Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Mitt Romney: Scumbag.
Thursday, June 28, 2007 3:10 AM
FREMDFIRMA
Thursday, June 28, 2007 6:15 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Thursday, June 28, 2007 6:16 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Thursday, June 28, 2007 6:18 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SignyM: God, these people are worse than corrupt politicians, they're fucking Nazis.
Thursday, June 28, 2007 9:17 AM
Thursday, June 28, 2007 9:29 AM
CHRISISALL
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: The lies and myths of the cruelty of Gitmo have been grossly overexaggerated, as Dick Durbin himself admitted.
Thursday, June 28, 2007 9:33 AM
JONGSSTRAW
Thursday, June 28, 2007 9:40 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: I say fuck 'em as far as Guantanamo prisoners are concerned....they're all a bunch of fucking psychpatic maniacs who want to kill innocent women & children
Quote: and what do you tree-huggers want to do with them if Gitmo closes???
Thursday, June 28, 2007 9:53 AM
Quote:Originally posted by chrisisall: Umm...prison? Manson hasn't escaped has he? You make it like these alleged perps are super-villains or something
Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:02 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SignyM: Cause ANYBODY can be deemed an illegal enemy combatant... even you Auraptor...
Thursday, June 28, 2007 12:14 PM
Thursday, June 28, 2007 1:34 PM
Quote: Cause ANYBODY can be deemed an illegal enemy combatant... even you Auraptor... and stuffed away in Gitmo forever.
Thursday, June 28, 2007 2:16 PM
KANEMAN
Thursday, June 28, 2007 2:19 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Pretty hard to have a discussion when one hops around from Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, and the original article on some drug rehab groups. One problem is, you want to connect all of them, when they're not remotely connected. There were clear abuses in Abu Ghraib, while the stories being told about Gitmo were entirely made up. Body count, Chris ? Last I checked, Gitmo had a total of 3 deaths. All suicides. Guys who had tried to off themselves before, in an attempt to turn the tide of world opinion against the U.S. Gitmo is still open. Abu Ghraib ? Those who were guilty of abuse were punished, and rightfully so. As for the story link listed above, so what ? Sounds like many stories were unsubstantiated, while others weren't. But how's that really connect to Romney being a scumbag? Seems a pretty far reach that Romney could be held accountable for what some fundraisers have been ACCUSED of promoting. "Two of his top fundraisers, however, have long supported using tactics that have been likened to torture for troubled teenagers. " Sorry, but that's heresay, and not fact. There's no evidence either of these 2 guys 'supported' the tactics in any way. This is yellow journalism at its finest.....or worst. It's an op/ed column, not a genuine news article, for starters. Quote: Cause ANYBODY can be deemed an illegal enemy combatant... even you Auraptor... and stuffed away in Gitmo forever. Well, because I'm a US citizen, I doubt I would classify as an 'illegal' enemy combatant. Add to the fact that I'm not combating the U.S., don't own a gun and have no plans of traveling over seas to shoot at U.S. troops any time....EVER. I'm secure in the fact that I'll never see the inside of Gitmo. Even if Hitlary steals the election in '08. People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss " They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
Friday, June 29, 2007 3:16 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: There were clear abuses in Abu Ghraib, while the stories being told about Gitmo were entirely made up.
Quote: Abu Ghraib ? Those who were guilty of abuse were punished, and rightfully so.
Quote: But how's that really connect to Romney being a scumbag?
Quote: I'm secure in the fact that I'll never see the inside of Gitmo.
Friday, June 29, 2007 4:43 AM
Friday, June 29, 2007 4:51 AM
Friday, June 29, 2007 3:45 PM
Quote: You KNOW this eh? I have wittnessed, first and second hand, abuse of power on AMERICAN soil. And it's not quantifiable, officially. For everything you hear of there's an equal amount (at least) that's not heard of.
Quote: Because he supports that which he does not personally wittness or have any substantive knowledge concerning. He demonstrates Bush-like thinking.
Quote: That's a projection, not a fact. However, you're probably correct. Injustice only happens to them anyway. Them usually deserves it. Them is evil. Blacks and whites are security, comfort. Simplicity is...simple.
Friday, June 29, 2007 4:12 PM
Quote: As for Gitmo, if extensive corroborated evidence including photographic records of extreme continuous abuse doesn't convince em, nothing short of a stint in the place themselves would.
Quote:Romney's involved to the degree that he actively supports such actions...
Quote: , as witnessed by his statements in regards to Gitmo,
Quote: and in that these are his closest compadres, if he is ignorant of their connections, then he is incompetent as a politician beyond all reckoning,
Quote: and since they're still part of his staff, and not disavowed, then by default he supports their position as well
Quote: As far as how this pattern of behavior connects, it's simple - these are people born and raised to react a certain way to *ANY* defiance of their will, because that is what they were exposed to, and thus pass down to those under them, a poisonous power structure at many times sparked on by religion although not always... And now we're seeing it in politics, that whole how-dare-you-defy-me bullshit from the top of our current administration, and both the root and the end point are exactly the same.
Quote: Does anybody *really* believe this crazy fuckers would NOT sling protesters into these ad-hoc deathcamps if only they could get away with it ?
Friday, June 29, 2007 5:35 PM
ANTIMASON
Saturday, June 30, 2007 1:10 AM
Quote:Originally posted by antimason: Auraptor- how is Mitt Romney better then Ron Paul? give me a serious analysis do you honostly believe any candidate represents the constitution better then Paul? if so, please detail, because my inspection of the records says otherwise it will be impossible for any of these guys to be fiscal conservatives, because they are not challenging the entitlement machine of washington. if Romney wants to cut spending, how about 2 billion a day in Iraq. since peace is off the table, what does Romney propose to do to minimize the size and scope of (what has become a socialist)government? to me, Romney is so visibly a saleout, who is doing this for his own personal agendas, and to bask in the eminence of 'commander in chief'
Saturday, June 30, 2007 3:22 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: And about these 'abuses of power'. BFD.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL