Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Thanks DT. It is so not what she meant.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
6ix,

yeah, she pulled a stupid. I doubt she meant to say that. It's like Kelly Anne Conway and Bowling Green. But see above.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

She basically summed up with that little slip what I think about the MSM on both sides of the aisle.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
BTW, THUGR is a perfect demonstration of what is wrong with die-hard ideologues. He's all for the "rule of law" unless it cramps his style. I could point to both rightwing (supporting GWB's various unconstitutional acts) and liberal (supporting Obama's various unconstitutional acts) dismissal of the "rule of law".

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SOCKPUPPET:

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SOCKPUPPET:
SignyM, lol. Mika's always been Nazi, just like dear old dad.

DT, see you chose to play rock'em sock'em robots.

Jack, Nothing's worse than CNN

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:
Thanks DT. It is so not what she meant. If you/anyone need it explained you're long gone. "We're here to give you the truth, not Trump's version of it" which has been proven to be full of holes.
This reminds me of when SIGNYM found a picture of Yanokovich "doing a Nazi salute!" and she went mental, "see! see!" And then we found pictures of about 8 popular, public politicians caught during speeches with their hands up like nazi salutes. It's junior high school tactics dude.

---

Read it again G:

Quote:

---

BRZEZINSKI: Well, I think that the dangerous, you know, edges here are that he is trying to undermine the media and trying to make up his own facts. And it could be that while unemployment and the economy worsens, he could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think. And that, that is our job.

---

What from this statement, exactly, is your job Mika?

Undermining the Media?
Make up your own facts?
Undermine messaging?
Controlling exactly what people think?


What is there to take out of context G? I don't even see anything in her entire statement that could be seen as a good thing she could have been referring to. If you read Scarborough's comment right before it, I don't see anything she was referencing from what he said that she could have been talking about either.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SOCKPUPPET:

---

Don't wait up for SIG, I'm not. The truth or facts aren't coming.

---------------------

---

Quote:

---

To my knowledge I have not been told that we have that information.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Here is a very short Media versus Trump story. Do you think it is the Deep State destroying Trump little by little so that he can be eventually removed from office once his character has been sufficiently covered with mud? Or is it the White House spokesmen plus Trump lying as their standard operating procedure to glorify Trump's many wonderful, yet unreal, "achievements"?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
6ix,

yeah, she pulled a stupid. I doubt she meant to say that. It's like Kelly Anne Conway and Bowling Green. But see above.

---

Oh, I'm sure she didn't mean to say that. There was no taking that out of context though. She backed herself into a corner with that one.

She basically summed up with that little slip what I think about the MSM on both sides of the aisle. It can hardly be called news anymore. It's 95% opinion and 5% fact, if we're lucky. That's why depending on where you're getting quotes you can get two very different stories out of the exact same event.

---

Jack: Think it through instead of just reacting. SIGNYM obviously gets some clip of a 2nd banana on a 3rd rate tv morning show on an almost unwatched cable news channel that someone chopped up for effect. The clip is without any context. Was there laughing afterwards? Did someone ask her to clarify? Did some say "I think you meant.." and she agreed? Did she just misspeak? SIGNYM can't wait to post it here to prove... what? *Even if she meant it exactly as you think* that the MSM believe they are telling greater truths and Trump is lying? If you have been watching, that is the score - tell me how that's wrong. I love it when any news outlet points out the lies the president of the United States tells and then someone cries that it's biased for doing so. Huh? You don't think that's newsworthy? You don't want to know those things? Or are you just covering for him?

What she says she meant to say:
"Today I said it's the media's job to keep President Trump from making up his own facts, NOT that it's our job to control what people think."

Step back, think it through. It's the weakest of tea, dude. Funny thing, this will increase their ratings.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:

Second,

I don't think there is a Trump story. It's the Washington elite's immune system against any outsider. It would have been identical if it had been Bernie Sanders.

This sort of thing has been going on since at least the 60s. Kennedy, and Kennedy supporters even more so. Then the other Kennedys, RFK, JFK jr. And now Trump wants RFK jr.

But anyone who isn't a part of the machine is going to be attacked by it. Doesn't matter if Trump is a financial genius or a baboon, the result will be the same.

---

Quote:

---

Here is the story. The House of Representatives has refused to investigate either one of the two massive ongoing legal and ethical violations involving the Trump administration: President Trump’s

---

Quote:

---

opaque ties (financial and otherwise) to Russia, and his ongoing self-enrichment in office and violations of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

As far as the "emoluments" clause .... even our former State Attorney General and now Senator Kamala Harris, a staunch Democrat and one who knows a thing or two about the law, says that refers to bribes, not businesses interests (which Trump may not even have in Russia). If there's nothing illegal about it, why investigate? I agree that it looks stinky, but it's legal.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

trademark

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:

Probably not a big enough fish to fry.

Sinophobia is commonplace in american politics, it's easy to bat it about and get the upper hand in an argument, while pushing China around on the issue of Taiwan. The point of doing so I suspect is to keep China from increasing its hold over Taiwan by giving them tentative support, because opposition means war.

I have no doubt you're right, business interest in Taiwan, however, are huge. This is about trillions of dollars, not millions, I suspect.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
Lol. Oh, we're not so innocent. Milo ain't so jewish either. But it's all good.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

I've been called a Nazi 3 times in one day.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
Lol. Oh, we're not so innocent. Milo ain't so jewish either. But it's all good.

---

If Milo is Jewish at all I didn't even know it. I was referring to how frequently somebody gets called a Nazi on this board. It's been about a week now, but I've been called a Nazi 3 times in one day. When Sigs isn't being called a Russian Agent, that's the other word they like to call her too.

Stick around a while and you'll see what I'm talking about. ;)



Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:

Youtube video

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SOCKPUPPET:
Must be the Deep State.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SOCKPUPPET:

---

Don't wait up for SIG, I'm not. The truth or facts aren't coming.

---------------------

---

I wasn't being part of the argument, that's just a general commentary, courtesy of XKCD

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
BTW, THUGR is a perfect demonstration of what is wrong with die-hard ideologues. He's all for the "rule of law" unless it cramps his style. I could point to both rightwing (supporting GWB's various unconstitutional acts) and liberal (supporting Obama's various unconstitutional acts) dismissal of the "rule of law".

---

Great SIG, show me where I did that. Although I'm still waiting for you to produce the evidence of me being for all the hateful things you said.

---------------------

---

Quote:

---

When impeachment is discussed it is with the understanding something egregious has or will occur.- THUGR

THUGR you're just a fucking fascist. Most people wait until a crime has been committed BEFORE the trial. Good lord, you even post about "the rule of law" and then dismiss it completely! - SIGNY

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
Been there, seen it, done it myself. Milo has a jewish grandmother, which makes him nominally Jewish, under Nazi and Israeli law, but he's not a practicing Jew. It came up re: Breitbart and his position on zionism. He probably favors Israel over Islam on the gay rights angle, rather than on ancestry.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

When impeachment is discussed it is with the understanding something egregious has or will occur.- THUGR

THUGR you're just a fucking fascist. Most people wait until a crime has been committed BEFORE the trial. Good lord, you even post about "the rule of law" and then dismiss it completely! - SIGNY

---

Done

---

Quote:

---

When impeachment indictment is discussed FOR HILLARY it is with the understanding something egregious has or will occur.- THUGR

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:
... Crazy Teletubby Nazi Girl ...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

When impeachment indictment is discussed FOR HILLARY it is with the understanding something egregious has or will occur.- THUGR

---

Yep, I think we should indict Hillary for something she might do.

Shoe's on the other foot. How does it feel?

---

Quote:

---

Again you quote someone else ( in this case me ), and change the wording to suit you. It is proof of my repeated claims that you post information you know has been edited, therefore false. -THUGR

---

Quote:

---

Inquiry by C.I.A. Affirms It Spied on Senate Panel

An internal investigation by the C.I.A. has found that its officers penetrated a computer network used by the Senate Intelligence Committee in preparing its damning report on the C.I.A.’s detention and interrogation program.

The report by the agency’s inspector general also found that C.I.A. officers read the emails of the Senate investigators and sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department based on false information, according to a summary of findings made public on Thursday. One official with knowledge of the report’s conclusions said the investigation also discovered that the officers created a false online identity to gain access on more than one occasion to computers used by the committee staff.

The inspector general’s account of how the C.I.A. secretly monitored a congressional committee charged with supervising its activities touched off angry criticism from members of the Senate and amounted to vindication for Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, the committee’s Democratic chairwoman, who excoriated the C.I.A. in March when the agency’s monitoring of committee investigators became public.

A statement issued Thursday morning by a C.I.A. spokesman said that John O. Brennan, the agency’s director, had apologized to Ms. Feinstein and the committee’s ranking Republican, Senator Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, and would set up an internal accountability board to review the issue. The statement said that the board, which will be led by a former Democratic senator, Evan Bayh of Indiana, could recommend “potential disciplinary measures” and “steps to address systemic issues.”

---

Quote:

---

U.S. directs agents to cover up program used to investigate Americans

A secretive U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration unit is funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wiretaps, informants and a massive database of telephone records to authorities across the nation to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans.

Although these cases rarely involve national security issues, documents reviewed by Reuters show that law enforcement agents have been directed to conceal how such investigations truly begin - not only from defense lawyers but also sometimes from prosecutors and judges.

The undated documents show that federal agents are trained to "recreate" the investigative trail to effectively cover up where the information originated, a practice that some experts say violates a defendant's Constitutional right to a fair trial. If defendants don't know how an investigation began, they cannot know to ask to review potential sources of exculpatory evidence - information that could reveal entrapment, mistakes or biased witnesses....

The unit of the DEA that distributes the information is called the Special Operations Division, or SOD. Two dozen partner agencies comprise the unit, including the FBI, CIA, NSA, Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Homeland Security. It was created in 1994 to combat Latin American drug cartels and has grown from several dozen employees to several hundred.

---

Quote:

---

Secret Service laptop containing Trump Tower evacuation and floor plans stolen

A laptop with highly sensitive information was stolen from a Secret Service agent's car Thursday morning in Brooklyn and has not been found, according to two senior New York law enforcement officials.
The officials said the laptop, which was highly encrypted and contained floor plans and evacuation protocol for Trump Tower, cannot be traced or erased by officials remotely, leaving the information at risk of being discovered.
The agent described the incident as a compromise of national security, according to one of the officials.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So, the point about stealing the laptop: Of course, all intelligence agencies have access to Secret Service information. But now that that information has been let loose "into the wild" then ANYone can be accused of assassinating Trump or killing his family members. It creates "plausible deniability"

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So, the point about stealing the laptop: Of course, all intelligence agencies have access to Secret Service information. But now that that information has been let loose "into the wild" then ANYone can be accused of assassinating Trump or killing his family members. It creates "plausible deniability"

---

Oh shit, SIG is trying to plant the seed that the CIA stole the laptop, and is not free to kill Trump.

You truly are the dullest apple on the tree.

---------------------

SIG says I'm a deep state troll.oh me, oh my.

---

Right - was there any "Deep State" talk during the election? Nope! Now that they are closing in on Trump, they are in reverse gear trying to smear the US intelligence community. Sig is so transparent. Sadly, she realizes that such blatant hypocrisy carries very little downside on this board.

---

Quote:

---

Right - was there any "Deep State" talk during the election? Nope!

---

Quote:

---

Now that they are closing in on Trump

---

Quote:

---

Nope! When Comey revealed the Weiner emails (utter nothing) were you raising deep state objections? NOPE - GSTRING

---