Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Pirate News stars on History Channel
Monday, November 5, 2007 6:31 PM
PIRATENEWS
John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!
Monday, November 5, 2007 7:35 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Monday, November 5, 2007 7:56 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: I'll never undestand why so much work and effort goes into producting such clear and obvious lies. It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager
Monday, November 5, 2007 10:56 PM
OLDENGLANDDRY
Quote:Originally posted by piratenews: Or perhaps it was
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 12:46 AM
Quote:Originally posted by piratenews: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: I'll never undestand why so much work and effort goes into producting such clear and obvious lies. It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: I'll never undestand why so much work and effort goes into producting such clear and obvious lies. It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists.
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 1:44 AM
Quote: "Operation NORTHWOODS may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. Operation Northwoods had called for nothing less than the launch of a secret campaign of terrorism within the United States in order to blame Castro and provoke a war with Cuba." —James Bamford, ABC News, "Friendly Fire - U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba," May 1, 2001 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4242016437813472857&hl=en "In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. Code named Operation NORTHWOODS, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro. America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation." The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years. The Joint Chiefs at the time were headed by Eisenhower appointee Army Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer, who, with the signed plans in hand made a pitch to McNamara on March 13, 1962, recommending Operation Northwoods be run by the military. Whether the Joint Chiefs' plans were rejected by McNamara in the meeting is not clear. But three days later, President Kennedy told Lemnitzer directly there was virtually no possibility of ever using overt force to take Cuba, Bamford reports. Within months, Lemnitzer would be denied another term as chairman and transferred to another job. Ironically, the documents came to light, says Bamford, in part because of the 1992 Oliver Stone film JFK, which examined the possibility of a conspiracy behind the assassination of President Kennedy. "The scary thing is none of this stuff comes out until 40 years after," says Bamford." —David Ruppe, ABC News, "Friendly Fire - U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba," May 1, 2001 http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1 "We could blow up a drone (unmannded) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. The presense of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The US could follow with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existant crew. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation. We could develop a Communist Cuba terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Flordia cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States. Use of MIG-type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping, and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type palnes would be useful. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce that fact. Hijacking attampts against US civil air and surface craft should be encouraged. It is possible to create an incident which would demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civilian airliner from the United States. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be subsituted for the actual civil aircraft and the passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rondevous. From the rondevous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly to an auxiliary airfield at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. Meanwhile the drone aircraft will continue to fly the filed flight plan. The drone will be transmitting on the international distress frequency "MAY DAY" message stating it is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by the destruction of aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow IACO radio stations to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the incident. It is possible to create an incident that will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly Tail-end Charlie. While near the Cuban island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. This pilot would then fly at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who performed the mission under an alias would resume his proper identity. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared. A submarine or small craft would distribute F-101 parts, parachute, etc. The pilots retuning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found." —Jewish Zionist General L.L. Lemnitzer, chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff at Pentagon, Memo to Secretary of War Robert McNamara - Subject: Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba - Operation NORTHWOODS, March 13, 1962 (declassifed 2000) http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf 9/11 victims sue Bush White House under RICO Act for perping the 9/11 terror attacks http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4100991221878271500&hl=en
Quote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendi_Deng Hanoi Hannity: "Outsourcing your job is good for me." "US ports owned by Commie China is good for me." "Dead and disabled US soldiers are good for me." "Sir Rupert dines with Hillary every week." "Ron Paul does not exist in my 'Verse." "As far as Chinese goes, I resented it." -Adam Tudyk, The Making of Firefly The Lone Gunmen Episode 1: Pilot Operation Northwoods on Fox TV, Air Date: March 4, 2001 CIA hijacks airliner by remote control to crash into World Trade Center http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/Lone%20Gunmen/The_Lone_Gunmen_Episode_1.htm
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 2:30 AM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 2:31 AM
ARCLIGHT
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 4:00 AM
HERO
Quote:Originally posted by piratenews: This infowar reminds me of playing full-contact football, slamming down to the endzone, using strength and skill to overpower the enemy and score another touchdown. Sometimes you get knocked out, sometimes you're voted Most Valuable Player.
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 4:10 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: What baffles me is that so many people can be 100% sure that everything that you're saying is a lie. Why anybody would believe 100% in their school indoctrination, the words of our corrupt government behind it or anything snopes.com says while completely and totally being able to claim that everything that comes out of your mouth is a blatant lie is a mystery to me.
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 4:42 AM
FREMDFIRMA
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 5:15 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Fremdfirma: As he mentioned in another thread, and I have long had suspicions, why are so many of the car bombs over in iraq... american made cars ?
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 8:18 AM
Quote:SCRIPT OF POPMECH'S HIJACKING OF HISTORY CHANNEL (TITLE: Flight 93) Lester Holt: (intro blah blah) Val McClatchy: If you google my name, I come up as a total fraud. Lester Holt: She's become the target of bloggers, who claim the photograph is a fake. David Coburn: (blah blah "smoke from a chemical fire") Lester Holt: Val says 9/11 "conspiracists" (sic) have harassed her with emails and phone calls. (start panning screenshot of "PirateNews.org September911Surprise.com Flight 93 Shot Down by John Lee" page) Lester Holt: They believe Flight 93 was shot down as part of a govt conspiracy. (end panning screenshot of September911Surprise.com Flight 93 page) (blah blah) Val McClatchy: Some people need to get a life, they've got way too much time on their hands...
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 9:24 AM
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 9:37 AM
CHRISISALL
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 11:21 AM
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 1:46 PM
CITIZEN
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: John Lee can't answer a simple question - Why did the South Tower fall before the North Tower, even though the North Tower was hit first ??
Tuesday, November 6, 2007 9:57 PM
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 12:54 AM
Quote: As an aside.... People have thought I was full of shit for over 5 years now when I told them that real estate was a bad investment and that prices would spiral out of control.....
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:35 AM
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:38 AM
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:15 AM
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 3:58 AM
JONGSSTRAW
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 4:24 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: All I'm sayin Hero, my man, is that any of the shit the Neo-Cons, the treasonous Liberals, the late Jerry Falwell, or Richard Dawkens are trying to give me every day is just as hard to swallow as anything PN says.
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 5:11 AM
BLUESUNCOMPANYMAN
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: John Lee can't answer a simple question - Why did the South Tower fall before the North Tower, even though the North Tower was hit first ?? B]
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 5:22 AM
Quote:Originally posted by bluesuncompanyman: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: John Lee can't answer a simple question - Why did the South Tower fall before the North Tower, even though the North Tower was hit first ?? B] I agree with your general assement of John Lee. As far as why the towers fell as they did, the analysis of the structural failures of all buildings, including Bldg 7, was performed at various universities known for their schools of civil engineering including my alma mater, Purdue University's school of Civil Engineering. I graduated from Purdue's CE program in 1999. In fact when I watched the program in question on the history channel, they cited people that I actually had met during my 1995-1999 school days. It gave the "expert opinion" listed in the program some personal credibility to me because I knew a lot of these things already. To hear Purdue Professors quoted by the spokesman from Popular mechanics made me proud of my school for keeping an unbaised view of the structural failure facts. I am so sick of hearing over and over this question: "Jet fuel can't burn hot enough to melt structural steel. So how can it be claimed that the steel failed? There must have been secondary demolitions!!!" The steel didn't melt. Nobody claims the steel melted, or if anyone did they're an idiot and should be ignored. I recall clearly my sophmore year at CE we took a class coded CE231 which is the class for introduction to steel and the behavior of structural metals. It's a required spohmore class for all CE grads. I recall quite clearly performing labs in the class with steel rods where we'd pull them apart, crush them, heat them, impact load them (swing a weight into the side of a rod and watch it shear) and twist them apart. It was a class all about learning why steel fails, and it lays the foundation of the structural courses to some later. When steel is heated it looses what we engineers call "strength". When heated into the 2000 F range it'll eventually melt. This is what happens in steel mills. Lower temps will not melt the steel, but it will certainly weaken it. This is why fireproofing material is sometimes spray-applied to steel. All expert Civil Engineers I have read agree that the plane impacts blew the fireproofing apart and the steel started experiencing super-heating. The bar joists on the floors closest to the flames started weaking from this hellish environment, and as the minutes ticked by, the joists became weaker and weaker until failure occured. It was like watching a lab in my CE231 class come to life. This is why buildings 1 and 2 came down. It's why bldg 7 came down. The steel that was being weakened simply could not support the massive weight of the building above. To answer your question I quoted to start this post (what got me to ranting in the first place) the north tower was hit 1st but had far less weight above the impact area. This is why the south tower falls before the north. Both buildings were mortally wounded by the impacts, but circumstances provided more time for the north tower. And to you piratenews, I cannot respect what you are doing. While I experienced no personal loss on 9/11, I know 1 family that lives in new england that did. You insult their pain and it makes me ill. You want so badly to prove a conspiricy you grasp anything you can. At the heart of every pearl is a sand grain. I visited your website today and while I'm sure there are grains of truth on your pages, there are no pearls and there never will be. Do not fear me. Our's is a peaceful race and we must live in harmony.
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 9:45 AM
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 10:06 AM
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 11:45 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: John Lee can't answer a simple question - Why did the South Tower fall before the North Tower, even though the North Tower was hit first ?? Now watch, the coward won't offer up a reply, he'll just cut and paste 27 paragraphs of his own bullshit and act as if it's " undeniable fact " , call me a jew lover, rant and rave about the Bohemian Grove orgies, and then spout off about how everyone in D.C. is a homosexual, EXCEPT Barney Frank. 3,2,1....
Wednesday, November 7, 2007 11:50 PM
Quote: Typically, the actual implosion only takes a few seconds. To many onlookers, the speed of destruction is the most incredible aspect of an implosion. How can a building that took months and months to build, and stood up to the elements for a hundred years or more, collapse into a pile of rubble as if it were a sand castle? Following the blast, a cloud of dust billows out around the wreckage, enveloping nearby spectators. After the cloud has cleared, the blasters survey the scene and review the tapes to see if everything went according to plan. At this stage, it is crucial to confirm that all of the explosives were detonated and to remove any explosives that did not go off. http://science.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion2.htm CIA FBI Ghouliani HQ in WTC 7
Quote:MOLTEN STEEL AT WTC When contacted by the American Free Press (AFPN) and asked, if they ever had seen concrete pulverized as it was in the WTC, they said: "No-never". "Tully said, that there were hot spots where he observed 'literally molten steel'...Everything that was above grade -above the 6th and 7th floor -disintegrated...it was like an explosion." Tully Construction of Flushing, NY is the only american-owned company who was hired for the "cleanup of Sep11th". Tully retained Controlled Demolition Inc., Phoenix, Md, who had been involved once in the demolition of the bombed Murrah Building in Oklahoma in 1995. Controlled Demolition is specialised in implosions of big towers, like i.e. the Landmark Hotel Tower* in Las Vegas or the Columbus Homes Housing Projects in Newark, New Jersey. In 1995 they imploded the Mendes Caldeira Building São Paulo Brazil(361 feet tall), as they say on their website, the "tallest standing concrete building ever felled with explosives". In 1998 they imploded a 439 feet, the "tallest structural steel building ever imploded." In February 2000, a federal grand jury indicted Mark Loizeaux, Douglas Loizeaux and Controlled Demolition, Inc. on charges of falsely reporting campaign contributions to the campaign of Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.). www.911review.org/Sept11Wiki/ControlledCleanup.shtml
Thursday, November 8, 2007 12:42 AM
Quote:Originally posted by piratenews: That was my job in US Air Force. Uncle Sam paid me to bomb and sabotage US Govt buildings, sabotage US military aircraft, and sabotage US military bases using nuclear bombs.
Thursday, November 8, 2007 12:47 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: I ain't saying you're right about everything PN, or even half of it, but I do find your work to be fascinating either way. What baffles me is that so many people can be 100% sure that everything that you're saying is a lie. Why anybody would believe 100% in their school indoctrination, the words of our corrupt government behind it or anything snopes.com says while completely and totally being able to claim that everything that comes out of your mouth is a blatant lie is a mystery to me.
Quote:Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist by H. Michael Sweeney www.MKZine.com Spring/Summer 2003 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. 6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint. 9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect. 17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues. 18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.' www.whale.to/m/disin.html www.911review.org/Wiki/RulesOfDisinformation.shtml www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html Examples & response: www.proparanoid.net/truth.htm Private Spies Stalk The Internet An organization of highly trained, committed and ruthless individuals with links to global intelligence agencies are using the Internet to try to foment terrorism in order to advance their unified political agenda. No it's not Al-Qaeda, it's Vigil, the elite private spies who are stalking the web and telling the government about any e-speech they deem suspicious. The Scotsman reports, Quote: The organisation is not the US Central Intelligence Agency or Britain's MI6 but Vigil, a shadowy network of retired spies, senior military personnel, anti-terrorism specialists and banking experts. "Sixty per cent of Vigil's work involves gaining information via the internet, by infiltrating chatrooms." "The information gleaned is passed on to authorities such as the FBI, and British Counter Terrorism Command (CTC)." http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1732682006 In addition, the Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror. www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Raw_obtains_CENTCOM_email_to_bloggers_1016.html "QKHILLTOP was a cryptonym assigned in 1954 to a project to study Chinese Communist brainwashing techniques and to develop interrogation techniques. Most of the early studies are believed to have been conducted by the Cornell University Medical School Human Ecology Study Programs. The effort was absorbed into the MKULTRA program and the QKHILLTOP cryptonym became obsolete." -U.S. Senate Hearing on MKULTRA, Appendix C, QKHILLTOP DEFINITION, 1973 www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm "The concepts involved in manipulating behavior are found by many people both within and outside the Agency to be distasteful and unethical. Nevertheless, there have been major accomplishments both in research and operational employment. Over the ten-year life of the program many additional avenues to the control of human behavior have been designated under the MKULTRA charter, including radiation, electro-shock, and harassment substances. Some activities raise questions of legality implicit in the original charter. A final phase of the testing places the rights and interests of US citizens in jeopardy. Technical Services Division initiated a program for covert testing of materials on unwitting US citizens in 1955. TSD has pursued a philosophy of minimum documentation in keeping with the high sensitivity of the projects. Some files contained little or no data at all. There are just two individuals in TSD who have full knowledge of the MKULTRA program, and most of that knowledge is unrecorded." -MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence FROM: CIA Inspector General, NB 108-113, 26 July 1963 www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol#_ednref13
Quote: The organisation is not the US Central Intelligence Agency or Britain's MI6 but Vigil, a shadowy network of retired spies, senior military personnel, anti-terrorism specialists and banking experts. "Sixty per cent of Vigil's work involves gaining information via the internet, by infiltrating chatrooms." "The information gleaned is passed on to authorities such as the FBI, and British Counter Terrorism Command (CTC)." http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1732682006
Thursday, November 8, 2007 1:04 AM
Quote: Originally posted by AURaptor: John Lee can't answer a simple question - Why did the South Tower fall before the North Tower, even though the North Tower was hit first ?? Now watch, the coward won't offer up a reply, he'll just cut and paste 27 paragraphs of his own bullshit and act as if it's " undeniable fact " 3,2,1....
Quote: The 3 WTC towers each fell within 10 seconds of pressing a button to ignite the preinstalled bombs. WTC Twin Towers required 1,000s of preinstalled bombs, WTC 7 required only a few 100 bombs. Plus many miles of wiring and explosive detonation cord.
Quote: PN dork said: That was my job in US Air Force. Uncle Sam paid me to bomb and sabotage US Govt buildings, sabotage US military aircraft, and sabotage US military bases using nuclear bombs.
Thursday, November 8, 2007 3:01 AM
Thursday, November 8, 2007 9:57 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: Why are you arguing with this Jew-hating, truth-hating psychopath? Don't ya know he squeezes one out every time someone here engages his insanity?
Thursday, November 8, 2007 10:22 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Quote:As I predicted, __________ failed to answer the simple question
Thursday, November 8, 2007 10:39 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SignyM: Quote:As I predicted, __________ failed to answer the simple question Whose name belongs in the blank? The pot's? Or the kettle's? .
Thursday, November 8, 2007 10:48 AM
Quote:I respond
Thursday, November 8, 2007 11:51 AM
Thursday, November 8, 2007 12:33 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Fremdfirma: "Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist" Golly Gee Rap, that stuff sounds pretty familiar, you're just pissed that he called you on it so effectively. What you don't realize is that to the rest of the thinking, reasoning world, you sound just as crazy as he does. Racism ? Check. Theological hatred ? Check. False or misleading assumptions ? Check. Rants instead of answers ? Check. What really makes you any different ? -F
Thursday, November 8, 2007 1:12 PM
Thursday, November 8, 2007 1:39 PM
Friday, November 9, 2007 9:22 AM
Quote:Originally posted by piratenews: Isn't it funny how some folks are incapable of seeing reality, even when their health and wealth depends on it for their survival? If they aren't professional disinfo agents, or mockingbird sheeple, they're simply insane. Addicts and alcoholics are jailed in loony bins for the crime of denial. It's like telling your friend that their spouse is not only sleeping around, but dancing at the strip club, turning tricks, worshipping Satan, looting your bank account and pension fund, signed a death insurance contract without your knowlege, and hired a team of hitmen. Some people will always refuse to believe the facts of life, no matter what the evidence. And they are happy to pay the price. I had a friend in that situation. The mother of his kid not only poisoned him, but poisoned his girlfriend and buried her in the barn. She's now living in prison, but only because he woke up before it was too late. I've worked murder cases of folks killed by family members. Many people seem to think politicians are their family members or best friends, and trust them no matter what. That's insane. What 9/11 does is wake folks up, to start opening their eyes and see the corruption that's all around them. Maybe even look at their own corruption. For that reason, 9/11 was a bargain for only 6,000 officially dead, so far. Not counting 600,000 murdered Iraqis since 200? 9/11 revealed the real enemy of USA are the Judeofascists, AshkeNazis and ZioNazis. There's no such animal as Islamofascist.
Friday, November 9, 2007 12:53 PM
Sunday, November 11, 2007 4:06 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Fremdfirma: By the way - I sincerely hope no one thought I was kidding about the stupidity of our security folks chasing food purchases. Didn't wanna reveal certain of how I got the info, but since it's now *officially* "outed"... http://cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=hsnews-000002620892 Your tax dollars at work, folks.
Quote:US car theft rings probed for ties to Iraq bombings www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2005/10/02/us_car_theft_rings_probed_for_ties_to_iraq_bombings/ Carlyle Group now world's largest towing company www.thecarlylegroup.com/eng/portfolio/portfoliol5-3295.html Affidavit of Probable Cause for Criminal Complaint proves tow truckers run worldwide cartheft chopshop business in cahoots with crooked cops www.piratenews.org/affidavit-criminal-complaint13jun05.htm
Monday, November 12, 2007 1:03 AM
Tuesday, November 13, 2007 8:46 AM
Tuesday, November 13, 2007 9:13 AM
FLETCH2
Tuesday, November 13, 2007 12:12 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Fletch2: Here's the thing I don't get. This board has a set of firefly type pictures to be used as avatars. Mainly these are shots of our big damned crew but there are a few extras like Badger and Niska for variety. So PN answer me this. Out of all these potential pics why did you chose the one that. 1) Is the most Ayrian "nazi" looking and 2) looks like a wide eyed crazy person? Are you getting meta with us or something?
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL