Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Prominent Democrat Connected To Clintons Donated $675,000 To Campaign Of Deputy FBI Director's Wife
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-24/prominent-democrat-connected-
clintons-donated-675000-campaign-deputy-fbi-directors-w

Nothing to see here. Move along.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Apparently, THUGR, YOU hate freedom too!

---

Quote:

---

Apparently, THUGR, YOU hate freedom too! = SIGNY

Nope, just you= THUGR

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Apparently, THUGR, YOU hate freedom too! = SIGNY

Nope, just you= THUGR

---

So, you admit that you're a hater, that it's personal and that you're a 100% troll. That would be enough to boot you off many discussion boards.

---

Quote:

---

Nope, there is post after post here of you saying way worse to many others. All I said is that I don't like you. As for the troll handle, I'll let your many hatful [sic] threads speak to that.

---

Quote:

---

Last week, Jame O'keefe and Project Veritas Action potentially altered the course of the U.S. election, or at a minimum raised serious doubts about the practices of the Clinton campaign and the DNC, after releasing two undercover videos that revealed efforts of democrat operatives to incite violence at republican rallies and commit "mass voter fraud." While democrats have vehemently denied the authenticity of the videos, two democratic operatives, Robert Creamer and Scott Foval, have both been forced to resign over the allegations.

Many democrats made the rounds on various mainstream media outlets over the weekend in an attempt to debunk the Project Veritas videos. Unfortunately for them, O'Keefe fired back with warnings that part 3 of his multi-part series was forthcoming and would implicate Hillary Clinton directly.

Anything happens to me, there's a deadman's switch on Part III, which will be released Monday. @HillaryClinton and @donnabrazile implicated.
— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) October 21, 2016

Now, we have the 3rd installment of O'Keefe's videos which does seemingly reveal direct coordination between Hillary Clinton, Donna Brazile, Robert Creamer and Scott Foval to organize a smear campaign over Trump's failure to release his tax returns. Per Project Veritas:

Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations.

“In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.”

It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said:
“Don’t repeat that to anybody.”

Within the video both Clinton and Brazile are directly implicated by Creamer during the following exchange:

"The duck has to be an Americans United for Change entity. This had to do only with some problem between Donna Brazile and ABC, which is owned by Disney, because they were worried about a trademark issue. That's why. It's really silly.

We originally launched this duck because Hillary Clinton wants the duck.

In any case, so she really wanted this duck figure out there doing this stuff, so that was fine. So, we put all these ducks out there and got a lot of coverage. And Trump taxes. And then ABC/Disney went crazy because they thought our original slogan was 'Donald ducks his taxes, releasing his tax returns."

They said it was a trademark issue. It's not, but anyway, Donna Brazile had a connection with them and she didn't want to get sued. So we switched the ownership of the duck to Americans United for Change and now our signs say 'Trump ducks releasing his tax returns.' And we haven't had anymore trouble."

As Project Veritas points out, this direct coordination between Clinton, Brazile and Americans United For Change is a violation of federal election laws:

"The ducks on the ground are likely 'public communications' for purposes of the law. It's political activity opposing Trump, paid for by Americans United For Change funds but controlled by Clinton/her campaign."

---

Quote:

---

Please tell me you were drunk or high when you typed that.
Fwiw, I would classify you Kiki as a Useless Idiot.= GSTRING

---

Quote:

---

As we further reminded readers one month ago, CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante asked Mr. Obama when he learned about her private email system after his Saturday appearance in Selma, Alabama. "The same time everybody else learned it through news reports," the president told Plante. "The policy of my administration is to encourage transparency, which is why my emails, the BlackBerry I carry around, all those records are available and archived," Mr. Obama said. "I'm glad that Hillary's instructed that those emails about official business need to be disclosed."

Unfortunately, the "transparency" of the Obama administration was severely tarnished in late September, when in the FBI's interview notes with Huma Abedin released by the FBI it was first revealed that Obama had used a pseudonymous email account: "Once informed that the sender's name is believed to be pseudonym used by the president, Abedin exclaimed: 'How is this not classified?'" the report says. "Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president's use of a pseudonym and asked if she could have a copy of the email."

To be sure, this was not definitive evidence that Obama was aware of Hillary's email server, nor that there may have been collusion between the president and the Clinton campaign.

That changed today, however, when in the latest Podesta dump we learn that in an email from Cheryl Mills to John Podesta, the Clinton aide upon learning what Obama had just said...

I have some questions here pic.twitter.com/ufkeoZCx2m
— Katherine Miller (@katherinemiller) March 7, 2015

... countered with something quite stunning:

we need to clean this up - he has emails from her - they do not say state.gov

---

Quote:

---

How bad is her head? - John Podesta

--

Don't know - J Palmieri

--

She's going to stick to notes a little closer this am, still not perfect in her head- Human Abedin

---

Quote:

---

“But emails show that donors got special access to you. Those seeking grants for Haiti relief were considered separately from non-donors, and some of those donors got contracts, government contracts, taxpayer money,” Wallace said. “Can you really say that you kept your pledge to that Senate committee? And why isn’t what happened and what went on between you and the Clinton Foundation, why isn’t it what Mr. Trump calls pay-to-play?”

Clinton more or less avoided the question. She said that “everything I did as secretary of state was in furtherance of our country’s interests and our values. The State Department has said that.” Then she moved into a defense of the Clinton Foundation’s work. Wallace tried to get her back to the question at hand: “The specific question went to pay for play. Do you want to talk about that?” Clinton, for the most part, did not, saying “there’s no evidence.”

---

Quote:

---

You keep insulting T over and over and over because he exposed you and your Old Soviet agenda.

---

Quote:

---

“There is just no good answer,” Clinton aide Philippe Reines tells Podesta in a panicked mail from March 2015 in which they discuss Clinton’s reasoning for using a private email server.

The mail is sent to Podesta after New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman mailed Clinton aide Anne-Marie slaughter saying, “I have to say I am troubled by what I have read about what Hillary did.”

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Please tell me you were drunk or high when you typed that.
Fwiw, I would classify you Kiki as a Useless Idiot.= GSTRING

---

Musta struck a nerve, GSTRING. Why don't you PM your poor hapless friend once in a while, instead of letting him make a fool of himself over and over?

---

TOO FUNNY! What a hypocrite. Who's nerve has been struck??? You keep insulting T over and over and over because he exposed you and your Old Soviet agenda. You even had to remove some of your posts and apologize because even you thought you went too far. You are such a lying deceitful pos.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
"Burn This Email After You Read It"

---

How do you burn email? How do you put fingerprints on email? Do you know what a computer is?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:

---