REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Racism ??? Naww ... whatever gave you THAT idea ?

POSTED BY: RUE
UPDATED: Saturday, October 24, 2009 14:40
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3122
PAGE 3 of 3

Friday, October 23, 2009 1:41 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Nothing intelligent to say Kwikky? That's par for the course. Still lovin' Obama and Pelosi? Good for you!


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 1:43 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

Tell me, is it offensive to you if I say that all conservatives are pedophiles who should be shot in the street like the rabid dogs they are? And if so, why does that offend you?


It should be offensive to your fellow liberals when you expose your radical delusions for all to see clearly.
Criminals are by far and away liberals, voting for liberals an average of 89% nationwide. It would take an incredibly dense or delusioned unit like you to transfer liberal tendancies you perpetually attempt to deny onto the opposition.




Again, reading comprehension really isn't your bag, is it, Rappy? You must've missed the "IF" part of that question, which was posted as a response-in-kind to Jong's (or was it YOUR?) passive-aggressive "all liberals" bullshit that he claims isn't offensive because it doesn't call anyone here by name.

So, as another response-in-kind, here's yours: Pedophiles are by far and away Republicans, voting for Republicans an average of 89% nationwide. It would take an incredibly dense pervert like you to transfer your pedophile tendencies onto your opposition.

Mike

Let the wild rumpus start!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 1:45 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Nothing intelligent to say Kwikky? That's par for the course. Still lovin' Obama and Pelosi? Good for you!

p.s Mis-spelling is different than mis-typing...or didn't you know that?



You misspelled "mis-spelling".

Never loved Pelosi, but it doesn't surprise me that you're too fucking stupid to figure that out. Typical of a conservative, right?

Mike

Let the wild rumpus start!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 1:51 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:
Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
"The cost of banning free speech is too high."

Well, free speech gave the world the Nazis, the Serbs, Rwanda.



Really? I thought it was gun control that gave the world Nazis, Serbs, Rwanda.
Maybe you listen to CNN too much.



Gun control? Really? So why hasn't widespread genocide broken out in Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand, or Canada?

Maybe you listen to PirateNews too much.

Mike

Let the wild rumpus start!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 2:01 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Congesssman calls all Republicans "knuckle-dragging neandertals" in the Capitol and turns into a liberal hero, then there is no longer any room for civililty anywhere. And he refuses to apologize.


Yeah, HE was the one responsible for the lack of civility in Congress. Not the "death panels" folks, not the "Obama = Hitler" crowd, not the "He's a MUSLIM!" bunch, not Joe (not his real name) "YOU LIE!" Wilson... Nope, it's ALL down to this one freshman congressman, who totally killed all civility in the Capitol.

Calling Republicans knuckle-dragging Neanderthals is an insult to knuckle-dragging Neanderthals.

Mike

Let the wild rumpus start!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 2:23 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Lack of civility generally implies a lack of respect. It doesn't matter who started it.

Something I think we could all learn from around here...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 4:48 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Lack of civility generally implies a lack of respect. It doesn't matter who started it.

Something I think we could all learn from around here...


I'm glad you said that Wulf, because that is exactly what we've had in this country for a long time. It was always there to a degree all through history, but the Bush election victory over Gore in 2000 was the spark that re-ignited the inferno from the embers that the Clinton Impeachment left smoldering. And with the explosion of the internet and cable tv giving forums and universal access to all, it is no wonder that our society continues to fragment and deteriorate to level that would have seemed un-imaginable a decade ago. Also there are just hundreds of new issues and micro issues always popping up, and ideological and cultural sides form immediately. Americans have never had so much shit thrown in their face in a never-ending parade of battles, and the unfortunate and ugly byproduct of all that is the complete loss of any respect for the "other" side. And as you said, after respect goes, civility vanishes next. And the liberals here show their uncivil ways in a 20-1 ratio every day.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 5:09 AM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:

I'm glad you said that Wulf, because that is exactly what we've had in this country for a long time. It was always there to a degree all through history, but the Bush election victory over Gore in 2000 was the spark that re-ignited the inferno from the embers that the Clinton Impeachment left smoldering. And with the explosion of the internet and cable tv giving forums and universal access to all, it is no wonder that our society continues to deteriorate to level that would have seemed un-imaginable a decade ago. Also there are just hundreds of new issues and micro issues always popping up, and ideological and cultural sides form immediately. Americans have never had so much shit thrown in their face in a never-ending parade of battles, and the unfortunate and ugly byproduct of all that is the complete loss of any respect for the "other" side. And as you said, after respect goes, civility vanishes next. And the liberals here show their uncivil ways in a 20-1 ratio every day.



Brilliant post Jongs - seriously - I applaud every bit (up until the dig at liberals, and not because I am one (not) but because you were riding the high road up until then).
I think you completely nailed the fallacy of "the internet revolution" how more voices will lead to more participation and better understanding. If anything it's just more noise.


Scifi movie music + Firefly dialogue clips, 24 hours a day - http://www.scifiradio.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 5:43 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by pizmobeach:
Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:

I'm glad you said that Wulf, because that is exactly what we've had in this country for a long time. It was always there to a degree all through history, but the Bush election victory over Gore in 2000 was the spark that re-ignited the inferno from the embers that the Clinton Impeachment left smoldering. And with the explosion of the internet and cable tv giving forums and universal access to all, it is no wonder that our society continues to deteriorate to level that would have seemed un-imaginable a decade ago. Also there are just hundreds of new issues and micro issues always popping up, and ideological and cultural sides form immediately. Americans have never had so much shit thrown in their face in a never-ending parade of battles, and the unfortunate and ugly byproduct of all that is the complete loss of any respect for the "other" side. And as you said, after respect goes, civility vanishes next. And the liberals here show their uncivil ways in a 20-1 ratio every day.



Brilliant post Jongs - seriously - I applaud every bit (up until the dig at liberals, and not because I am one (not) but because you were riding the high road up until then).
I think you completely nailed the fallacy of "the internet revolution" how more voices will lead to more participation and better understanding. If anything it's just more noise.


Awesome Pizmo, and you certainly nailed the part you objected to perfectly. I do admit ending it that way, because that high road you cite is often treacherous ground, and as a character you're familiar with once said, "I guess I'm not 100%."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 5:50 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

It should be offensive to your fellow liberals when you expose your radical delusions for all to see clearly.
I know Mike already responded to this but... Damn, JSF! It should be offensive to your fellow conservative when you expose your egregious stupidity for all to see clearly.

Apparently you don't understand hypothetical statements!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 5:55 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

but when their new Liberal limp-wristed, over-bitten lisping Olbermann-scripted, Perez Hilton-in-training Fla. Congesssman calls all Republicans "knuckle-dragging neanderthals" in the Capitol and turns into a liberal hero, then there is no longer any room for civililty anywhere.
Are you doing this in purpose, Jongsstraw??? Or are you really that dense?

Because apparently, it's OK for YOU (and all conservatives) to spout invective, but then your feelings get hurt when someone returns the favor. Who are you, exactly, to be calling for civility? And why should we listen to anything you have to say, seeing as you appear to have the insight of a fruitfly on the topic?
Quote:

Lack of civility generally implies a lack of respect.
Ditto to you, Wulf. Seeing the mote in your brother's eye but not the log in your own.

When you guys start showing some respect - or at least not breath-taking hypocrisy- I'll feel like I can take you more seriously on the topic. As for now, I think Democrats and liberals in general need to start being MORE confrontational, not less. And we should have started about 10 years ago. Too bad libruls didn't show up at Bush speeches openly carrying weapons and threatening his life, eh? Maybe if we had started calling you guys knuckle-dragging Neandertals earlier, that smack upside the head would have dented your bad behavior. Because being nice and bipartisan- at least on the national scene- doesn't seem to have gotten anywhere.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 6:21 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

but when their new Liberal limp-wristed, over-bitten lisping Olbermann-scripted, Perez Hilton-in-training Fla. Congesssman calls all Republicans "knuckle-dragging neanderthals" in the Capitol and turns into a liberal hero, then there is no longer any room for civililty anywhere.
Are you doing this in purpose, Jongsstraw??? Or are you really that dense?

Because apparently, it's OK for YOU (and all conservatives) to spout invective, but then your feelings get hurt when someone returns the favor. Who are you, exactly, to be calling for civility? And why should we listen to anything you have to say, seeing as you appear to have the insight of a fruitfly on the topic?
Quote:

Lack of civility generally implies a lack of respect.
Ditto to you, Wulf. Seeing the mote in your brother's eye but not the log in your own.

When you guys start showing some respect - or at least not breath-taking hypocrisy- I'll feel like I can take you more seriously on the topic. As for now, I think Democrats and liberals in general need to start being MORE confrontational, not less. And we should have started about 10 years ago. Too bad libruls didn't show up at Bush speeches openly carrying weapons and threatening his life, eh? Maybe if we had started calling you guys knuckle-dragging Neandertals earlier, that smack upside the head would have dented your bad behavior. Because being nice and bipartisan- at least on the national scene- doesn't seem to have gotten anywhere.


Relax Signy. I never called for RWED civility, I just wrote about civility in general. Sorry if you felt coerced in any way to be civil. I will say that you same-brain Liberals are often friendly and civil to each other when you all agree on everything, and I'm often moved to wipe away a tear of jealous joy when I see it. Do you know if fruitflies are related to fireflies? Did you notice I tried your "underlining" technique? A little scary at first, but you're right, it really does enhance the point, and it feels oh so good.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 6:42 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Thanks for clarifying, Jongsstraw. Because for a moment there I thought you might start walking the talk.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 6:47 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Thanks for clarifying, Jongsstraw. Because for a moment there I thought you might start walking the talk.


I'm all yours. Whatever you want.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 7:26 AM

STORYMARK


I looooove the JS lies about name calling, gets called on it, totally ignores this fact, and then calls for civility.

You're a hoot, man. Keep it up.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 8:00 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
I looooove the JS lies about name calling, gets called on it, totally ignores this fact, and then calls for civility.

You're a hoot, man. Keep it up.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."


Hey Signy, if you circle back this thread, take a good look at this. This fine, upstanding, honest person posted distorted and sarcastic remarks right at me. It hurts girl. My spirit is shaken. And even worse so, coming so soon after you and I had such a truly beautiful, almost harmonious moment of togetherness and understanding back there. Oh for the love of mercy, I need some love, any love, librul love, Clinton love...help!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 8:29 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I circled back in this thread, and indeed, this is what I found in your very first post (as Rue so kindly pointed out, and as you ignored)
Quote:

And Niki2, or Rue/Signy, or whoever you are...why don't you take your head out of your ass and see what's going on with this Administration? Then you might not be so damn smug and condescending to FFF posters here. I think you DO know about all these things...you just can't deal with it, so you dismiss, demean, marginalize everything & everyone you don't like. Wake up, 'cause America surely is.
Heh. You want the milk of human kindness now??? Let's say I agree to be nice to ya for the next two days. What do I get in return? (An apology to all concerned for the unwarranted attack would be reasonable, but I don't expect to get one.)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 9:06 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hey Jongsie: still waiting for that apology, man! I mean, hell, you hurt MY feelings.

You apologize, and I promise to be nice to you for two whole days. But if not... well, maybe I'll just post like you do.

What a deal!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 9:10 AM

JONGSSTRAW


You want me to post all the things that have been hurled at me recently? I won't waste our time. Let's just say the highlight yesterday was when one of your favorites here referenced Dick Cheney's semen running somewhere on my body. Nice huh?

This piece you pasted that I wrote wrongly included you & Rue. I should not have dragged you two into it. Sorry.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 9:14 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hey, well- apology accepted then. Although I think you should apologize to Niki, too, who usually posts pretty reasonably.

So- you got your two days of "nice" coming. And just to sweeten the deal, those two days will be on Monday and Tuesday, since I'll be busy this weekend and not posting much.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 9:56 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Hey, well- apology accepted then. Although I think you should apologize to Niki, too, who usually posts pretty reasonably.

So- you got your two days of "nice" coming. And just to sweeten the deal, those two days will be on Monday and Tuesday, since I'll be busy this weekend and not posting much.


Thanks. From your perspective she does post reasonably, except that quality seems to vanish when some others are responded to.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 10:05 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I have not tracked pair interactions specifically, I just have generic impressions. Maybe I missed something. It wouldn't be the first time.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 10:19 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
I looooove the JS lies about name calling, gets called on it, totally ignores this fact, and then calls for civility.

You're a hoot, man. Keep it up.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."


Hey Signy, if you circle back this thread, take a good look at this. This fine, upstanding, honest person posted distorted and sarcastic remarks right at me.



I'll cop to sarcastic, but what, pray tell, was distorted?

Pretty clear series of events. You said you don't call names unprovoked, someone kindly proved that you JUST HAD, and you blithely moved on, ignoring it.

So, please, set me straight. Where was this so-called "distortion"? I wait with baited breath.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 10:45 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
I looooove the JS lies about name calling, gets called on it, totally ignores this fact, and then calls for civility.

You're a hoot, man. Keep it up.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."


Hey Signy, if you circle back this thread, take a good look at this. This fine, upstanding, honest person posted distorted and sarcastic remarks right at me.



I'll cop to sarcastic, but what, pray tell, was distorted?

Pretty clear series of events. You said you don't call names unprovoked, someone kindly proved that you JUST HAD, and you blithely moved on, ignoring it.

So, please, set me straight. Where was this so-called "distortion"? I wait with baited breath.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."


You can take the bait out of your breath. The distortion pertained to your saying that I was calling for civility & then mocking me for that call. I was not, and I discussed that with Signy right before you came into the fray. So that's what I considered distortion, not the part you thought, although I could say that no one responds to everything asked of them here, do they? Selective responses are common here. But no big. It's cool. Sarcasm is great. I live on it. We understand each other I believe, and co-existence is always preferable to the alternative.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 11:41 AM

RIVERLOVE


I would have expected an increase of threats to this President just due to the harsh reality that there is still some racism out there. There's the KKK and the Arayan Nation, and tons of other groups like them. They're all over the country, like troops of prison-yard boy scouts with no hair and really bad teeth. They're all over the internet. I can only imagine how many hours the Secret Service spends reading through all that shit. Still, I don't believe the average run-of-the-mill racist is inclined to do violence. They're a sad lot, but not very dangerous. Obama's security must be a national priority, cost be damned. An action against him would have frightening consequences that cannot be calculated.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 12:51 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:
I would have expected an increase of threats to this President just due to the harsh reality that there is still some racism out there. There's the KKK and the Arayan Nation, and tons of other groups like them. They're all over the country, like troops of prison-yard boy scouts with no hair and really bad teeth. They're all over the internet. I can only imagine how many hours the Secret Service spends reading through all that shit. Still, I don't believe the average run-of-the-mill racist is inclined to do violence. They're a sad lot, but not very dangerous. Obama's security must be a national priority, cost be damned. An action against him would have frightening consequences that cannot be calculated.




The first of which would be "President Joseph Biden". Yup. Wrap your head around THAT idea, and you'll see why even some of the white hate groups aren't too keen on taking their shots at the man who currently occupies that office.

Mike

Let the wild rumpus start!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 2:18 PM

FREMDFIRMA



I am a bad man to laugh at that, but I am laughing anyways.

S'why not even the Neo-Cons would whack Bush, no matter how he embarrassed em, cause then, well....

Lincoln mighta got away with more had he thought of that, cause mosta the evidence points to his own people settin that one up.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 2:27 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Anyway, to get back to the figures: 30 threats PER DAY - simple math ... zero, three times five, carry the one ... gives 10,950 per year.

THAT'S a lot of threats to be checking out. And no one has yet come up with an alternate explination to racism - why so many when just a couple months before that it was only 7 per day ?

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 23, 2009 3:30 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

The first of which would be "President Joseph Biden". Yup. Wrap your head around THAT idea, and you'll see why even some of the white hate groups aren't too keen on taking their shots at the man who currently occupies that office
Oh, I do hope you're right. But I'd counter that by saying that I'm not sure how many of them think that far in advance. White-hot hate doesn't make for the best logic...and hey, Biden's white, that's all some of them would care about...

And what's that old saying, something about "it's impossible to protect someone completely when another is willing to die to harm them"? Brrrrr...

Yes, most racists aren't violent. But too many ARE, as has been proven over and over and over. When you de-humanize someone, it's that much easier to attack them physically. The uber-right has been doing their very best to utilize that one, and I've been fearful since he was nominated. Political disagreement is NOTHING compared to the mindless hate of racism when it's encouraged.

________________________
Together we are greater than the sum of our parts

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 24, 2009 8:03 AM

RIVERLOVE


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Originally posted by Riverlove:
I would have expected an increase of threats to this President just due to the harsh reality that there is still some racism out there. There's the KKK and the Arayan Nation, and tons of other groups like them. They're all over the country, like troops of prison-yard boy scouts with no hair and really bad teeth. They're all over the internet. I can only imagine how many hours the Secret Service spends reading through all that shit. Still, I don't believe the average run-of-the-mill racist is inclined to do violence. They're a sad lot, but not very dangerous. Obama's security must be a national priority, cost be damned. An action against him would have frightening consequences that cannot be calculated.
________________________________________________


The first of which would be "President Joseph Biden". Yup. Wrap your head around THAT idea, and you'll see why even some of the white hate groups aren't too keen on taking their shots at the man who currently occupies that office.



The most hateful of them immerse in the "racism lifestyle" and live on compounds in Idaho raising their little children to give the Heil Hitler salute, and every day is Nazi Halloween for them. We generally ignore these comical inbred Jerry Springer rejects, but with the tensions in this country already, there could be a greater danger brewing in the backwoods. In one of their demented leader's mind it could be imagined as The Big Play for them. Manson and other cult leaders have shown they have the ability to command their believers to do anything. President Biden might sound great to them.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 24, 2009 2:40 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


True, RL, true...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL