Quote:

---

The law, the first of its kind in the nation and aimed squarely at Trump, violates a specification of the state constitution calling for an “inclusive open presidential primary ballot,” the court said.

“Ultimately, it is the voters who must decide whether the refusal of a ‘recognized candidate throughout the nation or throughout California for the office of President of the United States’ to make such information available to the public will have consequences at the ballot box,” Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye wrote in the 7-0 decision.

---

Quote:

---

“Given the temptation to dig up dirt on political rivals, intrusive subpoenas into personal lives of presidents will become our new normal in times of divided government — no matter which party is in power. If every committee chairman is going to have this unbounded authority, this court should be the one to say so,” Mr. Trump’s lawyers argued in court papers last week.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
https://apnews.com/9a3dec6fa5684ebb9760e9a9f02bde48

Quote:

---

The law, the first of its kind in the nation and aimed squarely at Trump, violates a specification of the state constitution calling for an “inclusive open presidential primary ballot,” the court said.

“Ultimately, it is the voters who must decide whether the refusal of a ‘recognized candidate throughout the nation or throughout California for the office of President of the United States’ to make such information available to the public will have consequences at the ballot box,” Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye wrote in the 7-0 decision.

---

OOPS

Looks like sanity wins again. Don't you hate it when that happens?

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/nov/18/supreme-court-halts-t
urn-over-trump-tax-returns/

Quote:

---

“Given the temptation to dig up dirt on political rivals, intrusive subpoenas into personal lives of presidents will become our new normal in times of divided government — no matter which party is in power. If every committee chairman is going to have this unbounded authority, this court should be the one to say so,” Mr. Trump’s lawyers argued in court papers last week.

---

Thankfully, we have at least a few people in the system who can look 4 or 8 years into the future and not make any snap judgements on things that will come to bite them hard in the ass in the future because their emotions got the best of them.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Don't think I didn't notice how you edited my post in your quote to make it look as if I wrote it otherwise.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Don't think I didn't notice how you edited my post in your quote to make it look as if I wrote it otherwise.

---

Really... and how’d I do that?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Don't think I didn't notice how you edited my post in your quote to make it look as if I wrote it otherwise.

---

Really... and how’d I do that?

---

There are 6 hard returns between my commentary on the first article and the link to the second article.

You removed 5 of them when quoting me, I'm assuming to make it look as if that comment was directed at the link I provided immediately afterward in the post as you quoted it.



That's my assumption as to why you would do that, especially due to the way you worded your reply. Though it's possible, I doubt very much that I'm wrong as to your reason. But you absolutely did do it. I can quote the post myself right now and those hard returns are there. They didn't just magically disappear.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Don't think I didn't notice how you edited my post in your quote to make it look as if I wrote it otherwise.

---

Really... and how’d I do that?

---

There are 6 hard returns between my commentary on the first article and the link to the second article.

You removed 5 of them when quoting me, I'm assuming to make it look as if that comment was directed at the link I provided immediately afterward in the post as you quoted it.



That's my assumption as to why you would do that, especially due to the way you worded your reply. Though it's possible, I doubt very much that I'm wrong as to your reason. But you absolutely did do it. I can quote the post myself right now and those hard returns are there. They didn't just magically disappear.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

You’re joking, right? It’s called “dead space.” We can tell your idiocy from everything else you quote easy enough.










lol x 100

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Don't think I didn't notice how you edited my post in your quote to make it look as if I wrote it otherwise.

---

Really... and how’d I do that?

---

There are 6 hard returns between my commentary on the first article and the link to the second article.

You removed 5 of them when quoting me, I'm assuming to make it look as if that comment was directed at the link I provided immediately afterward in the post as you quoted it.



That's my assumption as to why you would do that, especially due to the way you worded your reply. Though it's possible, I doubt very much that I'm wrong as to your reason. But you absolutely did do it. I can quote the post myself right now and those hard returns are there. They didn't just magically disappear.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

You’re joking, right? It’s called “dead space.” We can tell your idiocy from everything else you quote easy enough.










lol x 100

---

No.







I'm not







joking.

You
edited
my
post
when
you quoted it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Sanity won in California.

Insanity is being held at bay otherwise, at least for now, by the Supreme Court.



Don't think I didn't notice how you edited my post in your quote to make it look as if I wrote it otherwise.


OOPS.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Sanity won in California.

Insanity is being held at bay otherwise, at least for now, by the Supreme Court.



Don't think I didn't notice how you edited my post in your quote to make it look as if I wrote it otherwise.


OOPS.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Have you been able to translate that acronym from the Master Book Writer, OPPS?

Obtuse Pseudo- Psycho Simpleton?

Or something else? I've never been able to decode that, among his/her many eloquent gaffes.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Sanity won in California.

Insanity is being held at bay otherwise, at least for now, by the Supreme Court.



Don't think I didn't notice how you edited my post in your quote to make it look as if I wrote it otherwise.


OOPS.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Have you been able to translate that acronym from the Master Book Writer, OPPS?

Obtuse Pseudo- Psycho Simpleton?

Or something else? I've never been able to decode that, among his/her many eloquent gaffes.

---

Man, this had me rolling on the floor!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Sorry if you got injured.

---