REEQUEEN'S BLOG

ReeQueen

Query
Friday, December 24, 2004

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

COMMENTS

Monday, December 27, 2004 11:17 PM

REEQUEEN


No, don't blame yourself. My humour alert sensor is, well....let's just say certain members of my family got off the train at Whoville.

And any chance to list the Names of Marmots is a good time. For me.

Monday, December 27, 2004 10:59 PM

JACKSKELLINGTON10


I know they are not REALLY extinct. That was just a failed attempt at humor.

I know.....think before you type.....I need to install a filter between my brain and my fingers.

Monday, December 27, 2004 7:08 AM

REEQUEEN


Woodchucks are not extinct. They're marmots, groundhogs, prairie dogs - depending on location - fat little things with big teeth and floppy bellies.

Monday, December 27, 2004 4:31 AM

JACKSKELLINGTON10


There are no more woodchucks. They are extinct

Sunday, December 26, 2004 7:38 AM

CHOSEN1


Much like TheGreyJedi, my standard answer has always been:
A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

Sunday, December 26, 2004 3:05 AM

HOTPOINT


A question for the ages...

Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

In the Latin :-p

Saturday, December 25, 2004 5:24 AM

REEQUEEN


It would probably also help to know the size/shape/density of the putative woodchuck.

Friday, December 24, 2004 9:16 PM

GUNRUNNER


Its impossible to know because no time frame was given no the size/shape/density of said wood. ;)

Friday, December 24, 2004 2:14 PM

REEQUEEN


Good answer, although "42" would also have been appropriate.

Friday, December 24, 2004 2:02 PM

THEGREYJEDI


As much wood as a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood.


POST YOUR COMMENTS

You must log in to post comments.

YOUR OPTIONS

THIS MONTH'S ENTRIES

ARCHIVES

2005 February

2005 January

2004 December

OUR SPONSOR