REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Realistically and objectivly: What has the Bush administration done right?

POSTED BY: CHRISISALL
UPDATED: Monday, June 12, 2006 07:21
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 7130
PAGE 2 of 3

Wednesday, June 7, 2006 1:20 PM

RIGHTEOUS9



Even the Republicans weren't going to vote for Bolton, which is why Bush used a recess appointment to get him in.

So his best achievement in your mind was to circumvent checks and balances? He has done a lot for the hopes of American Dictators, I do give you that.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 7, 2006 1:48 PM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Come now SoupCatcher! Valid criticism is fine, but it's a PROVEN FACT that no one could have truly understood Katrina's effect on the levees, no matter how many may have correctly predicted it!


Okay, okay. I'll get with the program .

Bush brought cronyism back to FEMA!

HIP. HIP. HOORAY!!!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 7, 2006 2:12 PM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by Righteous9:

So....


you're saying the Administration's response to Katrina is that it has learned some lessons, and written a report on those lessons?



In order to fix something is it not prudent to first find out what is wrong?

Quote:


Or do you have a link of actual improvements that have and are being made?



http://www.fema.gov/about/bios/rpaulison.shtm

De-lurking to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 7, 2006 2:14 PM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by wildbill:
At the risk of causing a distraction during a liberal circle-jerk:



LMAO!

De-lurking to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 7, 2006 4:35 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by wildbill:
At the risk of causing a distraction during a liberal circle-jerk:


If I had started this as a 'What has the Clinton administration done right' thread (And BOY could I have...), would it be a liberal circle-jerk then?

I mean, who do I have to to get this 'liberal' tag off my back?

I believe in the right to bear arms!
I believe in the death penalty for rapists and child molesters!
I believe in smaller government!
And I believe George Bush is a corporate toadie that cares nothing for the yacht-ownership-challenged!

Chrisisall, meaning 'toadie' in the nicest possible way, of course...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 7, 2006 4:47 PM

SPACECOWGIRL


Hmmm....well, I have to admit I did enjoy receiving those "rebate checks"!





"Is everyone here very stoned?"
~Spike

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 7, 2006 4:47 PM

SPACECOWGIRL


Hmmm....well, I have to admit I did enjoy receiving those "rebate checks"!





"Is everyone here very stoned?"
~Spike

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 7, 2006 6:37 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Me. I'm stoned.

Very
V E R Y
V...E...R...R...Y...
what?

---------------------------------
Wow that broccoli looks GOOD! 'specially with Kethcup!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 7, 2006 10:59 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
[BIf I had started this as a 'What has the Clinton administration done right' thread (And BOY could I have...), would it be a liberal circle-jerk then?

I mean, who do I have to to get this 'liberal' tag off my back?

I believe in the right to bear arms!
I believe in the death penalty for rapists and child molesters!
I believe in smaller government!
And I believe George Bush is a corporate toadie that cares nothing for the yacht-ownership-challenged!

Chrisisall, meaning 'toadie' in the nicest possible way, of course...

Some people just prefer good ol' fashioned conservative circle jerks where they lament about the good old day's when blacks were slaves and women didn't have the vote.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 1:50 AM

PRAIRIEDOGG


You people are, for the most part, self righteous, deluded, stoned, morons. Bush was supposed to stop Katrina? MY ASS! The idiots were supposed to get out of the way of a freakin hurricane!! It's a hurricane people...move your sorry butts..oh no I see your just gonna sit there and then bitch when your tax-payer funded housing is knee deep in pooh. Liberals have created this welfare state that has done IMnot soHO irrevocable damage to the black community. Trust me I see it every day. I know a 19 year old boy with 4 kids by 3 different girls and one bouncing bundle of joy on the way. But ya can't tell him he's an irresponsible dolt because that's insensitive and judgemental and to a liberal being judgemental is the ultimate sin.
Somebody said this is the most reactionary administration. Yeah like that great liberal Roosevelt who sat on his hands while Hitler swallowed Poland, Austria...all the while Churchill (who, by the way, had been warning his country about the Nazis for 20 years) was asking for help, until the Japanese sank our Pacific fleet. Yeah that's not reactionary. Roosevelt didn't have the balls to take action without public support. I don't even no where to start with you goobers. Put down the bong and read a history book. There are jobs in this country for anybody that wants one but we have too many lazy bumbs that want to sit on the side line and preach inaction and big hugs for uneducated thugs who have demonstrated pretty effectively that they want to cut the heads off Jews, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, Quakers and few bunny rabbits just for good measure. I vote for killing them. Not because it will make them love us (they're not going to) but because it will make our enemies fear us. If you are a violent hatemonger, fear the United States. If you are peaceful you have nothing to fear from the United States, Canada or the UK. An English Lord addressed the House of Commons once and said (and I paraphrase) "We have no eternal allies. We have no perpetual enemies. But the interests of Great Britain are both perpetual and eternal." Americans have great allies. But we must place our interests above all else and take action to secure those interests. Ifear this rant will be lost like pearls before swine. But there you are.

"You're such a boob." - River

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 1:54 AM

WILDBILL


Racist.
Sexist.
"Homophobe" anyone?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 4:46 AM

CITIZEN


Ahh, indignant rants from the extreme right wing, glad to see they're as easy to provoke as ever

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 4:54 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by PrairieDogg:
Somebody said this is the most reactionary administration. Yeah like that great liberal Roosevelt who sat on his hands while Hitler swallowed Poland, Austria...all the while Churchill (who, by the way, had been warning his country about the Nazis for 20 years) was asking for help, until the Japanese sank our Pacific fleet.

A right winger advocating that the will of the people should be ignored in a democracy? A democracy where most of the people wanted to join in on the side of the Nazis or stay the hell out? Who'd a thunk it?

Bring back General Pinochet eh, he knew how to deal with dem dar gawdamn liberal scum!
Quote:

Put down the bong and read a history book.
Yes you really should, your deductive skills are simply wasted here with us heathens!



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 8:33 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by PrairieDogg:
You people are, for the most part, self righteous, deluded, stoned, morons.
Americans have great allies. But we must place our interests above all else and take action to secure those interests.

Hey! TheRightStuff is back! With more words and a different handle, but the same agenda!

So, you know a 19 year old with too many kids? Join the club, pal. That's a social condition that arises from lack of education, not something you can blame 'Liberals' for. You're being a jerk.
Oh! Sorry...being a good 'Liberal', I guess I shouldn't be judgemental. Forget I said that. Really. Be as ignorant as you feel necessary here, I won't mind.

Let's just kill bad guys, they wear black hats so we can spot 'em and air 'em out. It's easy.

You know, you could be President someday, if you kiss the right asses.

*CoughAllianceScum*

Non-judgemental Liberal wuss Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 9:51 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by amIaLion:
Nowadays, I would rather have a cowboy in office who tried to do the right thing even if their plan did not go smoothly. Sound familiar?





If you perceive Bush as a cowboy, then my fellow Browncoat is truly lost.

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 10:03 AM

CITIZEN


I was talking about America, not Germany, something plainly obvious if you read the words in my post.

Maybe you should read the those history books, I suggest a course in reading comprehension first though .



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 10:40 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by amIaLion:
Ok, but only if you take a course on basic grammar you gorram elitist. "Maybe you should read the those history books.." It does not surprise me one bit that you are sporting Simon's icon when you should be sporting Jayne's.

The concept of a typo pass you by did it sweet pea?

I see you can pick up on minor flaws in written language but still can't quite seem to grasp the sentiment, but then MS Word’s grammar checking ability can't tell you what a sentence means now can it .

You attacked me, I went for you in exactly the same way, what’s the matter, you can dish it out but you can't take it back? Ahhh bless and now you've gone and spat the dummy all over this 'unclean' thread. It'll need cleaning and disinfecting.
Quote:

Also if you were talking about America, where "most of the people wanted to join in on the side of the Nazis or stay the hell out" which America are you talking about?!?
The one that prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour had both a huge isolationist and a huge pro-Nazi movement, but not so much with the "let's help our struggling allies" movement. Therefore if the government had gone to war before the change of public opinion that would have been undemocratic (remembering that America still didn't declare war on Germany, Germany declared war on America ).

Why which America are you talking about?



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 10:55 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by amIaLion:
I respect the fact that you want to try to have an open discussion about the Bush administration, but if you are going to praise those that agree with your politics and shoot down anybody that doesn't agree than why have a discussion at all?


I started this thread as a serious analysis of what good the Bush administration has done, and after two hours, my first poster was making sport of Bush. I then decided to just goof and have fun with it, because, in all seriousness, no case CAN be made for any real good to come specifically out of the present administration other than "I got a check" or "Things would have been worse under Kerry" or "We got Saddam" or "The economy is better"; it's all crap. Tired, fear-based garbage.
We are fighting a war doomed to limited success at best. We still let the CIA do black bag ops like the nonsense going on in Africa right NOW. Civil rights are a joke in as far as the administration can do as they please and call it what they like.
The children of this nation and others will pay the real price, and mindless security-addicts like yourself need to either not see it, or condone it as National Interest, and I cannot hold with that.

WATCH SERENITY AGAIN AND PAY ATTENTION!!!!!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 11:06 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


And in the spirit of this thread (I hope!) I just HAD to post this!

Flag Burning and Other Dubious Epidemics
Austin, Texas - Thank goodness the Republicans are around to tell me what to worry about. The flag-burning crisis - here in Austin, there's that pall of smoke rising from the west every morning (it's from an area called Tarrytown, where they burn hundreds of flags daily).

You didn't know hundreds of flags were being burned daily? Actually, you can count on your hand the number of incidents reported over the last five years. For instance, there was one flag burned in 2005 by a drunken teenager and one by a protester in California in 2002. This appalling record of ravishment must be stopped. You're clearly not worried about what matters.

Gay marriage, now there's a crisis. Well, OK, so there isn't much gay marriage going on here in Texas. None, in fact. First, we made it illegal. Then, we made it unconstitutional. But President Bush is all concerned about it, so I guess we have to alter the U.S. Constitution.

Gus and Captain Call (of "Lonesome Dove" fame) will be an item - with who knows who waiting in line right after them.

Also of great concern to Republicans is God Almighty, who, rather to my surprise, has been elected chairman of the Texas Republican Party. That's what they announced at the biannual convention in Fort Worth this week: "He is the chairman of the party." Sheesh, the Democrats couldn't even get Superman.

Also weighing down the nation with a heavy burden is the estate tax, which the Senate will try to repeal this week. The estate tax applies to around 1% of Americans, and I have yet to find any record of it costing anyone a family farm or business. It affects only very, very, very rich people, of whom you are probably not one. And they don't, actually, need another tax break.

These are the things we are supposed to be worrying about, and you notice that it frees us of quite a few troubles we might otherwise fret about.

The war in Iraq? No sweat.

War with Iran? We're carefree.

The economy? Hey, did you see that employment report? Well, ignore it.

Budget out of control, shipwreck ahead? Never mind - Bush doesn't. Worst class divisions since the Gilded Age, rich so much more enormously richer than everybody else, country starting to get creepy? Don't worry, be happy. Torture, massacre, extraordinary rendition, hidden gulag of prisons in foreign countries, Guantanamo and massive violations of international law, American law and the Constitution? Well, you can see why gay marriage is a far greater menace.

Wipe out for the environment; hundreds of regulations and laws changed to favor those who exploit and damage natural resources; all so common no one is keeping track of them all? Let her rip.

Global warming? In the first place, it's Al Gore's issue. In the second place, it's a downer. In the third place, who cares if it's too late in a few years?

Homeland security/war on terror? With the highly excellent disposition of anti-terror funds once more judiciously applied by the Department of Homeland Security, we truly have nothing to worry about. We're ready to stop terrorist attacks in Wyoming, and there are no important cultural sites in New York City, so let's rock.

Oil crisis? Ha! What oil crisis? You want a $100 rebate you can then give the oil companies? Hey, we're going to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and that should see us through ... oh, about nine months.

Windfall profits? You think the oil companies are ripping us off for windfall profits? Who? Exxon Mobil? Why, they would never!

I believe what we have here is a difference over moral values.

The Republicans are worried about the flag, gay marriage and the terrible burden of the estate tax on the rich. The rest of us are obviously unnecessarily worried about war, peace, the economy, the environment and civilization. Another reason to vote Republican - they have a shorter list.



---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 11:18 AM

CHRISISALL


Thanks for bringing it back to the lighter side, Signy, I lost sight of the funny for a moment. Which reminds me...
Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:

Also of great concern to Republicans is God Almighty, who, rather to my surprise, has been elected chairman of the Texas Republican Party. That's what they announced at the biannual convention in Fort Worth this week: "He is the chairman of the party." Sheesh, the Democrats couldn't even get Superman.


Superman can turn back time, our dear and fluffy Lord can't. I'd go with Supes, baby. I'll have my peeps call his peeps.

Chrisisall, a peeps person

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 11:46 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by amIaLion:

Trust me, there are plenty of things about the Bush administration that I don't like, but I have tried to point out what good, if anything, has come out of the last four years. I don't remember when this country's interest in politics, particularly the younger generation has been so high.

Fair enough. I tend to shoot from the hip.

Mindless conspiracy-addict Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 12:33 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by amIaLion:
You need to read more history books. Please don't spew that revisionist history crap and actually do some research if you want to discuss history.

Right back at ya you revisionist elitist monkey .

America first was the foremost pressure group against the war and was far from small time.

"The Japanese have a right to Hawaii. I would rather be in this war on the side of Germany than on the side of the British." Ellis Jones, speaking at a National Copperheads meeting, a group with strong ties to the America First Committee.
We must get ready for the next attack which must be made upon this communistic administration. Horace Haase of America First.

But actually I was also thinking of the German American Bund (not heard of that? you can read about it in those history books we've been talking about) which was hardly a small time movement.

Or maybe you'd like to talk about the Order of 76?

Or perhaps you'd prefer to discuss the Silver Shirts?

The Christian Mobilizers maybe?

Or there's the 1930's Republican party that employed many Nazi's high up in the national and state Republican party organisations. The Republican party of the time also had many links to the Nazi party in Germany.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 1:25 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


You know ChrisIsAll,

That post about Jesus v Superman got me to thinking.

Jesus' miracles were homey - turning water into wine, multiplying loaves and fishes, healing and driving out demons, raising from the dead. In that culture, Roman rulers had been said to have had those powers for several centuries.

Time travel and turning back time weren't even concepts until the last couple of hundred years, as far as I know. You'd think that if Jesus really was all knowing, he'd have performed a more sophisticated, multi-cultural, multi-temporal suite of wonders. As it is, his works come across as provincial.


Waiting for the thunderbolt.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 2:59 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Aw c'mon. Jesus was a homey kind of guy. And besides, if he had done the time travel thing it wouldn't have been understood by the locals- not even Judas. You know, it's like how the religious literalists paper over Biblical inconsistencies- God only reveals you what you can understand at the time. Enlightenment is on a "need to know" basis!

---------------------------------
If I'm not here tomorrow you'll know the thunderbolt got me!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 3:10 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


I realize your response is tongue-in-cheek and so you're not looking for a serious reply.

But this is still bugging me. When you think about it, if he wanted to leave a message to the next few hundred generations, he could have done something not quite explicable to the natives at the time, but completely awesome to the future. As he was all-knowing, what to do would have been easy to figure out.

As it is, his miracles seem shabby, dusty, and provincial.


Once they've been to the city, you can't keep 'em down on the farm.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 4:09 PM

PDCHARLES

What happened? He see your face?


Well, I may have beach front property in my children's lifetime (possibly mine)... without having to move. Currently, 6 miles inland. A plus.

...and according to fictional mob boss Tony Soprano:
"FEMA’s down there handing out Krugerands in buckets

...

Dick Cheney for president… of the f%*#in’ universe"

Thats something right? ermm... Thats something left?

http://hammeroftruth.com/category/dick-cheney/

...all I got right now. please someone else chime in.


Oh... and Superman is sitting to the right of Jesus in The Last Supper. (Jeezy's right)



Wha?!?... *sniff sniff* OH.... IM ON FIRE!!!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 4:36 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


I'm just glad you posted and I hadn't killed yet another thread!


Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 4:46 PM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:

"The Japanese have a right to Hawaii. I would rather be in this war on the side of Germany than on the side of the British." Ellis Jones, speaking at a National Copperheads meeting, a group with strong ties to the America First Committee.
We must get ready for the next attack which must be made upon this communistic administration. Horace Haase of America First.

But actually I was also thinking of the German American Bund (not heard of that? you can read about it in those history books we've been talking about) which was hardly a small time movement.

Or maybe you'd like to talk about the Order of 76?

Or perhaps you'd prefer to discuss the Silver Shirts?

The Christian Mobilizers maybe?

Or there's the 1930's Republican party that employed many Nazi's high up in the national and state Republican party organisations. The Republican party of the time also had many links to the Nazi party in Germany.




Or we can talk about the Imperialistic English who "en-slaved" half the world as their "piggybank" or the more generally accepted term Commonwealth. That is of course after introducing syphillis et al but making up for it by saving all of the pagans from their own eternal damnation.

70 or 700 years ago, what is past is past man. But we should remember the past in order to better shape the future. Just doing my part in case any of you Brit's are starting to feel imperialistic again.

De-lurking to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 6:09 PM

KANEMAN


...Kept buildings (over 50 stories high) erect and without fire(Cool in my manual).
...Manned the ship as economy and financial markets rebounded(Presidents get blamed when these fault-er on their watch..they should also receive credit when they rebound)
...Speaking of credits: LOVED MINE
...Told UN.."We aim to misbehave!"..and followed through.
...I'm sure over the objections of his advisers, has taken upon himself the burden of changing the pronunciation of the word "terror".
...Aids funding for Africa.
...Hopefully a wall between us and Mexico...Even better a bridge straight to Canada.
...Laughs every time France complains about our governments actions around the world.
...understands the Liberal / Muslim extremist paradox. And still protects liberals from this without their knowledge.
...Once told a Norwegian diplomat.."SSH, you can talk when someone tells me where the hell Norwegia is".

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 8, 2006 6:16 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


OOOOOOH!!! I KNOW! I KNOW!! (waves hand wildly, sits up straight in seat) ME ME!!

I KNOW what Bush did that was good! He really believes in rehabilitation of criminals and deviants. He has a wide variety in his Administration! Ex-addicts, alcoholics, felons, and adulterers, and deeply closeted gays. Now how's THAT for inclusion???

---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 1:15 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
Or we can talk about the Imperialistic English who "en-slaved" half the world as their "piggybank" or the more generally accepted term Commonwealth. That is of course after introducing syphillis et al but making up for it by saving all of the pagans from their own eternal damnation.

70 or 700 years ago, what is past is past man. But we should remember the past in order to better shape the future. Just doing my part in case any of you Brit's are starting to feel imperialistic again.

De-lurking to stir stuff up.

The ad hominem attack against the English not withstanding (BTW as you say past in the past... how's the CURRENT American imperialistic kick going? Oh no wait you're spreading the light of democracy to the 'pagans' ) this has nothing to do with the topic of what I was talking about (which I recognise had nothing to do with original topic of this thread, but I didn't start off down that road...)

I replied to an accusation that FDR was too weak to fight the Nazis and that the great strong George Bush would have done a better job. I just merely replied to the anti-liberal hate-filled extremist right-wing rant with the fact that in order to go to war with Germany FDR would have had to act like a Dictator, a Nazi if you will, not the democratically elected leader of a democratic nation, will of the people and all that. Also given the right’s ‘obvious’ love of civil freedoms (ho ho ho, that one get’s me every time) it was rather ‘surprising’ to hear a right-winger desire a dictatorship over democracy. Though I suppose, trying to see it from their point of view, if you’re the dictator a dictatorship is just gravy, is not?

Then I had someone who seems to be confused as to their 'Leo-nicity' fall out their pram at me because in their fantasy world the American people wanted a war with Germany and the government was holding them back because the government was too weak, something that's is flagrantly, and lets be fair here, utter and complete crap.

I'm sorry if pointing out that during the 1930's the Republican party had a fairly obvious Nazi connection upsets you to the point you need to bring my ancestry in too question, but frankly it's a fact, as is Britain’s Imperialist past and frankly you bringing it up doesn't bother me one little bit .

Now for all the bad things you can say about Britain we've always stood up for our mates; which is how we got dragged into both World Wars. By comparison the States, erm hasn't. You got 'dragged' into the same conflicts by being attacked, because the prevailing opinion of the populace was that those wars were your allies 'problem' . Personally I think standing by your friends is a redeeming quality, maybe you have a different view?

Disclaimer:
Much of what I just said is a little tongue in cheek, also a bit of a rebuke to the ad hominem on my country of origin, thought I'd better point that out in case you decided to spit the dummy like amIaLion.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 1:38 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:
Told UN.."We aim to misbehave!"..and followed through.


Just so I know are we talking about:
George W. Bush
Saddam Hussein
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Or someone else? My money's on Saddam, since the whole telling the UN where to go thing was why Iraq was invaded in the first place, wasn't it? Or maybe it was the Oil, or maybe it was a distraction for something, who knows, do you know?
Quote:

I'm sure over the objections of his advisers, has taken upon himself the burden of changing the pronunciation of the word "terror".
To: Fund that one! Bomb that one!
Quote:

understands the Liberal / Muslim extremist paradox. And still protects liberals from this without their knowledge.
What paradox is that? Perhaps something along the lines of "Muslim extremists will still kill you no matter how nice you are to them"?

Great try except of course the current crop of Muslim extremism is largely a backlash to years of right-wing policies...

Also since when did being a Liberal mean one can not defend oneself?

A favourite accusation of the right "you don't want to go around killing everyone so you're a coward!!" Because the right-wing plan of attacking people weaker than themselves is real brave.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 3:53 AM

CHRISISALL


Rue: "Waiting for the thunderbolt."

*Chrisisall, crawling out of a smoking hole in the ground*

The first one, it seems, was on me.



Shocked Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 4:51 AM

CHRISISALL


I don't get it, Citizen.
You have this strange ability to make peeps view you as something you totally aren't. Are these powers mostly mental?

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 5:19 AM

SHADOWFLY


Citizen

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 6:02 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:
...Kept buildings (over 50 stories high) erect and without fire(Cool in my manual).

You're shitting me, right? 9/11 happened on dubya's watch.
Quote:

...Manned the ship as economy and financial markets rebounded(Presidents get blamed when these fault-er on their watch..they should also receive credit when they rebound)
See Auraptors late but not great thread claiming the economy is roaring.
Quote:

...Speaking of credits: LOVED MINE
...Told UN.."We aim to misbehave!"..and followed through.

And why is that a good thing? Just wondering if this isn't ideological crap.
Quote:

...I'm sure over the objections of his advisers, has taken upon himself the burden of changing the pronunciation of the word "terror".
Damning with faint praise.
Quote:

...Aids funding for Africa.
On the condition "abstinence only" is the only message. The result - AIDS is increasing in areas using Bush's tainted "help".
The rest of your post is too stupid to bother with.


Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 6:12 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by amIaLion:
Congratulations, you are the king of knowing about obscure anti-semitic groups that were small time, compared to the overwhelming majority of people who just did not like the Nazis. It makes me wonder whether you are a neo-nazi sympathizer yourself to know so much about these groups. German American Bund was made up of ethnic Germans, it's a wonder why they would be so ethnocentric during a time like the Great Depression.
The Order of 76, Silver Shirts and the German American Bund are all overrated as far as their influence goes unless you believe fervently like you do in such noble causes such as fascism and anti-semitism. Next you are probably going to tell me that the Holocaust never happened. Do yourself a favor and visit the Holocaust museum here in D.C. Although it probably make neo-nazis like yourself squeamish. Don't bother replying, I won't be reading any more of your propaganda. Have a nice day.

Congratulations! You are king of not being able to make a cogent argument and spouting bullshit .

A right winger accusing someone else of being evil because they can't come up with a cogent argument? Whatever next? Business as usual I guess.

A Nazi and a Liberal? Sounds a little far fetched, Nazi’s being right wing fascist extreme conservatives and all…

Mate all you had to do is say I'm right and you are wrong, you didn't need to attempt (fairly pathetically) to insult me. Nice to see you didn't answer any of my points, just called me a Nazi because my views are so demonstratably convergent from those of Nazis.

Go Vote Republican, the party that has historically shown itself to like Nazis, because it'll work with your pro-white supremacist mind set .
Don't bother replying, I won't be reading any more of your propaganda. Have a nice day.
Is a nice way of saying "I can't continue this discussion, I'm too stupid to converse with you on an equal level, back to the neo-Nazi websites for old amIadicklion."
Quote:

Originally posted by Chrisisall:
I don't get it, Citizen.
You have this strange ability to make peeps view you as something you totally aren't. Are these powers mostly mental?

It happens when you try to educate moronic right-wing C*nts...



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 6:15 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by ShadowFLY:
Citizen

Do you have a point?



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 8:33 AM

RIGHTEOUS9




Amialion,

your attempt at objectively showing some good things the president has done is appreciated,

but I'd watch the McCarthyite suggestion that knowing about something equates you to that thing. It's a bad way to frame things when you equate information with association -- you know, that whole chilling effect on learning history and looking at opposing ideas?

"We found out you subscribe to a socialist paper. When did you become a communist?"

not that your comment in itself carries such weight, but I wonder if this angle has occured to you.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 9:38 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by citizen:
The ad hominem attack against the English not withstanding (BTW as you say past in the past... how's the CURRENT American imperialistic kick going? Oh no wait you're spreading the light of democracy to the 'pagans' ) this has nothing to do with the topic of what I was talking about (which I recognise had nothing to do with original topic of this thread, but I didn't start off down that road...)



As I have mentioned in two different threads, I am Canadian, Please do not assume that because I
may or may not disagree with you I must be an "Ugly American".

Quote:


I just merely replied to the anti-liberal hate-filled extremist right-wing rant...



I believe the term you were looking for is differing viewpoint.

Quote:


I'm sorry if pointing out that during the 1930's the Republican party had a fairly obvious Nazi connection upsets you to the point you need to bring my ancestry in too question, but frankly it's a fact, as is Britain’s Imperialist past and frankly you bringing it up doesn't bother me one little bit .



I was not trying to bother you in the least. I was merely trying to illustrate a point. It's good to see you can still carry on a reasonable discussion with someone without getting too personal. Oh and please try not to use that be all and end all argument of "well he started it".

BTW, careful when refering to attacks on ancestry, there could be descendents of the American Bund lurking about who wish people would just forget about their families questionable past.

Quote:


Now for all the bad things you can say about Britain we've always stood up for our mates; which is how we got dragged into both World Wars. By comparison the States, erm hasn't. You got 'dragged' into the same conflicts by being attacked, because the prevailing opinion of the populace was that those wars were your allies 'problem' . Personally I think standing by your friends is a redeeming quality, maybe you have a different view?



I couldn't agree more. Must be the British blood that flows through my Canadian veins.

Quote:


Disclaimer:
Much of what I just said is a little tongue in cheek, also a bit of a rebuke to the ad hominem on my country of origin, thought I'd better point that out in case you decided to spit the dummy like amIaLion.



Thanks for the response. You managed to post without invoking the NAFTACAFTASHASTA or jew commie pirate... argument. And once again, people can disagree with you, it is their right. It is also their right not to be labled a "dummy" if that is the case.



De-lurking to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 12:44 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
As I have mentioned in two different threads, I am Canadian, Please do not assume that because I
may or may not disagree with you I must be an "Ugly American".

It was a joke, a fact I thought would be plainly obvious by the fact I actually told you it was.
Quote:

I believe the term you were looking for is differing viewpoint.
Erm no I mean anti-liberal hate-filled extremist right-wing rant, reference PrairieDogg's post if you want.
Quote:

I was not trying to bother you in the least. I was merely trying to illustrate a point. It's good to see you can still carry on a reasonable discussion with someone without getting too personal. Oh and please try not to use that be all and end all argument of "well he started it".
Do me a favour; I'm the one in the wrong because I responded to personal insults by saying the exact same thing back, but the person who said them's okay, why's that?

Frankly if someone starts in on me with insults I'll reply. I didn't insult you so why the sermon? Why aren't you giving certain other posters here a telling off? Do you condone their comments?
Quote:

Thanks for the response. You managed to post without invoking the NAFTACAFTASHASTA or jew commie pirate... argument. And once again, people can disagree with you, it is their right. It is also their right not to be labled a "dummy" if that is the case.
I disagreed with someone and was called a Nazi right here in this thread because I dared to disagree. Someone you seem to be defending here (I'm struggling to find another justification for the "It's good to see you can still carry on a reasonable discussion with someone without getting too personal." line beyond sarcasm in that direction).

I didn't label anyone anything, I said someone SPAT the dummy, not that they were a dummy, because they lost their temper when I disagreed with them.

What more do you want from me, I outright said I was joking in my post when I replied to you, do you actually want me to open a vein or do you prefer speaking from a position of outraged moral high ground?



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 12:44 PM

SASSALICIOUS


Regarding Katrina, National Geographic predicted the outcome a year before it actually happened. Therefore, it was known that it could occur.

I read an interview with this guy in the Navy. He said the big navy ship was in the Gulf, waiting to go in. All the President would have had to say was "Go". And he was incapable of doing that.

Though maybe, just maybe we could deal with the shit happening in our country if the NATIONAL GUARD wasn't in Iraq. National=U.S.=NOT Iraq.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am on The List. We are The Forsaken and we aim to burn!
"We don't fear the reaper"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 9, 2006 1:40 PM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by Sassalicious:
I read an interview with this guy in the Navy. He said the big navy ship was in the Gulf, waiting to go in. All the President would have had to say was "Go". And he was incapable of doing that.



Wow, that is upsetting. I wonder why Bush did not give the order? Maybe there were some jurisdictional conflicts or gross miscommunications. Do you possibly remember where you read the interview? Or even better, could you supply a link so my lazy ass won't have to look it up.

De-lurking to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russian losses in Ukraine
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:32 - 1163 posts
Trump, convicted of 34 felonies
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:10 - 45 posts
Salon: How to gather with grace after that election
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:04 - 1 posts
End of the world Peter Zeihan
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:59 - 215 posts
Another Putin Disaster
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:58 - 1540 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:46 - 650 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:41 - 4847 posts
Dubai goes bankrupt, kosher Rothschilds win the spoils
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:31 - 5 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:29 - 7515 posts
Jean-Luc Brunel, fashion mogul Peter Nygard linked to Epstein
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:27 - 14 posts
All things Space
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:17 - 270 posts
White Woman Gets Murdered, Race Baiters Most Affected
Thu, November 28, 2024 07:40 - 20 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL