REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Here Come Dem Taxes....Hold On To Your Wallet!

POSTED BY: JONGSSTRAW
UPDATED: Saturday, September 29, 2007 12:53
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2653
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, September 28, 2007 2:03 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Once again the Democrats are ready to destroy the economy, and take hard-earned money out of your pocket......
Rep. Dingle of Michigan and Ways & Means Dems want to add $ .50 tax hike on gasoline to combat "global warming". Now I ask....what the fuck are they really gonna do with the billions of dollars they're gonna STEAL from all of us?....Next, they want to eliminate the ceiling for Social Security withholding, do away with capital gains tax cuts, etc etc. They now consider any family making $ 90,000 "RICH" and want to raise the tax table rates beyond the previous high of 39%. A year ago they said that 'RICH" meant an income of one million dollars, now they say 90 grand!...at this rate next year if you're polishing cars at at he carwash the Dems will consider you rich, and tax you to the point that you cannot live.

So I say to all you Dems and moderates on the fence...you work hard for your money, right?...Are you really gonna vote for any more Dems who just wanna tax you to death and take your money and GIVE IT AWAY to those that just expect the Govt. to support them?...support them despite the fact that they have made decisions in their life not to get educated, or to be alcholholics & drug addicts, or to bring into the world more children than they can afford to raise etc.?....in other words...Hard-Working Good Folks have to fucking pay for other folks laziness & stupidity...that is Income Redistribution...otherwise known as Socialism. The Dems also want to increase Corporate taxes...the USA ALREADY has one of the HIGHEST Corp tax rates in the world...all that does is filter down to you & me...the consumers...They also want...( Mr. Dingle ) to take away your tax deduction for home mortgages...something very sacred to Americans....SO expect the Dems to totally fuck up your financial life... by raising your taxes, eliminating your deductions, making corporations charge you more for everything you buy and need, and making gas go way up....Can't eveyone see that despite whatever your beliefs are about "other" issues, that your finances are the one true reality that hits you every day, and that you must not allow the Dems to ruin your hopes & dreams of EVER being able "to make it" in America?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 3:28 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


There is no limit to the hunger Gov't has for YOUR money.


Global warming is a flat out lie, and yet this clown would fleece our wallets to take from us to grow the power of the Fed Gov't.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 4:34 AM

FLETCH2


And the current bunch are fiscally responsable how exactly? There has been so much pork in the last few years that congress is probably quoted on the Chicago Merchantile exchange.

They all do it. You know when your representative tells you that he's won funding from Washington for that road, or that bridge of that program that will make X jobs? That's pork for the rest of the country. Of course if he came back empty handed you'd replace the bum for not getting you your "cut."

Don't want to pay for government stop demanding and using the services. Simple right?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 5:39 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I don't know much about global warming. I've been inclined to believe that if the Earth is gonna get warmer, then it's gonna get warmer.

I'm not sure what a tax on gasoline is going to do about it. Maybe they want us to stop using gasoline? If that's the case, the do-nothing approach works well. Gasoline is going to get scarce soon, and it will continually price itself out of the market as it does so.

BMW has a hydrogen powered hybrid, now. It has a gas tank and a hydrogen tank. I don't think you get more mainstream than BMW. I think we can make Electric cars work for inner-city travel, too.

Seems IF you see gasoline as a problem (I see it as a self-correcting problem, but oh well) then you want to offer tax breaks, not additional taxes.

Big tax credit for any refueling station that installs hydrogen or electric car hookups.

Big tax credit for any consumer who buys a hydrogen or electric (or hybrid) car.

That'll spark a trend. And Gasoline? It'll get expensive all by its lonesome.

--Anthony



"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 8:05 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Anthony...$.50 additional tax on gas 'aint gonna do anything to make Americans drive less. Last year when gas was much higher..( 3.25+ ) our consumption still hit record highs.

The Dems want to steal this money from you so they can give your hard-earned salary to illegal alien's children healthcare & education, and to provide attorneys for terrorists. In other words, the Dems feel that EVERY single person on this planet is actually the same as a citizen of the USA, and I wouldn't be surprised if they try to pass through legislation that allows Muslim Jihadists the right to vote in America.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 8:32 AM

FLETCH2


You missed out drowning puppies and throwning white babies to the lions.

American petrol prices are amongst the cheapest in the industrial world. You also have the crapest public transport network and are behind the curve in new transport technology. Some day you wont be able to afford this lifestyle and then there really will be chaos. The sooner you can create more efficient transport options the better.

Even if you don't believe in global warming believe this, China is buying oil exploitation rights worldwide, even if GW is Al Gore's daydream that would still happen and petrol prices will rise. You need to start working on those alternatives now.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 8:37 AM

RIGHTEOUS9




Jong ---

do you really think we don't pay for those things anyway? YOu think that when neighborhoods fester...when people produce children that are cared for poorly, that the rest of us hardworking americans don't suffer for it?

Who pays for prisons? who suffers at the hands of violent crime? Who's equity suffers because they are too close to a bad neighborhood? You act like you can turn away from these things and let them sort themselves out, and all of us "upstanding," "hard-working" americans will be just fine.

Whether you want us to be or not, we're all in the same boat. If we don't try to reverse trends in those areas, by trying to provide the basic neccessities for these kids so that they have slightly better opportunity, do you think things are actually going to get better?

.............

As to your point about what our government is going to do wiht the money...now that is a legitimate question.

It's becoming a popular joke to say that Republicans tell you not to trust your government, and then they get into office and prove it to you. From where I"m sitting Bush nearly convinced me that maybe the government having control of my money isn't such a good idea...

until I came back to one fundamental aspect of our government. That is that we are it. We still have control, if we take it, over who we elect to office, and in that way, we have oversight over how they use our money, if we choose to use it.

Personally, I think social programs are a good idea...I think we're paying for all manner of societal ills that you think we could be ignoring , and I'd rather pay for it in a way that is preventative, than be buying some really overpriced band-aids.

I disagree somewhat about corporate taxes filtering down to the consumer, the same with the gas tax for that matter. The reality is a company will charge what they think they can get. If the magic number isn't 50 cents higher for gas...then they will lower their profit margin per gallon.

If people aren't buying their g.i.joe for 15 bucks, they won't continue to sell it for that much. I'm really not convinced that the taxes are fronted by the consumer. If somebody can show me otherwise, I'm happy to learn from it.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 8:40 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Flet..instead of being an obtuse twit here, why don't you actually read my first post and address the REAL realities of the Dem's insane tax hikes; tax hikes that will devastate the middle class, and turn our country into one fucked-up Euro-style nanny-state. I believe I gave at least 5 or 6 of their agenda items.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 8:43 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by Righteous9:

Jong ---
do you really think we don't pay for those things anyway? YOu think that when neighborhoods fester...when people produce children that are cared for poorly, that the rest of us hardworking americans don't suffer for it?

Who pays for prisons? who suffers at the hands of violent crime? Who's equity suffers because they are too close to a bad neighborhood? You act like you can turn away from these things and let them sort themselves out, and all of us "upstanding," "hard-working" americans will be just fine.

Whether you want us to be or not, we're all in the same boat. If we don't try to reverse trends in those areas, by trying to provide the basic neccessities for these kids so that they have slightly better opportunity, do you think things are actually going to get better?

.............

As to your point about what our government is going to do wiht the money...now that is a legitimate question.

It's becoming a popular joke to say that Republicans tell you not to trust your government, and then they get into office and prove it to you. From where I"m sitting Bush nearly convinced me that maybe the government having control of my money isn't such a good idea...

until I came back to one fundamental aspect of our government. That is that we are it. We still have control, if we take it, over who we elect to office, and in that way, we have oversight over how they use our money, if we choose to use it.

Personally, I think social programs are a good idea...I think we're paying for all manner of societal ills that you think we could be ignoring , and I'd rather pay for it in a way that is preventative, than be buying some really overpriced band-aids.

I disagree somewhat about corporate taxes filtering down to the consumer, the same with the gas tax for that matter. The reality is a company will charge what they think they can get. If the magic number isn't 50 cents higher for gas...then they will lower their profit margin per gallon.

If people aren't buying their g.i.joe for 15 bucks, they won't continue to sell it for that much. I'm really not convinced that the taxes are fronted by the consumer. If somebody can show me otherwise, I'm happy to learn from it.


So if I understaand you correctly...you are happy & willing at the prospect of taking home a significanly less amount of money in the future...you want to pay more taxes? Is that correct?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 8:50 AM

FLETCH2


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Flet..instead of being an obtuse twit here, why don't you actually read my first post and address the REAL realities of the Dem's insane tax hikes; tax hikes that will devastate the middle class, and turn our country into one fucked-up Euro-style nanny-state. I believe I gave at least 5 or 6 of their agenda items.



No I read it. However I don't believe it. Election cycle dude, right now the Reps are out telling the fundies that they will revoke Roe v Wade, and telling the fiscal conservatives they will cut the budget. The Dems are out promising pie to everyone that will listen and you know what? After the election it will be business as usual and nothing will really change.

You still need to work on the TGVs.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 8:52 AM

RIGHTEOUS9




Because I think government can actually be the solution to some of our problems if we make it so, I'm fine with slightly more taxes. Because I think that it could actually make our cost-of-living cheaper in the future, again, depending on its implementation, I don't neccesarily think of it as a sure loss of revenue but an adjustment of where that loss comes from.

Sure, I'm not so happy about my tax dollars going to an endless war, or providing faith-based programs with kick-backs, or providing obscene ammounts of corporate welfare, but that's a matter of how we make our government use that money, a responsibility we have not taken very seriously.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 8:58 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
And the current bunch are fiscally responsable how exactly?


I note for the record that the "current bunch" are Democrats who have controlled Congress since January.

Your point about the "former bunch" is well taken and probably the number 1 reason they lost control of Congress (at least Domestic reason).

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 9:05 AM

RIGHTEOUS9


well,

the democrats hardly control congress now.

That's the most I'm going to do to defend them though.

They are truly doing nearly jack and shit. They've put 60 votes as the requirement to pass any bill. They aren't even forcing the Republicans to go on record with a fillibuster...

and then they want to tell us that the Republicans are at fault. That's bullshit.

And how the hell do republican bills keep getting to the floor? When Republicans were in charage democrats almost got nothing to the floor. The only thing congress has done is to pass a bullshit bill condmening an ad.

way to go, assholes



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 9:26 AM

JONGSSTRAW


This Thread is about telling people about the dangers of electing a Democrat President......I believe the Republicans cannot take back Congress, but as long as there is a Republican President there to VETO the Dem's insane tax hike dreams, us poor working stiffs can live our lives in the style we are accustomed to now. With A Dem getting elected President, coupled with a Dem Congress...watch out!!! :

1) Gas at 3.50 + permanently
2) No home mortgage interest deduction
3) No capital gains protection
4) Less take home money each week in your pay
5) Higher tax tables for Federal Income Tax
6) Tax dollars for illegal aliens'

I'm all for social programs too.....as long as they don't steal it from my weekly paycheck.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 9:37 AM

RIGHTEOUS9


What style is that?

have you been paying attention to the U.S. economy, the strength of the dollar, and the recent cries of a possible recession?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 9:48 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by Righteous9:
What style is that?

have you been paying attention to the U.S. economy, the strength of the dollar, and the recent cries of a possible recession?


Oh come on now....you're doing fine I'm sure...you've got your Firefly DVD's & your Serenity DVD'd and your idle leisure time to chat on these boards...life is good. Me... I work hard, I just got a promotion and a raise...now I think my raise will disappear, and I'll be back to square one again

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 9:50 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Flet..instead of being an obtuse twit here, why don't you actually read my first post and address the REAL realities of the Dem's insane tax hikes; tax hikes that will devastate the middle class, and turn our country into one fucked-up Euro-style nanny-state. I believe I gave at least 5 or 6 of their agenda items.


No I read it. However I don't believe it. Election cycle dude, right now the Reps are out telling the fundies that they will revoke Roe v Wade, and telling the fiscal conservatives they will cut the budget. The Dems are out promising pie to everyone that will listen and you know what? After the election it will be business as usual and nothing will really change.

You still need to work on the TGVs.


Well you could be right, and I hope you are right. Financial pundits on the financial cable shows are worried big time.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 9:56 AM

FLETCH2


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Well you could be right, and I hope you are right. Financial pundits on the financial cable shows are worried big time.



They also earn more money in an afternoon than an average stiff sees in a year. Their interests are not nescessarily your interests and I'm sure it's in their interest to keep the folks they've already bought off rather than bribing a new set next year.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 2:29 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Well you could be right, and I hope you are right. Financial pundits on the financial cable shows are worried big time

They also earn more money in an afternoon than an average stiff sees in a year. Their interests are not nescessarily your interests and I'm sure it's in their interest to keep the folks they've already bought off rather than bribing a new set next year,


You're being obtuse and evasive aqain. I'll just ask you some straight questions :
1) Do you want to take home less money every week from your paycheck?
2) Do you want the Govt. adding .50 on top of the oil co's already inflated gas prices?
3) Do you want to owe the Govt. money when you file your taxes, or get less of a refund?
4) Do you own a home? Do you want your mortgage interest deduction eliminated?
5) Of the few bucks you save or invest, do you want the Govt. taking more money out of any profits you might make?

C'mon...you OWE me honest answers to these questions...and then honestly ask yourself if you still want Democrats elected to do all this with NO Republican opposition? Thank You

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 2:56 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Global warming is a flat out lie, and yet this clown would fleece our wallets to take from us to grow the power of the Fed Gov't.


Rap...I meant to respond to your reply earlier. Your words are SO refreshing and SO perfect that I cannot thank you enough for posting them.
Fuck Global Warming bullshit..I say loudly!
It's a Gorram, Rutting pseudo-religion, based on pseudo-science using goat entrails and mind melds with penguins as it's empiracal data....With a FAT washed-out, useless & pompously absurd hypocrite asshole... a sensei of the insane, leading the America-loathing lemming chorus, as he jets around the globe burning mega-trillions of litres of petrol, and polluting the air we breathe. A sad, sad, utterly pathetic shell of a once-decent man, desperately searching for a scintilla of relevence in the world....what's his name again?...PN...No...actually, the Oscar Winning darling of Streisand's backyard (complete with illegal immigrant defense laser death system) gang of Hollywood 8th grade drop-out intellectual elites....the almost 'cept for Florida stolen vote Former Mr. President Al (is Nicholson looking?) Gore.
And, yeah...the Democrats who own Congress are poised and eager to steal from all us normal working family folk to support and grow their abhorant and disgusting voter and bloodsucker BASE of fucked-up losers, miscreants, whiners, cock-sucking glory-hole anarchist freaks, criminals, illegal aliens with bubonic plague, dopeheads, transvestite dominatrixi, jihadist sleeper-cell embeds, religion-hating ego-centrist libertines, and Candides in all sizes....for the most part, that is.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 3:22 PM

FLETCH2


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Well you could be right, and I hope you are right. Financial pundits on the financial cable shows are worried big time

They also earn more money in an afternoon than an average stiff sees in a year. Their interests are not nescessarily your interests and I'm sure it's in their interest to keep the folks they've already bought off rather than bribing a new set next year,


You're being obtuse and evasive aqain. I'll just ask you some straight questions :
1) Do you want to take home less money every week from your paycheck?




That depends. If I got something back of value I'd say yes, if it's to fund another bridge in Alaska or a toad farm in Montanna then no.

Quote:



2) Do you want the Govt. adding .50 on top of the oil co's already inflated gas prices?




Honestly? It doesn't bother me. I'm a European so by comparison to back home you pay chump change for fuel. When I lived in Sweden I could read my email, work on stories or read a book in my daily commute to work because there was good public transit.

It is quicker to take a train from Paris to London than it is to fly. You need that kind of a system going forward unless you want to be trading American money and blood for dwindling supplies of oil. If 50c is what that costs count me in.


Quote:



3) Do you want to owe the Govt. money when you file your taxes, or get less of a refund?




I suspect I already pay more of my income than you do because I pay my own social security. No I'm not keen on spending more but then I hate waste. If I had the feeling that people were being responsable with my money I would feel better handing it over. As it is giving money to congress is like handing your wallet to an 8 year old.

Quote:




C'mon...you OWE me honest answers to these questions...and then honestly ask yourself if you still want Democrats elected to do all this with NO Republican opposition? Thank You



Personally I wouldn't (and in fact can't) elect any of them. I still pay taxes though... has to be something wrong with that...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 3:37 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Fletch...great, honest answers.

I think I'm moving to Europe...I am especially envious of all your vacation (holiday) time.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 3:41 PM

LEADB


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Once again the Democrats are ready to destroy the economy, and take hard-earned money out of your pocket......
Rep. Dingle of Michigan and Ways & Means Dems want to add $ .50 tax hike on gasoline to combat "global warming".

How about we call it a war tax and pay down some of the costs if the Iraqi war?

As to the rest of it, the republicans don't have the guts to do -anything- to either balance the budget or resolve the long term social security problems. How about throw the bums out. We can put in you, Frem, me, Rue, and Hero. Then we can make fun of each other's position on the senate floor... wouldn't that be cool!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 3:48 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Ok on the war tax
Ok, Republicans are generally as or more despicable than their distinguished colleagues on the other side.
Ok, we Browncoats run the country! That would truly be doing the impossible, but it would be fun.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 28, 2007 6:20 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Afraid you'll prolly have to argue without me - I already have some locals trying to make me a city councilperson, in spite of the fact that as an Anarchist, I believe the best Government is no government - and flat told em that if elected, I plan on holding to that and not showing up for work!
(To which their response was *GOOD* since all budget increases here require unanimous approval and that'd kill em dead, dead, dead.)

If you put me in Congress I'd likely do much the same thing, removing one more motivator of the States machinery to shaft us - that or happily dump sand in the gears, grinning all the while, and heaven help if you if I get the floor on a filibuster and decide to go on about the Founding Fathers and their intentions...

I'll laugh my ass off if I DO wind up on city council though, especially since the bastards are already afraid of me - please don't nominate me for Congress however, as I am not sure I have *enough* sand to jam that one up.


-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 3:53 AM

LEADB


Gee, we were hoping you'd at least stop by to occasionally remind us what bone heads we are for not cutting the gov back faster than we theoretically would be. But I'll respect your platform. We'll put little signs on your chair calling for less government, in case anyone forgets your position.

====
Please vote for Firefly hourly: http://richlabonte.net/tvvote/index.html

Consider $5/year to support FFF: http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/pay/T39WWCGS4JYCV4

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 6:16 AM

VETERAN

Don't squat with your spurs on.


Quote:

Originally posted by Righteous9:
well,

the democrats hardly control congress now.

That's the most I'm going to do to defend them though.

They are truly doing nearly jack and shit. They've put 60 votes as the requirement to pass any bill. They aren't even forcing the Republicans to go on record with a fillibuster...

and then they want to tell us that the Republicans are at fault. That's bullshit.

And how the hell do republican bills keep getting to the floor? When Republicans were in charage democrats almost got nothing to the floor. The only thing congress has done is to pass a bullshit bill condmening an ad.

way to go, assholes



They've really dropped the ball. It's as if because they didn't win the Senate they've given up. The only thing I'd add in the Dem's defence is that they allow the Republicans to participate. In the last congress the Republicans basically locked the Democrats out.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 6:28 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Have you looked at the value of the dollar lately? It's fallen to a record low. As in: never before since currencies started being traded. That means that anything you import, which is... just about everything... has suddenly become more expensive by about 30%. Anything that you put away for retirement, denominated in American dollars (which is just about everything).... 30% just went pfffft! Inflation is a stealth tax, and we can thank the Rethuglicans and their massive deficit spending. Not only are they destroying the military, they're destroying the dollar.

What I'd be pushing for:

Out of Iraq, now. That eliminates about $400 B per year of spending immediately.

Simplify the tax code: treat people and corporations the same (tax on income), reduce the tax rate, and limit the number of "steps" to about five, inflation-indexed. Eliminate the AMT. Don't tax any entity- business or otherwise- that makes less than $50,000 per year.

I'd toy with the idea of checkboxes on income tax forms: Where do you want your $$$ to go?

Cut out all pork. Much as our agency enjoyed getting a small grant it's not worth it to the nation as a whole to allow this kind of deal-making to go on.

Investigate past contracts for potential money recovery.

Institute a carbon tax. Nothing promotes conservation like money.

End the "War on Drugs". Legalize marijuana, and decriminalize possession. Take the money spent on enforcement and incarceration, and turn it towards treatment.

Institute a single payer health care system, funded by the govt, which allows additional insurance to be purchased to cover non-covered items or experimental/ optional procedures. This would make American businesses more competitive, release billions of dollars from health insurance companies and pharmas into other areas of the economy, and allow a massive consumer (The Fed) to negotiate for better prices.

REQUIRE that all parties with an FCC license make time equally and freely available to Presidential and Congressional candidates who meet minimum criteria for viability.

Rescind the Military Commissions Act and large portions of the Patriot Act, and make "signing statements" illegal. Also undo the secrecy instituted by Bush and Cheney, and pass laws that would make their particular bullshit illegal.


Wow, this could be fun!

--------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 7:11 AM

FLETCH2


As previously mentioned, I'm not a big fan of pork, however one thing it does do is allow transfer of funds between regions, which is important if you are a large diverse economy. Part of the problem the Euro has is that there is no transfers, which means if you set things like interest rates and exchange rates centrally what is good for one part of the economy (or one region) can be bad for the others. Without some compensations somewhere you can create havok or accidentally crush growth in some places while trying to promote growth in others.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 7:19 AM

LEADB


Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
As previously mentioned, I'm not a big fan of pork, however one thing it does do is allow transfer of funds between regions, which is important if you are a large diverse economy. Part of the problem the Euro has is that there is no transfers, which means if you set things like interest rates and exchange rates centrally what is good for one part of the economy (or one region) can be bad for the others. Without some compensations somewhere you can create havok or accidentally crush growth in some places while trying to promote growth in others.


There's pork and fatty pork. Like the bridge to nowhere. There's got to be a way to simply kill the truly stupid project.
---
Go Sig!


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 7:29 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Oh, and defend our border against illegals and terrorists.


And raise the minumum wage to $10/ hour and then inflation-index that TOO.

-----------------

You don't need "pork" to transfer funds, because a lot of those transfers will not lessen the inequities over time. Because half winds up as grease in a contractor's pocket. If you're going to xfer funds, xfer them for education or health care or low-cost housing loans or a specific, regular program. Not these one-off boondoggles.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 7:59 AM

FLETCH2


The point I was making was that you need some method of transfer. If you set interest rates so that northern industry florishes but southern agriculture dies you have a problem. You have to have some method to move some of the north's gains down to offset the south's losses.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:11 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Well, there are a lot of strict Constitutionalists who would disagree with you. In their view, our Constitution does not allow Xfer of funds between states because "promote the general welfare" is not an enumerated Federal power.

So, with that caveat, I personally agree that from a practical standpoint there should be a mechanism for xfering funds. Just not pork.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:50 AM

FLETCH2


By the same token a strict constitutionalist probably wouldn't agree to centralised control of interest rates and money supply either.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 9:50 AM

LEADB


yes, I think you are right fletch.

Some 'money talk' recently:
http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=18&t=30067

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, September 29, 2007 12:53 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I'm gonna add one more plank to my platform:

Get out of CAFTA and NAFTA.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Sat, December 21, 2024 19:06 - 256 posts
Hollywood exposes themselves as the phony whores they are
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:55 - 69 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:29 - 4989 posts
Music II
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:22 - 135 posts
WMD proliferation the spread of chemical and bio weapons, as of the collapse of Syria
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:15 - 3 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:11 - 6965 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, December 21, 2024 17:58 - 4901 posts
TERRORISM EXPANDS TO GERMANY ... and the USA, Hungary, and Sweden
Sat, December 21, 2024 15:20 - 36 posts
Ellen Page is a Dude Now
Sat, December 21, 2024 15:00 - 242 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, December 21, 2024 14:48 - 978 posts
Who hates Israel?
Sat, December 21, 2024 13:45 - 81 posts
French elections, and France in general
Sat, December 21, 2024 13:43 - 187 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL