a sizable amount of islamics and jihad men and women get in with their notions of 'Justice'
not winning, clownshow goes on
"Justice delayed is justice denied" is a legal maxim
the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution says an accused US citizen or person of the USA shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Judge in GA throws out 2 of the charges today.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yup.
Those that haven't been will be, and those that stuck will be appealed outside of NYC courts and will all be thrown out.
It's a fucking tragedy what people like Second and Ted let their government and media get away with. They will be the end of our country.
--------------------------------------------------
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/26/trump-civil-fraud-appeal-oral
-arguments-00181339
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Apparently he just won a bunch.
With the new RNC, it sounds like they won every case they brought during ReSteal 2024, stopping much of the Fraud Vote.
Did they actually lose any?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Apparently, this thread can be closed along with all of Ted's tick tock threads.
AFAIK anything that he hasn't already gotten overturned by bringing it to a court that isn't full of partisan hacks in an area where they wouldn't be able to stuff a jury full of Trump-hating partisan hacks will now all just disappear.
Maybe keep this thread up long enough to document all the wins and keep track of anything that has yet to be overturned until the day that it happens.
--------------------------------------------------
Trump is fine.
He is also your current President. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
They can say a convicted Felon was elected
but the past Lawfare clownshow is over
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://archive.ph/8XQhP
The wins are really piling up.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/article/appeals-court-panel-stops-order-t
o-wind-down-operations-at-alligator-alcatraz-in-everglades/
That didn't take too long. They almost had time to take down the sign.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump is still calling that whole Royal Mossad blackmail island and Jewy Epstein 'a hoax'
is this his own ego insanity in typical action
or is he covering up for Jew criminals and Israelis like Ehud Barak
blame 'Democrats'
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Commissioner Slaughter is out, again. POTUS can fire Deep State deadwood.
https://www.newsweek.com/john-roberts-donald-trump-supreme-court-win-f
tc-slaughter-firing-2126442
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Remember when SCOTUS said AZ and TX could not enforce Federal Immigration Law, or have parallel State Laws duplicating Federal Immigration Law?
Because that was the job of the Feds?
Well, now States still can't intrude on Federal Enforcement by having Sanctuary State Laws or Sanctuary City laws.
https://dnyuz.com/2025/09/08/scotus-allows-ice-agents-to-keep-arrestin
g-illegal-aliens-in-sanctuary-city-los-angeles/
Gotcha.
While Trump is playing 3D Chess, I don't think Libtards are even up to the level of Checkers. More like Tic Tac Toe.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Judge States defendants were exercising their Constitutional Rights.
https://www.aol.com/news/michigan-judge-dismisses-charges-against-2305
50966.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15082001/Democratic-judge-Tru
mp-stunning-victory.html
Trump was an unindicted coconspirator!! Yep, conspiring to abide by, and adhere to The Constitution. Shall not be tolerated during Democrat regimes.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Judge States defendants were exercising their Constitutional Rights.
https://www.aol.com/news/michigan-judge-dismisses-charges-against-2305
50966.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15082001/Democratic-judge-Tru
mp-stunning-victory.html
Trump was an unindicted coconspirator!! Yep, conspiring to abide by, and adhere to The Constitution. Shall not be tolerated during Democrat regimes.
Wow...
That's an interesting one.
Did you notice that she threw a backhanded insult at the Republicans in question too?
They weren't "sophisticated" enough to pull off that particular "heist".
She's probably not wrong.

I'm actually besides myself with shock at this moment. When in the last 8 years have you seen a judge of any race or color who was appointed by Joe Biden* or Barack Obama* rule in favor of Trump or Republicans in general? And a black woman to boot?
Do we actually have a good justice that was appointed by Democrats who actually has the critical thinking skills the rest of them don't possess?
Or did somebody bribe her?
It's one or the other. That's all I know.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Geez, I had to put in 10 words before the search engine would spit out a pertinent hit, and even then, just this single one:
https://apnews.com/article/trump-california-national-guard-troops-08f8
a71ca5834b8f32ce4c3ee944abca
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Boston, 1st Circuit:
https://www.courthousenews.com/1st-circuit-undoes-stay-on-trump-parole
-reversals/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
9th Circuit
https://www.courthousenews.com/ninth-circuit-preserves-trumps-refugee-
restrictions/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Gang members in DACA. Applications accelerated from 20,000 per year in 2018 to 70,000 in 2024, total of 300,000 since 2013.
https://www.newyorkupstate.com/news/2025/09/thousands-of-young-immigra
nts-in-new-york-face-deportation-after-trump-suddenly-changed-rules.html
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
They are all going home. Every single one of them and their kids.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/trump-says-georgia-election-interference-214
421787.html
Now somebody arrest her for her Federal Crimes. Conspiring, in The White House to synchronize and orchestrate Lawfare against the lawfully elected President from 2020, among others.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hear, Hear!
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Rebecca Slaughter loses.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/09/supreme-court-allows-trump-to-fire-
ftc-commissioner/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Not a current court case, but the result of corrupt NY corrupt AG corrupt Letitia James corruption.
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae closing offices in NY.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/exclusive-fannie-mae-freddie-macs-ny-
offices-shutter-response-ag-james-corrupt-practices
https://wrenews.com/report-fhfa-closing-fannie-mae-and-freddie-macs-ny
-offices-due-to-letitia-james-corrupt-and-dangerous-business-practices/
https://commstrader.com/politics/exclusive-fannie-mae-freddie-macs-ny-
offices-to-shutter-in-response-to-ag-james-corrupt-practices/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Libtard Neo-Confederates playing Tic Tac Toe, Trump playing 3D Chess.
https://www.kwqc.com/2025/10/06/judge-wont-block-federal-troop-deploym
ent-chicago-now/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://nypost.com/2025/10/20/us-news/9th-circuit-court-rules-trump-ca
n-deploy-national-guard-to-portland/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/portland
-national-guard-court-trump-b2848795.html
https://globalnews.ca/news/11486175/trump-national-guard-portland-appe
al-ruling/
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/us-politics/article-trump-portla
nd-national-guard-troops-oregon-appeals-court/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://abc7news.com/post/more-100-immigration-judges-fired-trumps-ina
uguration-white-house-targets-lawyers/17503922/
Finally. The Trump firing activist Judges.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Scathing Opinion from Judge Jerry Smith, including rebuke of Judicial Misbehavior by corrupt rogue activist Judge Jeffrey Vincent Brown in Texas Redistricting case. Including PAGES of list of errors, lies, and misbehavior at the end of the Opinion.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/11/20/texas-redistricting-most-scathi
ng-denunciation-of-court-decision-ive-ever-read/
https://realamericasvoice.substack.com/p/scathing-dissent-rocks-texas-
redistricting
https://ussanews.com/2025/11/20/texas-redistricting-the-most-scathing-
denunciation-of-a-court-decision-ive-ever-read/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
We are actively dealing with enemies of the American People.
They're all being exposed now for who they truly are.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I don't even understand this reporting, or the thought behind anything here...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/ro-khanna-explains-how-he-helped-
engineer-the-vote-that-ripped-maga-apart/ar-AA1QJodj
You fell into a trap, buddy.
Not only isn't anybody acknowledging you, but most of the media went complete blackout on the Epstein situation the last 2 days.
I think the ACTUAL plan was to use stooges like you and MTG to make a huge media circus out of this, and watch as Trump forced Republicans to block it by going straight to TruthSocial and screaming about how he was going to primary any Republican who voted to release them. If he did what you all thought he was going to do, he'd be spending the next 3 years doing everything he could to block or at least stall them from coming out. And that would have worked if it went down that way too. That would have shut down the rest of his agenda for the next 3 years with Epstein in the media every day.
I mean, yeah... It was working there for 2 or 3 weeks. You had idiots like Ted and Second calling him President Pedophile and all sorts of shit, and having them try to get under everyone else's skin like chiggers.
But how long was that going to go on for when Trump's got nothing to worry about on that list?
I know the idiots here and on BlueSky are hoping that this is finally the time that they got him and Trump is going down, but you've been let down so many hundreds of times by now you should know better.
Enjoy the slight bump in name recognition for the weekend, Ro, and maybe a little bit more in the next 30 days, but that's about it dude.
People are going to go down. I think it's pretty obvious right now that you're not one of them. But there will be people offered up for this, and though I have zero doubt that a lot of people will be shielded from the fallout, there will be casualties on both sides.
SPOILER ALERT: Trump isn't going to be one of them. And Democrats are in such a weak position nationally right now that you're going to lose a lot in the closed door negotiations figuring out exactly who is going to be taking the fall here.
If you actually cared at all, you should and would have released this information while Joe Biden* was President, but you all waited to make a big fucking noise about it 5 years later when it was politically convenient. Since we all know that there are guilty parties on both sides, I can completely understand why you swept it under the rug for 4 years, but why try to force it now? Other than pulling a bluff for the next 3 years and making everyone watch Trump desperately try to suppress this if he were guilty, what was the plan? Was there a plan for how it went down? I don't see how you possibly could have had a Plan B here because I don't think any of this went according to your plan at all and you didn't even see this coming.
And The American People know that there are a LOT of people who voted to release those files this week on both sides that just fucked themselves over if Trump doesn't do what everyone, for some reason, got it in their heads he was going to do.
For the first time in a while, I'm pretty fucking confused about what just went down. Strategically, none of this makes sense, particularly when trying to see it through a Democratic Politician's lens.
The way I see it, one of two things just happened here...
1. I'm wrong, and not only is Trump on that list but there's video proof of him doing the unspeakable and he just got couped.
2. Trump played everyone on a long con and just got a lot of really dumb fucking child rapists that we voted into office on both sides to destroy their own lives. Seemingly for no reason.
Not that I would ever expect any politician to do the right thing, let alone one of these people on this issue, but what is the thinking here? There's a zero percent chance that nobody is guilty on either side. What were those people told to vote in fav
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The Opinion:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Scathing Opinion from Judge Jerry Smith, including rebuke of Judicial Misbehavior by corrupt rogue activist Judge Jeffrey Vincent Brown in Texas Redistricting case. Including PAGES of list of errors, lies, and misbehavior at the end of the Opinion.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/11/20/texas-redistricting-most-scathi
ng-denunciation-of-court-decision-ive-ever-read/
https://realamericasvoice.substack.com/p/scathing-dissent-rocks-texas-
redistricting
https://ussanews.com/2025/11/20/texas-redistricting-the-most-scathing-
denunciation-of-a-court-decision-ive-ever-read/
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1150387/gov.
uscourts.txwd.1150387.1439.0.pdf
The last 2 pages are a partial list of Judge Brown's lies and falsehoods.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:https://www.axios.com/local/san-antonio/2025/11/22/supreme-court-texas
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:The Opinion:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Scathing Opinion from Judge Jerry Smith, including rebuke of Judicial Misbehavior by corrupt rogue activist Judge Jeffrey Vincent Brown in Texas Redistricting case. Including PAGES of list of errors, lies, and misbehavior at the end of the Opinion.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/11/20/texas-redistricting-most-scathi
ng-denunciation-of-court-decision-ive-ever-read/
https://realamericasvoice.substack.com/p/scathing-dissent-rocks-texas-
redistricting
https://ussanews.com/2025/11/20/texas-redistricting-the-most-scathing-
denunciation-of-a-court-decision-ive-ever-read/
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1150387/gov.
uscourts.txwd.1150387.1439.0.pdf
The last 2 pages are a partial list of Judge Brown's lies and falsehoods.
-congressional-map-redistricting
Saw that one coming. Didn't take long at all.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
More Immigration judges.
https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/notice_eoir_announces_39_new_immigr
ation_judges_11072023.pdf
More Deportation judges.
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/doj-immigration-judges/2025/11/21/id/
1235560/
roh row
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Start in Dearborn. Right now.
Otherwise, that will be ground zero for the 2nd Civil War.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
ABC NEWS: Georgia prosecutor drops election interference case against Trump, others
It marks the end of the two major election interference cases Trump faced.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/georgia-prosecutor-drops-election-interferen
ce-case-trump/story?id=127898245
Quote:
The Fulton County, Georgia, election interference case against President Donald Trump and others has been dismissed after the prosecutor who took over the case requested that it be dropped.
"In my professional judgment, the citizens of Georgia are not served by pursuing this case in full for another five to ten years," wrote Pete Skandalakis, the executive director of the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council of Georgia, who took over the case after the original prosecutor was disqualified from the case.
Within minutes of Skandalakis' court filing, the judge overseeing the case granted the request and dismissed the case.
"This case is hereby dismissed in its entirety," wrote Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee, who earlier this month had scheduled a Dec. 1 "status/pretrial" hearing in the case.
Trump and 18 others pleaded not guilty in August 2023 to all charges in a sweeping racketeering indictment for alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in the state of Georgia.
Another one bites the dust.
Womp, womp.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
On Ilan Omar... She won't be our problem for much longer.
Trump attends to the Omar matter
Quote:
On Wednesday evening President Trump gave a statement on the shooting of the National Guardsmen near the White House. In his statement he took up the Minnesota fraud cases. At about 2:00 President Trump asserted that “hundreds of thousands” of Somalis are “ripping off our country and ripping apart that once great state [of Minnesota]. Billions of dollars are lost and gangs of Somalians come from a country that doesn’t even have a government, no laws, no military, nothing — as their representatives in our country preach to us about our Constitution and how our country is no good.”
“Hundreds of thousands” is an exaggeration. We have some 100,000 Somali citizens and residents in Minnesota. In the United States we have “hundreds of thousands” of Somalis in total. The number committing fraud in Minnesota must number in the hundreds rather than the thousands. However, we certainly have a serious problem and Trump did everything but call out Ilhan Omar by name.
President Trump has adopted the expression “Thank you for your attention to this matter.” Attending to the matter of the massive public-programs fraud committed by Minnesota Somalis, Trump inevitably turned to Minnesota Fifth District Rep. Ilhan Omar. Omar can serve as Exhibit A in the matter of Somali fraud. It may be her highest and best use.
Trump returned to Omar late last night in the X post below. He garbled the facts, as he did in his comments on Wednesday evening, but he nailed the essence:
[T]he worst “Congressman/woman” in our Country, Ilhan Omar, always wrapped in her swaddling hijab, and who probably came into the U.S.A. illegally in that you are not allowed to marry your brother, does nothing but hatefully complain about our Country, its Constitution, and how “badly” she is treated, when her place of origin is a decadent, backward, and crime ridden nation, which is essentially not even a country for lack of Government, Military, Police, schools, etc.
I have been on Omar’s case since August 2016. I summarized my initiation in the City Journal column “The curious case of Ilhan Omar.” I believe that Omar entered the United States illegally as a fradulent member of the Omar family. Getting out of Kenya, the family was split. A brother and sister emigrated to England. The brother was brought to Minneapolis to extract him from a homosexual life in London.
Omar married her brother in 2009, probably for purposes of immigration fraud. A Christian pastor signed their marriage license. Omar continued living with her “real” husband and father of her children all the while. She also filed joint tax returns with her “real” husband (even though she had never legally married him) while she was legally married to her brother.
The hijab that Trump mocks appears to be a prop. She is a one-woman crime wave. Rob Long turned the saga into the hilarious 2019 National Review column “That’s My Husbro: Ilhan Omar’s Family Drama.”
Omar has now obtained a divorce from her brother, married and divorced her “real” husband, and married the man who was her non-Muslim campaign fundraiser. Omar had taken up with him while she was still married to her real husband (she legally married him in January 2018 and divorced him in November 2019).
David Steinberg tied up loose threads in the curious case in a 2019 Power Line post. At the moment that six-year-old post is the most read on Power Line. David has linked to it on X. It has become timely again.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/07/david-steinberg-tying-u
p-loose-threads-in-the-curious-case.php
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hell... If I were a gay person I'd be pissed off reading that. They didn't get their marriages legalized until Obama was President.
But just like these scumbags have learned our laws from top to bottom to exploit America and take it over from within, Omar was just abusing the fuck out of our marriage laws and the government benefits they provide, and nobody in the Democratic Party even pretended they saw anything.
All of these people need to go.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:This seems like a lie. The Somali Autism Scam has revealed that 1 of every 15 Somali kids is diagnosed with Autism, as of 2023. Vast majority of those are scams. Those would amount to about 6,000 of the 100k Somali population in MN. Plus each kid has 2 parents involved in the Terrorist-funding scam. Or as many as 18,000. And that is only the Autism Scam, not including SNAP fraud, Medicare fraud, Medicaid fraud, and others. If the Autism Scam was only 1/4 of the fraud committed by MN Somalis, that could indicate that 72,000 Somalis are perpetrators of fraud.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
On Ilan Omar... She won't be our problem for much longer.
Trump attends to the Omar matterQuote:
On Wednesday evening President Trump gave a statement on the shooting of the National Guardsmen near the White House. In his statement he took up the Minnesota fraud cases. At about 2:00 President Trump asserted that “hundreds of thousands” of Somalis are “ripping off our country and ripping apart that once great state [of Minnesota]. Billions of dollars are lost and gangs of Somalians come from a country that doesn’t even have a government, no laws, no military, nothing — as their representatives in our country preach to us about our Constitution and how our country is no good.”
“Hundreds of thousands” is an exaggeration. We have some 100,000 Somali citizens and residents in Minnesota. In the United States we have “hundreds of thousands” of Somalis in total. The number committing fraud in Minnesota must number in the hundreds rather than the thousands.
"number in the hundreds," my azz.
Quote:Quote:
However, we certainly have a serious problem and Trump did everything but call out Ilhan Omar by name.
President Trump has adopted the expression “Thank you for your attention to this matter.” Attending to the matter of the massive public-programs fraud committed by Minnesota Somalis, Trump inevitably turned to Minnesota Fifth District Rep. Ilhan Omar. Omar can serve as Exhibit A in the matter of Somali fraud. It may be her highest and best use.
Trump returned to Omar late last night in the X post below. He garbled the facts, as he did in his comments on Wednesday evening, but he nailed the essence:
[T]he worst “Congressman/woman” in our Country, Ilhan Omar, always wrapped in her swaddling hijab, and who probably came into the U.S.A. illegally in that you are not allowed to marry your brother, does nothing but hatefully complain about our Country, its Constitution, and how “badly” she is treated, when her place of origin is a decadent, backward, and crime ridden nation, which is essentially not even a country for lack of Government, Military, Police, schools, etc.
I have been on Omar’s case since August 2016. I summarized my initiation in the City Journal column “The curious case of Ilhan Omar.” I believe that Omar entered the United States illegally as a fradulent member of the Omar family. Getting out of Kenya, the family was split. A brother and sister emigrated to England. The brother was brought to Minneapolis to extract him from a homosexual life in London.
Omar married her brother in 2009, probably for purposes of immigration fraud. A Christian pastor signed their marriage license. Omar continued living with her “real” husband and father of her children all the while. She also filed joint tax returns with her “real” husband (even though she had never legally married him) while she was legally married to her brother.
The hijab that Trump mocks appears to be a prop. She is a one-woman crime wave. Rob Long turned the saga into the hilarious 2019 National Review column “That’s My Husbro: Ilhan Omar’s Family Drama.”
Omar has now obtained a divorce from her brother, married and divorced her “real” husband, and married the man who was her non-Muslim campaign fundraiser. Omar had taken up with him while she was still married to her real husband (she legally married him in January 2018 and divorced him in November 2019).
David Steinberg tied up loose threads in t
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/texas-trump-backed-congressional-map-2335345
60.html
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SCOTUS accepts Appeal.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/trump-v-slaughter-an-explainer/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
If this linky works:
This is about Judge Boasberg and Judge Xinis being slapped down by sensible courts.
This guy does a great job of going through the decisions and explaining all. Pointing out their Activist wranglings and how they self-owned.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ohhhh...
Would I love to see that motherfucker go down.
I'm not watching the video though because I refuse to watch any videos with clickbait bullshit like BIG BOLD LETTERS AND EXCLAMATION POINTS!!!!! and those fucking arrows that are always pointing at nothing, or as in this case, are completely superfluous.
I'll leave that for idiots like Ted to watch.
If you've got any good links to legit news sources on the story, please feel free to post them here in reply.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/04/in-major-voting-rights-act-case-sup
reme-court-strikes-down-redistricting-map-challenged-as-racia/
It is not really even a Trump case, but it is an anti-obama case, so a big win for America.
6ix, it's not even June.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
VASSC didn't waste much time.
https://nypost.com/2026/05/08/us-news/virginia-supreme-court-overrules
-democratic-gerrymander/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yup.
I post about these things in the cases that Trump is losing though just to make sure that the two idiots see it.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME