REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Atheism?

POSTED BY: YINYANG
UPDATED: Monday, October 14, 2024 06:48
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3907
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, February 6, 2007 4:23 PM

YINYANG

You were busy trying to get yourself lit on fire. It happens.


Transcript from here (near the bottom): http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0701/31/pzn.01.html

You can watch the videos, too:





Quote:

HUNTER: They don't have a good - marketing. If they had hallmark cards, maybe they wouldn't feel so left out. We have Christmas cards. We have Kwanza cards now. Maybe they need to get some atheist cards and get that whole ball rolling so more people can get involved with what they're doing. I think they need to shut up and let people do what they do. No, I think they need to shut up about it.

SMITH: I don't think they need to shut up. The reason why I don't think they need to shut up is because there's a whole bunch of people in this world that we can look at and say they need to shut up and they certainly don't. You got everybody fighting for their own individual cause. This is their cause. We might not like it. I don't agree with it at all, but they do have a right.

HUNTER: I think they need to shut up about crying wolf all the time and saying that they're being imposed upon. I personally think that they should never have taken prayer out of schools. I would rather there be some morality in schools. But they did that because an atheist went to court and said their child -- don't pray (INAUDIBLE).

SCHLUSSEL: And what about this obnoxious Michael Newdow, who went all the way to the Supreme Court for his child, the child doesn't know what's going on, to try and get under God taken out of the pledge of allegiance. They are on the attack. It's obnoxious and they do need to shut up.

SMITH: They are going on the attack, but the reality, again, is everybody has their own cause. The fact is there's a whole bunch of people in America who need to shut up and they don't. So why should these people be any less. We live in a nation. We're supposed to be tolerant. We're supposed to be accepting of other people's viewpoints, even when they are not our own and the fact is, if they're an atheist, that's their right. They're not going to change my belief in God (INAUDIBLE).

ZAHN: What I find so interesting is when you look at the statistics, that they were the most hated of all the minorities, gays (INAUDIBLE).

SMITH: I'm not even willing to believe that. That's news to me. I heard that, I read that, I just don't believe it.

HUNTER: You can't pick an atheist out of a crowd.

ZAHN: Can you explain to me where you feel the assault? When 97 percent of the folks in this country claim to worship some kind of God, the 1 to 3 percent of this population that doesn't believe in God, who are they hurting?

HUNTER: Eight to 12 percent. (INAUDIBLE) They're not hurting anyone. I personally don't have a problem with an atheist. Believe or don't believe what you want. Don't impose upon my right to want to have prayer in schools, to want to say the pledge of allegiance, to want to honor my God. Don't infringe upon that right.

SMITH: When they want to take - when they want to take God out of the pledge of allegiance or whatever, this is what I'm saying. They're saying, OK, that's Christian. What if you're a Muslim? What if you're someone of a different belief?

SCHLUSSEL: This is a Christian country.

SMITH: I understand that, but what they're saying is how can -- if we're inclusionary, why can't we include all that and we're not. That's my point.

SCHLUSSEL: (INAUDIBLE) Look where there are more atheists and where they've lost God, where the church is not that strong. Europe is becoming Islamist. It's fast falling and intolerance is increasing. That's the one reason our country has not become like Europe because we have strong Christians and because atheists are not strong. And I think that's a good thing.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, February 6, 2007 8:09 PM

HKCAVALIER


God help us? Is The View the new acme of television commentary? Get a few obnoxious people together and listen to them bicker and cut each other off? Who are these people? Hey, I've got a great idea, let's listen to how much b.s. people have clogging their minds!



HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, February 6, 2007 8:54 PM

ANTIMASON


those women are crazy. when we're talking about God and government, and the whole seperation of church and state, we should try to look at it objectively and form a consenses about what, if any religion, government DOES endorse(in the event that the 'seperation' is infringed upon). i would be willing to make the case that very few instances refer to the christian God(yhwy), but to the gods() of masonry(which 33rd degree Mason albert PIke will tell you is Lucifer). actually, washington DC, and numerous other sites around the US all share these same masonic, esoteric undertones.. so its a wonder to me why these examples are never brought up(although i think i know- its that people generally dont recognize the meaning of the symbolism)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, February 7, 2007 1:41 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


HK: hahahahaha!!


As a non-beliver myself, I find this kind of intolerance morbid and creepifying.

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, February 7, 2007 4:19 AM

CHARLIETHEBLOODY


scary stuff

--------------------------------------
"I'm an artist, with an e and a beret."





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, February 7, 2007 4:42 AM

KHYRON


The ESPN analyst made the most sense. What does that tell you?



The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, February 7, 2007 6:00 AM

MALBADINLATIN


I agree that The View is babbling idiotic dribble most of the time, but this transcript is actualy from Paula Zahn Now, not The View.

Apologies if you all knew that.

Anywho...tolerance demands that we let athiests be atheists and christians be christians and so on...it shouldn't bother an atheist if they mention "god" in anything.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, February 7, 2007 6:29 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

SCHLUSSEL: This is a Christian country.


Well, there's your problem right there.


"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, February 7, 2007 8:36 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by yinyang:
SCHLUSSEL: (INAUDIBLE) Look where there are more atheists and where they've lost God, where the church is not that strong. Europe is becoming Islamist. It's fast falling and intolerance is increasing. That's the one reason our country has not become like Europe because we have strong Christians and because atheists are not strong. And I think that's a good thing.

Or in other words "I've never been to Europe and I've never met an Atheist except when me and my fellow fundementalists were organising a mob to kill one of them".



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:06 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

SCHLUSSEL: This is a Christian country.


Well, there's your problem right there.


"Keep the Shiny side up"



That certainly is the problem , right there. No, it ain't a Christian nation. Never was. I thought that one had been so thoroughly debunked that no one would use it anywhere anymore.
Anything that person says after that point is tainted with absolute non-factuality.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:19 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

"But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."

-Thomas Jefferson

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:35 AM

ANTIMASON


Quote:

newoldbrowncoat-

That certainly is the problem , right there. No, it ain't a Christian nation. Never was. I thought that one had been so thoroughly debunked that no one would use it anywhere anymore.
Anything that person says after that point is tainted with absolute non-factuality.



i have to somewhat disagree with that.. christianity may not be the national religion of the US< but it was, for the first few centuries the dominant belief held among the AMerican populace- so in that respect America is/was a relatively 'christian' nation. if we're talking about our founding, i think there is a good case to be made that there was from the start an actual conflict between christianity and luciferian illuminism, which share many of the same archetypes, while not idealogically compatible. we may not be specifically christian in origin, but there is NO DOUBT that there is a fundemental religious element among Americas foundations... though this influence is not particulary christian(but masonic)

and Citizen- can you not tell by this board alone that atheism is perfectly well represented in the US? that in mind, i cant recall any time 'believers' got together and murdered an atheist .. which sounds to me like a pretty indifferent, stereotypical comment on your part. the comment about atheists not being "strong" i dont agree with either.. but then my intentions are not divisiviness

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 8, 2007 7:29 AM

SAHARA


Quote:

Originally posted by yinyang:
SCHLUSSEL: (INAUDIBLE) Look where there are more atheists and where they've lost God, where the church is not that strong. Europe is becoming Islamist. It's fast falling and intolerance is increasing. That's the one reason our country has not become like Europe because we have strong Christians and because atheists are not strong. And I think that's a good thing.



So what are they trying to say, if we don't wipe out those nasty atheists, we'll be overrun by Islamists? That if we're not all Xians, we'll fall and become *more* intolerant? I'm so confused.

Sahara
Blackbird fly into the light of the dark, black night.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 8, 2007 7:36 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
and Citizen- can you not tell by this board alone that atheism is perfectly well represented in the US? that in mind, i cant recall any time 'believers' got together and murdered an atheist .. which sounds to me like a pretty indifferent, stereotypical comment on your part. the comment about atheists not being "strong" i dont agree with either.. but then my intentions are not divisiviness

I was talking about the person who made the comment. I could have just said "They don't know what they're talking about" or more sarcastically "Well they certainly know where the bears shit in the woods". But that would have been rather droll.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 8, 2007 9:33 AM

ANTIMASON


then i apologize.. i seem to get a little defensive about the subject anymore.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 8, 2007 9:42 AM

ANTIMASON


Quote:

Originally posted by sahara:

So what are they trying to say, if we don't wipe out those nasty atheists, we'll be overrun by Islamists? That if we're not all Xians, we'll fall and become *more* intolerant? I'm so confused.



what is interesting to me is that, while taking the side of christians, they ignore the prophecy from the book which is the foundation of their beliefs. for one it says that at the end of the age, true believers will be persecuted, by a church of apostacy, and by the world and its system of the beast. the true followers of God, no matter what personal belief now, will be the people excluded from the world; not on top. besides that, Islam is not the horn of the beast, it just isnt.. it will be a western nation(already under the control of a luciferian society). a lot of christians are being decieved though by end times myths like the rapture and so on..

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 9, 2007 3:25 PM

YINYANG

You were busy trying to get yourself lit on fire. It happens.


Apparently, Richard Dawkins is going to (or has alread) had an interview with Paula Zahn. The program, however, will not be aired until Monday, due to the death of Anna Nicole Smith.

It's almost funny...

Edit: Oh, and here's this:

Quote:

Something happened over the last 24 hours. Beginning last night, my inbox became populated with vile hate-mail from atheists. No skin off my back.

But it is entertaining and amusing. It's hard to believe their letters because they were all attacking me for my appearance on CNN's "Paula Zahn Now," a week ago, but coincidentally each letter claims the sender just watched me on CNN. First of all, the video of that segment appears nowhere on the net. Believe me, if it did, I'd link to it. Secondly, since I appeared on the show a week ago, that all these "seminar" e-mailers are now all e-mailing me the same basic hate message, populated with a diversity of obscene insults, it's easier to believe that they were easily brainwashed into sending me the missives as a result of an atheist blog that just put up an attack on me, yesterday.

I'm surprised these atheists would be so obedient to a higher power that told them to e-mail me since, after all, the one thing they're supposed to have in common is a lack of belief in a higher power. Well, no-one ever said atheists are consistent or immune from hypocrisy.

I don't mind receiving the atheist hate mail, since I know that in a few years, many of these same people will either be Muslim extremists (redundant) or helping the country fall further in its fight against the creep of Islamic imposition on America . . . or both.

Look at famous atheists and what happened to them. Adam Gadahn a/k/a Azzam Al-Amriki--now a top Al-Qaeda video "personality"--was raised by his hippie Jewish father and equally bizarre gentile mother as an atheist. And look how he turned out. Ditto for hippie-spawn John Walker Lindh.

Those two people are enemies of America, and many of those who think like them are of equally weak mind. If you don't believe in anything, you'll easily fall for virtual nothings. That's why Europe is so quickly turning Islamist--because atheism dominates and Christianity is rapidly dying there. Over there, the number one cause for which atheists are suddenly finding "god" is Islam.

Over here, as I pointed out on CNN, atheists are on the attack against religion and G-d only when Christians and Jews are involved, not when Muslims and Islam are. A Christian prayer at a public school graduation or football game? Send in the ACLU lawyers. A Muslim prayer at a high school football game in Dearbornistan? Suddenly, when the "Religion of Peace" is involved, atheists boast extreme tolerance and display ultimate deference. No lawsuits. Ever. And the Muslim prayers continue.

So to you hate-filled atheists a/k/a future Muslim extremists (redundant), your e-mails have no effect on me. Ditto for your creative obscenities which don't impress upon me the civility of the atheo-fascisti set.

But thanks for the material for this post. And nice try, telling me you saw me on CNN, last night. That was a week ago. Last night, was when Sean Hannity deliberately plagiarized my work on Islamic imam Husham Al-Husainy on FOX News. Different network, different show, my name clearly not mentioned (just my work ripped off by Hannity; Thanks, Sean).



http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/02/when_atheists_a.html

I got it all, but the link is just for reference's sake. And, by the way, this is the blonde woman from the panel.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 9, 2007 5:09 PM

HKCAVALIER


I don't get it. Schlussel's own grandparents were Holocaust survivors. Surely she's aware of the many jews who became atheist after WWII. Are they all walking down the slippery slope to radical Islamism, as well?

And her absurd conspiracy theory about why she got the hate-mail is almost funny. Another wretched human being I didn't need to know existed. Thanks, Yinyang.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 9, 2007 5:44 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


These women are idiots. They're no different than Oprah or Jerry or any of the other daytime talkshow people who have been poisoning the minds of people for years and laughing all the way to the bank.

I don't understand what the big deal about saying God in the pledge of allegiance is. Why can't any kid say whatever they want to there. There should be a big old blank spot in the pledge for somebody to say God, Allah, Buddah, eight-armed-elephant-god, Tony the Tiger, Pikachu, Michael Jordan or nothing at all.

.....that wouldn't go along with public school's top priority which is blanket conformity at all costs.

I think anyone should be able to pray whenever they want to. No reason that should offend anyone either. Now if I was an atheist and somebody was saying a prayer about me, wheather it was to save me or put a curse on me, I would be pretty pissed off, and well within my right to complain. My grandma prays that I find God all the time and she tells me so. I let her slide though cause she's my Grandma

As far as the masonry goes Antimason, I'm a firm believer in what you have to say, but that's just a tad off the main topic here, not a commonly shared belief, and I've been taking quite a lot of abuse on the boards recently, so I'm not really in the mood to go there now.

Good quote again Frem.

Sahara, my Grandpa would have been yelling right now. Nothing pisses off an oldschool Christian like using X in place of Christ. Some will even go as far as to say that this is masonic and the X represents the devil (X-Mas).... Suprised Antimason didn't mention it. Just a suggestion... if you really want to come off as a tolerant atheist who isn't really trying to get under religious peoples skins, you may want to refrain from using the X.... or not. That's freedom, ain't it?

"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 10, 2007 10:18 AM

YINYANG

You were busy trying to get yourself lit on fire. It happens.


Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
can you not tell by this board alone that atheism is perfectly well represented in the US?



Really? Or is it just well-represented on these boards in part because of the way religion in Firefly is portrayed, and because Joss is an atheist?

Me, I'm "surrounded" by believers. Heck, I once was a believer! So, to claim that atheism is well-represented in the U.S. strikes me as baloney. We may represent ourselves well (for the most part), but there really aren’t many of us in comparison to Christians or other theists.

Not that I mind religious people in general. I can understand wanting to believe that there is a purpose for existence, and that there is something after death. I can understand wanting to have "the Big Guy" on your side. I can also understand if a person's been raised to be religious and wishes to remain so. It’s when they try to legislate their beliefs, or interfere with people’s daily lives, that I take offense.

Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
These women are idiots. They're no different than Oprah or Jerry or any of the other daytime talkshow people who have been poisoning the minds of people for years and laughing all the way to the bank.



Normally I'd agree with you - but because this is on a major news outlet, these women carry somewhat more authority than talk show hosts.

Quote:

I don't understand what the big deal about saying God in the pledge of allegiance is. Why can't any kid say whatever they want to there. There should be a big old blank spot in the pledge for somebody to say God, Allah, Buddah, eight-armed-elephant-god, Tony the Tiger, Pikachu, Michael Jordan or nothing at all.

.....that wouldn't go along with public school's top priority which is blanket conformity at all costs.



And here I thought public school's top priority was to rake in money (or, in a few places, to actually educate). Although blanket conformity certainly would make it easier for teachers to teach, and for the boards of education to get the numbers they want, I don't think the intent of things like uniforms is necessarily malicious. It's not good, either, but the main concern of parents and teachers should be that the public school system is being run like a business, or a training ground for future factory workers.

Quote:

I think anyone should be able to pray whenever they want to. No reason that should offend anyone either.


That's fair, and normally it wouldn't offend me, either (if they want to waste energy trying to "save" my soul, it's not like I can stop them). But, the kind of prayer in public schools I think the woman was talking about was prayer that accompanies the Pledge of Allegiance (which I think is a silly thing; pledging loyalty to fabric rather than actually demonstrating any real allegiance to the country itself - but of course you could argue that it's because I don't care for patriotism, which has its own topic). Needless to say, me no likee.

Quote:

Just a suggestion... if you really want to come off as a tolerant atheist who isn't really trying to get under religious peoples skins, you may want to refrain from using the X.... or not. That's freedom, ain't it?


Doesn't saying Xtian have more syllables in it than Christian, anyway? Of course, most people don't say Xtian, but... it's only an extra four letters anyway. Guess that's just another abbreviation that I don't understand.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 10, 2007 11:34 AM

SEVENPERCENT


Quote:

Originally posted by yinyang:

And here I thought public school's top priority was to rake in money (or, in a few places, to actually educate). Although blanket conformity certainly would make it easier for teachers to teach, and for the boards of education to get the numbers they want, I don't think the intent of things like uniforms is necessarily malicious. It's not good, either, but the main concern of parents and teachers should be that the public school system is being run like a business, or a training ground for future factory workers.




Now see, as a teacher, this just pisses me off. I love people who attack the public school system and don't know a damn thing about it, or what it means to teach.

For starters, a public school's top priority is to make sure that all children are citizens capable of making informed decisions when they get out into the real world. I'm sorry that this costs money, but if you want a nation of (even more than we already are) easily swayed, mindless drones, by all means don't pay your taxes.

Second, uniforms aren't something designed to cramp little Joey's style. It's to keep kids from beating the shit out of each other over their shoes, and to prevent kids from displaying gang colors in the halls and starting fights. Uniforms also help self-conscious poorer kids look the same as even the richer kids, which can help them achieve. Test scores in schools with uniforms are greatly improved over schools without.

Third, I'm not training my students to be mindless drones, as your "factory worker" comment seems to imply. I tell all my students that one day I want to see them graduate from an ivy-league school and go on to be leaders of this country. Just because I teach in a public school doesn't mean I want kids to be slaves of the system. I'm trying to free their minds, not trap them.

Finally, while I'm sure I could take the time to come up with some pithy remark to crack back at your attack on my profession, I'll let a smiley do it for me.

------------------------------------------
"A revolution without dancing is no revolution at all." - V

Anyone wanting to continue a discussion off board is welcome to email me - check bio for details.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 10, 2007 11:37 AM

SEVENPERCENT


And sorry for the threadjack above.

And for all the people bitching about the 'X' in Xtian? Lighten up, Francis, it's just shorthand. No one is taking the Christ out of Christianity; the X isn't crossing Christ out, it's what it stands for.

[Edited to add:]The X is the letter from the Greek that Christianity/Christ/Christian starts with.
From Wiki:
X or Xt used as a contraction for "Christ" ("X" resembles the Greek letter Χ (Chi), the first letter of "Christ" in Greek (Χριστός [Christos]).

------------------------------------------
"A revolution without dancing is no revolution at all." - V

Anyone wanting to continue a discussion off board is welcome to email me - check bio for details.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 10, 2007 11:44 AM

YINYANG

You were busy trying to get yourself lit on fire. It happens.


(Note to self: be more specific.)

Okay. I should probably make myself more clear, then.

I think teachers are amazing people. To work in a job that most seem to take for granted with sub-standard pay is admirable. You're not only responsible for their education, but for their safety and security. And working with children at any age is difficult enough, in and of itself.

So, when I say "public schools," I mean school boards, superintendents, and the general bureaucracy that seems to surround teachers and prevent them from doing their jobs well (or as well as they could).

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 10, 2007 1:54 PM

SEVENPERCENT


Well then, Yinyang, allow me to retract my initial smiley and replace it with this one:



------------------------------------------
"A revolution without dancing is no revolution at all." - V

Anyone wanting to continue a discussion off board is welcome to email me - check bio for details.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 10, 2007 9:06 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

I don't understand what the big deal about saying God in the pledge of allegiance is.

A very big deal, actually.

Original Pledge of Allegience, Sept 8th 1892.
Written by Francis Bellamy.
"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

1923 variation.
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

1954 Red Scare/McCarthy variation.
(Yep, ole "Tailgunner Joe" AGAIN.)
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

It's worth noting that mister Bellamys' estate, in the person of his daughter, objected rather passionately to this alteration.

I refused to utter this monstrosity back in second grade, in the late 1970's - which caused a brief stir and involved the local newspapers, my mother fully supported me in this.

It wasn't the "Under God" that did it, as much as the "Liberty and Justice for All" part that set me off against it, a child knows what hypocrisy is before they can spell it, and on top of that it struck nerves in me that I could not explain then but now know are a knee-jerk reaction to anything smacking of Fascism.

That's not to say that the "Under God" part didn't rook me too, especially once I found out the manner of it's inclusion, which resulted in a wonderfully profane and blistering exchange with my much put-upon history teacher, who was stuck teaching "officially sanctioned" history and getting hammered every day by encylopedia britannica in the person of yours truly.


And Seven, imma hafta call BS on you, I've been through that system, I have fought tooth and nail within and without against the manner in which it destroys anything remotely resembling original thought, creativity or critical thinking.. no matter what you believe, the end result is exactly as expressed by Jack.

It would be one thing for the school to work with the students to create a uniform worn by students as a badge of school pride, with their input and suggestions, but that is NOT how it is done.

They are shoved down the kids throats as a gesture of their inferiority, forced upon them to show them their place as mere property (as the law regards them as such, let's be honest here) until they come of age, and to erase all differences so that such need not be explained, explored and/or understood.

Prisoners wear uniforms too, for the same reason most students do, and believe me when I say that I personally have attended more than one school who's administrators ran it like one, in fact one of the admins WAS an ex-warden, to our knowledge and we never, ever let her forget we knew it.

And for those who still buck the tide there's the outright tsunami of ritalin to bury them under medical coercion, and if that doesn't work an "evaluation" gauranteed to find "something wrong" with them so that they can be sent somewhere else... so the creative mind, the individual person, that which made this country great, has in great part been crushed right out of it and cast aside on the scraphead of so-called progress, and no amount of overloading those kids with work till they have nervous breakdowns is gonna fix a scheme that teaches obedience rather than critical thinking, oh hell no.

Very, VERY touchy issue with me, having been forcibly ejected from schools for being a critical thinker, for asking questions and for not being a nice, obedient pet animal, but rather a person who demanded the same basic respect as a human being that was being given.

And now watching my niece go through an upgraded and worse rendition of the very selfsame events because she doesn't meekly obey, because she is intelligent, curious, and creative and yet rather than rewarded by this, is actively harrassed and punished for it by the system, fills me with a blinding red rage that anyone would dare call our current system educational... well, that it may be, but what values do you think my niece is learning when she now sees adults and society as enemies ?

Sure, you get a shining example here and there who's an actual teacher, and benefit of the doubt to you on that respect, Seven, cause I've also had more than one of those... but don't expect someone who has seen and fully investigated, and tried to change, that system to not see it for what it has become.

No offense to you personally, I know it's gotta suck to try to be a real, true teacher in a system that wants nothing of the sort, but I calls em as I see em.

That bein said, kudos to Ms. Dorsey and Ms. Chaffinch, good teachers are the truest of heros because by their very existance they create more.

Oh, and we resolved the Pledge issue simply, in the end when they couldn't expel me for my refusal due to local support, I simply sat quietly and let everyone else do as they pleased without comment or interference.

That's Freedom, ain't it ?

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 10, 2007 9:44 PM

FLETCH2


I wore a school uniform and was ok with it, in fact I would go as far as to say it was a good thing. You had no idea of another kids personal circumstances by the way they dressed, if you wanted to know someone you had to talk to them to find out their story, the contents were not being advertised on the "packaging."

Besides fashion is far more regimented than we like to imagine. Kids don't have a genuine "youth culture" they have a set of "looks" that are packaged and sold to them as product. If you are a Goth you dress a certain way, if you like Hip Hop you dress another. It's prepack. When everyone dresses the same the only way to show you are different is to be different. We were all very strange (but we're English so being strange is expected .)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 10, 2007 10:57 PM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
...but we're English so being strange is expected.

If one is an Englishman, one isn't strange, one is eccentric.



The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 11, 2007 6:53 AM

FREMDFIRMA


ROFLMAO.
*wiping coffee off the monitor*

oh my oh my... just imagining that in a proper british accent KILLS me...

bwahahahaha

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 11, 2007 7:52 AM

FLETCH2


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
...but we're English so being strange is expected.

If one is an Englishman, one isn't strange, one is eccentric.



The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.



You're only allowed to be eccentric once you've mastered strange. We all get a basic education in strange, those that chose to pursue that to a higher level become eccentric. Trust me on this I have A levels in eccentric.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 11, 2007 7:52 AM

FLETCH2


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
...but we're English so being strange is expected.

If one is an Englishman, one isn't strange, one is eccentric.



The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.



You're only allowed to be eccentric once you've mastered strange. We all get a basic education in strange, those that chose to pursue that to a higher level become eccentric. Trust me on this I have A levels in eccentric.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 11, 2007 8:21 AM

SEVENPERCENT


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
And Seven, imma hafta call BS on you,


Fine, then don't be surprised when I do it right back, because I'm about to.

Quote:

It would be one thing for the school to work with the students to create a uniform worn by students as a badge of school pride, with their input and suggestions, but that is NOT how it is done.

Of course it isn't done like that. Would you like to know why? Because you can't make everyone happy, that's why. One group wants it this way, one group wants it that way, the 51% majority that sets the rule pisses off the 49% that didn't, then parents get involved or the students that lost spend time running around trying to get petitions signed. And, really, what is there to work with? What kind of 'design' do you really need to have? Khakis and shirts that match the school colors. End of story, everyone matches.


Quote:

They are shoved down the kids throats as a gesture of their inferiority, {edit...} and to erase all differences so that such need not be explained, explored and/or understood.

Yes, because we should just let the kids run around thinking they are on an equal power level with the faculty and staff. No one wants them to be inferior, but we do want them to respect authority. Do you get a say in how you should dress at work? Unless you're your own, do you get to tell the GM of your company exactly what way you think it should be run, and that you won't work if he doesn't do it your way? That's what you're advocating.

Quote:

And for those who still buck the tide there's the outright tsunami of ritalin to bury them under medical coercion, {edited...} fix a scheme that teaches obedience rather than critical thinking, oh hell no.

What's up, Piratenews. I think ADD is a crutch, so do most teachers, and ritalin is a joke. You know who forces that down our throats? Parents, that's who. Little James doesn't do well in school because mommy never taught him to behave, and they run right out to the doctor and get ritalin so he can have an excuse. DO NOT EVER pin that shit on teachers, that's an outside issue. I can't think of the last time I EVER heard a teacher say, I think your kid needs ritalin so he can be a mindless drone. You're pinning that tain on the wrong donkey.

Quote:

Very, VERY touchy issue with me, having been forcibly ejected from schools for being a critical thinker, for asking questions and for not being a nice, obedient pet animal, but rather a person who demanded the same basic respect as a human being that was being given.

And now watching my niece go through an upgraded and worse rendition of the very selfsame events because she doesn't meekly obey, because she is intelligent, curious, and creative and yet rather than rewarded by this, is actively harrassed and punished for it by the system, fills me with a blinding red rage that anyone would dare call our current system educational... well, that it may be, but what values do you think my niece is learning when she now sees adults and society as enemies ?


And here's where I call BS. You know what this post smacks of? You didn't like a certain class, and didn't want to pay attention, and you pin it on the system. I see this every day.

Let me show everyone how this plays out:
I teach English. Little Frem wants to sit in my class and draw, or sit in my class and do Sudoku when he should be following along. I say something, or write him up, or make him put it away. Suddenly I'm 'stifling the curiosity' of the gifted. Little Frem should be allowed to learn what he wants, when he wants, and if he's a math genius, then I'm in the way of his learning and am turning him into an automaton. Is that about right? Because that's what it sounds like to me. Trust me, I've heard that same thing from a hundred parents, and that's the way the story always goes. "You should respect the fact that my kid wants to be a musician/athlete/math whiz and let him work on that stuff in your class." No, I teach English, and little Frem should be focused on my class. And then, when he fails because he didn't pay attention (because his folks never made him), I'm told he's been diagnosed with ADD, given ritalin, and I should pass him anyway (and on top of it, I've killed his desire for music/art/athletics).

Quote:

Sure, you get a shining example here and there who's an actual teacher, and benefit of the doubt to you on that respect, Seven, cause I've also had more than one of those... but don't expect someone who has seen and fully investigated, and tried to change, that system to not see it for what it has become.


You should be grateful to all your teachers. Yes, some shouldn't be teaching anymore, some are phoning it in. But there's not a single teacher out there that didn't start teaching without the desire to help kids learn and grow as people. And if they took less shit from parents and the gov't, there'd be fewer that were burned out.

Yes, the bureaucracy sucks ass, and I wish some things were different. But when you can come up with a way to get all children rich and poor the chance to learn in such a way as to advance the gifted, bring up the needy, and try and make decent citizens, send it out to the gov't or to all teachers, because they (and we) don't know how to do it.


------------------------------------------
"A revolution without dancing is no revolution at all." - V

Anyone wanting to continue a discussion off board is welcome to email me - check bio for details.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 11, 2007 2:25 PM

FREMDFIRMA


I warned you, Touchy subject, now i'm going to eat you alive.
No offense...

Firstoff, respect is EARNED, not taken, and especially not taken at the expense of folks you are demanding respect from, and the method therof matters a whole damned lot.

Sure, you can beat a dog down so hard it "Respects" you by cringing in your presence, but as soon as that dog sees a chance, you'll have teethmarks, and that is *exactly* what's happening in our school systems today.

You EARN Respect by example, not by crushing anything that isn't absolute subservience - and of course the forgotten issue that children are PEOPLE, human beings, not pets, not property (although legally they are that) and not animals, they are human beings and deserve to be likewise treated with respect, you have to give some to get some, and they are given NONE.
Quote:

do you get to tell the GM of your company exactly what way you think it should be run

I told him to fire the racist and the alcoholic, hell yes, just because they are not adults, kids are incapable of offering useful input and suggestions ?

Mind you, our school had a fiasco over this issue, a ludicrously draconian dress code we felt needed to be discussed on it's merits and the student government could, and did take issue with it.

Schools response, dissolve the student government, gee what a message THAT sent about our (token) involvement, and yes we resorted to less than nice means till it was finally reinstated and the common sense points were addressed.

And before you dare start calling tinfoil hattery maybe you should go back and check your facts, the company that produces Ritalin was pounded pretty hard on more or less manufacturing (or at the very least altering the diagnostic criteria of existing phenom) this issue to create a larger market for their product, and was sued for it, and a large collective of the plaintiffs were parents who damned well felt the schools were "pushing" this on them, and repeated cases of threats over it regarding social services if compliance wasn't given.

I know ALL too well because my sister has been the target of some of those threats despite the fact that there's not one bit "wrong" with any of her kids - and even if there were, you mean to tell me a Pediatrician can detect a behavioral disorder in a mere 10 minute office visit ?

Bunk!

Minimum of 90 minutes of observation combined with an accurate (i.e. not provided by a school with ulterior motive!) case and familial history, which is certainly not the case in the handout "diagnosis" most of these kids receive.

Don't you DARE blame the parents when those parents have repeatedly been on the receiving end of threats and social services investigation for failing to comply with the school system's demand to ritalinize them.

And many of the symptoms they call ADD have a different root cause as you'll see shortly when I post *another* editorial written about the same time as "Return of the Fear" regarding this situation - I've DONE my homework on this one kiddo, don't try to play me for a fool.

And you dare to lie to me and say teachers don't suggest it to admins who then pressure those parents ?
What PLANET are you on ?
You are sitting here telling me to disbelieve the evidence of my own eyes and my own sisters experience with the MD State School Board over nearly 20 years ? I do not think so.

And dare you mock ?

Little Frem had to do much of his own education OUTSIDE of school because in at least one case (that being the aforementioned history class) the information being taught was at the very best, slanted and in more than one case outright falsehood - and yet in the very finest irony resistance to that shoveljob resulted in an extremely good and accurate grasp of history, via means other than the school system.

Little Frem's *issues* with the school were it's blind eye to a certain collective of "somebodys sons" terrorising the rest of the school populace with impunity, an extraordinary hostile education environment and a complete lack of respect or even common damned decency amongst the staff.

A 1978 NEA Report flat stated this behavior amongst the public school system would result in further, potentially lethal violence and was ignored, and if folks can't find a copy I will link them one.

You wanna try me for a dunce, then ? go ahead and try, I pointed out the teachers who struggled with this system, whom I respected and learned from, being a teacher means more than teaching one simple subject, and yet a bad impression can leave a distaste for that entire subject on a child that lasts for years and years.

I paid attention, you bet, I paid TOO MUCH attention for their liking, the end result of which was a walkout followed by a 95.6% on the GED when I was sixteen and could finally escape their clutches for good.

You wanna throw insults cause I struck a nerve, go right ahead, but make sure of your target before you let the barbs fly.

As for gratitude, what gratitude should I have for the system that taught me hate and fear, taught me how and when to lie, taught me that other people are the enemy, that being openminded was a weakness, tolerance a foolishness, and most of all, that being popular and coming from the "right" family was way more important than being intelligent or creative...

My Gratitude is entirely reserved for the teachers that answered questions instead of punishing them, that taught not only a subject, but taught people to think, to question, and to learn.

But for "The System"... nothing.

My current *issue* rests upon one single fact that grates my nerves in this.

WE CAN DO BETTER.
And we should, and we don't - that bothers me a lot, when I have to look in the eyes of my niece and try to explain why they tell her she's a bad person because she asks questions instead of meek obedience.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 11, 2007 2:27 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Original Editorial, as promised, publication circa spring-summer 2001.

A Deadly Quick-Fix

(Authors Note - Please keep in mind that most of this research this article is based upon is the work of others, most of them better equipped, trained and financed to do so than the author, and while such information is cross checked to the best of the authors ability, that should never replace one's own methods of verifying information.)

Let me give you an example to chew on - if your child had a cough, would you simply give him cough medicine ? - without seeing a doctor ?

What if that cough never got any better ? - would you, then keep your child on cough medicine all his life, without so much as trying to find out what the underlying problem is....without the advice of a physician ?

I sincerely hope the response to that is "No !, that's crazy !".

Or is it ?

That is, in fact - the exact pattern of the use of Psychotropic drugs on children in our school system, Ritalin being most common among them.

A 1998 Article by the Detroit News called the rapidly increasing use of Ritalin in our school system "Alarming" - and to those who do even a little investigation into the matter, it is even more so.

There is no doubt that ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder) and related disorders exist, nor is there any doubt that some children can benefit from the use of proper medication to combat such disorders, that is well established fact in the medical community.

But the sheer scope of increase in it's use relative to the public school system is, quite frankly, preposterous, according to many physicians.

In order to understand why this is, one has to understand at least a little about how a persons brain functions...and how it responds to it's environment.

Doctor Bruce D. Perry, of the ChildTrauma Academy has done phenomenal research into this area, and has done wonders into breaking it down into terms that parents, caregivers and educators can understand, and much of it points to a fact that turns the whole situation on it's head.

A Frightened Mind Can Not Learn

When a child does not feel "safe", if the child's environment is not secure and stable (to the child's perception, not yours.) - the brain will react according to it's natural priorities, and foremost among them is self preservation.

In a fear/anxiety situation, the brains response is simple, calling back on the same instincts that kept the caveman alive, heart rate and respiration increases, the glands dump a chemical flood into the system, and the mind-body reflexes prepare to react in age old manner, this is called the Fight/Flight/Freeze reflex.

During this process, the abstract and cognitive portions of the brain either lie dormant, or get drowned out by the amount of other activity going on up there.

The best case example would be this, you are driving, on the highway, while discussing politics with a friend in the passenger seat....your car hits a small patch of ice, sending it into a spin, and you desperately try to recover from it without wrecking the car.

Are you, at that point, *capable* , of maintaining the conversation about politics ? is your friend ?

No, because that portion of your brain is "kicked on the back burner" in a manner of speaking, while the immediate priority of self-preservation is addressed.

There are various degrees of this state, of course, with the above example being one of the more extreme, however, a person who is even at a low level of fear/anxiety has difficulty concentrating, using abstract thought, and many of the processes needed for "Learning".

How does this relate, you ask ?

Simple - if a child in a classroom is at a Fear/Anxiety state, learning will be much more difficult for them....they will fidget, be distracted easily, inattentive - every single symptom we attribute to ADD and related disorders.

Why would a child be in such a state while attending a public school ?

My question would be, why wouldn't they ?

Not so very long ago, children with difficulties at home used to enjoy school, because it was to them a safe and secure environment, with nice, predictable schedule and little, if any, threats or surprises.

Look at the school system now - less recess, longer classes, more classes, more pressure, more students, less teachers, higher requirements, more homework, less funding, more violence, more coverage of that violence, in ways both good and bad, too much coverage of that violence no matter how you look at it, and a significantly higher level of stress than any child should ever have to face.

The first report on these problems that I know of was a 1978 study by the National Institute of Education, and was a much unheeded call that things were going wrong that needed attention - as far as known and obvious by public policy, this report was largely ignored.

In July 1999, the FBI's NCAVC held a symposium on school shootings and threat assessment. The symposium included 160 educators, school administrators, mental health professionals, teachers and administrators from each of the schools included in the study, NCAVC staff members, law enforcement officers and the prosecutors involved in investigating each of the shootings. Also in attendance were experts in disciplines including adolescent violence, mental health, suicide, school and family dynamics.

They also released their findings and recommended threat management and intervention process via public release on Sept 6th 2000...a significantly more logical and effective one than the current process used by most schools at this time.

Again, the warnings that something was seriously wrong went unheeded.

Violence begets fear, which begets yet more violence, and we've let this cycle continue largely unchecked for over twenty years, till it's reached a critical mass that can no longer be ignored or unheeded - and that has been addressed in previous articles.

However - it is that very atmosphere of fear, in our public schools, that creates a "hostile environment", which our children react to, and more specifically, their minds react to by kicking into that above-mentioned Fear/Anxiety state.

And what do we do about it ?

Instead of treating the underlying problem of the hostile environment our schools have become, we simply take the symptoms and make excuses for them...maybe it's ADD, maybe it's a Learning Disability...let's just medicate it till it goes away - the quick fix.

Our society doesn't help in this situation very much, being far more dependant on instant gratification and reaction "band-aids" instead of actual problem solving, and as for the medical community ? shocking.

Most health plans push hard for medication instead of treatment simply because medication is cheaper, both financially and in doctors time and effort - the average pediatrician sees a child for an average of only 7-1/2 minutes, and proper diagnoses of behavioral disorder takes, on average, at least 90 Minutes.

Treating one is very time consuming and expensive, often $150 or more for a single session.

Of course, many times it is the school itself, without any medical training, trying to perform a "diagnoses" and demand treatment - two cases of such an event will be included at the end of this article.

As if that were not enough....why not follow the dollar, why not ask "who's benefitting from all this?" - It's a good question.

The company that makes the most common of these drugs, Ritalin is currently under litigation due to accusations that they - "planned, conspired, and colluded to create, develop and promote the diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in a highly successful effort to increase the market for its product Ritalin."

And no overworked teacher is going to complain about 40 kids who just sit there and stare like little zombies, nor is any school administrator going to complain about the lack of disciplinary problems due to medicating them out of existence, now, are they ?

What is really frightening is that many of these kids are on medication that is "off-label", a medical term for the use of medication that has not been properly tested and/or approved for use on children, and many are on more than one....for example, many kids on Ritalin who have developed problems sleeping are now given Clonidine as well - where does it stop ? what affects are these untested pharmacological regimens going to have in the long run....do we really need to medicate, and then medicate symptoms caused by the original medication ?

It seems the only one's getting the short end of this stick are the kids, and involved parents.

What we seem to be doing here, is medicating our children's natural responses to an environment we have by inaction allowed to become hostile, instead of working to make that environment safe, secure and comfortable to them.

After a long period of time with such chemical support, more often than not discontinued at the end of the school year, many of these kids turn to other methods of "chemical support" most definitely not approved by the FDA, especially older ones.....psychological/chemical dependance kicks in, and they reach for another, even more dangerous chemical "Crutch" to help them through the day.

Oh, didn't you know ? Ritalin and Thorazine are two *highly* addictive substances, so when that first pill gets dropped, even with all the other issues, the child now has to eventually kick that monkey off his back, too - on top of everything else.

"What's the matter with kids these days ?" - we've made them into little zombie-junkies, that's what's the matter with them...and you really, honestly think they will not hate us for it ?

Get a clue, fix the problem, not the symptoms - go with your kid to school tomorrow and discuss this with the administrator, and if they don't listen, do what you have to - it's your kid, not theirs, after all.

Me...I recommend home schooling or tutoring, I would not suffer any child I know through public schools at this time...and they have a long way to go before I would.

The choice is yours.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Note: These were originally included and may be outdated.
Related links:

Articles about Ritalin Use relative to the school system:
http://www.salon.com/health/log/2000/02/23/kid_drugs/
http://www.vachss.com/help_text/archive/cinc_post1.html
http://detnews.com/1998/metrox/ritalin/1alarm/1alarm.htm

Lawsuit Information:
http://www.breggin.com/classaction.html
http://www.ritalinfraud.com/

Students "Ordered" to take Ritalin:
http://add.about.com/health/add/library/weekly/aa081700a.htm
http://add.about.com/health/add/library/weekly/aa011300a.htm

Findings of an in-patient setting study concerned about overmedication:
http://www.cqc.state.ny.us/pubmedch.htm

Severe Case Example of a child's response to a "hostile" environment:
http://www.childprotectionreform.org/policy/trends/massnewstory5.htm

Summary of the 1978 NIE Study:
http://www.nssc1.org/studies/studies/nie.htm

FBI press release and downloadable PDF:
http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel00/school.htm
You must have the Acrobat reader installed to read the PDF file. If you do not, click here to get the free download.

*Highly* recommended link:
CITIVAS Child Trauma Academy
http://www.childtrauma.org/

(Extra credit - without the wonderful work done by Dr Perry and his staff, and his explanations of child responses to fear/anxiety - this article would not have been possible.)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 3:41 AM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
You're only allowed to be eccentric once you've mastered strange. We all get a basic education in strange, those that chose to pursue that to a higher level become eccentric. Trust me on this I have A levels in eccentric.

I wasn't able to take Eccentricity at A levels, so I tried to teach myself by using English Eccentricity for Dummies. It wasn't quite what I expected though, because after a brief introduction to the orbital eccentricities of planets, it went on to describe, in detail, the bicycle manufacturing industry in Southampton during the 1920s.

Not surprisingly, the author was English.



The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 5:11 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Good history lessons, Frem.

As I understand it, problems over separation of church and state didn't exist back at the beginning, where the state wasn't so extensive. If schools weren't run by the state, we would have no problems with prayer in schools or a pledge of allegiance to anything.

We're trying to keep an essential principle afloat after the state has grown into the intrusive monstrosity that it is. It doesn't work. We try to fix the problem by focusing on the "separation" issue, when we should be focusing on the "state" issue. The only way to truly separate church and state is to keep the state limited to Constitutionally mandated functions like government, courts, military, police, etc.

And it is gross and disgusting to me that after seeing cases of overt discrimination in the segment, those commentators would defend that discrimination.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky

--------------
Nullius in verba. (Take nobody's word.)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 8:21 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by SevenPercent:
Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
And Seven, imma hafta call BS on you,


Fine, then don't be surprised when I do it right back, because I'm about to.

Quote:

It would be one thing for the school to work with the students to create a uniform worn by students as a badge of school pride, with their input and suggestions, but that is NOT how it is done.

Of course it isn't done like that. Would you like to know why? Because you can't make everyone happy, that's why. One group wants it this way, one group wants it that way, the 51% majority that sets the rule pisses off the 49% that didn't, then parents get involved or the students that lost spend time running around trying to get petitions signed. And, really, what is there to work with? What kind of 'design' do you really need to have? Khakis and shirts that match the school colors. End of story, everyone matches.


Quote:

They are shoved down the kids throats as a gesture of their inferiority, {edit...} and to erase all differences so that such need not be explained, explored and/or understood.

Yes, because we should just let the kids run around thinking they are on an equal power level with the faculty and staff. No one wants them to be inferior, but we do want them to respect authority. Do you get a say in how you should dress at work? Unless you're your own, do you get to tell the GM of your company exactly what way you think it should be run, and that you won't work if he doesn't do it your way? That's what you're advocating.

Quote:

And for those who still buck the tide there's the outright tsunami of ritalin to bury them under medical coercion, {edited...} fix a scheme that teaches obedience rather than critical thinking, oh hell no.

What's up, Piratenews. I think ADD is a crutch, so do most teachers, and ritalin is a joke. You know who forces that down our throats? Parents, that's who. Little James doesn't do well in school because mommy never taught him to behave, and they run right out to the doctor and get ritalin so he can have an excuse. DO NOT EVER pin that shit on teachers, that's an outside issue. I can't think of the last time I EVER heard a teacher say, I think your kid needs ritalin so he can be a mindless drone. You're pinning that tain on the wrong donkey.

Quote:

Very, VERY touchy issue with me, having been forcibly ejected from schools for being a critical thinker, for asking questions and for not being a nice, obedient pet animal, but rather a person who demanded the same basic respect as a human being that was being given.

And now watching my niece go through an upgraded and worse rendition of the very selfsame events because she doesn't meekly obey, because she is intelligent, curious, and creative and yet rather than rewarded by this, is actively harrassed and punished for it by the system, fills me with a blinding red rage that anyone would dare call our current system educational... well, that it may be, but what values do you think my niece is learning when she now sees adults and society as enemies ?


And here's where I call BS. You know what this post smacks of? You didn't like a certain class, and didn't want to pay attention, and you pin it on the system. I see this every day.

Let me show everyone how this plays out:
I teach English. Little Frem wants to sit in my class and draw, or sit in my class and do Sudoku when he should be following along. I say something, or write him up, or make him put it away. Suddenly I'm 'stifling the curiosity' of the gifted. Little Frem should be allowed to learn what he wants, when he wants, and if he's a math genius, then I'm in the way of his learning and am turning him into an automaton. Is that about right? Because that's what it sounds like to me. Trust me, I've heard that same thing from a hundred parents, and that's the way the story always goes. "You should respect the fact that my kid wants to be a musician/athlete/math whiz and let him work on that stuff in your class." No, I teach English, and little Frem should be focused on my class. And then, when he fails because he didn't pay attention (because his folks never made him), I'm told he's been diagnosed with ADD, given ritalin, and I should pass him anyway (and on top of it, I've killed his desire for music/art/athletics).

Quote:

Sure, you get a shining example here and there who's an actual teacher, and benefit of the doubt to you on that respect, Seven, cause I've also had more than one of those... but don't expect someone who has seen and fully investigated, and tried to change, that system to not see it for what it has become.


You should be grateful to all your teachers. Yes, some shouldn't be teaching anymore, some are phoning it in. But there's not a single teacher out there that didn't start teaching without the desire to help kids learn and grow as people. And if they took less shit from parents and the gov't, there'd be fewer that were burned out.

Yes, the bureaucracy sucks ass, and I wish some things were different. But when you can come up with a way to get all children rich and poor the chance to learn in such a way as to advance the gifted, bring up the needy, and try and make decent citizens, send it out to the gov't or to all teachers, because they (and we) don't know how to do it.


------------------------------------------
"A revolution without dancing is no revolution at all." - V

Anyone wanting to continue a discussion off board is welcome to email me - check bio for details.



With you all the way on this one, Seven.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 9:13 AM

FLETCH2


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
[ it went on to describe, in detail, the bicycle manufacturing industry in Southampton during the 1920s.

Not surprisingly, the author was English.





Now there's an excellent subject. My personal favorite is the Wilson-Purbright "Superior" of 1926. First practical application of a fully automatic transmission to a standard bicycle. Who knows what other great innovations Horace Wilson would have given the cycling public where it not for his tragic death in a freak crocodile juggling accident.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 9:38 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
Now there's an excellent subject. My personal favorite is the Wilson-Purbright "Superior" of 1926. First practical application of a fully automatic transmission to a standard bicycle. Who knows what other great innovations Horace Wilson would have given the cycling public where it not for his tragic death in a freak crocodile juggling accident.

Anti-Crocodile protective head gear?



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 9:47 AM

FLETCH2


That would have been a good one, yes.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 10:17 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
You're only allowed to be eccentric once you've mastered strange. We all get a basic education in strange, those that chose to pursue that to a higher level become eccentric. Trust me on this I have A levels in eccentric.

I wasn't able to take Eccentricity at A levels, so I tried to teach myself by using English Eccentricity for Dummies. It wasn't quite what I expected though, because after a brief introduction to the orbital eccentricities of planets, it went on to describe, in detail, the bicycle manufacturing industry in Southampton during the 1920s.

Not surprisingly, the author was English.




I thought the English Eccentricity was spanking. Gee, I was hopin' for somethin' kinky...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 10:32 AM

FLETCH2


Last time I checked that activity was illegal in England. In theory since assault is a crime prescribed by statute and since you can't give someone permission to break the law, you can't consent to have another person strike you. There was a famous case in the early 1990's that in effect make SM activities illegal in the UK though apparently not sports like boxing where you actually have a chance of killing someone.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 10:43 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
Last time I checked that activity was illegal in England. In theory since assault is a crime prescribed by statute and since you can't give someone permission to break the law, you can't consent to have another person strike you. There was a famous case in the early 1990's that in effect make SM activities illegal in the UK though apparently not sports like boxing where you actually have a chance of killing someone.

Sooo, it's okay for me to hit you as long as hitting you doesn't turn me on?



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 10:54 AM

FLETCH2


I believe the exact legal definition is that it is illegal for any person to hit any other person for any reason, since the laws against GBH and common assault don't require a complainant.

HOWEVER the police have broad authority to ignore that under certain circumstances, such as if the incident were an accident, related to a sporting event or if the proscution of the event would realy on the testimony of an uncooperative witness (like most domestic disputes.)

In the case in question the police chose to prosecute all participants at a gay S&M meeting under statute.

So yes, in practice, you only get proscuted if the other party likes being hit.

Go Fig.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 12, 2007 4:39 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important



Seven and Frem,

There is a problem with all of your arguing about teachers and students and parents and schools and ritalin.

You are both quite correct.

There are places where Frem's view of the school system is utterly correct. Where schools 'suggest' ritalin and crush creativity and teach sanitized crap and all that jazz.

And there are places where parents use ritalin and ADD disorders to excuse their kids misbehavior and they nail teachers to 'allow creative expression' to protect their kids' goofing off, and where violence and disorder have become so rampant that conformity is a much needed skill and safety net.

And sometimes these places exist in the same state, or town, or even school.

The school system experience is a varied one, and just about every complaint at both ends of the spectrum is true for someone.

I remember my own school experience, and I am now witnessing the experience of my son. I can tell you that you are both completely correct, and it literally does turn 180 degrees from one classroom to the next. Any argument about the merits and flaws of our schools is doomed in that it addresses millions of people with general statements, when in fact we are dealing with millions of individual situations, in all their individual flavor.

We would really need to make every school, every teacher, every student, and every parent a 100% conformist with one way of doing things before we could make sweeping statements about the nature of education in this country.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 30, 2024 1:06 PM

JAYNEZTOWN


Britbongistan finally does something correct?

the tax payer funded BBC claims he was arrested for 'speech'


when it seems to be the fact he was involved with a terror group

banned terror group al-Muhajiroun, has been jailed for life

So what is the plan there is no 'Death Penalty' they won't feed him pork...it will just cost the tax payer and he will convert other criminals in the jail house?

Anjem Choudary


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 14, 2024 6:48 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


as a movement Western Atheism seems to have jumped the shark


Why are Atheists such cowards when it comes to calling out the Koranimal jihadi islamics


Sharia Law Begins to Restrict Women in Swat Valley

https://www.christiantoday.com.au/news/sharia-law-begins-to-restrict-w
omen-in-swat-valley.html

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Sat, December 21, 2024 19:06 - 256 posts
Hollywood exposes themselves as the phony whores they are
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:55 - 69 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:29 - 4989 posts
Music II
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:22 - 135 posts
WMD proliferation the spread of chemical and bio weapons, as of the collapse of Syria
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:15 - 3 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:11 - 6965 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, December 21, 2024 17:58 - 4901 posts
TERRORISM EXPANDS TO GERMANY ... and the USA, Hungary, and Sweden
Sat, December 21, 2024 15:20 - 36 posts
Ellen Page is a Dude Now
Sat, December 21, 2024 15:00 - 242 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, December 21, 2024 14:48 - 978 posts
Who hates Israel?
Sat, December 21, 2024 13:45 - 81 posts
French elections, and France in general
Sat, December 21, 2024 13:43 - 187 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL