REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

The culpability at the state and federal levels in the New Orleans assistance debacle (cont.)

POSTED BY: CHRISISALL
UPDATED: Sunday, September 11, 2005 08:41
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 8898
PAGE 2 of 3

Tuesday, September 6, 2005 6:00 PM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by SevenPercent:

In your little universe, Bush and the federal government get a free pass on everything, don't they? Just like I said, he could gun down a busload of nuns on Constitution Ave at high noon on a Sunday and you'd find a way to spin it.



Religious zealots who've never held a paying job and have puritanical view on mainstream issues such as sex, capitalism, welfare, and violance; not to mention dressed in gang colors making their way to capital for unknown reasons on a day of spiritual signifigance to their religeon.

The question was about the biggest factor. I certainly agree that FEMA had administrative difficulties not addressed by its planning (I took the NEMS test and studied the National Response Plan, I know). Also there were certain legal issues that prevented effective response by federal military authority until Thurday night and Friday.

But I cannot help but come back to the Mayor of New Orleans lining up people by the tens of thousands outside the Superdome on Sunday and not using city and school buses to get some of those people out. He also directed his officers to concentrate on life saving (a laudible goal) and not looting which lead to widespread violence.

Nor can I overlook the fact that the Governor of LA failed to implement her evacuation until a last minute personal call was made to her from the President. She did not activate her emergency center until hours before the storm hit, she failed to include FEMA in her emergency center, she failed to make a timely deployment of national guard into affected areas, she did not enact an emergency order giving the guard power to confiscate private property (like buses) until Wednesday. She mismanaged the crisis at every level from 72 hours before until 48 hours after the storm hit. I don't know if she's republican or democrat, it doesn't matter, she screwed up from left to right and top to bottom.

The President, on the other hand, was on top of things as much as the President could be. He authorized the redeployment of military and federal assets before and after the storm. He coordinated with FEMA and the National Weather Service to issue the proper warnings and when they were ignored he made personal calls to the Mayor and Governor to get them off their asses. When FEMA's communication and management failed the President began making preparations to turn control over to the military and Lt. General Honore, but was unable to do so till Thursday night. The President directed efforts to coordinate interstate relief efforts and its no surprise that Texas, who emergency plans and capability the former Governor was most familiar with, was the first to come foreward with a state level response.

Lets face it, the President could save millions of people from the hands of a brutal dictator and you would find a way to spin it negatively. For most of you its not about the Hurricane, the war, or even 9/11. Its about 2000 and you can't get past it. I don't even think its the election, I think its that moment, you remember, during one of the debates when Gore is following Bush around and Bush turns, gives him the up and down look and a majority in most of the states all looked at their TV and said 'he just won the election'. I said it and I was right. Once more I thank God we elected Bush. Gore would be curled up in a fetal position right now begging Saddam and Bin Ladden to spare us the wrath of Allah's hurricanes. Kerry would be sailing his swiftboat into the delta looking for Charlie (literally, I'm sure some guy named Charlie is missing down there somewhere).

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 6, 2005 7:34 PM

CANTTAKESKY


In case anyone is interested in an alternative viewpoint in the finger-pointing, read this. It is incredible.

http://www.getyouracton.com/blog/

"So many stories of relief efforts being turned away. Wildlife and Fisheries who had a couple hundred boats going into the lower 9th ward for the first two days, rescuing the people trapped in attics and on roofs - until they were ordered to stop. A group of Virginia State troopers who came down with a truckload of supplies to help NOPD - who were stopped at the perimeter of New Orleans and ordered to go away. A US Naval hospital ship with 400 beds, doctors, helicopters, all sorts of equipment - they were in the gulf when the storm hit and were the first to arrive in the area - they are sitting empty, not allowed to help."

This goes way, way beyond "Oh we didn't know the levees would break." The authorities are actively prohibiting help from getting through. They have their reasons of course (violence, health, safety, the usual). But however they spin it, it's wrong.

And what about the boldfaced lie that they didn't know the levees would break? I don't know if anyone remembers the news on Tuesday morning after Katrina. Many parts of New Orleans was still dry because flooding had not yet begun from the breached levees. Per the established hurricane response plan, Mayor Nagin had arranged to drop sandbags on breached levees ASAP to prevent widespread flooding. But those helicopters were DIVERTED for search and rescue missions, and Nagin was furious when he was interviewed on the news. Someone (he didn't say who) had decided it was more important to pluck people from rooftops that day than to prevent mass destruction of the rest of the city and flooding that could take even more lives. Had those choppers been allowed to immediately repair those levees, is it possible that New Orleans could be more habitable now? Who made this decision and why? Why aren't people and media calling for accountability for this deviation from established emergency protocol? Why was this story completely dropped after the first mention?

This isn't just about sins of omission. There are sins of commission here. Katrina did her bit. But people did the rest.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 6, 2005 8:07 PM

SEVENPERCENT


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
Nor can I overlook the fact that the Governor of LA failed to implement her evacuation until a last minute personal call was made to her from the President. She did not activate her emergency center until hours before the storm hit, she failed to include FEMA in her emergency center, she failed to make a timely deployment of national guard into affected areas, she did not enact an emergency order giving the guard power to confiscate private property (like buses) until Wednesday. She mismanaged the crisis at every level from 72 hours before until 48 hours after the storm hit. I don't know if she's republican or democrat, it doesn't matter, she screwed up from left to right and top to bottom.



...and had you read that link I posted, you'll see that all of these responsibilities (besides one, but I'll get to that) resided with the federal government once she called for help on the 26th, which you must have forgotten from your FEMA course. The evacuation order is a common sense issue - people leaving their homes days before the hurricane hit? That's asking for widespread looting on a scale beyond what even happened. She had to be dead sure the thing was going to hit. That's part of the problem with any evacuation. Did she wait too long? Might have, and if so, she's to blame for some of the problems. I don't deny her culpability. But you cannot sit there and argue that La., even with the best of planning, was prepared to handle a Category 5 hurricane. That's the job of the federal government. It's why we have a FEMA and a DHLS.

Quote:

The President, on the other hand, was on top of things as much as the President could be. He authorized the redeployment of military and federal assets before and after the storm. He coordinated with FEMA and the National Weather Service to issue the proper warnings and when they were ignored he made personal calls to the Mayor and Governor to get them off their asses. When FEMA's communication and management failed the President began making preparations to turn control over to the military and Lt. General Honore, but was unable to do so till Thursday night. The President directed efforts to coordinate interstate relief efforts and its no surprise that Texas, who emergency plans and capability the former Governor was most familiar with, was the first to come foreward with a state level response.


You won't even acknowledge the fact that Bush's incorporation of FEMA into the DHLS and the appointment of 'Brownie,' a man with no experience, was a blunder of epic proportions. How can you defend that mistake? You cannot, so you'll keep ignoring it. Brownie's workin' hard, cause it's hard work to work so hard at stuff (as our fearless leader would say).
Besides that, to match every pic you can show me of the buses, I can match one of Bush playing the goddamn guitar while people were fighting for their lives (and as I've said before, even with telecommunications being what they are in this day and age, the seat of gov't is still Washington, not click-click bloody Crawford *Family Guy ref*) Not to mention Dick the Disappearing. Anyone seen him lately?
I saw a DHLS chief who said he was getting hurricane news from the FRIGGIN' PAPER, as did Brown, but at least Chertoff got the headlines right. They didn't even know about convention center refugees, and claimed their people couldnt get into the area. How can Sanjay Gupta from CNN get in 2 days after a hurricane, but the national guard cannot? I call foul; it's a federal fubar, post-disaster.

Quote:

Lets face it, the President could save millions of people from the hands of a brutal dictator and you would find a way to spin it negatively.


Now it's humanitarian reasons? I thought it was WMD's. Who knows, it changes every week. How's about this spin for ya - The 3 southern states hit the hardest by the hurricane had their national guard responses handcuffed by a lack of available troops and materials. Where were they? Ah, that's right, the middle of the desert, creating an Al-Quaida training ground. But that's for another thread entirely.

Quote:

For most of you its not about the Hurricane, the war, or even 9/11. Its about 2000 and you can't get past it.


Oh my God, I almost pissed myself laughing when I read this. All he's done is screw up (as well as be completely opposed to most of the things I believe, such as freedom of choice and anything involving science), but you think it's about an election. This from the side of the political spectrum that screams "Clinton did it too" whenever they get in trouble (how's that for not getting past things- holy cow). As I've said before, for the cons who did nothing but bash how immoral and corrupt Clinton was, you sure seem to try and hold the moral high ground while doing the same stuff. I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.

Quote:

Kerry would be sailing his swiftboat into the delta looking for Charlie (literally, I'm sure some guy named Charlie is missing down there somewhere).


Because in a time of crisis, a man who actually had the balls to serve in the military would cower. What we needed was a real leader, one who hid in Alabama from his guard duties and who plays dress up for carrier photo ops to lead us. Might explain why things in this country are such a clusterfark right now.



------------------------------------------
He looked bigger when I couldn't see him.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 6, 2005 8:16 PM

HKCAVALIER


Some good stuff over at Keith Olbermann's blog. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8514671/#050905a
Here's a snip:
Quote:

But, nationally, these are leaders who won re-election last year largely by portraying their opponents as incapable of keeping the country safe. These are leaders who regularly pressure the news media in this country to report the reopening of a school or a power station in Iraq, and defies its citizens not to stand up and cheer. Yet they couldn't even keep one school or power station from being devastated by infrastructure collapse in New Orleans — even though the government had heard all the "chatter" from the scientists and city planners and hurricane centers and some group whose purposes the government couldn't quite discern... a group called The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

And most chillingly of all, this is the Law and Order and Terror government. It promised protection — or at least amelioration — against all threats: conventional, radiological, or biological.

It has just proved that it cannot save its citizens from a biological weapon called standing water.

Mr. Bush has now twice insisted that, "we are not satisfied," with the response to the manifold tragedies along the Gulf Coast. I wonder which "we" he thinks he's speaking for on this point. Perhaps it's the administration, although we still don't know where some of them are. Anybody seen the Vice President lately? The man whose message this time last year was, 'I'll Protect You, The Other Guy Will Let You Die'?

I don't know which 'we' Mr. Bush meant.

For many of this country's citizens, the mantra has been — as we were taught in Social Studies it should always be — whether or not I voted for this President — he is still my President. I suspect anybody who had to give him that benefit of the doubt stopped doing so last week. I suspect a lot of his supporters, looking ahead to '08, are wondering how they can distance themselves from the two words which will define his government — our government — "New Orleans."

For him, it is a shame — in all senses of the word. A few changes of pronouns in there, and he might not have looked so much like a 21st Century Marie Antoinette. All that was needed was just a quick "I'm not satisfied with my government's response." Instead of hiding behind phrases like "no one could have foreseen," had he only remembered Winston Churchill's quote from the 1930's. "The responsibility," of government, Churchill told the British Parliament "for the public safety is absolute and requires no mandate. It is in fact, the prime object for which governments come into existence."

In forgetting that, the current administration did not merely damage itself — it damaged our confidence in our ability to rely on whoever is in the White House.





HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 6, 2005 8:58 PM

SOUPCATCHER


Random thoughts in no particular order.

** There are two statements that I've heard over and over the past few days from administration supporters: Now is not the time for blame; It's the fault of the mayor and the governor. I don't vote for the mayor of New Orleans or the governor of Louisiana. I do vote for the office of President. I expect my federal government to respond quickly to a huge crisis that is beyond the scope of what cities and states can handle. Big government handles big problems. Part of the disconnect I see is that many administration supporters do not like big government. They hail from the, "drown it in a bathtub" school of thought. Today, that Norquist quote seems almost prescient.

** We just recently watched Hotel Rwanda and one scene from that movie has been running through my head - the part where Don Cheadle's character exhorts everyone in the hotel to get on the phone and call anyone. He tells them that the only way they're going to get any help is to shame people into helping. To my mind, that's part of the reason why the federal government finally kicked things into gear. They were shamed by the images broadcasting worldwide by the cable news stations. We all were. From Thursday on, for the most part, the response on the federal level has been what I expect of my government. From Monday to Wednesday, not so much.

** I have found, with this administration, that the most truthful statements come in the immediate aftermath (not just in this situation, but in general). Once enough time has passed the party line comes down and public officials close ranks. The current leadership of the Republican party prides themselves on message discipline and we have now reached the point where the party line has been set. Early on in this disaster there was criticism of FEMA's actions from all sides. Today, the criticism is of the mayor and the governor. The attack machine has been reloaded and set loose. And, while they are attacking the mayor and the governor, they decry anyone attacking the President as engaging in partisan politics.

** I was driving back from Los Angeles Sunday evening hours before the hurricane hit the New Orleans area. The news throughout the entire drive was about the disaster that was coming for New Orleans in terms of flooding and the toxic soup of water that would carpet the city. And they had just started evacuating that day. I was floored (in pretty much the same way that Signym has related). There's no way you can evacuate a city of that many people in one day.

** When will the media wake up to the disinformation that they help to perpetuate by covering administration photo-ops uncritically? There's been a couple of examples over the past few days where the need to present a good visual actually hindered the relief efforts. Read this article from the Salt Lake Tribune (it's worth the read just for the more insight into how FEMA is using resources - but the last paragraph is particularly enlightening.
http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197
Quote:

excerpted from "Frustrated: Fire crews to hand out fliers for FEMA" at http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197
Not long after some 1,000 firefighters sat down for eight hours of training, the whispering began: "What are we doing here?"
As New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin pleaded on national television for firefighters - his own are exhausted after working around the clock for a week - a battalion of highly trained men and women sat idle Sunday in a muggy Sheraton Hotel conference room in Atlanta.
Many of the firefighters, assembled from Utah and throughout the United States by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, thought they were going to be deployed as emergency workers.
Instead, they have learned they are going to be community-relations officers for FEMA, shuffled throughout the Gulf Coast region to disseminate fliers and a phone number: 1-800-621-FEMA.
...
Firefighters say they want to brave the heat, the debris-littered roads, the poisonous cottonmouth snakes and fire ants and travel into pockets of Louisiana where many people have yet to receive emergency aid.
But as specific orders began arriving to the firefighters in Atlanta, a team of 50 Monday morning quickly was ushered onto a flight headed for Louisiana. The crew's first assignment: to stand beside President Bush as he tours devastated areas.


(thanks to Josh Marshall at TPM for the link). What's more important, working to improve the situation or posing for a picture? This, in a nutshell, is one of my hugest pet peeves with this administration: style is more important than substance. They create their own reality, which often has little to do with actual reality. And then they market that created reality to people who are only too happy to buy the farm.

** I don't know the exact details of the New Orleans levee system. It seems to me that the highest ground in the city is along the Mississippi River and the shore of Lake Pontchartrain. Are there canal style locks at the interface between the canals and those two bodies of water? It seems like that would be a logical line of defense. Just cut off all the canals from the lake and river. Especially since all the levee breaks occurred on canals inside the interior of the city. Then you only have to worry about rising water that will eventually recede rather than a breach that you have to repair. Not sure if that makes sense.

** And I'm still frustrated.

** And I applaud Hero's relief effort actions (and the actions of everyone who are doing/giving whatever they can).

* editted to add in quote

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 6, 2005 11:53 PM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
** I have found, with this administration, that the most truthful statements come in the immediate aftermath (not just in this situation, but in general). Once enough time has passed the party line comes down and public officials close ranks. The current leadership of the Republican party prides themselves on message discipline and we have now reached the point where the party line has been set. Early on in this disaster there was criticism of FEMA's actions from all sides. Today, the criticism is of the mayor and the governor. The attack machine has been reloaded and set loose. And, while they are attacking the mayor and the governor, they decry anyone attacking the President as engaging in partisan politics.


I'm feeling pretty optimistic, as far as it goes, that the admin. will not be getting a pass on this one. Mary and I have both been amazed to be seeing actual news on the television this past week; it's been so long, hasn't it? Since reporters reported what they saw, rather than what they were told? When reporters asked questions they actually wanted an answer to, and when they didn't get it, came back with another one? Politicians making fools of themselves and the press actually calling them on it (someone other than John Stewart, that is)? When was the last time we saw the press so pissed off?

I don't see anyone buying the blame the mayor and the governor talking point. Even Fox News knows it's b.s. That's why Bush & co. have had to fall back on the silly "blaming people is mean" talking point. It's just too appallingly absurd and irrelevant. It's gonna take a lot more than that to erase those crucial three days from the country's memory. And I don't see it happening. Bush's place in the history books will be exactly where it belongs, somewhere south of Herbert Hoover.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 12:24 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Bottom line. Near as I can tell, once the President has declared a national emergency (which he did for Louisiana on the 27th and Mississippi and Alabama on the 28th) FEMA becomes the responsible agency. So- what did FEMA do before landfall? Pretty much nothing, as far as I can tell. And after? Well... they DID interfere with independent efforts, like cutting Jefferson Parish's emergency communication lines w/o warning, turning back trucks of water, refusing to release diesel fuel that the Coast Guard had offered, and keeping the Red Cross out of the city

As far as using city and school buses to evacuate the city... the buses aren't going anywhere without drivers. The mayor MIGHT have had the authority to order city bus drivers to work during an evacuation, or he might not. Prolly not. He also prolly doesn't have authority over school bus drivers at all, if the NOLA school system runs like Los Angeles'.

There is another complicating factor- generally, the National Guard is under the governor's control except in times of war. During wartime, the President gains complete control over the national Guard. So "normally" the President lets governors request help from National Guard in other states although in emergnecies he has the authority to activate the National Guard on his own. Blanco, as far as I can tell, DID request National Guard from other states but that her requests sat on someone's desk in DC from the 26th until the 2nd.

But since we are at war (in Iraq) I think it was the President's duty to activate the National Guard in ALL states, as it was Blanco's duty to turn "hers" over to the Feds. Given everything, this seems more of a screwup at the Federal level. The sense that I'm getting is that the Federal government took on the authority for responding... to the point of sabotaging Jefferson Parish's emergency communication system, for example- but then did nothing for five days

Instead of arguing back and forth, how about coming up with a timeline of who did what when, and what it means.

Please don't think they give a shit.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 12:35 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


By the way, I just had oppty to talk with LA-area firefighters as well as Air Force stationed in San Antonio. The firefighters confirmed for me that their volunteers will be PASSING OUT PAPERWORK. They had gone to NOLA, they thought, to rescue people and to aid the survivors. But nope- FEMA apparently has a much better use for highly-trained emergency workers. Across the board, the people I spoke with ranged from disgust to anger at the Federal response. Unlike you and I, they KNOW what a response should look like and in their view this isn't it.

So- how about that timeline?

Please don't think they give a shit.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 12:56 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


TIMELINE

Saturday August 27th
LA declared an emergency by Bush beginning (retroactively?) August 26th. "The President today declared an emergency exists in the State of Louisiana and ordered Federal aid to supplement state and local response efforts in the parishes located in the path of Hurricane Katrina beginning on August 26, 2005, and continuing. The President's action authorizes the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to coordinate all disaster relief efforts...and to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act, to save lives, protect property and public health and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in the parishes of {list follows}... Specifically, FEMA is authorized to identify, mobilize, and provide at its discretion, equipment and resources necessary to alleviate the impacts of the emergency... Michael D. Brown...named William Lokey as the Federal Coordinating Officer for Federal recovery operations in the affected area." www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050827-1.html

August 28th
Bush declares Alabama and Mississipi disaster areas www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050828-3.html
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050828.html

Sunday, August 28, 2005 10:11 AM CDT
"Mayor Ray Nagin ordered a mandatory evacuation of the city of New Orleans in the face of Category-5 Katrina which was expected to make a direct strike on the city early Monday. Nagin said that the predicted tidal surges and heavy rains could mean widespread flooding and power outages that could last for some time. The order extends to everyone in the city of New Orleans with the following exceptions: Essential military and law enforcement personnel from the city and state, regulated utilities employees, essential members of the media, hospital employees and their patients, medical personnel, Criminal Sheriff's personnel and inmates and hotels and their patrons. Nagin said the city could and would commandeer any property or vehicle it deemed necessary to provide safe shelter or transport for those in need. He also opened the Louisiana Superdome as a shelter of last resort that would begin accepting people around Noon. He said the Dome would have few supplies and that people were expected to bring food and other necessary items. RTA buses were going to be sent to pick up those going to shelters at designated pickup points. Nagin discouraged staying in the Superdome, saying that people would not have access to power and possibly plumbing. His pickup spots were: {list follows}"
www.wwltv.com/local/stories/WWL082705nagin.b7724856.html

August 28th 11:31 A.M. CDT
Prairie Chapel Ranch Crawford, Texas
President Congratulates Iraqis on Draft Constitution, Discusses Hurricane Katrina,
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050828-1.html


Monday August 29th 7 AM and 10 AM
Katrina makes landfall twice www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Katrina


Monday August 29th
Bush declares a "major disaster" in Louisianna
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050829-2.html, Alabama www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050829-12.html and Mississippi. www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050829-4.html
This provides assistance to individuals and businesses.

Monday August 29th 10:06 A.M. MST
Pueblo El Mirage RV Resort and Country Club
El Mirage, Arizona
President Participates in Conversation on Medicare
Out of an approximately 16,900-word speech (not counting followup Q&A) on illegal immigration, gas prices, Iraq, terrorism, and mostly Medicare, Bush briefly (160 words) mentions Katrina. www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050829-5.html

Tuesday August 30 early AM
Levees break


Please don't think they give a shit.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 6:46 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by HKCavalier:
I'm feeling pretty optimistic, as far as it goes, that the admin. will not be getting a pass on this one.



I can't help but agree. We must trust the American people to see the truth in times of crisis.

Quote:


CNNUSATODAYGALLUP POLL: ONLY 13% BLAME BUSH?
Wed Sep 07 2005 10:42:26 ET

A CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll of 609 adults taken September 5-6 shows:

Blame Game -- 13% said George W. Bush is "most responsible for the problems in New Orleans after the hurricane"; 18% said "federal agencies"; 25% said "state and local officials"; 38% said "no one is to blame"; 6% had no opinion. -- 29% said that "top officials in the federal agencies responsible for handling emergencies should be fired"; 63% said they should not; 8% had no opinion.

MORE

Government Performance -- 10% said George W. Bush has done a "great" job in "responding to the hurricane and subsequent flooding"; 25% said "good"; 21% said "neither good nor bad"; 18% said "bad"; 24% said "terrible"; 2% had no opinion. -- 8% said federal government agencies responsible for handling emergencies have done a "great" job in "responding to the hurricane and subsequent flooding"; 27% said "good"; 20% said "neither good nor bad"; 20% said "bad"; 22% said "terrible"; 3% had no opinion. -- 7% said state and local officials in Louisiana have done a "great" job in "responding to the hurricane and subsequent flooding"; 30% said "good"; 23% said "neither good nor bad"; 20% said "bad"; 15% said "terrible"; 5% had no opinion.


13%? Guess that offcially labels most of ya'll the "lunatic fringe".

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 7:34 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hero- Feel like contributing to the timeline? Do you know something that we don't? As a lawyer, perhaps you can clarify who was supposed to be in charge of what. So feel free to add some facts to our collective understanding. Or feel free NOT to add to our collective understanding.

Also- from the SAME POLL

Forty-two percent of Americans say United States President George W Bush has handled Hurricane Katrina badly while 35% say he has performed well, according to Gallup poll published on Wednesday. Twenty-five percent of the 609 adults surveyed on September 5-6 blamed state or local officials for the problems, 18% blamed federal agencies and 13% blamed Bush directly. (In other words, 31% placed the blame at the Federal level) In the poll, 24% rated Bush's response to the catastrophe as "terrible," 18% as "bad," (for a total of 42% negative) 25% as "good" and 10% as "great" (total of 35% positive). Bush's ratings for his response reflected party affiliations, with 69% of republicans giving him positive ratings, 66% of democrats, negative ratings and independents leaning 47-29% to the negative side.

The poll also found that 93% of Americans believed Katrina was the worst natural disaster to strike the US in their lifetimes. Fifty-six percent in the poll, which had a margin of error of plus or minus four percentage points, believed New Orleans had been devastated beyond repair, but 63% believed the city should be rebuilt

wwww.news24.com/News24/World/Hurricane_Katrina/0,,2-10-1942_1766635,00
.html


Hero- I've learned to disbelieve everything you say, and with good reason. When the facts don't go your way, abandon them for opinion polls and then spin the results.


Please don't think they give a shit.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 7:45 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - The U.S. government agency leading the rescue efforts after Hurricane Katrina said on Tuesday it does not want the news media to take photographs of the dead as they are recovered from the flooded New Orleans area.
Yeah, I thought this would happen. I posted about this a couple of days ago. D*mn, it sucks being right all the time. But I just go on the assumption that "they don't give a shit" and it never steers me wrong. So...

Please don't think they give a shit.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 8:42 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Saturday August 27 4 PM
State activates contraflow traffic and suspends toll collection.
www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-4/112521300724932
0.xml


Saturday August 28 5 PM
Nagin calls for voluntary evacuation. "Nagin said late Saturday that he's having his legal staff look into whether he can order a mandatory evacuation of the city, a step he's been hesitant to do because of potential liability on the part of the city for closing hotels and other businesses." http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-4/11252130
07249320.xml




Saturday August 27/ Sunday August 28
Amtrak cancels rail service to and from New Orleans.
www.railserve.com/railnews/amtrak_news.html

Sunday August 28
All airlines cancel flights by mid-day

August 29 approx 5 hours after landfall
Michael Brown requests approx 1000 DHLS staff to be sent to NOLA in about 48 hours. "Brown (also) wrote Chertoff, Brown also urged local fire and rescue departments outside Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi not to send trucks or emergency workers into disaster areas without an explicit request for help from state or local governments."
http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/K/KATRINA_DISASTER_RESPONSE?S
ITE=LAORS&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2005-09-07-11-48-26


Please don't think they give a shit.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 9:17 AM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - The U.S. government agency leading the rescue efforts after Hurricane Katrina said on Tuesday it does not want the news media to take photographs of the dead as they are recovered from the flooded New Orleans area.



This is disgusting. Singy, thank you for your excellent work here, but your posts severely challenge my policy of refraining from constant scatology and expletive. (Edited to add: Signy, I was only trying to express my frustration with our government in a humorous way. I know exactly why you're posting this stuff. Don't go changin'!)

There are no troops to support, no terrorists to defy, no excuses whatever to forbid the press to report the news here. Our government is seriously subverting the Constitution of the United States for no higher purpose than to hide its incompetence from the public.

I am so tired of being outraged this week. What has happened to my country?

HKCavalier

Freedom of speech is so embarrassing, better nip that in the bud.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 9:29 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Sorry HK. I'm trying to persuade certain people who refuse to care but I think all I'm doing in hurting those who already do. Sorry, sorry, sorry.

Please don't think they give a shit.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 9:30 AM

HERO


Your timeline needs alot of work. Here:

< http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2005/09/04/katrina-response-time
line
>

He compiled his from the NO Times-Pic websight.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 9:54 AM

RUXTON


Perfesser,

Thanks for your insight. I guess it IS valuable to see, on open display, the total lack of the ability reason so many seem to have, and for reasoned men and women to be able to cut the "logic" of the former to rags.
-------------------------------------------

Also, ChrisIsAll said:

""What do you mean the city's not evacuated?? I don't give a who's in charge down there, declare martial law, send in the Guard and troops to back 'em up, get whatever vehicles you need, and get those people the out of that city, NOW" *slams phone down*

"I like my version of Bush better than his."
----------
AMEN! That's precisely what I've been trying to say since a week ago Monday. It was BUSH's job to get briefings about impending danger to the country and TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION. To my mind, he's the failure-in-chief most responsible for this disaster. He failed to take the appropriate Presidential action, and not only didn't understand his failure for many days after, i.e., playing golf, he STILL doesn't understand it.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 10:00 AM

RUXTON


Stuff is being offered but not accepted by the near-worthless U.S. government.

The President ought to have had a staff of experts coordinating this, right in the Oval Office, since at least Day 1:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/06/AR2005
090601994.html


Many needed people and services are standing by waiting for some stupid government asshole to give the go-ahead. The President ought to be working this, along with an appropriate staff, but NO, it's time for another photo op, and another round of golf.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 11:01 AM

R1Z


Quote:

There is another complicating factor- generally, the National Guard is under the governor's control except in times of war. During wartime, the President gains complete control over the national Guard. So "normally" the President lets governors request help from National Guard in other states although in emergnecies he has the authority to activate the National Guard on his own. Blanco, as far as I can tell, DID request National Guard from other states but that her requests sat on someone's desk in DC from the 26th until the 2nd.

But since we are at war (in Iraq) I think it was the President's duty to activate the National Guard in ALL states, as it was Blanco's duty to turn "hers" over to the Feds. Given everything, this seems more of a screwup at the Federal level. The sense that I'm getting is that the Federal government took on the authority for responding... to the point of sabotaging Jefferson Parish's emergency communication system, for example- but then did nothing for five days



Actually, I'm pretty sure that we AREN'T at war. As I understand it, only the U.S. Congress can declare war, and the last time it happened was WWII. Korea was a "police action", Viet Nam was lending help to indigenous folk resisting communism, and heaven only knows what to call Irag/Afghanistan/the police action on terror.

If, indeed, the governor has the authority to request National Guard troops from other states, there may be a federal authority to coordinate. Anyone know the procedure?

Sorry if this is a tangent, but the "War on Terror" thing has been sticking in my craw since it started. Only Congress can declare "WAR" and the last one to ask them to do it was Roosevelt.





To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites. Moderation is for monks. --Robt. Heinlein

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 11:44 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Just so everyone knows where the lies are coming from...

Quote:

The Post, citing an anonymous “senior Bush official”, reported on Sunday that, as of Saturday, Sept. 3, Blanco “still had not declared a state of emergency”… when, in fact, the declaration had been made on Friday, August 26 -- over 2 days BEFORE Katrina made landfall in Louisiana. This claim was so demonstrably false that the paper was forced to issue a correction just hours after the original story appeared....
Newsweek’s effort to assist the Bush damage control effort was even more egregious. While claiming that “Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Barbineaux Blanco seemed uncertain and sluggish, hesitant to declare martial law or a state of emergency, which would have opened the door to more Pentagon help” the magazine didn’t even bother to cite {the} “senior Bush official” {who provided thsi assessment}, choosing instead to report Blanco’s alleged failings as fact.






Please don't think they give a shit.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 2:02 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by R1Z:
Actually, I'm pretty sure that we AREN'T at war. As I understand it, only the U.S. Congress can declare war, and the last time it happened was WWII. Korea was a "police action", Viet Nam was lending help to indigenous folk resisting communism, and heaven only knows what to call Irag/Afghanistan/the police action on terror.


Please say thats just a joke. I mean, please say that calling a war a "police action" doesn't make it anything other than a war in anyones eyes.

Q: What do you have when you are holding two little green balls in your hand.
A: Kermit's undivided attention.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 2:05 PM

R1Z


I'm not saying it's not a collosal unpleasantness, nor an even bigger tragedy.

However, until the U.S. Congress declares it so, we're not at war.

To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites. Moderation is for monks. --Robt. Heinlein

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 2:19 PM

CITIZEN


Oh I didn't think you were condoning it, I just, you know, can't believe that such a thing can occur...

Just seems a ridiculous level of burocracy that a country is able to send troops in, but its alright, we're not at war!
What, those bullets, oh no don't worry they're peace-time rounds, nothing to worry about!

Q: What do you have when you are holding two little green balls in your hand.
A: Kermit's undivided attention.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 2:30 PM

CHRISISALL


Welcome to American Bureaucracy.

Let's have the technocrats Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 3:48 PM

R1Z


Thus, in the Korean Police Action it sounds like we arrested people, and in the Vietnam Conflict people just disagreed.

To quote General Sherman, who marched to the sea in the War of the Rebellion, "It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell."

(You may, of course, have heard that last little bit quoted before.)

My favorite reference to the phenomenon is in Mark Twain's War Prayer, perhaps his least known work. “I come from the Throne—bearing a message from Almighty God.” The words smote the house with a shock; if the stranger perceived it he gave no attention. “He has heard the prayer of His servant your shepherd, and will grant it if such be your desire after I, His messenger, shall have explained to you its import—that is to say, its full import. For it is like unto many of the prayers of men, in that it asks for more than he who utters it is aware of— except he pause and think. God’s servant and yours has prayed his prayer. Has he paused and taken thought? Is it one prayer? No, it is two—one uttered, the other not.
Both have reached the ear of Him who heareth all supplications, the spoken and the unspoken. Ponder this—keep it in mind. If you would beseech a blessing upon yourself, beware! Lest without intent you invoke a curse upon a neighbor at the same time. If you pray for the blessing of rain upon your crop which needs it, by that act you
are possibly praying for a curse upon some neighbor’s crop which may not need rain and can be injured by it.
“You have heard your servant’s prayer—the uttered part of it. I am commissioned of God to put into words the other part of it—that part which the pastor—and also in your hearts—fervently prayed silently. And ignorantly and unthinkingly? God grant that it was so! You have heard those words ‘Grant us the victory, O Lord our God.’
That is sufficient. The whole of the uttered prayer is compact into those pregnant words. Elaborations were not necessary. When you have prayed for victory, you have prayed for many unmentioned results which follow victory —must follow it, cannot help but follow it. Upon the
listening spirit of God the Father fell also the unspoken part of the prayer. He commandeth me to put it into words. Listen!
“O Lord our Father, our young patriots, idols of our hearts, go forth to battle—be Thou near them! With them, in spirit, we also go forth from the sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the foe. O Lord our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help
us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of the patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of their guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of
fire; help us to wring the hearts of their offending widows
with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out
roofless with their little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring
Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it—
“For our sakes who adore thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet!
“We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him who is the Source of Love, and Who is the Ever-Faithful Refuge and Friends of all who are sore beset and seeking His aid with humble and contrite hearts. Amen.”
(The old man paused). “Ye have prayed it; if you still desire it, speak! The messenger of the Most High awaits.”
* * * * *
It was believed afterward that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said.

To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites. Moderation is for monks. --Robt. Heinlein

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 7, 2005 4:46 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Stuff is being offered but not accepted by the near-worthless U.S. government.
The near-worthless US government was not only refusing foreign aid, but actively prohibiting Americans from helping themselves and each other.

Quote:

* The hospital ship, USS Bataan "equipped with six operating rooms, hundreds of hospital beds and the ability to produce 100,000 gallons of fresh water a day" was sitting in the Gulf of Mexico, unoccupied by a single person, by specific order of FEMA director Brown.

* Wal-Mart sent "three trailer trucks of water" to the stricken area but these were deliberately turned away by FEMA officials.

* FEMA workers prevented the U.S. Coast Guard, the only federal agency that effectively saved lives, from delivering 1,000 gallons of badly-needed diesel fuel to hospitals needing it to fuel their emergency generators,

* FEMA workers deliberately cut the emergency communications network in New Orleans, causing local police officials to reinstall it and post armed guards to prevent angry FEMA employees from further attempts to disconnect it.

* FEMA workers deliberately blocked badly-needed aid from other states, including offers from Chicago’s Mayor Daley, and the Governor of New Mexico, Richardson.


http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=2&contentid=2730
&page=2
(In case anyone has trouble with this source, these examples were reported by more reputable sources below. I only link to this site because of the convenient summary.)

See also this blog by a N.O. resident:
http://www.getyouracton.com/blog/
Quote:

So many stories of relief efforts being turned away. Wildlife and Fisheries who had a couple hundred boats going into the lower 9th ward for the first two days, rescuing the people trapped in attics and on roofs - until they were ordered to stop....


Aid thwarted by FEMA
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/05/national/nationalspecial/05blame.htm
l


Aid refused
http://www.suntimes.com/output/hurricane/cst-nws-daley03.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/05/opinion/05krugman.html?oref=login

It's one thing to be incompetent and space out during a crisis. It's another thing to prevent anyone else from helping. FEMA officials responsible need to be criminally charged with mass manslaughter.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 6:56 AM

FIREFLOOZYSUZIE


Hello, folks. Been away from the FFF for awhile, but have been reading along in this thread and wanted to share my appreciation for all of you who have supplied links, timelines, etc. to help me understand all that's happened since Katrina first threatened the Gulf Coast.

I want to add my little two cents, in response to certain parties who say that "now" is not the time to analyze our response to Katrina, and that "now" is not the appropriate moment to figure out what went wrong and who's to blame.

Excuse me but NOW is exactly a bit late.
In fact, yesterday would have been better.

We're still only midway through hurricane season.
Maybe our President's brother in Florida should give his sibling a phone call and remind W. of that fact!

During last week's sluggish response to Katrina, three other hurricanse coulda come right in behind her to finish off the entire Gulf region, and take Florida along with it.

We don't have the luxury of time. Every moment wasted in photo ops and in spinning attention away from Horsie Brown leaves us more vulnerable to the next storm. Will it take landfall of Hurricane Ophelia to get the Feds to take corrective measures?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 8:10 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by firefloozysuzie:

During last week's sluggish response to Katrina, three other hurricanse coulda come right in behind her to finish off the entire Gulf region, and take Florida along with it.

We don't have the luxury of time. Every moment wasted in photo ops and in spinning attention away from Horsie Brown leaves us more vulnerable to the next storm. Will it take landfall of Hurricane Ophelia to get the Feds to take corrective measures?


Wow, damn hurricanes are a menace. Somebody should do something...

First of all most hurricanes are well within the capability of State and Local governments to handle. Even the big one that hit Florida last year was ably managed by JEB Bush with the support of (but not controlled by) FEMA.

This was more then a hurricane. This is best evidenced by the response in Mississippi and Alabama where State, Local, and Federal recovery is proceeding mostly on schedule and as expected given the nature of the storm. This hurricane caused severe damage to New Orleans, but by Monday afternoon everybody was happy to have dodged the bullet. Had it ended there the State, Local, and FEMA approach would have been more then sufficient and they'd be blaming Bush for something else. Instead the levees broke and on top of the hurricane we had the worst flood in American history resulting in the near complete destruction of a major American City in just a few hours time.

So I wouldn't worry about Ophelia, she'll do what she wants and North and South Carolina or maybe Florida or whoever will deal with it as they always have and despite their support for the Katrina recovery. And if they need us, Ohio will be there.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 8:35 AM

GINOBIFFARONI


Just read Hero's response to your worries...

If what he says is so... why do your tax dollars go into these Federal departments FEMA et all

If local and state governments are suppose to manage the problems, why have the Federal side at all... ???

That money would likely be better spent at the local and state level then...




When my eloquence escapes you
My logic ties you up and rapes you

http://www.oldielyrics.com/lyrics/the_police/de_do_do_do_de_da_da_da.h
tml

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 9:08 AM

FIREFLOOZYSUZIE


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
Quote:





Wow, damn hurricanes are a menace. Somebody should do something...

First of all most hurricanes are well within the capability of State and Local governments to handle. Even the big one that hit Florida last year was ably managed by JEB Bush with the support of (but not controlled by) FEMA.

This was more then a hurricane. This is best evidenced by the response in Mississippi and Alabama where State, Local, and Federal recovery is proceeding mostly on schedule and as expected given the nature of the storm. This hurricane caused severe damage to New Orleans, but by Monday afternoon everybody was happy to have dodged the bullet. Had it ended there the State, Local, and FEMA approach would have been more then sufficient and they'd be blaming Bush for something else. Instead the levees broke and on top of the hurricane we had the worst flood in American history resulting in the near complete destruction of a major American City in just a few hours time.

So I wouldn't worry about Ophelia, she'll do what she wants and North and South Carolina or maybe Florida or whoever will deal with it as they always have and despite their support for the Katrina recovery. And if they need us, Ohio will be there.



Yes, oh Ironical One, hurricanes ARE a menace.
And you need to recheck your facts about how well Florida did last year as the population faced a string of them. Not just "The Big One" you mention. My best friend lives on the Space Coast in Florida. Why don't you ask her about how "state and local" folk were able to handle mass destruction, supposedly with only mere "support" from FEMA? I hear she's got her house pretty much repaired, almost a year later. I think it was Ivan that did the most damage, though she had some damage already from an earlier hurricane, and had a near miss only a couple weeks before that.

Last conversation I had with my friend about hurricanes she said she would never forget the misery of camping out in a half-destroyed home, freezing at night, with only partial electricity from a generator. She lived that way for a month after Ivan hit. Next hurricane warning? She's coming here to New Jersey.


At this point I'm sure she's thanking the Powers That Be that her home was decimated in a) the President's brother's state and b) during an election year.

FYI:

Weather forecasters have been predicting that this year's hurricane season will be worse than 2004.

The hurricane force from Katrina that actually struck New Orleans would be considered only Category 3 on the Saffir-Simpson scale (whereas the eyewall part that hit Mississippi had winds that qualified as Cateogory 4). Katrina had weakened before hitting land. Good thing, huh?

Like I said before, I've been away from FFF awhile, so you'll have to tell me: Are you always this casual about the suffering of other people?
And do you ever check your facts?




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 9:18 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by firefloozysuzie:

Like I said before, I've been away from FFF awhile, so you'll have to tell me: Are you always this casual about the suffering of other people?


Pretty much. I likes me a good hangin I do.
Quote:


And do you ever check your facts?


Facts. Don't need no stinking facts. Just convicted a guy today and not a fact in sight. Only real fact is that he doesn't deserve jail, but he's going anyway. Best part is all I had to do was nudge here and there and let his knucklehead family do the rest.

These days most people wouldn't know a fact if it bit them in the ass. And if it did, first thing is they'd call somebody like me to sue somebody like you (or President Bush) for causing it to happen.

By the way, I like your callsign. Clever and all rhymish.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 9:41 AM

CITIZEN


You know Hero, I had some respect for you once. I didn't agree with your views but you certainly seemed to believe in them.
Now however I have no problem believing your an American laywer, I can just see you happilly defending a child molester while gleefully helping to convict an innocent man, if you made a bit of money from it of course.

You really are acting Trollish, have some more respect for yourself.

Zen Buddhist to the Hotdog Vendor:
"Make me one with everything."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 9:45 AM

CITIZEN


I have new found respect for the British media:


Zen Buddhist to the Hotdog Vendor:
"Make me one with everything."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 10:22 AM

FIREFLOOZYSUZIE


LOL. If only we could get Americans to switch off FOXNews and start watching the BBC, imagine how better informed the US population would be!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 10:30 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
I can just see you happilly defending a child molester while gleefully helping to convict an innocent man, if you made a bit of money from it of course.


One, I'd never defend a child molester, not enough money in the world. Have helped prosecute one once, stupid judge threw case out on technicality, "sure he did it, but..."

Two, the man I convicted today was guilty, guilty of the crimes he was charged with in every possible way, cut and dried, no mistake about it, sky is blue, sun is hot, sure as sure can be. That said, he did not deserve jail. First offense, not a violent crime, etc. It was, however, a Misdemeanor of the 1st Degree and punishable with up to 6 months in jail. If he had pled guilty at pretrial, he'd have gotten a $150 fine and a suspended sentence. He chose trial and I'd still have asked for suspended time (with a bigger fine for the trouble), except he showed nothing but contempt for me, my officers, the law, and (really, really stupid) the Judge. End result, I asked for and got five days in the local jail. Harsh, but entirely his own doing (or rather that of his unreasonable and overbearing father who drove it all from behind the scenes). Lesson, courtesy never hurts.

Yes, I did make a bit of money from it (what being a professional and not a communist or some such), but I work for the government, so that bit of money is, well, just an itty bit. That said, I enjoyed the whole thing very much and consider the city much better off with said man in said jail. So, hahahaha (mine is an evil laugh). And don't ya go speedin in my City or it'll be you next!

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 10:31 AM

CITIZEN


BBC's even better than Skynews...
I saw on the BBC last night a report, and the reporter came out and said:
"Funny how this rich neighbourhood has troops patrolling and protecting property, while the poor neighbourhood down the road has nothing."

Zen Buddhist to the Hotdog Vendor:
"Make me one with everything."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 8, 2005 10:35 AM

CITIZEN


Hero:
I apologise for the earlier remark, it was over the line, and I withdraw it.
Your attitude wound me up, but you didn't deserve what I said.

Zen Buddhist to the Hotdog Vendor:
"Make me one with everything."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 9, 2005 3:44 AM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
By the way, I second what perfessergee said about hearing everyone on here. When someone tells you you (Finn) or anyone else should stay off the board, take it as high emotion. I am subject to it myself at times.
For instance, I may feel that AJ is being an idiot about things in the extreme, but he is hardly a troll.

But Bush still sucks Chrisisall

As I said before this is a very emotional concept. It’s a terrible tragedy and people are reacting to it out of a sense of anguish. But those of us not debased by ideological bigotry will go back to being friends afterwards, and I think that will be most of us. Hopefully all of us, but one must be realistic. However no one’s going to hold anything against you for a few over-critical comments made in the anguish of the aftermath of this a tragedy. Whether someone agrees with your particular take on things or not, we all know you to be a very level-headed guy.

My sparse posting on this board has little to do with these two people who made some of the personal attack against me in the other thread. Things have just been very busy at work. This is a busy time to be an army analyst, and I wasn’t posting very much before all this happened. And probably won’t be for some time. That evidently should make some people happy, but it’s by no means intended.

And I also encourage an open and free discussion on this board. People should feel free to speak their minds. They should be willing to accept criticism of their ideas, but no one should be told to leave. Bigoted ideals will not serve this board anything good.

-------------
Qui desiderat pacem praeparet bellum.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 9, 2005 5:39 PM

R1Z


Quote:

From the New York Times:
When Wal-Mart sent three trailer trucks loaded with water, FEMA officials turned them away, he said. Agency workers prevented the Coast Guard from delivering 1,000 gallons of diesel fuel, and on Saturday they cut the parish's emergency communications line, leading the sheriff to restore it and post armed guards to protect it from FEMA, Mr. Broussard said.



Reminds me of the last time I saw two dogs alternately peeing on the same fire hydrant.

One would hope (clearly in vain) that federal officials would be above turf wars. Reminds me of an episode where Max Headroom comments on security guards, "Why does he have get dressed up like a storm trooper to tell you you can't park your car here?" Or alternately, "Give a man a cap and a whistle and he thinks he rules the world."



To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites. Moderation is for monks. --Robt. Heinlein

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 9, 2005 7:30 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Saw the funniest thing today:

Quote:

Bush to tap Brown for Supreme Court, by Deanna Swift

In a surprise move, sources close to the White House say that President Bush will soon announce that he wants FEMA head Michael "Brownie" Brown to replace Justice Sandra Day O’Connor on the Supreme Court. Conservatives are cheering the decision, maintaining that Mr. Brown’s experience overseeing judges at horse shows will suit him well once he joins the highest court in the land.

WASHINGTON D.C - President Bush calls him “Brownie,” and if Mr. Bush gets his way, the nation will soon be referring to FEMA chief Michael Brown as “Justice.” Sources close to the White House say that Mr. Bush could announce his selection of Mr. Brown to replace retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor as early as next week.

A wealth of experience
In many ways, Mr. Brown seems a logical choice for a life-time appointment to the highest court in the land. He has a legal background and has distinguished himself in every position in which he has served. But it his experience overseeing judges that fans of the Oklahoma native say makes him an ideal candidate to don the black robe of the Gang of Nine.

Judging the judges
Between 1991 and 2001 Mr. Brown accrued the sort of legal experience that makes nominee John G. Roberts Jr. look like an amateur; he served as commissioner of the International Arabian Horse Association—the appellate court of the horse world. There he was charged with 'judging the judges,' enforcing the rules administered by judges at the horse association’s 300 annual horse shows.

A tough enforcer
While in his important role, Mr. Brown earned a reputation as a tough enforcer of rules—and intolerant of horse-related judicial activism of any kind. Fans of the former head horse judge say that when it came to interpreting the founding constitution of the International Arabian Horse Association, Mr. Brown was an 'originalist'—and unwilling to be swayed by whatever trend was sweeping the horse world at that moment.

Case in point: the bitter debate over horse appearance and identity. Influenced by a coarsened culture, a growing number of riders sought to use glitter on or in the mane, tail or hair of their horses. But Mr. Brown stood firm against this trend, noting that the founders of the IAHA had never intended for horses to be adorned in such a way.

"Michael knew that the founders had had a very clear vision," says one source close to the likely Supreme Court nominee. "Horses must wear a long, natural, unbraided mane--with or without clipped bridle path--,and a natural, unset, ungingered tail. That’s the traditionalist view in the horse world and Michael believed that his role was to enforce traditionalism."

Friends of the potential Justice say that he has long dreamed of a job in Washington DC, and is particularly enthused about a position that comes with a life-time appointment. "He's really looking forward to a place where he can just be himself and he doesn’t have to worry about getting fired, then going through that whole hassle about updating his resume and lining up references. Michael’s really had it with all of that," says a confidante of Mr. Brown.

Wanted: a quick confirmation
Legal analysts say that they anticipate a relatively quick and painless confirmation hearing for Mr. Brown, whose reputation for hard work and attention to detail has won over lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.

Do you agree with the Swift Report that Michael Brown is the best choice to replace Sandra Day O’Connor on the Supreme Court? Talk back to Deanna Swift.

http://swiftreport.blogs.com/news/2005/09/bush_to_tap_mic.html



Can't Take My Gorram Sky

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 10, 2005 3:58 AM

CHRISISALL


Finn, there's so much I don't like Bush for, I admit that he is my easiest, first target. Much of what you said about local culpability is making sense now, and there are so many at fault here, it's dizzying.
Still, there are agendas at work...

Ah, but that's the official story, eh? Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 10, 2005 4:56 PM

G1223


Ok at the federal level was not having Bataan use it's marines to supplement the local searches as soon as it was safe to get in.

They did not use a photo recon sat. for detailed pictures of the post storm area.

The feds did not push toe gov. to declare martial Law and have the military go in and use troops to maintain order and shoot looters if need be.

The state fouled up by not making the mayor evacuate the people by force if need be. They did not seem to coordinate with either the feds or the locals.

The Locals sat on their hands and did not move out the medical cases which would really need moved. They allowed people to drag their ass on getting out of the area.

I live in the midwest we get floods and tornados and I see the local authorities days before the feds get in the area. I think the locals and state authorites are the main people to blame but the feds are not blameless here.

TANSTAAFL

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 10, 2005 5:30 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


The Mayor is responsible for calling for evacuation, but has little other singular authority. He has NO CONTROL over buses, they are controlled by the Regional Transit Authority. And the provision of shelter areas called for in the plan had not yet been accomplished by the OEP. The OEP, which had the tactical authority to carry out actual evacuations, had been contracted out and was MIA during the actual event.

Evacuations, even mass evacuations, were primarily planned as an exodus in private (small) personal vehicles over existing highways. Blanco did everything possible to expedite the plans.

http://www.cityofno.com/portal.aspx?portal=46&tabid=26 (link to New Orleans disaster plan)


Authority to issue evacuations of elements of the population is vested in the Mayor. By Executive Order, the chief elected official, the Mayor of the City of New Orleans, has the authority to order the evacuation of residents threatened by an approaching hurricane. check

The SOP provides for the evacuation of the public from danger areas and the designations of shelters for evacuees. check

Conduct of an actual evacuation will be the responsibility of the Mayor of New Orleans check in coordination with the Director of the Office of Emergency Preparedness, and the OEP Shelter Coordinator. blank

Slow developing weather conditions (primarily hurricane) will create increased readiness culminating in an evacuation order 24 hours (12 daylight hours) prior to predicted landfall. check

D. Regional Transit Authority
* Supply transportation as needed in accordance with the current Standard Operating Procedures. blank

A. Shelter Demand
Shelter demand is currently under review by the Shelter Coordinator. Approximately 100,000 Citizens of New Orleans do not have means of personal transportation. blank


PS: That Katrina would make landfall somewhere in the area was predicted days in advance. Bush declared LA to be a federal disaster area BEFORE Katrina made landfall. That made the Feds the lead agency with two days to pre-deploy. But they didn't show up until 3 days after. That is inexcusable.

Please don't think they give a shit.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 10, 2005 9:21 PM

G1223


Well I remember people being upset at the hospital ships not already being there and I remember a freind who did his two years active duty on a destroyer in the pacfic and he told of his ship being the typhon's target as the storm hit them from three different direction each time it caught up to them.

He told of the injuries that ranged from equpiment breaking loose and striking a sailor or the sailor hitting the equipment when the shi did a hard lurch from a wave, and from supplies breaking in their storage containers and making a surface too slick for person to keep their footing.

Now imagine this on a hospital ship and remember that the ships will loose any radar dishes as well as commincations attenneas. Which would limit the use if not require the ship to leave the area or worse yet go down in the rough seas.

So outside of Bataan which was in position to get in right behind the storm the navy was pretty much stuck in port till they had a actual destination to send the ships.

Now about sending troops in to the cities ahead of time how are they going to move those folks who refused and still refuse to now leave the city?

I think the burden is much closer to the people at the local and state level.They were on the scene and knew better than the feds what should be done ( There is this plan you talk about which did not seem to be implament for the holdouts)

While the feds might not give a shit the locals who should were the ones doing more shitting and doing it on their own peoples.

TANSTAAFL

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 10, 2005 9:29 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


And that's exactly why the Coast Guard had a fleet of 20 ships plus 10 commercial ones waiting IN THE GULF to assist NO after the hurricane. Because they could and they're brave and capable, and you're a chicken sh*t that can't do anything but think up excuses why it's OK to be a chicken-sh*t like your chicken-hawk chicken-sh*t buds.

Got it, dude?


Please don't think the chicken-sh*ts give a sh*t.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, September 11, 2005 2:07 AM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
And that's exactly why the Coast Guard had a fleet of 20 ships plus 10 commercial ones waiting IN THE GULF to assist NO after the hurricane. Because they could and they're brave and capable, and you're a chicken sh*t that can't do anything but think up excuses why it's OK to be a chicken-sh*t like your chicken-hawk chicken-sh*t buds.

Got it, dude?


Please don't think the chicken-sh*ts give a sh*t.

Wow, this just screams paranoid delusion.

-------------
Qui desiderat pacem praeparet bellum.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, September 11, 2005 4:24 AM

G1223


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
and you're a chicken sh*t that can't do anything but think up excuses why it's OK to be a chicken-sh*t like your chicken-hawk chicken-sh*t buds.

Got it, dude?


Please don't think the chicken-sh*ts give a sh*t.



Well Rude I enjoyed hearing your loud whine about how the feds are suppose to be there care less than the locals who could not follow a plan they put toghere.

I guess the mayor is proof that stupid people do get into power. And here I thought Spin City was a comedy.

TANSTAAFL

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, September 11, 2005 5:32 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Interesting blog here, from some New Orleans residents.

http://vatul.net/blog/index.php

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, September 11, 2005 5:56 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

I enjoyed hearing your loud whine about how the feds are suppose to be there care less than the locals who could not follow a plan they put toghere. I guess the mayor is proof that stupid people do get into power.
Did you actually look at the plan? I did. Hero posted a link, and I checked it point-by-point and you know what? The Mayor followed the plan. The PLAN ITSELF... That FEMA drafted... was deficient in several key aspects. As far as stupid politicans are concerned... well, I think we have a MUCH clearer example in office right this very instant.

Please don't think they give a shit.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, September 11, 2005 7:02 AM

G1223


I do not think they give any more of a shit than the locals do. I keep hearing how Bush did not go back in time and set right like out of quantum leap.

FEMA's plan did not take into account that a Level 5 storm because those happen maybe twice in a decade and seperate parts of the world. I guess toget folks off their back that FEMA needs to plan for the return of Godzillia and the invasion of the pod people and the meteor storm of ten mile wide rocks falling on earth.

Bluntly I have said where mistakes were made but it seems a desire to point fingers at Bush because pointing at anyone else means that it is not totally his fault.

TANSTAAFL

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Sun, November 24, 2024 16:24 - 4799 posts
US debt breaks National Debt Clock
Sun, November 24, 2024 14:13 - 33 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sun, November 24, 2024 14:11 - 948 posts
The predictions thread
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:15 - 1189 posts
The mysteries of the human mind: cell phone videos and religiously-driven 'honor killings' in the same sentence. OR How the rationality of the science that surrounds people fails to penetrate irrational beliefs.
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:11 - 18 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:05 - 4762 posts
Sweden Europe and jihadi islamist Terror...StreetShitters, no longer just sending it all down the Squat Toilet
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:01 - 25 posts
MSNBC "Journalist" Gets put in his place
Sun, November 24, 2024 12:40 - 2 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Sun, November 24, 2024 10:59 - 422 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, November 24, 2024 09:50 - 7496 posts
The Islamic Way Of War
Sun, November 24, 2024 08:51 - 41 posts
Favourite Novels Of All Time?
Sun, November 24, 2024 08:40 - 44 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL