Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
There's no reason to believe that Democrats are better at cheating than Republicans are.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted:
BREAKING: Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules that election officials are PROHIBITED from rejecting mail-in ballots based on signature comparison. Nor may a party "challenge based on signature analysis and comparisons."
https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1319691963520684033?s=21

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Trump Supporter Arrested For Requesting Absentee Ballot For Dead Mother
The president accuses Democrats of “voter fraud,” but one of his supporters became the first person in a Pennsylvania county charged with the crime in 30 years.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/-trump-supporter-arrested-voter-fraud-p
ennsylvania_n_5f91e43ec5b61c185f4848de?ncid=engmodushpmg00000004
Look! Voter fraud! Oh, wait...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted:
Biden's secret plan to steal the election:

Get the most votes.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
BREAKING: Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules that election officials are PROHIBITED from rejecting mail-in ballots based on signature comparison. Nor may a party "challenge based on signature analysis and comparisons."
https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1319691963520684033?s=21

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Originally posted:
BREAKING: Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules that election officials are PROHIBITED from rejecting mail-in ballots based on signature comparison. Nor may a party "challenge based on signature analysis and comparisons."
https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1319691963520684033?s=21

---

So, isn't this a wau of saying that signatures could be forged en masse, and nobody could check them?

Sounds like.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Wow.

The mind boggles at the idea that American Citizens actually voted for Obiden in 2020.

A mindless, senile empty suit marionette. Maybe they were votiung for the first woman to be Innaugurated on Jan 20. Nancy must be gearing up.

Sure, we all knew there were a Libtard block who will always vote for the radical.
And the low-information voter block haqd a great push to the polls.
And Election interference, fraud, voter suppression, and election theft in great numbers.

But still, how did so many states escape reality.


I knew CA had an exodus to TX, but didn't know they stopped in AZ

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Was listening to a Poll Observer from Detroit.

Detroit poll workers were allowing voters to vote in the wrong ward, where they were not registered in, so that each name could vote in multiple polling stations.

And poll nworkers were also giving fresh ballot to voters who had already voted absentee.

The poll workers said they were instructed, trained to do these things.

Sounds like Institutionalized Election Fraud.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
The Safe Harbor deadline is 8 December. That is when States are supposed to have found and corrected voting irregularities, fraud, miscounts, recounts, etc. in process before the Electoral College.


If you were a State Legislator, the sole Constitutional authority for establishing and controlling Federal Elections, and you had ensured that all Election Laws were in place; and then yur local and State Courts bypassed, circumvented, and defied the Laws of your State to facilitate Election Theft in your State - would you sit idly by and support this Fraud? Or would you hold hearings to investigate why your laws were not obeyed, and correct the problem while it was still within your State's purview?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
The Safe Harbor deadline is 8 December. That is when States are supposed to have found and corrected voting irregularities, fraud, miscounts, recounts, etc. in process before the Electoral College.


If you were a State Legislator, the sole Constitutional authority for establishing and controlling Federal Elections, and you had ensured that all Election Laws were in place; and then yur local and State Courts bypassed, circumvented, and defied the Laws of your State to facilitate Election Theft in your State - would you sit idly by and support this Fraud? Or would you hold hearings to investigate why your laws were not obeyed, and correct the problem while it was still within your State's purview?

---

Quote:

---

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

---

Quote:

---

In comparison, bugs in polling machines have provided tens of thousands of Trump votes to Biden, and numerous organizations have found evidence that large amounts of ballots have been cast for dead voters in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
The Safe Harbor deadline is 8 December. That is when States are supposed to have found and corrected voting irregularities, fraud, miscounts, recounts, etc. in process before the Electoral College.


If you were a State Legislator, the sole Constitutional authority for establishing and controlling Federal Elections, and you had ensured that all Election Laws were in place; and then yur local and State Courts bypassed, circumvented, and defied the Laws of your State to facilitate Election Theft in your State - would you sit idly by and support this Fraud? Or would you hold hearings to investigate why your laws were not obeyed, and correct the problem while it was still within your State's purview?

---

The United States Constitution. Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2:

Quote:

---

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

---

The Legislature of each State is the sole authority for directing and determining which Electors are sent to the Electoral College. Not the State and local Courts within the States, not the Secretary of State within each State, not the Elections Official defying the State Laws, such as has been happening in these States which are now confused about who was elected.

Although we all know that Libtards hate The Constitution, that really is the only Law that should be obeyed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
2 honest Election Officials won't go along with the Election Fraud, until Antifags threaten violence:

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/republican-canvassers-ask-rescind-votes-1505
00513.html

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

So I am wondering.

If Sloppy Joe The Pretender gets into the Oval Office, what kind of Governemtn will we have then?

---

An honest one. Hey JSF, time to fix your countdown clock until Trump is kicked out of office. For accuracy try mine. I believe it's 29 days left until then. Can you say shit, boy was I wrong? I can. Shit, boy were you wrong. Can you say Trumps a loser? I can. Trumps a loser.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

So, what kind of Government will this be called?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
So I am wondering.

If Sloppy Joe The Pretender gets into the Oval Office, what kind of Governemtn will we have then?

---

An honest one. Hey JSF, time to fix your countdown clock until Trump is kicked out of office. For accuracy try mine. I believe it's 29 days left until then. Can you say shit, boy was I wrong? I can. Shit, boy were you wrong. Can you say Trumps a loser? I can. Trumps a loser.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
So, what kind of Government will this be called?

---

There's a very general name, called an oligarchy - government by and for the few, in this case the rich and powerful.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Sounds like the continued efforts to Stop The Steal might just return America to The Rule Of Law, avoiding this Swamp Coup.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-republicans-mount-ditch-effort-c
ontest-election-results/story?id=74519816


Electoral Vote can be challenged, just like Dems did in 2017. Over 120 Congressmen signed the Amicus Brief on the Texas suit at SCOTUS.

Up to 2 hours of debate may be incurred per each challenge. Each member may challenge each contested Electoral Vote, of which PA submitted 20. For MI, WI, GA, PA, AZ, NV, NM, VA there are over 90. That could be pover 10,800 Challenges. Times 2 hours per debate is over 21,600 hours. If only 8 hours per day, that gives 2,700 days before the Electoral Count would be done. Starting on 5 Jan, this would go past 20 Jan.

I have heard 18 January is some deadline specified somewhere, but I don't see where.

The overall reference is the Electoral Count Act of 1887.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_Count_Act

If the Electoral Vote Count is not completed by a certain date, or neither candidate achieves more than 269 Electoral Votes in the process, the Election for President goes to the House, and the 28 GOP-majority State Delegations will outweigh the 20 Dem-majority State Delegations, and likely Trump would win.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Sounds like the continued efforts to Stop The Steal might just return America to The Rule Of Law, avoiding this Swamp Coup.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-republicans-mount-ditch-effort-c
ontest-election-results/story?id=74519816


Electoral Vote can be challenged, just like Dems did in 2017. Over 120 Congressmen signed the Amicus Brief on the Texas suit at SCOTUS.

Up to 2 hours of debate may be incurred per each challenge. Each member may challenge each contested Electoral Vote, of which PA submitted 20. For MI, WI, GA, PA, AZ, NV, NM, VA there are over 90. That could be pover 10,800 Challenges. Times 2 hours per debate is over 21,600 hours. If only 8 hours per day, that gives 2,700 days before the Electoral Count would be done. Starting on 5 Jan, this would go past 20 Jan.

I have heard 18 January is some deadline specified somewhere, but I don't see where.

The overall reference is the Electoral Count Act of 1887.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_Count_Act

If the Electoral Vote Count is not completed by a certain date, or neither candidate achieves more than 269 Electoral Votes in the process, the Election for President goes to the House, and the 28 GOP-majority State Delegations will outweigh the 20 Dem-majority State Delegations, and likely Trump would win.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Well ... we have NEVER had in our Constitution direct citizen vote for the President.

So ... f*ck the Constitution?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by CAPTAINCRUNCH:
I don't think that would qualify us as a Democracy at that point, right?

---