REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Soros, hacked

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Friday, August 26, 2016 07:26
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 14628
PAGE 1 of 1

Monday, August 15, 2016 9:57 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


It must be the Russians again.


Quote:

George Soros is a Hungarian-American business magnate, investor, philanthropist, political activist and author who is of Hungarian-Jewish ancestry and holds dual citizenship. He drives more than 50 global and regional programs and foundations. Soros is named an architect and a sponsor of almost every revolution and coup around the world for the last 25 years. The USA is thought to be a vampire due to him and his puppets, not a lighthouse of freedom and democracy. His minions spill blood of millions and millions of people just to make him even more rich. Soros is an oligarch sponsoring the Democratic party, Hillary Clinton, hundreds of politicians all over the world. This website is designed to let everyone inside George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and related organisations. We present you the workplans, strategies, priorities and other activities of Soros. These documents shed light on one of the most influential network operating worldwide.


http://soros.dcleaks.com/

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 1:40 PM

REAVERFAN


Here's some more reichwing misdirection trying to make Soros some kind of Koch-style manipulator.

Sorry, it doesn't add up. When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 1:44 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
It must be the Russians again.




Again SIG is protecting the Russians. Our FBI confirms the hacks of the DNC come from Russia. Yet SIG defends the Russians insinuating our FBI is lying


FBI Confirms Investigation Into Massive Hack of DNC

http://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-confirms-investigation-massive-hack-dnc/s
tory?id=40855489

____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 2:13 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

The FBI has acknowledged that it is investigating a massive breach of the Democratic National Committee's computers
so the FBI is investigating the hack to find out who did it

Quote:

which [some]sources
Who? Not the FBI

Quote:

and [some] experts
Who? I have read "some" experts say it was, and other experts (such as James Clapper) who tell people to stop hyperventilating. It is extremely difficult, according to MY expert, to determine who hacked what, as it is also extremely easy to spoof a source (i.e. put in information that points to another source, not the real one).

Quote:

say was likely the work of government hackers in Russia.
Uh huh.

Dood, you're a one-man McCarthy Commission, aren't you?

Stop hyperventilating.


--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 2:23 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Our FBI confirms the hacks of the DNC come from Russia.

Acutally - no.

So once again THUGGR proves himself an illiterate idiot! The article says the FBI merely confirms it's investigating the hack.
The people who say it's the Russians are NOT the FBI.

The FBI has acknowledged that it is investigating a massive breach of the Democratic National Committee's computers, which sources and experts (NOTE: NOT the FBI) say was likely the work of government hackers in Russia.

Not only did the hack apparently allow the cyber operatives to steal opposition research on Republican nominee Donald Trump, but also, many suspect, it led to the theft of internal messages that show efforts by DNC officials to undermine Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders during the primary season. Those damaging emails have since been released by WikiLeaks, agitating Sanders supporters at the start of the Democratic convention in Philadelphia and prompting DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to tender her resignation, effective at the end of the week.

"The FBI is investigating a cyber intrusion involving the DNC and are working to determine the nature and scope of the matter," the FBI said in a statement today. "A compromise of this nature is something we take very seriously, and the FBI will continue to investigate and hold accountable those who pose a threat in cyberspace."

For weeks, the FBI had been unwilling to confirm it was looking into the hack — or even that such a hack had taken place, as The Washington Post first reported in June.

Nevertheless, a cybersecurity firm (NOTE: NOT the FBI) working with the DNC spoke extensively at the time about how the DNC was hacked by "two separate Russian intelligence agencies."

Dmitri Alperovitch, a co-founder of firm CrowdStrike (NOTE: NOT the FBI) , told ABC News in June he knew "definitively" that the GRU, Russia's military intelligence agency, was behind the cyber attack and that he was "less confident in but [had] reason to believe" Russia's Federal Security Service also took part. A Russian Embassy spokesman denied the allegations.

The hackers were "looking for opposition research on Trump and his campaign" and "they did take opposition research on Trump," Alperovitch said (NOTE: NOT the FBI) at the time.

"This also shows you espionage has now moved off the just physical realm of recruiting spies and getting information. It's now through cyber means. This is a traditional target of Russian intelligence for 100 years but now doing it for cyber," he said (NOTE: NOT the FBI) , referring to U.S. candidates and campaigns. "I would say this is not surprising at all. This is what intelligence agencies" want to get.

He said (NOTE: NOT the FBI) that the DNC is "absolutely" safer now and that CrowdStrike did a full remediation and "kicked out both adversaries." He added that CrowdStrike installed software because the firm "expect[s] for them to come back."

"Russian intelligence's interest in the U.S. political system will not cease. It will only intensify, and there will be ongoing attempts to hack into the network going forward," Alperovitch said (NOTE: NOT the FBI) .







Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 2:58 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by G:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
It must be the Russians again.


Quote:

George Soros is a Hungarian-American business magnate, investor, philanthropist, political activist and author who is of Hungarian-Jewish ancestry and holds dual citizenship. He drives more than 50 global and regional programs and foundations. Soros is named an architect and a sponsor of almost every revolution and coup around the world for the last 25 years. The USA is thought to be a vampire due to him and his puppets, not a lighthouse of freedom and democracy. His minions spill blood of millions and millions of people just to make him even more rich. Soros is an oligarch sponsoring the Democratic party, Hillary Clinton, hundreds of politicians all over the world. This website is designed to let everyone inside George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and related organisations. We present you the workplans, strategies, priorities and other activities of Soros. These documents shed light on one of the most influential network operating worldwide.


http://soros.dcleaks.com/



Brilliant - a site about hacking that wants you to download something to your computer.



Russian no doubt G. I suggest people should be very careful when following any of SIG's and 1KIKI's links.

That said SIG, my post shows that you and 1kiki as always, come down on the side of Russia. After all, my claim is that the two of you are Russian trolls. By using your own posts I show your unflappable defense of Russia which proves my point.

Get it

____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 3:36 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Brilliant - a site about hacking that wants you to download something to your computer.
Fortunately, I have excellent security on my net. So I will boldly go in your stead. (BTW, you have more to fear from google.)

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 4:35 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Brilliant - a site about hacking that wants you to download something to your computer.
Fortunately, I have excellent security on my net. So I will boldly go in your stead. (BTW, you have more to fear from google.)




Of course SIG I am sure the G.R.U., Russia’s military intelligence service has great security.

You're such an ass
____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 6:24 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.


Here is an exact and direct comparison between the Koch Bros and Soros spending in the USA. While the Koch Bros do outspend Soros (within the USA) the difference in not "orders of magnitude", both spend mid-double-digit millions of dollars.

Quote:

When it comes to the combination of institutional lobbying, 527 group donations and PAC expenditures, Koch Industries far out-spends Soros’ hedge fund and think tank, $57.4 million to $12.8 million. Most of this money is attributable to lobbying expenditures.

Soros and the Koch brothers have all donated to federal political campaigns and committees. While Soros has far out-spent the Koch brothers in donating to 527 groups, especially when considering his incredible $23.7 million in donations to the groups between 2003 and 2004, the Koch brothers have donated more money to federal candidates and committees.

The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million.



So, Koch Bros spent $57.4+$4.0 = $61.4.
Soros spent $12.8+$34.2 = $47.0
About the same

Soros, OTOH, spends a lot of money to influence elections outside of the USA, and on Dem foreign policy, something that the Koch Bros don't do. (They spend on USA energy policy)

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle-koch-brothe
rs
/

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 6:36 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.


Here is an exact and direct comparison between the Koch Bros and Soros spending in the USA. While the Koch Bros do outspend Soros (within the USA) the difference in not "orders of magnitude", both spend mid-double-digit millions of dollars.

Quote:

When it comes to the combination of institutional lobbying, 527 group donations and PAC expenditures, Koch Industries far out-spends Soros’ hedge fund and think tank, $57.4 million to $12.8 million. Most of this money is attributable to lobbying expenditures.

Soros and the Koch brothers have all donated to federal political campaigns and committees. While Soros has far out-spent the Koch brothers in donating to 527 groups, especially when considering his incredible $23.7 million in donations to the groups between 2003 and 2004, the Koch brothers have donated more money to federal candidates and committees.

The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million.



So, Koch Bros spent $57.4+$4.0 = $61.4.
Soros spent $12.8+$34.2 = $47.0
About the same

Soros, OTOH, spends a lot of money to influence elections outside of the USA, and on Dem foreign policy, something that the Koch Bros don't do. (They spend on USA energy policy)

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle-koch-brothe
rs
/

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.



I would answer this post like this SIG.

Why Russia buys Putin’s lies

MOSCOW — The outside world knows Russian-backed militants shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, using missiles supplied by Moscow, even if few leaders are yet willing to say outright that Vladimir Putin has blood on his hands (again).

But the Russian public is happy to buy Putin’s lies.


“It’s obvious the Ukrainians did this, the separatists don’t have the weaponry or the ability to shoot down aircraft at that altitude,” a partner at a major law firm told me.

Never mind that the “separatists” had shot down at least two Ukrainian planes in the week before, or that the Ukrainians had no reason to shoot at any plane because the militants have no airpower.

Then there’s an economist at the Ministry of Finance: “The Ukrainians are fascists, of course they’re responsible.”

One university professor was a bit more honest: “You don’t understand. We’re Russians, we will never admit guilt to outsiders, especially to Americans. Even if we know we’re guilty.”

In the outside world, people know the “rebels” have done all they could to impede any impartial investigation even seizing the bodies of the 298 innocent victims, and that the missile launchers were quickly pulled back into Russia after the atrocity.

But this is a schizophrenic society. People distrust their own government, but they distrust and hate foreigners even more. Many understand that Russia is probably responsible, but they’ll never admit it; it’s not a society given to self-criticism or honesty.

http://nypost.com/2014/07/21/why-russia-buys-putins-lies/

Perhaps your and 1kiki's thread development and lying posts is a sick attempt to justify your following Putin. Maybe what you are doing by constantly digging up dirt on the WEST is a kind of therapy for you. So you can say to yourselves, see we ( Russia ) ain't so bad.

____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 8:10 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.-REAVERFAN

Here is an exact and direct comparison between the Koch Bros and Soros spending in the USA. While the Koch Bros do outspend Soros (within the USA) the difference in not "orders of magnitude", both spend mid-double-digit millions of dollars.

Quote:

When it comes to the combination of institutional lobbying, 527 group donations and PAC expenditures, Koch Industries far out-spends Soros’ hedge fund and think tank, $57.4 million to $12.8 million. Most of this money is attributable to lobbying expenditures.

Soros and the Koch brothers have all donated to federal political campaigns and committees. While Soros has far out-spent the Koch brothers in donating to 527 groups, especially when considering his incredible $23.7 million in donations to the groups between 2003 and 2004, the Koch brothers have donated more money to federal candidates and committees.

The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million.



So, Koch Bros spent $57.4+$4.0 = $61.4.
Soros spent $12.8+$34.2 = $47.0
About the same

Soros, OTOH, spends a lot of money to influence elections outside of the USA, and on Dem foreign policy, something that the Koch Bros don't do. (They spend on USA energy policy)



http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle-koch-brothe
rs
/


I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 9:11 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.-REAVERFAN

Here is an exact and direct comparison between the Koch Bros and Soros spending in the USA. While the Koch Bros do outspend Soros (within the USA) the difference in not "orders of magnitude", both spend mid-double-digit millions of dollars.

Quote:

When it comes to the combination of institutional lobbying, 527 group donations and PAC expenditures, Koch Industries far out-spends Soros’ hedge fund and think tank, $57.4 million to $12.8 million. Most of this money is attributable to lobbying expenditures.

Soros and the Koch brothers have all donated to federal political campaigns and committees. While Soros has far out-spent the Koch brothers in donating to 527 groups, especially when considering his incredible $23.7 million in donations to the groups between 2003 and 2004, the Koch brothers have donated more money to federal candidates and committees.

The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million.



So, Koch Bros spent $57.4+$4.0 = $61.4.
Soros spent $12.8+$34.2 = $47.0
About the same

Soros, OTOH, spends a lot of money to influence elections outside of the USA, and on Dem foreign policy, something that the Koch Bros don't do. (They spend on USA energy policy)



http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle-koch-brothe
rs
/


I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.



OH, I'm crushed. Didn't you like my comment to this post when you posted this above? I'm absolutely besides myself.

____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 10:27 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by G:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
“You don’t understand. We’re Russians, we will never admit guilt to outsiders, especially to Americans. Even if we know we’re guilty.”



Don't we know it!



Yep, we witness it here every damn day.

____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 15, 2016 10:37 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Originally posted by THGRRI:
“You don’t understand. We’re Russians ..."



You are???!!!


I thought you were Estonian. Though Russia, Estonian. It's all the same. Right?




Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:11 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
“You don’t understand. We’re Russians ..."



You are???!!!


I thought you were Estonian. Though Russia, Estonian. It's all the same. Right?




“You don’t understand. We’re Russians, we will never admit guilt to outsiders, especially to Americans. Even if we know we’re guilty.”


No, but we know you sure are don't we. You know that's G quoting a Russian professor. It sure does catch the essence of you and SIG. Don't it comrade..
____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 9:02 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Yup, they're Russians! It must be true, because they keep denying it!

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:19 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yup, they're Russians! It must be true, because they keep denying it!




No ass, it's because you keep defending every thing Russia does. And it doesn't matter how bad it is. If you were American as you claim, there's no way you would do that. It's like the Russian professor says and I quote “You don’t understand. We’re Russians, we will never admit guilt to outsiders, especially to Americans. Even if we know we’re guilty.”

Yet you and 1kiki constantly bash America while defending Russia. No American would ever do that. It's a dead give away. Simply to most but apparently way over your head comrade.

As I have said many times. You two ain't that bright. You think you are but all you do is cut and paste. Most times your comments don't support what you have pasted. This is why your arguments get picked apart and destroyed by the other posters here. Again simple, you are dishonest and easy to expose as such.

____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:51 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.



Because you are Russian or a Russian sympathizer you will never get Americans. What you are claiming as American traits doesn't hold up in the land of the free. You know, the place Russians risked life and limb to defect to.

No SIG this represents a people who signs over their freedoms to a supreme leader. Russia SIG, this type of thinking represents Russia

____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:50 PM

REAVERFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.


Here is an exact and direct comparison between the Koch Bros and Soros spending in the USA. While the Koch Bros do outspend Soros (within the USA) the difference in not "orders of magnitude", both spend mid-double-digit millions of dollars.

Quote:

When it comes to the combination of institutional lobbying, 527 group donations and PAC expenditures, Koch Industries far out-spends Soros’ hedge fund and think tank, $57.4 million to $12.8 million. Most of this money is attributable to lobbying expenditures.

Soros and the Koch brothers have all donated to federal political campaigns and committees. While Soros has far out-spent the Koch brothers in donating to 527 groups, especially when considering his incredible $23.7 million in donations to the groups between 2003 and 2004, the Koch brothers have donated more money to federal candidates and committees.

The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million.



So, Koch Bros spent $57.4+$4.0 = $61.4.
Soros spent $12.8+$34.2 = $47.0
About the same

Soros, OTOH, spends a lot of money to influence elections outside of the USA, and on Dem foreign policy, something that the Koch Bros don't do. (They spend on USA energy policy)

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle-koch-brothe
rs
/

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

Wrong. The Kochs spend way more money than that. You're ignoring the dozens of groups they're behind that DON'T use their name.

They literally buy governments. Look at Kansas or Indiana. Look at ALEC.

Very dishonest of you.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:13 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Soros probably outspends the Kochs 100 to 1. It's not even close. He's beyond courrpt.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 18, 2016 7:03 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yup, they're Russians! It must be true, because they keep denying it!


I think maybe G and Thuggery should prove to us that Kiki and Siggy are Russians.

They can do so this way:
With hands and feet bound and concrete shoes, they shall jump into a raging river. If they float to the top and stay afloat, they are proven correct and Kiki and Siggy are proven to be Russian. If, however, G and Thuggery do not surface for 2 hours, then their claims are proven false and we will all know that Kiki and Siggy are not Russians.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, August 20, 2016 9:30 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Wrong. The Kochs spend way more money than that. You're ignoring the dozens of groups they're behind that DON'T use their name.
Uh huh

So, speaking of George Soros' PAID TROLLS ....

Quote:

In one document entitled: “Open Society Initiative For Europe (OSIFE). Mapping the Ukrainian debate in Greece” ... Soros offers a consultant a remuneration of $6,500 (gross) for “at least 15 full working days in carrying out this task” plus all expenses paid.

The aim of this task:

The consultant is expected to chart the main players in the Greek debate on Ukraine, outline the key arguments and their evolution in the past 18 months. Specifically, the report will take stock of any existing polling evidence provide a ‘who is who?’ with information about at least
– 6 newspapers,
– 10 audiovisual outlets (TV and radio),
– 6 internet sites,
– About 50 opinion leaders and trends in social networks[1].

Categorize the main strains of discussion and eventually identify different sides / camps of the discussion.

Provide a brief account of how Russia has tried to influence the Greek debate on Ukraine through domestic actors and outlets

Include a section with recommendations on
What are the spaces OSF should engage and would most likely to have impact?
– What are the voices (of reason or doubt) that should be amplified?


Open Society Initiative For Europe (OSIFE) selected Iannis Carras for the Greek media mapping grant. The justification why he was chosen…

All contracts were for the same amount. We needed to find highly specialized researchers to map the debate on Ukraine in Europe, therefore we identified a shortlist of candidates in consultation with colleagues in the Think Tank Fund, OSEPI and in consultation with members of the OSIFE board and chose the most qualified who could produce the report in the time allowed. In the case of Greece we agreed that Iannis Carras, an economic and social historian of Balkan and Russian relations with expert knowledge of Greece’s NGOs and social movements, was the best suited to the task.

What is even more interesting is not the grant from OSIFE, but a letter from grant winner Carras to a person named Mathew (another Greek speaker???), outlining his plan in detail for pushing Soros’ Ukraine agenda in Greece.

I guess Carras was George Soros' paid troll.

Quote:

Of significance is how Carras tells Mathew about Greek society’s overall suspicion of The Open Society after the roll in played in seeding unrest in Yugoslavia. Carras even tells Mathew to not mention The Open Society in Greece.

“Do you want your name to appear alongside mine on the paper? Do make comments on all of the below.

In general, and at your discretion, do not say you are doing this for Open Society because it is likely to close down doors. There’s a lot of suspicion about Open Society in Greece, mainly because of its positions vis-à-vis the former Yugoslavia. As I am simultaneously writing an article for Aspen Review Eastern Europe that can be used as the organisation for which research like this is taking place.”

Working for an organization that needs to remain hidden because of the wide distrust it evokes in the target population.

Quote:

Carras then goes on to outline his approach in manipulating Greek society, covering topics such as:

1. Media.
2. Political parties and think tanks
3. Opinion polls.
4. Business relations.
5. Religious and cultural ties.
6. Migration and diaspora.
7. Greece and Ukraine in the context of Greece’s economic crisis.
8. Greece, Ukraine and the Cyprus issue.
9. Names and brief description of significant actors: a ‘who is who?’ with information on at least 50 opinion leaders


Carras notes how Russia has much goodwill in Greece, exercising “signifiant soft power”. Carras notes that Greece is, at this moment, a weak player in the Ukraine debate and the Greek Foreign Minister Kotzias realises this.

Summary: I am working on the hypotheses largely born out by the interviews carried out so far that Russia has significant soft power in Greece though this does not easily convert into hard power (e.g. vetoing EU sanctions).Greeks are basically not very interested in Ukraine and the crisis there. They reflect and understand that conflict through their own economic crisis and their relations with Europe (nowadays primarily Europe and not US). To the extent that relations with Europe remain the focus and do not go off the rails, Greece will bark but will not bite. If they improve, Greece might not even bark (as can be seen with Greece’s policy on Israel, Kotzias can be very much a realist).

Carras does warn that should Greece’s economic situation deteriorate further, than Greece may very well look to Russia for support, and this has implications on the Ukraine plan.

If they deteriorate however, Greece will be looking to Russia for increased support and will alter its Ukraine policies accordingly. Do you agree with these hypotheses? Can you find confirmation for or against them in the media outlets examined?

Carras places extra emphasis on influencing the media in Greece, citing various large news outlets that the Soros NGO can target, including approaching left wing and right wing blogs.

This is the bulk of the work (we have to think about how to divide the work up). We have to provide a ‘who is who?’ with information about at least 6 newspapers, 10 audio-visual outlets (TV and radio) and 6 internet sites. Some of these will be obvious, but, even in these cases, change over time (at least eighteen months) is an important consideration. Here are some suggestions for newspapers: Kathimerini, Avgi, Ta Nea, Vima, Efymerida Syntakton, Eleutherotypia, Proto Thema, Rizospastis? etc. What else? Protagon? Athens Review of Books? (info on Kotzias). As for TV, we’ll just do the main ones. What about left wing blogs? What about commercial radio stations? I think we should cover Aristera sta FM. Sky. What else? Anything from the nationalist and far right? My choice would be Ardin (already looking at this) which at least tries to be serious. Patria is even more unsavoury. I’ll deal with the religious web sites in the culture and religion appendix. I think we should interview Kostas Nisenko ( http://www.kathimerini.gr/757296/article/epikairothta/kosmos/viaih-epi
8e
...) and Kostas Geropoulos of New Europe to get into the issues involved… not at all sure though that it’s advisable to talk to the Russia correspondents Thanasis Avgerinos, Dimitris Liatsos, Achileas Patsoukas etc. (I know all of them). Also if we come across articles with interesting information on any one of the topics, we should mail them to one another.



I noticed that Soros didn't target Fireflyfans.net. What an oversight!

More at
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-19/leaked-memo-shows-soros-pushe
d-greece-support-ukraine-coup-paint-russia-enemy



--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 21, 2016 7:27 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


GEORGE SOROS AND HIS FAMILY ARE MAJORS DONOR TO HILLARY CLINTON. HE SPENDS A LOT OF MONEY TO INFLUENCE POLITICS ABROAD.

Leaked Memo Proves Soros Ruled Ukraine In 2014: Minutes From "Breakfast With US Ambassador Pyatt"

Quote:

We noted in a previous post how important Ukraine was to George Soros, with documents from DC Leaks that show Soros, and his Open Society NGO, scouring the Greek media and political landscape to push the benefits of his Ukraine coup upon a Russian leaning Greek society.

Now more documents, in the massive 2,500 leaked tranche, show the immense power and control Soros had over Ukraine immediately following the illegal Maidan government overthrow.

Soros and his NGO executives held detailed and extensive meetings with just about every actor involved in the Maidan coup: from US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, to Ukraine’s Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Justice, Health, and Education.

The only person missing was Victoria Nuland, though we are sure those meeting minutes are waiting to see the light of day.

Plans to subvert and undermine Russian influence and cultural ties to Ukraine are a central focus of every conversation. US hard power, and EU soft power, is central towards bringing Ukraine into the neo-liberal model that Soros champions, while bringing Russia to its economic knees.

Soros' NGO, International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) plays a key role in the formation of the “New Ukraine”…the term Soros frequently uses when referring to his Ukraine project.

In a document titled, "Breakfast with US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt", George Soros, (aka GS), discusses Ukraine’s future with: ...



--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 21, 2016 8:39 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


These are the top two results from a websearch Soros+ NGO+spending.

Without attempting to pursue whether the individual organizations are beneficial to Americans' interests or not, these lists are intended to show that George Soros spends considerable money on politics both inside and outside of the USA. I truncated the descriptions significantly, but it you want to know more you can go to the original website.

Quote:

Organizations that, in recent years, have received direct funding and assistance from George Soros and his Open Society Foundations (OSF) include the following. (Comprehensive profiles of each are available in the "Groups" section of DiscoverTheNetworks.org):

Advancement Project: This organization works to organize "communities of color"

Air America Radio: Now defunct, this was a self-identified "liberal" radio network.

Al-Haq: This NGO produces highly politicized reports, papers, books, and legal analyses regarding alleged Israeli human-rights abuses committed against Palestinians.

All of Us or None: This organization seeks to change voting laws

Alliance for Justice: Best known for its activism vis a vis the appointment of federal judges, this group consistently depicts Republican judicial nominees as "extremists."

America Coming Together: Soros played a major role in creating this group, whose purpose was to coordinate and organize pro-Democrat voter-mobilization programs.

America Votes: Soros also played a major role in creating this group, whose get-out-the-vote campaigns targeted likely Democratic voters.

America's Voice: This open-borders group seeks to promote “comprehensive” immigration reform that includes a robust agenda in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens.

American Bar Association Commission on Immigration Policy: This organization "opposes laws that require employers and persons providing education, health care, or other social services to verify citizenship or immigration status."

American Bridge 21st Century: This Super PAC conducts opposition research designed to help Democratic political candidates defeat their Republican foes.

American Civil Liberties Union: This group opposes virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by the U.S. government.

American Constitution Society for Law and Policy: This Washington, DC-based think tank seeks to move American jurisprudence to the left by recruiting, indoctrinating, and mobilizing young law students

American Family Voices: This group creates and coordinates media campaigns charging Republicans with wrongdoing.

American Federation of Teachers: ...

American Friends Service Committee: This group views the United States as the principal cause of human suffering around the world.

American Immigration Council: This non-profit organization is a prominent member of the open-borders lobby.

American Immigration Law Foundation: This group supports amnesty for illegal aliens, on whose behalf it litigates against the U.S. government.

American Independent News Network: This organization promotes "impact journalism" that advocates progressive change.

American Institute for Social Justice: AISJ's goal is to produce skilled community organizers who can “transform poor communities” by agitating for increased government spending on city services, drug interdiction, crime prevention, housing, public-sector jobs, access to healthcare, and public schools.

American Library Association: This group has been an outspoken critic of the Bush administration's War on Terror -- most particularly, Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act, which it calls "a present danger to the constitutional rights and privacy rights of library users."

The American Prospect, Inc.: This corporation trains and mentors young leftwing journalists, and organizes strategy meetings for leftist leaders.

Amnesty International: This organization directs a grossly disproportionate share of its criticism for human rights violations at the United States and Israel.

Applied Research Center: Viewing the United States as a nation where “structural racism” is deeply “embedded in the fabric of society,” ARC seeks to "build a fair and equal society" by demanding “concrete change from our most powerful institutions."

Arab American Institute Foundation: The Arab American Institute denounces the purportedly widespread civil liberties violations directed against Arab Americans in the post-9/11 period, and characterizes Israel as a brutal oppressor of the Palestinian people.

Aspen Institute: This organization promotes radical environmentalism and views America as a nation plagued by deep-seated “structural racism.”

Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN): This group conducts voter mobilization drives on behalf of leftist Democrats.

Ballot Initiative Strategy Center: This organization seeks to advance “a national progressive strategy” by means of ballot measures—state-level legislative proposals that pass successfully through a petition (“initiative”) process and are then voted upon by the public.

Bill of Rights Defense Committee: This group provides a detailed blueprint for activists

Black Alliance for Just Immigration: This organization seeks to create a unified movement for “social and economic justice” centered on black racial identity.

Blueprint North Carolina: This group seeks to “influence state policy in North Carolina so that residents of the state benefit from more progressive policies..."

Brennan Center for Justice: This think tank/legal activist group generates scholarly studies, mounts media campaigns, files amicus briefs, gives pro bono support to activists, and litigates test cases in pursuit of radical "change."

Brookings Institution: This organization has been involved with a variety of internationalist and state-sponsored programs

Campaign for America's Future: This group supports tax hikes, socialized medicine, and a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs.

Campaign for Better Health Care: This organization favors a single-payer, government-run, universal health care system.

Campaign for Youth Justice: This organization [is against] “transferring juveniles to the adult criminal-justice system"

Campus Progress: A project of the Soros-bankrolled Center for American Progress, this group seeks to "strengthen progressive voices on college and university campuses,

Casa de Maryland: This organization aggressively lobbies legislators to vote in favor of policies that promote expanded rights, including amnesty, for illegal aliens currently residing in the United States.

Catalist: Seeks "to help progressive organizations realize measurable increases in civic participation and electoral success

Catholics for Choice: This nominally Catholic organization supports women's right to abortion-on-demand.

Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good: This political nonprofit group is dedicated to generating support from the Catholic community for leftwing candidates, causes, and legislation.

Center for American Progress: This leftist think tank is headed by former Clinton Chief of staff John Podesta, works closely with Hillary Clinton, and employs numerous former Clinton administration staffers.

Center for Community Change: This group recruits and trains activists to spearhead leftist "political issue campaigns."

Center for Constitutional Rights: Pro-Castro organization

Center for Economic and Policy Research: This group opposed welfare reform, supports "living wage" laws, rejects tax cuts, and consistently lauds the professed achievements of socialist regimes, most notably Venezuela.

Center for Reproductive Rights: CRR's mission is to guarantee safe, affordable contraception and abortion-on-demand for all women, including adolescents.

Center for Responsible Lending: This organization was a major player in the subprime mortgage crisis.

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: Reasoning from the premise that tax cuts generally help only the wealthy, this organization advocates greater tax expenditures on social welfare programs for low earners.

Center on Wisconsin Strategy (COWS): Aiming to redistribute wealth by way of higher taxes imposed on those whose incomes are above average

Change America Now: Formed in December 2006, Change America Now describes itself as "an independent political organization created to educate citizens on the failed policies of the Republican Congress

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington: This group litigates and brings ethics charges against "government officials who sacrifice the common good to special interests" and "betray the public trust."

Coalition for an International Criminal Court: This group seeks to subordinate American criminal-justice procedures to those of an international court.

Common Cause: This organization aims to bring about campaign-finance reform, pursue media reform resembling the Fairness Doctrine, and cut military budgets in favor of increased social-welfare and environmental spending.

Constitution Project: This organization seeks to challenge the legality of military commissions

Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund: opposes oil exploration in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Democracy Alliance: This self-described "liberal organization" aims to raise $200 million to develop a funding clearinghouse for leftist groups. Soros is a major donor to this group.

Democracy 21: This group is a staunch supporter of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, also known as the McCain-Feingold Act.

Democracy Now!: Democracy Now! was created in 1996 by WBAI radio news director Amy Goodman and four partners to provide "perspectives rarely heard in the U.S. corporate-sponsored media,"

Amy Goodman was prime supporter of the destruction of Libya, FYI

Quote:

Democratic Justice Fund: DJF opposes the Patriot Act and most efforts to restrict or regulate immigration into the United States

Democratic Party: Soros' funding activities are devoted largely to helping the Democratic Party solidify its power base. In a November 2003 interview, Soros stated that defeating President Bush in 2004 "is the central focus of my life" ... "a matter of life and death."


Demos: This organization lobbies federal and state policymakers to “addres[s] the economic insecurity and inequality that characterize American society today”

Drum Major Institute: This group describes itself as “a non-partisan, non-profit think tank generating the ideas that fuel the progressive movement,”

Earthjustice: This group seeks to place severe restrictions on how U.S. land and waterways may be used.

Economic Policy Institute: This organization believes that “government must play an active role in protecting the economically vulnerable, ensuring equal opportunity, and improving the well-being of all Americans.”

Electronic Privacy Information Center: This organization has been a harsh critic of the USA PATRIOT Act

Ella Baker Center for Human Rights: Co-founded by the revolutionary communist Van Jones, this anti-poverty organization claims that “decades of disinvestment in our cities” -- compounded by “excessive, racist policing and over-incarceration” -- have “led to despair and homelessness.”

EMILY's List: This political network raises money for Democratic female political candidates

who often have nothing to recommend them except that they are Democratic women.

Quote:

Energy Action Coalition: Founded in 2004, this group describes itself as “a coalition of 50 youth-led environmental and social justice groups working together to build the youth clean energy and climate movement.”

Equal Justice USA: This group claims that America's criminal-justice system is plagued by “significant race and class biases,” and thus seeks to promote major reforms.

Fair Immigration Reform Movement: This is the open-borders arm of the Center for Community Change.

Faithful America: This organization promotes the redistribution of wealth, an end to enhanced interrogation procedures vis a vis prisoners-of-war, the enactment of policies to combat global warming, and the creation of a government-run heath care system.

Feminist Majority: Characterizing the United States as an inherently sexist nation, this group focuses on "advancing the legal, social and political equality of women with men"

Four Freedoms Fund: This organization was designed to serve as a conduit through which large foundations could fund state-based open-borders organizations more flexibly and quickly.

Free Exchange on Campus: This organization was created solely to oppose the efforts of one individual, David Horowitz

Free Press: This "media reform" organization has worked closely with many notable leftists and such organizations as Media Matters for America, Air America Radio, Global Exchange, Code Pink, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, the Revolutionary Communist Party, Mother Jones magazine, and Pacifica Radio.

Funding Exchange: Dedicated to the concept of philanthropy as a vehicle for social change, this organization pairs leftist donors and foundations with likeminded groups and activists who are dedicated to bringing about their own version of "progressive" change and social justice."

Gamaliel Foundation: Modeling its tactics on those of the radical Sixties activist Saul Alinsky, this group takes a strong stand against current homeland security measures and immigration restrictions.

Gisha: Center for the Legal Protection of Freedom of Movement: This anti-Israel organization seeks to help Palestinians "exercise their right to freedom of movement."

Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect: mass atrocities

Global Exchange: Established in 1988 by pro-Castro radical Medea Benjamin, this group consistently condemns America's foreign policy, business practices, and domestic life.

Grantmakers Without Borders: GWB tends to be very supportive of leftist environmental, anti-war, and civil rights groups.

Green For All: This group was created by Van Jones to lobby for federal climate, energy, and economic policy initiatives.

Health Care for America Now: This group supports a “single payer” model

Human Rights Campaign: The largest "lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender" lobbying group in the United States, HRC supports political candidates and legislation that will advance the LGBT agenda.

Human Rights First: This group supports open borders and the rights of illegal aliens;

Human Rights Watch: This group directs a disproportionate share of its criticism at the United States and Israel. It opposes the death penalty in all cases, and supports open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens.

I'lam: Anti-Israel NGO seeks "to develop and empower the Arab media and to give voice to Palestinian issues."

Immigrant Defense Project: To advance the cause of illegal immigrants

Immigrant Legal Resource Center: This group claims to have helped gain amnesty for some three million illegal aliens in the U.S.

Immigrant Workers Citizenship Project: This open-borders organization advocates mass immigration to the U.S.

Immigration Advocates Network: This alliance of immigrant-rights groups

Immigration Policy Center: IPC is an advocate of open borders

Independent Media Center: This Internet-based, news and events bulletin board

Independent Media Institute: IMI administers the SPIN Project (Strategic Press Information Network)

Institute for America's Future: IAF supports socialized medicine, increased government funding for education, and the creation of an infrastructure

Institute for New Economic Thinking: Seeking to create a new worldwide "economic paradigm,"

Institute for Policy Studies: This think tank has long supported Communist and anti-American causes around the world.

Institute for Public Accuracy: This anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-Israel organization sponsored actor Sean Penn’s celebrated visit to Baghdad in 2002.

Institute for Women's Policy Research: publishes research to draw attention to this alleged state of affairs. It also advocates unrestricted access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand, stating that "access to abortion is essential to the economic well-being of women and girls."

International Crisis Group: Mideast Director, Robert Malley, who was President Bill Clinton's Special Assistant for Arab-Israeli Affairs.

J Street: This anti-Israel group warns that Israel’s choice to take military action to stop Hamas' terrorist attacks “will prove counter-productive and only deepen the cycle of violence in the region”

Jewish Funds for Justice: This organization views government intervention and taxpayer funding as crucial components of enlightened social policy.

Joint Victory Campaign 2004: Founded by George Soros and Harold Ickes, this group was a major fundraising entity for Democrats during the 2004 election cycle.

Justice at Stake: judges to be appointed by nonpartisan, independent commissions

LatinoJustice PRLDF: This organization supports bilingual education, the racial gerrymandering of voting districts, and expanded rights for illegal aliens.

Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: uses the courts to mandate race-based affirmative action

League of United Latin American Citizens: favors racial preferences; supports the legalization of illegal Hispanic aliens; opposes military surveillance of U.S. borders; opposes making English America's official language;

League of Women Voters Education Fund: supports taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; supports "motor-voter" registration,

League of Young Voters: seeks to “empowe[r] young people nationwide”

Lynne Stewart Defense Committee: IRS records indicate that Soros's Open Society Institute made a September 2002 grant of $20,000 to this organization. Stewart was the criminal-defense attorney who was later convicted for abetting her client, the "blind sheik" Omar Abdel Rahman, in terrorist activities connected with his Islamic Group.

Machsom Watch: This organization describes itself as "a movement of Israeli women, peace activists from all sectors of Israeli society, who oppose the Israeli occupation and the denial of Palestinians' rights to move freely in their land."

MADRE: deems America the world's foremost violator of human rights

Malcolm X Grassroots Movement: seeks to establish an independent black nation in the southeastern United States; and demands reparations for slavery.

Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition: This group calls for the expansion of civil rights and liberties for illegal aliens

Media Fund: Soros played a major role in creating this group,

Media Matters for America: This organization is a "web-based, not-for-profit … progressive research and information center"

Mercy Corps: places all blame for Palestinian poverty and suffering directly on Israel.

Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF): advocates open borders, free college tuition for illegal aliens, lowered educational standards to accommodate Hispanics, and voting rights for criminals.

Midwest Academy: trains radical activists in the tactics of direct action, targeting, confrontation, and intimidation.

Migration Policy Institute: This group seeks to create "a North America with gradually disappearing border controls ... with permanent migration remaining at moderate levels."

Military Families Speak Out: This group ascribes the U.S. invasion of Iraq to American imperialism and lust for oil.

Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment: This group is the rebranded Missouri branch of the now-defunct, pro-socialist, community organization ACORN.

MoveOn.org: This Web-based organization supports Democratic political candidates through fundraising, advertising, and get-out-the-vote drives.

Ms. Foundation for Women: This group laments what it views as the widespread and enduring flaws of American society: racism, sexism, homophobia, and the violation of civil rights and liberties. It focuses its philanthropy on groups that promote affirmative action for women, unfettered access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand, amnesty for illegal aliens, and big government generally.

NARAL Pro-Choice America: This group supports taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand, and works to elect pro-abortion Democrats.

NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund: ()

The Nation Institute: sponsors leftist conferences, fellowships, awards for radical activists, and journalism internships.

National Abortion Federation: opposes any restrictions on abortion

National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty: the first "fully staffed national organization exclusively devoted to abolishing capital punishment."

National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy: promotes grant-makers and grantees with leftist agendas, while criticizing their conservative counterparts.

National Committee for Voting Integrity: opposes "the implementation of proof of citizenship and photo identification requirements for eligible electors in American elections as the means of assuring election integrity."

National Council for Research on Women: supports big government, high taxes, military spending cuts, increased social welfare spending, and the unrestricted right to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.

National Council of La Raza ("The Race") lobbies for racial preferences, bilingual education, stricter hate-crime laws, mass immigration, and amnesty for illegal aliens.

National Council of Women's Organizations: advocates high levels of spending for social welfare programs, and supports race and gender preferences for minorities and women in business and academia.

National Immigration Forum: Opposing the enforcement of present immigration laws

National Immigration Law Center: seeks to win unrestricted access to government-funded social welfare programs for illegal aliens.

National Lawyers Guild: This group promotes open borders; seeks to weaken America's intelligence-gathering agencies; condemns the Patriot Act as an assault on civil liberties; rejects capitalism as an unviable economic system; has rushed to the defense of convicted terrorists and their abettors; and generally opposes all U.S. foreign policy positions, just as it did during the Cold War when it sided with the Soviets.

National Organization for Women: advocates the unfettered right to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; seeks to "eradicate racism, sexism and homophobia" from American society; attacks Christianity and traditional religious values; and supports gender-based preferences for women.

National Partnership for Women and Families: supports race- and sex-based preferences in employment and education. It also advocates for the universal "right" of women to undergo taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand at any stage of pregnancy and for any reason.

National Priorities Project: supports government-mandated redistribution of wealth

National Public Radio (NPR): Founded in 1970 with 90 public radio stations as charter members, NPR is today a loose network of more than 750 U.S. radio stations across the country, many of which are based on college and university campuses. (source)

National Security Archive Fund: collects and publishes declassified documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act

National Women's Law Center: supports taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; lobbies against conservative judicial appointees; advocates increased welfare spending to help low-income mothers; and favors higher taxes for the purpose of generating more funds for such government programs as Medicaid, food stamps, welfare, foster care, health care, child-support enforcement, and student loans.

Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC): claims a membership of one million people.

New America Foundation: influence[s] public opinion on such topics as healthcare, environmentalism, energy policy, the Mideast conflict, global governance, and much more.

New Israel Fund: gives support to NGOs that regularly produce reports accusing Israel of human-rights violations and religious persecution.

NewsCorpWatch: established with the help of a $1 million George Soros grant to Media Matters.

Pacifica Foundation: This entity owns and operates Pacifica Radio, awash from its birth with the socialist-Marxist rhetoric of class warfare and hatred for capitalism.

Palestinian Center for Human Rights: investigates and documents what it views as Israeli human-rights violations against Palestinians.

Peace and Security Funders Group: give[s] money to leftist anti-war and environmentalist causes.

Peace Development Fund: In PDF's calculus, the United States needs a massive overhaul of its social and economic institutions. "Recently," explains PDF, "we have witnessed the negative effects of neo-liberalism and the globalization of capitalism, the de-industrialization of the U.S. and the growing gap between the rich and poor ..."

People for the American Way: This group opposes the Patriot Act, anti-terrorism measures generally, and the allegedly growing influence of the "religious right."

People Improving Communities Through Organizing: advance[s] the doctrines of the religious left.

Physicians for Human Rights: condemn[s] human rights violations.

Physicians for Social Responsibility: This is an anti-U.S.-military organization that also embraces the tenets of radical environmentalism.

Planned Parenthood: largest abortion provider in the United States and advocates taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.

Ploughshares Fund: opposes America's development of a missile defense system

Prepare New York: supported the proposed construction of a Muslim Community Center near Ground Zero in lower Manhattan

Presidential Climate Action Project: to create a new 21st-century economy, completely carbon-free and based largely on renewable energy

Prison Moratorium Project: working for the elimination of all prisons in the United States and the release of all inmates

Progressive Change Campaign Committee: works “to elect bold progressive candidates to federal office

Progressive States Network: to "pass progressive legislation in all fifty states by providing coordinated research and strategic advocacy tools to forward-thinking state legislators."

Project Vote: This is the voter-mobilization arm of the Soros-funded ACORN.

Pro Publica: aims to remedy this lacuna in news publishing by “expos[ing] abuses of power and betrayals of the public trust by government, business, and other institutions, using the moral force of investigative journalism to spur reform through the sustained spotlighting of wrongdoing.”

Proteus Fund: directs its philanthropy toward a number of radical leftwing organizations.

Public Citizen Foundation: seeks increased government intervention and litigation against corporations

Public Justice Center: engages in legislative and policy advocacy to promote "systemic change for the disenfranchised."

Rebuild and Renew America Now (a.k.a. Unity '09): Spearheaded by MoveOn.org and overseen by longtime activist Heather Booth, this coalition was formed to facilitate the passage of President Obama’s "historic" $3.5 trillion budget for fiscal year 2010.

Res Publica: specializes in “E-advocacy,” or web-based movement-building.

Secretary of State Project (2006): This project was launched in July 2006 as an independent "527" organization devoted to helping Democrats get elected to the office of Secretary of State in selected swing, or battleground, states.

Sentencing Project: advocates voting rights for felons.

Social Justice Leadership: seeks to transform an allegedly inequitable America into a "just society" by means of "a renewed social-justice movement."

Shadow Democratic Party: This is an elaborate network of non-profit activist groups organized by George Soros and others to mobilize resources -- money, get-out-the-vote drives, campaign advertising, and policy iniatives -- to elect Democratic candidates and guide the Democratic Party towards the left.

Sojourners: preaches radical leftwing politics

Southern Poverty Law Center: This organization monitors the activities of what it calls “hate groups” in the United States. It exaggerates the prevalence of white racism directed against American minorities.

State Voices: helps independent local activist groups in 22 states work collaboratively on a year-round basis, so as to maximize the impact of their efforts.

Think Progress: This Internet blog "pushes back, daily," by its own account, against its conservative targets, and seeks to transform "progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, grassroots organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other progressive leaders throughout the country and the world."

Thunder Road Group: coordinates strategy for the Media Fund, America Coming Together, and America Votes.

Tides Foundation and Tides Center: Tides is a major funder of the radical Left.

U.S. Public Interest Research Group: This is an umbrella organization of student groups that support leftist agendas.

Universal Healthcare Action Network: supports a single-payer health care system controlled by the federal government.

Urban Institute: favors socialized medicine, expansion of the federal welfare bureaucracy, and tax hikes for higher income-earners.

USAction Education Fund: too many activities to list

Voto Latino: This group seeks to mobilize Latin-Americans to become registered voters and political activists.

We Are America Alliance: This coalition promotes “increased civic participation by immigrants” in the American political process.

Working Families Party: help[s] push the Democratic Party toward the left.

World Organization Against Torture: This coalition works closely with groups that condemn Israeli security measures against Palestinian terrorism.

YWCA World Office, Switzerland: The YWCA opposes abstinence education; supports universal access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; and opposes school vouchers.

In addition to those organizations that are funded directly by George Soros and his Open Society Foundations (OSF), there are also numerous "secondary" or "indirect" affiliates of the Soros network. These include organizations which do not receive direct funding from Soros and OSF, but which are funded by one or more organizations that do.



http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

The Philanthropy of George Soros and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 2013.

Quote:

OSF’s declared objective is “to work to build vibrant and tolerant democracies whose governments are accountable and open to the participation of all people.” This is the basis for OSF’s often intrusive activities in both closed and democratic societies, including large scale funding of political NGOs.

According to OSF’s 2016 budget, $27.8 million is allocated to programs in the Middle East.

Funding of NGOs is entirely non-transparent. Annual reports do not provide names of NGO grantees or amounts transferred to individual groups. Details below were obtained through independent research by NGO Monitor, based on NGO reporting to the Israeli Registry of Non-Profits or information provided by the groups on their websites. (Note – all the Israeli and Palestinian NGOs also receive funding from European governments.)

Funding for political advocacy NGOs includes: Adalah (amount unknown), Al-Haq (amount unknown), Al Mezan (amount unknown) Breaking the Silence (NIS330,990 in 2015), B’Tselem (amount unknown), Center for Constitutional Rights ($495,000 in 2015), Mada al Carmel (amount unknown), American Friends Service Committee (amount unknown), Palestinian Center for Human Rights (amount unknown), Mossawa (amount unknown)

On August 14 2016, leaked documents from OSF were posted anonymously on the DC Leaks website. A number of these as yet unverified documents deal with OSF’s grants to political NGOs through its “Arab Regional Office (ARO) – Palestinian Citizens of Israel” department. Headed by Ammar Abu Zayyad, the ARO is one of a number of funding mechanisms for Israeli and Palestinian NGO’s in the OSF network.


http://www.ngo-monitor.org/funder/open_society_institute_osi_/

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 21, 2016 11:15 AM

REAVERFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Soros probably outspends the Kochs 100 to 1. It's not even close. He's beyond courrpt.


I'm still waiting for you to make any assertion that's even remotely true.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 21, 2016 11:31 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Soros probably outspends the Kochs 100 to 1. It's not even close. He's beyond courrpt.- RAPPY

I'm still waiting for you to make any assertion that's even remotely true. = REAVER



And YOUR assertion that the Koch Bros spent "a billion" dollars on politics, and that Soros is far, far behind them is also not even remotely true.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/koch-brothers-george-soros-fear/

The Kock Bros spend on lobbying, on organizations like ALEC. Soros spends on PACs and activist groups and media outlets. The Koch Bros spend nationally. Soros spends nationally, but he also spends internationally.

Erase from your worldview the concept that the Koch Bros are some sort of mysterious giant force of USA politics, and that George Soros is just a strange little old man who made his money by breaking the bank of England and precipitating the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and speculating against the Malaysian ringit.

The reality is that they both wield tremendous influence, the Koch Bros in the Republican Party and Soros in the Democratic party, and -in addition, because of his foreign background- Soros also has strong influence on Democratic foreign policy and on immigration issues.


--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 21, 2016 3:37 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

The FBI has acknowledged that it is investigating a massive breach of the Democratic National Committee's computers
so the FBI is investigating the hack to find out who did it

Quote:

which [some]sources
Who? Not the FBI

Quote:

and [some] experts
Who? I have read "some" experts say it was, and other experts (such as James Clapper) who tell people to stop hyperventilating. It is extremely difficult, according to MY expert, to determine who hacked what, as it is also extremely easy to spoof a source (i.e. put in information that points to another source, not the real one).

Quote:

say was likely the work of government hackers in Russia.
Uh huh.

Dood, you're a one-man McCarthy Commission, aren't you?

Stop hyperventilating.




They have said it has been traced back to a Russian government address because the addresses match another older hack they successfully tracked back.

____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 21, 2016 4:02 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

They have said it has been traced back to a Russian government address because the addresses match another older hack they successfully tracked back.
Ah, the infamous "they".

"They" who? An official statement by the FBI? Someone who is claiming to speak for the FBI? Someone else?

Links, please.

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 22, 2016 9:14 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Oh wow, look. The Troll has gone home.

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 22, 2016 4:39 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Oh wow, look. The Troll has gone home.



Actually it trolls and we are still waiting. When's the happy day comrade?

____________________________________________


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 22, 2016 8:52 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Ah, the infamous "they".

"They" who? An official statement by the FBI? Someone who is claiming to speak for the FBI? Someone else?
NOT the FBI, or anyone speaking for them. The only thing the FBI confirmed was that they were looking into it.

In fact James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence said this:

Responding to the DNC-Russian furor in a more blasé and introspective manner than might be expected, Clapper stepped in as a calm voice of reason stating that he was "somewhat taken aback by the hyperventilation on this” and that the US was in “reactionary mode” regarding cyber-attacks. Clapper further indicated he was ‘not ready’ to identify Russia as the hacker “I don’t think we are quite ready yet to make a call on attribution.”

Meanwhile, THUGGR, after being proven wrong over this Our FBI confirms the hacks of the DNC come from Russia (he completely fabricated that), has been reduced to insinuating that it's an official finding. It's not. That presumption came from Crowdstrike. But I couldn't find any other responsible source that echoed that assertion. Crowdstrike looks to be all alone out there with this.




Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 26, 2016 7:26 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Another USA group paid by Soros' "Open Society Foundation": Ultra Violet

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia should never interfere in any other nation's internal politics, meanwhile the USA and IMF is helping kill Venezuela
Sun, November 24, 2024 07:48 - 103 posts
Japanese Culture, S.Korea movies are now outselling American entertainment products
Sun, November 24, 2024 07:24 - 51 posts
The parallel internet is coming
Sun, November 24, 2024 06:04 - 180 posts
Giant UFOs caught on videotape
Sun, November 24, 2024 05:43 - 8 posts
California on the road to Venezuela
Sun, November 24, 2024 05:41 - 26 posts
Russia says 60 dead, 145 injured in concert hall raid; Islamic State group claims responsibility
Sun, November 24, 2024 05:37 - 71 posts
MAGA movement
Sun, November 24, 2024 05:04 - 14 posts
Will Your State Regain It's Representation Next Decade?
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:53 - 113 posts
Any Conservative Media Around?
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:44 - 170 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:40 - 42 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sun, November 24, 2024 01:01 - 18 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, November 23, 2024 23:46 - 4761 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL