Obama's picks: 3 quitters, 3 tax cheats and 2 more conflict of interest. by AURaptor

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Obama's picks: 3 quitters, 3 tax cheats and 2 more conflict of interest.

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Saturday, February 7, 2009 06:41
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 6250
PAGE 6 of 6

Thursday, February 5, 2009 8:51 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Storymark:
Wow. It's waaaaay too easy to get you wingnuts riled up.

So even when your lies are spelled out so clearly in such simple language that even a retard like you should be able to understand it, you remian incapable of comprehending how wrong and delusional you are?

And then you feign ignorance about why nobody bothers to respond to your lies, when most of us with a brain (meaning those who disagree with you) don't bother replying or trying to help enlighten you with facts and knowledge.

You really must be the biggest loser on this site, on a level all to yourself.
And for those of us who can think for ourselves, we are in awe of the patience it takes for the enlightened such as AuRaptor, Geezer, Kirkules to entertain your delusions of knowledge or discussion.
You have forfeited the right to claim anybody should respond to your nonsensical "arguments".
Whatever will your talking points coaches have you do now?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 5, 2009 8:56 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:
I would think an oral exam would allow much greater discrimination, but the written exam can isolate the status of race, color, creed and allow the answers to be compared equally.
Whatever. I am in a much more agreeable state due to the Alba thread.
This site is great; I love all you guys.
The Shinyness of heterosexuality trumps all argumentation.
Peace through Alba.

The laughing Chrisisall

Albaholicisall, Mostly I saw red x city in that thread, but maybe they did include the shots of the other nipple in her wardrobe malfunctions - those are quite common pics.
if you have not, I suggest more unovered Albaness in Good Luck Chuck and Awake (including the soaked t-shirt scenes).

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 5, 2009 8:58 PM

CHRISISALL

Quote:
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:
And for those of us who can think for ourselves, we are in awe of the patience it takes for the enlightened such as AuRaptor, Geezer, Kirkules to entertain your delusions of knowledge or discussion.

[Bad guy from "Help" voice]
Go to the Alba thread... Go to the Alba thread...

The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 5, 2009 9:03 PM

CHRISISALL

Quote:
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:

Albaholicisall

Sorry, my Wife is a hot laitina; I seem to have a type.

Ai corumba!

The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 12:51 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:

Albaholicisall
Sorry, my Wife is a hot laitina; I seem to have a type.

Ai corumba!

The laughing Chrisisall

I hope you did not confuse a compliment for a complaint. I assumed you were aware Albaholics refer to themselves as such.
Latinaholicisall is slightly less rhythmic.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 4:00 AM

DREAMTROVE

I don't know why, but all this talk about hot latinas having to take an oral rite of passage is putting an image into my head.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 4:10 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by dreamtrove:
I don't know why, but all this talk about hot latinas having to take an oral rite of passage is putting an image into my head.

oh that's just great!

I'll be in my bunk.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 4:23 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg

Alba.....soooo hot........

Lol

Which brings to mind Sin City....which charecter are you?

A suggestion...

John Hartigan = Frem

I'll be Marv... after all....my knuckles are scrapped from dragging them on the floor all over the place.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 5:12 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Gosh I hate to drag real world experience into a real-world thread, but having helped create a written chemist exam I can tell you that it's way too easy for unconscious bias to sneak into the questions, and very hard to ferret it out.

Now, OTOH, if the fire fighters are complaining about having to take ANY sort of written multiple-choice test.... screw 'em. If they choke on a test, how will they respond to a real-world crisis?

---------------------------------
It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 5:26 AM

DREAMTROVE

I'm in favor of standardized testing. I used to write questions for the SAT, and ETS was real strict on that sort of stuff. OTOH, for some reason when I got the test there was a question on it about Hamlet's soliloquy. "Soliloquy" was the vocab word, and the foils were things like "diatribe." It would have been possible to answer not knowing Shakespeare but knowing the language very well, but the question would be a shoe in for anyone familiar with Shakespeare. I wonder how the question got in there, given that I could never have put up anything close to that.

But in man-hour terms, the standardized test is the obvious answer. And it's better done by some massive corporation than an individual teacher. Random college students with last year's test can get an A in some classes without knowing anything about the subject. It's a tricky art.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 7:46 AM

STORYMARK

Quote:
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:
Quote:
Originally posted by Storymark:
Wow. It's waaaaay too easy to get you wingnuts riled up.

So even when your lies are spelled out so clearly in such simple language that even a retard like you should be able to understand it, you remian incapable of comprehending how wrong and delusional you are?

And then you feign ignorance about why nobody bothers to respond to your lies, when most of us with a brain (meaning those who disagree with you) don't bother replying or trying to help enlighten you with facts and knowledge.

You really must be the biggest loser on this site, on a level all to yourself.
And for those of us who can think for ourselves, we are in awe of the patience it takes for the enlightened such as AuRaptor, Geezer, Kirkules to entertain your delusions of knowledge or discussion.
You have forfeited the right to claim anybody should respond to your nonsensical "arguments".
Whatever will your talking points coaches have you do now?

No halfwit, you seem to be missing that my sole point here is to piss of Rappy. You just stepping in front of the target.

"Enlightened". Now that is funny, I will give you that.

I don't care how good they are at arguing a point, anyone who so slavishly devotes themselves to failed policies and ways of thinking so bad they've led us to an ever deepening spiral of woe, cannot be considered anything other than a Moran. Which is why they deserve nothing but scorn and mockery.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 7:54 AM

CHRISISALL

Quote:
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:
I assumed you were aware Albaholics refer to themselves as such.

I did not know that.

The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 8:06 AM

DREAMTROVE

Philip K Dick fans call themselves "dickheads" :)
True, too.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 8:27 AM

CITIZEN

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Flotilla? Armada? Regatta?

A "fleet" or "armada" generally implies military connotations, though. You can have a fleet of warships, but generally not a fleet of yachts.

Does that make sense?

Armada is Spanish, coming from medieval Latin for army. It's usually used to refer to an entire fleet that has been tasked with a single mission, instead of breaking the fleet up into individual squadrons.

A Regatta is a race.

Fleets are less military than Flotilla really. Flotilla are fleets which are comprised of the same class of ship.

You can have a fleet of virtually anything, like a company car fleet, or a fishing fleet. Personally I'd guess that a group of Yachts would be a flotilla, but fleet would work equally well.

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 9:36 AM

DREAMTROVE

Quote:

*There's still a lotta leftover socialist leanings in the black community, and the reason for that is a quite natural counter-reaction to hardline right/imperial racism over the years, and to understand why that can naturally come around to Anarchism so easily, I've provided a handy, although oversimplified, visual aid for ya.

Ya sure? 'cause I look back and blacks weren't on the left until the 1960s, maybe 50s, 40s, some migration, but all that time it was dems who were being imperialist.

Here's my take: Folks support it when they get a hand out. Any voter bloc can probably be bought. I know a lot of conservatives who can't move from their position because they want their tax break. Same damn thing. Of course, not everyone is a sell out, but those who do invoke peer pressure on everyone else.

Goes back to that whole addiction thing. The reward system, the handout/tax break recipient stands the same thing to gain by garnering local support.

Only reason I say this is Think about the civil rights movement that turned the black population democratic. The GOP at the time was in power, when it started, and supported the idea. They didn't have anything against Eisenhower/Nixon, and sure, there was republican resistance to the idea, but there was a lot of democratic resistance as well (Strom Thurmond's lil campaign? for example?)

IMHO, It's a Kennedy/Johnson magic trick, like the one Cheney's crew pulled with Christians (they weren't always republicans.)

Just my 2 cents, now back to work

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 9:42 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!

Back to the title --- I would really, REALLY like to see Obama pick a few repubicans and have them vetted thoroughly.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 9:59 AM

DREAMTROVE

Quote:
Originally posted by AURAPTOR:

Silly Rue, no one cares about the thread title anymore.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 10:03 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!

It just got too long for me to catch up.

(I don't actually know any young guys who are supposed to be hot, so I picked him at random.)

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 10:14 AM

THATWEIRDGIRL

Gah.

I don't check in often enough and I miss the entire point of a thread. I don't even know what to comment on now. Latinas with an oral fixation? Bombing people? Firefly retention? Ass to mouth? What's going on?!

I'm not surprised the administration is vetting people with problems. I'm surprised they aren't mentioning the known problems with the announcement and why it should not be a problem for their new position. Not that I care much for their choices thus far...but am I ever going to be completely happy with an appointment? Nah.

---
Sometimes I lie awake at night, and I ask, "Where have I gone wrong?" Then a voice says to me, "This is going to take more than one night."
-- Charlie Brown
www.thatcostumegirl.com
www.thatweirdgirl.com

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 10:20 AM

DREAMTROVE

Double Post

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 6, 2009 10:20 AM

DREAMTROVE

Christian Bale is a decent looking guy, but I'm not the best judge. You're supposed to be the judge of that. If you're part of the girl on girl crowd, post girls, everyone'll appreciate that 'cept fmf.

He does have the cache of being psycho du jour. I think it's hollywood that put the pressure on, might have even given him the steroids and amphetamines that I'm guessing pushed him over the edge. As long as he doesn't go all Mel Gibson on us it'll probably work out okay.

I don't actually have a Jessica Alba obsession, just feeding what the people want. It was a dark angel thread, that's why. I figure, keep it topical. Otherwise madness might ensue. (witness my exchange with fmf on the dark angel thread, which itself is just softcore porn, that's what happens when Chris tries to be serious. It's my fault, I think. Rap started it!)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, February 7, 2009 6:26 AM

FREMDFIRMA

Ooo, Empress Regent TWG!
*melts*

Yanno, if it didn't make me feel like a dirty old perv, I'd drool over YOU, sweetheart.

I still think you should do Suiseiseki though, cause it fits oh so very well, desu.

-F

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, February 7, 2009 6:41 AM

DREAMTROVE

That Weird Girl

1. This thread was about something?

2. Not latinas with an oral fixation, whether or not they would do better with an oral exam. ;)

3. The theory at large is that Obama is trying to knock down his own nominees, because they aren't his personal picks, they were handed to him by the Clintonistas. We know this mostly because he said who he wanted for cabinet picks, as have the Clintons, and oh, look who got nominated? and that's because Obama knows like no one in washington, and the clintons know like everyone, so they pulled strings. so, sure, these are technically his nominees, but they aren't the people he wants. He'd much rather have Buffett for treasury than Geitner. Who wouldn't? But president ain't a king. He has to deal with people. I guess a king has to deal with influence peddlers too.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE