REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

PirateNews and Child Porn

POSTED BY: HERO
UPDATED: Thursday, December 7, 2006 06:42
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 30931
PAGE 3 of 4

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 7:46 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


You know, I hate to be PirateNews-ish but I am wondering about the GOP now.

Rush Limbaugh, caught with a bunch of non-prescription Viagra after a trip to (noted child prostitution destination) Dominican Republic. Abramoff and DeLay protecting (noted child prostitution destination) Mariana Islands.

Does the GOP have a thing for child prostitutes, or are they just general bottom-feeders, congregating wherever misery is at its worst?

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:28 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
To kind of sum up, I'm happy that Hero actually cited something accurately. This is a step in the right direction, in my opinion. It's a far cry from using Drudge or the latest GOP talking points as a source. So, kudos Hero. Remember, the truth will set you free. I'm sad that the FBI got dragged into all this. They have better ways to spend their time.


In lawschool they teach student to use the IRAC argument (ISSUE, RULE, ANALYSIS, CONCLUSION). The issue in this case was whether or not PirateNews posted child porn. I then stated the rule (law), my analysis of that rule, and the conclusion, which is what I did about it.

I appreciate that many folk in these parts would not have reported the pictures to anyone. Unlike most, if not all of you I have a legal obligation to report instances of suspected child porn to the proper authorities. That's what I did, I'd do it again.

I feel that it is better for law enforcement to overeact in certain situations then others. Child porn and terrorism are among them. In my view it is better to go to far too quickly and then correct the error, then to take too long or not go far enough and be unable to make up the lost ground. Such is my philosophy of law enforcement. I may joke around a bit about prosecuting liberals for speeding violations... but the truth is there is nothing I take more seriously then my job and nothing I enjoy more then sending the bad guy to jail, political affiliations not withstanding.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:45 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"I appreciate that many folk in these parts would not have reported the pictures to anyone."

I would not have reported PN or Firefly. I would have reported the original site. It being more relevant to child porn than here.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:53 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Quote:

Originally posted by Zero:
The law classifies it as child porn. Pictures of children bound and gagged and in distress meet the legal definition provided by the US Code. Prove me wrong...I dare you.

The proof is here:

The definition requires that to be child porn it must be "graphic or lascivious". (Either one will suffice.) I didn't see a deifnition for "lascivious" but "graphic" means "that a viewer can observe any part of the genitals or pubic area".

(B) For purposes of subsection 8(B “sexually explicit conduct” means —
(ii) graphic or lascivious simulated;
(III) sadistic or masochistic abuse

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 11:26 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hero- If I thought I saw "child porn" I would have reported it.

Soup- I'm surprised at you. "Better safe than sorry?" Sorry about what? Does this mean that we can't post disturbing (but non graphic) pix of real-life child abuse because somebody like Hero "might" think it's child porn?

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 11:38 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


You know, I'm also of the 'better safe than sorry' mindset. When the neighbor wife was very loud one evening I wasn't sure if they were horsing around or if there were problems. So I called the cops. (Having the cops ring your doorbell - what a mood killer. ) Better safe than sorry. But even after it was pointed out to me, nothing about the picture said 'child porn.' I didn't see the sex in it.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:31 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


So... I take it your neighbors were being extra-frisky??? heh heh heh

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 3:00 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Yeah ... one might say that ....
I think the cops calling on them inhibited them somewhat , I haven't heard anything like that since.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 6:08 PM

SOUPCATCHER


Hey Rue,

I missed your posting of the law. That does put a different light on things. Oh well. I can still dream that Hero is making progress .


Hey Hero,

I completely understand that you're operating under different circumstances because you're an officer of the court. And that you have to cast a wider net on what is, or is not, child pornography to be on the safe side. I get that. Just out of curiosity, would you mind speculating about whether you would've done the same things if you weren't a lawyer?


Hey Signym,

I think you conflated mine and Hero's posts. Although I've definitely been going back and forth on this one.

On one hand, I really hate the idea of calling the police (or, in this case, the FBI) about anything. It's just something you didn't do where I grew up. If there was a car accident, sure. But otherwise, no way. So, even though I understand cognitively that it is sometimes necessary to bring in law enforcement, I have this strong gut urge not to.

On the other hand, there are certain areas where I could see taking more of a better safe than sorry approach. Domestic violence. Child abuse. Rape. White supremacists building pipe bombs. People producing child pornography. Stuff like that.

I didn't see the need to bring in the FBI for this case. To me, that wasn't pornography.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 3:51 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
but "graphic" means "that a viewer can observe any part of the genitals or pubic area".


Gee, there's a Federal Judge out in Utah that is this very moment saying that it is well settled law that nudity is not required. Its nice to know that the Judge took the time to visit this site and consider my argument before rendering her judgement...or perhaps she just consulted case law...naw, never happen.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 3:58 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Does this mean that we can't post disturbing (but non graphic) pix of real-life child abuse because somebody like Hero "might" think it's child porn?


I think that if your going to post those pictures, be prepared for someone to think they are child porn. Its like playing with fire or walking on ice...bad things might happen which is why such things are generally avoided.

If you or PN post such pictures, be prepared for the response those pictures should and often do generate. Even pure intentions may not protect you, since intent is not as much of a factor here as in other cases. Its like speeding. Sure, you were just going about your otherwise legitimate business, but if you go too fast and get caught, its not the cop's fault and your intentions don't matter (although, unlike this instance, citations are within officer discretion, reporting suspected child porn is mandatory).

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:05 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
Just out of curiosity, would you mind speculating about whether you would've done the same things if you weren't a lawyer?


I don't know the answer to that. I'd like to say yes, but who knows?

I've also prosecuted several cases recently, a diddler, a weenie wagger (both technical legal terms), a Mom who thought pictures of her kid having sex with grown men was ok, and a 'sex with the hot neighbor' case. So I may be hypersensitive to the topic.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:22 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

I think that if your going to post those pictures, be prepared for someone to think they are child porn. Its like playing with fire or walking on ice...bad things might happen which is why such things are generally avoided.
Hero-I would take action if I thought the pix represented real, ongoing, and preventable child abuse whether or not it was pornography. For example, pix that came to me secretively of a child being beaten- possibly real-life, current, and within the reach of USA law- would definitely warrant action. Or if the picture came to me with the line "give me your credit card number to see more". Let me toss some examples at you for you view on whether or not it's "pornography"

A naked and burned Vietnamese girl running away from her napalmed village.

A traumatized girl screaming into the arms of her mother just after genital mutilation.

A child dying of starvation, with the vultures waiting in the background.

Children working, shackled, to carpet-weaving looms.

Fully-clothed children waiting for clients in a brothel.


Sometimes LIFE is obscene.

As far as the Utah judge... there may have been other things about the pix that raised red flags, such as simulated but fully-clothed sex. Or perhaps the judge is twitchier than most. As the ads always say: Your results may vary.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 6:39 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Zero,
"nudity not required" The definition is 'graphic or lascivious. Must meet the 'lascivious' requirement.

PS You're spending an awful lot of time looking up one case (from Utah) trying to rationalize yourself.
And I too am curious about your reponse to SignyM's list. They are all photos (some Pulitzer prize-winning) that I've seen in magazines and newspapers.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 7:59 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I do not approve child abuse and exploitation or of people profiting from it after the fact. If I thought that's what was happening here I would have done something about it.

But the heartburn that I have w/ Hero is that if we bow to his implied threat then discussion on a whole range of topics (w/ pix to make a point) grinds to a halt. The topic of child exploitation, exploitation, poverty and injustice IN GENERAL are the bread and butter of our discussions in the RWE forum.



---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 8:18 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hey HERO, is this someone you know?
Quote:

HAMILTON, Ohio (AP) -- A city prosecutor was charged with indecency after a security camera caught him walking around naked in a government building after business hours.

Scott Blauvelt, 35, was arrested Monday and charged with two counts of indecency. He was released from jail to await a hearing in the court where he usually works.

A guard monitoring a security camera spotted a nude man -- whom investigators identified as Blauvelt -- in a building that houses county offices the night of October 5, sheriff's Maj. Anthony Dwyer said. The night before, security video had captured Blauvelt naked in another area of the building, where city offices are located, Dwyer said.

Dwyer said investigators don't know why Blauvelt, who was alone, wasn't wearing clothes. He faces a month in jail and a $250 fine if convicted.

Blauvelt's lawyer, Michael Gmoser, said in a statement Tuesday that his client was seriously injured in a 2005 car accident, suffers from mental illness and is on medication for seizures.





---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:14 AM

VINCENOIRROCKNROLLSTAR


why you crazy americans !

shoot the moon ...shoooooot the mooon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:24 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


THIS is obscene!
Quote:

War has wiped out about 655,000 Iraqis or more than 500 people a day since the U.S.-led invasion, a new study reports.



---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:40 AM

VINCENOIRROCKNROLLSTAR


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
THIS is obscene!
Quote:

War has wiped out about 655,000 Iraqis or more than 500 people a day since the U.S.-led invasion, a new study reports.



do you honestly think the american media are gonna tell their public what a fuck up bush and his daddies gang have made of this iraqi ethinic cleanse gone wrong?


---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.



shoot the moon ...shoooooot the mooon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:56 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Hey HERO, is this someone you know?

HAMILTON, Ohio (AP) -- A city prosecutor was charged with indecency after a security camera caught him walking around naked in a government building after business hours.

Scott Blauvelt, 35, was arrested Monday and charged with two counts of indecency. He was released from jail to await a hearing in the court where he usually works.


Sorry, not anywhere near Hamilton and not someone I remember from lawschool...although I mught not recognize him sense we tended to wear clothes to class.

Read the article though and laughed...its ok to laugh at people who break the law, I laugh at them everyday.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:49 AM

FELLOWTRAVELER


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
As far as the Utah judge... there may have been other things about the pix that raised red flags...



They allow photography in Utah? Who knew?

The important thing is we all know Hero will call the feds. No matter the circumstances, that's valuable information. Now, I don't think that makes him a stoolie, as he does work for the man and that's an meaningful distinction in my mind. And I guess we'll find out if its child porn or not if PirateNews gets pinched...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:23 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Hey HERO, is this someone you know?

HAMILTON, Ohio (AP) -- A city prosecutor was charged with indecency after a security camera caught him walking around naked in a government building after business hours.

Scott Blauvelt, 35, was arrested Monday and charged with two counts of indecency. He was released from jail to await a hearing in the court where he usually works.


Ha! Now we know Hero's name. He ratted to the feds in a futile attempt to save his own skin...

My brother defended a case of a prosecutor attacking a nekked hiker during a "citizen's arrest". It seemed the prosecutor likes to tackle nekked men in public. Defendant defended himself by punching the prosecutor repeatedly in the face. The defendant won that case, and was billed $10,000 in champaigne. Note that the Bush Gang, "Dick" Cheney, Bill Clinton Blythe and 3,000 other world dictators do the same thing, walking around nekked at Bohemian Grove homosexual nudist compound. So an Equal Protection under the Constitution defense would apply.

Quote:


Noreen Gosch
The Johnny Gosch Foundation
www.johnnygosch.com
October 11, 2006

To all the viewers of my website... If this were your child wouldn't you want to know why the police and FBI are not investigating? That is a crime upon a crime.

This is a SECOND PHOTO of Johnny ... bound and gagged received recently. We now know that neither the police nor the FBI ever contacted the website owner of www.Jacobstales.com where the first photo of Johnny appeared.

Thank you for all your help. Everyone who has stepped forward in prayer, thought, and deed. I am deeply grateful.



Click johnnygosch.com to view the NEW photo of Bush White House "Correspondent" Jeff Gannon bound and gagged, just like the rest of the Manchurian Media Mafia.



"How can I get the Captain to shoot a cop in the face, and make it right? That extra moment of sadism - that's the thing that says it's okay, buddy, you're not up to spec, you're going down!"
-Joss the Boss, Firefly DVD, censored Episode 1 "Serenity"

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:19 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Does this mean that we can't post disturbing (but non graphic) pix of real-life child abuse because somebody like Hero "might" think it's child porn?


I think that if your going to post those pictures, be prepared for someone to think they are child porn. Its like playing with fire or walking on ice...bad things might happen which is why such things are generally avoided.

If you or PN post such pictures, be prepared for the response those pictures should and often do generate. Even pure intentions may not protect you, since intent is not as much of a factor here as in other cases. Its like speeding. Sure, you were just going about your otherwise legitimate business, but if you go too fast and get caught, its not the cop's fault and your intentions don't matter (although, unlike this instance, citations are within officer discretion, reporting suspected child porn is mandatory).

H



Here's the problem with Hero: he doesn't comprehend THE LAW. He certainly has no concept of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, which his hero Jr Bush claims "is just a GD piece of paper".

The First Amendment allows for redress of grievances against Gangsta Govt. This kidnapping was perped by gangsters in govt, led by the Bush Sr White House (established in 1980). It's never a crime to report a crime, which is why I publish those photos, and why the mother of the victim publishes those photos. Any arrest for "the crime of reporting a crime" is a false arrest, and any such defendant has the legal right to self defense from false arrest, including lawful use of deadly force and justifiable homicide against copsters, and may make citizen's arrests of any criminal (aka "Hero") who files such a frivolous complaint.

In point of fact, "speeding" in never a "crime", since there's no victim, no property damage, no injured party. Nor is it a "breach of the peace", since it's merely normal, safe driving.

Even Uncle Scam admits in official research reports that "speeding" IS SIX TIMES SAFER than driving a "posted speed limit":

Quote:


American Autobahn

by Mark Rask
www.AmericanAutobahn.com

On a 70 mph freeway, the average state trooper of the day did not pull people over until they were over 80, or in some cases, 85 mph. This put the 'speeder' well over that number.

The first major study to be published was 'Accidents on Main Rural Highways Related to Speed, Driver, and Vehicle' by David Soloman in 1964. Analyzing the accident/speed relationship from a substantial body of information collected in eleven states, Soloman's study reveiwed the accident records of almost 10,000 drivers, and included interviews with 290,000 other motorists who used the roads studied in his report. Looking at two- and four-lane, noninterstate highways, the study produced conclusions that:

Accident involvements 'were highest at very low speeds, lowest at about the average speed of all traffic.'

'Drivers of passenger cars having low horsepower had higher involvement rates than drivers of cars having high horsepower.'

"Drivers just above the mean speed had the lowest involvement rate. These findings confirmed the practice of traffic engineers setting speed limits at the 85th-percentile mark."
www.dma.org/%7Eganotedp/85th.htm

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: As seen on History Channel TV at a LEGAL 212mph on a public highway!
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/americanautobahn-com.wmv

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: How Any Idiot Can Beat A RADAR Speeding Ticket
www.archive.org/details/HowAnyIdiotCanBeatARadarSpeedingTicket

AUDIO MP3 DOWNLOAD: Hidden Taperecording of Copsters Torturing US Citizen to Sign a "Voluntary Consent" Contract Form
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/05/9797.php



Every person has a Constitutionally guaranteed right to travel (when "not for hire"), which includes the standard mode of conveyance (driving a car). People always died on horseback and riding in horse buggies, but there was NEVER a "license" for "horse drivers". Hero would arrest Christopher "Superman" Reeves in the hospital, for "driving a horse without a license", "failure to maintain lane control", and "reckless driving by popping wheelies and jumping".


www.myspace.com/badnarik4congress

"Traffic tickets" are frivolous civil lawsuits for CIVIL Breach of Contract, but the Driver License contract is VOID from its inception, due to fraudulent concealment by Gangsta Govt, and "voluntary" signature to the civil contract extorted under duress at gunpoint. That's illegal according to many state and fed laws, including laws against slavery.

Licenses are Communist scams (6th Plank of Commie Manifesto), so Hero is a confessed Communist traitor to USA, which provides probable cause for his immediate arrest, torture to death by waterboarding, rescusitation/repeat, and secret summary execution in Gitmo, no trial allowed.

Winning Answer to Compaint for "Speeding" at 5mph top speed:
http://piratenews.org/state-v-lee-bcgsc-answer-to-complaint.html

Winning trial transcript:
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/blountcounty-gs-transcript-state-v-
lee.pdf

www.DealsGapDragon.com

Prosecutor's phone message admitting defeat by John Lee:
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/04/9543.php


www.pirateNews.org/dealsgapdragon129page2.html
www.FasterThanASpeedingTicket.net

Note that the majority of judges in USA are pro se judges, because they never attended "Law School", never passed a "Bar Exam", and were never "licensed by a supreme court". If fukkin judges don't need licenses to "practice law", and have no fear of arrest for "practicing law without a license", then Equal Protection doctrine under the Constitution means that no person can be arrested for "practicing law without a license", hence no person can be arrested for "driving without a license".

Quote:


"Some of the courtrooms are not even courtrooms: tiny offices or basement rooms without a judge’s bench or jury box. Sometimes the public is not admitted, witnesses are not sworn to tell the truth, and there is no word-for-word record of the proceedings. Nearly three-quarters of the judges are not lawyers, and many — truck drivers, sewer workers or laborers — have scant grasp of the most basic legal principles. Some never got through high school, and at least one went no further than grade school. But serious things happen in these little rooms all over New York State. People have been sent to jail without a guilty plea or a trial, or tossed from their homes without a proper proceeding. In violation of the law, defendants have been refused lawyers, or sentenced to weeks in jail because they cannot pay a fine. Frightened women have been denied protection from abuse. These are New York’s town and village courts, or justice courts, as the 1,250 of them are widely known. In the public imagination, they are quaint holdovers from a bygone era, handling nothing weightier than traffic tickets and small claims. They get a roll of the eyes from lawyers who amuse one another with tales of incompetent small-town justices. A woman in Malone, N.Y., was not amused. A mother of four, she went to court in that North Country village seeking an order of protection against her husband, who the police said had choked her, kicked her in the stomach and threatened to kill her. The justice, Donald R. Roberts, a former state trooper with a high school diploma, not only refused, according to state officials, but later told the court clerk, “Every woman needs a good pounding every now and then.” And several people in the small town of Dannemora were intimidated by their longtime justice, Thomas R. Buckley, a phone-company repairman who cursed at defendants and jailed them without bail or a trial, state disciplinary officials found. Feuding with a neighbor over her dog’s running loose, he threatened to jail her and ordered the dog killed. 'I just follow my own common sense,” Mr. Buckley, in an interview, said of his 13 years on the bench. “And the hell with the law.' The New York Times spent a year examining the life and history of this largely hidden world, a constellation of 1,971 part-time justices, from the suburbs of New York City to the farm towns near Niagara Falls. It is impossible to say just how many of those justices are ill-informed or abusive. Officially a part of the state court system, yet financed by the towns and villages, the justice courts are essentially unsupervised by either. State court officials know little about the justices, and cannot reliably say how many cases they handle or how many are appealed. Even the agency charged with disciplining them, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, is not equipped to fully police their vast numbers. In 2003 alone, justices disciplined by the state included one in Montgomery County who had closed his court to the public and let prosecutors run the proceedings during 20 years in office. Another, in Westchester County, had warned the police not to arrest his political cronies for drunken driving, and asked a Lebanese-American with a parking ticket if she was a terrorist. A third, in Delaware County, had been convicted of having sex with a mentally retarded woman in his care. And it has left its justices with the same powers — more than in many states — even though governors, blue-ribbon commissions and others have been denouncing the courts as outdated and unjust since as far back as 1908, when a justice in Westchester County set up a roadside speed trap, fining drivers for whatever cash they were carrying. Nearly a century later, a 76-year-old Elmira man who contested a speeding ticket in Newfield, outside Ithaca, was jailed without even a warning for three days in 2003 because he called the sheriff’s deputy a liar. 'I thought, this is not America,' said the man, Michael J. Pronti, who spent two years and $8,000 before a state appeals court ruled that he had been improperly jailed. The reason is plain: Many do not know or seem to care what the law is. Justices are not screened for competence, temperament or even reading ability."
-William Glaberson, New York Times, "Broken Bench: In Tiny Courts of NY, Abuses of Law and Power," September 25, 2006
www.nytimes.com/2006/09/25/nyregion/25courts.html?_r=2&ref=nyregion&or
ef=slogin&oref=slogin

http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/piratenewsrss/message/293




"You can't stop the signal! Damn I wish I'd bought a gun when I had the chance, you fukkin public servant!"
-Mr Universe, Pirate TV, murdered by Police State Death Squad

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Pro se judges, pro se cops and pro se defendants in NY Traffic court
Does that seem right to you?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:49 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Well Hero, I noticed that you slunk past my list of "potential child porn". You know what? You've got to give law enforcement SOME credit for knowing the difference between child porn and news photos. Heck, if they can't arrest John Karr and they're not certain if Foley broke a law, do you think PN's pix will raise any eyebrows? The only question that might be raised is about YOU.

So you can go ahead and blow me in to the FBI if your short hairs get frizzled by one of my posts... it's not like it hasn't happened to me before.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:52 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Quote:

Originally posted by FellowTraveler:
The important thing is we all know Hero will call the feds. No matter the circumstances, that's valuable information. Now, I don't think that makes him a stoolie, as he does work for the man and that's an meaningful distinction in my mind. And I guess we'll find out if its child porn or not if PirateNews gets pinched...

What I wish Zero had posted was something more accurate, meaningful, and useful.

AFAIK he delibertately edited the relevant portions of the statute and mis-stated the contents. As many times as I've cited the text, he has failed to address it. If we are going to learn anything useful, it would be nice if he could put aside his ego issues (among his many issues) and give us the straight dope about what is and isn't kiddie porn.

As for snitches, you have to presume they are around. I've always thought there was one person (not Zero) who was and possibly still is a government operative.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:58 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

a 76-year-old Elmira man who contested a speeding ticket in Newfield, outside Ithaca, was jailed without even a warning for three days in 2003 because he called the sheriff’s deputy a liar.
Huh, I have relatives near Ithaca. Heck, I've driven thru that area! I'd better stay out of THOSE courts!

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:58 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

a 76-year-old Elmira man who contested a speeding ticket in Newfield, outside Ithaca, was jailed without even a warning for three days in 2003 because he called the sheriff’s deputy a liar.

Huh, I have relatives near Ithaca. Heck, I've driven thru that area! I'd better stay out of THOSE courts!

Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.



It's that way everywhere, no matter if the judge is a licensed lawyer or not. Even licensed lawyers are arrested and convicted for masturbating in court using peter pumps during trials.
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=801019
75&blogID=158137001


I walked away without a 110mph speed ticket last month, when one of the copsters thought they recognized me as a biker buddy. Good thing I left my helmet on, and just played along. Sneaky copsters were driving a BLACK patrol car (not unmarked undercover), to better hide in the dark. But I was videotaping for a DVD project, so I had to go riding that day. Got the whole discussion on hidden videotape, with the cop driving away without sueing me for alleged breach of civil driver license contract. It was weird, since the cops acted scared of me (I get that a lot), and were glad they didn't have to write a ticket or make an arrest, tho perhaps that was just because they always feel so guilty for robbing people at gunpoint.

It's been 20 years since I last talked my way out of a 110mph ticket in USA, but in Germany, it was legal to drive 130mph for hours nonstop in heavy traffic.

Mainly I just hunker in my bunker, now that USA is in a current Civil War, with roving Death Squads performing 500 summary executions every year during service of process for civil traffic ticket lawsuits. Here in Blount County, cops just perform summary executions of "speeding" bikers, without bothering to make any attempt at a traffic stop, even when they murder cops riding their bikes to work at the jail. Blount County, Knox County and Tennessee legislature named Interstate I-140 for a convicted hit-and-run killer of a biker tourist.
www.dealsgapdragon.com


"You can't stop the signal! Nah nah nah nah!"
-Mr Universe, Pirate TV

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 12, 2006 3:30 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
AFAIK he delibertately edited the relevant portions of the statute and mis-stated the contents.


Not sure how it was edited. I 'cut and pasted' portions of the text rather then simply pasting large sections of legal language that were not relevant to the discussion.

If you can show that the actual law says something different then do it. Quote what I wrote and what the law says side by side and show us. For the record, I got my quotes off Finlaw...I'll doublecheck on Casemaker and Westlaw since those are the two services I normally use. If I find that I was wrong, I'll issue a correction...I doubt your capable of doing the same.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 12, 2006 5:51 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


You left out the requirement that says it MUST be graphic or lascivious to be porn. I quoted the entire section here: Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 16:57, and quoted or referenced that specific portion here Tuesday October 10 2006 - 06:40, here Tuesday October 10 2006 - 10:53, here Wednesday October 11 2006 - 06:39, and here Wednesday October 11 2006 - 14:52.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:17 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hero is just obfuscating.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:13 AM

FELLOWTRAVELER


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
As for snitches, you have to presume they are around. I've always thought there was one person (not Zero) who was and possibly still is a government operative.



Aahh, now I'm intrigued... Well, go on, dish...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:06 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

But the heartburn that I have w/ Hero is that if we bow to his implied threat then discussion on a whole range of topics (w/ pix to make a point) grinds to a halt.


Siggy, that is their *entire* purpose, him and several others (not including their sock puppet horde) - to sidetrack, sandbag and otherwise destroy anything resembling intelligent, reasonable discussion.

Go back and look, you'll find thread after thread they've successfully derailed that way, and far too many for coincidence - they're just an advanced form of troll and should be handled appropriately.

Look how fast this thread totalled any rational discussion of the original topic prior to it ? and when finally cornered, they result in nitpicking to drag the discussion out in hopes that people will get bored and frustrated and ditch it, conveniently disposing of the topic they wanted disposed as well.

And over and over, people here fall for it.

Don't take the bait, right-O ?

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 12, 2006 6:54 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


To understand Foley, Hastert, Gingrinch, Bush, Clinton-Blythe, John Ramsey, and homo pedophile pimp Barney Frank:

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE
Censored by Discovery Channel
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995&q=Conspir
acy



CIA GOP MKULTRA kidnapped call boys Gannon/Gosch tour Bush Sr White House - 70 articles in Washington Times
www.thelawparty.org/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm

"You can't stop the signal! I'll just comeback in the sequel!"
-Mr Universe, Pirate TV

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:53 PM

FELLOWTRAVELER


Alright PirateNews, I watched the video and maybe your not bat-shit crazy...

I would have to agree that there is something real fishy about this whole thing. The problem is the Boner kid is just not credible. He has recanted, then recanted his recant, then recanted that recant, and then recanted that recant, etc, etc, etc... It's a good thing the producers of this video found some people with credentials to speak out, otherwise the story is just not plausible.

It's too late to follow your other links tonight, but I will check out the Washington Times articles (even if it is owned by the Moonies) on that prostitution ring in DC. It is interesting (if true) that only the leaders of the ring and not the johns were investigated and that the johns' names were then sealed. If they were diddling underage boys, why would their crimes be ignored? Perhaps, somebody was being protected.

Maybe there is nothing to it, but maybe there is something. I'm no longer willing to dismiss it out of hand, however, so your making progress. Well, I'm off to make a tinfoil hat...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 13, 2006 1:30 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Alright PirateNews, I watched the video and maybe your not bat-shit crazy...

Oh PN is a bit out-there, cause in my opinion he takes things to extremes, draws conclusions without sufficient evidence, and his presentation leaves much to be desired, but that doesn't mean he's not working from some pretty solid evidence to begin with.

Boner was scared out of his wits, hunted and hounded by both sides, and shortly after DeCamp's book was published, showed up ranting at a hospital, injured and in shock - whereupon they put him in an observation room and conveniently did not observe him one bit till they found him dead, bleeding profusely from the mouth, the next morning.
If I had to guess (and I do, cause there's no autopsy or other info to be had) I would say someone cut out his tongue.

That someone killed him to shut him up adds substantial credibility to his testimony, in my opinion.

There's a whole lot to it, solid facts, case evidence, testimony and arrests.
One fast way to find information is by googling the names of some of the principals of the matter, but as with any information, cross-check and verify before you accept.

I know quite a bit about this matter too, if you want a less melodramatic information source.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 13, 2006 6:29 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Well, I'm kind of waiting here for BigDamnNobody to make his case about my hypocracy. (taps foot, sighs) I'll give it...oh, about a day... after that I figure BDN just officially lost 10 credibility points out of 100. When he gets to zero I'll just ignore him.

BDN, the floor is yours...

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 13, 2006 9:31 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by SignyM:
Well, I'm kind of waiting here for BigDamnNobody to make his case about my hypocracy. (taps foot, sighs) I'll give it...oh, about a day... after that I figure BDN just officially lost 10 credibility points out of 100. When he gets to zero I'll just ignore him.

BDN, the floor is yours...



Because you asked so nicely. The quotes have been lifted chronologically from this thread and each one is followed by what I think it is.

Quote:


Originally posted by SignyM:
So we have someone on-board (Hero) who will defend to the death the right of an adult to "groom" and harass the underaged but who will inform the FBI about posted pix.

Nice.

Hypocritical, but nice.



Straw man.

Quote:


Originally posted by SignyM:
I have NEVER trusted Hero. He horn-dogs after war widows, can barely smother the rage against his ex and her boyfriend, and likes to intimidate people. He's the perfectly noxious combination of fear and bullying. But altho Hero has been exposed as a Alliance mole, I don't intend to pay it any mind.



Ad hominem.

Quote:


Originally posted by SignyM:
Hero- IMHO altho what PN posted was disturbing in my view it was not "obscene". The only emotions it aroused in me was horror and pity. But what you saw in the picture was what you brought to it: an inability to deal with sexual relations from anything other than a position of intimidation. I haven't forgotten about the time you "joked" (yeah, ha ha) about calling in Homeland Security on your ex's new boyfriend and having him rousted at 2 AM. You give breaks to Marines but throw the book at a mentally retarded kid. You use the law for your personal power. This is just another one of those little games that you like to play.

I'm not fooled by your sanctimonious mouthings. You're a pervert in the making, if you aren't already one.



Ad hominem.

Quote:


Originally posted by SignyM:
I don't know what planet you're living on. Hero, as far as I'm concerned you're on some kind of kinky personal power trip, and you abuse your job. I knew someone like you. The DOJ was very interested in him.



Ad hominem.

Quote:


Originally posted by SignyM:
You know, I hate to be PirateNews-ish but I am wondering about the GOP now.

Rush Limbaugh, caught with a bunch of non-prescription Viagra after a trip to (noted child prostitution destination) Dominican Republic. Abramoff and DeLay protecting (noted child prostitution destination) Mariana Islands.

Does the GOP have a thing for child prostitutes, or are they just general bottom-feeders, congregating wherever misery is at its worst?



Topic change.

Quote:


Originally posted by SignyM:
Hey HERO, is this someone you know?
Quote:

HAMILTON, Ohio (AP) -- A city prosecutor was charged with indecency after a security camera caught him walking around naked in a government building after business hours.

Scott Blauvelt, 35, was arrested Monday and charged with two counts of indecency. He was released from jail to await a hearing in the court where he usually works.

A guard monitoring a security camera spotted a nude man -- whom investigators identified as Blauvelt -- in a building that houses county offices the night of October 5, sheriff's Maj. Anthony Dwyer said. The night before, security video had captured Blauvelt naked in another area of the building, where city offices are located, Dwyer said.

Dwyer said investigators don't know why Blauvelt, who was alone, wasn't wearing clothes. He faces a month in jail and a $250 fine if convicted.

Blauvelt's lawyer, Michael Gmoser, said in a statement Tuesday that his client was seriously injured in a 2005 car accident, suffers from mental illness and is on medication for seizures.





Really weird topic change.

Quote:


Originally posted by SignyM:
THIS is obscene!
Quote:

War has wiped out about 655,000 Iraqis or more than 500 people a day since the U.S.-led invasion, a new study reports.




Mild topic change.

I'm not saying I'm squeaky clean myself, far from it. Which is why I would never call anyone out for doing something which I too am guilty of.

Posting to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 13, 2006 4:08 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Ahhh ... end of the day, end of the week ... You know, I actually went through your long list point by point, and then I realized that you had taken every single post out of context. It was especially egregious when those posts were a DIRECT response to a previous post.
Quote:

So we have someone on-board (Hero) who will defend to the death the right of an adult to "groom" ......
was a direct and relevant response to Zero's posts on another thread.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=18&t=24469
Quote:

I have NEVER trusted Hero. ...
was in DIRECT response to the posting immediately above
MISBEHAVEN
I don't trust Hero now, and I never will after this.
Quote:

Hero- IMHO altho what PN posted was disturbing in my view it was not "obscene". ...
Was in DIRECT reply to the ad hominem attack Zero posted immediately above
ZERO
So for you child porn is ok. But our political differences are the real evil. Thats why you liberals are so dangerous.

Quote:

You know, I hate to be PirateNews-ish but ...
Was responding to changes in topic introduced here => Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 12:47, here => Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 14:04, here => Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 14:10, here => Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 14:11, here => Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 14:16, here => Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 11:19, here => Sunday, October 08, 2006 - 11:31, here => Monday, October 09, 2006 - 09:27, ...

Oh crap. I'm not even halfway through the thread. This is taking too long.

Meanwhile, I brought up the statute with the definition of child porn FIVE times, looking for clarity. You see, the photo does not appear to meet the standard. But Zero slunk away from a substantive discussion.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 13, 2006 6:04 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:


FELLOWTRAVELER

Alright PirateNews, I watched the video and maybe your not bat-shit crazy...


I never waste my time discussing topics without researching them first. Life's too short.

Google "The Franklin Coverup", by GOP CIA Senator John deCamp who won 2 million-dollar lawsuits for himself and Paul Bonnaci, and helped arrest and convict GOP "National Anthem" singer and pedophile pimp Larry King for $40-million bank robbery. Better yet, buy the book from amazon.com. Then READ it, STUDY it, LEARN from it, as if your family's lives depended on it.

DeCamp is now lecturing that when Bush sr raped these little boys, "they were never seen again", implying Bush sr murdered them, or had them murdered, to shut them up.

Just like Bush Jr did this week to a 9/11 Truth webmaster on South Park on prime-time TV:


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8339201394200451031&hl=en
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/southpark911short.wmv

"South Park Republicans..." HA!

Then watch Cathy O'Brien's lectures on being raped and tortured by Bush Sr, Cheney and Hillary Clinton, and hunted at gunpoint by Cheney and Bush in The Most Dangerous Game:
www.piratenews.org/video-archive.html

O'Brien and her lobotomized daughter Kelly, tortured by CIA MKULTRA, are Joss' composite characters for River Tam.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKULTRA

If Joss is allowed to continue the Serenity story, I'm sure he'll delve more deeply into MKULTRA's bag of mind-kontrol tricks.

"You can't stop the signal!"
-Mr Universe, Pirate TV

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 14, 2006 6:21 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Hey Rue,

Quote:


Originally posted by rue:
Ahhh ... end of the day, end of the week ... You know, I actually went through your long list point by point, and then I realized that you had taken every single post out of context.



I was unaware that context had anything to do with questionable debate tactics. Any attack on your opponents character is ad hominem. Any misrepresentation of your opponents argument is straw man.

Quote:


It was especially egregious when those posts were a DIRECT response to a previous post.
Quote:

So we have someone on-board (Hero) who will defend to the death the right of an adult to "groom" ......
was a direct and relevant response to Zero's posts on another thread.



So perhaps the response should have been made in the relevant thread.
That doesn't change the fact that it was still a straw man argument. Hero may have been defending the action's of the GOP regarding the Foley scandal but he never defended the right of an adult to commit indecent acts with a minor.

Quote:


Quote:

I have NEVER trusted Hero. ...
was in DIRECT response to the posting immediately above
MISBEHAVEN
I don't trust Hero now, and I never will after this.
Quote:

Hero- IMHO altho what PN posted was disturbing in my view it was not "obscene". ...
Was in DIRECT reply to the ad hominem attack Zero posted immediately above
ZERO
So for you child porn is ok. But our political differences are the real evil. Thats why you liberals are so dangerous.




So ad hominem attacks are okay as long as you invoke the ultimate defense of... He started it? What's wrong with taking the higher road?

Quote:


Quote:

You know, I hate to be PirateNews-ish but ...
Was responding to changes in topic introduced here => Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 12:47, here => Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 14:04, here => Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 14:10, here => Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 14:11, here => Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 14:16, here => Saturday, October 07, 2006 - 11:19, here => Sunday, October 08, 2006 - 11:31, here => Monday, October 09, 2006 - 09:27, ...



Hey, topic changes are fine in my book, it seems like every thread goes through multiple. That's why I would never post my dislike of topic changes in another thread. Is it not reasonable to expect a Poster to live up to their own lofty ideals. Especially after lamenting the lack of those same ideals in other Posters.

Quote:


Oh crap. I'm not even halfway through the thread. This is taking too long.



That was a nice attempt Rue, and I'm sure SignyM is very appreciative of your efforts.

Posting to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 16, 2006 5:38 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


BDN- My dsl has been acting like dialup and this is a LOOOONG thread. Got time for only one point, I'll get to the rest later:

My comments on Hero's character. Not ad hominem, in fact it is directly related to the discussion at hand. WHY would Hero contact (or threaten to contact) the FBI over a picture that was clearly not child porn? My comments speak to motive, Your Honor... always an important part of a crime.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 16, 2006 7:41 AM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
WHY would Hero contact (or threaten to contact) the FBI over a picture that was clearly not child porn?

A warning to conspiracy theorists everywhere: just because someone is evil and acts out of evil intent, doesn't mean that their actions are coordinated or make sense even to themselves. Evil is nothing if not opportunistic.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 16, 2006 9:33 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


BDN: Point by point-

You claimed this was straw man:
Quote:

So we have someone on-board (Hero) who will defend to the death the right of an adult to "groom" and harass the underaged but who will inform the FBI about posted pix.
Just to pick up a few examples of Hero's vigorous (and underhanded) defense of Foley, hereare two outright lies that he tossed in
Quote:

(1) And lets not forget a certain Democratic congressman who was given a standing ovation on the House floor by Pelosi and her Democrats after being censured for having sex with a 17 year-old page.
(2) Now the FBI is saying that the e-mails and IMs provided by the liberal interest group were edited for content.



YOu said these were ad hominem:
Quote:

I have NEVER trusted Hero. He horn-dogs after war widows, can barely smother the rage against his ex and her boyfriend, and likes to intimidate people. He's the perfectly noxious combination of fear and bullying. But altho Hero has been exposed as a Alliance mole, I don't intend to pay it any mind.

Hero- IMHO altho what PN posted was disturbing in my view it was not "obscene". The only emotions it aroused in me was horror and pity. But what you saw in the picture was what you brought to it: an inability to deal with sexual relations from anything other than a position of intimidation. I haven't forgotten about the time you "joked" (yeah, ha ha) about calling in Homeland Security on your ex's new boyfriend and having him rousted at 2 AM. You give breaks to Marines but throw the book at a mentally retarded kid. You use the law for your personal power. This is just another one of those little games that you like to play.

I don't know what planet you're living on. Hero, as far as I'm concerned you're on some kind of kinky personal power trip, and you abuse your job. I knew someone like you. The DOJ was very interested in him.

As I said, it speaks to motive.

As far as the topic changes are concerned... If you re-read what I posted, I don't have a problem with topic changes per se, just with topic changes that people toss in to avoid conceding a point. You know, you get to the point of a conundrum and the next response is "Mmmm boy howdy! Lookit that weather!" If anyone was conceding anything it was Hero. In Turns out there may be another side after all www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=18&t=24469 Hero stopped responding after he was called in his big fat obvious lies. In THIS thread you may have noticed that Hero simply refused to respond to the examples I provided of "child porn or not?" as well as to Rue's extensive - and more honest- quote of the law.

The crickets were chirping, the trees were sighing in the breeze, the stars were sparkling in the night sky... I was filling in the empty spots where Hero's replies should have been. I would have been extremely happy if Hero had actually addressed either point, but he kind of slunk away.

The only hand-grenade that I tossed in was about the GOP, which was uncalled for.
---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 17, 2006 6:12 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Hey asswipe (It's a good name, and it fits more than one person here)

Ironically, Zero STARTED with this ad hominem attack with these first words of the entire thread:
"In a recent thread PirateNews, well known for his crazy talk, driving while intoxicated, and tinfoil hats.."

As to what is the point of discussion, when two posters are discussing another poster (as in discussion ABOUT Zero between posters) any opinion is relevant to THAT discussion, and not an ad hominem attack.

IF they were attacking Zero as part of their discussion of HIS topic, then it would be.

You may not have noticed. but there were several legitimate discussions going on in this thread. Your attempt to somehow limit the discussion to YOUR preferred topics and invalidate any other freely entered discussion is revolting. And arrogant. And trollish. And says a whole lot about who you are.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 17, 2006 7:53 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:


Originally posted by rue:
Ironically, Zero STARTED with this ad hominem attack with these first words of the entire thread:
"In a recent thread PirateNews, well known for his crazy talk, driving while intoxicated, and tinfoil hats.."



Why you keep bringing up Hero in this discussion is beyond me. Several posters on occasion engage in questionable debate tactics in this forum. OTOH, those same posters are not posting in another thread about their distaste for such practices. Kind of like the difference between a Reaver and an Operative. One consistantly attacks head-on (you know what your going to get) while the other sidles up sideways with a smile. Either way you still end up dead.

Quote:


As to what is the point of discussion, when two posters are discussing another poster (as in discussion ABOUT Zero between posters) any opinion is relevant to THAT discussion, and not an ad hominem attack.

IF they were attacking Zero as part of their discussion of HIS topic, then it would be.



So in your opinion it was not an ad hominem attack, it was flame baiting. SignyM made no such mention about distaste of flame baiting in her original post so in this case no hypocricy exists and I must apologize.

Quote:


You may not have noticed. but there were several legitimate discussions going on in this thread. Your attempt to somehow limit the discussion to YOUR preferred topics and invalidate any other freely entered discussion is revolting. And arrogant. And trollish. And says a whole lot about who you are.



Now it is YOU employing the straw man. It was SignyM and to a lesser extent YOU who wanted to limit the discussion in this thread to the present topic. I called SignyM on something and was more than willing to back up my claim of hypocricy when invited.

Posting to stir stuff up.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 17, 2006 8:18 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Ironically, Zero STARTED with this ad hominem attack with these first words of the entire thread:
"In a recent thread PirateNews, well known for his crazy talk, driving while intoxicated, and tinfoil hats.."



Yeah, I said it. Oh yes I did (shakes finger at screen).

Do you all remember the 'PirateNews must go' thread or the long discussion he and I had about whether or not DUI laws conflict with the 'Gangsta Govment's' Constitution? And read PN's posts and tell me the descriptive term 'crazy talk' doesn't apply...its a legal term, I used it in court to describe similar rantings by a self-styled Freeman objecting to the State's oppressive requirement that people have licenses to drive.

I admit the tinfoil hat comment was unsupported by precedent or evidence. I apologize. Although I doubt he can hear my apology through the tinfoil pj's he wears to bed or the plastic wrap and duct tape he covers his computer with to block our tracking signals.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 17, 2006 8:53 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

You may not have noticed. but there were several legitimate discussions going on in this thread. Your attempt to somehow limit the discussion to YOUR preferred topics and invalidate any other freely entered discussion is revolting. And arrogant. And trollish. And says a whole lot about who you are.- Rue

Now it is YOU employing the straw man. It was SignyM and to a lesser extent YOU who wanted to limit the discussion in this thread to the present topic. I called SignyM on something and was more than willing to back up my claim of hypocricy when invited.-BDN

And I was more than happy to reply. However, you're ignoring both my original post AND my reply. What I originally said was
Quote:

I DO, however, care HOW they debate. Misrepresenting what someone else has said, straw-man arguments, ad hominem... and the thing that drive me craziest: changing the topic to avoid conceding a point
. These threads follow a line of conversation like an ox pissing ... in other words, pretty much all over the map. Many topic changes are plain shift in interest. But many topic changes are introduced simply to avoid issues, conclusions, or concessions.

I'm more than happy to pursue "what is child porn, did the posted picture meet that definition, should law enforcement be notified?" with Hero.. that WAS the point of his post... but he's not willing to discuss this with me. He'd MUCH rather talk about PN!

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:16 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

You may not have noticed. but there were several legitimate discussions going on in this thread. Your attempt to somehow limit the discussion to YOUR preferred topics and invalidate any other freely entered discussion is revolting. And arrogant. And trollish. And says a whole lot about who you are.

Golly gee whiz, what took ya so long ?

Again, you all are playing their game, going back and forth, tit for tat, letting them drag down and dismantle anything that looks like reasonable discussion instead of typical rightwing radio show shouted blather, intended on overcoming facts and logic with volume.

They ARE Trolls, and it's time to admit this fact instead of trying to reason with them and thus allowing them to bait you into this crap - they don't debate, they don't discuss, they PRETEND to do these things while working towards the destruction of the topic because they do not like the realities behind it.

As these 3-4 trolls and their myriad of sockpuppets have been allowed free run, less and less people come here and/or participate in the discussions, and thread after thread after thread winds up, well.... just like this.

And that pisses me off, it means they're winning, and have damned near totally crushed anything even remotely resembling reasonable discussion around here - your average thread here sees maybe, MAYBE 12 of us post to it, and often it's more like five or six because these goons and their tactics have done run off everybody else.

Fucking ignore them, don't play their game, and in extremis, if needs be, we'll have a little chat with Haken about it - or play their game, and watch this forum shrink until there's nothing left but you.... and them.


-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:13 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Frem -that's why I tend to hound posters with the same question over and over until I get a real answer.... or until they bail out of the thread. I think it's incumbent on folks who want to discuss issues to be aware that the best way to deal with trollishness is not to engage in the same behavior. Stick with clean rhetoric. Respond to the other person's point, and keep ON topic.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:43 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


I don't believe ignoring lies is wholesome, but this seems like something good to do.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
White Woman Gets Murdered, Race Baiters Most Affected
Thu, November 28, 2024 07:40 - 20 posts
Alex Jones makes himself look an even bigger Dickhead than Piers Morgan on live TV (and that takes some doing, I can tell you).
Thu, November 28, 2024 07:29 - 81 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, November 28, 2024 07:11 - 7514 posts
Hollywood exposes themselves as the phony whores they are
Thu, November 28, 2024 07:02 - 46 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, November 28, 2024 06:03 - 4846 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, November 28, 2024 05:58 - 4776 posts
Trump, convicted of 34 felonies
Thu, November 28, 2024 03:56 - 44 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Thu, November 28, 2024 03:51 - 48 posts
Where Will The American Exodus Go?
Thu, November 28, 2024 03:25 - 1 posts
What's wrong with conspiracy theories
Wed, November 27, 2024 17:06 - 21 posts
Ellen Page is a Dude Now
Wed, November 27, 2024 17:05 - 238 posts
Bald F*ck MAGICALLY "Fixes" Del Rio Migrant Invasion... By Releasing All Of Them Into The U.S.
Wed, November 27, 2024 17:03 - 41 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL