REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Whoops - Joe the Plumber Hasn't Paid His Taxes!

POSTED BY: KWICKO
UPDATED: Sunday, October 26, 2008 12:57
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 6914
PAGE 1 of 5

Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:12 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:



From the Houston Chronicle:

"Joe the Plumber," the Toledo, Ohio, man whose complaints about Barack Obama's tax plan were featured in the final presidential debate, owes the state of Ohio almost $1,200 in back income taxes.
According to records on file with the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, the state filed a tax lien against Samuel J. Wurzelbacher for $1,182.98 on Jan. 26, 2007, that is still active.



Read the whole story here:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/hotstories/6062246.html


Also, he says Obama tap-dances like Sammy Davis, Jr.

Quote:

In a phone interview with CBS' Katie Couric, Joe Wurzelbacher said Barack Obama "tap dance[d] ... almost as good as Sammy Davis Jr." in their conversation. He also said he didn't actually make enough to fall into the group whose taxes would be raised under Obama -- but argued that it was a "slippery slope."


Read this story here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/16/joe-the-plumber-obama-tap_n_1
35151.html


Also, turns out he's not even a licensed plumber.

Quote:

By Robert Barnes
Joe the Plumber is not exactly a plumber, he's "not even close" to making the kind of money that would result in higher taxes from Democrat Barack Obama's proposals and has such an aversion to taxes that a lien was filed against him by the state of Ohio.

Not all the attention has been welcomed. Wurzelbacher, 34, told the Associated Press that he was not a licensed plumber. Because he works for a small company that does residential work, he said, he doesn't need to be licensed.



Read that story here:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/16/joe_the_plumber_
not_a_licensed.html?hpid=topnews


Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

Trolls Against McCain!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:16 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


So Joe the Plumber is just another heart-warming right-wing story turned fraud, like Sarah Palin?

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:33 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


BUMP!

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:58 PM

DEADLOCKVICTIM



just heard on the evening news - Joe is not licensed to practice his trade in the state of Ohio...


btw..... i was a union pipe fitter for a short span.... the standing joke was that a plumber only needed to know three things,
1) shit runs downhill
2) don't chew your fingernails
and
3) payday is on Friday....


sage advice

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 16, 2008 2:59 PM

OUT2THEBLACK


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:



Also, he says Obama tap-dances like Sammy Davis, Jr.




It's just amazing how there's no limit to Barry's talents...

Does this mean we get to call him Obama-Sammy ?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 16, 2008 3:06 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by out2theblack:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:



Also, he says Obama tap-dances like Sammy Davis, Jr.




It's just amazing how there's no limit to Barry's talents...

Does this mean we get to call him Obama-Sammy ?



I think it means you get to call him "Mister President".


He can tap dance, and McCain can't even tie his shoes...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 3:18 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


It's a far cry from " not paying your taxes " to still owing a paultry $1,200 to the Gov't. This amount works out to less than a tip when he's already paid the rest of the bill. Leave it to the Left to distort and twist the facts.



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 3:22 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


"Joe the Plumber":

He's not a licensed plumber.
He makes $40,000 a year.
He's in no position to buy the business...
Which makes only $100,000 a year.
He's a Republican, and always has been.


In other words, the only true thing that he said about himself was his name. He's a Republican plant, and a fraud.


---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 3:28 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by deadlockvictim:

just heard on the evening news - Joe is not licensed to practice his trade in the state of Ohio...





So, a man does a job for 15 yrs, and some how YOU think the power of the state is necessary for him to do his job ? He's not a doctor, he's not dentist, nor a lawyer......he's a PLUMBER.
Hell, the state will make folks get licenses for cutting hair, if they think it'll raise more revenue. And that's all that licensing is , a racket to raise more $$ on the backs of people.





It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 3:31 AM

DEADLOCKVICTIM


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
...only true thing that he said about himself was his name.



ah, actually it's Sam

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 3:31 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
"Joe the Plumber":

He's not a licensed plumber.
He makes $40,000 a year.
He's in no position to buy the business...
Which makes only $100,000 a year.
He's a Republican, and always has been.


In other words, the only true thing that he said about himself was his name. He's a Republican plant, and a fraud.


---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.



Nothing about his is a fraud. He spoke truth. If he ever wants to buy his plumbing business, not today, but in a year or 2, what he said about Barak's tax plan is dead on accurate. It'll hurt him and penalize him if he tries to expand the business.

You see, some folks have ideas about the future which are greater than what they see in the present. It's called........wait for it.... HOPE!!!

Obama is for no hope.



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 4:21 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Yet another flim-flam faerytale from the right wing, what else did you expect ?

Btw - he's also Charles Keatings nephew, by marriage, so it's not like they picked him out of a hat, neither, and if you run down family ties and associations, it gets even more interesting.

Did they REALLY expect this guy to hold up against professional muckrakers, when even an amateur like me could out him in fifteen minutes ?

Pathetic.

-Frem
It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 4:28 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


I disagree.

Whatever his backround...Joe pointed something out.

Obama IS a socialist.

Socialism = BAD for America = Obama is likewise bad for America.

Im not a Republican so don't try it.

I just don't think I should have to pay for Shaniquanas 50 illigetimate, criminal kids.

Don't take MY money to shore up the failed housing in the ghettos/slums, or to "fix" the crime ridden "schools".

Likewise, don't dress up your socialist reperations, as taxes for helping the "poor".


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 4:40 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:

Socialism = BAD for America

News flash for ya, Wulfie, America has had strong Socialist leanings since, oh, before you were born...

Pure Democracy? Not gonna happen...this is a Republic which runs on Capitalism which is restrained from becoming completely feudal by Socialism.
See, any 'ism' taken to it's limits will result in totalitarianism of one kind or another, only a blend keeps us sorta free. You wanna reject Socialism out of hand? Cool. Go live in China.

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 4:51 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Actually, I would prefer a LIBERTARIAN society, Chris.

Where I am FREE to go my own way, WITHOUT having to baby the low people in our society.

Again, why should I give a rats fart about what happens to Moieshshanaquikquegs bastard children?

Don't care.

I don't believe in "raising" another group. It's impossible. Only THEY can do that for themselves.

So, again, dont take MY hard earned cashy money, to support LaQueefa and her brood, or Merle Haggard and his meth addiction.

I don't care what happens to the idiots and the scum. If they pull themselves out, great. if they crash and burn, JUST AS GREAT.

More room, air, and water for me.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 4:58 AM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
I disagree.

Whatever his backround...Joe pointed something out.

Obama IS a socialist.

Socialism = BAD for America = Obama is likewise bad for America.

Im not a Republican so don't try it.

I just don't think I should have to pay for Shaniquanas 50 illigetimate, criminal kids.

Don't take MY money to shore up the failed housing in the ghettos/slums, or to "fix" the crime ridden "schools".

Likewise, don't dress up your socialist reperations, as taxes for helping the "poor".


Jesus Christ, man--we already have corporate socialism in this country and have had for decades! Wealth redistribution UPWARD. People have been making jokes about Obama's "trickly up" economics, but we've had a river of money flowing thataway for a while now. So, it's evil for rich people to pay more for this system that made them rich and for the wars that the poor fight for them, but it's A-O-K for the poor and middle class to pay for the failed speculation and blunders of corporations and the banks because they have no concept of the word "responsibility." And why should they, if we'll continually pay for their mistakes?

And you have the stones to talke about poor people living off the system??? Dang man, no one gets rich on welfare in this country. No one can live off of unemployment benefits. All that crap about "Shaniquas" is a nasty racist lie started up by the Gipper to make paying taxes sound like paying for deadbeats. Taxes aren't paying for deadbeats, they pay for schools and bridges and wars. Do you REALLY think the government is pouring huge amounts of money into the "ghettos" as you call them? How the heck do you think they remain "ghettos?"

As Dr. Paul so ably pointed out this election cycle, inflation is taxation to bail out the rich. Obama's tax plan is a tiny gesture toward correcting that. Tiny.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 5:12 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Actually, I would prefer a LIBERTARIAN society, Chris.

Me too, actually.
Quote:



Where I am FREE to go my own way, WITHOUT having to baby the low people in our society.


This is typical NeoCon thinking, Wulf, you have to let go of it....true, peeps that play the system to get out of work exist, but don't let the few jerks paint it that way for everyone. Some peeps get a raw deal- bad parents, dead parents, missing limbs, and in our society, where we should all be our brother's keeper, we cannot let them fall, lest we fall ourselves. If we divide it up into us (the good ones) and them (the low ones), we automatically devalue ourselves, for WE could be someone else's them.

Either we're in this together, or it's every man for himself- get yer guns & head fer the hills!

Soapboxisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 5:12 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Again, in the same way that I don't want to pay for LaQueefa, I don't want to pay for Wall Street either.

STOP TAKING MY MONEY TO "HELP" THE FAILURES IN OUR SOCIETY.

Let them die off. Let Darwinism happen.

As an edit...I am NOT my brothers keeper, UNLESS I CHOOSE to be. If I CHOOSE to help my 'brother", thats my CHOICE.

Do not FORCE it on me.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 5:19 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
I don't want to pay for Wall Street either.

STOP TAKING MY MONEY TO "HELP" THE FAILURES IN OUR SOCIETY.

Let them die off.

They won't.
You and I will pay to keep certain peeps where they want to be, for our entire lives. That is the Golden Rule, my friend. And to blame your fellow man or woman around you is exactly the plan; don't fall for it, Wulf.

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 5:25 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


"You and I will pay to keep certain peeps where they want to be, for our entire lives."


That goes both up AND down the economic ladder.

Im sick of paying for the Wall Street fatcats in the same way Im sick of paying for the low scum.

If the playing field were fair, both of these types would have to actually work.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 5:37 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:



If the playing field were fair, both of these types would have to actually work.




The peeps that don't have to work are actually fewer than you think, bro. I personally know of like 10 peeps that use foodstamps to back up their druggie lifestyle...that's out of hundreds and hundreds of hard working folk that I see daily. The rich peeps drag more dough out of the system that we pay into than all the welfare-cheaters combined, so I'm just sayin' that if you wanna go all Limbaugh on someone, you might wanna start at the top.

Chrisisallonamission

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 5:50 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


*sigh

Im not going all Limbaugh.

My point is, I shouldn't have to pay, thru my income taxes (which are forcibly taken from me) for the low or the high scum. (Wall Street bailout?)

Let them both rot.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 5:59 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Wulf, it all depends on the kind of society that you want. Do you want a society where the rich prey on the poor? Do you want a society where people feel cared-for, even if they get sick or are disabled? Do you want "every man for himself and God against all"?

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 6:06 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Do you want "every man for himself and God against all"?

Yes. Except I don't believe that God would be against all. In act, as the "author" of free will...I think God would be for a society based on CHOICE.

I want a society where you keep what you earn. Period. If you want to use some of what you've earned and "spead it around" yourself, you would be free to do so. Or not. It would be YOUR CHOICE.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 6:08 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Wulf and SergeantX both think that people can be completely 'free' of society - free of any influence.

I say - give them their freedom. Give them enough shock therapy to erase all the knowledge society has poured into them - how to read, write and figure, and reason; how to talk and walk; how to not poop and pee on themselves; strip them naked and set them off in the wilderness somewhere, away from all of society's restrictions.

FLY AND BE FREE ! DON'T LET US HOLD YOU DOWN !


***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 6:14 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Do you want "every man for himself and God against all"?

Yes. Except I don't believe that God would be against all. In act, as the "author" of free will...I think God would be for a society based on CHOICE.

I want a society where you keep what you earn. Period. If you want to use some of what you've earned and "spead it around" yourself, you would be free to do so. Or not. It would be YOUR CHOICE.





So you are completely indifferent to the fate of people who, through no fault of their own - I'm not talking about leeches who abuse the system - end up homeless and starving and unable to get any medical care. With their disabled kids and infants and bed-ridden elderly parents?

Or do you rely, ultimately, on the idea that people WILL out of their own free will refrain from throwing them out and letting them starve, through voluntary charity?

I'm not saying this to be judgmental, just to make sure. I've had interesting and eye-opening discussions on these boards before, and usually there is a working system behind people's ideas that doesn't rely on either cruelty or extreme optimism.



Edited for typo correction.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 6:28 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

NEW YORK (CNN) -- In the midst of Wall Street's agonizing slide last week, there was at least one place in Manhattan where the liquor was flowing, the cigar smoke was billowing and the theme of the evening was simple: Work hard. Play hard.

"I was a crook," says Jordan Belfort, once a Wall Street fat cat who made $1 million a week before going to jail.

"It's like fiddling. Nero fiddled while Rome burned," said Thomas Graf, vice president and producer of Northmarq Capital. "We're smoking cigars while we're losing our shirts, literally." He was among hundreds of mid-level Wall Street executives and traders gathered for a party thrown by Cigar Report magazine, published by New York-based Doubledown Media. And if they seemed a little tone-deaf about how this kind of event could be perceived as millions of dollars were lost, at least on paper, most did not seem especially concerned. "It is a great time," said Adam Marsh of Empire Capital Partners. "I think for at least a couple of hours in the evening, we can kind of sit back, have a few drinks, forget what's facing us on the Street tomorrow."

Few of the men and women at the party earned millions in Wall Street bonuses on top of their salaries. But nearly all did very well, they say, at the top of the Wall Street bubble. And their bosses, along with those who managed Wall Street hedge funds, did even better. "These guys were spending more than $250 billion a year," Robert Frank said. "They bought mansions in Greenwich and Palm Beach. They bought art for $100 million a painting."

Frank, author of "Richistan," says the enormous amounts of money earned by Wall Street elite made them practically a nation unto themselves. "They just looked at the guy with the bigger house, the nicer Ferrari, the better artwork," he said. "And it was all competitive spending." One prominent example is the CEO of Lehman Brothers, Richard Fuld. In 2007 alone, according to the executive compensation firm Equilar, he earned total take-home compensation of more than $45 million in salary and bonuses. Congressional researchers said he earned nearly $500 million from 2000 through 2007.



www.cnn.com/2008/US/10/17/siu.wall.street/index.html

I think it is inconcievable to some how very rich the very rich really are. Focusing on ringers like "Joe the Plumber" is beside the point.


---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 6:34 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


No, I am not completly indifferent to those folks. If there are such folks who are so hard on their luck, then they should be able to go to someplace that would shelter and support them.

These places can be paid for through charity, freely given by the people. We forget that Americans are some of, if not the most, charitable people on the planet.

So. For the few, who thru no fault of their own, nor thru their own stupidity or greed, are without shelter, food, clothing, (and family and friends to help them), there would be charitable organizations for them.

However, without our paychecks being taxed, people would be able to keep all of what they earn. Which, combined with controlled spending habits, would curtail the most extreme poverty.

Think about it. You keep what you earn. In a lot of ways it would serve even the most liberal agenda.

Without as much taxation, the government would not be able to go to war as easily as it does now. Nor support itself in whatever endevor it chooses. It would depend on the people giving their money for it to happen.

In a way, losing the income tax puts complete economic power back in the hands of the people. Where it should be.

So, to be succinct, I am against income taxes. However, until Ron Paul is president, I have to pay said taxes. As such, I am against them being used in ANY social program.

With the sole social exception being education.














NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 6:35 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:

I think it is inconcievable to some how very rich the very rich really are.



I really really don't get it...If I had that kind of money, I'd have a freakin' BATCAVE. Or an Iron Man suit. Don't any of these rich f**kin' losers have any comics???? Not ONE ever wanted to be Bruce Wayne???

THAT'S what's inconthievable IMO.

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 6:37 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:


With the sole social exception being education.

????
Can't a person educate themselves?

No,reallyisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 6:38 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


(To Rue)

Bitch, please. Read what I write, not what you want to see.

Get them bifocals changed.



lol

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 7:14 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Wulfie ---

You already owe a tremendous debt to society. Everyone is helpless and dependent and two points in their life - at the beginning and at the end, and most people are helpless and dependent at some point in between. What makes us different from chimpanzees (who obviously love and care for their families) is that we have a social structure that allows us to support our very dependent individuals. In fact, extreme dependency is that hallmark of the human infant.

BUT, but ! ... you say - it wasn't society that raised me, it was my family. And that's true. Though let's imagine your family without the social benefits THEY had - no language, no reasoning, no technology, no tribe - imagine them just like you would be if you were stripped of all learning and support. They wouldn't have done such a good job, I'll bet, and you would be no better off than if you'd been raised by animals --- if indeed you would have survived.

You have no choice in the matter - you already owe your life to society. And not as a result of some individual choice, but to society in general. Wrap your mind around that, if you can.


***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 7:23 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


I never said that society is NOT important.

In fact, what I AM saying is that a FREE society (bereft of forced inclusion, exclusion, or socialism) is of the utmost import.

"Though let's imagine your family without the social benefits THEY had - no language, no reasoning, no technology, no tribe - imagine them just like you would be if you were stripped of all learning and support. They wouldn't have done such a good job, I'll bet, and you would be no better off than if you'd been raised by animals --- if indeed you would have survived."

How did you get that from what I have been saying? Also, study a bit of anthropology before you lay the gift of reasoning at the feet of society.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 7:34 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Wulfie -

"... a FREE society (bereft of forced inclusion, exclusion, or socialism) is of the utmost import."

You still don't get it. By virtue of being born into a society you are already included - you get all the benefits (and the problems) automatically. You simply don't have a choice.



"Also, study a bit of anthropology before you lay the gift of reasoning at the feet of society."

There are 'feral children' who never learn to speak or to walk or to do any of those things we think of as 'human'. If they 'reason' it is the same way an animal 'reasons'.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 7:46 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Rue, whats your point?

How does this have anything to do with getting rid of income tax?

A society that cannot take care of itself WITHOUT being forced to do so, is a doomed society. As well it should be.





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 7:53 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Income tax is a lot like product specifications, currency, agreed on physical standards, the side of the road you drive on and the meaning of stop signs - they are all socially mediated structures that allow the society you enjoy, and by which you benefit, to exist.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:00 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Wrong.

You can do ALL of that (roads, schools, signs etc) with a much more limited government and the tax on goods, which is already in place.

How great would it be if the next time the government wanted to go to war (without a Declaration of War), they had to ask the people for money to do so? (Not saying that we should let our military lag behind. Again, tho, this could be paid for without the income tax..)

Or, after whatever next bubble burst, they had to ASK the people to donate money to the bailout effort?

Or, if they wanted to build a bridge to nowhere?




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:11 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"You can do ALL of that (roads, schools, signs etc) with a much more limited government and the tax on goods, which is already in place."

You're proposing more of the same stuff that got us into this financial mess in the first place - in some ways you're worse than 'double down' McCain. He at least wants to just keep things the same.

The only people who benefit from a lack of income tax are businesses and the wealthy. And since Reagan dropped the tax rate on those making more than a few million down from 78% to 33% (or less, with tax shelters) the rich have only gotten more rich and more powerful to the point where they are now running the country for their personal financial benefit. And the middle class has shrunk and been put on the run chasing from one crisis to the next. And what you're proposing is an even more extreme version of 'tinkle on' economics.

How's that worked so far ?


***************************************************************

We'll lose a little with every transaction, but don't worry - we'll make up for it in volume.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:13 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
So. For the few, who thru no fault of their own, nor thru their own stupidity or greed, are without shelter, food, clothing, (and family and friends to help them), there would be charitable organizations for them.




Thank you for explaining.

Quote:


So, to be succinct, I am against income taxes. However, until Ron Paul is president, I have to pay said taxes. As such, I am against them being used in ANY social program.

With the sole social exception being education.



If you put it in the context of social programs, does this mean something other than basic kindergarten to graduation type of education?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:19 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Rue,
YOU would also benefit from a lack of income tax.

Simple math here....

You make 50,000. The government takes 12,000 in income taxes...

However, if there were no income taxes, you would KEEP that money. And hey, if you really believed in a charitable organization (or a few) you could give that money to them yourself.

Or, you could take that money and put a down payment on a house or a car.

Either way, it would be YOUR CHOICE.

Better life for everyone.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:21 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Agent,

I think that the ONLY Social Program that our taxes should pay would be for Public Ed thru High School.

After that, its up to you to get into college.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:25 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Since you didn't actually address my points and I added some, here it is, again:

You're proposing more of the same stuff that got us into this financial mess in the first place - in some ways you're worse than 'double down' McCain. He at least wants to just keep things the same.

The only people who benefit from a lack of income tax are businesses and the wealthy. And since Reagan dropped the tax rate on those making more than a few million down from 78% to 33% (or less, with tax shelters) the rich have only gotten more rich and more powerful to the point where they are now running the country for their personal financial benefit. And the middle class has shrunk and been put on the run chasing from one crisis to the next. And what you're proposing is an even more extreme version of 'tinkle on' economics.

How's that worked so far ?

***************************************************************

BTW - an appeal to personal greed doesn't work on me.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:26 AM

CHRISISALL


I also believe Income Tax is borderline-legal, and stupid to boot.
Tax on what you buy, period.
I buy a $20,000 car, $2,000 goes to Uncle Sam.
He buys a $30,000,000 yacht, $3,000,000 goes to Uncle Sam.
(No tax on food, or housing (1st residence only))
No loop holes.

isall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:29 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


I make $20,000 a year and spend ALL of it on necessities - and end up on the street due to taxes.

And - see above Chris, Is All. Do you really want MORE 'tinkle on' economics ? Do your really want the wealthy and powerful to be even MORE wealthy and powerful than they are now ?

How's that worked so far ?

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:35 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:

And - see above Chris, Is All. Do you really want MORE 'tinkle on' economics ? Do your really want the wealthy and powerful to be even MORE wealthy and powerful than they are now ?


Seems to me the richest few end up not only paying no taxes, but some make money on the deal.
Imagine the horror when told they HAD to pay the tax on their Ferrari or they couldn't buy it???

Please feel free to correct me if I'm being naieve here...

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:35 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Fine then, Rue, since all you want to do is punish the rich....

Make it simple.

If ther must be income tax...(and until the next revolution I guess there must be), make it a flat one.

1% across the board.

You make 100,000. That a 1,000 to the government.

You make 50,000. Thats 500 to the government.

You make 10 mill? Thats a million to the government.

Simple. Fair.

Done.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:51 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


I think the two of you are ignoring historical facts.

Ever since Reagan flattened the progressive income tax structure, government debt soared, the rich and powerful started running the country for their own economic benefit, more people became impoverished, and the gap between rich and poor is now as large as it was in 1929. And the economy has tanked.

And you two want those same polices - just boosted to an extreme. I have to keep asking you because neither of you has answered the question yet - HOW'S THAT WORKED SO FAR ?.

The only time the trends were reversed was when Clinton raised taxes on the wealthy and raised the minimum wage, effectively narrowing the gap (however slightly) between the very rich and the rest of us. And what horrible things happened as a result ? The economy really did boom. And the government started to pay down its debt.

You may not like the facts, but they speak for themselves.


***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 8:55 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hmm... Okay, Wulf, let's figure out how "no tax" would work...

Road construction and repair. Each state does its own? That kinda defeat the purpose of an interstate, and nearly everyone agrees (I think) that our transportation system is what makes us prosperous. Toll roads are just too impractical. (What do you do, pay a toll at the end of your driveway b4 your drive onto a city street? Pay another toll for county roads, and another for interstates?) However, each jurisdiction COULD create its own fuel tax. That way, the heaviest users pay the highest amount. Sound fair?

"The justice system" Police, judges, attorneys, jails- the whole shebangabang. To some extent I agree with Frem: the "beat cop" is almost never there when you need him (her) and jail time almost never reforms anyone. However, I still see a need for detectives, crime scene investigators, forensics experts, judges and attorneys, process servers, and bounty hunters. And those services have to be within the means of the everyday person otherwise its just "justice for the rich". Unlike raod use, I see no way to fund this on a fee-for-service basis.

Intra- and interstate pollution, safety, product etc regulation The person downstream, downwind, or later in time must be protected from those who are upstream upwind, or predecessors. I suppose a community COULD bring a lawuit against a company, or one state could sue another, but it would require (1) that people GET HURT first (2)an army of technical experts on both sides, and (3) the process would have to be repeated for each individual case. And then, how do you sue someone for what was done 20 years ago? Seems like a terrific waste of resources... guaranteed employment for trial lawyers everywhere... and ultimately it prevents the accumulation of knowledge.

National defense I think it sucks up way too much money, but I see no way to fund it, unless we want to go the barbarian route and have our soldiers pillage and loot.


Maybe the best way to go is to allow people to check on their tax return WHERE they want their dollars to go!

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 9:06 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


So Sigy,

You believe that the txes we pay on the sale of goods/services would NOT be enough to take care of these things?

Please back that up with figures on how much money is generated by sales tax on a National level.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 17, 2008 9:07 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Fine then, Rue, since all you want to do is punish the rich....
Punish the rich??? You have got to be f*cking sh*ttin' me, man! Do you have ANY idea how many tax breaks corporations get, compared to us peeps??? Do you have ANY idea how many breaks the wealthy get, compared to us regular folks???? And that's not even effing counting the fact that our sons and daughters spill their blood for ExxonMobil, or Kennecot Copper, or United Fruit!

ETA: Sales taxes are REGRESSIVE. They tax the poor (who spend a higher percentage of their income) more than they tax the rich. Sales tax= bad idea. It punishes the poor.


---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, November 28, 2024 17:48 - 4779 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:32 - 1163 posts
Trump, convicted of 34 felonies
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:10 - 45 posts
Salon: How to gather with grace after that election
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:04 - 1 posts
End of the world Peter Zeihan
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:59 - 215 posts
Another Putin Disaster
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:58 - 1540 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:46 - 650 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:41 - 4847 posts
Dubai goes bankrupt, kosher Rothschilds win the spoils
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:31 - 5 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:29 - 7515 posts
Jean-Luc Brunel, fashion mogul Peter Nygard linked to Epstein
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:27 - 14 posts
All things Space
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:17 - 270 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL