CNN Has Fewer Viewers Than The Food Network by JEWELSTAITEFAN

And still about a quarter of Fox News Channel viewership.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 12:56 PM

Bunch of idiots without a real life watching either of them.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 1:04 PM

Old white shut-ins watch Faux to reinforce their confirmation bias.

The rest of us have shit to do.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 1:36 PM

lol...

burning trash cans and wet dreams about punching "Nazis" while dressing up like Kick Ass.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 3:30 PM

... stay crunchy...

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And still about a quarter of Fox News Channel viewership.

Do you have an Internet connection? It's been a tradition and general courtesy around here (what's left of that) to provide links for the source of such profound statements.
If your statement is factual (and I have no reason to believe it isn't) that just tells you a lot about the average "I just don't give a sh*t" citizen/non-voter in this country.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 8:57 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And still about a quarter of Fox News Channel viewership.

Do you have an Internet connection? It's been a tradition and general courtesy around here (what's left of that) to provide links for the source of such profound statements.

I'm assuming it's this article here: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/cnn-gets-served-failing-network-lose
s-to-food-network-in-latest-ratings/

Quote:
According to the numbers compiled by Nielsen Media Research, CNN’s prime-time programming attracted an average viewership of 758,000 from June 18-24 for the 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. (Eastern) time period.

Among cable news networks, that number is good for third — which doesn’t sound too bad until you remember there are only three cable news networks.

And the difference between the three wasn’t even close. Fox News Channel was tops among all cable channels with an average of just over 2 million prime-time viewers for the week. MSNBC was in second with 1.49 million.

More like 1/3rd than 1/4.

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
If your statement is factual (and I have no reason to believe it isn't) that just tells you a lot about the average "I just don't give a sh*t" citizen/non-voter in this country.

How does this tell us "a lot about the average "I just don't give a sh*t" citizen/non-voter in this country"?

I'd argue that it only tells us that the average citizen doesn't give a shit. Which is something I've been saying here for well over a year.

I think the only information that can be inferred here other than the fact that an overwhelming majority of the people don't give a shit, is that of those that do, a majority would rather get their "news" from right wing shills than left wing shills.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 9:06 PM

CNN just barely edges out the number of transgender people in America in average prime time viewership.

https://www.theodysseyonline.com/marginalized-transgender-community

Quote:
In August 2015, the estimated number of transgender individuals in the United States was above 700,000, but almost 75 percent of them claimed to hide their gender or transition to avoid discrimination.

I hope that puts things into a little perspective for everyone here.

The guestimated percentage of transgendered people (assuming only 300 million people in the country) is around 0.23%.

The percentage of average people who watch CNN in prime time is around 0.25%

The percentage of average people who watch FOX news in prime time is around 0.66%

Hell... y'all should probably apply for minority status. I think you have a case.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 9:55 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:

Old white shut-ins watch Faux to reinforce their confirmation bias.

The rest of us have shit to do.

Fox viewers watch and get their news from Fox. CNN and MSNBC viewers not only watch both networks but also get their news from CBS, ABC, NBC, CSPAN, CNBC, BBC, Bloomberg news, Business Insider and so on and so on. All according to Trump and his minions are fake news. Get the point?

And REAVERFAN, I'm an old white guy. Many of us are now and always have been behind all the good changes that have occurred in this country over the years. Don't be one of those people who always categorize whits as all being the same.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, June 28, 2018 1:02 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And still about a quarter of Fox News Channel viewership.

Do you have an Internet connection? It's been a tradition and general courtesy around here (what's left of that) to provide links for the source of such profound statements.

I'm assuming it's this article here: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/cnn-gets-served-failing-network-lose
s-to-food-network-in-latest-ratings/
Quote:
According to the numbers compiled by Nielsen Media Research, CNN’s prime-time programming attracted an average viewership of 758,000 from June 18-24 for the 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. (Eastern) time period.

Among cable news networks, that number is good for third — which doesn’t sound too bad until you remember there are only three cable news networks.

And the difference between the three wasn’t even close. Fox News Channel was tops among all cable channels with an average of just over 2 million prime-time viewers for the week. MSNBC was in second with 1.49 million.

More like 1/3rd than 1/4.
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
If your statement is factual (and I have no reason to believe it isn't) that just tells you a lot about the average "I just don't give a sh*t" citizen/non-voter in this country.

How does this tell us "a lot about the average "I just don't give a sh*t" citizen/non-voter in this country"?

I'd argue that it only tells us that the average citizen doesn't give a shit. Which is something I've been saying here for well over a year.

I think the only information that can be inferred here other than the fact that an overwhelming majority of the people don't give a shit, is that of those that do, a majority would rather get their "news" from right wing shills than left wing shills.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Thanks for posting the linky.
I had thought FNC still had about 3.7 million - but that may have been one show. And I thought CNN dropped below 1 million for the new week data. Good that you found the actual numbers, I hate generalizing with numbers.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 2:41 PM

I just realized something. With Prime Time viewership at 758,000 this means one out of every 433 Americans is stupid enough to be watching the CNN feed of Fake News.

So essentially, if you find yourself watching CNN, then you can rest assured that you are more stupid than the next 432 people you bump into, on average with a statistically balanced sampling.
And that you would need to find a random grouping of 867 Americans to be reasonably confident that you are smarter than at least one of those people.

Of course, most of those 758,000 are probably concentrated in New York.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 3:11 PM

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 5:32 PM

Quote:

Fox viewers watch and get their news from Fox. CNN and MSNBC viewers not only watch both networks but also get their news from CBS, ABC, NBC, CSPAN, CNBC, BBC, Bloomberg news, Business Insider and so on and so on. All according to Trump and his minions are fake news. Get the point?

Color me not surprised that this is one of those most stupid out of every 433 people. Assuming this one is American.

This Troll might also imagine that each of the MSM feeders is presenting a different Fake News Story than the others.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 7:31 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I just realized something. With Prime Time viewership at 758,000 this means one out of every 433 Americans is stupid enough to be watching the CNN feed of Fake News.

So essentially, if you find yourself watching CNN, then you can rest assured that you are more stupid than the next 432 people you bump into, on average with a statistically balanced sampling.
And that you would need to find a random grouping of 867 Americans to be reasonably confident that you are smarter than at least one of those people.

Of course, most of those 758,000 are probably concentrated in New York.

That is a pretty funny post, and probably not too far from the truth.

Being an avid Fox News viewer yourself though...

People who live in glass echo chambers should be careful with the stones they throw.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 8:08 PM

I'm not sure how many years it's been since I've seen FNC.
I did watch it's first broadcast, 2 days before it was scheduled to launch.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 8:52 PM

No shit?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 9:57 PM

STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

BENGHAZI! BIRTH CERTIFICATE! PIZZAGATE!

It's all fake news from... you guessed it... Russia.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 9:58 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

Same thing could be said about CNN and MSNBC.

You'd all really be better off watching reruns of Mama's Family or something.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 9:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

Same thing could be said about CNN and MSNBC.

You'd all really be better off watching reruns of Mama's Family or something.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Do something unprecedented. Give us a source.

I gave you one, and there are plenty more.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 10:05 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

Same thing could be said about CNN and MSNBC.

You'd all really be better off watching reruns of Mama's Family or something.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Do something unprecedented. Give us a source.

I gave you one, and there are plenty more.

How about your own source, idiot.

Very first sentence of your link....

Quote:
Media outlets such as Fox News and MSNBC have a negative impact on people's current events knowledge while NPR and Sunday morning political talk shows are the most informative sources of news, according to Fairleigh Dickinson University's newest PublicMind survey.

Oops.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 10:08 PM

Quote:
"Ideological news sources, like Fox and MSNBC, are really just talking to one audience," Political scientist and poll analyst Dan Cassino said in a press release. "This is solid evidence that if you're not in that audience, you're not going to get anything out of watching them."

See my echo chamber statement above.

Quote:
They found that someone who watched only Fox News would be expected to answer 1.04 domestic questions correctly compared to 1.22 for those who watched no news at all. Those watching only "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" answered 1.42 questions correctly and people who only listened to NPR or only watched Sunday morning political talk shows answered 1.51 questions correctly.

What did I say the other day, and many other times in the past about The Daily Show and The Onion being a better source of news than the MSM?

Yeah. I'm right again.

Thanks for the link.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 10:08 PM

Do you know what "context" means? It does have 2 syllables, so maybe not.

The first thing to realize is that every news medium has its own audience demographics. It's no secret to advertisers that the average Fox News viewer has less formal education and income than the average New York Times reader.

The Times is urban and urbane; Fox is small-town/suburban and populist. Fox competes directly against hundreds of other cable channels and has established a specialized niche in its media ecology. Fox trades in stories about the venality of big government, liberal overreach and little-guy heroes of the heartland. A large share of Fox stories deftly push emotional buttons (lest the viewer push the buttons on his or her remote…)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/07/21/a-rigorous-scientific-lo
ok-into-the-fox-news-effect/#332d56ee12ab

Source 2. You've yet to provide any. Perhaps you just can't.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 10:11 PM

Quote:
Cassino concluded that "the most popular of the national media sources—Fox, CNN, MSNBC—seem to be the least informative."

lol

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 10:13 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:

Source 2. You've yet to provide any. Perhaps you just can't.

I don't need to. You already did it for me.

All of those quotes were from your first source.

I'm sure you missed them because they went past your ultra-left filters.

Maybe read your own source a few more times and I bet you'll finally see them.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 10:13 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Cassino concluded that "the most popular of the national media sources—Fox, CNN, MSNBC—seem to be the least informative."

lol

Do Right, Be Right. :)

And yet, their viewers are still more informed than you.

Point missed, once again. Whoosh! lol

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 10:14 PM

And maybe you'd care to stop editing your post after somebody has replied. That's 3 times you've done it now.

Bad internet comment etiquette.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 10:14 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:

Source 2. You've yet to provide any. Perhaps you just can't.

I don't need to. You already did it for me.

All of those quotes were from your first source.

I'm sure you missed them because they went past your ultra-left filters.

Maybe read your own source a few more times and I bet you'll finally see them.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Are you man enough to admit you lost again, or will you just puss out, as usual?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, July 1, 2018 10:14 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Cassino concluded that "the most popular of the national media sources—Fox, CNN, MSNBC—seem to be the least informative."

lol

Do Right, Be Right. :)
And yet, their viewers are still more informed than you.

Point missed, once again. Whoosh! lol

Bitch, I just owned you.

Just walk off the court, son....

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, July 2, 2018 4:34 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
No shit?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Which part?
Decent programming like FNC costs money for the viewer, it is always a premium Channel on Cable. Which is another reason I don't bother with pay TV. CNN has always been free, and now they can't give it away.
The relatives I visit have gobs of Channels, but if FNC is in their package, they won't ever watch it.

I probably found some FCN in hotels around winter of 15/16. But by the time my on-site work wrapped for the day, it would have been non-Prime Time.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, July 2, 2018 4:41 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

Same thing could be said about CNN and MSNBC.

You'd all really be better off watching reruns of Mama's Family or something.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Do something unprecedented. Give us a source.

I gave you one, and there are plenty more.

How about your own source, idiot.

Very first sentence of your link....
Quote:
Media outlets such as Fox News and MSNBC have a negative impact on people's current events knowledge while NPR and Sunday morning political talk shows are the most informative sources of news, according to Fairleigh Dickinson University's newest PublicMind survey.

Oops.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NPR? Holy crap, how worthless that survey must be.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, July 2, 2018 9:10 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

Same thing could be said about CNN and MSNBC.

You'd all really be better off watching reruns of Mama's Family or something.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Do something unprecedented. Give us a source.

I gave you one, and there are plenty more.

How about your own source, idiot.

Very first sentence of your link....
Quote:
Media outlets such as Fox News and MSNBC have a negative impact on people's current events knowledge while NPR and Sunday morning political talk shows are the most informative sources of news, according to Fairleigh Dickinson University's newest PublicMind survey.

Oops.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
NPR? Holy crap, how worthless that survey must be.

I think the point of the article is, as I stated above, that you'd be just as equipped to answer the questions in that survey from watching reruns of Mama's family as you would any of the news outlets on either side.

It's a sad thing, really, that out of 5 questions about domestic and 5 questions about international things, even avid viewers of the news can't come close to answering 2 of them on average in either category.

RF posted that article because of the negative title it had about Fox News viewers without actually reading anything inside of it.

There's nothing to celebrate about your news of choice if you have a .008% improvement in your overall ability to answer questions that you would have answered if you didn't watch it at all. This is why RF had lost the argument from the beginning.

I actually love the title of that article, because it gets people to read things they don't want to know about themselves (or it least it gets them to link it for smarter people to decipher it and point those sad truths out to them).

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, July 2, 2018 9:31 AM

This should all probably be taken with a grain of salt though.

If you read the very last paragraph, it states the following:

Quote:
It is a follow-up to a 2011 survey of 612 New Jerseyans that found, among other things, that those who watched Fox News were 18 points less likely to know that Egyptians overthrew their government than those who watch no news at all.

I don't think that anybody, pretty much anywhere, would be comfortable with how up until that point the term "people" is constantly thrown around as if to suggest these results reflect "all people in the U.S.", when you're talking about two surveys that were given to only "New Jerseyans" right in the middle of the height of popularity of the show "Jersey Shore".

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, July 2, 2018 1:49 PM

GIGO.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, July 2, 2018 1:51 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
GIGO.

Pretty much sums up the RWED.

This place is one of my last guilty pleasures outside of cigarettes and coffee.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, July 4, 2018 8:13 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
GIGO.

This was as applicable to that survey.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, July 4, 2018 8:39 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
GIGO.
This was as applicable to that survey.

Yeah.

I re-appropriated it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 8, 2018 7:47 PM

I heard that CNN is the favorite Show of the North Korean Generals.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, December 17, 2018 5:43 PM

Have people forgotten that nobody watches CNN?
Yep, if you watch, you are a nobody.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, December 17, 2018 5:48 PM

... stay crunchy...

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Have people forgotten that nobody watches CNN?
Yep, if you watch, you are a nobody.

I still can't decide if you are Kiki's puppet or Sighole's. AU?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, December 17, 2018 5:54 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
GIGO.
This was as applicable to that survey.

Yeah.

I re-appropriated it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

In reference to those surveys: if you define "current events" as whatever npr yakked about, FOX viewers will be less informed about those supposed "current events" - duh.
Like when MSM reports that the most important issue today for politicians to discuss is the trans-gender Rights of Career Criminals in prison, and the Taxpayer's Responsibility to pay all expenses. Any reasonable person would not know that is a Current Event.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, December 17, 2018 7:43 PM

I've seen folk here claim that, to find an opposing point of view, they look to another excrement output of the same MSM.

I wonder how many who are looking for an alternative to MSM check out CNSnews.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, December 17, 2018 9:29 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
lol...

burning trash cans and wet dreams about punching "Nazis" while dressing up like Kick Ass.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

You dream of a neoNazi 4th reich and a homeland for white people.

I'll be there to knock your ass out when you try it.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, December 17, 2018 9:32 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I've seen folk here claim that, to find an opposing point of view, they look to another excrement output of the same MSM.

I wonder how many who are looking for an alternative to MSM check out CNSnews.

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, overt propaganda, poor or no sourcing to credible information and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the notes section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Bias: Extreme Right, Propaganda

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cns-news/

Now do you know why we don't care for it? It's fascist propaganda, which is pretty much all your sources, all day long.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 8:33 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I've seen folk here claim that, to find an opposing point of view, they look to another excrement output of the same MSM.

I wonder how many who are looking for an alternative to MSM check out CNSnews.
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, overt propaganda, poor or no sourcing to credible information and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the notes section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Bias: Extreme Right, Propaganda

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cns-news/

Now do you know why we don't care for it? It's fascist propaganda, which is pretty much all your sources, all day long.

Good site:

CNN - LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

MSNBC - LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

VOX - LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vox/

Mother Jones - LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mother-jones/

I do find it quite funny that while all of them are rated as "publishing misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes" and "some sources in this category may be untrustworthy", somehow Vox and Mother Jones get a "Factual Reporting" rating of "high" while CNN and MSNBC get "mixed".

lol

Maybe this site should tell you guys something?

Perhaps you should branch out and consume news from sources that aren't only telling you what you want to hear.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 11:19 AM

... stay crunchy...

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Maybe this site should tell you guys something?

The "left" press and in general, is more honest than the right - check. Thanks for that - we already knew.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 2:40 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Maybe this site should tell you guys something?

The "left" press and in general, is more honest than the right - check. Thanks for that - we already knew.

That's the definition of a subjective statement. Thanks for the shining example.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 4:07 PM

... stay crunchy...

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
That's the definition of a subjective statement. Thanks for the shining example.

You're welcome! You're like a lot of "people" that think because there are 2 parties they are the same just with different lies. Hardly.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 4:10 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

Quote:
Originally posted by GEEBERS:
You're like a lot of "people" that think because there are 2 parties they are the same just with different lies.

A liar AND a mind-reader as well! You're a man of many talents!

tic tac

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 4:42 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Maybe this site should tell you guys something?
The "left" press and in general, is more honest than the right - check. Thanks for that - we already knew.
That's the definition of a subjective statement. Thanks for the shining example.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

butbutbutbut the Left clearly said that The Left was right!!
That must mean it is true! The Left would never ever lie, they said they don't.
In unrelated news, if The Left posted it on the interwebs, then we all know it must be true. Everything on the interwebs is always true. google it.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 4:42 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Maybe this site should tell you guys something?
The "left" press and in general, is more honest than the right - check. Thanks for that - we already knew.
That's the definition of a subjective statement. Thanks for the shining example.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, April 25, 2019 12:05 PM