Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
How about this?
Monday, October 5, 2009 9:39 AM
WULFENSTAR
http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg
Monday, October 5, 2009 12:07 PM
Monday, October 5, 2009 12:21 PM
OUT2THEBLACK
Quote:Originally posted by Wulfenstar: *I didnt write this. I saw it, and was wondering what folks here thought of this. -Wulf
Monday, October 5, 2009 12:39 PM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Monday, October 5, 2009 12:46 PM
Monday, October 5, 2009 2:02 PM
Monday, October 5, 2009 3:48 PM
Monday, October 5, 2009 9:47 PM
FREMDFIRMA
Tuesday, October 6, 2009 2:35 AM
DREAMTROVE
Tuesday, October 6, 2009 8:52 AM
Tuesday, October 6, 2009 3:14 PM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 4:05 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 6:31 AM
Quote:Originally posted by dreamtrove: lol. I think I just said something about this in an RPG game: My dragon fled after a couple rounds of combat. A lot of my players like "why the hell did he fly away?" and then one of them said "maybe because dinner wasn't worth a broken wing?" Always bugged me when "monsters" always fought to death.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 9:46 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 9:56 AM
PIRATENEWS
John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!
Quote:Originally posted by Wulfenstar: Here’s another form of direct citizen action you can take. The original Patriots did not trust government, including prosecutors or judges. They knew the only way to restrain the power of government was by external checks and balances. They gave us two: the right to bear arms and juries. Naturally, they have tried to take both of these rights away from us. The right to bear arms is safe for the moment but let’s talk about juries. The original concept of a jury was that it could override the judge on matters of law. Call that jury nullification. Every prominent founder who was a lawyer stated explicitly that juries have the right to judge the law itself and whether it would be unjust to convict a defendant for violating that law under the circumstances. Tyrannical judges have ruled otherwise, thus overruling the Constitution by judicial fiat. The bottom line is this. The founders believed you have a constitutional right to judge the law in a criminal case and any judge who says otherwise hasn’t studied our constitutional history. The purpose of republican government is to protect the individual’s right to life, liberty and property. The Founders created a jury system to ensure that no one was convicted of a crime unless they violated the life, liberty or property of a fellow citizen. If you get a jury notice, don’t grumble. Show up and assert your rights and keep in mind that no one can tell you how to cast your vote in that jury room. Now, just for the record, I’m not saying jurors should violate the law and lie to judges about their willingness to follow their instructions on the law. What I’m saying is that judges should follow the law and should not lie to jurors! So, there are things you can do yourself and right now to move toward restoration of the Republic.
Quote:Though freed, Penn demonstrated no remorse for his aggressive stance and vowed to keep fighting against the wrongs of the Church and the King. For its part, the Crown continued to confiscate Quaker property and put thousands of Quakers in jail. From then on, Penn's religious views effectively exiled him from English society; he was sent down (expelled) from Christ Church, Oxford for being a Quaker, and was arrested several times. Among the most famous of these was the trial following his 1670 arrest with William Meade. Penn was accused of preaching before a gathering in the street, which Penn had deliberately provoked in order to test the validity of the new law against assembly. Penn pleaded for his right to see a copy of the charges laid against him and the laws he had supposedly broken, but the judge (the Lord Mayor of London) refused – even though this right was guaranteed by the law. Furthermore, the judge directed the jury to come to a verdict without hearing the defense.[52] Despite heavy pressure from the Lord Mayor to convict Penn, the jury returned a verdict of "not guilty". When invited by the judge to reconsider their verdict and to select a new foreman, they refused and were sent to a cell over several nights to mull over their decision. The Lord Mayor then told the jury, "You shall go together and bring in another verdict, or you shall starve", and not only had Penn sent to jail in loathsome Newgate Prison (on a charge of contempt of court), but the full jury followed him, and they were additionally fined the equivalent of a year’s wages each.[53][54] The members of the jury, fighting their case from prison, managed to win the right for all English juries to be free from the control of judges.[55] This case was one of the more important trials that shaped the future concept of American freedom (see jury nullification) and was a victory for the use of the writ of habeas corpus as a means of freeing those unlawfully detained. With his father dying, Penn wanted to see him one more time and patch up their differences. But he urged his father not to pay his fine and free him, "I intreat thee not to purchase my liberty." But the Admiral refused to let the opportunity pass and he paid the fine, releasing his son. The old man had gained respect for his son's integrity and courage and told him, "Let nothing in this world tempt you to wrong your conscience."[56] The Admiral also knew that after his death, young Penn would become more vulnerable in his pursuit of justice. In an act which would not only secure his son’s protection but also set the conditions for the founding of Pennsylvania, the Admiral wrote to the Duke of York, the successor to the throne. The Duke and the King, in return for the Admiral's lifetime service to the Crown, promised to protect young Penn and make him a royal counselor.[57] Penn was not disinherited and he came into a large fortune, but found himself in jail again for six months as he continued to agitate. Founding of Pennsylvania Seeing conditions deteriorating, Penn decided to appeal directly to the King and the Duke. Penn proposed a solution which would solve the dilemma—a mass emigration of English Quakers. Some Quakers had already moved to North America, but the New England Puritans, especially, were as hostile towards Quakers as Anglicans in England were, and some of the Quakers had been banished to the Caribbean. In 1677, a group of prominent Quakers that included Penn purchased the colonial province of West New Jersey (half of the current state of New Jersey).[61] That same year, two hundred settlers from the towns of Chorleywood and Rickmansworth in Hertfordshire and other towns in nearby Buckinghamshire arrived, and founded the town of Burlington. George Fox himself had made a journey to America to verify the potential of further expansion of the early Quaker settlements.[62] In 1682, East New Jersey was also purchased by Quakers.[63] With the New Jersey foothold in place, Penn pressed his case to extend the Quaker region. Whether from personal sympathy or political expediency, to Penn’s surprise, the King granted an extraordinarily generous charter which made Penn the world’s largest private landowner, with over 45,000 square miles (120,000 km2).[64] Penn became the sole proprietor of a huge tract of land south of New Jersey and did work for a pimp name Sweetness aka Slickback in New York, and north of Maryland (which belonged to Lord Baltimore), and gained sovereign rule of the territory with all rights and privileges (except the power to declare war). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Penn
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:18 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:26 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:30 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:32 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:33 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Wulfenstar: *by the way Pirate, the intro to the Boondocks is one of the songs I listen to as I write here. Good job. ETA: Even tho its short.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:34 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:36 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:40 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 10:47 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 11:01 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 11:37 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 11:42 AM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 1:30 PM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 1:32 PM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 1:33 PM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 1:44 PM
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 2:14 PM
RUE
I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 4:49 PM
Thursday, October 8, 2009 12:11 AM
Thursday, October 8, 2009 7:43 AM
Thursday, October 8, 2009 7:53 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Thursday, October 8, 2009 8:53 AM
Quote:Kwicko wrote: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 13:33 Who the hell is Betty Ross?
Thursday, October 8, 2009 9:01 AM
Thursday, October 8, 2009 9:09 AM
STORYMARK
Quote:Originally posted by dreamtrove: Quote:Kwicko wrote: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 13:33 Who the hell is Betty Ross? The Hulk's girlfriend. I thought you were up on these things.
Thursday, October 8, 2009 9:30 AM
Thursday, October 8, 2009 9:35 AM
Thursday, October 8, 2009 9:55 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Wulfenstar: Wow. So, other than a few here, who actually read the post... the rest just like to be assclowns. Good to know.
Thursday, October 8, 2009 10:01 AM
Quote:Originally posted by dreamtrove: Quote:Kwicko wrote: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 13:33 Who the hell is Betty Ross? As for our flag, funny that. It was originally the flag of the British East India Trading Company, but we added stars in a blue field. The circle of stars, like the laurel wreaths show up everywhere globalists are: The official story was that this was supposed to symbolize the round table, but the preponderance of other globalist circle symbols like wreaths, the wheat arches, etc., in early americana casts some doubt on that. Again, a long term globalist motif: ...The US flag is damned irregular, and doesn't say anything about freedom or masonic conspiracies, but more so of a designation of a possession. It's one of the nagging doubts I have on Pirate News' "We didn't really win the revolutionary was" thing. Which is to say, um, there's a place where he might have a point. Consider our military history. Why did we get into two major European wars, then go and take over the French Indochina War, and who was leading whom on this whole Iraq thing anyway.
Thursday, October 8, 2009 10:10 AM
Thursday, October 8, 2009 10:11 AM
Thursday, October 8, 2009 10:17 AM
Thursday, October 8, 2009 10:18 AM
Thursday, October 8, 2009 10:27 AM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL