Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
It's EKES, not eeks.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
This was not an election. He was running unopposed because no serious candidate is ever allowed to challenge him. As soon as one starts to gain momentuem he is thrown into jail.

The Russian people know this so they don't get enthusiastic about voting. Employers had to make their employees leave work to go vote. They had a huge fish and rice sale to entice people to go to the polls.

Again, this was a joke not an election.


T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
"Putin eeks out re-election win with 105% of vote"

Somehow....EEEEEK is far more appropriate than eke.

This planet is such a joke.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Not very impressive.
I remember Libtard Wards getting 141%, 120%, 124%, 116% pretty regularly.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Not very impressive.
I remember Libtard Wards getting 141%, 120%, 124%, 116% pretty regularly.

---

You remember wrong

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Not very impressive.
I remember Libtard Wards getting 141%, 120%, 124%, 116% pretty regularly.

---

You remember wrong, which is a sign of senility and dementia.
www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article166187232
.html
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/the-conversation/sd-california-mo
re-voters-than-eligible-adults-claim-20170809-htmlstory.html

In Baytown, every year I keep getting voter registration cards for the house-owners from before 2013 and they moved to Austin. The next owner, in 2014, gets her voter registration card, but she has been dead for 3.5 years. That is 3 inactive GOP voters for one house in a Republican controlled city. The GOP controlled Judicial Watch is bitching about inactive voters in Democratic Party controlled cities and using inactive voter counts to claim that the Democratic Party is stealing elections. All Judicial Watch's math proved is that Judicial Watch doesn't understand math or voting registration. Los Angeles County (libtard country) has a registration rate of 112 percent, for example, or Stanislaus County (Modesto CA) has a registration rate of only 102 percent. Like many important things, voting registration is a halfass process in the USA. Unsurprisingly, American elections are halfass, too, despite the billions spent on making voting a sensible, reasonable process. And then there is Russia, where Putin's people stuff the ballot box.


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Not very impressive.
I remember Libtard Wards getting 141%, 120%, 124%, 116% pretty regularly.

---

You remember wrong, which is a sign of senility and dementia.
www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article166187232
.html
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/the-conversation/sd-california-mo
re-voters-than-eligible-adults-claim-20170809-htmlstory.html

In Baytown, every year I keep getting voter registration cards for the house-owners from before 2013 and they moved to Austin. The next owner, in 2014, gets her voter registration card, but she has been dead for 3.5 years. That is 3 inactive GOP voters for one house in a Republican controlled city. The GOP controlled Judicial Watch is bitching about inactive voters in Democratic Party controlled cities and using inactive voter counts to claim that the Democratic Party is stealing elections. All Judicial Watch's math proved is that Judicial Watch doesn't understand math or voting registration. Los Angeles County (libtard country) has a registration rate of 112 percent, for example, or Stanislaus County (Modesto CA) has a registration rate of only 102 percent. Like many important things, voting registration is a halfass process in the USA. Unsurprisingly, American elections are halfass, too, despite the billions spent on making voting a sensible, reasonable process. And then there is Russia, where Putin's people stuff the ballot box.

---

To JSF and Second,

In either case (Republican or Democrat), you wouldn't get a number of over 100% when dead people voted. The only reason that those votes counted in the first place is because even though the people are dead they are still valid on the voter rolls until after the SSA death list is merged with it. Only in hindsight, after this purge takes place, could there be a vote of more than 100%.

Large scale, since so many registered voters chose to stay home, these numbers would never be apparent. However, if one did investigate smaller wards with all of this information they could probably find examples of this happening.

The question is how does a civilian get this information? The answer is probably "they don't".

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Not very impressive.
I remember Libtard Wards getting 141%, 120%, 124%, 116% pretty regularly.

---

You remember wrong, which is a sign of senility and dementia.
www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article166187232
.html
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/the-conversation/sd-california-mo
re-voters-than-eligible-adults-claim-20170809-htmlstory.html

In Baytown, every year I keep getting voter registration cards for the house-owners from before 2013 and they moved to Austin. The next owner, in 2014, gets her voter registration card, but she has been dead for 3.5 years. That is 3 inactive GOP voters for one house in a Republican controlled city. The GOP controlled Judicial Watch is bitching about inactive voters in Democratic Party controlled cities and using inactive voter counts to claim that the Democratic Party is stealing elections. All Judicial Watch's math proved is that Judicial Watch doesn't understand math or voting registration. Los Angeles County (libtard country) has a registration rate of 112 percent, for example, or Stanislaus County (Modesto CA) has a registration rate of only 102 percent. Like many important things, voting registration is a halfass process in the USA. Unsurprisingly, American elections are halfass, too, despite the billions spent on making voting a sensible, reasonable process. And then there is Russia, where Putin's people stuff the ballot box.

---

To JSF and Second,

In either case (Republican or Democrat), you wouldn't get a number of over 100% when dead people voted. The only reason that those votes counted in the first place is because even though the people are dead they are still valid on the voter rolls until after the SSA death list is merged with it. Only in hindsight, after this purge takes place, could there be a vote of more than 100%.

Large scale, since so many registered voters chose to stay home, these numbers would never be apparent. However, if one did investigate smaller wards with all of this information they could probably find examples of this happening.

The question is how does a civilian get this information? The answer is probably "they don't".

---

Civilians are legally permitted to view published newspapers.
This data and percentage figures were usually published 2 days after Election Day. Not enough time for your Libtard delusion excuses to apply. Did you think that Criminal Democraps are going to abide selected laws that you choose?

If you have a building with 5 legally eligible voters and 6 votes are tallied from within that building, the voter turnout is 120%. If 7 ballots are tallied, the turnout is 140%.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Not very impressive.
I remember Libtard Wards getting 141%, 120%, 124%, 116% pretty regularly.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Amidst rumor of election manipulation from Trump Campaign and ballet box stuffing by invisible immigrants, Vladimir Putin "Puttie" wins a 4th term - but who's counting?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
You have a fantastic memory Jewels. Care to share?


SGG

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Not very impressive.
I remember Libtard Wards getting 141%, 120%, 124%, 116% pretty regularly.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Not very impressive.
I remember Libtard Wards getting 141%, 120%, 124%, 116% pretty regularly.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Not very impressive.
I remember Libtard Wards getting 141%, 120%, 124%, 116% pretty regularly.

---

You remember wrong

---

You are wrong. Voting Wards are practically neighborhoods, a matter of how many blocks. Those are numbers the Libtards boast, and were printed in the Libtard paper. Only the Libtard Wards boasted those numbers, the sensible Wards posted numbers under 100%.

Dead voters Voting in alphabetical order, early, often, and in multiple Booths is how you get higher voter turnout. Excess voter registrations unattached to a resultant VOTER would lower the voters turnout figure.

You might get your senility and dementia looked at. But how to differentiate from common Libtardism? No difference.

---