Rush Limhaugh challenges Obama to a 1 on 1 debate. Let's see if O is man enough to accept. by whozit

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)

God forbid.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, February 28, 2009 1:42 PM

WHOZIT

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
God forbid.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, February 28, 2009 1:46 PM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
God forbid.

Right....

Honesty

Experienced

Successful

Who'd want THOSE qualities in a President ?

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

A concern of the GOP is that the people aren't informed enough to understand their policies, while a fear of the Dems is that the people ARE.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, February 28, 2009 1:55 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
God forbid.

Right....

Honesty

Experienced

Successful

Who'd want THOSE qualities in a President ?

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

A concern of the GOP is that the people aren't informed enough to understand their policies, while a fear of the Dems is that the people ARE.

Wow, do you suck at reading.

WhoZit titled the thread "God Speaks" and linked to an article about Rush Limbaugh addressing the Klan - er, CPAC. The article leads off with:

Quote:
Rush Limbaugh was 15 minutes early to the stage, but no one was complaining Saturday evening in Washington, D.C., at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

Quite the contrary. On the conference's third and final day, the conservative talk radio host was the headliner, and the crowd greeted him with an immense ovation.

"Ladies and gentleman, this is my first ever address to the nation," Limbaugh joked, noting that FOX News and C-SPAN were broadcasting the speech live.

Now, if Limbaugh is your god (and I know he's *your* god, Lapdog), then heaven help you.

Me? I was lamenting the idea of Limbaugh being seen as ANYONE'S "god".

But if that's what you want...

Fat.

Bigoted.

Drug-addled, and a complete hypocrite about it.

Exactly the qualities the Republicans WANT in a President!

Mike

If you're going to assume anything, assume you're wrong.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, February 28, 2009 2:18 PM

America loves a winner!

I don't " suck at reading " in the least. The link clearly states that Romney wins straw poll. That's what I commented on, Mitt Romney. I didn't even check the link.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, February 28, 2009 2:52 PM

Uh huh.

And when we, publicly, expose where his MONEY comes from, AGAIN - he will sink like a rock, AGAIN, as every person with a single ounce of humanity turns on his ass, AGAIN.

Is that where you want this conversation to go, cause it can go there, come right on down into the patch, Br'er Fox, why don'tcha...

Or you could just go on your merry.

Tell him to say hi to Ken, Mel and Narvin for me, ehe ?

-Frem
http://www.reason.com/news/show/121088.html

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, February 28, 2009 4:51 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
I don't " suck at reading " in the least. I didn't even check the link.

Beautiful. Perfect.

Mike

If you're going to assume anything, assume you're wrong.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, February 28, 2009 5:08 PM

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=37127#681138

America loves a winner!

Mike,

Beautiful ? Perfect ? I read the link as is, and you that's what you have to say ?

How very odd.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 2:48 AM

CITIZEN

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
I didn't even check the link.

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
I read the link as is, and you that's what you have to say ?

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=37127#681169

These two statements needed to be saved side by side for prosperity.

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 3:08 AM

SERGEANTX

Prosperity?

"You keep using that word. I'm not sure it means what you think it means."

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 3:19 AM

CITIZEN

Quote:
Originally posted by SergeantX:
Prosperity?

"You keep using that word. I'm not sure it means what you think it means."

I think it'll pay dividends for me.

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 3:32 AM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...

I watched in complete awe... how can anyone believe a word this gas bag says? It was almost 2 hours of him sucking up to the people who listen to his show and buy his books.

He cautioned against the "fear mongering" the Dems and Obama are using by using FEAR of his own. "We are under attack! From within!"

They even had to drag Newt G. out of the closet so he could run the same dog and pony show that lost them the election. His big contribution? Adding the word "European" GASP! to the word "Socialism." More fear mongering. They won't learn.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 4:37 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Well, if anyone should know about fear-mongering, it's the Rebubicans. Say, what's the terrorist alert level today? Huh, just before a big speech, so let's call it *ORANGE!*

And those WMD!!! *spittle flies*
Trrrrrorists!!!! *more spittle*

QUICK! GIMME UNCONSTITUTIONAL POWERS!!!!

Sheesh!

---------------------------------
It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 5:22 AM

SERGEANTX

Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
And those WMD!!! *spittle flies*
Trrrrrorists!!!! *more spittle*

QUICK! GIMME UNCONSTITUTIONAL POWERS!!!!

Indeed.

"Doing nothing is not an option!!!!"
"the economy is in crisis!!! We're doomed!!"

QUICK! NATIONALIZE THE BANKS!!!!

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 5:34 AM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...

Quote:
Originally posted by SergeantX:
Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
And those WMD!!! *spittle flies*
Trrrrrorists!!!! *more spittle*

QUICK! GIMME UNCONSTITUTIONAL POWERS!!!!

Indeed.

"Doing nothing is not an option!!!!"
"the economy is in crisis!!! We're doomed!!"

QUICK! NATIONALIZE THE BANKS!!!!

SergeantX

Kind of.

For instance, you mention the economy and the banks.

"the economy is in crisis!!! We're doomed!!"
Please find me one indicator that says the economy is doing well. I hear both sides say "worst since the depression" and the actual number bare that out - it's factual, not subjective. We should be very afraid.

"QUICK! NATIONALIZE THE BANKS!!!!"
How'd they do on their own? How many trillion more in personal worth should we watch them lose? And "Nationlize" is yet another one of those words the reps are trying to taint and scare their constituents with. Why?

"Doing nothing is not an option!!!!"

You really want to do nothing?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 6:23 AM

America loves a winner!

PIZ.... what lost us the election wasn't anything Newt said. In fact, it was McCain's reluctance to say/ do almost anything conservative which lost him the election.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 6:26 AM

SERGEANTX

Quote:
Originally posted by pizmobeach:
I hear both sides say "worst since the depression" ...

By 'both sides' I assume you're talking about Republicans and Democrats. But they're really both on the same side and both more than willing you use scare tactics to increase their own power. Sure, the numbers are bad. But numbers don't dictate a policy. Doing nothing might be the very best option. Weed out some of the baggage and get busy rebuilding our economy. But that notion won't get the time of day because it doesn't benefit politicians.

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 6:31 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT

Cnn.com has this DIRECT QUOTE from El Rusho:

"We believe that the preamble of the Constitution contains an inarguable truth, that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life, liberty, freedom -- and the pursuit of happiness."

Funny, when I had to memorize the Preamble at my LIBERAL PUBLIC High School, that wasn't in there. I do remember words very like that from the Declaration of Independence, which a professor of mine pointed out, was never the law of the land, but a public statement of history and beliefs aimed at the British Parliament, people, and King

Not sayin' I disagree with the philosophy of the quote, just its source. Man's wrong on the FACTS.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 7:31 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by NewOldBrownCoat:
Cnn.com has this DIRECT QUOTE from El Rusho:

"We believe that the preamble of the Constitution contains an inarguable truth, that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life, liberty, freedom -- and the pursuit of happiness."

Funny, when I had to memorize the Preamble at my LIBERAL PUBLIC High School, that wasn't in there. I do remember words very like that from the Declaration of Independence, which a professor of mine pointed out, was never the law of the land, but a public statement of history and beliefs aimed at the British Parliament, people, and King

Not sayin' I disagree with the philosophy of the quote, just its source. Man's wrong on the FACTS.

Yeah, but Rush BELIEVES that it's in the Preamble to the Constitution, so according to RapLogic™, it's not a lie. Passing along untruths because you're stupid and ignorant of the facts isn't lying - at least not if you're a Republican!

This is what the actual Preamble to the Constitution says:

Quote:
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence starts thusly:

Quote:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Mike

If you're going to assume anything, assume you're wrong.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 7:41 AM

America loves a winner!

Wouldn't be the first time anyone confused the two. But the authors of the DoI were pretty much the same who wrote the US Constitution.

Established document of the Government or not, the message of individual freedom and limited intrusion from Government is common in both.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 7:51 AM

America loves a winner!

Should be anyone's RIGHT to like and enjoy drugs and hookers.

If that's how they wanna roll.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 10:39 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Wouldn't be the first time anyone confused the two. But the authors of the DoI were pretty much the same who wrote the US Constitution.

Then again, if I went to church and the Preacher said, " You have to believe me about the absolute infallibility of the Bible, because Jesus says it right there in the Book of Genesis ," I'd be inclined to doubt his qualification. And if he said, "Well, the same people wrote, and were in, the Five Books of Moses, and The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, " I'd be sure of it.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 10:56 AM

Which one of the amendments guarantees your right to the pursuit of happiness, again?

And shouldn't it be anyone's right to have an abortion, too, if that's how they roll? How's that limited intrusion workin' out for ya on that one?

Mike

If you're going to assume anything, assume you're wrong.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 11:28 AM

CITIZEN

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Which one of the amendments guarantees your right to the pursuit of happiness, again?

As I understand it it originally said happyness. Now I've never pursued a happyness before, but I hear it's quite invigorating.

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, March 1, 2009 12:38 PM

Quote:
Wouldn't be the first time anyone confused the two. But the authors of the DoI were pretty much the same who wrote the US Constitution.

BZZZT!

Wrong.

Out of the fifty-six signatories of the DOI, only SIX supported the Constitution, in fact most of them were firmly in the Anti-Federalist camp and opposed the hell spawned thing for very good reasons which are a matter of both public and historic record.

Unless, of course, you're basing off the fictionalised and heavily propagandised public school "history", which is so full of half truths and outright lies like the one I just quoted to support the Federalists that it's just plain laughable.

And we saw where the Federalists wanted to go with it damn near immediately, with Adams and his own little version of the patriot act, didn't we now ?

I don't care what name they hide under, they're the same assholes, spiritual successors interested in a form of neo-fascist-feudalism with them as the lords and us as the peons, and playing on the stupidity of peons dumb enough to root for them against their own interests.

And when that doesn't work, then they resort to the methods of Lincoln the monster, which have their own eerie parallels today, too.

Some days, I wanna beat some sense into people with a history book... this is one of em, cause we as a people seem to never learn a goddamn thing and keep making the same dimwit mistakes over, and over, and over again, something that has annoyed the hell out of me since the moment I first realized it.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, March 2, 2009 5:50 AM

America loves a winner!

I said the AUTHORS of the D.O.I. were pretty much the same ones who AUTHORED the Constitution. Not the SIGNERS, dumbass.

BZZZZT. you're wrong!

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, March 2, 2009 6:00 AM

RIVER6213

I'm moving to Canada. I've about had it up to here with the United States.

-River

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, March 2, 2009 9:11 AM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by RiveR6213:
I'm moving to Canada. I've about had it up to here with the United States.

-River

That's the spirit!

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, March 2, 2009 2:32 PM

RIVER6213

If anyone needed a bullet it is Rush limbaugh. Not because he's right about anything, but because he stirs up hate with lies. He divides people, and he's getting rich because of it. Rush, and his legion of ditto-headed followers. Give me a break.

I really wish someone would kill this big, fat, idiot.

-River

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, March 2, 2009 2:47 PM

Sayin it don't make it no more true Rappy.

Seriously, turn off the fucking idiot box, pick up a freakin history book and actually LEARN something for once.

Cause shooting off your mouth when your brain is empty is about as effective as pulling the trigger of an empty revolver.

Click, click, click.

-F

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, March 2, 2009 2:57 PM

HERO

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Fat.

Actually, he's looking pretty good. Besides, most of America has some extra pounds here and there.

Quote:

Bigoted.

I notice that nobody has every been able to cite evidence of this. He's never said a bigoted word, he employs minorities and pays them as well as others. He advocates equality. He judges people by what they do and what they believe, not by the color of their skin.

Quote:

Drug-addled, and a complete hypocrite about it.

I don't see the hypocracy. He owned up to what he did, suffered the consequences (including the loss of hearing), and apologized. He is critical of drug abuse, he abused drugs...that is hypocracy, but he did not seek to avoid responsibility for what he did nor did he change his view. It was wrong before he did it, he was wrong for doing it, it remains wrong after it was done...that is NOT hypocracy.

Quote:

Exactly the qualities the Republicans WANT in a President!

Most Republicans would not vote for Rush for President.

We want someone with different skills, but the same ideals and passion. Anyone can be a conservative, not everyone is qualified to be President.

Thats not to say he could not do it down the road...I'd like to see how he did in a traditional political role first. Kinda like Palin, I'd have never voted for Mrs. Sarah Palin, mom, wife, etc. I was proud to vote for Governor Sarah Palin...the same person, but one whose demonstrated ability to do the job.

As for CPAC...I'm no Romney fan. I supported Huck, but his show on Fox is too silly...I don't know who I'd support in 2012. I don't think Sarah is right for the big chair (she could run for VP again), Bobby does not do it for me. I just don't know. I wonder what Jeb is up to?

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you"- Chrisisall, 2009.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, March 2, 2009 3:34 PM

America loves a winner!

Frem

Rush is right. More than you can say.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, March 2, 2009 9:19 PM

Rush is a nincompoop, a barely passable entertainer who rode morton downey's coattails into stardom by telling people what they want to hear, with a demographic so stupid that the obvious hypocrisy of his little oxy problem, given his particular rhetoric at times, slid right past them because of partisan blindness.

Frankly the guy is no more a political commentator than a WWF match resembles a UFC match, his baliwick is entertainment, not enlightenment, and you do not seem to understand this.

He can spout off all he wants, mind you, free speech and all that, it's just that nothin he says really carries any more weight than a tent revival preacher trying to rev up the masses or a rock band kicking their fans into a frenzy with a couple good guitar licks.

All that said - that Obama is a jerk with too many Globalist Clintonistas hanging on his nuts to accomplish anything decent if he ever really had that intention, given how intentionally vague he was on campaign, well...

It wasn't Rush you heard that from originally, it was me.

Parroting the bloody obvious doesn't make the guy any kind of smart, you know, especially when he mixes it with half-truths, bloviation (his OWN word, mind you) and general jackassery to put on a nice bread and circus show to keep the masses occupied instead of actually doing something about it beyond running his trap.

Me now - I'd like to fix some of this mess - and frankly I've been nothing but honest with you about it the whole way, from telling you your little idol and his party were about to fall off that pedestal, to pointing out the new guys would immediately step over the line in pushing their agenda, to reaching across the aisle in attempting to form a defense - and even pointing out that should that not happen I would do everything in my power to crush you and your favored political party into dust by putting the boot in while they were down every chance I got, before turning on the other guys and kneecapping them the moment opportunity allowed it.

And I was rather specific in mentioning to you that since you had no intent of actually participating in a bipartisan resistance effort to the inevitable abuses of the democrats, that I would be merciless in busting your chops as you rode the flaming wreck of the GOP into the ground where it properly belongs.

Of course, since I posted that right under a bunch of stuff that'll rile you past coherent thought you ain't likely to read it, which I find all too amusing since you fall for it every time, lemme summarise it in five little words.

"Told ya that was comin."

Now, would you like some more rope, or shall I just yank the yardage you've already bought this round and call it a day, eh ?

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, March 3, 2009 5:26 AM

CHRISISALL

Quote:
Originally posted by Hero:

Actually, he's looking pretty good.

Well, one cannot be funny all the time, Hero.

"Thanks." -Hero, 2009

The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, March 4, 2009 9:40 AM