REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Hillary Clinton is doing something awesome

POSTED BY: FREDGIBLET
UPDATED: Friday, May 19, 2006 07:22
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1267
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:50 PM

FREDGIBLET


Hillary Clinton is introducing a bill into Congress which would make it so that every time Congress gets a pay raise the minimum wage goes up. Economically unfeasible? Yep. But still quite cool.

Link to the story below:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/5/10/145432/882

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:03 PM

KHYRON


Heh, I like that idea. I think the point behind it is that it is economically infeasible, thereby ensuring that congress doesn't get carried away when it comes to paying its own salaries.



Other people can occasionally be useful, especially as minions. I want lots of minions.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 10, 2006 11:05 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I can think of several reasons why raising the minimum wage would be sound economics, so why do you say it's unfeasible? You've really piqued my curiosity, and as much as I would enjoy a rigorous discussion on economics, I never really seem to get one. Would you perhaps humor me?

---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 11, 2006 12:02 AM

CITIZEN


Because if you raised the minimum wage as often as Congressmen raised their own pay you'd soon find businesses going bust because they can't stay competitive paying $25 an hour...

Congress wouldn’t go for it anyway. I believe while they’ve been denying a raise to the American minimum wage is required they’ve been giving themselves huge cost of living rises. Obviously inflation and cost of living rises don't hit people on minimum wage as hard as it does those on $145,000 a year...

They seem to be living on a different planet, or they just don’t give a shit...



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
And as you know, these are open forums, you're able to come and listen to what I have to say.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 11, 2006 12:03 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Wow, how generous of her. While overpayed politicians reap more and more of the peoples money, folks breaking into the work force can demand a few more pennies from their employers in the real world.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 11, 2006 12:10 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Wow, how generous of her. While overpayed politicians reap more and more of the peoples money, folks breaking into the work force can demand a few more pennies from their employers in the real world.


It's better than not giving them a rise at all, which is what is currently being done.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
And as you know, these are open forums, you're able to come and listen to what I have to say.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:06 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Actually, it wouldn't be that different from now. Since 1992, congressional pay has gone up a bit over 20% and the minimum wage has gone up 17.5%.

I note that in the bill, she plans to increase minimum wage to $7.25 from the current $5.15 in two years, regardless of congressional raises. That's a 29% increase. So she doesn't expect the congressional raises, which work out to about 2.5% a year when they don't decline them(about half the time over the last 10 yrs.), to be a major factor.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:32 AM

FREDGIBLET


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
I can think of several reasons why raising the minimum wage would be sound economics, so why do you say it's unfeasible? You've really piqued my curiosity, and as much as I would enjoy a rigorous discussion on economics, I never really seem to get one. Would you perhaps humor me?



I am not 100% sure but I believe that Congress raises its pay at a higher rate than inflation, pay going up faster than inflation means that businesses end up paying more than they can increase their prices without going over inflation themselves. That means lower profits which would lead to lower employment. That being said I do believe that the minimum wage should be tied to inflation so that there is an automatic cost-of-living increase, but I am not an economist so I don't know what the effects would be.

Quote:

Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.


OK I won't.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:24 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
I can think of several reasons why raising the minimum wage would be sound economics, so why do you say it's unfeasible? You've really piqued my curiosity, and as much as I would enjoy a rigorous discussion on economics, I never really seem to get one. Would you perhaps humor me?



I note for the record that the biggest impediment to wages is not Congress's refusal to artificially inflate the minimum wage, but is instead illegal immigration. Illegals undercut wages in a number of key sectors and in doing so undemine wages across the board. They also provide much needed labor which, by artificially inflating supply decreases demand and thus the amount employers are willing to pay also decreases.

Hillary is just using this issue to grandstand. I note she has no real solutions, just some symbolic fodder for the idiot left...but thats why they put the big "D" next to her name.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 11, 2006 7:17 AM

BROWNCOAT1

May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
Because if you raised the minimum wage as often as Congressmen raised their own pay you'd soon find businesses going bust because they can't stay competitive paying $25 an hour...

Congress wouldn’t go for it anyway. I believe while they’ve been denying a raise to the American minimum wage is required they’ve been giving themselves huge cost of living rises. Obviously inflation and cost of living rises don't hit people on minimum wage as hard as it does those on $145,000 a year...

They seem to be living on a different planet, or they just don’t give a shit...





I think the latter is more likely the case.

Besides, why should the rich and powerful care about us middle & lower class citizens? It's not like we have lobbyists on the Hill to seduce them with money, gifts, and all expenses paid trips or anything.

__________________________________________

"May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one."

Richmond, VA & surrounding area Firefly Fans:

http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/richmondbrowncoats/

http://www.richmondbrowncoats.org


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 11, 2006 11:25 AM

SASSALICIOUS


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Actually, it wouldn't be that different from now. Since 1992, congressional pay has gone up a bit over 20% and the minimum wage has gone up 17.5%.

I note that in the bill, she plans to increase minimum wage to $7.25 from the current $5.15 in two years, regardless of congressional raises. That's a 29% increase. So she doesn't expect the congressional raises, which work out to about 2.5% a year when they don't decline them(about half the time over the last 10 yrs.), to be a major factor.

"Keep the Shiny side up"



$7.25 still isn't a living wage in most cities in America.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 11, 2006 1:12 PM

FREDGIBLET


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
I note for the record that the biggest impediment to wages is not Congress's refusal to artificially inflate the minimum wage, but is instead illegal immigration. Illegals undercut wages in a number of key sectors and in doing so undemine wages across the board. They also provide much needed labor which, by artificially inflating supply decreases demand and thus the amount employers are willing to pay also decreases.



Actually the biggest impediment IMHO is the lack of interest by major corporations show in their employees, but immigration would probably be pretty close second.

Quote:

Hillary is just using this issue to grandstand. I note she has no real solutions, just some symbolic fodder...


Absolutely right, I just hope the Dem's don't nominate her. I consider myself a Democrat (with Libertarian leanings), but I won't vote for Hillary.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:00 PM

RIVER6213


If Hillary Clinton makes a bid for the Presidency, I will vote for her and then jump out of the way.

River

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 1:42 PM

LANCER


well, with higher minimum wage means higher taxes will fallow. anyways off of that, minimum wage should be abolished! it would definatly make the econ run better.

if Hillary runs for Presidency i will vote almost any decent person running against her. Hillary would mean higher taxes for all, and would pretty much distory any sligh chance for fairtax with her socialism idea's.

Well, here I am

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 19, 2006 7:22 AM

FUTUREMRSFILLION


Quote:

Originally posted by Lancer:
well, with higher minimum wage means higher taxes will fallow. anyways off of that, minimum wage should be abolished! it would definatly make the econ run better.

if Hillary runs for Presidency i will vote almost any decent person running against her. Hillary would mean higher taxes for all, and would pretty much distory any sligh chance for fairtax with her socialism idea's.

Well, here I am



I was going to say that even though I am a Democrat, I wouldn't be voting for Hilary.....but now I might have to.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sun, November 24, 2024 00:11 - 17 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, November 23, 2024 23:46 - 4761 posts
Australia - unbelievable...
Sat, November 23, 2024 19:59 - 22 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, November 23, 2024 19:33 - 4796 posts
MAGA movement
Sat, November 23, 2024 19:28 - 12 posts
More Cope: David Brooks and PBS are delusional...
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:32 - 1 posts
List of States/Governments/Politicians Moving to Ban Vaccine Passports
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:27 - 168 posts
Once again... a request for legitimate concerns...
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:22 - 17 posts
What's wrong with conspiracy theories
Sat, November 23, 2024 15:07 - 19 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, November 23, 2024 14:38 - 945 posts
Convicted kosher billionaire makes pedophile Roman Polanski blush
Sat, November 23, 2024 13:46 - 34 posts
The worst Judges, Merchants of Law, Rogue Prosecutors, Bad Cops, Criminal Supporting Lawyers, Corrupted District Attorney in USA? and other Banana republic
Sat, November 23, 2024 13:39 - 50 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL