Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
- probably because they cannot read, let alone think.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
A new book The Big Lie points out how Nazis were able to justify their practices and policies, merely by copying Democrats in America.

To expel citizens of lands that they wanted, and then enslave the remaining populace, they copied American practices towards Natives Americans, derived from Thomas Jefferson.

To justify targeting of Jews, they just copied the Democrat Laws supporting slavery, merely replacing the word Slave with Jew, derived from Andrew Jackson.

To justify extermination and eugenics, they merely copied the writings, policies and practices of left-wing radical extremist Margaret Sanger.


I guess the book comes out this fall. But it still won't cease the neverending denial of truth from the radical extremist left - probably because they cannot read, let alone think.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

I guess the book comes out this fall. But it still won't cease the neverending denial of truth from the radical extremist left - probably because they cannot read, let alone think.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

A question for the rest of us: what is it about the extremes that attract so many? To feel unique? important? to extract some kind of revenge from a "Society" that you feel marginalizes you? And: how do we counter act that impulse to use that avenue as a solution for X? How do yo make people feel important? Or are most of these people so anti-social, so fringe that there's no hope in any solution that comes from "Society?"

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Riverlove:

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
- probably because they cannot read, let alone think.

---

Oh, the irony.



Nazi's are ALWAYS CONSERVATIVES. What does 200 years ago mean AT ALL?? Bloody hell, you win the Idiot of the Internet for today...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:


A question for the rest of us: what is it about the extremes that attract so many?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:


... this shit-for-brains also wants to show the class how little he knows about history

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:


... this shit-for-brains also wants to show the class how little he knows about history

---

'Zactly...Republicans THEN had much more in common with today's Democrats than anyone. But then, most Americans don't know that. One in three also couldn't tell you that the Earth goes around then sun, let alone which direction.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Hey, all you liberals, I think you're missing the point.

Why did we destroy Afghanistan? Partly it was because they refused to turn over their guest (ObL) to the USA - although they WOULD have turned him over to the ICC, that wasn't good enough for us. Plus, the Taliban was in charge, and they treated females worse than donkeys. We needed to do something about that. When we were done, Afgahnistan was in far worse shape than when we started, and not only was the Taliban still in control of much of the countryside, ISIS reared its ugly head.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
I'm just wondering if this is the type of Democrat that you consider "today's democrat"?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Riverlove:

---

Priceless.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
I'm just wondering if this is the type of Democrat that you consider "today's democrat"?

---

1. When she first arrived on the political scene attitudes and values were different than today. It's like asking my grandma what she thinks. (She doesn't.)

2. I have never supported Hillary. The fact that she DIDN'T leave Bill says everything about her.

3. There is a vast difference in ideology within parties, picking out one person isn't much of an argument. I am referencing what positions the parties generally stand for. But you know that. One more excuse to knock Hillary makes your day.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:

I don't need an excuse. She did it to herself.

Don't pretend like you didn't vote for her.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Riverlove:

---

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

---

Priceless.

---

Not to mention totally wrong.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

I guess the book comes out this fall. But it still won't cease the neverending denial of truth from the radical extremist left - probably because they cannot read, let alone think.

---

How about this truth? Backed by Police Unions, Legislators Stand By Laws to Protect Drivers Who Kill Protesters. The Legislators are all Republican. None are Democrats. If the Nazis had known, they would have copied the Republicans' law.

https://theintercept.com/2017/08/14/backed-by-police-unions-legislator
s-standby-laws-to-protect-drivers-who-kill-protesters/

In the aftermath of the murder of activist Heather Heyer in Charlottesville, Virginia, state legislators who had previously pushed to shield drivers who killed protesters with a moving vehicle are largely standing by their various efforts, arguing that their legislation would not have applied in this weekend’s attack.

Before the killing on Saturday, a swath of bills had been proposed around the country, largely in the South and primarily in response to Black Lives Matter and Dakota Access Pipeline related protests. The bills targeted leftist demonstrators who have increasingly shut down traffic by blocking roads and highways to bring attention to their cause.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
A new book The Big Lie points out how Nazis were able to justify their practices and policies, merely by copying Democrats in America.

---

Good title for that "book."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
There aren't any Nazis anymore.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Oh, and if you don't understand why Obama is NOT LIKE HITLER, you need to watch your entire family be gassed to death. It kinda has a way of making people figure out who the bad people are...

---

Seriously. You LIKE people who march around with torches and swastikas and terrorize and murder people? WTF?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
There aren't any Nazis anymore.

---

Really? What do you call people who march around with Nazi flags and do Nazi salutes, and terrorize and murder people who aren't like them? Patriots?

---

Quote:

---

You piece of shit.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Oh, and if you don't understand why Obama is NOT LIKE HITLER, you need to watch your entire family be gassed to death. It kinda has a way of making people figure out who the bad people are...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Oh, and if you don't understand why Obama is NOT LIKE HITLER, you need to watch your entire family be gassed to death. It kinda has a way of making people figure out who the bad people are...

---

Seriously. You LIKE people who march around with torches and swastikas and terrorize and murder people? WTF?

---

I don't think among the sane people from either side of the spectrum that the irony of both of your statements is lost...

Everytime you both throw that word Nazi around to people who aren't actually Nazis you're not only diminishing the meaning of the word, but you're insulting the survivors, their families and everybody who died in actual concentration camps at the hands of actual Nazis.

Grow the fuck up.

EDITED TO ADD:

BTW... I quoted your deleted post to Wish that highlights your lack of reading comprehension. If anybody is curious why reaverfan posted twice, it wasn't an accidental double post. (See above)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Oh, and if you don't understand why Obama is NOT LIKE HITLER, you need to watch your entire family be gassed to death. It kinda has a way of making people figure out who the bad people are...

---

Under Yanukovich/ Qaddafi/ Assad must go! Obama supported this

Of course, there are no videos of drone strikes because those are secret. Just because it's far away and someone else doesn't make it any less tragic. War is hell, but who started and funded it?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
This whole thread is just one big *facepalm.

Morons fighting over who wants to kill who, which party does or said what 150 years ago. Or thirty years ago. Like it fucking matters right here and now. Like ANYTHING would justify ANYONE driving a car into a group of ANY people.

Nazi's are bad, M'kay. If you don't get THAT at least, the hell with you.

As usual, this planet would be a whole lot better without most humans on it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:
A question for the rest of us: what is it about the extremes that attract so many? To feel unique? important? to extract some kind of revenge from a "Society" that you feel marginalizes you? And: how do we counter act that impulse to use that avenue as a solution for X? How do yo make people feel important? Or are most of these people so anti-social, so fringe that there's no hope in any solution that comes from "Society?"

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

I guess the book comes out this fall. But it still won't cease the neverending denial of truth from the radical extremist left - probably because they cannot read, let alone think.

---

How about this truth? Backed by Police Unions, Legislators Stand By Laws to Protect Drivers Who Kill Protesters. The Legislators are all Republican. None are Democrats. If the Nazis had known, they would have copied the Republicans' law.

https://theintercept.com/2017/08/14/backed-by-police-unions-legislator
s-standby-laws-to-protect-drivers-who-kill-protesters/

In the aftermath of the murder of activist Heather Heyer in Charlottesville, Virginia, state legislators who had previously pushed to shield drivers who killed protesters with a moving vehicle are largely standing by their various efforts, arguing that their legislation would not have applied in this weekend’s attack.

Before the killing on Saturday, a swath of bills had been proposed around the country, largely in the South and primarily in response to Black Lives Matter and Dakota Access Pipeline related protests. The bills targeted leftist demonstrators who have increasingly shut down traffic by blocking roads and highways to bring attention to their cause.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
This whole thread is just one big *facepalm.

Morons fighting over who wants to kill who, which party does or said what 150 years ago. Or thirty years ago. Like it fucking matters right here and now. Like ANYTHING would justify ANYONE driving a car into a group of ANY people.

Nazi's are bad, M'kay. If you don't get THAT at least, the hell with you.

As usual, this planet would be a whole lot better without most humans on it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Hey, all you liberals, I think you're missing the point.

Why did we destroy Afghanistan? Partly it was because they refused to turn over their guest (ObL) to the USA - although they WOULD have turned him over to the ICC, that wasn't good enough for us. Plus, the Taliban was in charge, and they treated females worse than donkeys. We needed to do something about that. When we were done, Afgahnistan was in far worse shape than when we started, and not only was the Taliban still in control of much of the countryside, ISIS reared its ugly head.

---

Your facts are wrong, Signym. Your conclusion is wrong.

Afghanistan could not turn over Osama bin Laden because he was in Pakistan and Bush could not leave Afghanistan until he found bin Laden is the place he was not. Everything wrong with that war follows from Bush being wrong about why he continued to fight it. Bush was doomed to fail because his ambitions, once he could not find bid Laden, grew too big and too vague. Bush didn't send enough troops to turn all the Afghan men into either well behaved gentlemen or corpses.

Quote:

---

Why did we destroy Iraq? Well, "Saddam had WMD" and posed a major security risk to ... the USA, I guess ... Plus yanno he was a terrible dictator. So it was worth killing somewhere between 200,000- 1,000,000 civilians and leaving the nation partially occupied by ISIS and riven with ethnic hatred just to depose a dictator and get rid of phantom WMD.

---

Rumsfeld estimated the war would be cheap. Army Chief of Staff Eric Shinseki was fired when he testified that was flat wrong.
www.cnn.com/2013/03/20/opinion/mills-truth-teller-iraq/index.html
V.P. Cheney estimated that Halliburton could steal Iraq oil.
Bush estimated that he would be hailed as the Great Liberator of Iraq.

Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Bush are delusional Republicans. It was no surprise that their war was poorly planned, executed at enormous cost, and failed to live up to their delusions.
www.usnews.com/news/blogs/press-past/2013/03/20/the-underestimated-cos
ts-and-price-tag-of-the-iraq-war

Quote:

---

Why did we destroy Libya? Well, Qaddafi was a terrible dictator, and despite the fact that the standard of living in Libya was VASTLY superior to any other nation in Africa, Qaddafi had to "massacre his own people" in order to stay in power, which somehow required not only a NATO no-fly zone but eventual bombing of the entire civilian space and arming radicalized jihadists to topple the leader. But we managed to take down Qaddafi and the price was only about 10,000 dead, a nation crawling with jihadist terrorists, and a catastrophic drop in living standards.

---

Having ruled for merely 42 years, Muammar Gaddafi botched the transfer of power to his son. After decades of compromises with Gaddafi, the many tribal factions that he had kept under control had lost patience with Gaddafi's endless promises. The tribes wanted all control for themselves, sharing nothing with any other tribe. They could not agree on how to share Libya, but they could agree on one thing: to kill Gaddafi.

Signym, you didn't get enough facts right about these three countries. No surprise that your three explanations are wrong. But I have to complement your style. You show high confidence in yourself and you are very articulate.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:




You and me... at the end of the day we don't know shit about shit.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:




You and me... at the end of the day we don't know shit about shit.

---

Speak for yourself, Nazi boy. I know plenty.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Supporting Nazis speaks volumes about the mentality of people on the far right.


SGG

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6stringJoker:

Hey SGG.

I consider you one of the rational people on this board.

I would like you to REALLY read these two threads that are being heavily posted on and think for yourself here, rather than jumping on board the Wishy/Reaverfan hate train.

---

Quote:

---

This whole thread is just one big *facepalm.

Morons fighting over who wants to kill who, which party does or said what 150 years ago. Or thirty years ago. Like it fucking matters right here and now. Like ANYTHING would justify ANYONE driving a car into a group of ANY people.
Nazi's are bad, M'kay. If you don't get THAT at least, the hell with you.
As usual, this planet would be a whole lot better without most humans on it. - WISHY

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Hey, all you liberals, I think you're missing the point.

Why did we destroy Afghanistan? Partly it was because they refused to turn over their guest (ObL) to the USA - although they WOULD have turned him over to the ICC, that wasn't good enough for us. Plus, the Taliban was in charge, and they treated females worse than donkeys. We needed to do something about that. When we were done, Afgahnistan was in far worse shape than when we started, and not only was the Taliban still in control of much of the countryside, ISIS reared its ugly head.

---

Your facts are wrong, Signym. Your conclusion is wrong.

Afghanistan could not turn over Osama bin Laden because he was in Pakistan and Bush could not leave Afghanistan until he found bin Laden is the place he was not. Everything wrong with that war follows from Bush being wrong about why he continued to fight it. Bush was doomed to fail because his ambitions, once he could not find bid Laden, grew too big and too vague. Bush didn't send enough troops to turn all the Afghan men into either well behaved gentlemen or corpses.

Quote:

---

Why did we destroy Iraq? Well, "Saddam had WMD" and posed a major security risk to ... the USA, I guess ... Plus yanno he was a terrible dictator. So it was worth killing somewhere between 200,000- 1,000,000 civilians and leaving the nation partially occupied by ISIS and riven with ethnic hatred just to depose a dictator and get rid of phantom WMD.

---

Rumsfeld estimated the war would be cheap. Army Chief of Staff Eric Shinseki was fired when he testified that was flat wrong.
www.cnn.com/2013/03/20/opinion/mills-truth-teller-iraq/index.html
V.P. Cheney estimated that Halliburton could steal Iraq oil.
Bush estimated that he would be hailed as the Great Liberator of Iraq.

Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Bush are delusional Republicans. It was no surprise that their war was poorly planned, executed at enormous cost, and failed to live up to their delusions.
www.usnews.com/news/blogs/press-past/2013/03/20/the-underestimated-cos
ts-and-price-tag-of-the-iraq-war

Quote:

---

Why did we destroy Libya? Well, Qaddafi was a terrible dictator, and despite the fact that the standard of living in Libya was VASTLY superior to any other nation in Africa, Qaddafi had to "massacre his own people" in order to stay in power, which somehow required not only a NATO no-fly zone but eventual bombing of the entire civilian space and arming radicalized jihadists to topple the leader. But we managed to take down Qaddafi and the price was only about 10,000 dead, a nation crawling with jihadist terrorists, and a catastrophic drop in living standards.

---

Having ruled for merely 42 years, Muammar Gaddafi botched the transfer of power to his son. After decades of compromises with Gaddafi, the many tribal factions that he had kept under control had lost patience with Gaddafi's endless promises. The tribes wanted all control for themselves, sharing nothing with any other tribe. They could not agree on how to share Libya, but they could agree on one thing: to kill Gaddafi.

Signym, you didn't get enough facts right about these three countries. No surprise that your three explanations are wrong. But I have to complement your style. You show high confidence in yourself and you are very articulate.

---

Why are Nazis always so poorly educated, and get everything wrong? Illiterate AND terrorists. Wow.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

This whole thread is just one big *facepalm.

Morons fighting over who wants to kill who, which party does or said what 150 years ago. Or thirty years ago. Like it fucking matters right here and now. Like ANYTHING would justify ANYONE driving a car into a group of ANY people.
Nazi's are bad, M'kay. If you don't get THAT at least, the hell with you.
As usual, this planet would be a whole lot better without most humans on it. - WISHY

---

Ok, so can we generalize that to: It's bad if ANYONE drives a car into a group pf people, whether they are Nazis, radical jihadists, militant Hindus, or anyone else? If fact, can we make that an even MORE general statement, that killing or injuring anyone for a political cause is bad???

Yup, I think we can.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
This whole thread is just one big *facepalm.

Morons fighting over who wants to kill who, which party does or said what 150 years ago. Or thirty years ago. Like it fucking matters right here and now. Like ANYTHING would justify ANYONE driving a car into a group of ANY people.

Nazi's are bad, M'kay. If you don't get THAT at least, the hell with you.

As usual, this planet would be a whole lot better without most humans on it.

---

I am not sure I have seen your outrage over the doctors prescribing these psychotropic drugs to this guy or others. When these doctors are held responsible and thrown in prison for these deaths then we'll have started to make progress.

https://breggin.com

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
This whole thread is just one big *facepalm.

Morons fighting over who wants to kill who, which party does or said what 150 years ago. Or thirty years ago. Like it fucking matters right here and now. Like ANYTHING would justify ANYONE driving a car into a group of ANY people.

Nazi's are bad, M'kay. If you don't get THAT at least, the hell with you.

As usual, this planet would be a whole lot better without most humans on it.

---

I am not sure I have seen your outrage over the doctors prescribing these psychotropic drugs to this guy or others. When these doctors are held responsible and thrown in prison for these deaths then we'll have started to make progress.

https://breggin.com

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I also neglected to mention the Anti-Semitic actions of Democraps such as FDR when he sent back to Europe Jewish refugees from Nazis, aboard SS St Louis.
At least 250 of them died as a result.

https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005267

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27373131

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/us-government-turned-away-thousa
nds-jewish-refugees-fearing-they-were-nazi-spies-180957324/

---