Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Epstein didn't kill himself.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yep, Bill and Hillary had a lot more contact with Epstein than Trump. WISHY seems to be permanently confused on the issue.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Pretty sure you meant the Clintons had him killed.

Maybe the "royal" family.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
BTW, was there ever a point to this thread?

Seems like a few somebodies got all huffy about an event that never happened.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
BTW, was there ever a point to this thread?

Seems like a few somebodies got all huffy about an event that never happened.

---

Yeah, it was to give you another Russia thread to downplay and marginalize.

Gotta earn them Rubles somehow....

---

Quote:

---

STRZOK
"This [NYT] statement is misleading and inaccurate as written. We have not seen evidence of any individuals in contact with Russians (both Governmental and non-Governmental"

"There is no known intel affiliation, and little if any [Government of Russia] affiliation[.] FBI investigation has shown past contact between [Trump campaign volunteer Carter] Page and the SVR [Service of the Russian Federation], but not during his association with the Trump campaign."

"We are unaware of any calls with any Russian government official in which Manafort was a party."

"We do not yet have detailed [Trump campaign] banking records."

"Again, we are unaware of ANY Trump advisers engaging in conversations with Russian intel officials" and "Our coverage has not revealed contact between Russian intelligence officers and the Trump team."

Claim in NYT article: "The F.B.I. asked the N.S.A. to collect as much information as possible about the Russian operatives on the phone calls..."

Note by Strzok: "If they [NSA] did ["collect as much information as possible about Russian operatives on the phone calls"] we are not aware of those communications."

"We have not investigated Roger Stone."

"Recent interviews and investigation, however, reveal Steele may not be in a position to judge the reliability of subsource network."

"This is inaccurate... our investigation of Manafort was opened in August 2016."

Note by Strzok: "This is inaccurate..."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Do you know what your problem is, WISHY? You believe the lamestream media. Despite have been lied to multiple times, you remain as gullible and trusting as the first time you were ever lied to, or the tenth.

Do you reacll WHICH publisher first printed this story?

As I recall, it was the NYT.

Here is what PETER STRZOK had to say about the NYT's published "news" about the so-called RUSSIA!RUSSIA! hysteria early on in the Trump administration, just months after Trump took office, when the NYT was publishing articles about all of the "contacts" between the various members of the Trump team and Russia:

Remember, this is ANTI-TRUMP PETER STRZOK OF THE FBI, WHO WAS ACTIVELY WOKRING TO DEPOSE TRUMP FROM OFFICE WITH FAKE CHARGES OF COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA, AND THESE ARE HIS NOTES FROM THAT TIME

Quote:

---

STRZOK
"This [NYT] statement is misleading and inaccurate as written. We have not seen evidence of any individuals in contact with Russians (both Governmental and non-Governmental"

"There is no known intel affiliation, and little if any [Government of Russia] affiliation[.] FBI investigation has shown past contact between [Trump campaign volunteer Carter] Page and the SVR [Service of the Russian Federation], but not during his association with the Trump campaign."

"We are unaware of any calls with any Russian government official in which Manafort was a party."

"We do not yet have detailed [Trump campaign] banking records."

"Again, we are unaware of ANY Trump advisers engaging in conversations with Russian intel officials" and "Our coverage has not revealed contact between Russian intelligence officers and the Trump team."

Claim in NYT article: "The F.B.I. asked the N.S.A. to collect as much information as possible about the Russian operatives on the phone calls..."

Note by Strzok: "If they [NSA] did ["collect as much information as possible about Russian operatives on the phone calls"] we are not aware of those communications."

"We have not investigated Roger Stone."

"Recent interviews and investigation, however, reveal Steele may not be in a position to judge the reliability of subsource network."

"This is inaccurate... our investigation of Manafort was opened in August 2016."

Note by Strzok: "This is inaccurate..."

---

In other words, Peter Strzok was aware, as was the rest of his chain of command, that not only was the NYT punlishing numerous falsehoods about Trump, but that the "source" of much of this information - Steele- had no contacts in Russia and was therefore unreliable.

However, bc the FBI COC ... Strzok, Comey, et al, were also colluding to drive Trump from office, none of them stepped forward to correct the reporting, and were in fact colluding with the press.

I know it's a difficult mindset to change, but instead of assuming that the M$M is telling the truth until they've been proven to be lying, you're MUCH safer assuming that they're lying - or at least spinning like crazy- until demonstrated otherwise. If you do that, you won't be fooled so often into believing nonsense.

You CAN, for example, apply a few basic questions to any reporting, from any source:
Qui bono? Who benefits? Somebody benefits and somebody loses from every story. and...
Why now? Out of the thousands of stories that could be run on any particular day, some are bannered and others are banished. These are conscious choices made by editors, with a purpose in mind.

Here, for example, is a good explanation why the lamestream media is not reporting on this information but is instead redirecting people's attention to identitu politics and symbolic victories over statues which change absolutely nothing

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Pretty sure you meant the Clintons had him killed.

Maybe the "royal" family.

---

Oblivious, as always.

The judge presiding over the Deutsche Bank and Epstein case just had her family taken out.

You know who was up to their neck in Deutsche Bank money, moron??

Hint: It ain't the Clintons...


It's your orange god, Chumpsky

---

Quote:

---

Taking bets on how long Ghislaine Maxwell remains alive before Chumpsky and Clinton have her murdered...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Do you know what your problem is, WISHY? You believe the lamestream media. Despite have been lied to multiple times, you remain as gullible and trusting as the first time you were ever lied to, or the tenth.

---

SIGNYM defending Russia? This place never changes.
Bored again.

---

As G, sig continues to blame the main stream media for all the misinformation out there. When in fact, they've been incredibly good. Everyone out there who bucks what they have been reporting is either a troll, an ideologue who doesn't care about the truth, only their chosen side coming out on top, or stupid beyond belief.

Let’s not forget, as demonstrated by her last post here. Sig likes to post confusing posts. Posts of stockpiled untruths about events in the form of rants. The amount of reporting she and others here have dismissed as being fake, is the evidence of their intentions. They are the rotten eggs of this firefly site.


T

Quote:

---

CC:

SIGNYM defending Russia? This place never changes.
Bored again.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


The difference is, you're not joking when you blame it on Trump.

I'm sure they would have done it if they felt the need to, but they don't need to. Trump doesn't need to.


If they ever manage to find that guy who dressed up in a Fed Ex uniform, it's not going to matter at all. He was a nobody. Some local thug who was either paid $10k or blackmailed into doing it. He knows nothing.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


I'm sure he was a Trump supporting incel.

You're a hoot.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:



Remember when they told us all that Epstein flung himself off his 4 1/2 foot tall 2nd bunk like an Olympic Gymnast and broke his neck?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:



Remember when they told us all that Epstein flung himself off his 4 1/2 foot tall 2nd bunk like an Olympic Gymnast and broke his neck?

---

You really believe Chump supporting Maxwell publicly means NOTHING, don't you?

---

Quote:

---

UK Government Failed to Find Whether Russia Meddled in Brexit Vote: Report

Britain's government failed to find out whether Russia meddled in the 2016 referendum on membership of the EU, a parliamentary report released on Tuesday said, saying the intelligence services should investigate and make their findings public.

The long-anticipated report by parliament's intelligence and security committee found that Russia had tried to influence a separate referendum in 2014 when voters in Scotland rejected independence.

But it said the committee was unable to determine whether Russia had attempted to influence the European Union referendum, which led to Britain's exit from the bloc this year.

When asked for evidence on suspected Russian meddling in the vote, Britain's main domestic intelligence agency MI5 produced just six lines of text, the committee said.

---

Quote:

---

... The government of Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who came to power as one of the leading figures in the victorious campaign to leave the EU, rejected the call for a further review. A spokesman for Johnson said the prime minister was confident the referendum result to leave the EU was fair.

The report cast Russia as a hostile power which posed a significant threat to Britain and the West across a range of fronts, from espionage and cyber to election meddling and laundering dirty money."It appears that Russia considers the UK one of its top Western intelligence targets," the report said.

It said there were open source indications that Russia had sought to influence the Brexit campaign. But hard evidence had not been produced.

---

Quote:

---

"The key point is ... they had not sought even to ask that question and that is at the heart of this report," Stewart Hosie, a Scottish National Party member of the committee, told reporters.

British foreign minister Dominic Raab rejected claims that the government had avoided investigating Russia.

"We have a long period recognising the enduring and significant threat posed by Russia," he said. "We are not for a second complacent."

Russia has repeatedly denied meddling in the West, casting the United States and Britain as gripped by anti-Russian hysteria.

"Russia has never interfered in the electoral processes of any country in the world - not the United States, not Britain, nor any other countries," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova cast the report as "Russophobia in a fake frame".

RUSSIAN MEDDLING AND MONEY

Relations between London and Moscow plunged to post-Cold War lows after Britain blamed Russia for poisoning former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia with a nerve agent in the English city of Salisbury.

Last week, the British government said it believed Russian actors had tried to meddle in last year's general election, which was held after the report published on Tuesday was finished.

When discussing the EU referendum, the report is heavily redacted and there was a classified annex that was not published.

The committee also cast Russia as a source of corrupt money that had been welcomed in London, the world's premier international financial capital.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
OH, LOOK! SOMETHING ELSE THAT RUSSIA DIDN'T DO!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Pretty sure you meant the Clintons had him killed.

Maybe the "royal" family.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Sure. Whatever.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Our resident Russian trolls: Using the same talking points all Russian trolls use.

Coincidence?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Our resident Russian trolls: Using the same talking points all Russian trolls use.

Coincidence?

---

Every damn day for 15 YEARS, I mean that's some quality brainwashing. Why would ANYONE think Russia should take over ANYTHING?? I don't get it...


Good job though, Chump Administration. Way to cover our asses

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9064709/Russian-hack-federal-
government-hard-overstate-says-ex-homeland-security-adviser.html#comments


Russia is damn hard at work starting WW3...

---

Quote:

---

Libya:
Several suspended assets were linked to the Stop Terror media brand, which ran a daily podcast.
The network pushed for the release of Russian sociologist Maksim Shugalei and his translator Samir Seifan from a Libyan prison.

Sudan:
Like the 2019 Prigozhin-Sudan operation, the Pages targeting Sudan in this takedown heavily leveraged “news” websites. Narratively, these Pages and linked sites discussed Sudan’s economic crisis and positively framed a Russian-Sudanese deal for a Russian naval base in Sudan, and positively framed ongoing Russian activities in Sudan’s mining sector.

Syria:
Overall, Syria-focused assets mobilized in support of the Bashar al-Assad regime, government ... (... which is reocgnized by the UN as the legitimate government of Syria).
The Syrian Facebook Pages told negative stories about the lives of Syrian refugees, perhaps as part of push and pull strategies to promote refugee resettlement.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

So ... not targeting a US interest, and not done by the Russian government, but one was linked to the French military.

---

Quote:

---

Libya:
Several suspended assets were linked to the Stop Terror media brand, which ran a daily podcast.
The network pushed for the release of Russian sociologist Maksim Shugalei and his translator Samir Seifan from a Libyan prison.

Sudan:
Like the 2019 Prigozhin-Sudan operation, the Pages targeting Sudan in this takedown heavily leveraged “news” websites. Narratively, these Pages and linked sites discussed Sudan’s economic crisis and positively framed a Russian-Sudanese deal for a Russian naval base in Sudan, and positively framed ongoing Russian activities in Sudan’s mining sector.

Syria:
Overall, Syria-focused assets mobilized in support of the Bashar al-Assad regime, government ... (... which is reocgnized by the UN as the legitimate government of Syria).
The Syrian Facebook Pages told negative stories about the lives of Syrian refugees, perhaps as part of push and pull strategies to promote refugee resettlement.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

reposted to get a fact-based response

So ... not targeting a US interest, and not done by the Russian government, but one was linked to the French military.


The aims appear to have been:

Quote:

---

Libya:
Several suspended assets were linked to the Stop Terror media brand, which ran a daily podcast.
The network pushed for the release of Russian sociologist Maksim Shugalei and his translator Samir Seifan from a Libyan prison.

Sudan:
Like the 2019 Prigozhin-Sudan operation, the Pages targeting Sudan in this takedown heavily leveraged “news” websites. Narratively, these Pages and linked sites discussed Sudan’s economic crisis and positively framed a Russian-Sudanese deal for a Russian naval base in Sudan, and positively framed ongoing Russian activities in Sudan’s mining sector.

Syria:
Overall, Syria-focused assets mobilized in support of the Bashar al-Assad regime, government ... (... which is reocgnized by the UN as the legitimate government of Syria).
The Syrian Facebook Pages told negative stories about the lives of Syrian refugees, perhaps as part of push and pull strategies to promote refugee resettlement.

---

So dastardly!!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
Too many good facts, KIKI! Get with the narrative!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
Too many good facts, KIKI! Get with the narrative!

---

Every time you twits defend Russian hacking you just look like more and more of a joke around here, you know that right???

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
Every time you panic about RUSIIA!RUSSIA! or FASCISM! without the slightest evidence you look like a panicked cow.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:


Otherwise, it's just people quoting people who quoted someone who heard an anonymous someone say something... ON AN AVERAGE OF EVERY THREE MONTHS.

And, meh.

---