Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Nobody knows what you're talking about Ted. Nobody cares enough to ask you either, and they're certainly not interested in watching whatever clickbait you're posting from a channel that's gotten every prediction they've made since November wrong.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/justice-department-subpoenas-letitia-jame
s-trump-civil-rights/

https://www.coastreporter.net/world-news/justice-department-subpoenas-
new-york-ag-james-as-it-investigates-whether-she-violated-trump-rights-11051070

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/doj-issues-subpoenas-york-attorney-154015697
.html

"A spokesperson for James called the subpoenas a "weaponization of the justice system," invoking a criticism Trump used to describe her case against him"

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Nobody knows what you're talking about Ted. Nobody cares enough to ask you either, and they're certainly not interested in watching whatever clickbait you're posting from a channel that's gotten every prediction they've made since November wrong.

---

---

Quote:

---

Appeals Court Nukes Boasberg's Contempt Order In Trump Admin Deportations Case

Earlier this year, Boasberg said he found probable cause to hold the administration in contempt because it purportedly violated his orders to halt deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.

However in a 2–1 decision on Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit indicated that Boasberg went too far. Judge Gregory Katsas said that one of Boasberg’s orders could have been read in different ways.

... [therefore] "the government’s initial implementation of the proclamation clearly and indisputably was not criminal."

... Judge Neomi Rao described Boasberg’s decision as an “egregious” abuse of the court’s contempt power and said Boasberg had lost the authority to try and “coerce compliance” with his original order. That’s because his initial halts on the deportations had been vacated by the Supreme Court in another decision from April.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
District Judge Boasberg, the one who issued a nationwide injunction on deportation (vacated by the Supreme Court) also attempted to slap Trump with contempt of court for not following his order. An appeals court ruled against Boasberg.

Quote:

---

Appeals Court Nukes Boasberg's Contempt Order In Trump Admin Deportations Case

Earlier this year, Boasberg said he found probable cause to hold the administration in contempt because it purportedly violated his orders to halt deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.

However in a 2–1 decision on Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit indicated that Boasberg went too far. Judge Gregory Katsas said that one of Boasberg’s orders could have been read in different ways.

... [therefore] "the government’s initial implementation of the proclamation clearly and indisputably was not criminal."

... Judge Neomi Rao described Boasberg’s decision as an “egregious” abuse of the court’s contempt power and said Boasberg had lost the authority to try and “coerce compliance” with his original order. That’s because his initial halts on the deportations had been vacated by the Supreme Court in another decision from April.

---

MORE AT https://www.zerohedge.com/political/appeals-court-nukes-boasbergs-cont
empt-order-trump-admin-deportations-case


-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

THGR claims I have no morels, and he's absolutely right.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
District Judge Boasberg, the one who issued a nationwide injunction on deportation (vacated by the Supreme Court) also attempted to slap Trump with contempt of court for not following his order. An appeals court ruled against Boasberg.

Quote:

---

Appeals Court Nukes Boasberg's Contempt Order In Trump Admin Deportations Case

Earlier this year, Boasberg said he found probable cause to hold the administration in contempt because it purportedly violated his orders to halt deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.

However in a 2–1 decision on Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit indicated that Boasberg went too far. Judge Gregory Katsas said that one of Boasberg’s orders could have been read in different ways.

... [therefore] "the government’s initial implementation of the proclamation clearly and indisputably was not criminal."

... Judge Neomi Rao described Boasberg’s decision as an “egregious” abuse of the court’s contempt power and said Boasberg had lost the authority to try and “coerce compliance” with his original order. That’s because his initial halts on the deportations had been vacated by the Supreme Court in another decision from April.

---

MORE AT https://www.zerohedge.com/political/appeals-court-nukes-boasbergs-cont
empt-order-trump-admin-deportations-case
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

THGR claims I have no morels, and he's absolutely right.

---

Quote:

---

In a split decision, appellate Judge George Katsas — a Trump appointee — said Boasberg’s decision represented an “improper use of the contempt power” since the US Supreme Court had already lifted Boasberg’s ban on the flights before the district judge ordered the feds to “purge their contempt.”

Boasberg — a Barack Obama appointee — ordered Trump administration lawyers to either retake custody of the deported migrants so they could continue fighting their immigration case in the US or identify the officials who had defied his order.

“The government correctly says it has been put to a Hobson’s choice: comply with an invalid order or name Executive Branch officials for the initiation of criminal contempt proceedings,” Katsas wrote. “The proffered choice impermissibly commingles civil and criminal contempt in a manner that results in substantial prejudice to the government.

“Compounding this error, the district court’s order attempts to control the Executive Branch’s conduct of foreign affairs, an area in which a court’s power is at its lowest ebb,” Katsas added.

Judge Cornelia Pillard, an Obama appointee, dissented, writing: “Our system of courts cannot long endure if disappointed litigants defy court orders with impunity rather than legally challenge them. That is why willful disobedience of a court order is punishable as criminal contempt.”

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I heard Gay Marriage is on it's way back to SCOTUS. Libtard heads will explode.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Sounds good...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I heard Gay Marriage is on it's way back to SCOTUS. Libtard heads will explode.

---

If true, this is a losing issue for Republicans. I don't see why Republicans always go out of their way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, every single time. It's going to be bad enough for them once millions of American Citizens start losing Medicaid in late 2026. Especially when they're still (always) going to have to deal with the issue of Abortion. There is zero reason to add this bullshit on top of the reasons the Democrats can pull a coalition back together when they're blowing up in front of our faces on their own so splendidly right now.

This is an example of over-correction. I couldn't give a shit less who somebody is having sex with as long as they're adults and one isn't raping the other... and I don't have to fucking see it or hear about it. I'm just tired of it being crammed in everyone's faces in every single commercial break sandwiched between every single show they've been put in. Literally every show, and we just always have to talk about it.


The LGB need to cut the rest of the freaks off and take back their own victories for themselves, and then just STFU and live their lives and stop bothering everyone else. I think most of them do that already and would be happy just to live their lives without constantly making a fuss as long as they're not being fucked with. It's MEDIA in all its forms today that is the problem and how they put all this fucking nonsense at the end of the LGB movement, and the gays just sat back and allowed that to happen. We were probably only a year or two away from adding NAMBLA to the Gay flag, the way things were going before November.

I don't see any reason to punish the gays. We're just finished watching them swing their junk all over the place in their "Pride" parades in front of children and all the other sick shit the clingers-on have been up to all this time.

I think most folk are pretty chill and normal. Even the gay ones, dude.


In any event. I'm going on the record as stating that I have no interest in seeing any challenges to the legalization of gay marriage making their way to the Supreme Court. I'm fine with gay marriage.

By all means, if you're a church/religion who doesn't believe that it's right, you should be able to deny a marriage service or even remove people from your flock if they come out as gay. It's not like there aren't pop-up churches all over the place that haven't embraced it and won't marry you. There are plenty of choices.

And if you're a self-owned business like those cake bakers that didn't want to make a cake with "Adam and Steve" on top because of their own religious and moral belief system, they should be able to make that choice to lose that business as well. I'm happy that they're making enough money in the 2020's that they can afford to turn anyone away. Good for them.

There are plenty of places to go to get a cake baked. Go somewhere else. Tell the holier-than-thou Christians to go fuck themselves on your way out the door if it makes you feel better, but then drop it. Don't go on a decade's long crusade to ruin those people or try to get a video of you being an asshole viral online.



My only real sticking point is the adoption issue...

I honestly don't know what stance I would take on that and couldn't give a good answer if pressed. My parents were heterosexual and absolutely sucked at that job, and I'm hardly in the minority. I never bothered trying myself either, so it's not as if I have any input.

But I do think that the issue is tricky as all hell because the sheer nature of the whole debate revolves around sex and sexuality, and now you're bringing kids into the mix.

Priests in the Catholic church have been raping young boys on the sly for hundreds of years and it only started coming out about how the Church had not only been covering that up every time it happened, but they kept those priests in rotation and they'd go and rape some boys somewhere else.

And these are so-called People of God who abstain from sex willingly. Heh... Okay.


But monstrous behavior or not, we're talking about kids in their developmental years. Every fiber of my being is irked out just by the mere thought of kids being raised by two gay people, but without much in the way of anything positive coming from the other side, both in my own life and when viewing American Society in general for nearly half a century now, I find myself reaching in my pockets for ammo and all my pockets are coming up empty here.

It is a debate that is going to have to happen in the near future. I think we'll probably have more data as time goes on to draw from that should help.

But once again, CUT THE CRAZIES OFF OF THE END OF THE LGB. This is your Single Biggest Reason to do so, gay people. If you ever want to have a chance at normalizing the idea of children being adopted and raised by gay couples, you've got to be normal. I think most of you do this already, but you have to stand up and speak out against the other "things" that have become barnacles on your movement and are just generally abhorrant to the vast, vast majority of people.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

---