REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Astronaut didn't change clothes for a month

POSTED BY: WHOZIT
UPDATED: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 08:33
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1506
PAGE 1 of 2

Sunday, August 2, 2009 9:44 AM

WHOZIT

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 2, 2009 10:42 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Just so I could fix the title...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 2, 2009 11:01 AM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Just so I could fix the title...

Mine was funnier

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 2, 2009 11:03 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

The test was among 16 unorthodox experiments suggested by Japanese schoolchildren to see how various items performed in zero gravity. Others included how to fold and store laundry when the garments kept floating away, and how to administer eyedrops in space.


The ingenuity of children.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 3:47 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!



NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 3:51 AM

BYTEMITE


Well, in defense of the Japanese astronaut, she's completely nuts, and a very good argument why crews should be unisex.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 6:30 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I do not think a crazy person is generally a good argument for anything other than avoiding the employ of crazy people at NASA.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 6:50 AM

BYTEMITE


Wasn't NASA or flying made her crazy. It was love. Or lust, I mix the two up.

In any case, I think women have shown that they can keep up with men in a lot of situations (only with different styles), and I think that a return to unisex crews would make management and day-to-day work, functions, and training more efficient. In space, that's kind of important. Elsewhere, we can enjoy the luxury of mixed groups, though heck, so long as one gender isn't promoted above the other, I think other facets of life might show improved efficiency as well with unisex teams.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 7:16 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

I think other facets of life might show improved efficiency as well with unisex teams.



I wonder if it would make marriage more efficient...


Sorry. Couldn't resist that one.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 7:38 AM

BYTEMITE


Duly noted, and I'd be all agreement if it weren't for the me not existing part. (kidding)

But am I completely off base here in what I'm saying?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 8:15 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Aren't prisons unisex ? (except for guards) It doesn't seem to keep interpersonal relationships and all their complications from happening.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 8:21 AM

BYTEMITE


Perhaps not, but I don't think it's a good idea putting male rapists in the same prison as females. I think unisex might be good there too.

Prison seems hellish enough as it is. x_x

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 8:23 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


To sort of get back to the point - it seems that if you confine people together long enough they'll find a way to interact no matter what the gender mix.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 8:33 AM

BYTEMITE


Well, true, using your example of prisons, rape occurs between inmates and from guards to inmates no matter what gender you're talking about...

Psychologically I have to assume that one can be just as damaging as the other, though I have my doubts over whether it can change the sexual orientation of either participant. Seems like the experience would reinforce whatever their usual preference was.

...But I'm pretty sure I've never heard of same sex rape resulting in a pregnancy... So, I'm still going to argue unisex prisons = good. Especially because my impression is, if the administrators of a prison feel like it, they don't have to give a shit about rape or pregnancy. Goes with that whole "criminals are second-class citizens" mentality.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 9:51 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


There have been many assaults and rapes in the mixed-sex US army, a reported 4 in 10 assaults with 3 in 10 as rapes. In the navy roughly 1 in 10 women stationed aboard ship leave due to pregnancy.

There are administrative ways to handle these things which don't penalize women, with DNA testing as part of the package.

But, since the problem seems to be disproportionately one of men misbehaving, perhaps the answer is to have all female armies and crews.


***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 10:06 AM

BYTEMITE


I don't know about completely removing men from the military. I think the men can have their boats and training camps and bases, and the women can have theirs, and at least you've solved the pregnancy problem. Even if you might have the same rape problem, because nothing really fixes the underlying power and control struggles that are the leading cause of rape.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 10:29 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


So is your only objection to mixed-sex whatevers (institutions, missions, teams) pregnancy ? Doesn't rape factor into your thinking ? After all, if you're looking for efficiency, rape would seem to have a deleterious effect. Especially if you are confined with your rapist with no way out.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 11:17 AM

BYTEMITE


Rape happens with same sex groups too, as YOU pointed out. I didn't say that I have no problem with it, I said I don't know of any way to solve the problem.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 11:51 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


I did want to pursue this part a little bit. Apparently the man in the center of the triangle, Oefelein, had been 'romantically involved' with Nowak for two years (far more than a causal short-term flirtation), then he started seeing Shipman before breaking off the relationship with Nowak. My opinion: bad move ... if you want to end a relationship it always helps to get out of the one before you move on to the other. Otherwise you just end up looking - and acting - like a user. Information which I read at the time (and can't find now) indicated he was a proficient player (ie manipulator).

I can't remember where I read this - maybe it was a Heinlein story (Stranger in a Strange Land ?) or a Lee Correy one (Starship Through Space ?) but somewhere I remember reading that people were not only tested for technical proficiency but for stability.

I think the old model for astronauts - the juvenile testosterone swagger of 'the right stuff' - is probably an outdated one. It would probably select for a number of characteristics you don't necessarily want, including a streak of sociopathy. And on long missions, or complicated ones, or mixed sex ones, you want people who are stable and mature.

In any case, Oefelein was removed from NASA's roster b/c of a lack of good sense.

Some random clips:

NASA has fired the astronaut at the center of the former astronaut Lisa Nowak love triangle, officials said.
Bill Oefelein, the shuttle pilot who had relationships with Nowak and another woman, will be shipped back to the Navy.

Police said a search warrant filed in Palm Beach County shows that Oefelein paid for Nowak's cell phone.

In interviews with the three, it emerged Oefelein considered his relationship with Nowak to be cooling as the relationship with Shipman was warming up, although Shipman said in her police interview she had doubts about how Oefelein felt about Nowak.

Oefelein has admitted to being romantically involved with former astronaut Lisa Nowak ...

Oefelein told detectives he had a two-year relationship with Nowak but ended it some time after he started a relationship with Shipman.


***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 11:54 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"Rape happens with same sex groups too, as YOU pointed out. I didn't say that I have no problem with it, I said I don't know of any way to solve the problem."

Oh, I didn't get that emphasis from your posts.

But rape is so much LESS and issue with all female groups.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 11:59 AM

FREMDFIRMA


BYTE
Quote:

I said I don't know of any way to solve the problem.

I do.

It's called mutual respect - problem with that is that it kinda has to be either taught from the cradle on up, or somehow via personal epiphany that becomes fully internalized, and with our current intensely divisive society and us-n-them dynamic, that's a hard road to break new trail from, especially when one of the very first lessons children learn from their parents is that they are subhuman, lesser beings and considered non-persons till they are eighteen, something which is bitterly and painfully reinforced on a daily basis in too many families.

Once a division like that has been firmly planted in a childs mind to fester, the others aren't too far behind, sexism, racism, intolerance on religious and cultural levels, etc.

You couldn't do it with an army anyway, cause the us military EXISTS on an us-n-them dynamic to the point where they see even us civvies as lesser beings, as too does law enforcement or any other function of government.

But it CAN be done, CoTL runs on it, couldn't have ever functioned without it, cause it happens to be the very foundation of the organization itself.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:00 PM

BYTEMITE


Why do you say that?

Rape between females can be more likely and more readily used as a humiliation tool in social interaction.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:04 PM

BYTEMITE


Mutual respect is important, but how do you continue to foster and encourage mutual respect in a high conflict situation, when most rape occurs?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:06 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"Why do you say that?

Rape between females can be more likely and more readily used as a humiliation tool in social interaction."


It's just statistical - if you look at rape in female prisons and rape in male prisons there is less of it among females prisoners. (I'm not counting rape and abuse by guards and staff.)

"Stop Prisoner Rape, Inc. statistics indicate that there are more men raped in U.S. prisons than non-incarcerated women similarly assaulted. They estimate that young men are five times more likely to be attacked ..."

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:17 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"... how do you continue to foster and encourage mutual respect in a high conflict situation, when most rape occurs ..."



Heterosexual rapists do not rape b/c they are in mutual conflict with a particular women. They (for the most part) intentionally set out to find a victim. The statistic that most victims 'know' their rapists includes a first-time casual meeting in a bar minutes or hours before a rape, which is a common situation. But before that chance encounter as predator and victim they were strangers.

And then there are the date-rapists who do not understand what NO means (while her lips said NO she really meant yes), as well as the rapists who don't mind an incapacitated women (and who may perform said chemical incapacitation).

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:18 PM

BYTEMITE


Not counting guards and staff? Shouldn't you be? Rape is most often used by sociopaths to establish or reinforce dominance.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:21 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Bytemite:

PLEASE !

While I'm using prison statistics to show how it is that males when confined together rape more than females, this has nothing to do with normal insitutions where reasonably normal people are voluntarily together for a specific purpose; and without guards and staff with weapons and a helpless population.

Try not to confuse the two, will you ?

(But if you WANT to discuss the issue, male prison guards and staff rape more often than female guards and staff. You happy now ?)

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:26 PM

BYTEMITE


Quote:



Heterosexual rapists do not rape b/c they are in mutual conflict with a particular women. They (for the most part) intentionally set out to find a victim. The statistic that most victims 'know' their rapists includes a first-time casual meeting in a bar minutes or hours before a rape, which is a common situation.



I have not ever heard that interpretation of that statistic.

You seem to be making the argument that rape is primarily something that men do. And some of your previous comments in this thread I find somewhat anti-male.

If this is true, and it's primarily men, why might this be?

EDIT: Weird formatting issue.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:31 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


The oddness of the 'known to victim' statistic - it's one of those weird things one learns as one goes along in life.

Rapists are primarily male (98%).
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=percentage+male+rapists&btnG=Goog
le+Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi
=

If you can find out why, you could be in line for some major scientific prize.



***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:31 PM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Bytemite:

PLEASE !

While I'm using prison statistics to show how it is that males when confined together rape more than females, this has nothing to do with normal insitutions where reasonably normal people are voluntarily together for a specific purpose; and without guards and staff with weapons and a helpless population.

Try not to confuse the two, will you ?

(But if you WANT to discuss the issue, male prison guards and staff rape more often than female guards and staff. You happy now ?)

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.



I'm not sure what institutions and scenarios you're meaning and wanting to discuss, then. The military has a lot of social similarity to prison, in that there is a clear hierarchy and power-dominance structure, as well as a certain mindset of dispute resolution through force.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:33 PM

BYTEMITE


Might I propose social pressures for males that result in a sociopathic emotional and mental response?

I don't believe the old cock and bull about it being a regression to a distinctly male desire to have as many partners as possible. It's easy to just dismiss these men, and by association all men, as having something wrong with them by that argument. By this theory, all men potentially become rapists, which is not what I observe.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:35 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Long-term space missions and schools are two examples of non-military institutions and non-prison institutions. The 'military' is apparently divided on the problems they face with mixed-sex personnel. With the AF and army it is rape and assault - with the Navy it seems to be way too much friendliness.

I do favor sex-segregated schools, but for reasons which have nothing to do with rape or assault.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:41 PM

BYTEMITE


Long-term space missions I see as distinctly military, actually. Again, that same power-hierarchy.

Schools... This is a good point.

On one hand, I can't believe that completely segregating close to half the population from the other through their formative years can be a good thing. On the other... hormones and the same problematic social pressures that create rapists exist in school.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 1:00 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"Long-term space missions I see as distinctly military, actually. Again, that same power-hierarchy."

Not when the missions are scientific or (far in the future) settlers. Let me ask you this - is Southwest Airlines 'military' ? After all, they have a pilot, a set of rules, and a bunch of civilians confined for the duration. Is it any more or less 'military' than a bus line with a driver, a set of rules, and passengers ?

As for single-sex schools, they seem to promote overall better outcomes, not just in academics:

http://www.singlesexschools.org/OCR.htm


***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 1:16 PM

BYTEMITE


Not military in the sense that it's backed by government, but in the sense of an airline backed by a corporation, and the power of the corporation to press charges if you cause trouble, and the authority vested in the captain, copilot, stewards, and any federal marshals on the plane while in air... I could describe that as a militaristic structure, where martial law is the ruling law.

The question is in the ability of the captain/co-pilot/federal marshal and the bus driver to enforce their command and authority. And I've seen bus drivers who can, and I've seen people ejected from a bus.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 1:55 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Then you are saying that ANY group with enforced rules (even mutually agreed-on ones) is military in nature: FURTHER, you are IMPLYING that military-style training is required to belong to such a group. You are talking about any country, any city, any formal group. I submit that military training is not a requirement for membership.

***************************************************************

I would argue that what's needed for long-term missions and groups is emotional maturity and social stability along with specific technical skills.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 2:01 PM

BYTEMITE


The passengers have no such training, they are civilians. But in all these cases, one group is expected to comply, without question, to the orders that a person with authority makes, as are the underlings of the person "in charge." The model for this is based on naval military rules, hence the title of captain. I believe that the captains of airliners are also supposed to carry weapons?

The jump is easy to make from an airline crew to a space shuttle crew as to similarities.

I agree in retrospect that perhaps the busdriver may not necessarily be militaristic, but some bus drivers have militaristic mindsets.

I'm about to go home, but on the way, I'll try to think of a power structure that I don't consider military. I think the distinguishing line may involve guns and/or threats of force/death/violence in the case of non-compliance.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 2:12 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


" But in all these cases, one group is expected to comply, without question, to the orders that a person with authority makes ..."

And yet, when the passengers act in a non-military model - for instance, acting in concert (and without orders or permission) to disarm a threatening co-passenger - things not only don't fall apart, they actually - go better.

What I am saying is that the military model is not necessary and may even be detrimental to many types of missions and institutions. Long-term space missions for example, would be profoundly harmed by a militaristic model, specifically b/c the model selects for socially maladaptive outcomes. For example, heightening of aggression and depersonalization that (select for and) lead to rape, fragging, assault, random shooting of civilians etc. Do you think THAT is a requirement for space missions ?

I know a lot of people have been raised on science fiction that leans heavily on the military stereotype. But that falls apart in the face of reality, where the group NEEDS every member to willingly cooperate and contribute, where friction and resentment are measured in lowered chances of survival, where social predators drain more than they contribute and there is no slack.

Another example, and I think a stellar one, of long-term missions is the scientific base in Antarctica. If you read up on it, you will find it is not at all militaristic.

The airline btw in not militaristic - b/c the vast number of the 'members' - the passengers - are not trained, and b/c the airline is specifically charged with the well being of its passengers and crew - a mindset that is the exact opposite of the military one. A pilot or crew member who was aggressive would be a detriment to the flight.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 3:01 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


"Rapists are primarily male (98%).
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=percentage+male+rapists&btnG=Goog
le+Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi
=

If you can find out why, you could be in line for some major scientific prize."


Hello,

It may be cultural. When a man wakes up after getting sloshed and finds that he's had relations with a woman he didn't intend to, he may feel dirty and disgusted. He is not particularly likely to consider the event rape, even if his judgment was negatively impacted and hers was not. Even if he decides to consider the episode a rape, he is unlikely to report it due to the strong cultural bias against the validity of the idea.

In a woman's case, this may very well be considered rape, and be supported as such.

If a man is pressured into having sex with a woman when he really doesn't want to, he is unlikely to consider the event rape.

If a woman is pressured into having sex with a man when she really doesn't want to, she may consider the event a rape.

There are a lot of differences in the way a man and a woman will interpret the same types of incidents. If you took all the incidents where a man's judgment was impacted, or he said 'no' and was pressured to have sex anyway, you might find that this constitutes an 'unreported rape' statistic. However, the number of men who would report such incidents as rape is likely to be very different than the number of women who would do so.

I am sure that there are also many statuatory rape incidents involving underage males and adult women that go undetected and unreported.

There is a very wide divide of cultural expectation between men and women.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 3:37 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Ehh --- I don't think you can shave too much off that 98% figure.

If men are 5x more likely to be raped by other (male) prisoners than women are to be raped by other (female) prisoners, that, (and a few rough calculations) would mean that ~83% of all rapists are men.

But for the same reasons that men are less likely to report being raped by a women, they are less likely to report being raped by another man. And for the same reasons that women are more likely to report being raped by a man, they would be more likely to report being raped by another woman. That makes the percentage of male rapists higher than 83%.

Somewhere between 83 and 98% I think is where the true number lies. Males are then STILL the vast majority of rapists.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 3:52 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

I'm about to go home, but on the way, I'll try to think of a power structure that I don't consider military. I think the distinguishing line may involve guns and/or threats of force/death/violence in the case of non-compliance.

You won't find many, cause they're usually a "threat" to the power structures above.

However, consider the Volunteer Fire Department, or a Bake Sale, perhaps, as two very different types of Voluntarist Collective.

Generally it's an Anarchist thing, and we're all slobbering mad terrorist bomb throwers, don't ya know...
*cue dripping sarcasm*

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 3:57 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

Generally it's an Anarchist thing, and we're all slobbering mad terrorist bomb throwers, don't ya know...
*cue dripping sarcasm*

-F






Terrorist!

*cue dripping sarcasm some more!*







Mike

Sweeping generalizations are always wrong!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 4:50 PM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

And yet, when the passengers act in a non-military model - for instance, acting in concert (and without orders or permission) to disarm a threatening co-passenger - things not only don't fall apart, they actually - go better.

What I am saying is that the military model is not necessary and may even be detrimental to many types of missions and institutions. Long-term space missions for example, would be profoundly harmed by a militaristic model, specifically b/c the model selects for socially maladaptive outcomes. For example, heightening of aggression and depersonalization that (select for and) lead to rape, fragging, assault, random shooting of civilians etc. Do you think THAT is a requirement for space missions ?

I know a lot of people have been raised on science fiction that leans heavily on the military stereotype. But that falls apart in the face of reality, where the group NEEDS every member to willingly cooperate and contribute, where friction and resentment are measured in lowered chances of survival, where social predators drain more than they contribute and there is no slack.

Another example, and I think a stellar one, of long-term missions is the scientific base in Antarctica. If you read up on it, you will find it is not at all militaristic.

The airline btw in not militaristic - b/c the vast number of the 'members' - the passengers - are not trained, and b/c the airline is specifically charged with the well being of its passengers and crew - a mindset that is the exact opposite of the military one. A pilot or crew member who was aggressive would be a detriment to the flight.




I'm not saying that model or structure is GOOD, I'm saying that's how I see it.

>_> I got hungry and started thinking about dinner on the ride home. ._. I'm easily distracted.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 4:56 PM

FREMDFIRMA



"This could happen to YOU, baby, this could happen to ANYONE, bwaa hah hah - one of these days.... Milkshake! BOOM!"

How can you not love the guy ?

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 5, 2009 5:34 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Byte

What you said was: "Long-term space missions I see as distinctly military, actually."

Your opinion without dissent, and presumably your endorsement.

There actually is no reason for it to be based on a military model, and, as I have proposed and supported already, the military model would be detrimental to the mission.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 5, 2009 5:41 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Frem

Give it up. Even your VFD and bake sale have leaders, rules, and enforcement. AND they depend on people following commonly internalized rules: you can't use flour laced with lots of rat feces in your cake as a way to try and use it up. The guy with airpak training gets to use the airpak - no one else.

Just b/c one has a leader, rules and enforcement doesn't make the organization a 'military'.

To use the example of the peaceable baboons - it's not like males don't violently contest - they just don't take their aggressions out on helpless baboons. Violent-dominant baboons that join the troop stop picking on everyone. Baboons that leave the troop revert to regular baboon behavior.

THERE ARE SOCIAL RULES THAT ARE ENFORCED EVEN IN PEACEFULLY TRANSFORMED SOCIETIES.

Social rules are NECESSARY to a peaceable society.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 5, 2009 6:06 AM

BYTEMITE


Actually, again, that was a comment on how I SEE IT, hence me saying precisely that. It was not an endorsement. No where in that sentence do I say, "ain't it grand?!"

And considering how I've been describing my opinion that a military structure leads to social pressures and mindsets conducive to threats, violence, rape, humiliation, and disrespect, I really don't see how I could have given the impression of being in favour of these structures.

All I have been in this thread is having a calm, neutral, and objective discussion. I have no ulterior motives here, and I am not saying things which I don't mean as some sort of attempt at manipulation or falsehood.


So, in basic, I agree with you that a military model is a bad one for long-term space flights. Is it the model I see in practice? Pretty much. Is it the model I predict will continue to be used in the future? Yes. Do I think we'll see more sociopathic freakouts from astronauts because of this and the mindsets astronauts have been trained to have? Yep.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 5, 2009 6:15 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Frem

Give it up. Even your VFD and bake sale have leaders, rules, and enforcement. AND they depend on people following commonly internalized rules: you can't use flour laced with lots of rat feces in your cake as a way to try and use it up. The guy with airpak training gets to use the airpak - no one else.

Just b/c one has a leader, rules and enforcement doesn't make the organization a 'military'.

To use the example of the peaceable baboons - it's not like males don't violently contest - they just don't take their aggressions out on helpless baboons. Violent-dominant baboons that join the troop stop picking on everyone. Baboons that leave the troop revert to regular baboon behavior.

THERE ARE SOCIAL RULES THAT ARE ENFORCED EVEN IN PEACEFULLY TRANSFORMED SOCIETIES.

Social rules are NECESSARY to a peaceable society.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.



I don't think that's at all what we're arguing.

Both Frem and I agree that some form of social contract is necessary whenever human beings comes together. So is some form of organization, say, for distribution purposes for goods and needed supplies. If I've given the impression that I thought all forms of organization and oversight are militaristic and "bad," then this was unintentional. Though I think all forms of organization and oversight need to guard against corruption, and that simple is most likely best to prevent the mechanisms from being hijacked.

When a person identifies themselves as an anarchist, very few actually believe that the world would be better off plunged into complete chaos and violence. However, that is a common perception of anarchists that has been propagandized, and not helped by certain unfortunate nutjobs.

What both he and I disagree with in the sense of a military structure is the authority/dominance/powerplay backed by threats of force/violence/etc.

And some seemingly non military structures can have or can develop some similarities to military structures, often dependent on the people involved in them and their conflict resolution style. These situations can bred the same militaristic mindsets, and reinforce these mindsets where already present. I would describe them as socially toxic environments.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 5, 2009 7:38 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"(anarchy) ... very few actually believe that the world would be better off plunged into complete chaos and violence ..."

Well, I think of the Maya. It is assumed they dissolved back into the jungle when their society no longer met their needs. (And the ones that stayed experienced a slow decline due to inadequate nutrition, disease, infant mortality etc.) That I think is a possible example of non-violent anarchy. So I don't necessarily equate anarchy with violence, though the two are often found together.


I just prefer a functioning society, with its social resources.

"What both he and I disagree with in the sense of a military structure is the authority/dominance/powerplay backed by threats of force/violence/etc."

What is violence ? In a society where survival depends on being in the group, is shunning (threat of death) violence ?

To get back to the peaceful baboon troop - how are the rules enforced ? Whatever signals are sent, the implied threat is enough to make males change their ways. Whenever you have rules that are enforced, there is significant threat of reprisal. It may not be overt, but it is there.

No, I don't have an answer to this. I am just musing.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 5, 2009 8:13 AM

BYTEMITE


I don't think participation in the group is necessarily essential to survival. Using your own baboon troop example, there are also lone baboons who do much of the same eating, and sleeping, and living. Their reproductive potential is drastically reduced, but actual living and quality of life is not.

I hold that reproductive success isn't a valid measure of quality of life anyway, or at least it isn't so much in the human world. I point out there are human hermits, who choose their lifestyle.

So no, I don't think necessarily that shunning or exile is a threat of death, even if groups are a useful survival mechanism.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Oops! Clown Justin Trudeau accidently "Sieg Heils!" a Nazi inside Canadian parliament
Mon, November 25, 2024 01:24 - 4 posts
Stupid voters enable broken government
Mon, November 25, 2024 01:04 - 130 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Mon, November 25, 2024 00:09 - 7499 posts
The predictions thread
Mon, November 25, 2024 00:02 - 1190 posts
Netanyahu to Putin: Iran must withdraw from Syria or Israel will ‘defend itself’
Sun, November 24, 2024 23:56 - 16 posts
Putin's Russia
Sun, November 24, 2024 23:51 - 69 posts
The Olive Branch (Or... a proposed Reboot)
Sun, November 24, 2024 23:44 - 4 posts
Musk Announces Plan To Buy MSNBC And Turn It Into A News Network
Sun, November 24, 2024 23:39 - 2 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, November 24, 2024 23:35 - 4763 posts
Punishing Russia With Sanctions
Sun, November 24, 2024 18:05 - 565 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sun, November 24, 2024 18:01 - 953 posts
Elections; 2024
Sun, November 24, 2024 16:24 - 4799 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL