Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
JSF ... THUGR has an obsession and he will shit up every thread possible with his endless screeching and hyperventilation about RUSSIA!!! Just ignore him.

Thank you for digging up those facts about the "investigation team"; that kind of info is hard to come by.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
That was a pretty good summary of stuff I've already read, and a lot of stuff I've never seen before.

THANKS! JSF.

So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

More info will be posted here.

---

OK...


T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Updated, with a fresh start.

---

And it's a good one. Good for you buddy...


T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

2

---

Wow, this is everywhere I look. What do you think. I guess we'll learn more next Sunday.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, I know I have not finished compiling the data.

I'm beginning to consider if this is a never-ending rats nest.

So far no evidence that Mueller or Rosenstein have allowed any fair, balanced, unbiased nonpartisan professionals to get near the Witch Hunt.
Perhaps more accurately, nobody is considered unless they are first proven to be highly biased against Trump and/or GOP.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, I know I have not finished compiling the data.

I'm beginning to consider if this is a never-ending rats nest.

So far no evidence that Mueller or Rosenstein have allowed any fair, balanced, unbiased nonpartisan professionals to get near the Witch Hunt.
Perhaps more accurately, nobody is considered unless they are first proven to be highly biased against Trump and/or GOP.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, I know I have not finished compiling the data.

I'm beginning to consider if this is a never-ending rats nest.

So far no evidence that Mueller or Rosenstein have allowed any fair, balanced, unbiased nonpartisan professionals to get near the Witch Hunt.
Perhaps more accurately, nobody is considered unless they are first proven to be highly biased against Trump and/or GOP.

---

So what you're saying is it would be more fair if they were all pro-Trump Republicans.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
In wake of McCabe firing, Trump lawyer calls for end to Mueller's probe

March 17 (UPI) -- A lawyer for President Donald Trump on Saturday said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein should end Robert Mueller's investigation into whether Trump's campaign had ties with Russia.

John Dowd made the statement after Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, one of the first officials at the bureau to scrutinize possible links between the Trump team and Russian election meddling.

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2018/03/17/In-wake-of-McCabe-firing-Tr
ump-lawyer-calls-for-end-to-Muellers-probe/6791521309116/

Exciting isn't it?

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
In wake of McCabe firing, Trump lawyer calls for end to Mueller's probe

March 17 (UPI) -- A lawyer for President Donald Trump on Saturday said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein should end Robert Mueller's investigation into whether Trump's campaign had ties with Russia.

John Dowd made the statement after Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, one of the first officials at the bureau to scrutinize possible links between the Trump team and Russian election meddling.

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2018/03/17/In-wake-of-McCabe-firing-Tr
ump-lawyer-calls-for-end-to-Muellers-probe/6791521309116/

Exciting isn't it?

T

---

You got that thrill crawling up your leg?
Didn't MSM report that Rosenstein or Wray fired McCabe?

For some reason you neglected to mention that Rosenstein clearly stated that expansion of the probe beyond Trump-Russia-Collusion must be approved by him. Certainly the reverse should be true.

---

Clearly you don't have a command of the facts. And as just happened in a different thread, second showed how you make shit up.


T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Rosenstein has effectively annointed himself defacto AG, outside of his Constitutional Authority.

So nothing Mueller has Investigated, outside of nonexistent Trump-Russia Collusion, or brought charges for (none of which is related to Trump-Russia Collusion) has any merit or Authority.

Sessions had recused himself specifically from the Trump-Russia Collusion Investigation because he had been an advisor and surrogate for the 2016 Trump Campaign. He did not recuse himself from any tax or IRS matter, or any business dealings from before the campaign, or any misstatements uttered by subordinates, or anything that the SC has filed charges about, or convened Grand Juries about.

Did Sessions recuse himself from legal matters of Mike Cohen unrelated to Trump-Russia Collusion? Or have Mueller and Rosenstein become unmoored from their Authority, granting themselves Unconstitutional Powers?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Did Sessions recuse himself from legal matters of Mike Cohen, unrelated to Trump-Russia Collusion? Or have Mueller and Rosenstein become unmoored from their Authority, granting themselves Unconstitutional Powers?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Did Sessions recuse himself from legal matters of Mike Cohen, unrelated to Trump-Russia Collusion? Or have Mueller and Rosenstein become unmoored from their Authority, granting themselves Unconstitutional Powers?

---

It’s not easy to search a practicing lawyer’s office....blah blah blah.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Did Sessions recuse himself from legal matters of Mike Cohen, unrelated to Trump-Russia Collusion? Or have Mueller and Rosenstein become unmoored from their Authority, granting themselves Unconstitutional Powers?

---

It’s not easy to search a practicing lawyer’s office....blah blah blah.

---

Why avert the question? You haven't discovered a suitable spin yet?

Yet more diversions to other topics are not substitutes for an answer.

Did Sessions recuse himself? Or did Sessions authorize this?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Of the many valid points absent from the Libtard discussion, I have not recalled oft mention of the Jan 2000 Clinton DoJ Constitutional Brief regarding pursuit of indictment against a sitting President.

The Clinton Libtards detailed why this should not be happening. This is the most recent and current legal position of the US Government.

Are Rosenstein, Mueller, and the other Libtards hell bent on destroying or circumventing the Constitution?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Of the many valid points absent from the Libtard discussion, I have not recalled oft mention of the Jan 2000 Clinton DoJ Constitutional Brief regarding pursuit of indictment against a sitting President.

The Clinton Libtards detailed why this should not be happening. This is the most recent and current legal position of the US Government.

Are Rosenstein, Mueller, and the other Libtards hell bent on destroying or circumventing the Constitution?

---

I had hoped to locate a copy of the report or memorandum, but so far it has proven elusive.

I only found this so far:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/insider/2016/11/09/can-a-president-trump-
be-prosecuted-based-upon-allegations-of-past-misconduct/#79d7a940491b

---

Quote:

---

In 1973, the Department concluded that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions. We have been asked to summarize and review the analysis provided in support of that conclusion, and to consider whether any subsequent developments in the law lead us today to reconsider and modify or disavow that determination.1 We believe that the conclusion reached by the Department in 1973 still represents the best interpretation of the Constitution.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2000/10/31/op
-olc-v024-p0222_0.pdf

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
For those who need a teaser to click on the link, here is the opening paragraph:

Quote:

---

In 1973, the Department concluded that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions. We have been asked to summarize and review the analysis provided in support of that conclusion, and to consider whether any subsequent developments in the law lead us today to reconsider and modify or disavow that determination.1 We believe that the conclusion reached by the Department in 1973 still represents the best interpretation of the Constitution.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2000/10/31/op
-olc-v024-p0222_0.pdf

---

So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I heard about an article which explained how CIA Director Brennan was the ringmaster of this whole circus.

I cannot access the story right now, but I think it was by Michael Doran. The story may have been from 13 March 2018. "The Real Collusion Story" sounds like the story, but I cannot confirm.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Finally, the House has drafted Articles of Impeachment.
Against Rod Rosenstein.

What took them so long?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Apparently there is a book covering a lot of this, titled The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Peripheral to this topic, but MSM reported Trump's approval rating as 51%, and now even Shifty Schiff is pleading for Libtards and other Democraps to SHUT UP about Impeachment, Indictment, and Investigation.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Peripheral to this topic, but MSM reported Trump's approval rating as 51%, and now even Shifty Schiff is pleading for Libtards and other Democraps to SHUT UP about Impeachment, Indictment, and Investigation.

---

A good surgeon won’t give false hope to a patient with two inoperable tumors. Trump is brain cancer. Pence is liver cancer. If one doesn’t kill, the other will. The Democrats recommend hospice care and large doses of morphine for this White House.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Apparently today Federal Judge T.S. Ellis declared the Mueller team are plainly liars.

Maybe we should refer to them as The Muelliar Team.

Sounds like the Judge might throw out all of the Manafort non-case.

---