REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

The Obama presidency: Here comes socialism!

POSTED BY: CREVANREAVER
UPDATED: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 18:10
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 955
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:26 PM

CREVANREAVER


By Dick Morris

Quote:

2009-2010 will rank with 1913-14, 1933-36, 1964-65 and 1981-82 as years that will permanently change our government, politics and lives. Just as the stars were aligned for Wilson, Roosevelt, Johnson and Reagan, they are aligned for Obama. Simply put, we enter his administration as free-enterprise, market-dominated, laissez-faire America. We will shortly become like Germany, France, the United Kingdom, or Sweden — a socialist democracy in which the government dominates the economy, determines private-sector priorities and offers a vastly expanded range of services to many more people at much higher taxes.

Obama will accomplish his agenda of “reform” under the rubric of “recovery.” Using the electoral mandate bestowed on a Democratic Congress by restless voters and the economic power given his administration by terrified Americans, he will change our country fundamentally in the name of lifting the depression. His stimulus packages won’t do much to shorten the downturn — although they will make it less painful — but they will do a great deal to change our nation.

In implementing his agenda, Barack Obama will emulate the example of Franklin D. Roosevelt. (Not the liberal mythology of the New Deal, but the actuality of what it accomplished.) When FDR took office, he was enormously successful in averting a total collapse of the banking system and the economy. But his New Deal measures only succeeded in lowering the unemployment rate from 23 percent in 1933, when he took office, to 13 percent in the summer of 1937. It never went lower. And his policies of over-regulation generated such business uncertainty that they triggered a second-term recession. Unemployment in 1938 rose to 17 percent and, in 1940, on the verge of the war-driven recovery, stood at 15 percent. (These data and the real story of Hoover’s and Roosevelt’s missteps, uncolored by ideology, are available in The Forgotten Man by Amity Shlaes, copyright 2007.)

But in the name of a largely unsuccessful effort to end the Depression, Roosevelt passed crucial and permanent reforms that have dominated our lives ever since, including Social Security, the creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, unionization under the Wagner Act, the federal minimum wage and a host of other fundamental changes.

Obama’s record will be similar, although less wise and more destructive. He will begin by passing every program for which liberals have lusted for decades, from alternative-energy sources to school renovations, infrastructure repairs and technology enhancements. These are all good programs, but they normally would be stretched out for years. But freed of any constraint on the deficit — indeed, empowered by a mandate to raise it as high as possible — Obama will do them all rather quickly.

But it is not his spending that will transform our political system, it is his tax and welfare policies. In the name of short-term stimulus, he will give every American family (who makes less than $200,000) a welfare check of $1,000 euphemistically called a refundable tax credit. And he will so sharply cut taxes on the middle class and the poor that the number of Americans who pay no federal income tax will rise from the current one-third of all households to more than half. In the process, he will create a permanent electoral majority that does not pay taxes, but counts on ever-expanding welfare checks from the government. The dependency on the dole, formerly limited in pre-Clinton days to 14 million women and children on Aid to Families with Dependent Children, will now grow to a clear majority of the American population.

Will he raise taxes? Why should he? With a congressional mandate to run the deficit up as high as need be, there is no reason to raise taxes now and risk aggravating the depression. Instead, Obama will follow the opposite of the Reagan strategy. Reagan cut taxes and increased the deficit so that liberals could not increase spending. Obama will raise spending and increase the deficit so that conservatives cannot cut taxes. And, when the economy is restored, he will raise taxes with impunity, since the only people who will have to pay them would be rich Republicans.

In the name of stabilizing the banking system, Obama will nationalize it. Using Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to write generous checks to needy financial institutions, his administration will demand preferred stock in exchange. Preferred stock gets dividends before common stockholders do. With the massive debt these companies will owe to the government, they will only be able to afford dividends for preferred stockholders — the government, not private investors. So who will buy common stock? And the government will demand that its bills be paid before any profits that might materialize are reinvested in the financial institution, so how will the value of the stocks ever grow? Devoid of private investors, these institutions will fall ever more under government control.

Obama will begin the process by limiting executive compensation. Then he will urge restructuring and lowering of home mortgages in danger of default (as the feds have already done with Citibank).

Then will come guidance on the loans to make and government instructions on the types of enterprises to favor. God grant that some Blagojevich type is not in charge of the program, using his power to line his pockets. The United States will find itself with an economic system comparable to that of Japan, where the all-powerful bureaucracy at MITI (Ministry of International Trade and Industry) manages the economy, often making mistakes like giving mainframe computers priority over the development of laptops.

But it is the healthcare system that will experience the most dramatic and traumatic of changes. The current debate between erecting a Medicare-like governmental single payer or channeling coverage through private insurance misses the essential point. Without a lot more doctors, nurses, clinics, equipment and hospital beds, health resources will be strained to the breaking point. The people and equipment that now serve 250 million Americans and largely neglect all but the emergency needs of the other 50 million will now have to serve everyone. And, as government imposes ever more Draconian price controls and income limits on doctors, the supply of practitioners and equipment will decline as the demand escalates. Price increases will be out of the question, so the government will impose healthcare rationing, denying the older and sicker among us the care they need and even barring them from paying for it themselves. (Rationing based on income and price will be seen as immoral.)

And Obama will move to change permanently the partisan balance in America. He will move quickly to legalize all those who have been in America for five years, albeit illegally, and to smooth their paths to citizenship and voting. He will weaken border controls in an attempt to hike the Latino vote as high as he can in order to make red states like Texas into blue states like California. By the time he is finished, Latinos and African-Americans will cast a combined 30 percent of the vote. If they go by top-heavy margins for the Democrats, as they did in 2008, it will assure Democratic domination (until they move up the economic ladder and become good Republicans).

And he will enact the check-off card system for determining labor union representation, repealing the secret ballot in union elections. The result will be to raise the proportion of the labor force in unions up to the high teens from the current level of about 12 percent.

Finally, he will use the expansive powers of the Federal Communications Commission to impose “local” control and ownership of radio stations and to impose the “fairness doctrine” on talk radio. The effect will be to drive talk radio to the Internet, fundamentally change its economics, and retard its growth for years hence.

But none of these changes will cure the depression. It will end when the private sector works through the high debt levels that triggered the collapse in the first place. And, then, the large stimulus package deficits will likely lead to rapid inflation, probably necessitating a second recession to cure it.

So Obama’s name will be mud by 2012 and probably by 2010 as well. And the Republican Party will make big gains and regain much of its lost power.

But it will be too late to reverse the socialism of much of the economy, the demographic change in the electorate, the rationing of healthcare by the government, the surge of unionization and the crippling of talk radio.



http://thehill.com/dick-morris/the-obama-presidency--here-comes-social
ism-2009-01-20.html

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:40 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


I'm still trying to figure out which part of the laissez-faire America Bush's bailouts fit into.

Sorry, but once I hit that part, I was laughing too hard to finish the article.

Mike

"It is complete now; the hands of time are neatly tied."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 6:10 PM

DREAMTROVE


Quote:


I'm still trying to figure out which part of the laissez-faire America Bush's bailouts fit into.



I'm sorry, as the board's major foe of socialism, I also cracked up.

Mike, screw the bailouts for a moment. Laissez-faire means hands-off. I think that went out the window with the Patriot Act.

Here's an interesting story I read years ago that made me a Ron Paul man. He was talking about the budget. In 2001, while working on the 2002 budget, Bush and Cheney told the committee to take a budget draft they had made, and work on it, and come back to them with any problems or suggestions. Which they did. Paul and someone else, a democrat I think, went and submitted their changes to the administration.

They were told that this would be dealt with, and a new budget was written, containing none of the modifications suggested, and so Paul went back to the White House with a detailed explanation of why the budget was unworkable, how it would lead to a horrid deficit, and numerous options on ways to either reduce spending or raise revenue. He said at the end of that meeting the administration had made it very clear that there were never to be any changes to any of their policies or legislation, only the appearance of a legislative process.

Paul suspected at that moment that this was not a republic, but a dictatorship. He said those fears were realized when he was handed the USA PATRIOT Act. This document was clearly crafted to obfuscate its real aim, and when unravelled, only he and Democrat Russ Feingold were able to discern that aim: To systematically dismantle the fundamentals of the Constitution.

So, I feel confident that "Still Congressman Paul" will be sure to attack the President's plan if he feels in any way that it is traitorous to American values and freedoms, just as he was willing to strike at his fellow Texas Republican. He said he had no built in bias against Bush, he was ready to give him the benefit of the doubt, all he had to do was show some willingness to listen reason, or anyone, and show some respect for the American people.

Now I'm sure he'll give that benefit of the doubt to the President, but if Obama decides to institute socialism, I'm sure we'll be hearing about it from Paul, and other people we've already learned to trust.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, March 2, 2025 13:47 - 5165 posts
6ixStringJack's Software Project
Sun, March 2, 2025 13:34 - 4 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Sun, March 2, 2025 13:07 - 792 posts
Putin's Legacy
Sun, March 2, 2025 11:15 - 122 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Sun, March 2, 2025 11:13 - 1183 posts
'Flat-Earth' movement or Flat Earther cult is growing...in 2023 & 2024 not the 1400s
Sun, March 2, 2025 10:50 - 50 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Sun, March 2, 2025 10:43 - 465 posts
Why has comedy become too political, Un-funny, Stasi and Orwellian
Sun, March 2, 2025 08:16 - 19 posts
Hollywood exposes themselves as the phony whores they are
Sun, March 2, 2025 08:13 - 118 posts
Asteroid Coming 27 May
Sun, March 2, 2025 08:11 - 7 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, March 2, 2025 06:43 - 7949 posts
Music II
Sun, March 2, 2025 04:10 - 180 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL