REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

the real reason to oppose Hillary

POSTED BY: NEWOLDBROWNCOAT
UPDATED: Friday, January 4, 2008 12:28
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 698
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, January 3, 2008 7:53 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


just found this on the CNN political ticker:

Quote:


Supreme Court Justice Bill Clinton?
Posted: 11:52 AM ET

Would President Hillary name Bill to the Supreme Court?

WASHINGTON (CNN) — It is a title that would be sure to bring either fear or cheer to many Americans, depending on your political leanings: Supreme Court Justice Bill Clinton.

That provocative possibility has long been whispered in legal and political circles ever since Sen. Hillary Clinton became a viable candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination. Now a respected conservative law professor has openly predicted a future President Clinton would name her husband to the high court if a vacancy occurred.

Pepperdine Law School's Douglas Kmiec said, "The former president would be intrigued by court service and many would cheer him on."

Kmiec worked in the Reagan and Bush 41 White Houses as a top lawyer, but said he has no personal or political "disdain" for Bill Clinton.

CNN talked with several political and legal analysts of both ideological stripes, and while several laughed at the possibility, none would rule it out completely. And all those who spoke did so on background only.

There is precedent for such a nomination: William Howard Taft, who called his time as chief justice, from 1921 to 1930, the most rewarding of his career. He was president from 1909 to 1913.



Hey, they do have a lot of interns at the SupremeCourt.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, January 3, 2008 8:07 AM

RIGHTEOUS9



I think she's too saavy to ever do that. Looks bad nominating her own husband...Republicans would go to town on her for less...he won't get a seat, republicans will fillibuster his nomination...

and whether or not it was fair that it ever happened, Clinton was disbarred, and personally I think it smacks of bad taste to nominate somebody in such circumstances, something I wouldn't be in disagreement with when the manufactured vitriol starts rolling, and another reason I don't think Clinton would try this. bill doesn't need it, and they can find somebody who will do the same thing for them, who is more palletable to the republicans. They are good at making those kinds of consessions, unfortunately good.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, January 3, 2008 8:14 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"Hey, they do have a lot of interns at the Supreme Court."

Yeah, I'm sure Anita Hill has a lot of information on how that went with Uncle Clarence Tom.

http://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Hill

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, January 3, 2008 8:35 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Isn't her being a corporate whore enough of a reason to be against her?

Oh, wait.... that would eliminate 99% of Republicans and about 90% Democrats.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, January 3, 2008 11:18 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Isn't her being a corporate whore enough of a reason to be against her?


I don't think you can call her that. There's nothing "corporate" about her whoring.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, January 3, 2008 11:45 AM

KIRKULES


I think it's more likely Hillary will make Bill the ambassador to some distant country. Probably Thailand, at his request.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, January 3, 2008 11:30 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Isn't her being a corporate whore enough of a reason to be against her?

Oh, wait.... that would eliminate 99% of Republicans and about 90% Democrats.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.




LOL.... the 9% difference you speak about is just those savvy enough to con you because they have great PR departments that advertize when they give charitable donations.

Crooks and conmen on either side, distributed equally.

"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 4, 2008 4:33 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


6ix- I know you're a cynical guy, but there are some Dems with (what I would consider to be) consistently good voting records: People who voted against the Iraq invasion, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act and so forth. There are a few- but fewer- Republicans like that too. Don't throw them out.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 4, 2008 5:10 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


I thought just the fact that she had Vince Foster killed would be enough for most folks.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 4, 2008 10:52 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Ouch Kirk..just ouch.. that'd be funnier if it weren't so true.

I can sum up my essential opposition to Billary in four words.
"For your own good."

That is the worst of all Tyrannies.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 4, 2008 12:28 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Frem- Too true.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
MAGA movement
Sun, November 24, 2024 05:04 - 14 posts
Will Your State Regain It's Representation Next Decade?
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:53 - 113 posts
Any Conservative Media Around?
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:44 - 170 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sun, November 24, 2024 03:40 - 42 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sun, November 24, 2024 01:01 - 18 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, November 23, 2024 23:46 - 4761 posts
Australia - unbelievable...
Sat, November 23, 2024 19:59 - 22 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, November 23, 2024 19:33 - 4796 posts
More Cope: David Brooks and PBS are delusional...
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:32 - 1 posts
List of States/Governments/Politicians Moving to Ban Vaccine Passports
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:27 - 168 posts
Once again... a request for legitimate concerns...
Sat, November 23, 2024 16:22 - 17 posts
What's wrong with conspiracy theories
Sat, November 23, 2024 15:07 - 19 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL