Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Fox is going to have THREE debate moderators. That's even more ridiculous than having these absurd meaningless debates in the first place.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Some might be wondering: how is it that Obama is able to keep lying about his fake unemployment figures?

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/how-the-department-of-labor-lies
-about-unemployment/question-3680921/

http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/labor-force-participatio
n-rate

---

You did see the numbers I provided above, from the Bush Administration and your beloved Elaine Chao, who was in charge of the BLS from 2001-2009.

It did go up from 4.2% in 2000, when she was in charge, to 7.3% in 2009, did it not?

---

You can't even get halfway through a sentence without resorting to lies, can you?
NO!!! Nobody from the Bush administration was in charge of Labor in 2000. I would agree that the disasterous Panetta was around, but I have long considered him to be Bush's greatest mistake.

---

Again, Bush was handed an Unemployment Rate of 4.2% entering 2000. That is NO LIE.

SGG

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Fox is going to have THREE debate moderators. That's even more ridiculous than having these absurd meaningless debates in the first place.

---

Fox is milking this for all it's worth. BTW, they did not use the Top 5 Polling Stats, they actually skipped over NBC's Poll and used the polling results of the
No. 6 polling, just to squeeze out Santorum and replace him with Kasich.

Let the games begin!


SGG

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
What a sham the "debate" was.
The Megan Bimbo hour, apparently. If I had any respect for her, she has vanquished it by now. Seems she is vying to be the intellectually bankrupt Candy Crowley of FNC. At least she had 3 times as much airtime as any candidate to broadcast her delusions, in case she runs for the Democrat Nomination soon.

All of the libtard fluff questions were directed at the serious candidates, and the liberal RINOs were provided cover by not being exposed to the libtard fluff questions which they would not have been able to answer. The RINOs were instead treated to the serious questions to make them appear less liberal, instead of serving the serious questions to the serious candidates.

I had thought it was going to be on Fox, so went home to watch, but it was on FNC instead.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Still can't visit reality?
Bush was Texas Governor in 2000. Bush was never President in 2000, let alone entering it.
You continue to insist that your Libtard facts are not lies, which is a lie.


Right, Bush only "won" in 2000 and took over in January 2001. An honest mistake.
So, he was not responsible for the Unemployment Rate of 4.2% in 2000, Clinton was.
So that means he was responsible from 2001-2008. At the end of 2008, the economy was in a shambles and Bush & Company were about to hand over the reigns to Obama. So once Obama took over the horrible economy was all his fault, correct? His responsibility, right?

He's been a terrible president because he nearly drove the country to financial ruin, right? In 2008, Bush's last year (lame duck year) the UR went from 5.0% in January to 7.3% in December. That's 2.3% points in less than a year. Who was in charge again? The Bush Administration. That's President Bush with a B. In January 2009 the UR was at 7.8% and got as high as 10.0% in October 2009. Tell me now that is a lie. The numbers were fudged by the Federal government and Obama is being set up by the Libtard Feds. Please tell me that!!!

I'll wait......................the floor is yours


SGG

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Still can't visit reality?
Bush was Texas Governor in 2000. Bush was never President in 2000, let alone entering it.
You continue to insist that your Libtard facts are not lies, which is a lie.


Right, Bush only "won" in 2000 and took over in January 2001. An honest mistake.
So, he was not responsible for the Unemployment Rate of 4.2% in 2000, Clinton was.
So that means he was responsible from 2001-2008. At the end of 2008, the economy was in a shambles and Bush & Company were about to hand over the reigns to Obama. So once Obama took over the horrible economy was all his fault, correct? His responsibility, right?

He's been a terrible president because he nearly drove the country to financial ruin, right? In 2008, Bush's last year (lame duck year) the UR went from 5.0% in January to 7.3% in December. That's 2.3% points in less than a year. Who was in charge again? The Bush Administration. That's President Bush with a B. In January 2009 the UR was at 7.8% and got as high as 10.0% in October 2009. Tell me now that is a lie. The numbers were fudged by the Federal government and Obama is being set up by the Libtard Feds. Please tell me that!!!

I'll wait......................the floor is yours


SGG

---

Yup, and it was worse when Obama took office in 2009 than it was in 2008. Bush still wasn't done doing damage to this country!

And Obama turned it around, creating more jobs than Reagan ever dreamed of, getting better unemployment numbers as well, and more than doubling the Dow, which lost nearly 45% of its value under the Bush regime.

You could almost say the economy is on fire.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:


Jongsstraw: "Fuck you and the gangbanged skank that didn't abort you."
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=56881

"If you don't know that, you're just a huge fucking idiot."
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=56819&p=2

"Prove you're not an asshole."
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=56761

---