REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Illegal Immigration- what to do?

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Friday, May 12, 2023 04:24
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 6944
PAGE 1 of 2

Thursday, July 13, 2006 4:12 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


After much consideration, I've come down on the side against illegal immigation. But like "the war on terror" doesn't (in my mind) meand a "war on terrorist", fighting illegal immigration does not necessarily mean fighting illegal immigrants.

What to do?

The floor is yours.

---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:44 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Whatever we do will have to involve dialog with Mexico. Most illegal immigrants come from there, and most from other countries pass through there on their way here.

Not much can be done along this line until the election controversy there gets settled.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:50 AM

SERGEANTX


How about we let them in legally? Then they wouldn't be illegal. Hmmm. That was simple. Next problem?

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:06 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by SergeantX:
How about we let them in legally? Then they wouldn't be illegal. Hmmm. That was simple. Next problem?

Haha. I second.

I entered the country once illegally. I left the country for my honeymoon and reentered with my student visa. Turns out marriage to an American automatically invalidates all non-immigrant visas (including my student visa). The only way I could have reentered the country legally was to wait 6 months abroad while they processed my green card. I wouldn't have been able to come back to school on time. So I lied and said my husband was Canadian, and they let me in with my student visa.

Eventually my illegal entry was discovered, and I paid a fine of $90. I was legally allowed to enter as a student and a wife of an American, but I couldn't go on a honeymoon and just come back in.

I'm all for getting rid of silly, convoluted laws that artificially create crime and "illegality."

Can't Take My Gorram Sky

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:17 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Sarge- There is still the minor issue that even "legal" immigrants aren't citizens and as such have no political representation. How is that different from living in a nation ruled by a generalissimo, where you are "legal" but have no political representation? Won't that just create the same hellhole situation here?

---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:36 AM

SERGEANTX


OK, so let them become citizens. An eager flow of immigrants has been the fuel source that's driven our country since it's inception. I fail to see the advantage in shutting that down.

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:38 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I'm cool with that. What process? What requirements? How long? Really curious- please xplain.

---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:52 AM

SERGEANTX


I dunno. You're implying those details are important for a reason, I presume?

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:03 AM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
I'm cool with that. What process? What requirements? How long? Really curious- please xplain.


We could go back to the old process (in effect until the 1920s IIRC).

Pass a physical.

Welcome to America.

(unless you were from China, then no way, no how).

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:14 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
We could go back to the old process (in effect until the 1920s IIRC).

Pass a physical.

Welcome to America.



Unfortunately we live in a much different time now. How can all the immigrants who want to come to America be properly screened for past indiscretions? The Country's infrastructure could not possibly support the additional mass of people which could be expected. New immigrants might have to live in camps and not get access to doctors or schools. This may have been a viable option 90 years ago, but not so much today.

De-lurking to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:19 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


I'm just interjecting that roughly 10% of the entire population of Mexico resides in the US. Does that seem weird to anyone else?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:27 AM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
Unfortunately we live in a much different time now. How can all the immigrants who want to come to America be properly screened for past indiscretions. The Country's infrastructure could not possibly support the additional mass of people which could be expected. New immigrants might have to live in camps and not get access to doctors or schools. This may have been a viable option 90 years ago, but not so much today.

De-lurking to stir stuff up.



I don't really buy any of this. I know it's the 'conventional wisdom', but it seems like a convenient rationalization for more selfish motives.

We've all got our 'indiscretions'. Or our immigrant ancestors certainly did.

Living in camps? Well, I guess that's their call. I doubt it would be that bad, but if they were willing to go through that to be a US citizen, well, citizens with that kind of enthusiasm would be a welcome addition, eh?

My guess is that today's immigrants would have an easier time of than they did 90 years ago.



SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:37 AM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
I'm just interjecting that roughly 10% of the entire population of Mexico resides in the US. Does that seem weird to anyone else?


Just as a thought experiment, try crunching the numbers on what would happen if the entire population of Mexico moved to the US.

It's the end-of-the-world scenario for those who want to shut our borders. Likelihood of it happening, even with an open-door immigration policy, is so low as to be negligible. And the results surprised me (especially if you compare it to the percentage of foreign born and non-English speaking Americans of the total population during the late nineteenth, early twentieth, centuries).

*edited to add one table:
http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0029/tab02.html

* edited again. Mexico population at about 100 million. 10% already here. Using numbers from above link and census data from 2000.
year (percentage of population foreign born)
1850 (9.68%)
1860 (13.16%)
1870 (14.44%)
1880 (13.32%)
1890 (14.77%)
1900 (13.61%)
1910 (14.70%)
1920 (13.17%)
1930 (11.57%)
1940 (8.81%)
1950 (6.89%)
1960 (5.43%)
1970 (4.73%)
1980 (6.22%)
1990 (7.95%)
2000 (11.05%)
2000 + 90 million from Mexico (32.61%)

We could absorb the entire population of Mexico and the entire foreign born population of the United States would be a third of the total population.

As it stands, the foreign born population of the US is proportionally below historical highs (although moving in that direction).

I can't find the data I used for the language numbers. So I'll withdraw that part.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:52 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by SergeantX:
I don't really buy any of this. I know it's the 'conventional wisdom', but it seems like a convenient rationalization for more selfish motives.



In your opinion, what do you think these selfish motives are?

Quote:


We've all got our 'indiscretions'. Or our immigrant ancestors certainly did.



I agree that we all have our indiscretions. I was trying to politely state that it would be nice to know, at the very least, if any of the new immigrants have criminal records in their countries of origin.

Quote:


Living in camps? Well, I guess that's their call. I doubt it would be that bad, but if they were willing to go through that to be a US citizen, well, citizens with that kind of enthusiasm would be a welcome addition, eh?



In my neck of the woods, finding any type of housing is becoming increasingly difficult. Lower cost or affordable housing is almost non-existant. I guess you could 'suggest' certain areas of the Country where immigrants could settle based on socio-economic factors.

Quote:


My guess is that today's immigrants would have an easier time of than they did 90 years ago.



I agree with this statement if the immigrants come to America with some funds. Unfortunately a number of immigrants come to America because they are trying to escape the low standard of living in their Countries of origin. I'm not against immigration at all. I just think it should be somewhat controlled to ensure the newcomers both pay into the 'system' as well as reap the benefits of the 'system'.

Letting in too many people too fast may actually solve the illegal immigration problem. As numbers grow and services cannot keep up, Folks might start moving on (or up ) to greener pastures.





De-lurking to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 8:09 AM

HIPPIEBROWNCOAT


Here's my end-all-written-in-stone answer for when i rule the world: (that's sarcasm-i know it doesn't always come through in my typing.)

Anybody wants into America, let them in. Put em in a six week camp where they will learn to speak basic English, begin to learn reading (if they don't already know), tip their waitstaff, locate their family or friends, and undergo a physical to ensure that they are not carrying smallpox or plague, and background checks to ensure they are not known violent felons. Citizenship is awarded at the end of their six weeks. Bus them to the city of their choice, a one-way one-time ticket. Bam. Hundereds of new citizens each day. People needing homes and places to work and shop and recreate. Federal taxes will apply. They are allowed to vote and go to school, all that citizenship jazz we all take for granted. Employers have no reason to pay them lower wages or cash under the table, so we have no reason to fear for our jobs. (the manufacturing and other factory jobs are being shipped to...Mexico, anyways...give it time, we'll all be in Texas trying to go to Mexico for factory work anyhoo!) New immigrants will be able to speak English and write, at least a little bit, so they are less likely to be exploited in a sweatshop or in the red-light districts. My view is that most Mexican immigrants are coming here to work. Are we so threatened by that? Anti-Irish and anti-Chinese movements caused riots and injust laws at their own points in time, when Irish and Chinese were coming here in masses. Mexicans are just the new kids on the block. And having worked side by side with Mexican immigrants (or maybe illegals, i dunno) for years in restaurants, i know firsthand that they work hard. Restaurant work is hard stuff, and most of the guys i knew had two jobs. They work hard, go home, pay taxes, maybe have a beer or smoke a j. Just like the rest of us. What's the problem?

That's just my way of thinking.

Oh, i am a tweaked one, yes i am...

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 8:27 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Hey Soupcatcher,

The thing I was thinking about is not that there are 'so many' Mexicans in the US, but that they are allowed to vote in Mexican elections. I haven't thought it through as to what kind of vote motivations that might inspire, but I think it could put a spin on the voting.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 8:38 AM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Hey Soupcatcher,

The thing I was thinking about is not that there are 'so many' Mexicans in the US, but that they are allowed to vote in Mexican elections. I haven't thought it through as to what kind of vote motivations that might inspire, but I think it could put a spin on the voting.


Hey Rue,

Yeah. I don't know quite what to do about the voting. On one hand I think if you plan on living in a country and raising your kids there you shouldn't be voting in the country you came from. On the other hand, if you can't vote in the country you live in and raise your kids in, at least you can vote somewhere.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:03 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
We could absorb the entire population of Mexico and the entire foreign born population of the United States would be a third of the total population.



But what about China? They could ship three or four hundred million potential voters over here and not even miss them. Elect a bunch of commissars and proceed to amend the constitution out of existence and put us all on a diet of fishheads and rice while they ship our SUVs and plasma TVs to Beijing.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:10 AM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
But what about China? They could ship three or four hundred million potential voters over here and not even miss them. Elect a bunch of commissars and proceed to amend the constitution out of existence and put us all on a diet of fishheads and rice while they ship our SUVs and plasma TVs to Beijing.


The operative word here being ship.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 4:51 PM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
In your opinion, what do you think these selfish motives are?


Not that you have such motives, but I hear this sort of reasoning frequently from people who are also willing to admit that mostly they're worried about someone 'taking their job', or milking our welfare systems.

Whatever. Jobs aren't some limited resource. A job isn't something you own, it's something you do. No one 'takes' a job from someone else simply because they start working too.

Quote:


In my neck of the woods, finding any type of housing is becoming increasingly difficult. Lower cost or affordable housing is almost non-existant. I guess you could 'suggest' certain areas of the Country where immigrants could settle based on socio-economic factors.



I believe it's still legal to build more houses.
Quote:


Quote:


My guess is that today's immigrants would have an easier time of than they did 90 years ago.


Unfortunately a number of immigrants come to America because they are trying to escape the low standard of living in their Countries of origin. I'm not against immigration at all. I just think it should be somewhat controlled to ensure the newcomers both pay into the 'system' as well as reap the benefits of the 'system'.



I'm not sure what you mean by 'system'. The vast majority of our immigrants have come here looking for opportunity, usually to escape a serious lack of it in their previous homes. It's part of what makes them motivated, hard working taxpayers.

If there's something about the 'system' that will break because people come here looking for freedom and opportunity, then there's something wrong with the 'system', not with the immigrants.



SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:21 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Whatever. Jobs aren't some limited resource. A job isn't something you own, it's something you do. No one 'takes' a job from someone else simply because they start working too.
This is exactly where you're wrong. Under capitalism, jobs ARE limited. And furthermore, since they're limited by aggregate consumption, people coming in and willing to work for... fostering CHEAP jobs... creates a double whammy on the economy and sends the economy spiraling in another direction.


---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:40 PM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
This is exactly where you're wrong. Under capitalism, jobs ARE limited. And furthermore, since they're limited by aggregate consumption, people coming in and willing to work for... fostering CHEAP jobs... creates a double whammy on the economy and sends the economy spiraling in another direction.



So there's a cap on jobs? Better get me one before we run out! Maybe I'll get an extra to keep in storage.

C'mon, that holds up to pretty much no scrutiny. Performing valuable work isn't a zero-sum game. The more people work, the wealthier we all get. Someone working on the other side of town doesn't prevent you from doing likewise. '

Seriously, how exactly are jobs limited by 'aggregate consumption'?



SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 4:47 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by SergeantX:
Jobs aren't some limited resource. A job isn't something you own, it's something you do. No one 'takes' a job from someone else simply because they start working too.



Unless that person is willing to do the same job for less money.

Quote:


I believe it's still legal to build more houses.



Where do I start with this comment. Who is going to build these houses? Who will pay for the raw materials? How will services such as water, sewage, electricity, and gas be supplied to all of these new houses. I suppose these new suburbs will require roads and perhaps bus or train service. It is simple to say if new houses are needed they should be built. Much more complex of an issue when you really start to look at it.

Quote:


I'm not sure what you mean by 'system'. The vast majority of our immigrants have come here looking for opportunity, usually to escape a serious lack of it in their previous homes. It's part of what makes them motivated, hard working taxpayers.

If there's something about the 'system' that will break because people come here looking for freedom and opportunity, then there's something wrong with the 'system', not with the immigrants.



So every person that comes across the Mexican border will immediately be fluent in English, know the Constitution and the laws of the land, walk into their newly built and paid for house, get a job and fill out their tax forms. Once again a great sentiment, but not realistic.

De-lurking to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 5:42 AM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
So every person that comes across the Mexican border will immediately be fluent in English, know the Constitution and the laws of the land, walk into their newly built and paid for house, get a job and fill out their tax forms. Once again a great sentiment, but not realistic.



You're right, that's not realistic, but it's not my sentiment. No, most of them would show up flat broke, complete newbs in a foreign land. Pretty much like all of our families were when they first got here.

But, they'll build houses (or maybe they'd start with the tents you mentioned), they'd begin to learn the language. Constitution? It wouldn't surprise me if many of them already know it better than your average citizen. The tax man will catch up to them soon after.

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 5:58 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

C'mon, that holds up to pretty much no scrutiny. Performing valuable work isn't a zero-sum game
It is under capitalism. How do you suppose they get the Irish to compete with the Costa Ricans for electronics jobs, and the Marians to compete with Haiti for clothing assembly, and the Chinese to compete with the Indians, and EVERYONE to compete with the USA? I DO have solutions but none of them involve denying the problem or playing their game.

---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 6:06 AM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

C'mon, that holds up to pretty much no scrutiny. Performing valuable work isn't a zero-sum game
It is under capitalism....



I'm not sure what you mean I guess. It's not like you can prevent people from working to make their lives better - and that's essentially all a 'job' is. If someone collects junk no one else wants and recycles it (for example), that's a job. Work isn't a limited commodity that can be hoarded or denied others. I'm not getting how or why you're seeing it that way.



SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 6:21 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Work isn't a limited commodity that can be hoarded or denied others. I'm not getting how or why you're seeing it that way.
Work that involves using complex tools or distant trade IS a limited commodity. When was the last time you assembled an automobile or made your own antibiotics or sold oranges to Canada or built an office building? If you fall out of the economic structure you can survive by living on a garbage dump or hammering out belt buckles from tin cans on a street corner but that is not the kind of economy I would wish to create.

---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 6:55 AM

ONETOOMANY


I'm curious as to what country everybody here is from or what age. I see alot of comments that show some of the people here don't have enough direct experience (such as worked in the manufacturing, construction,or service fields) or haven't done proper research on what our (the U.S) neighboring countries require for people to move to them. I suggest these links:

MEXICO IMMIGRATION:

http://www.mexperience.com/liveandwork/immigration.htm#ImmPolicy

CANADA IMMIGRATION:

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/index.html

Look at these sites & see just what other countries require for immigration before stating how WE should just let peolpe in. ALSO if you don't live in the US you don't get to have a DAMN opinion about how we should respond to our immigration problem. Deal with your own by letting in as many people as you want & see what the results are. By the way I challenge anyone to find an industrialized country with a stable economy that has a working open border policy like the one suggested for the US.
-------------------------------------------------


Notice anythig particular 'bout our luck these past few days, any kind'a pattern'. You depend on luck you end up on the drift no fuel, no prospects, beggin for alliance make work getiin' towed off to the scrap out THAT AIN'T US NOT EVER

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 7:54 AM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
...but that is not the kind of economy I would wish to create.



Hmmm. Well, we've all got our preferences I suppose. But you seem convinced that anyone who 'falls outside the economic structure' (which interpret to mean isn't working for an 'employer') is somehow digging through trash. It's not really that way. Working as an "independent" actually has many perks and can be very rewarding. I've done it many times in my life and I find it very reassuring to know that it's an option. Working isn't always about begging 'the man' for a 'job'.

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 9:11 AM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by ONETOOMANY:
Look at these sites & see just what other countries require for immigration before stating how WE should just let peolpe in.


And look at what is written on the Canadian and Mexican Statues of Liberty. Those hypocrites! Seriously though, If you don't see that our country has a unique history in terms of immigrants, then we're talking past each other.
Quote:

Originally posted by ONETOOMANY:
ALSO if you don't live in the US you don't get to have a DAMN opinion about how we should respond to our immigration problem. Deal with your own by letting in as many people as you want & see what the results are.


It's one thing to state that you give no credence to the opinion of someone who doesn't live in the US on this particular topic. I could see the logic of that. It's another to state that people can't have an opinion on a topic. That's just silly.
Quote:

Originally posted by ONETOOMANY:
By the way I challenge anyone to find an industrialized country with a stable economy that has a working open border policy like the one suggested for the US.


That's exactly the policy that the US had for more than half of our existence. We seemed to do alright.

To satisfy my own curiousity, would you mind answering some questions?

What is the size of the community that you live in? (rural, town, etc - or just ballpark it by order of magnitude: hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, etc.).

What region of the US do you live in?

Do you live in a suburb that was established after 1900?

What are the demographics of your community?

Did the demographics of your community substantially change after 1890 and then remain consistently homogenized (wrt skin color) until only recently?

The reason why I'm asking these questions is because I'm curious about the whole, "why now," with respect to the immigration debate on a national level.


* edited to add: Just to expand on the last sentence. I grew up in Los Angeles - where the illegal immigration debate has been ongoing from well before I was born. So it's a surprise to me that, all of a sudden, the entire country is having it. Where were you all decades ago? One possible explanation I've read is that communities that previously had not had an immigrant population now do. That a number of predominantly white communities, and communities that became all-white by design in the 1890s (sundown cities) or suburbs that were created all-white by design after 1900 (sundown suburbs), were becoming less all-white. So I'm curious if you come from a sundown city or sundown suburb.

* edited one more time to add: I want to specifically say that when I say immigrant in the preceding paragraph what I mean is the subset of immigrants who are not white. This is for the simple reason that I have not seen any argument from the "build a wall" folks that we have a European immigrant problem. For the most part, the complaint is about Mexicans. Since the only group that people seem to have a problem with are non-white, I will only address non-white immigration. And also you will note that I have not asked what your skin color is because I feel the environment a person grows up in is more relevant to this discussion, especially if that environment is one which has historically embraced racism.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 9:16 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


My sister works as an "independent" (editor) but not by choice. In her view, it sucks, especially the "no benefits" part. If you live in a nation with universal health care or you're young and healthy that might not bother you too much, but if you're 50+ or you have children that's a different story.

---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 9:53 AM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
My sister works as an "independent" (editor) but not by choice. In her view, it sucks, especially the "no benefits" part.



Different strokes, etc.. It definitely has its drawbacks.



SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 11:18 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by SoupCatcher:

* edited one more time to add: I want to specifically say that when I say immigrant in the preceding paragraph what I mean is the subset of immigrants who are not white. This is for the simple reason that I have not seen any argument from the "build a wall" folks that we have a European immigrant problem. For the most part, the complaint is about Mexicans. Since the only group that people seem to have a problem with are non-white, I will only address non-white immigration.



Hey Soupcatcher,
I like your post, especially the part about opinions, you beat me to the punch.

There is no European immigrant problem because of the Atlantic Ocean.

De-lurking to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 12:14 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Soupcatcher,

I suspect the reason why 'immigration' has become such a hot topic is b/c Bush wants it prominently on the agenda. After all, who trumpeted the issue in the first place? It makes for better speeches than Afghanistan (that is soooooooo over) and the embarrassment that is Iraq.

My observation is that angst happens whenever the neighborhood changes. I don't think it's dictated by ethnicity, citizenship, or skin color. The new group just has to be, well, new - and different in some way. When blacks (who were not immigrants) moved into certain neighborhoods in Buffalo, the (immigrant) Polish people moved out. When Polish, Italian and Irish immigrants moved in in the early 1900's, the previous 'other' white people moved out. And so on. (BTW it's humiliating to me that a group with which I could be identified (Polish) could be so closed-minded.)

Angst aside, I think there's the practical upside and the downside to the US from immigration. An added consideration is there may be an assumed duty from past, present and future US meddling which have helped create unlivable conditions elsewhere. And hence have created the drive for immigration.

But the US is not the only 'immigrant' country on the planet. There is Canada, New Zealand and Australia. And the US is not the only country to have created horrific conditions around the globe and then received the results. Western and wealthy Commonwealth countries tend to have a large number of immigrants from other Commonwealth countries - former British colonies.

I think the US has the right to control its borders, just like any other country. I think the US SHOULD control its borders. The only benefit to the US from sloppy border control is to businesses who hire illegals.

If the US has a moral debt to the people of other countries (and I believe it does), it should make it up by action directed at the other countries - reversing the original harmful action directed at the other countries. (Not there is a prayer of that happening. It's just that I don't see the equity of 'allowing' illegal immigrants to be slightly less victimized in the US - oh, and victimizing US workers in the process - as a way of atoning for the victimization in their own country.)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 1:12 PM

SOUPCATCHER


BigDamnNobody,

Thanks. I would feel a lot more sanguine about our ability to implement an effective immigration policy, with respect to overseas immigrants, if we were actually investing in upgrading our port security.


Rue,

I agree that the main reason why the immigration debate is taking place now is a Republican desire to use this for GOTV. But there's resonance there. In their cynical manipulating they have tapped into something. It's the something they tapped into that I'm interested in.

And I also agree that we need to have an equitable and enforceable immigration policy that does a lot more than just allow an unvoting working class into the country who can be exploited by big business. The one we have now clearly doesn't work. However, I don't think open borders will work either. A serious debate on our immigration policy is necessary, IMHO. But, and this is a big but, I don't think many of the people complaining about illegal immigration are interested in a serious debate.

If they were serious they would educate themselves (or maybe I'm being naive). Far too often I read arguments from people that show a lack of understanding of our historical immigration policy. Or a lack of understanding of the statistics on illegal immigration. Or a lack of understanding on the statistics of language acquisition of illegal immigrants.

All of these things are areas that I am still learning a lot about. But it doesn't take much learning to see that many of the people arguing for closed borders are repeating unfounded stereotypes. In other words, they are ranting. And the substance of the rants leads me to believe that their real problem is with the immigrants themselves.

I'm still trying to decide how much of a factor the color of an immigrant's skin is in the angst. One of the reasons I focussed in on that is because I'm reading, Sundown Towns by James Loewen. Well, I'm reading a few pages, getting really pissed and putting the book down, and then reading a few pages the next day. And it is eye-opening to me how many communities went all-white starting in the 1890s. And stayed all-white until only recently. Whole swaths of the midwest (and many areas in the rest of the country - with the exception of the south) expelled their black American populations and kept them out, pushing them from the rural areas into the major cities. And then bands of all-white suburbs sprang up that, in effect, penned them in those cities.

One of the things I've learned in my life is that it is easy to fear and hate a group with which you have no contact. And we have had communities across the country where generations have grown up who had little or no contact with people who did not look like them. Or, it was in the context of, at sundown they better get the hell out of town. And these were communities that were born, in this particular incarnation, through explicit racist actions (whether it was through burning out, or lynching, or just the threat of violence, or because no one would rent or sell to you, or because the sheriff escorted you to the border of the town, or any of a number of ways). That's decades and decades of festering racism learned on your parent's knee.

Now the huge agribusiness that owns all the neighboring farmland is using illegal immigrant labor and there is an influx of people who aren't white and speak English with an accent (or don't even trust their English enough to speak at all in that language). And the lid comes off.

I'm just speculating. But it seems reasonable that a lot of the angst is coming from forced contact in areas of the country where contact had been previously avoided.

I'm not sure how good an example this is, but let me try it on. I grew up in a neighborhood of Los Angeles called Glassell Park that is on the northeast side of the 2/5 interchange (which might not mean much). Close enough to downtown to get there in less than ten minutes on surface streets but buffered from downtown by geography (hills and the river) and freeways. Right next door to Glendale where I went to elementary, junior high, and high school.

I didn't realize it until I started reading the book but Glendale was a sundown city. And when I found that out a lot of things clicked into place. I remembered my dad, who also grew up in northeast LA, saying that you couldn't be out on the streets of Glendale after dark if you were black. And I remembered when I was in elementary school and a classmate was complaining that a black family had moved into Glenoaks canyon. And I remembered the hell that broke loose starting in the eighties when Glendale experienced an Armenian immigration. And all of this is taking place in what is arguably the most diverse urban area in the world.

Not sure where to from here. I think I'll just end the rambling .

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 1:44 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Soupcatcher,

I appreciate your rambling. Please ramble on.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 2:28 PM

ONETOOMANY



Quote:

Originally posted by ONETOOMANY:
ALSO if you don't live in the US you don't get to have a DAMN opinion about how we should respond to our immigration problem. Deal with your own by letting in as many people as you want & see what the results are.


Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
It's one thing to state that you give no credence to the opinion of someone who doesn't live in the US on this particular topic. I could see the logic of that. It's another to state that people can't have an opinion on a topic. That's just silly.



sure I see your point, but if you don't live here or are not directly affected by a situation then your opinion carries no wieght. Stop waisting time

Quote:

Originally posted by ONETOOMANY:
By the way I challenge anyone to find an industrialized country with a stable economy that has a working open border policy like the one suggested for the US.


Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
That's exactly the policy that the US had for more than half of our existence. We seemed to do alright.



I suppose, but what is the difference in population between now and 100 years ago. You still didn't answer my question. I'm talking about
more recent times.

Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
To satisfy my own curiousity, would you mind answering some questions?

What is the size of the community that you live in? (rural, town, etc - or just ballpark it by order of magnitude: hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, etc.).

What region of the US do you live in?

Do you live in a suburb that was established after 1900?

What are the demographics of your community?

Did the demographics of your community substantially change after 1890 and then remain consistently homogenized (wrt skin color) until only recently?

The reason why I'm asking these questions is because I'm curious about the whole, "why now," with respect to the immigration debate on a national level.



Ok, I'll answer a few of your questions. Right now I live in the NW US, but grew up in AZ, CA, & TX. I lived in mostly mid to lower class areas of large cities. The immigration debate is nothing new to me.

Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
* edited to add: Just to expand on the last sentence. I grew up in Los Angeles - where the illegal immigration debate has been ongoing from well before I was born. So it's a surprise to me that, all of a sudden, the entire country is having it. Where were you all decades ago? One possible explanation I've read is that communities that previously had not had an immigrant population now do. That a number of predominantly white communities, and communities that became all-white by design in the 1890s (sundown cities) or suburbs that were created all-white by design after 1900 (sundown suburbs), were becoming less all-white. So I'm curious if you come from a sundown city or sundown suburb.


* edited one more time to add: I want to specifically say that when I say immigrant in the preceding paragraph what I mean is the subset of immigrants who are not white. This is for the simple reason that I have not seen any argument from the "build a wall" folks that we have a European immigrant problem. For the most part, the complaint is about Mexicans. Since the only group that people seem to have a problem with are non-white, I will only address non-white immigration. And also you will note that I have not asked what your skin color is because I feel the environment a person grows up in is more relevant to this discussion, especially if that environment is one which has historically embraced racism.



This is kind of interesting because not once did I mention anything about race or what countries I was talking about.(I listed Canada & Mexcio as Exapmles of what our bordering countries require) You have managed to turn the whole thing into a matter of racism.

If yo're even going to broach the subject of race in immigration you have to include everyone that means "white" immigrants (which in the NW a good deal of the immigrants are "white"), but when I say immigrant I'm talking about anybody. I don't care who you are, where your from, what your doing, what your race, gender, sexual orientation, height, weight, or name is.

All I care about is that if you come here you do it legally or if you do immigrate illegally that you take steps te get legal citizenship as soon as possible, not several years later. Which is only the same thing most every other country requires. I'm not saying close the borders, but everybody has to jump through hoops to immigrate anywhere in the world. Why should it be any different to immigrate here?


I'm just tired of people stating open border policy opinions when they don't live here or don't have any experience with the situation. That's it.. That's all.. Nothing about race or ethnicity what so ever.

So I'm sorry If I offended anyone, but soupcatcher it's pretty fk'd for you to make me out as a racist.
----------------------------------------------

Notice anythig particular 'bout our luck these past few days, any kind'a pattern'. You depend on luck you end up on the drift no fuel, no prospects, beggin for alliance make work getiin' towed off to the scrap out THAT AIN'T US NOT EVER

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 2:42 PM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by ONETOOMANY:
Ok, I'll answer a few of your questions. Right now I live in the NW US, but grew up in AZ, CA, & TX. I lived in mostly mid to lower class areas of large cities. The immigration debate is nothing new to me.

...

This is kind of interesting because not once did I mention anything about race or what countries I was talking about.(I listed Canada & Mexcio as Exapmles of what our bordering countries require) You have managed to turn the whole thing into a matter of racism.

If yo're even going to broach the subject of race in immigration you have to include everyone that means "white" immigrants (which in the NW a good deal of the immigrants are "white"), but when I say immigrant I'm talking about anybody. I don't care who you are, where your from, what your doing, what your race, gender, sexual orientation, height, weight, or name is.

All I care about is that if you come here you do it legally or if you do immigrate illegally that you take steps te get legal citizenship as soon as possible, not several years later. Which is only the same thing most every other country requires. I'm not saying close the borders, but everybody has to jump through hoops to immigrate anywhere in the world. Why should it be any different to immigrate here?


I'm just tired of people stating open border policy opinions when they don't live here or don't have any experience with the situation. That's it.. That's all.. Nothing about race or ethnicity what so ever.

So I'm sorry If I offended anyone, but soupcatcher it's pretty fk'd for you to make me out as a racist.
----------------------------------------------


Fair enough. My assumptions were wrong.

* edited to add: I should say, my assumptions probably do not apply to you.

And, guess what, race relations in the US are pretty fk'd up.

* edited one more time: As to me calling you a racist. I don't think I did that.

What I did was to ask about the environment you grew up in. Then I went on to speculate that attitudes about illegal immigration are shaped by the environment that people grow up in and described specific racist enviroments (sundown towns or suburbs) and that I would expect racist attitudes about immigrants to come from people who grew up in those racist environments.

By your responses, it appears that you probably did not grow up in a sundown town or suburb. So why would you think that I was directing the remainder of what I wrote as labelling you as racist? It wouldn't apply. You may or may not be a racist. I have no clue.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 3:21 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hey Soup I appreciate the rambling too.

I come from a family of immigrants. My parent's generation lived in a little community with it's own foreign-language newspaper, radio, church and store that sold traditional food. All of our holidays had a cultural twist. Some of my relatives never learned English well. I had a relationship with an Indian (from Mumbai) and a crush on a Costa Rican. I married an immigrant. I've known, worked with, studied with, and hired people who travel across the Mexican border and who have families and property on both sides. I've enjoyed the company of people from all over the world: India, China, Japan, Ethiopia, Myanmar, the Phillipines, Guatemala, the aforementioned Mexico, and elsewhere.

And yet I come down against illegal immigration in a very visceral way. I've tried puzzling this out. I don't think it's racist because I've just been too close to too many people of all skin colors. It's certainly not for lack of knowledge about "hispanics".

I think it's mainly a matter of the immigrants' class, which predicts other factors like education and economic role. We have a lot of immigrants here from all over the world- Taiwan and mainland China, Vietnam, Korea, and Mexico, and the Phillipines as well as a significant black population. The reaction to one group or another can be predicted by the wealth of that group: Taiwanese who immigrated voluntarily came from middle or upper-class families, while Vietnamese who came here catastrophically and with nothing are looked on less favorably. So maybe I'm not a racist so much as I am a... snob?

To solve the problem of racism, simply rubbing elbows with "the help" or with "kids at school" is not going to break stereotypes or promote understanding. The only thing that REALLY rattles people's brains is being confronted with "the other" when that person is in a position of POWER- your black male teacher, your Spanish-speaking surgeon, the female cop who's writing your ticket- because you are forced to acknowledge their authority and deal with it.

---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 3:25 PM

ONETOOMANY




Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
Fair enough. My assumptions were wrong.

* edited to add: I should say, my assumptions probably do not apply to you.

And, guess what, race relations in the US are pretty fk'd up.



Your BlSht assumptions about me deffinitly don't apply.

And, guess what, I never said they weren't.
---------------------------------------------

Notice anythig particular 'bout our luck these past few days, any kind'a pattern'. You depend on luck you end up on the drift no fuel, no prospects, beggin for alliance make work getiin' towed off to the scrap out THAT AIN'T US NOT EVER

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 3:26 PM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by ONETOOMANY:


Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
Fair enough. My assumptions were wrong.

* edited to add: I should say, my assumptions probably do not apply to you.

And, guess what, race relations in the US are pretty fk'd up.



Your BlSht assumptions about me deffinitly don't apply.

And, guess what, I never said they weren't.
---------------------------------------------

Notice anythig particular 'bout our luck these past few days, any kind'a pattern'. You depend on luck you end up on the drift no fuel, no prospects, beggin for alliance make work getiin' towed off to the scrap out THAT AIN'T US NOT EVER


I'll repost what I added to the earlier post since we're cross posting.

As to me calling you a racist. I don't think I did that.

What I did was to ask about the environment you grew up in. Then I went on to speculate that attitudes about illegal immigration are shaped by the environment that people grow up in and described specific racist enviroments (sundown towns or suburbs) and that I would expect racist attitudes about immigrants to come from people who grew up in those racist environments.

By your responses, it appears that you probably did not grow up in a sundown town or suburb. So why would you think that I was directing the remainder of what I wrote as labelling you as racist? It wouldn't apply. You may or may not be a racist. I have no clue.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 3:49 PM

ONETOOMANY


Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
Quote:

Originally posted by ONETOOMANY:


Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
Fair enough. My assumptions were wrong.

* edited to add: I should say, my assumptions probably do not apply to you.

And, guess what, race relations in the US are pretty fk'd up.



Your BlSht assumptions about me deffinitly don't apply.

And, guess what, I never said they weren't.
---------------------------------------------

Notice anythig particular 'bout our luck these past few days, any kind'a pattern'. You depend on luck you end up on the drift no fuel, no prospects, beggin for alliance make work getiin' towed off to the scrap out THAT AIN'T US NOT EVER


I'll repost what I added to the earlier post since we're cross posting.

As to me calling you a racist. I don't think I did that.

What I did was to ask about the environment you grew up in. Then I went on to speculate that attitudes about illegal immigration are shaped by the environment that people grow up in and described specific racist enviroments (sundown towns or suburbs) and that I would expect racist attitudes about immigrants to come from people who grew up in those racist environments.

By your responses, it appears that you probably did not grow up in a sundown town or suburb. So why would you think that I was directing the remainder of what I wrote as labelling you as racist? It wouldn't apply. You may or may not be a racist. I have no clue.



It's not so much that you directly label me a racist it's that you went on to "speculate" about the environment of my upbringing. By your line of questioning you infer form the begining that my choice in opinion might be racially motivated. Why would you automatically assume that because someone is against illegal immigration that race is a factor in thier discision.

I still stand by my original post. Which had nothing to do with race at all.

Quote:


Originally posted by ONETOOMANY:
I'm curious as to what country everybody here is from or what age. I see alot of comments that show some of the people here don't have enough direct experience (such as worked in the manufacturing, construction,or service fields) or haven't done proper research on what our (the U.S) neighboring countries require for people to move to them. I suggest these links:

MEXICO IMMIGRATION:

http://www.mexperience.com/liveandwork/immigration.htm#ImmPolicy

CANADA IMMIGRATION:

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/index.html

Look at these sites & see just what other countries require for immigration before stating how WE should just let peolpe in. ALSO if you don't live in the US you don't get to have a DAMN opinion about how we should respond to our immigration problem. Deal with your own by letting in as many people as you want & see what the results are. By the way I challenge anyone to find an industrialized country with a stable economy that has a working open border policy like the one suggested for the US.


-------------------------------------------

Notice anythig particular 'bout our luck these past few days, any kind'a pattern'. You depend on luck you end up on the drift no fuel, no prospects, beggin for alliance make work getiin' towed off to the scrap out THAT AIN'T US NOT EVER

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 4:05 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


SignyM and Soupcatcher,

This has to do with what the both of you have posted.

SignyM - I don't think you are a snob and this is the reason why: Suppose you are in your familiar neighborhood and a Japanese family moves in next door. They are well-educated, somewhat better off than you, but keep to themselves. To me that seems OK.

Now suppose rather than 1 family moving in, it is 20 families. They are all well-educated, better off than you, and keep to themselves speaking Japanese together but rarely addressing you in English. No so OK. The uncomfortable feeling I get isn't about their economic status or mine - or yours, I suspect.

Now suppose the large group of new-comers aren't Japanese, they are British. They are all well-educated, somewhat better off than you, and speak to you in English, when they do speak to you at all. They dress a little differently, have somewhat different social values and expectations etc. Not so uncomfortable as the large-scale Japanese influx, but not OK either.

Suppose you go to Japan - you are surrounded by Japanese. You immerse yourself in the experience with delight. So the issue with the Japanese 'invasion' of your neighborhood isn't specifically about being a cultural minority either.

When I was going to university the neighborhood was alive with people from everywhere around the globe, and I thought it was great !

So what is the difference between good and bad experiences with 'those others'?


Soupcatcher,

Perhaps some of what I'm imagining has to do with the influx of people who are 'different' into previously all-white neighborhoods. It may not necessarily be racist, but might be expressed as racists comments. (Snobby Japs. Snooty Brits.)

I wish HK would show up. He's really good at puzzling this out.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 4:30 PM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by ONETOOMANY:
It's not so much that you directly label me a racist it's that you went on to "speculate" about the environment of my upbringing. By your line of questioning you infer form the begining that my choice in opinion might be racially motivated. Why would you automatically assume that because someone is against illegal immigration that race is a factor in thier discision.

I still stand by my original post. Which had nothing to do with race at all.


I can see how you would get that impression from my comments.

To address the question you raise (and sort of touch on Signym's post): Why would I automatically assume that because someone is against illegal immigration that race is a factor in their decision? I'm not sure I completely buy your premise but I'll attempt to answer. It is one of the first thoughts that crosses my mind when the topic comes up, that's true. Automatic, no. But, and this is the important part, if the rhetoric that is used sounds anything like the rhetoric used by the Minutemen and their supporters then it causes my antenna to twitch. If it is a well laid out argument against illegal immigration that makes substantive points (like Signym's or other's posts) then I don't make the assumption.

My reasoning is pretty simple. Would this thread even exist if it hadn't been for the Minutemen doing their border patrol publicity stunt? Would we be having this discussion now? I believe the answer is no. The Minutemen are a bunch of different groups with ties to white supremacist organizations. They use much of the same language that white supremacists use when talking about illegal immigrants. They were given a substantial nationwide media platform and received an outpouring of support. This led to a nationwide discussion about illegal immigration, of which this thread is a small part. I think it's a worthwhile debate to have but I want to make damn certain that we don't use their racist framing or perpetuate their inaccuracies.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 4:30 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


If you give a damn about uSA, then speak in public to your City Council and propose this same ordinance.
Quote:


Small Pa. City Passes Law Against Illegals

By MARK SCOLFORO
The Associated Press
Thursday, July 13, 2006; 9:50 PM

HAZLETON, Pa. -- The City Council approved a law Thursday night designed to make this small city in northeastern Pennsylvania among the most hostile places in the U.S. for illegal immigrants to live or work.

The 4-to-1 vote came after nearly two hours of passionate debate. Opponents argued it was divisive and possibly illegal, but supporters said illegal immigrants' growing numbers have damaged the quality of life here.

"We must draw the line, and we are doing it tonight," Mayor Lou Barletta told a packed council chambers.

Barletta proposed the Illegal Immigration Relief Act last month as a response to what he said were Hazleton's problems with violent crime, crowded schools, hospital costs and the demand for services.

The ordinance would deny licenses to businesses that employ illegal immigrants, fine landlords $1,000 for each illegal immigrant discovered renting their properties, and require city documents to be in English only.

"The illegal citizens, I would recommend they leave," Barletta said after the meeting.

"What you see here tonight, really, is a city that wants to take back what America has given it," said the mayor, who said he wore a bulletproof vest to the meeting.

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/13/AR20060713015
47.html



Great idea.

Here in Tennessee, our gangsters in govt profited by selling 250,000 driver licenses to illegal aliens. Tennessee copsters, prosecutors and judges refuse to arrest and deport illegal aliens arrested perping other crimes, since there's more profit. Traffic tickets profit copsters $500 for each illegal alien. Tennessee Driver License Handbooks are printed in Mexican language, and the test is given in Mexican by Tennessee Highway Patrol. When I go to a restaurant with my 70-year-old friend, he is carded for ID when buying a beer, but that same restaurant refuses to card illegal aliens, who sit next to us speaking only Mexican.

Jr Bush's GOP amnesty program will legalize 40-million criminals and invite another 200-million criminals to uSA in the next 10 years, according to Heritage Foundation. And the sheeple love it. Baaaaaa.


Most people can't think, most of the remainder won't think, the small fraction who do think mostly can't do it very well. The extremely tiny fraction who think regularly, accurately, creatively, and without self-delusion- in the long run these are the only people who count.
—Robert A. Heinlein

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 14, 2006 7:33 PM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Hey Soup I appreciate the rambling too.

I come from a family of immigrants. My parent's generation lived in a little community with it's own foreign-language newspaper, radio, church and store that sold traditional food. All of our holidays had a cultural twist. Some of my relatives never learned English well. I had a relationship with an Indian (from Mumbai) and a crush on a Costa Rican. I married an immigrant. I've known, worked with, studied with, and hired people who travel across the Mexican border and who have families and property on both sides. I've enjoyed the company of people from all over the world: India, China, Japan, Ethiopia, Myanmar, the Phillipines, Guatemala, the aforementioned Mexico, and elsewhere.

And yet I come down against illegal immigration in a very visceral way. I've tried puzzling this out. I don't think it's racist because I've just been too close to too many people of all skin colors. It's certainly not for lack of knowledge about "hispanics".

I think it's mainly a matter of the immigrants' class, which predicts other factors like education and economic role. We have a lot of immigrants here from all over the world- Taiwan and mainland China, Vietnam, Korea, and Mexico, and the Phillipines as well as a significant black population. The reaction to one group or another can be predicted by the wealth of that group: Taiwanese who immigrated voluntarily came from middle or upper-class families, while Vietnamese who came here catastrophically and with nothing are looked on less favorably. So maybe I'm not a racist so much as I am a... snob?

To solve the problem of racism, simply rubbing elbows with "the help" or with "kids at school" is not going to break stereotypes or promote understanding. The only thing that REALLY rattles people's brains is being confronted with "the other" when that person is in a position of POWER- your black male teacher, your Spanish-speaking surgeon, the female cop who's writing your ticket- because you are forced to acknowledge their authority and deal with it.


Hey SignyM (just realized I'd been forgetting to capitalize the last M),

I think you've hit the nail on the head when you use the word visceral. For me it happens with language. Not written language. I could care less if the driving test or voting information is printed in a zillion languages (I'm actually happy people are taking the test and/or voting) and I think it's cool to see neon signs, store signs and billboards in languages other than English. It's the spoken language. I guess you could say that I have to work at not being a language snob. And I wonder how much of that is because I am fluent in only one language.

It's not like I've ever been unable to do what I wanted to because I couldn't communicate. There's nothing rational about it. And I don't interact with anyone on a regular basis who doesn't speak English at least well enough to communicate. I do find myself getting irritated when I'm in a group that all speak a language other than English and the conversation is primarily carried out in that language.

But I've never felt the need to learn a second language (Both my girlfriend and me are Mexican-American but were raised in English speaking households. My girlfriend learned Spanish in undergrad. I never got around to it). I have no idea how hard it would be to become fluent in a second language. So I try to cut a lot of slack. I have yet to meet an immigrant under the age of sixty who wasn't trying to learn or improve their English.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 15, 2006 2:35 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I have a very hard time learning languages. All that rote memorization! I used to be fluent in French, and I can stumble my way around German but that doesn't help when everyone around me is speaking Tagalog or Cantonese.

I think the reaction is visceral for nearly everyone and it comes from that fundamental dividing line between "us" and "them"... who you identify with. When my hispanic colleagues and I talk about the topic, they feel far more sympathy to illegals than I do because they feel part of that community. My spouse, who was a poor immigrant, identifies with poor immigrants... but not with wealthy ones. And almost everything you hear after that reaction is rationalization and window-dressing. Changing who you fundamentally identify with is not impossible, but it takes either years of insight or some life-changing event (like in Crash)... and that just is not going to happen to the vast majority of... the whole world. It's not just a USA problem.

I've learned to distrust my viscera so I try to keep it out of this equation. I'm willing to look at everything surrounding the question of illegal immigration, starting with "Do nations serve a legitimate purpose, or are they an artificial construct that divides more than unifies?"

Now I'm at the end of MY rambling.

Thanks for listening.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 15, 2006 7:42 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


I've read that there are two groups of psychologically 'normal' people who become paranoid at more than the ususal rate: those with facial deformities and the hearing impaired.

I think being visibly excluded from conversations by any means is similar to being hearing impaired, and it triggers the same discomfort. Having people converse in a different language in your presence is uncomfortable. Having people whisper in your presence or stop talking when you come up is also uncomfortable - even if they are speaking a language you understand. I don't think it's snobbery.

Both my parents, and all my aunts and uncles and grandparents spoke Polish but didn't teach it to my generation (my siblings and all 'the cousins'). So I have gotten used to Polish specifically being spoken around me, and it's a pleasant kind of thing. But I've noticed that doesn't extend to other languages.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 15, 2006 3:08 PM

SOUPCATCHER


I'm reminded of numerous family parties over the years where the language a person spoke at the party depended on the generation they were a part of. My brother dated and then eventually married a Visayan woman. This increased the size of our family tremendously. The youngest generation on her side of the family, the generation of my sister-in-law and her sisters and cousins, had either all been born in the US or were very young children when their parents emigrated. Their first language was English. Depending on the parents, the children's fluency in Visayan and Tagalog ranged from barely being able to understand to conversational. The parents had all learned English as a second language and were fluent albeit with varying thicknesses of accent. The grandparents had varying degrees of English fluency but, for the most part, did not speak the language at all.

So there were always two languages being spoken at the parties. The kids hung out together and communicated in English. The parents and grandparents hung out and spoke Visayan. Every so often the uncles would get bored and drag one of us away to drink with them. But I've found that it doesn't matter what language is being spoken as long as the booze is flowing. I can laugh and nod with the best of them, having no clue what is being talked about.

When one of my sister-in-law's sisters started dating a Hmung man I noticed the same thing at parties with his family.

I never felt irritated at those parties.

Contrast that with a time in undergrad when I was dating a woman from American Samoa. I learned very quickly that part of the package was that I would often be the only person at a party who didn't speak Samoan and that, for the vast majority of time, the only language being spoken at the party was Samoan. Pretty much all of our friends at those parties had grown up in American Samoa and left to come to college. So, while they were fluent in English, the language they were most comfortable with was their first language.

I sometimes got irritated and had to remind myself that I chose to be there. And there was always soemthing to do that didn't necessitate communication. I often put my lessons with the uncles to good effect.

Based on these experiences, it was no surprise to me to learn of the study on English language learning among immigrants. Basically, by the third generation (the grandchildren of those who emigrated, I think) all spoke English as a first language. All. Didn't matter what ethnic group. So when people complain about immigrants not speaking English I just shake my head and wonder how long it took the complainer to learn and be fluent in a second language.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 16, 2006 6:33 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


That's interesting.

My mother was first generation living in a Polish community. Polish was her fist language, she learned English in school. My father was from Poland, arriving in the US at the age of 40. (Does that makes me 1.5th generation?)

I think I've noticed a pattern of first and second generations, in that they tend to marry immigrants or first generation people, even if they are from other cultures. Perhaps the commonality is the experience of straddling cultures in the US. My one cousin married a Mexican from Mexico, another married a first generation Italian, one married a German from Germany (who came over in their teens) etc. I found the University experience of being in a mix of cultures to be awesome. And Toronto being so cosmopolitan is one of the reaons why it is my favorite city of all (as well as being clean, humane and non-violent). If I went to Vancouver I'd probably feel the same way.

I relate to that thing about smiling and looking attentive. My grandmother (a wonderful grandmother to all her grandchildren) was convinced I knew enough Polish to follow along.


edited to add:
Where I work the main non-Enligh languages are Mandarin and Tagalog. I can understand why people would want to speak in their first language with each other - they know it better, can express themselves more completely, and it's just easier. But the workplace culture has evolved over the last 15 years or so that it's considered rude to speak 'your' language in front of English speakers (though it is still done sometimes).

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Oops! Clown Justin Trudeau accidently "Sieg Heils!" a Nazi inside Canadian parliament
Mon, November 25, 2024 01:24 - 4 posts
Stupid voters enable broken government
Mon, November 25, 2024 01:04 - 130 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Mon, November 25, 2024 00:09 - 7499 posts
The predictions thread
Mon, November 25, 2024 00:02 - 1190 posts
Netanyahu to Putin: Iran must withdraw from Syria or Israel will ‘defend itself’
Sun, November 24, 2024 23:56 - 16 posts
Putin's Russia
Sun, November 24, 2024 23:51 - 69 posts
The Olive Branch (Or... a proposed Reboot)
Sun, November 24, 2024 23:44 - 4 posts
Musk Announces Plan To Buy MSNBC And Turn It Into A News Network
Sun, November 24, 2024 23:39 - 2 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, November 24, 2024 23:35 - 4763 posts
Punishing Russia With Sanctions
Sun, November 24, 2024 18:05 - 565 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sun, November 24, 2024 18:01 - 953 posts
Elections; 2024
Sun, November 24, 2024 16:24 - 4799 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL