Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, April 14, 2025 23:28
VIEWED: 487388
PAGE 8 of 41
Quote:It increases the National Debt by $trillions. I believe you were concerned that the $trillions in quantitative easing would eventually ruin the lives of Americans but now you have overlooked the new $trillions in National Debt. Maybe you ought to change your opinion about the benefits for yourself from that tax bill? I'll not change my opinion because the tax bill will immensely benefit me. I loved quantitative easing and love that tax bill. I will love it when Trump signs it into law. It shall be a day of celebration!
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I read the breakdown of the tax bill that you showed me the other day. There's nothing in there that hurts the 99%, at least how that was broken down.
www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quantitative-easing.asp
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:It increases the National Debt by $trillions. I believe you were concerned that the $trillions in quantitative easing would eventually ruin the lives of Americans but now you have overlooked the new $trillions in National Debt. Maybe you ought to change your opinion about the benefits for yourself from that tax bill?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I read the breakdown of the tax bill that you showed me the other day. There's nothing in there that hurts the 99%, at least how that was broken down.
It said that part of the tax plan is to increase the national debt in ten years by 2 Trillion, which as bad as that sounds is severely putting the breaks on the additions after they gained great speed with GWB's administration (Doubled it) and went completely off the rails during Obama's administration (Further tripled it).
An increase of 2 Trillion is tiny compared to the existing national debt. That's why I stated earlier that I don't believe that projection, but that IS the proposed projection under the tax plan.
Quote:
I'll not change my opinion because the tax bill will immensely benefit me. I loved quantitative easing and love that tax bill. I will love it when Trump signs it into law. It shall be a day of celebration!
This comes as absolutely no surprise to me or anyone else on this board.
You LOVE to virtue signal all day long, but at the end of the day you're just a greedy elitist.
If you actually gave two shits about anybody you're supposedly "fighting" for, you'd be talking about how you were going to take those millions of unearned dollars you're going to be getting and donating them or doing missionary work with them.
But you're not going to do that are you, armchair warrior.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:BJ Clinton was
Originally posted by Oonjerah:
President
Quote:Yes. Maybe the downfall started with Slick Willie. Or perhaps the other BJ - LBJ.
a slime-ball, non-aristocrat, pathetic, bad joke.
... But with his foolish egomania, he's dangerous, too.
Used to be, we often elected Statesmen, professionals in governing.
Our second choice was often a general.
Guys who could spell and define "responsibility."
... oooOO}{OOooo ...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Well, of all people, certainly he who would know best is Obamination's White House Counsel.
Originally posted by second:Quote:“The president cannot obstruct justice because he is the chief law enforcement officer under [the constitution’s Article II] and has every right to express his view of any case.”
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Maybe giving up arguing with liberal meat-puppets.
1 year later and still waiting for something...anything to happen is all.
Contradicting Trump's lawyer is Bob Bauer, a New York University law professor and former White House counsel to Barack Obama, who said: “It is certainly possible for a president to obstruct justice.”
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:More unattributed quotes. Are they all from Obama and Clinton Lawyers? Or did you throw in some Carter, Blabbermouth, Jordan Lawyers too?
Originally posted by second:
Trump’s lawyer: the president can’t obstruct justice. 13 legal experts: yes, he can.Quote:
I believe the better view, supported by a reading of the Constitution, is that the president cannot say to a prosecutor, "I know Person A lied to you, which is a felony, but you should drop the investigation against Person A." Those who drew up articles of impeachment against former Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton clearly thought the president could be guilty of obstruction of justice because that charge was included against both of them.Quote:www.vox.com/2017/12/4/16733422/fbi-deal-trump-flynn-russia-comey
If the president interferes or impedes an FBI investigation with "corrupt intent," that's obstruction of justice under 18 USC 1512(c)(2). Trump has essentially confessed three times to his corrupt intent in firing Comey: on May 10 in the Oval Office, on May 11 to NBC's Lester Holt, and then in his tweet on Saturday (awareness that Flynn had committed a crime).
Very few Republican voters will understand what is wrong with "obstructing justice" in either the legal sense or the commonsense definitions, therefore there will be no consequences whatsoever for Trump. The Democrat Senators are not numerous enough to make consequences.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Six, you almost exposed the numbers here. But good to spotlight Second's duplicity.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:It increases the National Debt by $trillions. I believe you were concerned that the $trillions in quantitative easing would eventually ruin the lives of Americans but now you have overlooked the new $trillions in National Debt. Maybe you ought to change your opinion about the benefits for yourself from that tax bill?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I read the breakdown of the tax bill that you showed me the other day. There's nothing in there that hurts the 99%, at least how that was broken down.
It said that part of the tax plan is to increase the national debt in ten years by 2 Trillion, which as bad as that sounds is severely putting the breaks on the additions after they gained great speed with GWB's administration (Doubled it) and went completely off the rails during Obama's administration (Further tripled it).
An increase of 2 Trillion is tiny compared to the existing national debt. That's why I stated earlier that I don't believe that projection, but that IS the proposed projection under the tax plan.Quote:
I'll not change my opinion because the tax bill will immensely benefit me. I loved quantitative easing and love that tax bill. I will love it when Trump signs it into law. It shall be a day of celebration!
This comes as absolutely no surprise to me or anyone else on this board.
You LOVE to virtue signal all day long, but at the end of the day you're just a greedy elitist.
If you actually gave two shits about anybody you're supposedly "fighting" for, you'd be talking about how you were going to take those millions of unearned dollars you're going to be getting and donating them or doing missionary work with them.
But you're not going to do that are you, armchair warrior.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
I don't have a great breakdown right this moment, but on this day 2000 the Federal Debt was 5.6 Trillion, before Bush43 took office. His original proposal to reduce the DEBT (immediately eliminating the Deficit) was so aggressive that it eliminated the DEBT within 10 years (2010). But that did not include funding the War to resolve Clinton's flirtations with and avoidance of Osama.
So by 2004 the DEBT was 7.3 Trillion, an increase of 1.7 Trillion in 4 years.
By 2007, before the Rock The Vote Democraps hadvtheir Budget reins in effect, the DEBT was 8.9 Trillion, an increase of 1.6 Trillion in 3 years.
By 2008 the Rock The Vote Democraps had a full year of Budget reins and cranked up the Debt to almost 10 Trillion, or 1.1 Trillion in a 1-year span.
Now the Debt is 20.6 Trillion. And Second is hysterical about a 2 Trillion increase over 10 years?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Well, of all people, certainly he who would know best is Obamination's White House Counsel.
Originally posted by second:Quote:“The president cannot obstruct justice because he is the chief law enforcement officer under [the constitution’s Article II] and has every right to express his view of any case.”
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Maybe giving up arguing with liberal meat-puppets.
1 year later and still waiting for something...anything to happen is all.
Contradicting Trump's lawyer is Bob Bauer, a New York University law professor and former White House counsel to Barack Obama, who said: “It is certainly possible for a president to obstruct justice.”
Jeff Sessions, Mitch McConnell, 40+ others in GOP Congress think obstruction of justice should get a President removed
Although Trump's personal lawyer John Dowd conveniently thinks that U.S. presidents are above the law and can't be removed from office for obstructing justice, Jeff Sessions, Mitch McConnell, and dozens of other GOP members of Congress disagree.
At least they strongly disagreed back in 1999, when it suited their agenda to get Bill Clinton impeached for his obstruction of justice during the Monica Lewinsky investigation.
Back then, Jeff Sessions, an Alabama Senator said, “The facts are disturbing and compelling on the President's intent to obstruct justice." And Sessions wasn't alone.
According to Politico:
More than 40 current GOP members of Congress voted for the impeachment or removal of Clinton from office for obstruction of justice. They include Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell – who mounted his own passionate appeal to remove Clinton from office for obstruction of justice – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, who was a House member at the time.
https://boingboing.net/2017/12/04/jeff-sessions-mitch-mcconnell.html
Sessions argued in Clinton impeachment that presidents can obstruct justice
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/04/jeff-sessions-president-obst
ruct-justice-bill-clinton-278517
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Jeff Sessions, Mitch McConnell, 40+ others in GOP Congress think obstruction of justice should get a President removed
Although Trump's personal lawyer John Dowd conveniently thinks that U.S. presidents are above the law and can't be removed from office for obstructing justice, Jeff Sessions, Mitch McConnell, and dozens of other GOP members of Congress disagree.
At least they strongly disagreed back in 1999, when it suited their agenda to get Bill Clinton impeached for his obstruction of justice during the Monica Lewinsky investigation.
Back then, Jeff Sessions, an Alabama Senator said, “The facts are disturbing and compelling on the President's intent to obstruct justice." And Sessions wasn't alone.
According to Politico:
More than 40 current GOP members of Congress voted for the impeachment or removal of Clinton from office for obstruction of justice. They include Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell – who mounted his own passionate appeal to remove Clinton from office for obstruction of justice – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, who was a House member at the time.
https://boingboing.net/2017/12/04/jeff-sessions-mitch-mcconnell.html
Sessions argued in Clinton impeachment that presidents can obstruct justice
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/04/jeff-sessions-president-obst
ruct-justice-bill-clinton-278517
I find no comfort in this.
==============================
I know what you mean.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Six, you almost exposed the numbers here. But good to spotlight Second's duplicity.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:It increases the National Debt by $trillions. I believe you were concerned that the $trillions in quantitative easing would eventually ruin the lives of Americans but now you have overlooked the new $trillions in National Debt. Maybe you ought to change your opinion about the benefits for yourself from that tax bill?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I read the breakdown of the tax bill that you showed me the other day. There's nothing in there that hurts the 99%, at least how that was broken down.
It said that part of the tax plan is to increase the national debt in ten years by 2 Trillion, which as bad as that sounds is severely putting the breaks on the additions after they gained great speed with GWB's administration (Doubled it) and went completely off the rails during Obama's administration (Further tripled it).
An increase of 2 Trillion is tiny compared to the existing national debt. That's why I stated earlier that I don't believe that projection, but that IS the proposed projection under the tax plan.Quote:
I'll not change my opinion because the tax bill will immensely benefit me. I loved quantitative easing and love that tax bill. I will love it when Trump signs it into law. It shall be a day of celebration!
This comes as absolutely no surprise to me or anyone else on this board.
You LOVE to virtue signal all day long, but at the end of the day you're just a greedy elitist.
If you actually gave two shits about anybody you're supposedly "fighting" for, you'd be talking about how you were going to take those millions of unearned dollars you're going to be getting and donating them or doing missionary work with them.
But you're not going to do that are you, armchair warrior.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
I don't have a great breakdown right this moment, but on this day 2000 the Federal Debt was 5.6 Trillion, before Bush43 took office. His original proposal to reduce the DEBT (immediately eliminating the Deficit) was so aggressive that it eliminated the DEBT within 10 years (2010). But that did not include funding the War to resolve Clinton's flirtations with and avoidance of Osama.
So by 2004 the DEBT was 7.3 Trillion, an increase of 1.7 Trillion in 4 years.
By 2007, before the Rock The Vote Democraps hadvtheir Budget reins in effect, the DEBT was 8.9 Trillion, an increase of 1.6 Trillion in 3 years.
By 2008 the Rock The Vote Democraps had a full year of Budget reins and cranked up the Debt to almost 10 Trillion, or 1.1 Trillion in a 1-year span.
Now the Debt is 20.6 Trillion. And Second is hysterical about a 2 Trillion increase over 10 years?
Yeah...
Don't think I didn't miss the lack of reply from Second. He almost never answers me directly, but always quotes me and posts a somewhat vaguely related story based off of a single sentence of one of my replies to completely deflect any point I was trying to make.
I had him dead to rights here, and he knows it.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Hey 6ixStringJack. I haven't the will to convince you of anything. But keep on thinking you are right and I am wrong because your self-confidence is working out so very well for you and delivering material rewards to you every day, I'm sure.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yeah...
Don't think I didn't miss the lack of reply from Second. He almost never answers me directly, but always quotes me and posts a somewhat vaguely related story based off of a single sentence of one of my replies to completely deflect any point I was trying to make.
I had him dead to rights here, and he knows it.
Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, which is investigating the Trump campaign, said Mueller’s reported subpoena of Deutsche Bank “would be a very significant development”.
“If Russia laundered money through the Trump Organization, it would be far more compromising than any salacious video and could be used as leverage against Donald Trump and his associates and family,” Schiff said in a statement.
Deutsche Bank told Bloomberg in a statement that it always cooperated with investigating authorities.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/05/donald-trump-bank-records-hand
ed-over-robert-mueller
Mueller asked Deutsche Bank for data on accounts held by President Donald Trump and his family, a person close to the matter said on Tuesday.
Germany’s largest bank received a subpoena from Special Counsel Robert Mueller several weeks ago to provide information on certain money and credit transactions, the person said, adding key documents had been handed over in the meantime.
The German bank is one of the few major lenders that has lent large amounts to Trump in the past decade. A string of bankruptcies at his hotel and casino businesses during the 1990s made most of Wall Street wary of extending him credit.
A U.S. official with knowledge of Mueller’s probe said one reason for the subpoenas was to find out whether Deutsche Bank may have sold some of Trump’s mortgage or other loans to Russian state development bank VEB or other Russian banks that now are under U.S. and European Union sanctions.
Holding such debt, particularly if some of it was or is coming due, could potentially give Russian banks some leverage over Trump, especially if they are state-owned, said a second U.S. official familiar with Russian intelligence methods.
“One obvious question is why Trump and those around him expressed interest in improving relations with Russia as a top foreign policy priority, and whether or not any personal considerations played any part in that,” the second official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
There was no immediate response to the Deutsche Bank subpoena from Trump’s lawyers.
The subpoena was earlier reported by German daily Handelsblatt.
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-deutsche-bank/deutsche-bank-gets-
subpoena-from-mueller-on-trump-accounts-source-idUSKBN1DZ0XN
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Schiff? Is this the partisan hack assclown that investigated but couldn't find anything wrong with Hilliary deleting Federal Records emails nor her disastrous negligence of Benghazi?
Originally posted by second:Quote:Hey 6ixStringJack. I haven't the will to convince you of anything. But keep on thinking you are right and I am wrong because your self-confidence is working out so very well for you and delivering material rewards to you every day, I'm sure.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yeah...
Don't think I didn't miss the lack of reply from Second. He almost never answers me directly, but always quotes me and posts a somewhat vaguely related story based off of a single sentence of one of my replies to completely deflect any point I was trying to make.
I had him dead to rights here, and he knows it.
Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, which is investigating the Trump campaign, said Mueller’s reported subpoena of Deutsche Bank “would be a very significant development”.
“If Russia laundered money through the Trump Organization, it would be far more compromising than any salacious video and could be used as leverage against Donald Trump and his associates and family,” Schiff said in a statement.
Deutsche Bank told Bloomberg in a statement that it always cooperated with investigating authorities.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/05/donald-trump-bank-records-hand
ed-over-robert-mueller
Mueller asked Deutsche Bank for data on accounts held by President Donald Trump and his family, a person close to the matter said on Tuesday.
Germany’s largest bank received a subpoena from Special Counsel Robert Mueller several weeks ago to provide information on certain money and credit transactions, the person said, adding key documents had been handed over in the meantime.
The German bank is one of the few major lenders that has lent large amounts to Trump in the past decade. A string of bankruptcies at his hotel and casino businesses during the 1990s made most of Wall Street wary of extending him credit.
A U.S. official with knowledge of Mueller’s probe said one reason for the subpoenas was to find out whether Deutsche Bank may have sold some of Trump’s mortgage or other loans to Russian state development bank VEB or other Russian banks that now are under U.S. and European Union sanctions.
Holding such debt, particularly if some of it was or is coming due, could potentially give Russian banks some leverage over Trump, especially if they are state-owned, said a second U.S. official familiar with Russian intelligence methods.
“One obvious question is why Trump and those around him expressed interest in improving relations with Russia as a top foreign policy priority, and whether or not any personal considerations played any part in that,” the second official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
There was no immediate response to the Deutsche Bank subpoena from Trump’s lawyers.
The subpoena was earlier reported by German daily Handelsblatt.
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-deutsche-bank/deutsche-bank-gets-
subpoena-from-mueller-on-trump-accounts-source-idUSKBN1DZ0XN
We should for sure believe everything he spouts, totally.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:When will Trump "Lock Her Up"? You're convinced she is a criminal, Trump is convinced, I'd be convinced, too, but only if Trump would lock her up. It was Trump's biggest campaign promise, bigger than punishing China for stealing jobs, bigger than Trump's promise to move all those Chinese jobs back to America. I also look forward to Trump's promise to stop Little Rocket-man, but I do hope Trump doesn't kill too many millions of South Koreans as collateral damage. I want to see Trump's promised Fire and Fury the Likes of Which the World has never seen before. The Countdown Clock keeps ticking on Trump's Promises and Impeachment and Re-election.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Schiff? Is this the partisan hack assclown that investigated but couldn't find anything wrong with Hilliary deleting Federal Records emails nor her disastrous negligence of Benghazi?
We should for sure believe everything he spouts, totally.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Schiff? Is this the partisan hack assclown that investigated but couldn't find anything wrong with Hilliary deleting Federal Records emails nor her disastrous negligence of Benghazi?
Originally posted by second:Quote:Hey 6ixStringJack. I haven't the will to convince you of anything. But keep on thinking you are right and I am wrong because your self-confidence is working out so very well for you and delivering material rewards to you every day, I'm sure.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yeah...
Don't think I didn't miss the lack of reply from Second. He almost never answers me directly, but always quotes me and posts a somewhat vaguely related story based off of a single sentence of one of my replies to completely deflect any point I was trying to make.
I had him dead to rights here, and he knows it.
Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, which is investigating the Trump campaign, said Mueller’s reported subpoena of Deutsche Bank “would be a very significant development”.
“If Russia laundered money through the Trump Organization, it would be far more compromising than any salacious video and could be used as leverage against Donald Trump and his associates and family,” Schiff said in a statement.
Deutsche Bank told Bloomberg in a statement that it always cooperated with investigating authorities.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/05/donald-trump-bank-records-hand
ed-over-robert-mueller
Mueller asked Deutsche Bank for data on accounts held by President Donald Trump and his family, a person close to the matter said on Tuesday.
Germany’s largest bank received a subpoena from Special Counsel Robert Mueller several weeks ago to provide information on certain money and credit transactions, the person said, adding key documents had been handed over in the meantime.
The German bank is one of the few major lenders that has lent large amounts to Trump in the past decade. A string of bankruptcies at his hotel and casino businesses during the 1990s made most of Wall Street wary of extending him credit.
A U.S. official with knowledge of Mueller’s probe said one reason for the subpoenas was to find out whether Deutsche Bank may have sold some of Trump’s mortgage or other loans to Russian state development bank VEB or other Russian banks that now are under U.S. and European Union sanctions.
Holding such debt, particularly if some of it was or is coming due, could potentially give Russian banks some leverage over Trump, especially if they are state-owned, said a second U.S. official familiar with Russian intelligence methods.
“One obvious question is why Trump and those around him expressed interest in improving relations with Russia as a top foreign policy priority, and whether or not any personal considerations played any part in that,” the second official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
There was no immediate response to the Deutsche Bank subpoena from Trump’s lawyers.
The subpoena was earlier reported by German daily Handelsblatt.
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-deutsche-bank/deutsche-bank-gets-
subpoena-from-mueller-on-trump-accounts-source-idUSKBN1DZ0XN
We should for sure believe everything he spouts, totally.
You should include the entire republican house and senate. They couldn't prove shit against the Clintons either. I guess they're pretty stupid or just plain incompetent huh.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Hey 6ixStringJack. I haven't the will to convince you of anything. But keep on thinking you are right and I am wrong because your self-confidence is working out so very well for you and delivering material rewards to you every day, I'm sure.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yeah...
Don't think I didn't miss the lack of reply from Second. He almost never answers me directly, but always quotes me and posts a somewhat vaguely related story based off of a single sentence of one of my replies to completely deflect any point I was trying to make.
I had him dead to rights here, and he knows it.
Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, which is investigating the Trump campaign, said Mueller’s reported subpoena of Deutsche Bank “would be a very significant development”.
“If Russia laundered money through the Trump Organization, it would be far more compromising than any salacious video and could be used as leverage against Donald Trump and his associates and family,” Schiff said in a statement.
Deutsche Bank told Bloomberg in a statement that it always cooperated with investigating authorities.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/05/donald-trump-bank-records-hand
ed-over-robert-mueller
Mueller asked Deutsche Bank for data on accounts held by President Donald Trump and his family, a person close to the matter said on Tuesday.
Germany’s largest bank received a subpoena from Special Counsel Robert Mueller several weeks ago to provide information on certain money and credit transactions, the person said, adding key documents had been handed over in the meantime.
The German bank is one of the few major lenders that has lent large amounts to Trump in the past decade. A string of bankruptcies at his hotel and casino businesses during the 1990s made most of Wall Street wary of extending him credit.
A U.S. official with knowledge of Mueller’s probe said one reason for the subpoenas was to find out whether Deutsche Bank may have sold some of Trump’s mortgage or other loans to Russian state development bank VEB or other Russian banks that now are under U.S. and European Union sanctions.
Holding such debt, particularly if some of it was or is coming due, could potentially give Russian banks some leverage over Trump, especially if they are state-owned, said a second U.S. official familiar with Russian intelligence methods.
“One obvious question is why Trump and those around him expressed interest in improving relations with Russia as a top foreign policy priority, and whether or not any personal considerations played any part in that,” the second official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
There was no immediate response to the Deutsche Bank subpoena from Trump’s lawyers.
The subpoena was earlier reported by German daily Handelsblatt.
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-deutsche-bank/deutsche-bank-gets-
subpoena-from-mueller-on-trump-accounts-source-idUSKBN1DZ0XN
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
See what I mean, JSF?
Not an argument there. Just another personal insult (this time about how much money he has compared to me), and then a link completely off topic).
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The link is NOT off topic because it is about Trump, not about you. Here is another link you won't understand, but understand this: the thread is NOT ABOUT YOU, 6ixStringJack. It is about Trump being fucked-upped-in-head crazy, even down to what he eats:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
See what I mean, JSF?
Not an argument there. Just another personal insult (this time about how much money he has compared to me), and then a link completely off topic).
Do Right, Be Right. :)
The president’s meal would clock in at 2,530 calories with 114g fat and 3530mg sodium. The USDA recommends 71-year-old, moderately active males consume 2,200 calories per day. Trump had already gone over his calorie needs for the day with just one meal. The sodium count of the McDonald’s meal also more than doubles the recommended intake of 1,500mg by the American Heart Association.
Trump’s affinity for the drive-thru is no surprise, but just how far his top aides would go to please his appetite could be considered shocking.
http://people.com/food/donald-trump-mcdonalds-order-calories-corey-lew
andowski-book/
Worse still is how central this diet is to letting Trump “be Trump,” to quote the book’s title. Adviser Sam Nunberg got purposely left behind at one McDonald’s because his “special-order burger” was taking too long for the president. “Leave him,” Trump supposedly ordered. “Let’s go.” Lewandowski and Bossie add that orchestrating Trump’s meals was literally “as important as any other aspect of his march to the presidency.” Ensuring that a bag of hot fast food was waiting for Trump on the plane was therefore an all-hands-on-deck situation.
Regardless of Trump’s politics, every new detail the public learns about his diet is more cause for concern. Not only does he get a day-and-a-quarter’s worth of calories in one McDonald’s meal, but he’s 71 years old, is moody and chronically sleep-deprived, and also believes the human body is “like a battery” that comes with “a finite amount of energy,” which exercise “depletes.” Processed food doesn’t do him favors on any of these fronts.
www.grubstreet.com/2017/12/trumps-fast-food-diet-gets-even-more-unsett
ling.html
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Yes, I had noticed that. I was impressed with the devoting a sentence and a half before launching.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Hey 6ixStringJack. I haven't the will to convince you of anything. But keep on thinking you are right and I am wrong because your self-confidence is working out so very well for you and delivering material rewards to you every day, I'm sure.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yeah...
Don't think I didn't miss the lack of reply from Second. He almost never answers me directly, but always quotes me and posts a somewhat vaguely related story based off of a single sentence of one of my replies to completely deflect any point I was trying to make.
I had him dead to rights here, and he knows it.
Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, which is investigating the Trump campaign, said Mueller’s reported subpoena of Deutsche Bank “would be a very significant development”.
“If Russia laundered money through the Trump Organization, it would be far more compromising than any salacious video and could be used as leverage against Donald Trump and his associates and family,” Schiff said in a statement.
Deutsche Bank told Bloomberg in a statement that it always cooperated with investigating authorities.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/05/donald-trump-bank-records-hand
ed-over-robert-mueller
Mueller asked Deutsche Bank for data on accounts held by President Donald Trump and his family, a person close to the matter said on Tuesday.
Germany’s largest bank received a subpoena from Special Counsel Robert Mueller several weeks ago to provide information on certain money and credit transactions, the person said, adding key documents had been handed over in the meantime.
The German bank is one of the few major lenders that has lent large amounts to Trump in the past decade. A string of bankruptcies at his hotel and casino businesses during the 1990s made most of Wall Street wary of extending him credit.
A U.S. official with knowledge of Mueller’s probe said one reason for the subpoenas was to find out whether Deutsche Bank may have sold some of Trump’s mortgage or other loans to Russian state development bank VEB or other Russian banks that now are under U.S. and European Union sanctions.
Holding such debt, particularly if some of it was or is coming due, could potentially give Russian banks some leverage over Trump, especially if they are state-owned, said a second U.S. official familiar with Russian intelligence methods.
“One obvious question is why Trump and those around him expressed interest in improving relations with Russia as a top foreign policy priority, and whether or not any personal considerations played any part in that,” the second official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
There was no immediate response to the Deutsche Bank subpoena from Trump’s lawyers.
The subpoena was earlier reported by German daily Handelsblatt.
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-deutsche-bank/deutsche-bank-gets-
subpoena-from-mueller-on-trump-accounts-source-idUSKBN1DZ0XN
See what I mean, JSF?
Not an argument there. Just another personal insult (this time about how much money he has compared to me), and then a link completely off topic).
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
LOL... yeah. Looks like he eeked another one in there too.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Tick Tock...
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
John McCain to Trump: Lay off the 'fake news' claims
Senator John McCain again called out President Trump for his anti-media rhetoric.
In a tweet Wednesday afternoon, McCain shared a new report from the Committee to Protect Journalists that says the number of journalists imprisoned around the world has reached 262, a new record.
The total includes 21 reporters being held on "false news" charges.
The president "must understand his harmful rhetoric only empowers repressive regimes to jail reporters & silence the truth," McCain wrote.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/john-mccain-to-trump-lay-off-t
he-fake-news-claims/ar-BBGIe0F?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I don't see anything strange about that.
Doesn't our PotUS emulate them Repressive guys?
... as well as them Groper guys?
... oooOO}{OOooo ...
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Oonjerah:
I don't see anything strange about that.
Doesn't our PotUS emulate them Repressive guys?
... as well as them Groper guys?
... oooOO}{OOooo ...
Yes and so much more. One classless move after another.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Only 2,588 days remaining on the Impeachment Clock.
.,Pretty exciting now.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The scariest part of Trump's first year as president isn't how abnormal he is, it's how Trump makes extreme things look normal by comparison.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Federal prosecutors reportedly sought bank records related to Jared Kushner's family business
Federal prosecutors have reportedly sought bank records related to White House senior adviser Jared Kushner's family business. It's not clear whether there is any connection between that development and special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation.
http://www.businessinsider.com/federal-prosecutors-subpoena-deutsche-b
ank-jared-kushner-records-2017-12
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What special counsel has offered publicly signals long year ahead in Russia probe
In Trump's interview with The New York Times, the president said he thinks Mueller is "going to be fair" to him.
A spokesman for Mueller declined to comment for this article.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/special-counsel-offered-publicly-signal
s-long-year-ahead/story?id=52049373
T 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Former Watergate prosecutor: 'Conspiracy,' not collusion, is main issue in Russia investigation
Nick Ackerman, a former Watergate prosecutor, said Saturday that the big issue in special counsel Robert Mueller investigation is not whether the Trump campaign coordinated with Russia, but whether it conspired to steal emails from prominent figures in the Democratic Party.
"I think the big enchilada here is the conspiracy to break into the Democratic National Committee in violation of the federal computer crime law and to use those emails to help Donald Trump get elected," Ackerman said on MSNBC.
"All of that is motive as to why Donald Trump and others were endeavoring to obstruct the investigation, and why Donald Trump told [former FBI Director] James Comey to let the investigation on [former national security adviser Michael] Flynn go," he added. "All of this is going to come together in 2018."
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/former-watergate-prosecutor-con
spiracy-not-collusion-is-main-issue-in-russia-investigation/ar-BBHwKHN?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=BHEA000
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
All I have to say is if somehow Trump was directly involved in making those Clinton/DNC emails public, don't forget everything that was in them when Hillary inevitably runs again.
Kill her bid in the Primary and I might even vote Democrat in the General depending on how the next 3 years go.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
How the FBI Russia investigation really began: Not a dossier, but 'firsthand information'
The FBI opened its investigation long before the election, not on the basis of the dossier or any other opposition research. The investigation began because a member of Trump’s own campaign blabbed to foreign officials that the Trump campaign had knowledge about Russia’s role in stealing information from Democratic officials.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/30/1728645/-How-the-FBI-Russi
a-investigation-really-began-Not-a-dossier-but-firsthand-information
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Russia is a big place. Condemning somebody based singularly off of their national origin is a bit racist, don'tcha think?
I think whoever got those leaked emails out to the public is a hero. Particularly the ones showing collusion between the DNC and the MSM.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump breaks with Bannon over his reported criticism of the president and his family
The president’s public denunciation of Bannon came only after a report early Wednesday, based on excerpts from a forthcoming book, that quoted Bannon condemning as “treasonous” a June 2016 meeting in which Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, met with Kremlin-linked Russians to get “dirt” on Hillary Clinton.
“Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad ... and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately,” Bannon reportedly said.
His verdict on the meeting in Trump Tower — an event now at the center of a special counsel’s criminal investigation of Russian election meddling and potential Trump campaign complicity — was taken from a book to be released next week and obtained before publication by the Guardian newspaper. Bannon’s reported comment is an especially damning charge, undercutting Trump’s claim that the Russia story is a Democratic hoax.
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-bannon-20180103-story.
html
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Prevezon’s lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, arranged the meeting with Trump Jr. last year. She had been pushing for a long time to get something done about the Prevezon case. So it's very possible that she went into that meeting with Trump Jr essentially asking for help, in return for which she would give the Trump campaign dirt on Hillary and the DNC.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
The president’s public denunciation of Bannon came only after a report early Wednesday, based on excerpts from a forthcoming book, that quoted Bannon condemning as “treasonous” a June 2016 meeting in which Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, met with Kremlin-linked Russians to get “dirt” on Hillary Clinton.
“Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad ... and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately,” Bannon reportedly said.
Several months after Trump takes office, the Prevezon case is dismissed. So what happened? The U.S. attorney was carefully preparing a case against Prevezon Holdings. They were all set to go forward, and then suddenly the case was settled. Prevezon's own lawyers were kind of shocked. We know they paid something like $6 million, which is a fraction of what the lawsuit was about. So they were extremely happy about it.
Do we have any evidence that Trump was involved in any way with Prevezon? We know is that Preet Bharara, the attorney in charge of the case, was fired by Trump in early March, and shortly thereafter the Prevezon case was dropped. They had been ready to prosecute, witnesses were flown in, it was all set to go, and it was settled rather unexpectedly. So I think this is a case that hasn't really entered the public consciousness yet. But I'm sure that special counsel Robert Mueller's team is looking at it.
www.vox.com/2017/7/18/15983910/donald-trump-russia-putin-fbi-collusion
-fusion-gps
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:So why did it take the investigative team a year to finally get around to questioning the person who supposedly "started" the investigation in the first place? It's a pretty thin story, and just more starting-line-moving from the anti-Trump faction as they try to justify a really stupid (and probably criminal) action.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
How the FBI Russia investigation really began: Not a dossier, but 'firsthand information'
The FBI opened its investigation long before the election, not on the basis of the dossier or any other opposition research. The investigation began because a member of Trump’s own campaign blabbed to foreign officials that the Trump campaign had knowledge about Russia’s role in stealing information from Democratic officials.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/30/1728645/-How-the-FBI-Russi
a-investigation-really-began-Not-a-dossier-but-firsthand-information
However, if the FISA court was at all involved... and it should have been .... the REAL story is still the affidavit and evidence therein justifying the issuance of a FISA warrant. It doesn't matter what anyone leaks to the press, the affidavit is a matter of written record.
Yanno, there are MANY reasons to not like Trump, but being a Russian stooge isn't one of them.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey.... so is Bannon a good guy now?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:If "good" means effective, energetic, and competent. Bannon, who became chief executive of Trump’s team in mid-August 2016, called it “the broke-dick campaign.” Almost immediately, he saw that it was hampered by an even deeper structural flaw: The candidate who billed himself as a billionaire — ten times over — refused to invest his own money in it. Bannon told Kushner that, after the first debate in September, they would need another $50 million to cover them until Election Day.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Hey.... so is Bannon a good guy now?
“No way we’ll get 50 million unless we can guarantee him victory,” said a clear-eyed Kushner.
“Twenty-five million?” prodded Bannon.
“If we can say victory is more than likely.”
In the end, the best Trump would do is to loan the campaign $10 million, provided he got it back as soon as they could raise other money. Steve Mnuchin, the campaign’s finance chairman, came to collect the loan with the wire instructions ready to go so Trump couldn’t conveniently forget to send the money.
On Election Day there was, in the space of little more than an hour, in Steve Bannon’s not unamused observation, a befuddled Trump morphing into a disbelieving Trump and then into a horrified Trump. But still to come was the final transformation: Suddenly, Donald Trump became a man who believed that he deserved to be, and was wholly capable of being, the president of the United States.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fu
ry-book-donald-trump.html
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey.... so is Bannon a good guy now?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yanno, there are MANY reasons to not like Trump, but being a Russian stooge isn't one of them.
That dependz on how you define stooge in Russia.
Here in America, a stooj in this context meanz a cheap brainless dispozable thug; an employee uv a criminal; a puppet. Elliot Ness: "We can keep arresting Blambino'z dime-a-dozen stoojez till Hell freezez over and never get near him. We need to work our way up the food chain."
Striktly speeking, youre rite. Altho Trump iz brainless and a puppet uv Putin, he wuznt cheap and he iznt at the bottom uv the food chain. He'z been taking a hefty persentaj in the money laundering operation for decadez.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Unlike everybody else at the top of Trump's campaign, Bannon believed Trump was going to win and Bannon made it happen. From the moment of victory, the Trump administration became a looking-glass presidency: Every inverse assumption about how to assemble and run a White House was enacted and compounded, many times over. The decisions that Trump and his top advisers made in those first few months — from the slapdash transition to the disarray in the West Wing — set the stage for the chaos and dysfunction that have persisted throughout his first year in office. This was a real-life version of Mel Brooks’s The Producers, where the mistaken outcome trusted by everyone, except for Bannon, in Trump’s inner circle — that they would lose the election — wound up exposing them for who they really were.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Hey.... so is Bannon a good guy now?
Bannon has not hired a lawyer. He knows he has no reason to worry about what Robert Mueller finds on him.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So Bannon is a good guy now, right?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:So why did it take the investigative team a year to finally get around to questioning the person who supposedly "started" the investigation in the first place? It's a pretty thin story, and just more starting-line-moving from the anti-Trump faction as they try to justify a really stupid (and probably criminal) action.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
How the FBI Russia investigation really began: Not a dossier, but 'firsthand information'
The FBI opened its investigation long before the election, not on the basis of the dossier or any other opposition research. The investigation began because a member of Trump’s own campaign blabbed to foreign officials that the Trump campaign had knowledge about Russia’s role in stealing information from Democratic officials.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/30/1728645/-How-the-FBI-Russi
a-investigation-really-began-Not-a-dossier-but-firsthand-information
Yanno, there are MANY reasons to not like Trump, but being a Russian stooge isn't one of them.
So you know when they first spoke with him, enlighten us. Tell the rest of us what the timeline was. And no one is moving the goal line. Facts are coming out is all, and your past posts are being proven to be bullshit, subterfuge.
And talk about moving the line. Trump being a Russian stooge according to you is not so bad. This after all the denials of there being any russian contacts. None, zero....
Tick tock, tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Steve Bannon in new book: Russia probe's focus is money-laundering
Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon said he believes the special counsel investigation on Russia is focusing on money laundering and called a Trump Tower meeting between the Trump campaign and a Russian lawyer "treasonous."
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2018/01/03/Steve-Bannon-in-new-book-Ru
ssia-probes-focus-is-money-laundering/6461515002655/
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There is much the Senate can do to Trump, far short of impeachment, to kick him in his face.
Cory Gardner just showed how Senate Republicans could check Trump if they wanted to.
www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/1/4/16849584/cory-gardner-marijua
na
When Gardner threatens to hold up DOJ nominations, he’s not saying he will hold up nominees who disagree with him about marijuana policy. He’s saying he will hold up everyone regardless of the merits, in order to try to get his way on marijuana policy.
That’s standard-issue behavior for a US senator. And by the same token, if Flake or Corker or anyone else wants to shift Trump’s behavior on any topic, this is the way to do it. You don’t need to wake up one morning and become a liberal. But you also don’t need to write a book or give a speech or deliver a grandstanding interview. What you need to do is use your concrete powers of office to hold up things that other people care about until you get your way on an issue that you care about.
Republicans could, if they wanted to, demand that Trump stop mixing his business interests with politics. Or stop employing his unqualified son-in-law as a top White House aide. Or stop lying relentlessly about election fraud. Or whatever of a dozen other things he does that aren’t related to the main elements of conservative ideology. But they keep choosing on a daily basis not to do so, engaging in a form of “ideological collusion” that threatens the stability of American institutions.
Gardner’s actions today are a reminder that the GOP legislative caucus hasn’t forgotten how to use its powers of office — it’s simply decided not to.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump’s behavior is consistent with two diametrically opposite conclusions. It’s consistent with the possibility that Trump colluded with Russia in some way and is desperate to cover it up. But it’s also consistent with the possibility that Trump is entirely innocent. A person with Trump’s volcanic temper and bottomless feelings of grievance would probably react exactly the way he has if he had done nothing wrong.
So far, all the evidence we’ve seen publicly has come tantalizingly close to obstruction of justice, but has never quite gotten there. But even if it doesn’t, the precise legal definitions of obstruction apply only in a courtroom, not in an impeachment trial. The kinds of things Trump has done are more than enough to constitute a “high crime” if enough members of Congress think it does. At the moment, Republicans prefer keeping Trump in office. But if they ever decide he’s too big an albatross and they’d rather deal with President Pence, Mueller is almost certain to give them enough to make a case with.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I guess.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I guess money-laundering allegations could hurt Trump more than Russia-gate
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I guess.
https://qz.com/1172800
Collusion and obstruction of justice are tricky to prove. Collusion is not even a federal crime, while charging someone with obstruction of justice demands that you prove a person’s criminal intent. Both rely on accounts of incidents reported by people with agendas.
With plain old money laundering, however, the crime is impossible to deny or overlook — it’s all there for you on paper. As sitting president, Trump almost certainly wouldn’t be criminally indicted if such a scheme were demonstrated, but could members of Congress really bring themselves to support a fraudster?
This week, three statements added fuel to speculation that Trump’s financial history may be the most sensitive thing unearthed by investigations into his presidential campaign: More at https://qz.com/1172800
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Trump’s behavior is consistent with two diametrically opposite conclusions. It’s consistent with the possibility that Trump colluded with Russia in some way and is desperate to cover it up. But it’s also consistent with the possibility that Trump is entirely innocent. A person with Trump’s volcanic temper and bottomless feelings of grievance would probably react exactly the way he has if he had done nothing wrong.
So far, all the evidence we’ve seen publicly has come tantalizingly close to obstruction of justice, but has never quite gotten there. But even if it doesn’t, the precise legal definitions of obstruction apply only in a courtroom, not in an impeachment trial. The kinds of things Trump has done are more than enough to constitute a “high crime” if enough members of Congress think it does. At the moment, Republicans prefer keeping Trump in office. But if they ever decide he’s too big an albatross and they’d rather deal with President Pence, Mueller is almost certain to give them enough to make a case with.
It's called due process. Which is why Mueller needs to see this through.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
When all is said and done, Bannon may testify honestly as he comes to realize that he needs Trump to be exposed as a traitor. He needs this in order to salvage his reputation amongst the alt right. If Bannon can show he turned on Trump because Trump betrayed his country, then he can show just cause for doing so.
T
Bannon hires lawyer as he prepares for Russia-related congressional testimony
Former White House strategist Stephen K. Bannon has hired prominent Washington attorney William Burck to represent him as he prepares to testify to the House Intelligence Committee about his role in Donald Trump's presidential campaign, according to a person familiar with the arrangement.
Bannon had previously insisted that he did not need a lawyer because he had not been drawn into the multiple investigations into whether Trump's team coordinated with Russia during the 2016 campaign. But in recent weeks, the House intelligence panel made a request that Bannon testify before the committee.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bannon-hires-lawyer-as-he-prep
ares-for-russia-related-congressional-testimony/ar-AAuyRrB?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:get a clue. Due Process is for courtrooms, not Congress. Congress is Deliberative Body, meaning "waiting for bribes before deciding"
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Trump’s behavior is consistent with two diametrically opposite conclusions. It’s consistent with the possibility that Trump colluded with Russia in some way and is desperate to cover it up. But it’s also consistent with the possibility that Trump is entirely innocent. A person with Trump’s volcanic temper and bottomless feelings of grievance would probably react exactly the way he has if he had done nothing wrong.
So far, all the evidence we’ve seen publicly has come tantalizingly close to obstruction of justice, but has never quite gotten there. But even if it doesn’t, the precise legal definitions of obstruction apply only in a courtroom, not in an impeachment trial. The kinds of things Trump has done are more than enough to constitute a “high crime” if enough members of Congress think it does. At the moment, Republicans prefer keeping Trump in office. But if they ever decide he’s too big an albatross and they’d rather deal with President Pence, Mueller is almost certain to give them enough to make a case with.
It's called due process. Which is why Mueller needs to see this through.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Only 2,563 days remaining on the Impeachment Clock.
Pretty exciting now.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Lewandowski says he will testify this week in House Russia probe
Corey Lewandowski, President Trump’s former campaign manager, said in an interview broadcast Sunday that he will give testimony this week to a House committee probing Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2018/01/14/lewandowsk
i-says-he-will-testify-this-week-in-house-russia-probe/?utm_term=.51be45f30c89
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Former Trump advisor Bannon is expected to testify before a House committee on Tuesday
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/12/steve-bannon-expected-to-testify-befor
e-house-intelligence-committee-nbc-news.html
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Maybe this will be the one T. Good luck!
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Bannon Is Subpoenaed in Mueller’s Russia Investigation
The move marked the first time Mr. Mueller is known to have used a grand jury subpoena to seek information from a member of Mr. Trump’s inner circle. The special counsel’s office has used subpoenas before to seek information on Mr. Trump’s associates and their possible ties to Russia or other foreign governments.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bannon-is-subpoenaed-in-muelle
r’s-russia-investigation/ar-AAuMnx6?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
GOP lawmaker: Bannon issue is whether executive privilege can be invoked for transition
Florida Rep. Tom Rooney, a senior Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday that Steve Bannon's testimony is running into problems over whether he can invoke executive privilege for events that occurred during the transition.
A source familiar with the matter said Bannon was issued subpoena by House committee after refusing to disclose information from the time period of the transition and White House
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gop-lawmaker-bannon-issue-is-w
hether-executive-privilege-can-be-invoked-for-transition/ar-AAuMSRv?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Why does there need to be a subpoena to get Bannon to testify? I thought all the reports said that he couldn't wait to testify.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Only 2,660 days remaining on the Impeachment Clock.
Quote:Testifying about nonexistent items such as collusion are not the issue.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Why does there need to be a subpoena to get Bannon to testify? I thought all the reports said that he couldn't wait to testify.)
But pertaining to the fishing expedition from Mueller, about topics Banner is not authorized to discuss, he cannot discuss what he is expressly forbidden to discuss, or else he would be violating Federal Law. Just the sort of trap Mueller is slaving to create - to get innocent people to violate the myriad of tricky laws within the structure of Mueller's fishing expedition.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Steve Bannon Clashes in Russia Investigation With Congress During 'Total Free-for-All'
Congress issued a new subpoena against former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon Tuesday after he refused to answer questions during testimony in the Russia probe about his time in the West Wing and the transition period after the 2016 election.
Bannon sat for 10 hours with the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill Tuesday as he faced questions for the investigation into whether the Trump campaign aided Russia’s efforts to meddle in the election.
After the former White House official and ex-Breitbart News chief stonewalled Congress during the interview, the committee issued a subpoena seeking documents and more testimony, according to Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX) who heads the committee’s probe.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/steve-bannon-clashes-russia-investigation-1
13539480.html?.tsrc=jtc_news_index
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Bannon's attorneys related questions to White House in real time
Steve Bannon's attorney relayed questions, in real time, to the White House during a House Intelligence Committee interview of the former Trump chief strategist. That's according to people familiar with the closed-door session who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
During the day-long interview Tuesday, Bannon's attorney Bill Burck was asking the White House counsel's office by phone whether his client could answer the questions. He was told by that office not to discuss his work on the transition or in the White House.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bannons-attorneys-related-questions-to-wh
ite-house-in-real-time-ap/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
White House acknowledges telling Bannon not to answer questions in Russia probe
WASHINGTON — The White House acknowledged Wednesday that it instructed former chief strategist Steve Bannon not to answer questions posed by the House Intelligence Committee as part of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/01/17/white-house-ac
knowledges-telling-bannon-not-answer-questions-russia-probe/1041494001/
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It's interesting what Gowdy says about Bannon. I though he and Trump couldn't wait to testify. You know, to set the record straight. The problem Bannon and Trump now face is that they can't lie, or spin. If they do they go to jail. It's time to put up or shut up. Well, they shut up.
Seems to me what they claimed was fake news must have been true after all. Otherwise they would testify repeating their version of the facts. No contacts with Russia. The same set of facts they've been selling to morons like Jack, and trolls like sig and 1kiki.
It's simple, did this happen or not. Now's Bannon's chance to say it didn't. Why won't he? And Why is Trumps White House telling him to clam up?
I would remind these same assholes that Clinton testified for 12 hours about Benghazi. And, she answered the questions. Still these same morons and trolls attacked her. Well, how about you treat Trump and Bannon with that same sense of justice. The rest of us know that isn't going to happen because with you it never is about the facts. Come on rappy, JSF, Jack and our other trolls. Step up to the plate.
Get ready Jeff Sessions, your turn is fast approaching. It's going to be astounding to hear Sessions, Trump appointed head of the DOJ, plead the fifth.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
We'll see, buddy.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
RE the Gowdy interview - iznt there a contempt uv congress charj? They are being treated like foolz with no penalty.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Only 2,658 days left on the Impeachment Clock.
How exciting.
Looks like might be many less days on the Mueller in Prison Clock.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Just in case anybody missed T's video when he posted it on this thread at 10:14 AM, he kindly deleted that post and then reposted the video to the very same thread for you to watch at 1:15PM.
Thanks for that buddy. I thought it might get lost under the pile of Zero posts that happened in between.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to
WASHINGTON — President Trump ordered the firing last June of Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel overseeing the Russia investigation, according to four people told of the matter, but ultimately backed down after the White House counsel threatened to resign rather than carry out the directive.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-ordered-mueller-fired-bu
t-backed-off-when-white-house-counsel-threatened-to-quit/ar-AAvbhvl?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Trump has denied he tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June last year. But the reports have given extra ballast to accusations of obstruction of justice over the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to
WASHINGTON — President Trump ordered the firing last June of Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel overseeing the Russia investigation, according to four people told of the matter, but ultimately backed down after the White House counsel threatened to resign rather than carry out the directive.
The fact that this took place just a month after he ousted FBI director James Comey, “shows that the pattern of obstruction is a strong case because this is yet another indicator of his intent to derail the investigation,” Georgetown law professor Carrie Cordero argued on the Brookings Institute’s Lawfare podcast yesterday (Jan. 26).
The main events known to the public that make up the argument for obstruction took place between January and July 2017. On July 15, Trump hired specialist white-collar crime lawyer Ty Cobb, who reportedly implemented a strategy of full cooperation with the FBI investigation. Since then, Trump’s most controversial actions towards the probe seem to have been curbed. Here’s a timeline of the biggest events during that six-month period at https://qz.com/1190106
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Trump has denied he tried to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June last year. But the reports have given extra ballast to accusations of obstruction of justice over the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to
WASHINGTON — President Trump ordered the firing last June of Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel overseeing the Russia investigation, according to four people told of the matter, but ultimately backed down after the White House counsel threatened to resign rather than carry out the directive.
The fact that this took place just a month after he ousted FBI director James Comey, “shows that the pattern of obstruction is a strong case because this is yet another indicator of his intent to derail the investigation,” Georgetown law professor Carrie Cordero argued on the Brookings Institute’s Lawfare podcast yesterday (Jan. 26).
The main events known to the public that make up the argument for obstruction took place between January and July 2017. On July 15, Trump hired specialist white-collar crime lawyer Ty Cobb, who reportedly implemented a strategy of full cooperation with the FBI investigation. Since then, Trump’s most controversial actions towards the probe seem to have been curbed. Here’s a timeline of the biggest events during that six-month period at https://qz.com/1190106]
Still, it is a very high bar needed before Mueller will act. Trump is President and you see how the republicans are. Still, after the elections if the republicans lose big, the democrats may have the votes to impeach.
The other thing about that is, except for the judges, 95% of what Trump has done can be reversed, fixed. Like the clean water act.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:So then he deleted the 1:55 and reposted at 3:38. WTF?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Just in case anybody missed T's video when he posted it on this thread at 10:14 AM, he kindly deleted that post and then reposted the video to the very same thread for you to watch at 1:15PM.
Thanks for that buddy. I thought it might get lost under the pile of Zero posts that happened in between.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Only 2,651 days left on the Impeachment Clock.
How exciting.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Meanwile, the Treazon Scale for Republican Congressmen & Senatorz haz maxed out and been replased by an improvized balans beam arranjement thats good to a million poundz.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Didn't they reset the Dommsday Clock?
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Just in case anybody missed T's video when he posted it on this thread at 10:14 AM, he kindly deleted that post and then reposted the video to the very same thread for you to watch at 1:15PM.
Thanks for that buddy. I thought it might get lost under the pile of Zero posts that happened in between.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Uh oh!!! The rats are leaving the sinking ship?
Gurgle, Gurgle!!!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Only 2,651 days left on the Impeachment Clock.
How exciting.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:What are you on about?
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Uh oh!!! The rats are leaving the sinking ship?
Gurgle, Gurgle!!!
SGGQuote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Only 2,651 days left on the Impeachment Clock.
How exciting.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I think its too late for most uv them.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:What are you on about?
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Uh oh!!! The rats are leaving the sinking ship?
Gurgle, Gurgle!!!
SGGQuote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Only 2,651 days left on the Impeachment Clock.
How exciting.
I'm honestly wondering the same thing.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
Meanwile, the Treazon Scale for Republican Congressmen & Senatorz haz maxed out and been replased by an improvized balans beam arranjement thats good to a million poundz.
Treason is right. It's very sad to watch this happen. Don't know if they can recover the republican brand after this.
Sad, its not America first with them, it's Russia first.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump turns Russia frustration to Rosenstein
Months after his reported effort to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, President Donald Trump is still fuming over the Russia investigation and has Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in his crosshairs.
The President has been venting about Rosenstein -- who oversees Mueller and the special counsel investigation -- in recent weeks, according to four sources familiar with the situation. At times, Trump even gripes about wanting Rosenstein removed, two of those sources said. One source said the President makes comments like "let's fire him, let's get rid of him" before his advisers convince him it's an ill-fated idea.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-turns-russia-frustration
-to-rosenstein/ar-BBIhUJk?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Two left, Trump and Pence
Tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
lol
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
To stay in power, the GOP will let the Russians interfere
The Feb. 7 editorial “Speak up, Mr. Speaker” ended with this paragraph: “As always, it’s difficult — but important — to remember what is at stake. A foreign power interfered with an American election. Rather than help defend the country against future interference, the president is slandering the nation’s law enforcement and intelligent agencies. Mr. Ryan can abet the slander, or he can help defend the country.” It is most important to remember that this “foreign power” is a very hostile one; namely, Russia under Vladimir Putin. Unfortunately, President Trump is clearly Mr. Putin’s puppet, gushing over him whenever he gets the opportunity. And House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) is enabling the Russian puppet master. Mr. Ryan’s unpatriotic actions (turning a blind eye to Mr. Putin) and his cowardly subservience to Mr.?Trump make him unworthy to serve as speaker.
Why haven’t the Republicans done anything to prevent Russian interference in the 2018 midterm elections? The answer is simple: Republicans know they are in trouble, and they want Russia to interfere so that they can keep their majorities in both houses.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/to-stay-in-power-the-gop-will-
let-the-russians-interfere/2018/02/11/d7c35a82-0dcc-11e8-998c-96deb18cca19_story.html?utm_term=.905de6dd98bb
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:That's a lot of letters for "bump"
Originally posted by THGRRI:
To stay in power, the GOP will let the Russians interfere
The Feb. 7 editorial “Speak up, Mr. Speaker” ended with this paragraph: “As always, it’s difficult — but important — to remember what is at stake. A foreign power interfered with an American election. Rather than help defend the country against future interference, the president is slandering the nation’s law enforcement and intelligent agencies. Mr. Ryan can abet the slander, or he can help defend the country.” It is most important to remember that this “foreign power” is a very hostile one; namely, Russia under Vladimir Putin. Unfortunately, President Trump is clearly Mr. Putin’s puppet, gushing over him whenever he gets the opportunity. And House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) is enabling the Russian puppet master. Mr. Ryan’s unpatriotic actions (turning a blind eye to Mr. Putin) and his cowardly subservience to Mr.?Trump make him unworthy to serve as speaker.
Why haven’t the Republicans done anything to prevent Russian interference in the 2018 midterm elections? The answer is simple: Republicans know they are in trouble, and they want Russia to interfere so that they can keep their majorities in both houses.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/to-stay-in-power-the-gop-will-
let-the-russians-interfere/2018/02/11/d7c35a82-0dcc-11e8-998c-96deb18cca19_story.html?utm_term=.905de6dd98bb
T
Only 2,634 days left on the Impeachment Clock.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Only 2,634 days left on the Impeachment Clock.
Trump budget funds Mueller probe through fiscal 2019
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-budget-funds-mueller-pro
be-through-fiscal-2019/ar-BBJ31Hy?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp
Personally, I hope Mueller waits until the 2018 elections. I want more democrats in office when he makes his move. And it looks like there are going to be quite a few elected.
Tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Only 266 days 5hrs. and 26 minutes until Trump gets impeached.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The problem iz how much damaj Putin can do at any time. He iz now directing Trump to goof up a major military base in Qatar.
The sooner Meuller indites Trump the better. The stoopid GoPs are toast wether its befor the election or after. If they dont impeach him wen he iz indited, the inditement will still be there wen the Demz take over. The only differens will be that the GoPs will be blacker toast.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
The problem iz how much damaj Putin can do at any time. He iz now directing Trump to goof up a major military base in Qatar.
The sooner Meuller indites Trump the better. The stoopid GoPs are toast wether its befor the election or after. If they dont impeach him wen he iz indited, the inditement will still be there wen the Demz take over. The only differens will be that the GoPs will be blacker toast.
You may be right. And it's looking like there's no way he won't be impeached if the dems win the way it's stacking up. Fingers crossed, toes and nuts as well.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Why do I suspect that this prediction will not be preserved in kpo's thread?
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Only 266 days 5hrs. and 26 minutes until Trump gets impeached.
T
From 12 February.
October 12 would be 242 days, so 266 days would be 5 November when Trump is Impeached, according to T, at 10pm Pacific Time Zone.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Crossed nuts!?
I hate it wen that happenz!
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Why do I suspect that this prediction will not be preserved in kpo's thread?
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Only 266 days 5hrs. and 26 minutes until Trump gets impeached.
T
From 12 February.
October 12 would be 242 days, so 266 days would be 5 November when Trump is Impeached, according to T, at 10pm Pacific Time Zone.
Oh. He's being cute. It's a Guy Fawke's reference.
He's LARPing V For Vendetta now.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Wow! V for Vendetta!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Why do I suspect that this prediction will not be preserved in kpo's thread?
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Only 266 days 5hrs. and 26 minutes until Trump gets impeached.
T
From 12 February.
October 12 would be 242 days, so 266 days would be 5 November when Trump is Impeached, according to T, at 10pm Pacific Time Zone.
Oh. He's being cute. It's a Guy Fawke's reference.
He's LARPing V For Vendetta now.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:From the guy who claims to never use or understand acronyms....
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:Oh. He's being cute. It's a Guy Fawke's reference.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Why do I suspect that this prediction will not be preserved in kpo's thread?
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Only 266 days 5hrs. and 26 minutes until Trump gets impeached.
T
From 12 February.
October 12 would be 242 days, so 266 days would be 5 November when Trump is Impeached, according to T, at 10pm Pacific Time Zone.
He's LARPing V For Vendetta now.
Long Range Armed Reconnaissance Patrols/Patrolling?
Or something else?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
Crossed nuts!?
I hate it wen that happenz!
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:From the guy who claims to never use or understand acronyms....
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:Oh. He's being cute. It's a Guy Fawke's reference.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Why do I suspect that this prediction will not be preserved in kpo's thread?
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Only 266 days 5hrs. and 26 minutes until Trump gets impeached.
T
From 12 February.
October 12 would be 242 days, so 266 days would be 5 November when Trump is Impeached, according to T, at 10pm Pacific Time Zone.
He's LARPing V For Vendetta now.
Long Range Armed Reconnaissance Patrols/Patrolling?
Or something else?
Live Action Role Playing. They had a whole American Dad episode about it.
Think of any idiot wearing a mask and calling themselves Antifa and burning trash cans and that's LARPing.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Those words put together sound like a concept which defines NSFW, Sexual harassment, racism, and everything non-PC.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
]From the guy who claims to never use or understand acronyms....
Long Range Armed Reconnaissance Patrols/Patrolling?
Or something else?
Live Action Role Playing. They had a whole American Dad episode about it.
Think of any idiot wearing a mask and calling themselves Antifa and burning trash cans and that's LARPing.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Rick Gates: Top Donald Trump Campaign Aide Will ‘Flip,’ Robert Mueller Russia Probe Closing In, Report Says.
Rick Gates, a top aide to Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential election campaign and longtime business partner of Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, is ready to strike a plea deal with Russia investigation Special Counsel Robert Mueller, CNN reported on Thursday afternoon. The news appears to be a potential bombshell because a plea agreement likely indicates that Gates is ready to “flip” and provide Mueller with potentially damaging information against Trump, the report said.
https://www.inquisitr.com/4788392/donald-trump-russia-robert-mueller-r
ick-gates/
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME