REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Turns out it was all just hot air...

POSTED BY: HERO
UPDATED: Friday, April 18, 2008 17:13
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2712
PAGE 1 of 2

Friday, April 4, 2008 3:26 AM

HERO


Global warming 'dips this year'

By Roger Harrabin
BBC News environment analyst



Global temperatures will drop slightly this year as a result of the cooling effect of the La Nina current in the Pacific, UN meteorologists have said.

The World Meteorological Organization's secretary-general, Michel Jarraud, told the BBC it was likely that La Nina would continue into the summer.

This would mean global temperatures have not risen since 1998, prompting some to question climate change theory.

But experts say we are still clearly in a long-term warming trend - and they forecast a new record high temperature within five years.

The WMO points out that the decade from 1998 to 2007 was the warmest on record. Since the beginning of the 20th Century, the global average surface temperature has risen by 0.74C.

Rises 'stalled'


LA NINA KEY FACTS
La Nina translates from the Spanish as "The Child Girl"
Refers to the extensive cooling of the central and eastern Pacific
Increased sea temperatures on the western side of the Pacific mean the atmosphere has more energy and frequency of heavy rain and thunderstorms is increased
Typically lasts for up to 12 months and generally less damaging event than the stronger El Nino

La Nina and El Nino are two great natural Pacific currents whose effects are so huge they resonate round the world.

El Nino warms the planet when it happens; La Nina cools it. This year, the Pacific is in the grip of a powerful La Nina.

It has contributed to torrential rains in Australia and to some of the coldest temperatures in memory in snow-bound parts of China.

Mr Jarraud told the BBC that the effect was likely to continue into the summer, depressing temperatures globally by a fraction of a degree.

This would mean that temperatures have not risen globally since 1998 when El Nino warmed the world.

Watching trends

A minority of scientists question whether this means global warming has peaked and argue the Earth has proved more resilient to greenhouse gases than predicted.

But Mr Jarraud insisted this was not the case and noted that 2008 temperatures would still be well above average for the century.

"When you look at climate change you should not look at any particular year," he said. "You should look at trends over a pretty long period and the trend of temperature globally is still very much indicative of warming.

"La Nina is part of what we call 'variability'. There has always been and there will always be cooler and warmer years, but what is important for climate change is that the trend is up; the climate on average is warming even if there is a temporary cooling because of La Nina."

Adam Scaife, lead scientist for Modelling Climate Variability at the Hadley Centre in Exeter, UK, said their best estimate for 2008 was about 0.4C above the 1961-1990 average, and higher than this if you compared it with further back in the 20th Century.

Mr Scaife told the BBC: "What's happened now is that La Nina has come along and depressed temperatures slightly but these changes are very small compared to the long-term climate change signal, and in a few years time we are confident that the current record temperature of 1998 will be beaten when the La Nina has ended."


H


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 4, 2008 3:37 AM

JONGSSTRAW


What are you talkin' about?

Ted Turner, maybe the #2 guy in the Global Bowel Movement behind Gore is going around now on TV saying that all crops are going to fail in 20-40 years, and that humanity will be reduced to cannibalism. Isn't it against the law, or at least highly in-appropriate to abuse the mentally ill for political and capital gain? Can I, as a concerned citizen, file a suit against CNN & PBS for exploiting Mr. Turner's dementia in public?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 4, 2008 4:10 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


You must belong to the Auraptor School of Economic Analysis. Ignore the fact that any parameter in a complex system experiences variation, grab the ONE stat you can find that backs your viewpoint, ignore everything else, and blow your ass online.

Good one!

I can go to work feeling amused!

---------------------------------
Let's party like it's 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 4, 2008 8:50 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Ignore the fact that any parameter in a complex system experiences variation, grab the ONE stat you can find that backs your viewpoint, ignore everything else, and blow your ass online.


I would think that perhaps the most important stat in global warming is temperature.

Since 1998 this has become a crisis yet there is no actual warming during that period. Thats like taking shelter from a storm that does not exist.

I also note that global cooling was a major crisis in the late 1970s and the 1930s...

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 4, 2008 9:24 AM

RIGHTEOUS9



Holy shit, seriously, the issue of global warming is settled....even the people who say we aren't at fault aren't saying it isn't happening. I thought you weren't a religious man Hero, but here you are, going against the current of science, in favor of dogmatic certainty, again. What is it about this topic that you so consistently feel compelled to convolute the facts with your common "sense?"




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 4, 2008 9:35 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Since 1998 this has become a crisis yet there is no actual warming during that period. Thats like taking shelter from a storm that does not exist.
Did you actually read the article that you posted? it said
Quote:

The WMO points out that the decade from 1998 to 2007 was the warmest on record. Since the beginning of the 20th Century, the global average surface temperature has risen by 0.74C. ... Adam Scaife, lead scientist for Modelling Climate Variability at the Hadley Centre in Exeter, UK, said their best estimate for 2008 was about 0.4C above the 1961-1990 average, and higher than this if you compared it with further back in the 20th Century.


http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2007/






---------------------------------
Let's party like it's 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 4, 2008 11:33 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

Since 1998 this has become a crisis yet there is no actual warming during that period. Thats like taking shelter from a storm that does not exist.
Did you actually read the article that you posted? it said
Quote:

The WMO points out that the decade from 1998 to 2007 was the warmest on record. Since the beginning of the 20th Century, the global average surface temperature has risen by 0.74C. ... Adam Scaife, lead scientist for Modelling Climate Variability at the Hadley Centre in Exeter, UK, said their best estimate for 2008 was about 0.4C above the 1961-1990 average, and higher than this if you compared it with further back in the 20th Century.


http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2007/






---------------------------------
Let's party like it's 1929.



Yeah, was wondering about that myself.

Apparently, he just read the first line, though "This'll show those libruls", and posted it without even noticing that the actual body of the text refutes him.

I have to assume, Hero, that you are not so incompetant in court. You apparently didn't even get to the forth sentence:

Quote:

But experts say we are still clearly in a long-term warming trend - and they forecast a new record high temperature within five years.


Thanks for making it easy to poke holes in your post, though.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 4, 2008 12:44 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Righteous9:

Holy shit, seriously, the issue of global warming is settled....even the people who say we aren't at fault aren't saying it isn't happening. I thought you weren't a religious man Hero, but here you are, going against the current of science, in favor of dogmatic certainty, again. What is it about this topic that you so consistently feel compelled to convolute the facts with your common "sense?"






Those who say we aren't at fault are also saying there's nothing to worry about, and that nothing we do will influence the climate , either way. Science doesn't side w/ the ' man made global warming' crowd, never has. So why even try to bring science into the equation?

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 4, 2008 6:27 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
So why even try to bring science into the equation?




Because it's better than sticking our fingers in our ears and saying "Nya Nya, I can't hear you" like you and others do.

I'll take science over rationalizing or self-denial any day.

Besides, I though you wingnuts stick to the "the science isn't conclusive" meme? It can say it's not man-made if it's inconclusive. Can't have it both ways, Rappy.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 4, 2008 7:43 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Righteous9:
Holy shit, seriously, the issue of global warming is settled....even the people who say we aren't at fault aren't saying it isn't happening.

It is far from being settled.

I haven't seen any compelling evidence that proves global warming is happening. It doesn't mean it isn't happening, but I have yet to see proof. I still have way too many questions to say the issue is "settled."

If you are very confident of the evidence, perhaps you can help answer my questions. I would appreciate it.

http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=18&t=27459&m=475215

--------------------------
Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt.
-- Richard Feynman

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 5, 2008 5:25 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
So why even try to bring science into the equation?




Because it's better than sticking our fingers in our ears and saying "Nya Nya, I can't hear you" like you and others do.

I'll take science over rationalizing or self-denial any day.

Besides, I though you wingnuts stick to the "the science isn't conclusive" meme? It can say it's not man-made if it's inconclusive. Can't have it both ways, Rappy.



Yes, we I can have it both ways, because it's inconclusive. Your default position is that ANY change is "man made " , when in fact that hasn't been proven. And I enjoy you wingnuts calling US the wingnuts. That truly is precious.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 5, 2008 12:53 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
So why even try to bring science into the equation?




Because it's better than sticking our fingers in our ears and saying "Nya Nya, I can't hear you" like you and others do.

I'll take science over rationalizing or self-denial any day.

Besides, I though you wingnuts stick to the "the science isn't conclusive" meme? It can say it's not man-made if it's inconclusive. Can't have it both ways, Rappy.



Yes, we I can have it both ways, because it's inconclusive. Your default position is that ANY change is "man made " , when in fact that hasn't been proven. And I enjoy you wingnuts calling US the wingnuts. That truly is precious.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "



No, my default position is "play it safe, just in case". Besides, I don't see a cleaner enviornment as having a down side if it's not true.

And no, you can't have it both ways, unless you are being a total hipocrit. You can't say there's nothing conclusive - and then state a difinitive conclusion, dipshit.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 5, 2008 4:53 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

No, my default position is "play it safe, just in case". Besides, I don't see a cleaner enviornment as having a down side if it's not true.

And no, you can't have it both ways, unless you are being a total hipocrit. You can't say there's nothing conclusive - and then state a difinitive conclusion, dipshit.



Yes, you can have it both ways, and I'll leave off the childish profane insult. Since we don't know if/ how man has any role in rising temps, we can conclusively say that we don't know what effect, if any , cutting our 'carbon footprint' will do for the planet.

Face it. You being wrong is no reason for me to resort to calling you all sorts of childish names, now is it ?


It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 5, 2008 5:05 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"Science doesn't side w/ the ' man made global warming' crowd, never has."

It doesn't ? Do you have any proof of that ? Or are you just talking out of your butt, again ?

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 5, 2008 7:15 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


See, Rap belongs to the Auraptor School of Economic Analysis. It's proven so gratifying he's now applying the fact-free approach to everything else!

---------------------------------
Let's party like it's 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 5, 2008 9:16 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Since we don't know if/ how man has any role in rising temps, we can conclusively say that we don't know what effect, if any , cutting our 'carbon footprint' will do for the planet.




But that is not what you said. You said that we were not having a effect on the enviornment. You got called on your double-speak, and once again, danced danced danced your way around the issue.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 3:19 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
No, my default position is "play it safe, just in case". Besides, I don't see a cleaner enviornment as having a down side if it's not true.


No new factories, oil refineries, power plants...not to mention throwing coal miners, loggers, and related service workers out of their jobs. Higher taxes, higher unemployments, higher energy costs, inflation, fire, flood, disease, animal overpopulation, bad TV (did you see 'Green Week' on NBC), turning off City lights for no reason, having to listen to AlGore, feeling guilty for dumping oil down the sewer, recycling (its a pain), treehuggers, Greenpeace, crazy folks burning down my new expensive house, and lastly...I miss coke in a glass bottle.

"No new factories, oil refineries, power plants"- this is silly, if we built new ones they'd be cleaner and more efficient then ones built prior to 1980, and we could start phasing out the older ones.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 7:01 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
No, my default position is "play it safe, just in case". Besides, I don't see a cleaner enviornment as having a down side if it's not true.


No new factories, oil refineries, power plants...not to mention throwing coal miners, loggers, and related service workers out of their jobs. Higher taxes, higher unemployments, higher energy costs, inflation, fire, flood, disease, animal overpopulation, bad TV (did you see 'Green Week' on NBC), turning off City lights for no reason, having to listen to AlGore, feeling guilty for dumping oil down the sewer, recycling (its a pain), treehuggers, Greenpeace, crazy folks burning down my new expensive house, and lastly...I miss coke in a glass bottle.



New energy sources would have to be utilized, which would cover the jobs angle. The rest is just hysterical bullshit.

Quote:

"No new factories, oil refineries, power plants"- this is silly, if we built new ones they'd be cleaner and more efficient then ones built prior to 1980, and we could start phasing out the older ones.

H



That would be preferable to the current "No, no, no, I'm not gonna listen" form of denail so many are in.



"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 10:52 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


So, by using your "scientific" methods, whereby you constantly point out single incidents as proof of an overall trend, or disproof of climate change, let me offer this "proof".

A couple years ago, Austin, Texas recorded the highest temperature EVER recorded in the city or the area - 114 degrees Fahrenheit. I offer that as absolute, incontrovertible proof that global warming exists.

Hey, it's as valid as anything you've ever offered in the other direction...



Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence[sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

I can't help the sinking feeling that my country is now being run by people who read "1984" not as a cautionary tale, but rather as an instruction manual. - Michael Mock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 10:55 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
See, Rap belongs to the Auraptor School of Economic Analysis. It's proven so gratifying he's now applying the fact-free approach to everything else!

---------------------------------
Let's party like it's 1929.



No, 'Rap is following his idol, that other dipshit, Ronald Reagan, who said, and I quote:

"Facts are stupid things."



Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence[sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

I can't help the sinking feeling that my country is now being run by people who read "1984" not as a cautionary tale, but rather as an instruction manual. - Michael Mock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 11:05 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


I'd like to have the source for that Reagan quote, and the context.

Conversely, I am fact based, not fact challenged, as y'all are.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 11:21 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I am fact based, not fact challenged, as y'all are.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Good one, AU!!! Glad I wasn't drinkin' soda just then!!! *wipes tear from eye*

The climate's changin'. Maybe mostly a natural cycle...maybe man-hurried...but the facts are undeniable. It's gonna be a bumpy ride, and I'm prepared- are YOU?



Weather-proofing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 11:24 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I'd like to have the source for that Reagan quote, and the context.


Quote:

Reagan was quoting John Adams' well-known quotation, facts are stubborn things. He certainly knew the correct words--it was a simple misstatement--but it makes a funny quote in its own right.


There ya goisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 11:38 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I'd like to have the source for that Reagan quote, and the context.




Ask, and ye shall receive...

"Facts are stupid things." –Spoken by Ronald Wilson Reagan at the 1988 Republican National Convention, attempting to quote John Adams, who said, "Facts are stubborn things".




Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence[sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

I can't help the sinking feeling that my country is now being run by people who read "1984" not as a cautionary tale, but rather as an instruction manual. - Michael Mock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 1:53 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I am fact based, not fact challenged, as y'all are.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Good one, AU!!! Glad I wasn't drinkin' soda just then!!! *wipes tear from eye*

The climate's changin'. Maybe mostly a natural cycle...maybe man-hurried...but the facts are undeniable. It's gonna be a bumpy ride, and I'm prepared- are YOU?




The climate's ALWAYS changin', which explains why we have ancient human dwellings in caves beneath the waves in the carribean, and marine fossils in Kansas.

Glad you find facts so funny, Chris.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 1:56 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I'd like to have the source for that Reagan quote, and the context.




Ask, and ye shall receive...

"Facts are stupid things." –Spoken by Ronald Wilson Reagan at the 1988 Republican National Convention, attempting to quote John Adams, who said, "Facts are stubborn things".




Mike



Well, we can give Ronnie a pass on that one, seeing how he was busy saving the entire human race from thermo nuclear war, what w/ defeating the Soviets and all. At least Reagan knew who John Adams was, unlike Algore.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 7, 2008 3:33 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:


Well, we can give Ronnie a pass on that one...



Shocker!

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 8, 2008 8:57 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Glad you find facts so funny, Chris.


We ALL take facts, process 'em in our heads, run 'em through our particular life-experience-filters, and then come up with a perception of reality. I, for one, am unfit to say I know the COMPLETE score on everything (or ANYTHING, for that matter). We must all be prepared to re-examine our beliefs at a moment's notice, otherwise the only thing we can be reasonably certain of is that our perception is most probably self-serving & incorrect.

That's the facts, Jackisall



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2008 6:19 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Well, we can give Ronnie a pass on that one, seeing how he was busy saving the entire human race from thermo nuclear war, what w/ defeating the Soviets and all. At least Reagan knew who John Adams was, unlike Algore.



Well, isn't that convenient? Of course, once again, and as usual, you're assuming facts not in evidence - dangerous territory for a "fact based" life form (or biped) such as yourself, eh?

What's your source and context to prove that Reagan had any idea who John Adams was, or that Al Gore doesn't?

"Saving the entire race from thermo nuclear war?" Seriously? When during Reagan's time in office were we under imminent threat of nuclear attack, other than the time he stated that we'd begin bombing in five minutes?

By your litmus test, Kennedy must get a pass on that whole bullet-catching incident, as well as everything else he did, since he'd been busy saving the planet from thermonuclear war, too.




Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence[sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

I can't help the sinking feeling that my country is now being run by people who read "1984" not as a cautionary tale, but rather as an instruction manual. - Michael Mock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:48 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
What's your source and context to prove that Reagan had any idea who John Adams was, or that Al Gore doesn't?


http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1988/081588b.htm
Quote:


Before we came to Washington, Americans had just suffered the two worst back-to-back years of inflation in 60 years. Those are the facts, and as John Adams said, ``Facts are stubborn things.'' Interest rates had jumped to over 21 percent, the highest in 120 years, more than doubling the average monthly mortgage payments for working families -- our families. When they sat around the kitchen table, it was not to plan summer vacations, it was to plan economic survival. Facts are stubborn things.


See there, he quotes one of Adams most famous speeches.

I suspect AlGore knows all to well who Adams is but is less then familiar with facts. His climate change routinely ignores the facts and evidence that global warming, like global cooling, is simply not happening. I've cited numerous articles from the 1930s on where about every ten years they claim in bold headlines either 'GLOBAL WARMING' or 'GLOBAL COOLING' when in fact its no hotter or colder now then it was ten or even 100 years ago. The only inconvienant truth AlGore has ever stumbled across is the fact his book and theories belong in the fiction section of the bookstore.


That said, I enourage everyone to watch the John Adams mini-series on HBO...its really good. Episode 2, where they proclaim independence, is particularly well acted.

H


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:56 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
What's your source and context to prove that Reagan had any idea who John Adams was, or that Al Gore doesn't?


Here's an excerpt from a 1985 interview with the Times of London...in case you thought the other one just proved that Reagan's speech writer knew who John Adams was:
Quote:


Q: During your talks with Mrs. Thatcher in February you referred to the special quality of relations between the U.S. and Britain. What are these special qualities?

The President: In a few weeks, it will be the 200th anniversary of the date on which John Adams was received by King George III and diplomatic relations were established between the United Kingdom and the United States. With a few exceptions, the two centuries which followed have been marked by a growing closeness between our two countries. Our nations have been drawn together by common traditions and heritage and a common devotion to the concepts of liberty and human dignity. These bonds have been forged over the centuries as our countries have stood together to meet both the challenges of war and the opportunities of peace. Today relations between Great Britain and the United States are marked not only by cooperation and mutual respect but also by a deep and abiding friendship.


A lot of people make the assumption that Ronald Reagan was some kind of senile old fool. He was in fact a very smart and capable man who was afflicted by a terrible disease at the end of a distinguished career in public service.

While it is easy to disagree with his politics, one can still respect him for who he was at his best. An accomplished actor, a father, a husband, and a political leader. In all of those he displayed both successes and failures and that like the circumstances of his illness simply make him all the more human, one worthy of our respect if not admiration.

AlGore, however, is half tree and half spotted owl and probably deserves to be stuffed and mounted (like he was during the first seven years of the Clinton Presidency). I thought he looked good with a beard though...

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:39 AM

BROWNCOAT2007


*snickers* Global Warming exsists, as does Global Cooling... I live in Minnesota, and it's been the COLDEST winter we have had in the past 10-15 YEARS, yeah... Global Warming exsists, but it is a naturally occuring part of a cycle... not some crazy end-of-the-world sh*t that Gore wishes it to be

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:33 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
I've cited numerous articles from the 1930s on where about every ten years they claim in bold headlines either 'GLOBAL WARMING' or 'GLOBAL COOLING' when in fact its no hotter or colder now then it was ten or even 100 years ago.



Wow, you'd sound a lot less retarded saying something like that, if you hadn't started this thread by posting an article that claims

"But experts say we are still clearly in a long-term warming trend - and they forecast a new record high temperature within five years.

The WMO points out that the decade from 1998 to 2007 was the warmest on record."


I assume, that when you are in court, you actually look at the evidence before introducing it. I hope so, because here, you totally dropped the ball.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:48 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Well, we can give Ronnie a pass on that one, seeing how he was busy saving the entire human race from thermo nuclear war, what w/ defeating the Soviets and all. At least Reagan knew who John Adams was, unlike Algore.



Well, isn't that convenient? Of course, once again, and as usual, you're assuming facts not in evidence - dangerous territory for a "fact based" life form (or biped) such as yourself, eh?

What's your source and context to prove that Reagan had any idea who John Adams was, or that Al Gore doesn't?

Well, I was around when Reagan was in office, so I know how smart he was. Also, I saw a video of AlGore asking who the bust of the founding fathers were when he was touring Monticello , I believe. Pretty funny stuff. Wish I could find a link.

Quote:



"Saving the entire race from thermo nuclear war?" Seriously? When during Reagan's time in office were we under imminent threat of nuclear attack, other than the time he stated that we'd begin bombing in five minutes?

Reagan starred down the Russian Bear and broke it's back. Note the fall of the Berlin Wal. Reagan's doing, thank you very much.

Quote:



By your litmus test, Kennedy must get a pass on that whole bullet-catching incident, as well as everything else he did, since he'd been busy saving the planet from thermonuclear war, too.

Mike





Kennedy showed more moxie in his finger than all the Lib Dems of today combined.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:32 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Conversely, I am fact based, not fact challenged, as y'all are.
This is your first factual error....
Quote:

Well, I was around when Reagan was in office, so I know how smart he was.
Hey, guess what?
ME TOO!

I know how smart he was, too! I even recall the joke that was going around at the time: Didja here the one about the RR typewriter? It has no memory and no colon!

See? My facts are better'n yours! More specific, and funnier.

(BTW- Do you recall when the Challenger blew up?)

---------------------------------
Let's party like it's 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2008 3:40 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

Conversely, I am fact based, not fact challenged, as y'all are.
This is your first factual error....
Quote:

Well, I was around when Reagan was in office, so I know how smart he was.
Hey, guess what?
ME TOO!

I know how smart he was, too! I even recall the joke that was going around at the time: Didja here the one about the RR typewriter? It has no memory and no colon!

See? My facts are better'n yours! More specific, and funnier.

(BTW- Do you recall when the Challenger blew up?)





That joke wasn't funny then nor is it now. I know exactly where I was when the Challenger blew up. Reagan gave one of his most moving speeches ever that day.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2008 3:51 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"Reagan gave one of his most moving speeches ever that day."

Are you under some misconception that he wrote that speech ? B/c in fact, he was just acting a script given to him by other people.


***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 10, 2008 5:55 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Reagan gave one of his most moving speeches ever that day.
Reagan was to give the SOTUS that day. It was ONLY under considerable pressure that he delayed it for a week. AFA the joke: clearly, there were concerns about Reagan's memory even then. He was not a "brilliant" man taken "later" by Alzheimer's.

---------------------------------
Let's party like it's 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 1:12 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

Reagan gave one of his most moving speeches ever that day.
. He was not a "brilliant" man taken "later" by Alzheimer's.

---------------------------------
Let's party like it's 1929.




He most certainly was. Understand , I'm not comparing him to William F. Buckley Jr , or Stephen Hawking , but Reagan was wiser and smarter than most.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 3:30 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
He was not a "brilliant" man taken "later" by Alzheimer's.


Why does a man have to be brilliant?

He had a degree in Economics, was a veteran (they also serve who make movies for the Air Corps), was accomplished in his field (acting), highly respected by his acting peers, managed his money well, entered a second career (politics) and rose to the top. Politics aside, as a man he is worthy of respect. He was later afflicted by a terrible disease.

I don't see how you can attack any of that. Its ok to disagree with the man's politics without hating the man. I hated Clinton's politics, but as a fella, he wasn't the worst and I admire what he accomplished on a professional level. Sure, I'd not trust him in a room with my little sister or loan money to the man, but aside from that he was just as good and bad as anybody else.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 3:43 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:


Its ok to disagree with the man's politics without hating the man. I hated Clinton's politics, but as a fella, he wasn't the worst and I admire what he accomplished on a professional level. Sure, I'd not trust him in a room with my little sister or loan money to the man, but aside from that he was just as good and bad as anybody else.


Not tryin' to cause anyone a heart attack here, but I agree with Hero on this- there is much to respect concerning Reagan...and it took GW to make that clear to me...


More towards the middle Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 4:23 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
I agree with Hero on this- there is much to respect concerning Reagan...and it took GW to make that clear to me...


It was a moving speech. I'm glad to see you give President Bush some due credit.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/06/20040611-2.html
Quote:


Now, death has done all that death can do. And as Ronald Wilson Reagan goes his way, we are left with the joyful hope he shared. In his last years, he saw through a glass darkly. Now he sees his Savior face to face.

And we look to that fine day when we will see him again, all weariness gone, clear of mind, strong and sure, and smiling again, and the sorrow of his parting gone forever.

May God bless Ronald Reagan, and the country he loved.


When I took the name Hero, Ronald Reagan was the man I was thinking of...

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 4:28 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:

It was a moving speech. I'm glad to see you give President Bush some due credit.

Err..no, I meant it took a President as bad as Bush to make me realize just how good a President & a man Reagan was....
The speech (eulogy) was fine, but GW had it written for him.

Clarifying Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 9:55 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
The speech (eulogy) was fine, but GW had it written for him.


So the only good singers are the ones who write their own music. Not a big figure skating fan (cause you know...its all done by a choreographer). Your mom's a terrible cook cause she uses a recipe she got from you grandmother.

From what I understand about Bush is that for big speeches like this he puts his ideas onto paper, gives it to the speechwriter, who polishes it into a speech, then back to the President for revision. Thats how he did his address to Congress after 9/11 which I still say is his best speech.

Reagan's speech writer worked closely with Reagan to get a feel for 'how he sounds' so that he could write for him. He was much more inner circle then we've seen since then. His book was really interesting.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 10:14 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:

From what I understand about Bush is that for big speeches like this he puts his ideas onto paper,

In crayon...
Quote:

gives it to the speechwriter
Who basically, er, WRITES it...

Har har Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 2:29 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:

From what I understand about Bush is that for big speeches like this he puts his ideas onto paper,

In crayon...
Quote:

gives it to the speechwriter
Who basically, er, WRITES it...

Har har Chrisisall





If you read Bush's speech at the Reagan funeral, you'll notice that not ONCE does W ever utter the word " I " in reference to himself. In contrast, compare Clinton's speech at Coretta Scott King's funeral, or ANY big speech that Clinton's ever given. You'll find his speech littered with " I " this and " I " that, as if folks had come to hear how Mrs King's death affected Clinton, instead of him offering words of praise for the dearly departed civil rights leader. It truly is amazing.

eg - quote from Clinton's eulogy for Rosa Parks

" "I remember as if it were yesterday, that fateful day 50 years ago. I was a 9-year-old southern white boy who rode on a segregated bus every single day of my life."
"
There is only one, small problem with his story. Where he was raised and lived until he was in first grade, Hope, Ark., doesn't have public transportation – and never has. Well perhaps it was in Hot Springs that he remembers vividly riding the bus every day of that life. The problem there is that Hot Springs only got public transportation 26 years ago.

OOOPS!



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 2:49 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Rap

"He most certainly was. Understand , I'm not comparing him to William F. Buckley Jr , or Stephen Hawking , but Reagan was wiser and smarter than most."

Not smart enough to write the speeches you liked so much, or smart enough to create the policies. He was, at most, the face of a background group. Even then he was suffering from early Alzheimer's and it took a phalanx of 'handlers' and a 'hearing aid' to make him look at least normal.

BTW, what is it about you that you can only admire severely brain-damaged people like Reagan and GW Bush ?

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 3:01 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Rap

"He most certainly was. Understand , I'm not comparing him to William F. Buckley Jr , or Stephen Hawking , but Reagan was wiser and smarter than most."

Not smart enough to write the speeches you liked so much, or smart enough to create the policies. He was, at most, the face of a background group. Even then he was suffering from early Alzheimer's and it took a phalanx of 'handlers' and a 'hearing aid' to make him look at least normal.

BTW, what is it about you that you can only admire severely brain-damaged people like Reagan and GW Bush ?

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."



The myth that Reagan needed 'handlers' or that he didn't write his own speeches , at least have a hand in writing them, has been debunked time and time again. Case in point, thee 1987 speech at the Brandenberg Gate. While Reagan did suffer from Alzheimer's in his latter years, there's nothing to indicate he suffered until his 2nd term. And as for W, there's nothing to indicate that he's is in any way impaired. You not liking his politics is not proof that he's 'brain damaged' , so sorry.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 3:32 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


SPEECH WRITING


And as I looked out at them I thought of the most unsung hero of all. His name was Bentley Elliott. He went by Ben. He ran Ronald Reagan's speechwriting department from 1982 through 1986. He hired most of the speechwriters. He shaped and refined Ronald Reagan's speeches, directing themes and approach. He was a great writer. Ronald Reagan said a lot of famous things, and he said them in part because Ben Elliott got them past the bureaucracy, past the powerful so-called pragmatists, so Reagan could consider them, rewrite them, underscore them. But Ben is the one who got the draft to him.

EARLY ALZHEIMER'S

There is ample precedent for papering over presidents' medical shortcomings. Stanford Medical School professor Herbert Abrams and others have argued that Ronald Reagan was incapacitated from the day he was shot in March of 1981 through the succeeding seven years of his presidency. In their 1988 book, "Landslide," Jane Mayer and Doyle McManus report that one White House staffer considered Reagan's condition so bad in 1987 that he suggested invoking the transfer-of-power provisions of the 25th Amendment.




The hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease include the inability to retain and recall autobiographical details, such as the marriage of a child or the death of a relative. Another is the inability to remember a source of information. One of the first indicators that Ronald Reagan was experiencing cognitive changes came as early as the 1980 presidential campaign, when he told the story of a heroic pilot whose plane had gone down in flames, reciting it as though it was a true story when in fact it had been a part of a movie he had seen.




I may have told you why I think Reagan had Alzheimer's while he was president. During his presidency they took him on a tour of the concentration camps. He said to the press and his staff, "I know I 've been here before." What I knew is he never left Culver City (when the concentration camps were liberated). But Ronnie then recited shot by shot what he had seen on film (5 May 1985). He was in a state of shock and he never recovered. Can you imagine how embarrassed how the press was and his staff? They couldn't tell the public, listen, your sitting president is hallucinating.

When I saw it on the news, I said, poor guy, he's lost it. Two people told me they interviewed him when he was President and they had the feeling he had early Alzheimer's. One was a woman named Ann Sperber. She was doing a book on Bogey and she went to interview Reagan.

She said, Mr. President, do you remember when you and Bogey worked together? He said, we used to play golf all the time. He couldn't remember the fact that in 1939, he was in a film called "Dark Victory" with Bette Davis and Bogart. And he kept being very evasive.

Later Edmund Morris, doing the official biography, said that when he asked him about the war year from '42 to '46, he was very evasive. He said, did I ever tell you about the time when John Wayne and I played golf? He just couldn't remember but he had to ad lib to cover up — this is while he was President.



***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 11, 2008 5:07 PM

FREMDFIRMA


I don't see all that much wrong with covering for a presidents health issues, so long as the veep is steadfast and policy is executed along the same focus efficiently - and that did happen under Reagan.

I might not have agreed with those policies mind you, but they did carry them in the direction Reagan intended them to be carried, it would not be the first time an administration has covered for the failing health of a president, either.

Might not have liked the guy too much, but I will say that even on his worst day, Ronnie was more than a mental match for what we got now.

And that's a damn sad thing, innit ?

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, November 28, 2024 17:10 - 4778 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:32 - 1163 posts
Trump, convicted of 34 felonies
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:10 - 45 posts
Salon: How to gather with grace after that election
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:04 - 1 posts
End of the world Peter Zeihan
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:59 - 215 posts
Another Putin Disaster
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:58 - 1540 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:46 - 650 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:41 - 4847 posts
Dubai goes bankrupt, kosher Rothschilds win the spoils
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:31 - 5 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:29 - 7515 posts
Jean-Luc Brunel, fashion mogul Peter Nygard linked to Epstein
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:27 - 14 posts
All things Space
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:17 - 270 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL