Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I should probably start with this useful data.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
In 2012 Obama beat Romney, with only 409,500 votes deciding the race. This means if the right 205,000 voters had changed, Romney would have won. With an estimated Voting Eligible Population of 222,474,000 this means that less than one one-thousandth of the Eligible Voters decided the race, or less than 0.1%. With total vote count of 129,237,000 the percentage was about 0.15% of those who voted.

---

In 2016, Trump beat Hilliary, with only 54,996 votes (in MI and PA) deciding the race. This means that if the right 27,498 voters had changed, Hilliary would have won. (5,352 in MI and 22,146 in PA).

Quote:

---

Of course, no state has voted for Democrats in every elections since 1971, but Minnesota has done so for every election after 1972. Even when the most conservative President we've had in modern times was running, every other state voted for Reagan, but not MN. But they only had an 8 percent margin in 2012, meaning that if 4% of their voters had shifted, the state would have gone to Romney. In 2008 they had a margin of 10%.

---

Hilliary had a 1.51% margin in MN.


Let us review 2016.

Quote:

---

Consider these groups of states.
Group 1. 102 Electors. 13 States.
TX, SC, AL, OK, UT, KS, MS, NE, ID, WY, ND, SD, AK.
These states have voted Republican in every election since 1979, and the closest margin in 2012 was SC with 10%. Most people can assume they will go to the GOP in 2016. This group had 91 Electors in 1980, but they have embraced progress and Free Enterprise and flourished, expanding their proportional population.

Group 2. 19 Electors.
GA, MT.
These 2 have voted for GOP in each election since 1982 except for 1992. Both can be assumed to go for GOP in 2016, although GA had only an 8% margin in 2012. They had 16 Electors in 1980.

Group 3. 59 Electors.
TN, AZ, MO, LA, KY, AR, WV.
These states have voted for GOP in almost all elections since 1979 except for the Perot years, 1992 & 1996. They also each have a margin in 2012 of 9% or more. They are likely to vote GOP in 2016.

Group 4. 26 Electors.
NC, IN.
These 2 states have voted Right every election since 1979 except 2008. In 2012 IN voted R by a margin of 10%, and 2008 voted D by a margin of 1.0%. NC voted R in 2012 by a margin or 2% and in 2008 voted D by a margin of 0.32%. These would likely vote Republican if there was a decent candidate.

5. 29 Electors.
FL*.
Florida has voted R since 1979 except 1996, 2008, and 2012. The margin in 2012 was 0.9%. This would easily go to Republican if a decent candidate was available. Florida had 17 Electors in 1980.

---

Groups 1-5 all voted for Trump. 235 Electors. 25 States.

Quote:

---

6. 40 Electors.
CO*, VA, OH*.
These 3 States usually vote for the winner since 1979, and in 2012 voted Dem by a margin ranging between 3% and 5%. A decent candidate would put these back in the GOP column. Ohio has lost 28% of it's Elector count since 1980.

---

Group 6: OH maintained it's record of voting for every winner since 1963. The other 2 remained on the Dark Side. Trump 253 EV, 26 States. Hilliary 22 EV, 2 States.

Quote:

---

Group 7. 57 Electors.
NM*, MN, WI, IA, NV*, PA.
Other than the Reagan/Bush41 years, these states have mostly voted for Dems since then, and in 2012 had margins of between 5% and 10% for Obama. These would likely vote Democrat if there was a decent candidate. This group had 63 Electors in 1980.

---

Group 7 split: WI, IA, PA went to Trump, the others remained on the Dark Side. Trump 289 EV, 29 States. Hilliary 43 EV, 5 States.

Quote:

---

Group 8. 31 Electors.
MI, OR, NH*, ME
These states have voted for Democrats since 1990, and had a large margin in 2012, with MI the tightest margin at 10%. These are likely to go to Democrats in 2016. This group had 35 Electors in 1980.

---

Group 8: MI voted Trump in 2016, the rest stayed on the Dark Side. Trump 305 EV, 30 States.

Quote:

---

Group 9. 175 Electors. 12 States.
CA, NY, IL, NJ, WA, MA, MD, CT, VT, HI, RI, DE, DC.
These states have voted for Democrats in every Presidential election since 1990. Unless the GOP puts up somebody similar to the most conservative of recent history - Reagan - these states are likely to stick with the Democrats. This makes them useless in terms of campaigning - no need to spend money or time in these states, other than to raise money to spend in other, competitive states. This group had 187 Electors in 1980, and other than CA and WA have lost 25 Electors as a group. Their liberalism has decimated their states, shunning prosperity, turning their back on progress, forcing populations to go elsewhere like conservative states, but they drag along their inept liberal thinking so they can destroy their new homes like they did the place they left.

---

Group 9 voted Hilliary in 2016.

Quote:

---

States with an asterisk have voted for the winner in almost all elections since 1979. Only OH and NV have voted for the winner in every election since 1979, and OH since 1963.

---

OH and FL were the only asterisk States to vote for the winner.

Quote:

---

Groups 1-6 would garner 275 Electors for the GOP, winning the Presidency. A reasonable expectation.

Regarding Electoral shift since 1980, the States with the largest percentage increase of Electors are NV 100%, AZ 83%, FL 71%, UT 50%, TX 46%, GA 33%, which are in groups 1-6 except NV.
The states with the largest percentage loss of Electors are NY 29%, OH 28%, PA 26%, IA 25%, MI 24%, IL 23%, which are in groups 6-9 and vote Democrat more often.

---

Trump in 2016: EV 304, 30 STATES.
AK, ID, UT, AZ, MT, WY, ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, TX, IA, MO, AR, LA, WI, MI, IN, OH, PA, WV, KY, TN, NC, AL, MS, GA, SC, FL.
Hilliary: EV 227, 20 States.
WA, OR, CA, NV, HI, MN, IL, VA, MD, DE, NJ, NY, MA, CT, RI, VT, NH, ME, CO, NM.
2 Electors from TX did not vote for Trump.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
So, how this data works moving forward in 2020:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
In 2012 Obama beat Romney, with only 409,500 votes deciding the race. This means if the right 205,000 voters had changed, Romney would have won. With an estimated Voting Eligible Population of 222,474,000 this means that less than one one-thousandth of the Eligible Voters decided the race, or less than 0.1%. With total vote count of 129,237,000 the percentage was about 0.15% of those who voted.

Of course, no state has voted for Democrats in every elections since 1971, but Minnesota has done so for every election after 1972. Even when the most conservative President we've had in modern times was running, every other state voted for Reagan, but not MN. But they only had an 8 percent margin in 2012, meaning that if 4% of their voters had shifted, the state would have gone to Romney. In 2008 they had a margin of 10%.

Consider these groups of states.
Group 1. 102 Electors.
TX, SC, AL, OK, UT, KS, MS, NE, ID, WY, ND, SD, AK.
These states have voted Republican in every election since 1979, and the closest margin in 2012 was SC with 10%. Most people can assume they will go to the GOP in 2016. This group had 91 Electors in 1980, but they have embraced progress and Free Enterprise and flourished, expanding their proportional population.

---

TX 9% in 2016

Quote:

---

Group 2. 19 Electors.
GA, MT.
These 2 have voted for GOP in each election since 1982 except for 1992. Both can be assumed to go for GOP in 2016, although GA had only an 8% margin in 2012. They had 16 Electors in 1980.

---

GA 5.1% in 2016

Quote:

---

Group 3. 59 Electors.
TN, AZ, MO, LA, KY, AR, WV.
These states have voted for GOP in almost all elections since 1979 except for the Perot years, 1992 & 1996. They also each have a margin in 2012 of 9% or more. They are likely to vote GOP in 2016.

Group 4. 26 Electors.
NC, IN.
These 2 states have voted Right every election since 1979 except 2008. In 2012 IN voted R by a margin of 10%, and 2008 voted D by a margin of 1.0%. NC voted R in 2012 by a margin or 2% and in 2008 voted D by a margin of 0.32%. These would likely vote Republican if there was a decent candidate.

5. 29 Electors.
FL*.
Florida has voted R since 1979 except 1996, 2008, and 2012. The margin in 2012 was 0.9%. This would easily go to Republican if a decent candidate was available. Florida had 17 Electors in 1980.

---

FL 1.2% in 2016

Groups 1-5: 235 Electors, 25 States.


I'll insert a Group 10 here - the States which went to Trump but trended Dem.

OH - 18 EV. 8.1% to Trump.
WI - 10 EV. 0.77%
IA - 6 EV. 9.4%
PA - 20 EV 0.71%
MI - 16 EV 0.22%

If Trump retains OH and IA, that adds up to 259 Electors.
Another 11 Electoral Votes wins him another 4 years.

Quote:

---

6. 40 22 Electors.
CO*, VA, OH*.
These 3 States usually vote for the winner since 1979, and in 2012 voted Dem by a margin ranging between 3% and 5%. A decent candidate would put these back in the GOP column. Ohio has lost 28% of it's Elector count since 1980.

---

CO 4.9%, VA 5.3%

Quote:

---

Group 7. 57 21 Electors.
NM*, MN, WI, IA, NV*, PA.
Other than the Reagan/Bush41 years, these states have mostly voted for Dems since then, and in 2012 had margins of between 5% and 10% for Obama. These would likely vote Democrat if there was a decent candidate. This group had 63 Electors in 1980.

---

NM 8.2%, MN 1.51%, NV 2.4%

Quote:

---

Group 8. 31 15 Electors.
MI, OR, NH*, ME
These states have voted for Democrats since 1990, and had a large margin in 2012, with MI the tightest margin at 10%. These are likely to go to Democrats in 2016. This group had 35 Electors in 1980.

---

OR 11%, NH 0.37%, ME 2.96%

Quote:

---

Group 9. 175 Electors.
CA, NY, IL, NJ, WA, MA, MD, CT, VT, HI, RI, DE, DC.
These states have voted for Democrats in every Presidential election since 1990. Unless the GOP puts up somebody similar to the most conservative of recent history - Reagan - these states are likely to stick with the Democrats. This makes them useless in terms of campaigning - no need to spend money or time in these states, other than to raise money to spend in other, competitive states. This group had 187 Electors in 1980, and other than CA and WA have lost 25 Electors as a group. Their liberalism has decimated their states, shunning prosperity, turning their back on progress, forcing populations to go elsewhere like conservative states, but they drag along their inept liberal thinking so they can destroy their new homes like they did the place they left.


States with an asterisk have voted for the winner in almost all elections since 1979. Only OH and NV have voted for the winner in every election since 1979, and OH since 1963.

Groups 1-6 would garner 275 Electors for the GOP, winning the Presidency. A reasonable expectation.

Regarding Electoral shift since 1980, the States with the largest percentage increase of Electors are NV 100%, AZ 83%, FL 71%, UT 50%, TX 46%, GA 33%, which are in groups 1-6 except NV.
The states with the largest percentage loss of Electors are NY 29%, OH 28%, PA 26%, IA 25%, MI 24%, IL 23%, which are in groups 6-9 and vote Democrat more often.

---

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Of course, no state has voted for Democrats in every elections since 1971, but Minnesota has done so for every election after 1972. Even when the most conservative President we've had in modern times was running, every other state voted for Reagan, but not MN. But they only had an 8 percent margin in 2012, meaning that if 4% of their voters had shifted, the state would have gone to Romney. In 2008 they had a margin of 10%.

Consider these groups of states.
Group 1. 102 Electors.
TX, SC, AL, OK, UT, KS, MS, NE, ID, WY, ND, SD, AK.
These states have voted Republican in every election since 1979, and the closest margin in 2012 was SC with 10%. Most people can assume they will go to the GOP in 2016. This group had 91 Electors in 1980, but they have embraced progress and Free Enterprise and flourished, expanding their proportional population.

---

TX 9% in 2016

Quote:

---

Group 2. 19 Electors.
GA, MT.
These 2 have voted for GOP in each election since 1982 except for 1992. Both can be assumed to go for GOP in 2016, although GA had only an 8% margin in 2012. They had 16 Electors in 1980.

---

GA 5.1% in 2016

Quote:

---

Group 3. 59 Electors.
TN, AZ, MO, LA, KY, AR, WV.
These states have voted for GOP in almost all elections since 1979 except for the Perot years, 1992 & 1996. They also each have a margin in 2012 of 9% or more. They are likely to vote GOP in 2016.

Group 4. 26 Electors.
NC, IN.
These 2 states have voted Right every election since 1979 except 2008. In 2012 IN voted R by a margin of 10%, and 2008 voted D by a margin of 1.0%. NC voted R in 2012 by a margin or 2% and in 2008 voted D by a margin of 0.32%. These would likely vote Republican if there was a decent candidate.

5. 29 Electors.
FL*.
Florida has voted R since 1979 except 1996, 2008, and 2012. The margin in 2012 was 0.9%. This would easily go to Republican if a decent candidate was available. Florida had 17 Electors in 1980.

---

FL 1.2% in 2016

Groups 1-5: 235 Electors, 25 States.


I'll insert a Group 10 here - the States which went to Trump but trended Dem.

OH - 18 EV. 8.1% to Trump.
WI - 10 EV. 0.77%
IA - 6 EV. 9.4%
PA - 20 EV 0.71%
MI - 16 EV 0.22%

If Trump retains OH and IA, that adds up to 259 Electors.
Another 11 Electoral Votes wins him another 4 years.

Quote:

---

6. 40 22 Electors.
CO*, VA, OH*.
These 3 States usually vote for the winner since 1979, and in 2012 voted Dem by a margin ranging between 3% and 5%. A decent candidate would put these back in the GOP column. Ohio has lost 28% of it's Elector count since 1980.

---

CO 4.9%, VA 5.3%

Quote:

---

Group 7. 57 21 Electors.
NM*, MN, WI, IA, NV*, PA.
Other than the Reagan/Bush41 years, these states have mostly voted for Dems since then, and in 2012 had margins of between 5% and 10% for Obama. These would likely vote Democrat if there was a decent candidate. This group had 63 Electors in 1980.

---

NM 8.2%, MN 1.51%, NV 2.4%

Quote:

---

Group 8. 31 15 Electors.
MI, OR, NH*, ME
These states have voted for Democrats since 1990, and had a large margin in 2012, with MI the tightest margin at 10%. These are likely to go to Democrats in 2016. This group had 35 Electors in 1980.

---

OR 11%, NH 0.37%, ME 2.96%

Quote:

---

Group 9. 175 Electors.
CA, NY, IL, NJ, WA, MA, MD, CT, VT, HI, RI, DE, DC.
These states have voted for Democrats in every Presidential election since 1990. Unless the GOP puts up somebody similar to the most conservative of recent history - Reagan - these states are likely to stick with the Democrats. This makes them useless in terms of campaigning - no need to spend money or time in these states, other than to raise money to spend in other, competitive states. This group had 187 Electors in 1980, and other than CA and WA have lost 25 Electors as a group. Their liberalism has decimated their states, shunning prosperity, turning their back on progress, forcing populations to go elsewhere like conservative states, but they drag along their inept liberal thinking so they can destroy their new homes like they did the place they left.



States with an asterisk have voted for the winner in almost all elections since 1979. Only OH and NV have voted for the winner in every election since 1979, and OH since 1963.

Groups 1-6 would garner 275 Electors for the GOP, winning the Presidency. A reasonable expectation.

Regarding Electoral shift since 1980, the States with the largest percentage increase of Electors are NV 100%, AZ 83%, FL 71%, UT 50%, TX 46%, GA 33%, which are in groups 1-6 except NV.
The states with the largest percentage loss of Electors are NY 29%, OH 28%, PA 26%, IA 25%, MI 24%, IL 23%, which are in groups 6-9 and vote Democrat more often.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
WI is unlikely to get an unfraudulent Election. RINOs of WI are led by Speaker Robin Vos, who is protecting Fraudster-in-Chief Megan Wolfe. So this is likely to stay in the Libtard column, for 233 EV total.

ME might be a tossup, but for now let's assume it stays Libtard. At least 236 EV total.


Let's look at the rest. How much Libtard Election Fraud is needed to Steal again?

PA (19)

GA (16)

MI (15)

AZ (11)

NV (6)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I heard Trump is polling up 12% in NV and AZ.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
In the last few hours, 270towin moved ME to the tossup column.
All 4 EVs, from 4 for Biden to 4 tossup.
I had heard ME was trending to Trump, but conjured it was 3 EVs, with 1 staying Libtard.

But for both Districts to switch to sense at once? That is impressive.

When this happened, their totals had 81 tossup. A few hours ago, it was 77 EV tossup. An earlier version I noticed was 61 tossup, missing GA.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
In the last few hours, 270towin moved ME to the tossup column.
All 4 EVs, from 4 for Biden to 4 tossup.
I had heard ME was trending to Trump, but conjured it was 3 EVs, with 1 staying Libtard.

But for both Districts to switch to sense at once? That is impressive.

When this happened, their totals had 81 tossup. A few hours ago, it was 77 EV tossup. An earlier version I noticed was 61 tossup, missing GA.

---

I was referring to the chart map at 270towin.com
But there is another at 270towin.com/news/

https://uselectionatlas.org/

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Some folk are still claiming that WI will go to Trump in November.
But WI just had their primary on 13 August, and the results should prove this a fallacy. No matter how many votes for Trump are cast (again, a record number) the vote counters will ensure Biden has a higher count. Or Newsome, Witless, Oprah, whomever is on the ballot come Nov.
The corrupt Wisconsin Republican Party is working feverishly to make sure Trump does not win.

On Tuesday, there was a Republican Primary for the Senate race. Statewide totals were about 518,000 for this race.
So, a reasonable person could suss out that the Honest Votes would be similar for the "Yes" votes for the Constitutional Amendments to stop the Libtard Gov Evers from usurping the Power of The Purse from the Constitutionally specified Legislature, and dispersing the taxpayers candy to his crooked cronies all the time.
They totalled about 520,000 for one, and 522,000 for the other. That fairly accounts for the Honest Vote.

So, in a closed Primary election, where there are practically no Dems in contested races, how can they manage to generate over 700,000 "votes" to defeat these Amendments - and keep their Partytime Fund filled with taxpayer confiscated funds?
Well, this is why we needed to distribute the Unconstitutional Ballot Drop Boxes, yet again. But only in Milwaukee and Madison. So that any random passerby can drop in as many ballots as they so desire during the weeks of collection.
Are you them surprised that these 2 Counties account for all of the FAKE Vote margin in the Referendum? Some might claim these 2 counties did not account for the 180,000 vote margin - well, OK, so them Rock and Eay Claire Counties helped out, too.
The other 68 Counties collectively voted "Yes"

Anybody who wants to claim the exact same Election Steal won't happen in Nov is delusional.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Talk all the shit you want to but remember this. This time Biden is president until the next president takes office. When Trump loses, and he will lose, he will be without the power of the presidency from which to mount a coup. And he will not be immune in any way to what he instigates.

tick tock clown

T

Trump BLINDSIDED by Kamala LEGAL MOVE to END His Scheme

]

---

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Reports are that 3 Libtard Democrap US Senators are using Trump in their campaign ads - in positive light, they worked with him (although they actually didn't).
Baldwin - WI
Casey - PA
Sherrod Brown - OH.

WI and PA are labelled swing states, all are jettisoning Kamala.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2024/polls.php

---

Quote:

---

Bring at least one person with you when you vote, and tell everyone you talk to from now until the polls close on the 5th the same thing.

Being that you're a Wisconsin resident, your vote and the people you make sure go out and vote are far more important than anybody's votes in my circles outside of Popular Vote bragging rights. Despite the current conditions, it would still take a miracle for Trump to flip Illinois, and there's zero chance Indiana ever goes Harris. I hope you can manage to drag a person or two with you that have a proclivity to tell you that they're going to do something but usually don't end up doing it when the time comes. Those are the votes I'm hoping are coming out a lot harder than they usually do in 2024.

I've got a good feeling about it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2024/polls.php

---

I added this to the bottom of my last post after you posted this link:

Quote:

---

Bring at least one person with you when you vote, and tell everyone you talk to from now until the polls close on the 5th the same thing.

Being that you're a Wisconsin resident, your vote and the people you make sure go out and vote are far more important than anybody's votes in my circles outside of Popular Vote bragging rights. Despite the current conditions, it would still take a miracle for Trump to flip Illinois, and there's zero chance Indiana ever goes Harris. I hope you can manage to drag a person or two with you that have a proclivity to tell you that they're going to do something but usually don't end up doing it when the time comes. Those are the votes I'm hoping are coming out a lot harder than they usually do in 2024.

I've got a good feeling about it.

---

Since this was written specifically to you, I wanted to make sure you saw it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
If you really believe all of that is true, why bother paying attention to anything at all?

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
My old man voted the day they opened the polls. Said he had to wait an hour to vote.

I laughed at that and told him that in all the times I've ever voted in my life combined I wasn't there an hour.
My protest vote this year is voting on Election Day.

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Maricopa Co has already announced that, after Republicans are done voting on Nov 5th, it will take them another 10-13 days to create enough Fake Ballots to finish counting the votes.
Meanwhile, the entire state of Florida will have complete results within hours.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Maricopa Co has already announced that, after Republicans are done voting on Nov 5th, it will take them another 10-13 days to create enough Fake Ballots to finish counting the votes.
Meanwhile, the entire state of Florida will have complete results within hours.

---

Michigan has also announced it will take them several days after Republicans are done voting before they can fabricate enough fraudulent ballots and finish their count.
Maybe they need to translate from the official language of Dearbornistan.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Latest polls are claiming a dead heat in nationwide polling - meaning a tie in the popular vote. This would imply that all of the swing states would go to Trump, but the polls are claiming that all swing states are also tied.
That seems improbable.

I am hoping that America can still be saved, and the results known before midnight Tuesday.

The Wisconsin RINO Party has been working all year to rig the election and prevent Trump form winning WI. Unfortunately, a side effect of this process is that they will help the 3 Libtards on the ballot defeat Hovde for Senator. The polls are too close, and if correct then not enough honest votes will be present to overcome the fraud.

MI, PA, and Maricopa have already announced that they will need extra days or weeks (after 5 Nov) to steal the election in their states.

Nevada judge has already explained how they will be stealing the election there, up to Friday or Saturday.

No reasonable person seems to think NC is going to Kamala.
I have been assuming GA was going to Trump. Even with the Georgia Libtards stealing the weekend, in only Dem Counties, creating Extra Voting Days (without authorization from the Legislature), and allowing only thieving Observers (no honest, conservative, or Republican Observers were allowed), it is still possible GA goes to Trump.

So, if Trump flips VA and NM, he gets 269 Electoral Votes - a tie in the College. So he wins election in the House.
If he also flips ME, that is 2 EV.
Flipping NH gets another 4 EV.
Flipping Omaha gets 1 EV.

And then WI, MI, PA, AZ, NV can go pound sand.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Latest polls are claiming a dead heat in nationwide polling - meaning a tie in the popular vote. This would imply that all of the swing states would go to Trump, but the polls are claiming that all swing states are also tied.
That seems improbable.

I am hoping that America can still be saved, and the results known before midnight Tuesday.

The Wisconsin RINO Party has been working all year to rig the election and prevent Trump form winning WI. Unfortunately, a side effect of this process is that they will help the 3 Libtards on the ballot defeat Hovde for Senator. The polls are too close, and if correct then not enough honest votes will be present to overcome the fraud.

MI, PA, and Maricopa have already announced that they will need extra days or weeks (after 5 Nov) to steal the election in their states.

Nevada judge has already explained how they will be stealing the election there, up to Friday or Saturday.

No reasonable person seems to think NC is going to Kamala.
I have been assuming GA was going to Trump. Even with the Georgia Libtards stealing the weekend, in only Dem Counties, creating Extra Voting Days (without authorization from the Legislature), and allowing only thieving Observers (no honest, conservative, or Republican Observers were allowed), it is still possible GA goes to Trump.

So, if Trump flips VA and NM, he gets 269 Electoral Votes - a tie in the College. So he wins election in the House.
If he also flips ME, that is 2 EV.
Flipping NH gets another 4 EV.
Flipping Omaha gets 1 EV.

And then WI, MI, PA, AZ, NV can go pound sand.

---

If ME, NH flip, and VA and GA are for Trump, then we won't need to wait to find out if NM flips.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
The polls, even though all the aggregates show Trump winning right now, are all lies. They don't reflect just how much of a blowout this is going to be. Trump is about to destroy Kamala in a way that most living Americans haven't witnessed. It's happened before in my lifetime, but most things political went way over my head when I was still in diapers.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

WI voted for Trump, but defeated Hovde. Baldwin got less than 50%. The extra votes for Baldwin appeared in Milwaukee, where there were voting irregularities on Election Day - apparently Milwaukee was allowd to have "special change in Election Rules only for Election Day" or somesuch.

---